Genotype-Phenotype Correlation of SCN5A Genotype in Patients With Brugada Syndrome and Arrhythmic Events: Insights From the SABRUS in 392 Probands

More than 30 years of Brugada syndrome: a critical appraisal of achievements and open issues

Over the last three decades, what is referred to as Brugada syndrome (BrS) has developed from a clinical observation of initially a few cases of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in the absence of structural heart disease with ECG signs of "atypical right bundle brunch block" to a predominantly electrocardiographic, and to a lesser extent genetic, diagnosis. Today, BrS is diagnosed in patients without overt structural heart disease and a spontaneous Brugada type 1 ECG pattern regardless of symptoms. The diagnosis of BrS is less clear in those with an only transient or drug-induced type 1 Brugada pattern, but should be considered in the presence of an arrhythmic syncope, family history of BrS, or family history of sudden death. In addition to survived cardiac arrest, syncope is probably the single most decisive risk marker for future arrhythmias. For asymptomatic BrS, risk stratification remains challenging. General recommendations to lower the risk in BrS include avoidance of drugs/agents known to induce and/or increase right precordial ST-segment elevation, including treatment of fever with antipyretic drugs. Several ECG markers that have been associated with an increased risk of SCD have been incorporated into a recently published risk score for BrS. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the status of risk stratification and to illustrate open issues und gaps in evidence in BrS.

Ethnic and racial differences in Asian populations with ion channelopathies associated with sudden cardiac death

Cardiovascular diseases are associated with several morbidities and are the most common cause of worldwide disease-related fatalities. Studies show that treatment and outcome-related differences for cardiovascular diseases disproportionately affect minorities in the United States. The emergence of ethnic and racial differences in sudden cardiac death (SCD) and related ion channelopathies complicates cardiovascular disease prevention, diagnosis, management, prognosis, and treatment objectives for patients and physicians alike. This review compiles and synthesizes current research in cardiac ion channelopathies and genetic disorders in Asian populations, an underrepresented population in cardiovascular literature. We first present a brief introduction to SCD, noting relevant observations and statistics from around the world, including Asian populations. We then examined existing differences between Asian and White populations in research, treatment, and outcomes related to cardiac ion channelopathies and SCD, showing progression in thought and research over time for each ion channelopathy. The review also identifies research that explored phenotypic abnormalities, device usage, and risk of death in Asian patients. We touch upon the unique genetic risk factors in Asian populations that lead to cardiac ion channelopathies and SCD while comparing them to White and Western populations, particularly in the United States, where Asians comprise approximately 7% of the total population. We also propose potential solutions such as improving early genetic screening, addressing barriers affecting access to medical care and device utilization, physician training, and patient education on risks.

Global disparities in arrhythmia care: Mind the gap

Delivery of comprehensive arrhythmia care requires the simultaneous presence of many resources. These include complex hospital infrastructure, expensive implantable equipment, and expert personnel. In many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), at least 1 of these components is often missing, resulting in a gap between the demand for arrhythmia care and the capacity to supply care. In addition to this treatment gap, there exists a training gap, as many clinicians in LMICs have limited access to formal training in cardiac electrophysiology. Given the progressive increase in the burden of cardiovascular diseases in LMICs, these patient care and clinical training gaps will widen unless further actions are taken to build capacity. Several strategies for building arrhythmia care capacity in LMICs have been described. Medical missions can provide donations of both equipment and clinical expertise but are only intermittently present and therefore are not optimized to provide the longitudinal support needed to create self-sustaining infrastructure. Use of donated or reprocessed equipment (eg, cardiac implantable electronic devices) can reduce procedural costs but does not address the need for infrastructure, including diagnostics and expert personnel. Collaborative efforts involving multiple stakeholders (eg, professional organizations, government agencies, hospitals, and educational institutions) have the potential to provide longitudinal support of both patient care and clinician education in LMICs.

Structural Heart Alterations in Brugada Syndrome: Is it Really a Channelopathy? A Systematic Review

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is classified as an inherited cardiac channelopathy attributed to dysfunctional ion channels and/or associated proteins in cardiomyocytes rather than to structural heart alterations. However, hearts of some BrS patients exhibit slight histologic abnormalities, suggesting that BrS could be a phenotypic variant of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. We performed a systematic review of the literature following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement (PRISMA) criteria. Our comprehensive analysis of structural findings did not reveal enough definitive evidence for reclassification of BrS as a cardiomyopathy. The collection and comprehensive analysis of new cases with a definitive BrS diagnosis are needed to clarify whether some of these structural features may have key roles in the pathophysiological pathways associated with malignant arrhythmogenic episodes.

The Genetics of Brugada Syndrome

Brugada syndrome is a heritable channelopathy characterized by a peculiar electrocardiogram (ECG) pattern and increased risk of cardiac arrhythmias and sudden death. The arrhythmias originate because of an imbalance between the repolarizing and depolarizing currents that modulate the cardiac action potential. Even if an overt structural cardiomyopathy is not typical of Brugada syndrome, fibrosis and structural changes in the right ventricle contribute to a conduction slowing, which ultimately facilitates ventricular arrhythmias. Currently, Mendelian autosomal dominant transmission is detected in less than 25% of all clinical confirmed cases. Although 23 genes have been associated with the condition, only SCN5A, encoding the cardiac sodium channel, is considered clinically actionable and disease causing. The limited monogenic inheritance has pointed toward new perspectives on the possible complex genetic architecture of the disease, involving polygenic inheritance and a polygenic risk score that can influence penetrance and risk stratification. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, Volume 23 is October 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.