Characterization of Aortic Valve Closure Artifact During Outflow Tract Mapping

‘Vanishing’ fragmented potential at the epicardium in a patient with Brugada syndrome

A man in his 40s with Brugada syndrome underwent catheter ablation for ventricular fibrillation. When we performed epicardial mapping again to check for residual ablation sites after ablation, a remarkable reproducible fragmented potential was observed at the anterior aspect of the right ventricle using an Advisor HD Grid (Abbott), which had not been detected during the initial mapping before ablation, and which was invisible to the ablation catheter. Fluoroscopic imaging demonstrated a shiny area anterior to the heart, suggesting trapped air, presumed to have arisen when the sheath was inserted into the pericardial space. The air trapped between the heart and pericardium prevented the HD grid from contacting the epicardium, resulting in the recording of a fragmented potential. The trapped air was removed manually via the sheath, and the potential vanished. When fragmented potentials are observed at the anterior right ventricle (RV) in the epicardium, air trapping should be ruled out by fluoroscopy.

Mapping and Ablation of Ventricular Outflow Tract Arrhythmias

Arrhythmias arising from the ventricular outflow tracts are commonly encountered. Although largely benign, they can also present with heart failure and sudden cardiac death. Mapping and ablation of these arrhythmias is commonly performed in the electrophysiology laboratory with a high success rate, but occasionally can prove challenging to abolish. This article discusses the mapping and ablation of outflow tract arrhythmias and the challenges that can be overcome by a systematic approach.

Identification of valve-related artifact during cardiac mapping

PURPOSE

During cardiac mapping, it is critical to discriminate signals related to cardiac conduction versus those due to mechanical interaction with other cardiac structures such as valves. We sought to define characteristics that could facilitate discrimination of valve artifact from cardiac conduction signals.

METHODS

Patients with structurally normal heart undergoing mapping for ventricular arrhythmias arising from the vicinity of the aortic valve between January 2013 and May 2015 were included. Potentials felt to reflect aortic valve opening (occurring at the end of the QRS after the local ventricular signal) were termed A1, and those felt to reflect valve closure were termed A2.

RESULTS

A total of 24 patients had mapping in the sinuses of Valsalva, and 10 (average age 40 + 15, 60% male) were found to have additional signals (A1 and/or A2) notable during mapping. In all patients, intervals between A1 and A2 shortened after ectopic beats and lengthened after compensatory pauses. These variations in the interval matched the change in systolic duration on Doppler echocardiography. Overdrive atrial pacing was performed in four patients, which demonstrated progressive shortening of intervals between A1 and A2. Pacing always revealed local capture without affecting A1 or A2. In the one patient in whom ablation was performed in these areas, there was no effect on A1 or A2, suggesting these signals represented artifact.

CONCLUSIONS

Valve-related signals in the aortic sinuses are commonly seen and can be distinguished. The interval between A1 and A2 correlated with mechanical systole and varied in a physiologically predictable manner with heart rate changes.