Guideline-Concordant Antiarrhythmic Drug Use in the Get With The Guidelines-Atrial Fibrillation Registry

Use of class IC antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with structural heart disease and implantable cardioverter defibrillator

BACKGROUND

Due to suspected pro-arrhythmic effects and increased mortality associated with class-IC antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) in previous trials, AAD therapy in structural heart disease (SHD) is mainly restricted to amiodarone. In the presence of diagnostic and therapeutic advancements in cardiovascular medicine, it remains unclear if previous studies adequately reflect contemporary patients. In clinical practice, class-IC-AADs are occasionally used in individual cases, particularly in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD).

METHODS

This study retrospectively investigated outcome in ICD-carriers with SHD in whom class-IC-AADs were used as an individualized therapy due to failure, side effects, or unacceptable risk of alternative therapeutic options.

RESULTS

Fifty patients from four tertiary centers were included (median age 48.5 years; 52% female). The most common underlying SHD were dilated (42%) or ischemic cardiomyopathy (26%) (median LVEF = 45%). Indications for AAD were sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VA) (58%), symptomatic premature ventricular contractions (26%), or atrial arrhythmias (16%). Median follow-up was 27.8 months. Freedom from sustained VA was 72%, and freedom from ICD therapy was 80%. In 19 patients (38%), AAD therapy was terminated. The most common reason was insufficient efficacy (n = 8). Pro-arrhythmia was suspected in three patients. Five patients died during follow-up (10.0%), two of cardiovascular cause (4.0%).

CONCLUSION

In a multicenter cohort of ICD-carriers with SHD, class-IC-AADs were associated with a low rate of pro-arrhythmic effects or cardiovascular mortality. The majority of patients remained free from sustained VA during a follow-up of > 2 years. Further efforts should be made to evaluate the safety of class-IC-AADs in SHD patients receiving contemporary cardiovascular therapy.

[Type 2 amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis: prevalence, time and predictors of development]

BACKGROUND

Amiodarone takes a leading position in arrhythmological practice in the prevention and relief of various cardiac arrhythmias. Type 2 amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis is a frequent side effect of the drug. It is the most complex type of thyroid dysfunction both in terms of the severity of clinical manifestations, and in terms of understanding the mechanisms of pathogenesis, possibility of differential diagnosis and providing effective treatment. Due to the increasing life expectancy of the population, corresponding increase in the frequency of cardiac arrhythmias, the problem does not lose its relevance. Identification of predictors, assessment and prediction of the individual risk of developing this thyroid pathology is a necessity in daily clinical practice for making a reasonable decision when prescribing the drug, determining the algorithm for further dynamic monitoring of the patient.

AIM

To evaluate the structure of amiodarone-induced thyroid dysfunction, prevalence, time and predictors of development type 2 amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis in a prospective cohort study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study involved 124 patients without thyroid dysfunction who received amiodarone therapy for the first time. Evaluation of the functional state of the thyroid gland was performed initially, after prescribing the drug for the first 3 months 1 time per month, in the future - every 3 months. The follow-up period averaged 12-24 months. The end of the observation occurred with the development of amiodaron-induced thyroid dysfunction or patient's refusal to further participate in the study. For the differential diagnosis of the type of amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis, the level of anti-TSH receptor antibodies and thyroid scintigraphy with technetium pertechnetate were determined. The type and frequency of thyroid dysfunction, time and predictors of development type 2 amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis were evaluated.

RESULTS

The structure of amiodarone-induced thyroid dysfunction was represented by hypothyroidism in 19,3% (n=24), type 1 thyrotoxicosis in 1,6% (n=2), type 2 thyrotoxicosis in 23,4% (n=29). The median time of its development was 92,0 [69,0;116,0] weeks; the average period of common survival - 150,2±12,6 weeks (95% CI: 125,5-175,0), median - 144±21,7 weeks (95% CI: 101,4-186,6). The main predictors of type 2 amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis were: age (OR=0,931; 95% CI: 0,895-0,968; p<0.001), BMI (OR=0,859; 95% CI: 0,762-0,967; p=0,012), time from the start of amiodarone therapy (OR=1,023; 95% CI: 1,008-1,038; p=0,003). Age ≤60 years was associated with increased risk of the dysfunction by 2.4 times (OR=2,352; 95% CI: 1,053-5,253; p=0,037), BMI≤26,6 kg/m2 - 2,3 times (OR=2,301; 95% CI: 1,025-5,165; p=0,043). CONCLUSION: The results allow to personalized estimate the risk of type 2 amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis and determine the patient's management tactic.

Drug management of atrial fibrillation in light of guidelines and current evidence: an Italian Survey on behalf of Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing

AIM

Atrial fibrillation is a multifaceted disease requiring personalized treatment, in accordance with current ESC guidelines. Despite a wide range of literature, we still have various aspects dividing the opinion of the experts in rate control, rhythm control and thromboembolic prophylaxis. The aim of this survey was to provide a country-wide picture of current practice regarding atrial fibrillation pharmacological management according to a patient's characteristics.

METHODS

Data were collected using an in-person survey that was administered to members of the Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing.

RESULTS

We collected data from 106 physicians, working in 72 Italian hospitals from 15 of 21 regions. Our work evidenced a high inhomogeneity in atrial fibrillation management regarding rhythm control, rate control and thromboembolic prophylaxis in both acute and chronic patients. This element was more pronounced in settings in which literature shows a lack of evidence and, consequently, the indications provided by the guidelines are weak or absent.

CONCLUSION

This National survey evidenced a high inhomogeneity in current approaches adopted for atrial fibrillation management by a sample of Italian cardiologist experts in arrhythmia management. Further studies are needed to explore if these divergences are associated with different long-term outcomes.

Propafenone use in coronary artery disease patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation

BACKGROUND

Antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) are frequently used after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Class IC AAD use after AF ablation in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is uncertain. The aim was to evaluate propafenone use in CAD patients undergoing AF ablation and to compare propafenone with amiodarone regarding ventricular arrhythmia and mortality.

METHODS

In this retrospective, longitudinal cohort study, consecutive patients with mild to moderate CAD, undergoing AF ablation and receiving either propafenone (study group, n = 263) or amiodarone (control group, n = 499) in the blanking period, were included. After propensity score matching, 212 patients in each group were compared for the primary outcome defined as a composite of ventricular arrhythmic events, which included sudden cardiac death, sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation, or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT). Cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality were evaluated as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Baseline variables of the study and control groups were well matched after propensity score matching. At 12-month follow up, 20 patients (4.7%) (11 in propafenone group and 9 in amiodarone group) experienced the primary outcome measure of NSVT (Gray test p = 0.645). No sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, sudden cardiac death, or cardiovascular mortality were observed. On multivariable competing analysis, age and diabetes but not propafenone use (hazard ratio 1.017; p = 0.804) were found to be independent and significant predictors of the primary outcome measure.

CONCLUSION

Propafenone use after AF ablation in patients with mild to moderate CAD had a safety profile similar to amiodarone and was not associated with major arrhythmic events.

Atrial fibrillation-induced tachycardiomyopathy and heart failure: an underappreciated and elusive condition

Many patients with persistent, chronic, or frequently recurring paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) may develop a tachycardiomyopathy (TCM) with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and heart failure (HF), which is reversible upon restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm, when feasible, or via better and tighter ventricular rate (VR) control. Mechanisms involved in producing this leading cause of TCM (AF-TCM) include loss of atrial contraction, irregular heart rate, fast VR, neurohumoral activation, and structural myocardial changes. The most important of all mechanisms relates to optimal VR control, which seems to be an elusive target. Uncontrolled AF may also worsen preexisting LV dysfunction and exacerbate HF symptoms. Data, albeit less robust, also point to deleterious effects of slow VRs on LV function. Thus, a J-shaped relationship between VR and clinical outcome has been suggested, with the optimal VR control hovering at ~ 65 bpm, ranging between 60 and 80 bpm; VRs above and below this range may confer higher morbidity and mortality rates. A convergence of recent guidelines is noted towards a stricter rather than a more lenient VR control with target heart rate < 80 bpm at rest and < 110 bpm during moderate exercise which seems to prevent TCM or improve LV function and exercise capacity and relieve TCM-related symptoms and signs. Of course, restoring and maintaining sinus rhythm is always a most desirable target, when feasible, either with drugs or more likely with ablation. All these issues are herein reviewed, current guidelines are discussed and relevant data are tabulated and pictorially illustrated.

AIM-AF: A Physician Survey in the United States and Europe

Background

Guideline recommendations are the accepted reference for selection of therapies for rhythm control of atrial fibrillation (AF). This study was designed to understand physicians’ treatment practices and adherence to guidelines.

Methods and Results

The AIM‐AF (Antiarrhythmic Medication for Atrial Fibrillation) study was an online survey of clinical cardiologists and electrophysiologists that was conducted in the United States and Europe (N=629). Respondents actively treated ≥30 patients with AF who received drug therapy, and had received or were referred for ablation every 3 months. The survey comprised 96 questions on physician demographics, AF types, and treatment practices. Overall, 54% of respondents considered guidelines to be the most important nonpatient factor influencing treatment choice. Across most queried comorbidities, amiodarone was selected by 60% to 80% of respondents. Other nonadherent usage included sotalol by 21% in patients with renal impairment; dofetilide initiation (16%, United States only) outside of hospital; class Ic agents by 6% in coronary artery disease; and dronedarone by 8% in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Additionally, rhythm control strategies were frequently chosen in asymptomatic AF (antiarrhythmic drugs [AADs], 35%; ablation, 8%) and subclinical AF (AADs, 38%; ablation, 13%). Despite guideline algorithms emphasizing safety first, efficacy (48%) was selected as the most important consideration for AAD choice, followed by safety (34%).

Conclusions

Despite surveyed clinicians recognizing the importance of guidelines, nonadherence was frequently observed. While deviation may be reasonable in selected patients, in general, nonadherence has the potential to compromise patient safety. These findings highlight an underappreciation of the safe use of AADs, emphasizing the need for interventions to support optimal AAD selection.

Association between economic and arrhythmic burden of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with cardiac implanted electronic devices

BACKGROUND

As the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) increases, a greater understanding of the costs associated with AF care is required. While individuals with greater arrhythmic burden may interact with the health system more frequently, the relationship between AF burden and costs remains undefined.

METHODS

In a longitudinal patient cohort with paroxysmal AF and newly implanted cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) (2010-2016), we linked CIED remote-monitoring data with Medicare claims to assess the association between the 30-day averaged device-detected daily percentage of time in AF ("AF burden") and healthcare costs.

RESULTS

Among 39,345 patients, the mean age was 77.1 ± 8.7 years, 60.7% were male, and the mean CHA₂DS_2-VASc score was 4.9 ± 1.3. The mean total 1-year costs were $18,668 ± 29,173, driven by hospitalization costs where two-thirds of admissions were due to heart failure. Increasing AF burden was associated with increasing costs: $17,860 ± 28,525 for 0% daily AF burden; $18,840 ± 29,104 for 0-5% daily AF burden; and $20,968 ± 31,228 for 5-98% daily AF burden. There was a linear relationship between AF burden expressed as a continuous variable and 1-year costs (adjusted cost rate ratio 1.031 per 10% daily duration in AF, 95% confidence interval 1.023-1.038; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Among older patients with paroxysmal AF and CIEDs, increasing AF burden is associated with higher healthcare costs. As the observational study design is unable to determine causal relationships, prospective study is required to explore the intriguing hypothesis that targeted AF strategies, including comorbidity management, that reduce AF burden may also reduce the high annual costs associated with AF.

Flecainide toxicity with high pacemaker capture thresholds and associated takotsubo syndrome

We describe a case of a woman in her 80s with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) despite being on flecainide who was admitted for AF with rapid ventricular response. Attempts with direct-current cardioversions were unsuccessful despite increased doses of the antiarrhythmic therapy. At atrioventricular (AV) nodal ablation, very high right ventricular capture thresholds resulted in abortion of the procedure as back-up ventricular pacing could not be assured with adequate margin for safety. Shortly following the electrophysiology (EP) study, the patient developed cardiogenic shock with new apical left ventricular regional wall motion abnormality suggestive of apical ballooning and a toxic-appearing wide QRS complex electrocardiogram (EKG). The patient was successfully treated with sodium bicarbonate infusion for presumed flecainide toxicity. The regional wall motion abnormality and EKG changes resolved along with normalisation of capture thresholds after 2 days of treatment. The patient underwent an uncomplicated successful AV nodal ablation several weeks later.