Carotid artery bruit: is it safe and effective to auscultate the neck?

Physical exam myths: listening for carotid artery bruits in stroke patients

When a patient presents to the emergency department with a neurologic deficit and a cerebrovascular event is included in the differential diagnosis, the classic recommendation is to examine the carotid artery and assess for the presence of a bruit. The diagnostic yield and utility of this practice has seldom been called into question. This critical appraisal will review the practice of listening for a carotid artery bruit (CAB) in suspected stroke patients and analyze its clinical utility, including the sensitivity and specificity of a CAB for detecting a significant lesion and the potential impact a CAB may have on the investigation and disposition of such patients.

Symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis: just when we thought we had all the answers

The management of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis has been a hotly debated topic for decades. The publication of four randomized controlled trials of carotid endarterectomy has clarified many of the issues. Patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis >70% benefit most with an absolute risk reduction of 17% over 2 years with numbers needed to treat of 3-6, whereas in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis >60%, the absolute risk reduction is 1% per annum (numbers needed to treat = 14-17). There is doubt about the benefit in women >70 years of age with asymptomatic stenosis. Carotid angioplasty and stenting is in its infancy and may one day supplant carotid endarterectomy as the treatment of choice; however, currently indications for this procedure include participation in randomized controlled trials, surgically inaccessible stenosis, in patients with combined symptomatic carotid and symptomatic coronary artery disease or in patients with severe co-morbidities that preclude formal carotid endarterectomy.

The prognostic significance of asymptomatic carotid bruits in the elderly

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association between asymptomatic carotid bruits and the development of subsequent stroke in older adults with isolated systolic hypertension.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

The Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP), a 5-year randomized trial testing the efficacy of treating systolic hypertension in noninstitutionalized persons aged 60 years or older. From the original 4,736 SHEP participants, we identified a cohort of 4,442 persons who had no prior history of stroke, transient ischemic attack, or myocardial infarction at randomization.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The end point for this ancillary study was the development of a stroke. The average follow-up was 4.2 years. Carotid bruits were found in 284 (6.4%) of the participants at baseline. Strokes developed in 21 (7.4%) of those with carotid bruits and in 210 (5.0%) of those without carotid bruits. The unadjusted risk of stroke among persons with carotid bruits was 1.53 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98, 2.40). Adjusting for age, gender, race, blood pressure, smoking, lipid levels, self-reported aspirin use, and treatment group assignment, the relative risk of stroke among persons with asymptomatic carotid bruits was 1.29 (95% CI 0.80, 2.06). Among SHEP enrollees aged 60 to 69 years, there was a trend (p = .08) toward increased risk (relative risk [RR] 2.05; 95% CI 0.92, 4.68) of subsequent stroke in persons with, compared to those without, carotid bruits. However, among enrollees aged 70 years or over, there was no relation between carotid bruit and subsequent stroke (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.55, 1.76). In no other subgroup of SHEP enrollees did the presence of carotid bruit independently predict stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

Although we cannot rule out a small increased risk of stroke associated with bruits in asymptomatic SHEP enrollees aged 60 to 69 years, the utility of carotid bruits as a marker for increased risk of stroke among asymptomatic elderly with isolated systolic hypertension aged 70 years or older is limited.

Influence of age and hospital volume on the results of carotid endarterectomy: a statewide analysis of 9918 cases

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the impact of patient age and hospital volume on the results of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in contemporary practice.

METHODS

The Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission (MHSCRC) database was reviewed to identify all patients who underwent elective CEA as the primary procedure in all acute care hospitals in the state over the past 6 years.

RESULTS

From January 1990 through December 1995, 9918 elective CEAs were performed in 48 hospitals at a total charge of $68.9 million. Postoperative death and neurologic complications occurred in 90 (0.9%) and 166 (1.7%) cases, including 0.8% and 1.7%, 0.9% and 1.6%, 0.9% and 1.8%, and 1.4% and 1.3% of patients < 65 years, 65 to 69 years, 70 to 79 years, and > or = 80 years old, respectively. The mean length of stay and hospital charges increased linearly with increasing age: 4.2 days/$6550, 4.4 days/$6834, 4.8 days/$7059, and 5.6 days (p < 0.0001 vs others)/$7756 (p < 0.005 vs 70 to 79 years and p < 0.0003 vs < 70 years old), respectively, for patients < 65, 65 to 69, 70 to 79, and > or = 80 years old. The mortality rate was 1.9% in low-volume hospitals, 1.1% in moderate-volume hospitals, and 0.8% in high-volume hospitals. The neurologic complication rate was significantly higher (6.1%; p < 0.0001) in low-volume when compared with moderate-volume (1.3%) and high-volume (1.8%) hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

CEA is a safe procedure in the majority of hospitals in contemporary practice, even among the very elderly, who may experience a longer length of stay and higher charges correlating with their documented greater medical complexity.

The carotid endarterectomy: experience with 260 cases and discussion of the indications

During 1978 to 1989, 235 patients were operated upon with 260 procedures for cervical carotid endarterectomy. The patients were classified according to the presence or absence of ischaemic symptomatology, and for symptomatic patients, according to the reversibility or persistence of ischaemic symptoms. So the selection of patients was: reversible ischaemia 46%, stroke 29%, asymptomatic patients 25%. In the stroke group, no patient was operated on as an emergency, the endarterectomy was only performed after stabilization of the clinical state. Three subgroups were included in patients operated on for asymptomatic carotid stenosis: casual discovery 40%, treatment of the second carotid artery (previous endarterectomy for symptomatic contralateral stenosis) 34%, and treatment of the second carotid artery (previous ECIC by-pass for contralateral carotid occlusion) 26%. All patients were operated upon after angiographic exploration (femoral catheterisation in most cases), and after cerebral CT scan. The surgical technique included general anaesthesia, systematic shunting, endarterectomy after longitudinal arteriotomy, closure without patch. The operating microscope has been used since 1985. The surgical results were studied in terms of uneventful postoperative course (87%), reversible complications (8%) and long lasting complications (5%). The long lasting complications were of local origin (1%), of neurological origin (2%), of general origin (1%). Overall the operative outcome at 6 months was: return to previous clinical state 95%, neurological sequelae 2%, death 3%. In the patients operated on for asymptomatic carotid stenosis the overall outcome was: previous clinical state 97%, death 3%. The legitimacy of carotid endarterectomy procedure is discussed in relation to some recent pertinent literature.

Risk of carotid endarterectomy in the elderly

We used the Medicare claims files to describe operative mortality for 2,089 New England residents over the age of 65 who underwent carotid endarterectomy in 1984 and 1985. For patients ages 65 to 69, the risk of death within 30 days of surgery was 1.1 percent, (95% confidence interval = 0.5, 2.1), for those ages 70 to 74, 2.8 percent (1.7, 4.4), for those ages 75 to 79, 3.2 percent (1.8, 5.2), and for those over age 80, 4.7 percent (2.3, 8.5). Nearly 80 percent of patients underwent surgery at hospitals performing 40 or fewer carotid endarterectomies per year on the Medicare population. The adjusted odds ratio for 30 day mortality for patients undergoing surgery in these low-volume hospitals was 2.8 (95% CI = 1.1, 7.2) compared to higher volume hospitals. Although the Medicare claims data provided only limited data about post-operative strokes, analysis of post-operative stroke risk supported these findings.

Morbidity and mortality of carotid endarterectomy. A literature review of the results reported in the last 10 years

A review of the mortality and morbidity of carotid endarterectomy reported during the last 10 years was made and compared to the risk of carotid stenosis managed by the best medical treatment. For comparison, the patients were classified in asymptomatic patients (grade I), patients with transient ischaemic attacks (grade II), patients with ischaemic neurological deficits operated on acutely (grade III) and into patients with no or incomplete recovery 4-6 weeks after the stroke (grade IV). Based on the results of this literature review, only patients in grade II seem to benefit from carotid endarterectomy.