Insights Into Atrioventricular Nodal Function From Patients Displaying Dual Conduction Properties: Interactive and Orthogonal Pathways

Change in VA interval by a single atrial premature depolarization - What is the mechanism?

A long VA tachycardia during a typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) can be a concomitant atypical AVNRT, atrial tachycardia or rarely atrio-ventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT). There are reported associations of AVNRT with other tachycardia substrates. Maneuvers are useful for differentiating the mechanism of the second tachycardia. Atrial tachycardia (AT) is one common association. When the AT originates from the lower triangle of Koch/near coronary sinus ostium, it can mimic slow-slow/fast-slow AVNRT. We encountered an interesting case where a longer VA tachycardia got reproducibly induced when a critically timed atrial premature depolarisation was delivered on typical AVNRT. It was proved to be an AT. A slow pathway modification in the lower TOK was successful to eliminate both the tachycardia substrate.

Interesting electrophysiological findings in a patient with coexistence of atrial tachycardia originating from coronary sinus and slow-fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

Slow-fast atrioventricular nodal tachycardia (AVNRT) has various electrophysiological aspects due to atrioventricular (AV) nodal physiology. In addition, concomitantly another form of arrhythmia with AVNRT, especially atrial tachycardia (AT), was an infrequent arrhythmia. A 38-year-old female with narrow QRS tachycardia underwent electrophysiological study due to frequent faintness. The electrophysiological study disclosed the coexistence of AT originating from coronary sinus (CS) with slow-fast AVNRT. We easily diagnosed AT originating from CS and terminated with several radiofrequency ablations (RFA) around CS. The diagnosis of slow-fast AVNRT, however, was somewhat difficult due to the following findings: (1) small amount of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) could terminate slow-fast AVNRT reproducibly; (2) we could provoke slow-fast AVNRT only by RV pacing with isoproterenol infusion. With other electrophysiological findings, we diagnosed slow-fast AVNRT. Radiofrequency energy was delivered initially in the posteroseptal region, followed by inside CS, and finally in the middle septal region, which completed the slow pathway ablation. After the procedure, we could never provoke these arrhythmias. <Learning objective: Coexistence of focal AT originating from CS with slow-fast AVNRT is a rare phenomenon. Furthermore, slow-fast AVNRT could show unusual characteristic as following: (1) small amount of ATP terminates slow-fast AVNRT; (2) atrial pacing never provoked slow-fast AVNRT with isoproterenol infusion whereas ventricular pacing did, which depends on the physiological characteristic of the dual AV nodal pathway. Accordingly, we should precisely assess the obtained electrophysiological findings.>.

Coexistence of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with other forms of arrhythmias

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the association of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with other forms of arrhythmia in individual patients and its consequences for treatment.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This study comprised 493 consecutive patients aged 16-88 years (296 women and 197 men) who were diagnosed with a form of AVNRT via a standard 4-catheter electrophysiological study (EPS). Patients were clinically followed (range 0.5-12 years) at a single center.

RESULTS

Coexistence of AVNRT with other types of tachycardias was observed in 197 (40%) patients. Atrial fibrillation was found most frequently in 94 (19%) patients as follows: focal atrial tachycardia, n = 40 (8%); atrial flutter, n = 32 (6%), and AV reentrant tachycardia, n = 22 (4%). Double tachycardia was present in 140 (30%) patients, and more than 2 different types of tachycardias were present in 57 (12%) patients. Transitions between AVNRT and other tachycardias occurred in 25 (5%) patients. Two or more tachycardias were ablated in 42 (9%) patients. The majority of patients were free of symptoms at the first follow-up, whereas 130 (26%) patients reported a variety of symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Coexistence of AVNRT with other types of arrhythmias was a common finding among these patients. The most frequently observed double tachycardia was the combination of AVNRT with atrial tachyarrhythmias, such as atrial fibrillation, with a potential significance for further patient management.