A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study to compare the efficacy and safety of three doses of botulinum toxin type A (Dysport) with placebo in upper limb spasticity after stroke

Botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of patients with post-stroke spasticity in Thailand: cost-utility and budget impact analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the cost-utility of botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) for treating upper limb (UL) and lower limb (LL) post-stroke spasticity.

DESIGN

Using a Markov model, adopting a societal perspective and a lifetime horizon with a 3% annual discount rate, the cost-utility analysis was conducted to compare BoNT-A combined with standard of care (SoC) with SoC alone. Costs, utilities, transitional probabilities and treatment efficacy were derived from 5-year retrospective data from tertiary hospitals and meta-analysis. Uncertainty analyses were performed.

SETTING

Tertiary hospitals in Thailand.

PARTICIPANTS

Cohort of post-stroke patients aged 55 years with UL or LL spasticity and a Modified Ashworth Scale score ≥1+.

INTERVENTIONS

BoNT-A (abobotulinumtoxinA: aboBoNT-A, onabotulinumtoxinA: onaBoNT-A or prabotulinumtoxinA: praBoNT-A) combined with SoC versus SoC alone.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Expected life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), considering a cost-effectiveness threshold of 160 000 THB (US$4468) per QALY gained.

RESULTS

The combination of aboBoNT-A and SoC yielded the highest QALYs gained (0.013 for UL and 0.11 for LL), followed by onaBoNT-A and SoC and praBoNT-A and SoC. The additional costs for treating UL and LL cases were highest for onaBoNT-A US$75 and US$95, respectively, followed by aboBoNT-A and praBoNT-A. ICER values for treating UL with aboBoNT-A, onaBoNT-A and praBoNT-A ranged from US$4669 to US$7541 per QALY. For LL treatments, aboBoNT-A and onaBoNT-A had ICER values ranging from US$7072 to US$15 182 per QALY. Integrating BoNT-A treatment delivery into the healthcare system would require a budget outlay of approximately US$413 246-US$966 103 that may vary annually by an additional US$50 260-US$335 064.

CONCLUSION

BoNT-A effectively reduces focal spasticity and improves quality of life in post-stroke patients. However, its cost-effectiveness in Thailand necessitates price negotiations as a condition for inclusion in the pharmaceutical reimbursement list.

Exploring the efficacy of neural mobilization and electromyographic analysis in enhancing post-stroke rehabilitation: A scoping review

Stroke survivors often suffer from upper limb spasticity and impaired motor function. This review seeks to: (1) explore the efficacy of neural mobilization, particularly using the Upper Limb Neurodynamic Test 1 (ULNT1), in modulating electromyographic (EMG) activity of muscles; (2) examine its role in reducing spasticity and improving functional outcomes; and (3) outline the current state of knowledge, identifying existing gaps and directions for future research. A comprehensive literature review was conducted, focusing on studies that implemented ULNT1 and EMG analysis in post-stroke patients. The included studies varied in participant characteristics, methodologies, and outcome measures. The results demonstrated that neural mobilization has the potential to reduce EMG activity in spastic muscles and modify pain perceptions. However, results regarding the improvement of range of motion and functional outcomes were mixed. Neural mobilization and electromyographic analysis show promise for improving post-stroke rehabilitation. However, further research is required to confirm these benefits, with more rigorous methodologies and larger sample sizes.

Clinical neurophysiology in the treatment of movement disorders: IFCN handbook chapter

In this review, different aspects of the use of clinical neurophysiology techniques for the treatment of movement disorders are addressed. First of all, these techniques can be used to guide neuromodulation techniques or to perform therapeutic neuromodulation as such. Neuromodulation includes invasive techniques based on the surgical implantation of electrodes and a pulse generator, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) or spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on the one hand, and non-invasive techniques aimed at modulating or even lesioning neural structures by transcranial application. Movement disorders are one of the main areas of indication for the various neuromodulation techniques. This review focuses on the following techniques: DBS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation, including transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), and focused ultrasound (FUS), including high-intensity magnetic resonance-guided FUS (MRgFUS), and pulsed mode low-intensity transcranial FUS stimulation (TUS). The main clinical conditions in which neuromodulation has proven its efficacy are Parkinson's disease, dystonia, and essential tremor, mainly using DBS or MRgFUS. There is also some evidence for Tourette syndrome (DBS), Huntington's disease (DBS), cerebellar ataxia (tDCS), and axial signs (SCS) and depression (rTMS) in PD. The development of non-invasive transcranial neuromodulation techniques is limited by the short-term clinical impact of these techniques, especially rTMS, in the context of very chronic diseases. However, at-home use (tDCS) or current advances in the design of closed-loop stimulation (tACS) may open new perspectives for the application of these techniques in patients, favored by their easier use and lower rate of adverse effects compared to invasive or lesioning methods. Finally, this review summarizes the evidence for keeping the use of electromyography to optimize the identification of muscles to be treated with botulinum toxin injection, which is indicated and widely performed for the treatment of various movement disorders.

The Role of Botulinum Toxin Type-A in Spasticity: Research Trends from a Bibliometric Analysis

Botulinum toxin type-A (BoNT-A) has emerged as a key therapeutic agent for the management of spasticity. This paper presents a comprehensive bibliometric and visual analysis of research concerning BoNT-A treatment of spasticity to elucidate current trends and future directions in this research area. A search was conducted in the Web of Science database for articles focused on the use of BoNT-A in spasticity published between 2000 and 2022. We extracted various metrics, including counts of publications and contributions from different countries, institutions, authors, and journals. Analytical methods in CiteSpace were employed for the examination of co-citations, collaborations, and the co-occurrence of keywords. Our search yielded 1489 publications. Analysis revealed a consistent annual increase in research output. The United States, United Kingdom, and Italy were the leading contributors. The top institution in this research was Assistance Publique Hopitaux, Paris. The journal containing the highest number of relevant publications was Toxins. Key frequently occurring keywords were 'stroke', 'cerebral palsy', 'adult spasticity', and 'upper extremity'. This study identified 12 clusters of keywords and 15 clusters of co-cited references, indicating the main focus areas and emerging themes in this field. This study comprehensively analyzed and summarized trends in BoNT-A research in the field of spasticity over the past 22 years.

The Relationship between Pain and Spasticity and Tell-Tale Signs of Pain in Children with Cerebral Palsy

Pain and quality of life are closely interrelated in children with cerebral palsy (CCP). Even though 67% of CCP experience pain, it is overlooked and untreated. In this study, our purpose was two-fold: first, to examine the relationship between pain and spasticity by evaluating the effects of AbobotulinumtoxinA/Dysport (BoNT), and second, to describe the symptoms and location of pain in CCP. The subjects were 22 CCP in at least moderate pain. They were evaluated for spasticity by the modified Ashworth and Tardieu scale and for pain by the r-FLACC and the pediatric pain profile. After one injection of BoNT, the subjects were re-evaluated. We found a significant reduction in pain, but no significant relationship between the reduction of pain and spasticity. We found no association between the dose of BoNT and pain or spasticity. Pain in the lower extremity was located primarily in the hip region. The effect of ultrasound-guided intermuscular injections of BoNT suggests that pain in CCP has an extra-articular component. We found that pain in CCP manifests as specific tell-tale signs and problems in daily living. In conclusion, we found no relationship between pain and spasticity. Signs and manifestations of pain are described in detail. Lower extremity (hip) pain seems to have a soft tissue/extra-articular component.

A practical guide to botulinum neurotoxin treatment of shoulder spasticity 2: Injection techniques, outcome measurement scales, and case studies

Introduction

Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) is a first-line treatment option for post-stroke spasticity, reducing pain and involuntary movements and helping to restore function. BoNT-A is frequently injected into the arm, the wrist, the hand, and/or the finger muscles but less often into the shoulder muscles, despite clinical trials demonstrating improvements in pain and function after shoulder BoNT-A injection.

Methods

In part 2 of this two-part practical guide, we present an experts' consensus on the choice of outcome measurement scales and goal-setting recommendations for BoNT-A in the treatment of shoulder spasticity to increase awareness of shoulder muscle injection with BoNT-A, alongside the more commonly injected upper limb muscles. Expert consensus was obtained from five European experts with a cumulative experience of more than 100 years of BoNT-A use in post-stroke spasticity. Case studies are included as examples of approaches taken in the treatment of shoulder spasticity.

Results

Although the velocity-dependent increase in muscle tone is often a focus of patient assessment, it is only one component of spasticity and should be assessed as part of a wider range of measurements. For outcome measurement following BoNT-A injection in shoulder muscles, shoulder-specific scales are recommended. Other scales to be considered include Pain Numerical Rating and/or global functioning, as well as the quality of life and global perception of benefit scores.Goal setting is an essential part of the multidisciplinary management process for spasticity; goals should be patient-centric, realistic, and achievable; functional-focused goal statements and a mixture of short- (3-6 month) and long-term (9-18 month) goals are recommended. These can be grouped into symptomatic, passive function, active function, involuntary movement, and global mobility.Clinical evaluation tools, goal setting, and outcome expectations for the multipattern treatment of shoulder spasticity with BoNT-A should be defined by the whole multidisciplinary team, ensuring patient and caregiver involvement.

Discussion

These recommendations will be of benefit to clinicians who may not be experienced in evaluating and treating spastic shoulders.

Safety and efficacy of MT10107 in post-stroke upper limb spasticity treatment: A phase I randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin type A injection is widely used treatment option for the treatment of upper limb spasticity in stroke patients. The purpose of this study was to explore the safety and efficacy of MT10107, a new botulinum toxin type A, in patients with post-stroke upper limb spasticity.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, double-blind, active drug-controlled, multi-center, phase I clinical trial. Thirty patients with post-stroke upper limb spasticity were received either MT10107 or onabotulinumtoxinA. Primary endpoint was change of modified Ashworth scale (MAS) score for wrist flexor from baseline to week 4. The secondary endpoints were changes of MAS scores for elbow and finger flexors, response rate, Disability Assessment Scale (DAS), and global assessment of treatment. The safety endpoints such as adverse events, vital signs, physical examination, and laboratory test were evaluated. The outcome measures were evaluated from baseline to week 4.

RESULTS

The primary endpoints were -1.07 ± 0.70 and -1.23 ± 0.56 for the MT10107 and onabotulinumtoxinA groups, respectively. The intergroup difference of change between the 2 groups was 0.17 (95% confidence interval -0.31 to 0.64, P = .5769). In secondary endpoints, both groups showed a significant improvement in both MAS and DAS. There was no significant between-group difference in all secondary endpoints and safety measures.

CONCLUSION

The safety and efficacy of MT10107 showed no significant difference compared to onabotulinumtoxinA in post-stroke upper limb spasticity treatment.

AbobotulinumtoxinA Doses in Upper and Lower Limb Spasticity: A Systematic Literature Review

Disabling limb spasticity can result from stroke, traumatic brain injury or other disorders causing upper motor neuron lesions such as multiple sclerosis. Clinical studies have shown that abobotulinumtoxinA (AboBoNT-A) therapy reduces upper and lower limb spasticity in adults. However, physicians may administer potentially inadequate doses, given the lack of consensus on adjusting dose according to muscle volume, the wide dose ranges in the summary of product characteristics or cited in the published literature, and/or the high quantity of toxin available for injection. Against this background, a systematic literature review based on searches of MEDLINE and Embase (via Ovid SP) and three relevant conferences (2018 to 2020) was conducted in November 2020 to examine AboBoNT-A doses given to adults for upper or lower limb muscles affected by spasticity of any etiology in clinical and real-world evidence studies. From the 1781 unique records identified from the electronic databases and conference proceedings screened, 49 unique studies represented across 56 publications (53 full-text articles, 3 conference abstracts) were eligible for inclusion. Evidence from these studies suggested that AboBoNT-A dose given per muscle in clinical practice varies considerably, with only a slight trend toward a relationship between dose and muscle volume. Expert-based consensus is needed to inform recommendations for standardizing AboBoNT-A treatment initiation doses based on muscle volume.

A practical guide to botulinum neurotoxin treatment of shoulder spasticity 1: Anatomy, physiology, and goal setting

Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) is a first-line treatment option for post-stroke spasticity, reducing pain and involuntary movements and helping to restore function. BoNT-A is frequently injected into the arm, wrist, hand and/or finger muscles, but less often into the shoulder muscles, despite clinical trials demonstrating improvements in pain and function after shoulder BoNT-A injection. In part 1 of this two-part practical guide, we present an experts' consensus on the use of BoNT-A injections in the multi-pattern treatment of shoulder spasticity to increase awareness of shoulder muscle injection with BoNT-A, alongside the more commonly injected upper limb muscles. Expert consensus was obtained from five European experts with a cumulative experience of more than 100 years of BoNT-A use in post-stroke spasticity. A patient-centered approach was proposed by the expert consensus: to identify which activities are limited by the spastic shoulder and consider treating the muscles that are involved in hindering those activities. Two patterns of shoulder spasticity were identified: for Pattern A (adduction, elevation, flexion and internal rotation of the shoulder), the expert panel recommended injecting the pectoralis major, teres major and subscapularis muscles; in most cases injecting only the pectoralis major and the teres major is sufficient for the first injection cycle; for Pattern B (abduction or adduction, extension and internal rotation of the shoulder), the panel recommended injecting the posterior part of the deltoid, the teres major and the latissimus dorsi in most cases. It is important to consider the local guidelines and product labels, as well as discussions within the multidisciplinary, multiprofessional team when deciding to inject shoulder muscles with BoNT-A. The choice of shoulder muscles for BoNT-A injection can be based on spastic pattern, but ideally should also firstly consider the functional limitation and patient expectations in order to establish better patient-centered treatment goals. These recommendations will be of benefit for clinicians who may not be experienced in evaluating and treating spastic shoulders.

Pharmacological management of muscle spasticity

Background: Muscle spasticity is a neurologic disorder, which is considered one of the positive signs of upper motor neuron diseases. Spasticity is common after brain or spinal cord injury. Since spasticity results in tendon retraction, muscle weakness, pain, ankylosis, and disability in activities of daily living, treatment is warranted.Current Concepts: Spasticity is usually assessed using the Modified Ashworth Scale or Modified Tardieu Scale. It is treated with various methods, including physical therapy, occupational therapy, orthosis, medication, and surgery. Pharmacological management should be selected according to the location and severity of the symptom and includes oral medications, chemical nerve block, and intrathecal baclofen pump insertion. Oral medications include baclofen, benzodiazepine, dantrolene, and tizanidine. Chemoneurolysis of spasticity is done with botulinum toxin or a mixture of phenol and alcohol.Discussion and Conclusion: Since muscle spasticity affects motor function and activities of daily living, understanding of this symptom and choosing an optimal treatment are necessary. Pharmacologic treatments should be administered with caution especially with the side effects. Optimal treatment of spasticity will bring the best neurological outcome for the patients.

Comparative Effectiveness of Botulinum Toxin Injections and Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Post-Stroke Spasticity: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The anti-spasticity efficacy of botulinum toxin (BoNT) injection has been well established for patients with chronic stroke; however, extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), i.e. focused shockwave (FSW) and radial shockwave (RSW), has recently been applied. We aimed to investigate the comparative effectiveness of BoNT vs. ESWT in the reduction of spasticity among stroke survivors.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from the earliest record to September 2021 for randomized controlled trials. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) on the reduction of the Modified Ashworth Scale before or at the 6th post-treatment week (short-term) and between the 7th and 12th weeks (mid-term) after the intervention were calculated. Ranking probabilities of the WMD were simulated to determine which treatment had the potential to possess the best effectiveness. inplasy.com registration: INPLASY202170018.

FINDINGS

A total of 33 studies comprising 1,930 patients were enrolled. The network meta-analysis revealed that BoNT injections, FSW and RSW were better in spasticity reduction than the control treatment(s) at the short term, with WMDs of -0.69 (95% CI, -0.87 to -0.50), -0.36 (95% CI, -0.69 to -0.03) and -0.62 (95% CI, -0.84 to -0.40), respectively. Likewise, mid-term effects of BoNT injections, FSW and RSW also revealed superiority, with WMDs of -0.44 (95% CI, -0.62 to -0.26), -0.74 (95% CI, -1.26 to -0.23) and -0.79 (95% CI, -1.07 to -0.51), respectively. Ranking probability analysis revealed that RSW had the highest probability of being the best treatment for spasticity reduction at the short-term (62.2%) and mid-term (72.3%) periods during the follow up.

INTERPRETATION

BoNT injections and ESWT are effective in alleviating post-stroke spasticity at the mid-term. The effectiveness of ESWT was comparable to BoNT injections, and RSW had the potential to be the best treatment for spasticity reduction among the three treatment options. More prospective trials incorporating head-to-head comparisons of BoNT injections vs. ESWT are needed to validate the role of ESWT in reducing post-stroke spasticity.

FUNDING

The current research project was supported by (1) National Taiwan University Hospital, Bei-Hu Branch; (2) Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 106-2314-B-002-180-MY3 and 109-2314-B-002-114-MY3); 3) Taiwan Society of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Effect of muscle selection for botulinum neurotoxin treatment on spasticity in patients with post-stroke elbow flexor muscle over-activity: an observational prospective study

PURPOSE/AIM

To investigate the effect of muscle selection for botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) treatment on spasticity in patients with post-stroke elbow flexor muscle over-activity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chronic stroke patients with a deforming spastic paresis in the upper limb (elbow flexion with forearm pronation) who were injected BoNT-A into at least one of elbow flexor muscles (brachialis, brachioradialis, and biceps brachii) were included in this prospective observational study. The main outcome measure was spasticity angle by Tardieu Scale recorded at pre-treatment and week 4 after treatment.

RESULTS

Three muscle selection groups with sufficient sample size for statistical analysis were able to be created; brachialis (n = 14), biceps brachii (n = 21), and brachialis plus brachioradialis (n = 11). Although there was a significant improvement in spasticity angle within all groups over time (p < 0.05), the change in spasticity angle was not different between the groups (p > 0.05 for each pairwise comparison). However, the magnitude of the change in spasticity angle was larger in the groups in which brachialis was preferred.

CONCLUSIONS

In stroke patients with a spontaneous spastic posture of elbow flexion and forearm pronation, targeting brachialis for BoNT-A injection seems more effective in reducing the severity of spasticity.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NO

NCT04036981.

Goal Attainment: A Clinically Meaningful Measure of Success of Botulinum Toxin-A Treatment for Lower Limb Spasticity in Ambulatory Patients

Objectives

The objectives of this study were to evaluate whether botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) treatment for lower limb spasticity leads to patient goal attainment and identify factors associated with positive goal attainment and to assess the effect of BoNT-A treatment on patients’ gait.

Design

Retrospective cohort study between June 2014 and February 2019.

Setting

Public outpatient spasticity clinic in a tertiary hospital.

Participants

Thirty patients (N=30; 50% female; average age, 50.5y) with lower limb spasticity of heterogenous etiologies (96.7% cerebral±spinal origin and 3.3% isolated spinal origin); 73.3% (N=22) of patients had previously received BoNT-A treatment.

Interventions

BoNT-A injection to lower limb muscles.

Main Outcome Measures

The primary outcome measure was goal attainment measured using Goal Attainment Scaling. The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) was used to assess spasticity. Gait was characterized by spatiotemporal parameters.

Results

Fifty-six treatment episodes were analyzed and showed that BoNT-A treatment resulted in a significant reduction in spasticity (pretreatment MAS=3.18±0.73; posttreatment MAS=2.27±0.89; P<.001) with no associated change in gait parameters. Logistic regression revealed that most patients (74.1%) achieved all of their goals, with younger patients having a high likelihood of goal attainment regardless of their gait profile identified by latent profile analysis of the gait parameters. Patients considered to have a low functioning gait profile demonstrated a significantly greater likelihood of goal attainment than patients with the other gait profiles combined (odds ratio, 45.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-1602.1; P=.036). Chronic spasticity and pretreatment severity of spasticity (MAS) and its reduction were not associated with likelihood of goal attainment.

Conclusions

The success and efficacy of BoNT-A treatment in improving patient perceived gait quality and reducing the negative symptoms of spasticity were best measured using Goal Attainment Scaling. The study emphasizes the importance of measuring patient goals as a clinical outcome. Gait parameters were most informative when used collectively to classify patients based on their overall gait profile, which assisted in identifying differences between patients’ likelihood of goal attainment after treatment.

The Use of Botulinum Toxin for Treatment of Spasticity

Spasticity is one component of the upper motor neuron (UMN) syndrome resulting from a multitude of neurologic conditions, such as stroke, brain injury, spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, and cerebral palsy. It is clinically recognized as a phenomenon of velocity-dependent increase in resistance, i.e., hypertonia. Recent advances in the pathophysiology of spasticity improve our understanding of mechanisms underlying this complex phenomenon and its relations to other components of UMN syndrome (weakness and disordered motor control), as well as the resultant clinical problems. This theoretical framework provides a foundation to set up treatment goals and to guide goal-oriented clinical assessment and treatment. Among a spectrum of treatment options, botulinum toxin (BoNT) therapy is the preferred treatment for focal spasticity. The evidence is very robust that BoNT therapy effectively reduces spasticity; however, it does not improve voluntary movement. In this chapter, we highlight a few issues on how to achieve the best clinical outcomes of BoNT therapy, such as dosing, dilution, guidance techniques, adjunctive therapies, early treatment, repeated injections, and central effects, as well as the ways to improve motor function in selected subgroups of patients with spasticity. We also discuss the reasons of poor responses to BoNT therapy and when not to use BoNT therapy.

The Effect of Repeated abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®) Injections on Walking Velocity in Persons with Spastic Hemiparesis Caused by Stroke or Traumatic Brain Injury

Background

Botulinum toxin (BoNT) injections were shown to improve muscle tone of limbs in patients with spasticity. However, limited data are available regarding the effects of repeated BoNT injections on walking ability.

Objective

To assess changes in walking velocity (WV), step length, and cadence under different test conditions after repeated treatment with abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT‐A; Dysport) in spastic lower limb muscles.

Design

Secondary analysis of an open‐label, multiple‐cycle extension (National Clinical Trials number NCT01251367) to a phase III, double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled, single‐treatment cycle study, in adults with chronic hemiparesis (NCT01249404).

Setting

Fifty‐two centers across Australia, Belgium, the Czech Republic, France, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovakia, and the United States.

Patients

352 Ambulatory adults (18‐80 years) with spastic hemiparesis and gait dysfunction caused by stroke or traumatic brain injury, with a comfortable barefoot WV of 0.1 to 0.8 m/s.

Interventions

Up to four aboBoNT‐A treatment cycles, administered to spastic lower limb muscles.

Main Outcome Measurements

Changes from baseline in comfortable and maximal barefoot and with shoes WV (m/s), step length (m/step), and cadence (steps/minutes).

Results

At Week 12 after four injections, WV improved by 0.08 to 0.10 m/s, step length by 0.03 to 0.04 m/step, and cadence by 3.9 to 6.2 steps/minutes depending on test condition (all P < .0001 to .0003 vs baseline). More patients (7% to 17%) became unlimited community ambulators (WV ≥0.8 m/s) across test conditions compared with baseline, with 39% of 151 patients classified as unlimited community ambulators in at least one test condition and 17% in all four test conditions.

Conclusions

Clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvements in WV, step length, and cadence under all four test conditions were observed in patients with spastic hemiparesis after each aboBoNT‐A treatment cycle.

The Effects of Botulinum Toxin Injections on Spasticity and Motor Performance in Chronic Stroke with Spastic Hemiplegia

Spastic muscles are weak muscles. It is known that muscle weakness is linked to poor motor performance. Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections are considered as the first-line treatment for focal spasticity. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively investigate the effects of BoNT injections on force control of spastic biceps brachii muscles in stroke survivors. Ten stroke survivors with spastic hemiplegia (51.7 ± 11.5 yrs; 5 men) who received 100 units of incobotulinumtoxinA or onabotulinumtoxinA to the biceps brachii muscles participated in this study. Spasticity assessment (Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and reflex torque) and muscle strength of elbow flexors, as well as motor performance assessment (force variability of submaximal elbow flexion) were performed within one week before (pre-injection) and 3~4 weeks (3-wk) after BoNT injections. As expected, BoNT injections reduced the MAS score and reflex torque, and elbow flexor strength on the spastic paretic side. However, motor performance remained within similar level before and after injections. There was no change in muscle strength or motor performance on the contralateral arm after BoNT injections. The results of this study provide evidence that BoNT injections can reduce spasticity and muscle strength, while motor performance of the weakened spastic muscle remains unchanged.

Long-Term Effects With Potential Clinical Importance of Botulinum Toxin Type-A on Mechanics of Muscles Exposed

Botulinum toxin type-A (BTX-A) is widely used for spasticity management and mechanically aims at reducing passive resistance at the joint and widening joint range of movement. However, recent experiments on acute BTX-A effects showed that the injected rat tibialis anterior (TA) muscle’s passive forces increased, and the length range of active force exertion (l_range) did not change. Additionally, BTX-A was shown to spread into non-injected muscles in the compartment and affect their mechanics. Whether those effects persist in the long term is highly important, but unknown. The aim was to test the following hypotheses with experiments conducted in the anterior crural compartment of the rat: In the long term, BTX-A (1) maintains l_range, (2) increases passive forces of the injected TA muscle, and (3) spreads into non-injected extensor digitorum longus (EDL) and the extensor hallucis longus (EHL) muscles, also affecting their active and passive forces. Male Wistar rats were divided into two groups: BTX-A and Control (0.1 units of BTX-A or only saline was injected into the TA). Isometric forces of the muscles were measured simultaneously 1-month post-injection. The targeted TA was lengthened, whereas the non-targeted EDL and EHL were kept at constant length. Hydroxyproline analysis was done to quantify changes in the collagen content of studied muscles. Two-way ANOVA test (for muscle forces, factors: TA length and animal group) and unpaired t or Mann-Whitney U test (for l_range and collagen content, where appropriate) were used for statistical analyses (P < 0.05). BTX-A caused significant effects. TA: active forces decreased (maximally by 75.2% at short and minimally by 48.3%, at long muscle lengths), l_range decreased (by 22.9%), passive forces increased (by 12.3%), and collagen content increased (approximately threefold). EDL and EHL: active forces decreased (up to 66.8%), passive force increased (minimally by 62.5%), and collagen content increased (approximately twofold). Therefore, hypothesis 1 was rejected and 2 and 3 were confirmed indicating that previously reported acute BTX-A effects persist and advance in the long term. A narrower l_range and an elevated passive resistance of the targeted muscle are unintended mechanical effects, whereas spread of BTX-A into other compartmental muscles indicates the presence of uncontrolled mechanical effects.

Real-life outcomes in spasticity management: features affecting goal achievement

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Spasticity is a complex and common condition but there is a lack of 'real-world' data on goal setting and spasticity treatment, as well as identifying those features that might be associated with goal achievement. Our aim was to provide such data.

METHODS

Prospective attenders at a multi-disciplinary spasticity clinic over 2 years followed for consecutive appointments. Patient demographics and doses of botulinum toxin injected were documented. Main outcome was achievement of a primary goal but secondary goals were also recorded. Independent variables were examined for association to the outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 606 goals were set in 224 patients. The majority (75.2%) were achieved with similar levels across active (72.5%), passive (75.7%) and pain (78.6%) goals. However, in terms of the primary goal, active primary goals were achieved less frequently (59.7%) than non-active primary goal (74.2%). A logistic regression confirmed that this was the only independent variable associated with primary goal achievement. The majority of patients (61.6%) required changes to their treatment between appointments, irrespective of time since diagnosis, age or aetiology.

CONCLUSIONS

Most goals set in spasticity clinic can be achieved irrespective of type of goal. However, active goals may be harder to accomplish when they are set as a primary goal. This may reflect the desire of individuals to prioritise a desirable goal rather than one that is achievable. While goal setting is important in the management of spasticity patients, very few patient or treatment factors are associated with outcome prediction. Further work needs to identify features that may predict successful outcome.

Composite active range of motion (CXA) and relationship with active function in upper and lower limb spastic paresis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate a novel composite measure of active range of motion (X_A) and determine whether this measure correlates with active function.

DESIGN

Post hoc analysis of two randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies with open-label extensions exploring changes in active function with abobotulinumtoxinA.

SETTING

Tertiary rehabilitation centers in Australia, Europe, and the United States.

SUBJECTS

Adults with upper (n = 254) or lower (n = 345) limb spastic paresis following stroke or brain trauma.

INTERVENTIONS

AbobotulinumtoxinA (⩽5 treatment cycles) in the upper or lower limb.

MAIN MEASURES

X_A was used to calculate a novel composite measure (CX_A), defined as the sum of X_A against elbow, wrist, and extrinsic finger flexors (upper limb) or soleus and gastrocnemius muscles (lower limb). Active function was assessed by the Modified Frenchay Scale and 10-m comfortable barefoot walking speed in the upper limb and lower limb, respectively. Correlations between CX_A and active function at Weeks 4 and 12 of open-label cycles were explored.

RESULTS

CX_A and active function were moderately correlated in the upper limb (P < 0.0001-0.0004, r = 0.476-0.636) and weakly correlated in the lower limb (P < 0.0001-0.0284, r = 0.186-0.285) at Weeks 4 and 12 of each open-label cycle. Changes in CX_A and active function were weakly correlated only in the upper limb (Cycle 2 Week 12, P = 0.0160, r = 0.213; Cycle 3 Week 4, P = 0.0031, r = 0.296). Across cycles, CX_A improvements peaked at Week 4, while functional improvements peaked at Week 12.

CONCLUSION

CX_A is a valid measure for functional impairments in spastic paresis. CX_A improvements following abobotulinumtoxinA injection correlated with and preceded active functional improvements.

Botulinum Toxin Type A for Upper Limb Spasticity in Poststroke Patients: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Botulinum toxin type A is considered to be an effective antispasmodic in recent years. We assess the effectiveness of botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of poststroke spasticity in the upper extremity using a meta-analysis.

METHODS

We searched several databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane database for relevant studies, up until October 2017. All randomized controlled trials of botulinum toxin type A treat poststroke upper limb spasticity published were included. The primary outcome measure was modified ashworth score at the elbow, finger and wrist, pain score, and barthel index.

RESULTS

Ten randomized controlled trials were identified and reported sufficient data for inclusion in the pooled analysis (n = 950). The results of modified ashworth score at different joints, pain score, barthel index showed no difference was found in the effectiveness of botulinum toxin type A compared with placebo in the treatment of the upper limb spasticity after stroke. But modified ashworth score at the elbow was improver in Dysport subgroups (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -.39, 95%CI = -.67 to -.10, P = .008) compared with Botox subgroups (SMD = .08, 95%CI = -.68 to .83, P = .84).

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis of these studies showed that the overall effectiveness of botulinum toxin type A does not seem to differ from placebo for poststroke Patients. But the meta-analysis yielded a favorable effect of Dysport compared with placebo based on 4 trials.

Non-invasive treatment of patients with upper extremity spasticity following stroke using paired trans-spinal and peripheral direct current stimulation

Background

Muscle spasticity is a common impediment to motor recovery in patients with chronic stroke. Standard-of-care treatments such as botulinum toxin injections can temporarily relieve muscle stiffness and pain associated with spasticity, but often at the expense of increased muscle weakness. Recent preclinical investigations of a non-invasive treatment that pairs trans-spinal direct current stimulation and peripheral nerve direct current stimulation (tsDCS+pDCS) provided promising data for a novel approach based on bioelectronic medicine for the treatment of patients with post-stroke spasticity.

Methods

Twenty-six patients with upper limb hemiparesis and wrist spasticity at least 6 months after their initial stroke participated in this single-blind crossover design study to test whether tsDCS+pDCS reduces chronic upper-extremity spasticity. Subjects received five consecutive daily sessions (20 min of stimulation or sham) of anodal tsDCS+pDCS, separated by a one-week washout period. The sham condition always preceded the active condition. Clinical and objective measures of spasticity and motor function were collected before and after each condition, and for five weeks after the completion of the active intervention.

Results

Subjects treated with active tsDCS+pDCS demonstrated significant reductions in both Modified Tardieu Scale scores (summed across the upper limb, P < 0.05), and in objective torque measures (Nm) of the spastic catch response at the wrist flexor (P < 0.05), compared to the sham condition. Motor function also improved significantly (measured by the Fugl-Meyer and Wolf Motor Function Test; P < 0.05 for both tests) after active treatment.

Conclusions

tsDCS+pDCS intervention alone significantly reduced upper limb spasticity in participants with stroke. Decreased spasticity was persistent for five weeks after treatment, and was accompanied by improved motor function even though patients were unsupervised and there was no prescribed activity or training during that interval.

Trial registration

NCT03080454, March 15, 2017.

Use of botulinum toxin for movement disorders

The term movement disorders encompasses all disorders hypokinetic and hyperkinetic, which were previously known as extrapyramidal syndromes. With the definition of movement disorders and their diagnostic criteria and classifications, new studies for therapeutics could be performed. New drugs were launched, functional neurosurgery was developed, and the introduction of botulinum toxin (BoNT) for hyperkinesias was introduced. BoNT is an important therapy for dystonia, tics, myoclonus, and tremors. The aim of this review is to present the new and well-established uses of BoNT for movement disorders.

Efficacy of botulinum toxin in modifying spasticity to improve walking and quality of life in post-stroke lower limb spasticity - a randomized double-blind placebo controlled study

Background

Post-stroke lower limb spasticity (PSLLS) has a prevalence of 28–37%. PSLLS can cause difficulty in walking and reduce quality of life (QOL). Post stroke spasticity impairs the ability to intervene to improve walking ability. Botulinum Toxin A (BT) is an effective intervention for focal spasticity, but its use is currently restricted in many countries by their reimbursement system stating that the evidence for improvement in walking and quality of life (QOL) is not robust for treatment in the lower limb. This randomized control trial (RCT) will investigate the effectiveness of BT in modifying spasticity, and improving functioning (mobility, walking, activities of daily living (ADL’s) and QOL.

Methods/design

A double-blind placebo-controlled trial injection will assess the effect of BT compared with a placebo (normal saline) in a sample of n = 94 patients. Following treatment of spasticity measured by Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), the primary outcome of gait velocity will be measured by i) Gait Rite (Electronic Walkway); ii) walking by 2 Min Walk Test; iii) balance by Berg Balance Scale; mobility by iv) Timed Up and Go (TUG); v) lower limb function by ABILICO; vi) patient related goal by Goal Attainment Scale (GAS); vii) QOL by SF 12 (Rand version); viii) activities of daily living by the Functional Autonomy Measurement System (SMAF). There will be an associated health economic analysis.

Discussion

The study methodology is based on our systematic review 2026 studies, which concluded the evidence for improving mobility following use of BT to reduce spasticity was not robust. The results of this study could establish the use of BT in improving gait and lower limb function in PSLLS. This study could provide the evidence needed for reimbursement schemes to consider and changes to its funding policy for BT in PSLLS.

Trial registration

The trial is registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trails Registry (ANZCTR)-ANZCTRN12617001603303. Registered 07/12/2017.

Botulinum toxin treatment of spasticity targeted to muscle endplates: an international, randomised, evaluator-blinded study comparing two different botulinum toxin injection strategies for the treatment of upper limb spasticity

OBJECTIVES

The therapeutic effects of botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) are well documented in upper limb spasticity. However, several factors may influence treatment efficacy, including targeting of neuromuscular junctions (NMJs). We examined whether NMJ-targeted BoNT injections were non-inferior, in terms of efficacy, to current injection practices.

DESIGN

Open-label prospective evaluator-blinded study.

SETTING

Conducted across 20 medical centres in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden (24 September 2012 to 11 March 2015).

PARTICIPANTS

Aged ˃18 years with upper limb spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale [MAS] score of 2 or 3) following stroke or traumatic brain injury, had received ≥2 consecutive BoNT-A treatment cycles (the latest of which was abobotulinumtoxinA [aboBoNT-A]) and needed BoNT-A retreatment (same modality as previous cycle). Patients requiring aboBoNT-A doses >800units were excluded. In total, 88 patients were randomised (intention-to-treat [ITT] population), most were male (n=58/88, 65.9%) and 54/88 (61.4%) completed the study (per protocol [PP] population).

INTERVENTIONS

Randomisation (1:1) to receive a single dose of aboBoNT-A (≤800 U) according to either current clinical practice (300 U/mL) or as an NMJ-targeted injection (100 U/mL).

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

Proportion of patients with a ≥1 level reduction from baseline in MAS score at week 4 post-injection (responders).

RESULTS

In the ITT population, the proportion of responders at elbow flexors was 72.7% in the current practice group and 56.8% in the NMJ-targeted group (adjusted difference -0.1673 [95% CIs: -0.3630 to 0.0284]; p=0.0986). Similar results were observed in the PP population (69.0% vs 68.0%, respectively, adjusted difference 0.0707 [-0.1948 to 0.3362]; p=0.6052).

CONCLUSIONS

Owing to the limited number of participants, non-inferiority of NMJ-targeted injections could not be determined. However, there was no statistical difference between groups. Larger studies are needed confirm whether the two techniques offer comparable efficacy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01682148.

Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A for Limb Spasticity after Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background

Inconsistent data have been reported for the effectiveness of intramuscular botulinum toxin type A (BTXA) in patients with limb spasticity after stroke. This meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of BTXA in adult patients with upper and lower limb spasticity after stroke.

Methods

An electronic search was performed to select eligible RCTs in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library through December 2018. Summary standard mean differences (SMDs) and relative risk (RR) values with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were employed to assess effectiveness and safety outcomes, respectively.

Results

Twenty-seven RCTs involving a total of 2,793 patients met the inclusion criteria, including 16 and 9 trials assessing upper and lower limb spasticity cases, respectively. For upper limb spasticity, BTXA therapy significantly improved the levels of muscle tone (SMD=-0.76; 95% CI -0.97 to -0.55; P<0.001), physician global assessment (SMD=0.51; 95% CI 0.35-0.67; P<0.001), and disability assessment scale (SMD=-0.30; 95% CI -0.40 to -0.20; P<0.001), with no significant effects on active upper limb function (SMD=0.49; 95% CI -0.08 to 1.07; P=0.093) and adverse events (RR=1.18; 95% CI 0.72-1.93; P=0.509). For lower limb spasticity, BTXA therapy was associated with higher Fugl-Meyer score (SMD=5.09; 95%CI 2.16-8.01; P=0.001), but had no significant effects on muscle tone (SMD=-0.12; 95% CI -0.83 to 0.59; P=0.736), gait speed (SMD=0.06; 95% CI -0.02 to 0.15; P=0.116), and adverse events (RR=1.01; 95% CI 0.71-1.45; P=0.949).

Conclusions

BTXA improves muscle tone, physician global assessment, and disability assessment scale in upper limb spasticity and increases the Fugl-Meyer score in lower limb spasticity.

IncobotulinumtoxinA Efficacy and Safety in Adults with Upper-Limb Spasticity Following Stroke: Results from the Open-Label Extension Period of a Phase 3 Study

Introduction

The objective of the study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of repeated incobotulinumtoxinA injections for the treatment of upper-limb post-stroke spasticity in adults.

Methods

Adults 18–80 years of age with post-stroke upper-limb spasticity who completed the 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled main period (MP) of a phase 3 trial (NCT01392300) were eligible to enrol in the 36-week open-label extension period (OLEX). The OLEX included three treatment cycles at fixed 12-week injection intervals; subjects were injected with 400 U incobotulinumtoxinA into the affected upper limb. Efficacy assessments included evaluation of muscle tone using the Ashworth Scale (AS) and the Global Impression of Change Scale (GICS) assessed by the investigator, subject, and caregiver. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was monitored throughout the OLEX.

Results

A total of 296 of 299 subjects (99.0%) who completed the MP received incobotulinumtoxinA in the OLEX, and 248 subjects completed the 36-week OLEX. The proportion of subjects with at least a 1-point improvement in AS score from each incobotulinumtoxinA treatment to the respective 4-week post-injection visit ranged by cycle from 52.3% to 59.2% for wrist flexors, 49.1% to 52.3% for elbow flexors, 59.8% to 64.5% for finger flexors, 35.5% to 41.2% for thumb flexors, and 37.4% to 39.9% for forearm pronators (P < 0.0001 for all). Over 90% of subjects were assessed by the investigator to be at least minimally improved (4 weeks post-injection) on the GICS during each injection cycle; 61.0% in the 1st cycle, 58.2% in the 2nd cycle, and 57.4% in the 3rd cycle were considered much improved or very much improved on the GICS. Three percent of subjects (9/296) reported treatment-related AEs; the most frequently reported were pain in the extremity (n = 2, 0.7%) and constipation (n = 2, 0.7%). Serious AEs were reported by 22 subjects (7.4%); however, none were considered treatment-related.

Conclusions

Repeated injections of incobotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of post-stroke upper-limb spasticity led to significant improvements in muscle tone and investigator’s global impression of change. Treatment was well tolerated, with no serious treatment-related AEs.

Funding

Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH.

[Medical care of patients with spasticity following stroke : Evaluation of the treatment situation in Germany with focus on the use of botulinum toxin]

BACKGROUND

Upper limb spasticity is a common complication following stroke. Cohort studies found 19% of post-stroke patients had upper limb spasticity at 3 months and 38% of patients at 12 months. For focal spasticity, intramuscular injections of botulinum toxin are indicated. In Germany, it is assumed that patients with the described indication are undersupplied with botulinum toxin.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study is to evaluate the medical care of patients with upper limb spasticity post-stroke with the focus on the use of botulinum toxin as one treatment option.

METHODS

A standardized questionnaire was developed and a postal survey of a representative national random sample of 800 neurologists to capture the actual medical care situation.

RESULTS

The response rate amounted to 37% (n = 292). 59% of the neurologists surveyed had never used botulinum toxin. In total, 87% of neurologists noticed barriers regarding the use of botulinum toxin, where the amount of the doctor's remuneration in 40% and the lack of reimbursement of costs in off-label use in 60% were the most commonly used answers. The achievement of an advanced training in using botulinum toxin was also stated as a general obstacle for resident neurologists.

DISCUSSION

Due to a response rate of 37% for the postal survey a selection bias cannot be excluded. Although botulinum toxin is recommended in the national treatment guidelines, many neurologists do not use botulinum toxin. The reasons can be seen from the barriers described.

[Treatment goals in patients with post-stroke upper limb spasticity following injection of botulinum toxin A : Results of the German-Austrian subgroup of the ULIS-II study]

BACKGROUND

The ULIS-II was an international cohort study (NCT01020500) evaluating current treatment of upper limb spasticity in post-stroke adult patients with botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) in real-life practice.

OBJECTIVE

Post hoc analysis to compare current management of post-stroke adult patients regarding goal setting and attainment with BoNT-A in Germany (D) and Austria (A) with the full cohort of ULIS-II.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The ULIS-II was a global, open-label, prospective, multicenter observational study with 2 visits conducted in 84 centers worldwide. A total of 468 patients aged ≥18 years with post-stroke upper limb spasticity were included. The primary outcome measure was the responder rate defined as achievement of a goal attainment scale (GAS) score of 0, 1 or 2 after 1 cycle of BoNT-A.

RESULTS

A total of 57 patients from D/A were included in the efficacy analysis. The number of patients in D/A and the full cohort achieving the primary (78.9% vs. 79.6%) and secondary treatment goal (76.8% vs. 75.6%), respectively, was comparable. Deviating from the full cohort, the most common primary treatment goal in D/A was related to impairment (33.3%). Compared to baseline there was a marked reduction in concomitant therapies at the follow-up visit after 3-5 months in the D/A group: patients receiving oral anti-spastic medication 61.4% vs. 40.4%, positioning 50.9% vs. 36.8% and splinting 43.9% vs. 31.6%. Injection control techniques were less frequently used in the D/A group compared to the global study cohort (electrical stimulation: 26.3% vs. 45.8% and electromyography: 12.3% vs. 29.2%). No adverse events were documented in the D/A cohort.

CONCLUSION

A single injection of BoNT-A in adult patients with post-stroke spasticity of the arm led to a high response rate of approximately 80% in both cohorts. The BoNT-A injections in post-stroke adult patients contributed to an improvement in the daily life of patients and their carers beyond simple reduction of muscle tone or spasticity.

Botulinum Toxin Conditioning Enhances Motor Axon Regeneration in Mouse and Human Preclinical Models

BACKGROUND

Peripheral axon regeneration is improved when the nerve lesion under consideration has recently been preceded by another nerve injury. This is known as the conditioning lesion effect (CLE). While the CLE is one of the most robust and well characterized means to enhance motor axon regeneration in experimental models, it is not considered a clinically feasible strategy. A pharmacological means to re-produce the CLE is highly desirable.

OBJECTIVE

To test whether chemodenervation with a clinical grade formulation of botulinum toxin A (BoTX) would be sufficient to reproduce the CLE.

METHODS

We examined the effects of a 1-week preconditioning administration of BoTX on motor axon regrowth in both a mouse tibial nerve injury and human embryonic stem cell (hESC)-based model. We assessed neuronal reinnervation in vivo (mice) with retrograde tracers and histological analysis of peripheral nerve tissue after injections into the triceps surae muscle group. We assessed motor neuron neurite outgrowth in vitro (hESC) after incubation in BoTX by immunohistochemistry and morphometric analysis.

RESULTS

We found that BoTX conditioning treatment significantly enhanced outgrowth of both murine motor axons in vivo and human MN neurites in vitro.

CONCLUSIONS

BoTX preconditioning represents a pharmacological candidate approach to enhance motor axon regeneration in specific clinical scenarios such as nerve transfer surgery. Further studies are needed to elucidate the molecular mechanism.

Does botulinum toxin treatment improve upper limb active function?

BACKGROUND

Spasticity following lesions of the central nervous system such as stroke is a major cause of impairment and disability, especially when it affects the upper limb, and can be focally relieved by intramuscular injections of botulinum toxin (BT). Functional improvements of the affected upper limb after a BT focal treatment remain controversial.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess the functional effects of BT treatment on upper-limb spasticity in the literature, identify flaws and deficiencies in proving these effects and propose leads for future trials.

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE and Cochrane databases for trials, reviews and meta-analyses assessing the effect of BT injection in upper-limb spasticity. This was a non-systematic narrative review, and the selection of articles was based on the authors' expertise. The review focused on stroke-related spasticity and disability.

RESULTS

Patients' therapeutic targets involved use of the disability assessment scale (DAS) or goal attainment scale (GAS). Impairments and passive function goals prevailed for active function and participation and were more frequently achieved for the former than the latter. Meta-analyses showed no to mild effect sizes for improvement in upper-limb function but failed to show higher and/or better use of the paretic upper limb in activities of daily living after BT injection.

CONCLUSION

BT injections for impairment and passive function are related to improved kinematic parameters; however, the relation between relief of spasticity and improved upper-limb activity has not been established. Possible explanations for the lack of functional effect in studies are first, disability is mainly due to muscle weakness rather than spasticity, so patients with the best underlying motricity may benefit the most from BT injections; second, assessment methods may not be adapted to screen eligible patients; third, most studies' endpoints were at 4 to 12 weeks after a single injection, but repeated treatment sessions might be needed to observe functional outcome on the upper limbs; and finally, the association of rehabilitation programs or non-pharmacological treatments may enhance the functional effects of BT injections.

Benefits and Risks of Non-Approved Injection Regimens for Botulinum Toxins in Spasticity

Spasticity with muscle paresis and loss of dexterity is a common feature of upper motor neuron syndrome due to injuries or the pyramidal tract in several neurological conditions. Botulinum toxin type A has been considered the gold standard treatment for spasticity and movement disorders, with efficacy, reversibility, and low prevalence of complications. During the last 30 years, thousands of studies of its use have been performed, but few guidelines are available. Therefore, there is great variability in both the doses and intervals of administration and the approaches taken by clinicians with considerable experience in spasticity and movement disorder treatment. In the present review article, we provide a short overview of the benefits and risks of non-approved injection regimens and doses for botulinum toxins, focusing on the treatment of post-stroke spasticity, where there is great interest in the potential for increasing the number of treatment/years and the dose of botulinum toxin treatment for subjects with upper and lower limb spasticity. However, many doubts exist regarding antibody development and possible adverse effects.

Therapy influences goal attainment following botulinum neurotoxin injection for focal spasticity in adults with neurological conditions

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether therapy influenced goal attainment following botulinum toxin (BoNT-A) injection for focal spasticity in adults with neurological conditions.

METHODS

A prospective observational cohort study conducted in a large metropolitan spasticity clinic on adults with focal spasticity of any origin. Participants were provided with a therapy programme, designed to maximise therapeutic outcome. The primary outcome measure was Goal Attainment Scaling. To measure adherence, participants completed a therapy-recording tool each day. Goal attainment, and the rate of adherence to the therapy programme, was evaluated after 10 weeks.

RESULTS

Active indications for BoNT-A treatment made up the majority of the goals (80.30%). Goals were achieved in 43/76 cases (56.60%; 95% CI = 42.40 to 69.80%). Therapy adherence was associated with significantly greater goal attainment (OR = 1.02, p = 0.03, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.04). Greater adherence to therapy increased the odds of goal achievement for active indications but not for passive indications, suggesting a possible statistical interaction between the indication for injection and adherence to therapy (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Therapy adherence was associated with greater goal attainment. Active indications for BoNT-A were more reliant on adherence to prescribed therapy programmes than passive indications, although further investigation is required.

Quantitative assessment for flexed-elbow deformity during gait following botulinum toxin A treatment

BACKGROUND

The effect of botulinum toxin A (BoNTA) injection on flexed-elbow deformity is usually evaluated using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), but only with the muscle tone at rest. Some patients show the flexed-elbow deformity during gait despite low muscle tone at rest.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of BoNTA injection on flexed-elbow deformity during gait using a three-dimensional motion analysis system.

METHODS

Twenty stroke patients with spastic flexed-elbow deformity during gait received BoNTA injections into the upper limb muscles. The MAS score of the elbow flexors, passive elbow range of motion, comfortable overground gait velocity, and elbow flexion angle during treadmill gait were evaluated just before and 2, 6, and 12 weeks after the injection. Twenty-five healthy subjects were also recruited to provide a normal reference of the elbow flexion angle.

RESULTS

The MAS scores at 2, 6 and 12 weeks after the injection were significantly lower than that before the injection. Some patients showed no spasticity at rest but an obviously flexed elbow during gait. The elbow flexion angles during gait at 2 and 6 weeks after the injection were significantly lower than that before the injection.

CONCLUSIONS

BoNTA injections to the upper limb muscles reduced muscle tone at rest and flexed-elbow deformity during gait. However, the elbow flexion angle during gait returned to its pre-injection level sooner than the muscle tone at rest. We strongly recommend evaluating muscle tone during motion and at rest, preferably using three-dimensional motion analysis since it can objectively detect small changes.

Analysis of the effects of the upper limb improvement programme in patients after ischemic stroke treated with botulinum toxin

Introduction: Stroke is not only a medical problem, but also - due to the permanent disability of the injured person - a significant social problem. A significant number of patients after a neurological event develop increased muscle tone. Upper motoneuron damage syndrome promotes pain, stiffness, muscle contracture and weakness, which can potentially delay or prevent success in the rehabilitation process. In the upper limb, the spastic pattern is most often expressed through adduction and internal rotation of the glenohumeral joint, combined with flexion in the elbow, radiocarpal joint and interphalangeal joints. The specificity of spasticity-type increased tension makes rehabilitation of patients suffering from this disorder one of the most difficult tasks of neurological rehabilitation. Aim: The aim of the study was to assess muscle tone and range of motion of the inferior limb in patients after ischemic stroke subjected to 4 cycles of intramuscular injections of a botulinum toxin preparation and subjected to motor rehabilitation. Research Project: Pilot experimental study. Methodology: The study was carried out in the Neurological Unit with Stroke Sub-unit and Sub-Department of Neurological Rehabilitation at John Paul II Specialist Hospital in Krakow in the period from September 2014 to November 2015. The study group consisted of 20 patients after ischemic stroke (13 men, 7 women), age 30 to 72. All patients completed a 4-cycle study, which included injections of the botulinum toxin preparation, combined with a 15-day cycle of individual rehabilitation exercises. Each training session lasted 90 minutes. In order to verify the therapeutic process, active and passive mobility was measured according to the SFTR method and the assessment of muscle tone level was done using the Modified Ashworth Scale. Results: The taken therapeutic actions caused a positive increase in mobility, mostly passive, in the glenohumeral-scapular, elbow and forearm as well as the radiocarpal joints. There was also a slight increase in active mobility of the upper limb joints. In the course of obtaining results, it was shown that the use of botulinum toxin, combined with the rehabilitation exercise programme, significantly reduced pathological muscle tone both within the elbow, radiocarpal joint, and the interphalangeal joints of the hands. Conclusions: The presented results showed that the use of the botulinum toxin combined with medical rehabilitation allows local treatment of spasticity without exposing patients to adverse systemic reactions associated with oral medication. In addition, it has a positive effect on the increase in passive and - to a lesser extent - active range of motion in the joints of the inferior limb.

Efficacy and safety of abobotulinumtoxinA in spastic lower limb: Randomized trial and extension

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate single abobotulinumtoxinA injection efficacy in lower limb vs placebo for adults with chronic hemiparesis and assess long-term safety and efficacy of repeated injections.

METHODS

In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-cycle study followed by a 1-year open-label, multiple-cycle extension, adults ≥6 months after stroke/brain injury received one lower limb injection (abobotulinumtoxinA 1,000 U, abobotulinumtoxinA 1,500 U, placebo) followed by ≤4 open-label cycles (1,000, 1,500 U) at ≥12-week intervals. Efficacy measures included Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in gastrocnemius-soleus complex (GSC; double-blind primary endpoint), physician global assessment (PGA), and comfortable barefoot walking speed. Safety was the open-label primary endpoint.

RESULTS

After a single injection, mean (95% confidence interval) MAS GSC changes from baseline at week 4 (double-blind, n = 381) were as follows: -0.5 (-0.7 to -0.4) (placebo, n = 128), -0.6 (-0.8 to -0.5) (abobotulinumtoxinA 1,000 U, n = 125; p = 0.28 vs placebo), and -0.8 (-0.9 to -0.7) (abobotulinumtoxinA 1,500 U, n = 128; p = 0.009 vs placebo). Mean week 4 PGA scores were as follows: 0.7 (0.5, 0.9) (placebo), 0.9 (0.7, 1.1) (1,000 U; p = 0.067 vs placebo), and 0.9 (0.7, 1.1) (1,500 U; p = 0.067); walking speed was not significantly improved vs placebo. At cycle 4, week 4 (open-label), mean MAS GSC change reached -1.0. Incremental improvements in PGA and walking speed occurred across open-label cycles; by cycle 4, week 4, mean PGA was 1.9, and walking speed increased +25.3% (17.5, 33.2), with 16% of participants walking >0.8 m/s (associated with community mobility; 0% at baseline). Tolerability was good and consistent with the known abobotulinumtoxinA safety profile.

CONCLUSIONS

In chronic hemiparesis, single abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport Ipsen) administration reduced muscle tone. Repeated administration over a year was well-tolerated and improved walking speed and likelihood of achieving community ambulation.

CLINICALTRIALGOV IDENTIFIERS

NCT01249404, NCT01251367.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

The double-blind phase of this study provides Class I evidence that for adults with chronic spastic hemiparesis, a single abobotulinumtoxinA injection reduces lower extremity muscle tone.

Dose-Dependent Effects of AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport) on Spasticity and Active Movements in Adults With Upper Limb Spasticity: Secondary Analysis of a Phase 3 Study

BACKGROUND

AbobotulinumtoxinA has beneficial effects on spasticity and active movements in hemiparetic adults with upper limb spasticity (ULS). However, evidence-based information on optimal dosing for clinical use is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To describe joint-specific dose effects of abobotulinumtoxinA in adults with ULS.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of a phase 3 study (NCT01313299).

SETTING

Multicenter, international, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 243 adults with ULS >6 months after stroke or traumatic brain injury, aged 52.8 (13.5) years and 64.3% male, randomized 1:1:1 to receive a single-injection cycle of placebo or abobotulinumtoxinA 500 U or 1000 U (total dose).

METHODS

The overall effects of injected doses were assessed in the primary analysis, which showed improvement of angles of catch in finger, wrist, and elbow flexors and of active range of motion against these muscle groups. This secondary analysis was performed at each of the possible doses received by finger, wrist, and elbow flexors to establish possible dose effects.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Angle of arrest (X_V1) and angle of catch (X_V3) were assessed with the Tardieu Scale, and active range of motion (X_A).

RESULTS

At each muscle group level (finger, wrist, and elbow flexors) improvements in all outcome measures assessed (X_V1, X_V3, X_A) were observed. In each muscle group, increases in abobotulinumtoxinA dose were associated with greater improvements in X_V3 and X_A, suggesting a dose-dependent effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Previous clinical trials have established the clinical efficacy of abobotulinumtoxinA by total dose only. The wide range of abobotulinumtoxinA doses per muscle groups used in this study allowed observation of dose-dependent improvements in spasticity and active movement. This information provides a basis for future abobotulinumtoxinA dosing recommendations for health care professionals based on treatment objectives and quantitative assessment of spasticity and active range of motion at individual joints.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Detection of Botulinum Toxin Muscle Effect in Humans Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Qualitative Case Series

BACKGROUND

Although important for dosing and dilution, there are few data describing botulinum toxin (BT) movement in human muscle.

OBJECTIVE

To better understand BT movement within human muscle.

DESIGN

Proof-of-concept study with descriptive case series.

SETTING

Outpatient academic practice.

PARTICIPANTS

Five subjects with stroke who were BT naive with a mean age of 60.4 ± 14 years and time poststroke of 4.6 ± 3.7 years.

METHODS

Three standardized injections were given to the lateral gastrocnemius muscle (LGM): 2 contained 25 units (U) of onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) in 0.25 mL of saline solution and the third 0.25 mL of saline solution only. The tibialis anterior muscle (TAM) was not injected in any subject. A leg magnetic resonance image was obtained at baseline, 2 months, and 3 months later with a 3.0 Tesla Siemens scanner. Three muscles, the LGM, lateral soleus muscle (LSM), and TAM, were manually outlined on the T2 mapping sequence at each time point. A histogram of T2 relaxation times (T2-RT) for all voxels at baseline was used to calculate a mean and standard deviation (SD) T2-RT for each muscle. Botulinum toxin muscle effect (BTME) at 2 months and 3 months was defined as a subject- and muscle-specific T2-RT voxel threshold ≥3 SD above the baseline mean at or near BT injection sites.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

BTME volume for each leg magnetic resonance imaging slice at 3 time points and 3 muscles for all subjects.

RESULTS

One subject missed the 3-month scan, leaving 18 potential observations of BTME. Little to no BTME effect was seen in the noninjected TAM. A BTME was detected in the LGM in 13 of 18 possible observations, and no effect was detected in 5 observations. Possible BTME effect was seen in the LSM in 3 subjects due to either diffusion through fascia or needle misplacement. Volume of BTME, as defined here, appeared to be substantially greater than the 0.25-mL injection volume.

CONCLUSIONS

This descriptive case series is among the first attempts to quantify BTME within human muscle. Our findings are preliminary and are limited by a few inconsistencies. However, we conclude that use of magnetic resonance imaging to detect the volume of BTME is feasible and may assist researchers in modeling the spread and diffusion of BT within human muscle.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Successive motor nerve blocks to identify the muscles causing a spasticity pattern: example of the arm flexion pattern

Botulinum Toxin A has been the main treatment for spasticity since the beginning of the 1990s. Surprisingly, there is still no consensus regarding injection parameters or, importantly, how to determine which muscles to target to improve specific functions. The aim of this study was to develop a systematic approach to determine this, using the example of the arm flexion pattern. We first determined anatomical landmarks for selective motor block of the brachialis nerve, using 20 forearms from 10 fresh cadavers in Ecole Européenne de Chirurgie and a university-based dissection centre, Paris, France. We then carried out selective blocks of the motor nerves to the brachialis, brachioradialis and biceps brachii in patients with stroke with an arm flexion pattern, in a University Rehabilitation Hospital, Garches, France. We measured: the resting angle of the elbow angle in standing (manual goniometer), active and passive range of extension, and spasticity using the Held and Tardieu and the Modified Ashworth scales. Range of passive elbow extension was also measured with the shoulder in 90° of flexion. The resting angle of the elbow in standing decreased by 35.0° (from 87.6 ± 23.7 to 52.6 ± 24.2°) with inhibition of brachialis, by a further 3.9° (from 52.6 ± 24.2 to 48.7 ± 23.7°) with inhibition of brachioradialis and a further 14.5° (from 48.7 ± 23.7to 34.2 ± 20.7°) with inhibition of biceps brachii. These results were consistent with the clinical evaluation of passive elbow range of motion with the shoulder at 90°. Sequential blocking of the nerves to the three main elbow flexors revealed that the muscle that limited elbow extension the most, was brachialis. This muscle should be the main target to improve the arm flexion pattern. These results show that it is important not simply to inject the most superficial or powerful muscles to treat a spastic deformity. A comprehensive assessment is required. The strategy proposed in this paper should increase the effectiveness of botulinum toxin injections by ensuring that the relevant muscles are targeted.

OnabotulinumtoxinA Injection for Poststroke Upper-Limb Spasticity: Guidance for Early Injectors From a Delphi Panel Process

BACKGROUND

OnabotulinumtoxinA reduces muscle hypertonia associated with poststroke spasticity (PSS). PSS manifests as several common postures.

OBJECTIVE

To define treatment paradigms for PSS upper-limb common postures.

DESIGN

Modified Delphi method.

SETTING

Expert panel.

PARTICIPANTS

Ten injectors experienced in the treatment and clinical research of PSS (physiatrists and neurologists) were invited to participate in the Delphi panel.

METHODS

The Delphi panel reviewed an electronic worksheet with PSS upper-limb postures to define onabotulinumtoxinA treatment paradigms (Round 1). During Round 2, panel members discussed in person Round 1 results and voted until consensus (≥66% agreement). Recommendations were geared toward those with new or early injection experience.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Expert consensus on onabotulinumtoxinA treatment parameters for PSS including muscles to inject, dose per muscle and posture, and treatment adjustments for suboptimal response.

RESULTS

For each posture, consensus was reached on targeted subsets of muscles. Doses ranged for individual muscles (10-100 U) and total doses per posture (50-200 U). An onabotulinumtoxinA dilution 50 U/mL (2:1 dilution ratio) was considered most appropriate; dilution ratios of 1:1 to 4:1 may be appropriate in some circumstances. The majority (89%) of panel members would increase the dose and/or the number of muscles treated for a suboptimal response to onabotulinumtoxinA. The panel identified 3 common aggregate upper-limb postures: (1) adducted shoulder + flexed elbow + pronated forearm + flexed wrist + clenched fist; (2) flexed elbow + pronated forearm + flexed wrist + clenched fist; and (3) flexed wrist + clenched fist. The recommended starting dose per aggregate was 300 U, 300 U, and 200 U, with a total maximum dose of 400 U, 400 U, and 300 U, respectively. Localization guidance techniques were considered essential for all postures.

CONCLUSIONS

Consensus on common muscles and onabotulinumtoxinA treatment paradigms for postures associated with upper-limb PSS was achieved via a modified Delphi method. The purpose of this analysis is to educate early onabotulinumtoxinA injectors rather than provide an evidence-based review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

Spotlight on botulinum toxin and its potential in the treatment of stroke-related spasticity

Poststroke spasticity affects up to one-half of stroke patients and has debilitating effects, contributing to diminished activities of daily living, quality of life, pain, and functional impairments. Botulinum toxin (BoNT) is proven to be safe and effective in the treatment of focal poststroke spasticity. The aim of this review is to highlight BoNT and its potential in the treatment of upper and lower limb poststroke spasticity. We review evidence for the efficacy of BoNT type A and B formulations and address considerations of optimal injection technique, patient and caregiver satisfaction, and potential adverse effects of BoNT.