Impact of Ejection Fraction on the Clinical Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Mild Heart Failure

Clinical Outcomes of Permanent Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction >35 vs. ≤35%

Aims

The present study aimed to compare the effects of left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) on cardiac function and clinical outcomes in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >35 vs. ≤35%.

Methods and Results

Thirty-six consecutive patients with LBBB and LVEF <50% were enrolled. All patients were followed up for a mean of 6 months. The successful LBBAP was defined as a paced QRS complex presented as right bundle branch block (RBBB) morphology and QRSd < 130 ms. Echocardiography parameters, pacing parameters and clinical outcomes were collected. The successful LBBAP was achieved in 77.8% of all cases (28/36). In LVEF > 35% group (70 ± 8 years, 9 male), the success rate was 81.0% (17/21). QRSd significantly decreased from 174 ± 23 ms to 108 ± 13 ms (P < 0.001). The pacing threshold and R-wave amplitude were 0.6 ± 0.2 V @ 0.5 ms and 12 ± 7 mV, respectively. In LVEF ≤ 35% group (69 ± 5 years, 9 male), the success rate was 73.3% (11/15) with QRSd decreasing from 188 ± 25 ms to 107 ± 11 ms (P < 0.001). The hyperresponders to LBBAP (functional recovery and LVEF ≥ 50%) in LVEF > 35% group was 52.9%, which were almost twice of that in LVEF ≤ 35% group (33.3%). Whether patients had LBBAP or left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP), patients in the LVEF > 35% group showed significantly lower incidence of heart failure hospitalizations or death from any cause (hazard ratio in LVEF > 35% group, 0.22; 95%CI, 0.06 to 0.75, P = 0.011).

Conclusions

LBBAP can significantly shorten the QRSd and improve cardiac function in LBBB patients with either LVEF > 35 or ≤ 35%. LBBAP should be considered as an effective therapy for preventing the deterioration of cardiac function in early-stage heart failure patients with LBBB and LVEF > 35%.

Recapitulation of dyssynchrony-associated contractile impairment in asymmetrically paced engineered heart tissue

BACKGROUND

One third of heart failure patients exhibit dyssynchronized electromechanical activity of the heart (evidenced by a broad QRS-complex). Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in the form of biventricular pacing improves cardiac output and clinical outcome of responding patients. Technically demanding and laborious large animal models have been developed to better predict responders of CRT and to investigate molecular mechanisms of dyssynchrony and CRT. The aim of this study was to establish a first humanized in vitro model of dyssynchrony and CRT.

METHODS

Cardiomyocytes were differentiated from human induced pluripotent stem cells and cast into a fibrin matrix to produce engineered heart tissue (EHT). EHTs were either field stimulated in their entirety (symmetrically) or excited locally from one end (asymmetrically) or they were allowed to beat spontaneously.

RESULTS

Asymmetrical pacing led to a depolarization wave from one end to the other end, which was visualized in human EHT transduced with a fast genetic Ca²⁺-sensor (GCaMP6f) arguing for dyssynchronous excitation. Symmetrical pacing in contrast led to an instantaneous (synchronized) Ca²⁺-signal throughout the EHT. To investigate acute and long-term functional effects, spontaneously beating human EHTs (0.5-0.8 Hz) were divided into a non-paced control group, a symmetrically and an asymmetrically paced group, each stimulated at 1 Hz. Symmetrical pacing was clearly superior to asymmetrical pacing or no pacing regarding contractile force both acutely and even more pronounced after weeks of continuous stimulation. Contractile dysfunction that can be evoked by an increased afterload was aggravated in the asymmetrically paced group. Consistent with reports from paced dogs, p38MAPK and CaMKII-abundance was higher under asymmetrical than under symmetrical pacing while pAKT was considerably lower.

CONCLUSIONS

This model allows for long-term pacing experiments mimicking electrical dyssynchrony vs. synchrony in vitro. Combined with force measurement and afterload stimulus manipulation, it provides a robust new tool to gain insight into the biology of dyssynchrony and CRT.

Optimized implementation of cardiac resynchronization therapy: a call for action for referral and optimization of care

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is one of the most effective therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and leads to improved quality of life, reductions in heart failure hospitalization rates and all-cause mortality. Nevertheless, up to two-thirds of eligible patients are not referred for CRT. Furthermore, post-implantation follow-up is often fragmented and suboptimal, hampering the potential maximal treatment effect. This joint position statement from three European Society of Cardiology Associations, Heart Failure Association (HFA), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI), focuses on optimized implementation of CRT. We offer theoretical and practical strategies to achieve more comprehensive CRT referral and post-procedural care by focusing on four actionable domains: (i) overcoming CRT under-utilization, (ii) better understanding of pre-implant characteristics, (iii) abandoning the term 'non-response' and replacing this by the concept of disease modification, and (iv) implementing a dedicated post-implant CRT care pathway.

Optimized implementation of cardiac resynchronization therapy: a call for action for referral and optimization of care: A joint position statement from the Heart Failure Association (HFA), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) of the European Society of Cardiology

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is one of the most effective therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and leads to improved quality of life, reductions in heart failure hospitalization rates and all-cause mortality. Nevertheless, up to two-thirds of eligible patients are not referred for CRT. Furthermore, post-implantation follow-up is often fragmented and suboptimal, hampering the potential maximal treatment effect. This joint position statement from three European Society of Cardiology Associations, Heart Failure Association (HFA), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI), focuses on optimized implementation of CRT. We offer theoretical and practical strategies to achieve more comprehensive CRT referral and post-procedural care by focusing on four actionable domains: (i) overcoming CRT under-utilization, (ii) better understanding of pre-implant characteristics, (iii) abandoning the term 'non-response' and replacing this by the concept of disease modification, and (iv) implementing a dedicated post-implant CRT care pathway.

Six months clinical outcome comparison between quadripolar and bipolar left ventricular leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy: A prospective, non-randomized, single-centre observational study

Background and objectives

Quadripolar left ventricular (LV) leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) offer multi-vector pacing with different pacing configurations and hence enabling LV pacing at most suitable site with better lead stability. We aim to compare the outcomes between quadripolar and bipolar LV lead in patients receiving CRT.

Methods

In this prospective, non-randomized, single-center observational study, we enrolled 93 patients receiving CRT with bipolar (BiP) (n = 31) and quadripolar (Quad) (n = 62) LV lead between August 2016 to August 2019. Patients were followed for six months, and outcomes were compared with respect to CRT response (defined as ≥5% absolute increase in left ventricle ejection fraction), electrocardiographic, echocardiographic parameters, NYHA functional class improvement, and incidence of LV lead-related complication.

Results

At the end of six months follow up, CRT with quadripolar lead was associated with better response rate as compared to bipolar pacing (85.48% vs 64.51%; p = 0.03), lesser heart failure (HF) hospitalization events (1.5 vs 2; p = 0.04) and better improvement in HF symptoms (patients with ≥1 NYHA improvement 87.09% vs 67.74%; p = 0.04). There were fewer deaths per 100 patient-year (6.45 vs 9.37; p = 0.04) and more narrowing of QRS duration (Δ12.56 ± 3.11 ms vs Δ7.29 ± 1.87 ms; p = 0.04) with quadripolar lead use. Lead related complications were significantly more with the use of bipolar lead (74.19% vs 41.94%; p = 0.02).

Conclusions

Our prospective, non-randomized, single-center observational study reveals that patients receiving CRT with quadripolar leads have a better response to therapy, lesser heart failure hospitalizations, lower all-cause mortality, and fewer lead-related complications, proving its superiority over the bipolar lead.

QRS duration is a risk indicator of adverse outcomes after MitraClip

BACKGROUND

While QRS duration is a known marker of left ventricular (LV) function, little is known about its utility for predicting clinical prognosis after transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR). We investigated the association between QRS duration and one-year adverse events after TMVR with the MitraClip system.

METHODS

From January 2011 through April 2019, we identified consecutive patients who underwent TMVR. Patients who had prior cardiac resynchronization therapy or a ventricular pacing rhythm were excluded. The patients were divided into two groups according to their QRS duration (<120 or ≥ 120 ms). Cox proportional hazard model was applied to determine the association between QRS duration and the composite outcome (all-cause mortality and re-hospitalization due to heart failure) within 1 year.

RESULTS

A total of 348 patients were analyzed. Prolonged QRS duration (≥120 ms) was associated with an increased risk of the composite outcome (adjusted-HR 2.35, 95%CI 1.30-4.24, p = .005). There was a linear relationship between prolonged QRS duration and the increased risk of the composite outcomes. The observed association was consistent both in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% and those with >35%. Furthermore, a QRS duration ≥120 ms was associated with lower improvement of LVEF at follow-up (adjusted-β coefficient - 5.31%, 95%CI -8.17 to -2.46, p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged QRS duration was associated with an increased risk of mortality and re-hospitalization and less improvement of LVEF following TMVR. QRS duration could be a useful marker to predict adverse outcomes and LV function after TMVR.

Prognostic effects of longitudinal changes in left ventricular ejection fraction with cardiac resynchronization therapy

Aims

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is considered an indicator of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Longitudinal studies on the predictive value of LVEF are scarce. We aimed to comprehensively evaluate the prognostic role of LVEF in the outcomes of Chinese patients with CRT.

Methods and results

Three hundred ninety‐two patients were divided into three tertiles of LVEF: ≤25%, 25–30%, and 30–35%, and four groups by LVEF changes: <0% (negative response); ≥0% and ≤5% (non‐response); >5% and ≤15% (response); and >15% (super‐response). One hundred six patients were super‐responders. During a median follow‐up of 3.6 years, 141 reached the composite endpoint. Odds ratios (ORs) for super‐response depicted a reversed U‐shaped relationship for baseline LVEF with a peak at 25–30%. Independent predictors of super‐response were smaller left atrial diameter [odds ratio 0.897, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.844–0.955, P = 0.001], smaller left ventricular end‐diastolic diameter (OR 0.937, 95% CI 0.889–0.989, P = 0.018), and higher estimated glomerular filtration rate (OR 1.018, 95% CI 1.001–1.035, P = 0.042) in Tertile 1; atrial fibrillation (OR 0.278, 95% CI 0.086–0.901, P = 0.033), left bundle branch block (OR 4.096, 95% CI 1.046–16.037, P = 0.043), and left ventricular end‐diastolic diameter (OR 0.929, 95% CI 0.876–0.986, P = 0.016) in Tertile 2; while female sex (OR 2.778, 95% CI 1.082–7.132, P = 0.034) and higher systolic blood pressure (OR 1.045, 95% CI 1.013–1.079, P = 0.006) in Tertile 3. An inverse association with the composite endpoint was found in Tertile 1 vs. Tertile 2 (hazard ratio 1.934, 95% CI 1.248–2.996, P = 0.003). The prognostic effects of CRT response in Tertile 3 and Tertile 1 varied significantly (P for trend = 0.017 and <0.001). Among three tertiles in super‐responders, event‐free survival was similar (P for trend = 0.143).

Conclusions

Left ventricular ejection fraction of 25–30% is associated with a better prognosis of super‐response. Predictors of super‐response are different for LVEF tertiles. CRT responses would have better prognostic performance than LVEF tertiles at baseline, which should be considered when clinicians screening eligible patients for CRT.

Long-Term Effects of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitors on Myocardial Function in Chronic Heart Failure Patients with Reduced Ejection Fraction

BACKGROUND

We sought to evaluate the long-term effects of angiotensin receptor blocker-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) therapy on reverse remodeling of the failing myocardium in HFrEF patients.

METHODS

We performed a prospective non-randomized longitudinal study on 228 HFrEF patients treated with ARNI at our center. Prior to ARNI introduction all patients received stable doses of ACEI/ARB for at least six months. Clinical, biochemical and echocardiography data were obtained at ARNI introduction and 12-month follow-up. Results At follow-up, we found significant improvements in LVEF (29.7% ± 8% vs. 36.5% ± 9%; p < 0.001), LVOT-VTI (14.8 ± 4.2 cm vs. 17.2 ± 4.2 cm; p < 0.001), TAPSE (1.7 ± 0.5 cm vs. 2.1 ± 0.6 cm; p < 0.001) and LV-EDD (6.5 ± 0.8 cm vs. 6.3 ± 0.9 cm; p = 0.001). NT-proBNP serum levels also decreased significantly (1324 (605, 3281) pg/mL vs. 792 (329, 2022) pg/mL; p = 0.001). A total of 102 (45%) of patients responded favorably to ARNI (ΔLVEF < +5%; Group A) and 126 (55%) patients achieved ΔLVEF ≥ +5% (Group B). The two groups differed significantly in age, heart failure etiology, baseline LVEF and baseline NT-proBNP. On multivariable analysis, nonischemic heart failure, LVEF < 30% and NT-proBNP < 1500 pg/mL emerged as independent correlates of favorable response to ARNI therapy.

CONCLUSION

ARNI therapy appears to improve echocardiographic parameters of left and right ventricular function in HFrEF patients above the effect of pre-existing optimal medical management. These effects may be particularly pronounced in patients with nonischemic heart failure, LVEF < 30% and lower degree of neurohumoral activation.

Sleep-disordered breathing and effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients: gender differences?

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated heart failure (HF) patients who underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and who had device-documented sleep-disordered breathing (SDB). We found gender differences in acute changes in SDB due to CRT impact.

BACKGROUND

SDB typically occurs in HF patients. However, the role of SDB and its response to CRT in HF patients, as well as the relation with gender are currently not fully researched.

METHODS

Among 63 consecutive patients who received CRT with an SDB algorithm, 23 patients documented SDB at one-month cardiac device interrogation and represented our population. We defined a Sleep apnoea Severity SCore(SSSC), and consequently, patients were categorized to have mild, moderate, and severe sleep apnoea syndrome divided into two groups: Group-1: 18 males (78%); Group-2: 5 females (22%). We evaluated the variation of apnoea burden and CRT response based on gender differences.

RESULTS

A significantly higher proportion of patients in the male group were non-responders to CRT at 12-months follow-up (p = 0.076) while in the female population 5/5 patients (100%) were responders to CRT at the same follow-up time (p = 0.021). Among Group-2 subjects, we documented a significant linear decrease in SSSC(p > 0,01) while in Group-1 the CRT effect on SSSC was variable. At 12-months follow-up, the difference in SSSC between the two groups was statistically significant (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study reports a correlation between CRT response and sleep apnoea burden considering gender differences. In particular, HF-women responders to CRT demonstrate a significant linear decrease in sleep apnoea burden determined through a device algorithm, when compared to a similar male population. Further research is needed to confirm these findings.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and moderately reduced ejection fraction: Could it trigger a super-response?

Background/Aim

Despite the well-established benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure (HF) patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, many patients with less reduced EF remain refractory to optimized medical treatment and at high risk of morbidity and mortality. The objective of the study is to evaluate the effects of CRT in optimally treated patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes II–IV, LVEF of 36–45%, and left bundle branch (LBBB), including clinical, structural and biochemical response.

Methods

A selected group of HF patients have been implanted with CRT-P devices and were followed up for 6 months at 4, 12 and 24 weeks. Clinical assessment included NYHA class, quality of life and 6-min walk distance (6 MWD) test. Echocardiographic assessment included LV dimensions and function and left atrial volume. Serum N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-ProBNP) was measured at the same intervals.

Results

This prospective single center study included 23 patients. NYHA functional class significantly improved after CRT-P (p < 0.0001), associated with improvement in QOL (p < 0.0001) and 6 MWD, which increased, from 145.7 ± 20.1 m to 219.5 ± 42.2 m (p < 0.0001). Mean QRS duration showed significant shortening from 164.4 ± 13.2 ms to 126.4 ± 13.6 ms (p < 0.0001). CRT induced reverse remodeling with reduction in both left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD) from 68.95 ± 5.05 mm to 62.8 ± 4.47 mm, p = 0.0002 and left ventricular end systolic diameter (LVESD) from 54.1 ± 4.5 mm to 46.5 ± 4.1 mm, p < 0.0001, and significant increase in LVEF (from 40.3 ± 2.8 to 48.3 ± 4.2 mm, p < 0.0001). The biochemical response to CRT showed significant reduction in serum NT-ProBNP from 1025.6 ± 363.1 pg/ml to 594.9 ± 263.5 pg/ml (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Symptomatic HF patients on maximal optimized medical treatment who have LBBB and baseline LVEF 35–45% appeared to derive significant clinical and structural benefit from CRT.

Saudi Heart Association (SHA) guidelines for the management of heart failure

Heart failure (HF) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and negatively impacts quality of life, healthcare costs, and longevity. Although data on HF in the Arab population are scarce, recently developed regional registries are a step forward to evaluating the quality of current patient care and providing an overview of the clinical picture. Despite the burden of HF in Saudi Arabia, there are currently no standardized protocols or guidelines for the management of patients with acute or chronic heart failure. Therefore, the Heart Failure Expert Committee, comprising 13 local specialists representing both public and private sectors, has developed guidelines to address the needs and challenges for the diagnosis and treatment of HF in Saudi Arabia. The ultimate aim of these guidelines is to assist healthcare professionals in delivering optimal care and standardized clinical practice across Saudi Arabia.

2D/3D Echocardiographic features of patients with reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy

PURPOSE

To describe clinical and echocardiographic characteristics associated with reverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling after 6 months of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.

METHODS

Twenty-four consecutive patients underwent 2D and 3D echocardiography before and after 6 months of CRT implant. Several echocardiographic parameters including global longitudinal strain (GLS) and 3D mechanical dyssynchrony (MD) index were calculated. CRT response was defined as a decrease in LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) of at least 10% at follow-up. Patients were divided in two groups according to CRT response.

RESULTS

Cardiac resynchronization therapy responder (CRTR+) rate was 50%. Nonresponder (CRTR-) patients showed a less significant improvement in NYHA class at follow-up. At baseline, CRTR- presented with higher LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) (P = 0.031), LVESV (P = 0.024), lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (P = 0.002) and less negative GLS (P = 0.03), and with higher diastolic dysfunction, more impaired right ventricle (RV), and higher pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) (P = 0.002). No significant differences in echocardiographic parameters of MD were found. Univariate determinants of CRTR+ were LVEF (OR = 1.59, CI 95% = 1.13-2.22, P = 0.007) and TAPSE (OR 1.21, CI 95% = 1.024-1.429, P = 0.025). A ROC curve analysis showed a cutoff value of LVEF of 22.15% significantly related to CRTR+ (SE 80%, SP 50%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that end-stage HF patients, presenting before CRT with LVEF <22.15%, may not benefit from the procedure after 6 months. Mechanical dyssyncronicity did not provide additional information to improve candidate selection.

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Preserved to Mildly Reduced Systolic Function

Cardiac resynchronization therapy has been proven to be clearly beneficial for patients with heart failure, a prolonged QRS duration, and a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%. Ejection fraction cutoff, however, is arbitrary and very likely excludes many patients who could benefit from cardiac resynchronization. This article describes the major detrimental effects of left bundle branch block and summarizes the data regarding the potential beneficial effects of cardiac resynchronization in patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 35%.

Clinical outcomes according to QRS duration and morphology in the irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved systolic function (I-PRESERVE) trial

BACKGROUND

The aims of this study were to describe the prevalence of QRS prolongation and abnormal QRS morphology in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HF-PEF) and to examine the relationship between these QRS abnormalities and clinical outcomes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We categorized patients in the Irbesartan in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction trial (I-PRESERVE) according to QRS duration <120 vs. ≥120 ms and QRS morphology: normal, left bundle branch block (LBBB), and right bundle branch block (RBBB) or other non-specific intra-ventricular conduction defect (IVCD). The outcomes examined were the composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization (and its components) and all-cause mortality. Of the 4128 patients enrolled in I-PRESERVE, 3754 were included in the present analyses. A total of 606 patients had a QRS duration ≥120 ms, 302 had LBBB and 742 had RBBB/IVCD. Patients with an abnormal QRS had evidence of more severe heart failure [lower left ventricular ejection fraction, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)] and worse clinical status (higher New York Heart Association functional class and greater use of diuretics). Both abnormalities of QRS duration and QRS morphology were associated with worse outcomes. The rates of the composite outcome were: 6.0 and 9.3 per 100 patient years in the <120 ms and ≥120 ms groups, respectively [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-1.57; P = 0.002) and 6.0, 7.7 and 8.7 per 100 patient years in the normal, non-LBBB and LBBB groups, respectively (adjusted HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.00-1.42, P = 0.046; and HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.03-1.66, P = 0.026, respectively, compared with normal). The heightened risk related to QRS abnormalities persisted after adjustment for other prognostic variables, including NT-proBNP.

CONCLUSION

We found that both prolongation of QRS duration and abnormal QRS morphology were associated with a high risk of fatal and non-fatal adverse outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy in chronic heart failure with moderately reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: Lessons from the Multicenter InSync Randomized Clinical Evaluation MIRACLE EF study

BACKGROUND

The benefits of CRT for symptomatic heart failure (HF) patients with a wide QRS and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF≤35%), are well established .Post-hoc subgroup analyses suggest that CRT benefit may extend to patients with LVEF>35%.

METHODS

The MIRACLE EF was a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blinded study to evaluate CRT-P in NYHA II-III HF patients with LBBB and with LVEF of 36%-50% and no previous pacing or ICD. The primary endpoint was a composite of time to first HF event or death. All patients were implanted with a CRT-P and randomized 2:1 to CRT-P ON or CRT-P OFF groups. The minimum follow up time was 24 months.

RESULTS

The MIRACLE EF study was stopped for enrollment futility after 13 months and enrolling only 44 patients. The main difficulties in recruiting patients were lack of eligible patients, previous ICD implants, and the reluctance of institutions, patients or physicians to enroll in the study which included a potential 5 year CRT OFF period.

CONCLUSION

Despite a careful design, identification and randomization of eligible patients were challenging and a trial to assess morbidity and mortality trial was not feasible. The MIRACLE EF experience illustrates the difficulties of designing a scientifically robust but feasible study to assess potential new indications for implantable devices. Smaller randomized studies with surrogate endpoints may therefore be more reasonable, although the potential impact of such studies on clinical practice, guidelines, and reimbursement remain to be determined.

Echocardiographic Predictors of Worse Outcome After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is the recommended treatment by leading global guidelines. However, 30%-40% of selected patients are non-responders.

OBJECTIVE

To develop an echocardiographic model to predict cardiac death or transplantation (Tx) 1 year after CRT.

METHOD

Observational, prospective study, with the inclusion of 116 patients, aged 64.89 ± 11.18 years, 69.8% male, 68,1% in NYHA FC III and 31,9% in FC IV, 71.55% with left bundle-branch block, and median ejection fraction (EF) of 29%. Evaluations were made in the pre‑implantation period and 6-12 months after that, and correlated with cardiac mortality/Tx at the end of follow-up. Cox and logistic regression analyses were performed with ROC and Kaplan-Meier curves. The model was internally validated by bootstrapping.

RESULTS

There were 29 (25%) deaths/Tx during follow-up of 34.09 ± 17.9 months. Cardiac mortality/Tx was 16.3%. In the multivariate Cox model, EF < 30%, grade III/IV diastolic dysfunction and grade III mitral regurgitation at 6‑12 months were independently related to increased cardiac mortality or Tx, with hazard ratios of 3.1, 4.63 and 7.11, respectively. The area under the ROC curve was 0.78.

CONCLUSION

EF lower than 30%, severe diastolic dysfunction and severe mitral regurgitation indicate poor prognosis 1 year after CRT. The combination of two of those variables indicate the need for other treatment options.

Development and Validation of Predictive Models of Cardiac Mortality and Transplantation in Resynchronization Therapy

Background

30-40% of cardiac resynchronization therapy cases do not achieve favorable outcomes.

Objective

This study aimed to develop predictive models for the combined endpoint of cardiac death and transplantation (Tx) at different stages of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

Methods

Prospective observational study of 116 patients aged 64.8 ± 11.1 years, 68.1% of whom had functional class (FC) III and 31.9% had ambulatory class IV. Clinical, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic variables were assessed by using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier curves.

Results

The cardiac mortality/Tx rate was 16.3% during the follow-up period of 34.0 ± 17.9 months. Prior to implantation, right ventricular dysfunction (RVD), ejection fraction < 25% and use of high doses of diuretics (HDD) increased the risk of cardiac death and Tx by 3.9-, 4.8-, and 5.9-fold, respectively. In the first year after CRT, RVD, HDD and hospitalization due to congestive heart failure increased the risk of death at hazard ratios of 3.5, 5.3, and 12.5, respectively. In the second year after CRT, RVD and FC III/IV were significant risk factors of mortality in the multivariate Cox model. The accuracy rates of the models were 84.6% at preimplantation, 93% in the first year after CRT, and 90.5% in the second year after CRT. The models were validated by bootstrapping.

Conclusion

We developed predictive models of cardiac death and Tx at different stages of CRT based on the analysis of simple and easily obtainable clinical and echocardiographic variables. The models showed good accuracy and adjustment, were validated internally, and are useful in the selection, monitoring and counseling of patients indicated for CRT.

Defining the real-world reproducibility of visual grading of left ventricular function and visual estimation of left ventricular ejection fraction: impact of image quality, experience and accreditation

Left ventricular function can be evaluated by qualitative grading and by eyeball estimation of ejection fraction (EF). We sought to define the reproducibility of these techniques, and how they are affected by image quality, experience and accreditation. Twenty apical four-chamber echocardiographic cine loops (Online Resource 1–20) of varying image quality and left ventricular function were anonymized and presented to 35 operators. Operators were asked to provide (1) a one-phrase grading of global systolic function (2) an “eyeball” EF estimate and (3) an image quality rating on a 0–100 visual analogue scale. Each observer viewed every loop twice unknowingly, a total of 1400 viewings. When grading LV function into five categories, an operator’s chance of agreement with another operator was 50 % and with themself on blinded re-presentation was 68 %. Blinded eyeball LVEF re-estimates by the same operator had standard deviation (SD) of difference of 7.6 EF units, with the SD across operators averaging 8.3 EF units. Image quality, defined as the average of all operators’ assessments, correlated with EF estimate variability (r = −0.616, p < 0.01) and visual grading agreement (r = 0.58, p < 0.01). However, operators’ own single quality assessments were not a useful forewarning of their estimate being an outlier, partly because individual quality assessments had poor within-operator reproducibility (SD of difference 17.8). Reproducibility of visual grading of LV function and LVEF estimation is dependent on image quality, but individuals cannot themselves identify when poor image quality is disrupting their LV function estimate. Clinicians should not assume that patients changing in grade or in visually estimated EF have had a genuine clinical change.

Update in cardiac arrhythmias and pacing

This article discusses the main advances in cardiac arrhythmias and pacing published between 2013 and 2014. Special attention is given to the interventional treatment of atrial fibrillation and ventricular arrhythmias, and on advances in cardiac pacing and implantable cardioverter defibrillators, with particular reference to the elderly patient.

Left ventricular ejection fraction normalization in cardiac resynchronization therapy and risk of ventricular arrhythmias and clinical outcomes: results from the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT) trial

BACKGROUND

Appropriate guideline criteria for use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) do not take into account potential recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients treated with CRT-defibrillator.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients randomized to CRT-defibrillator from the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT) trial who survived and had paired echocardiograms at enrollment and at 12 months (n=752) were included. Patients were evaluated by LVEF recovery in 3 groups (LVEF ≤35% [reference], 36%-50%, and >50%) on outcomes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTAs), VTA ≥200 bpm, ICD shock, heart failure or death, and inappropriate ICD therapy by multivariable Cox models. A total of 7.3% achieved LVEF normalization (>50%). The average follow-up was 2.2±0.8 years. The risk of VTA was reduced in patients with LVEF >50% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07-0.82; P=0.023) and LVEF of 36% to 50% (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.28-0.68; P<0.001). Among patients with LVEF >50%, only 1 patient had VTA ≥200 bpm (HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.02-1.51), none were shocked by the ICD, and 2 died of nonarrhythmic causes. The risk of HF or death was reduced with improvements in LVEF (LVEF >50%: HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09-0.97; P=0.045; and LVEF of 36%-50%: HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.28-0.69; P<0.001). For inappropriate ICD therapy, no additional risk reduction for LVEF>50% was seen compared with an LVEF of 36% to 50%. A total of 6 factors were associated with LVEF normalization, and patients with all factors present (n=42) did not experience VTAs (positive predictive value, 100%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who achieve LVEF normalization (>50%) have very low absolute and relative risk of VTAs and a favorable clinical course within 2.2 years of follow-up. Risk of inappropriate ICD therapy is still present, and these patients could be considered for downgrade from CRT-defibrillator to CRT-pacemaker at the time of battery depletion if no VTAs have occurred.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00180271.

What is the lowest value of left ventricular baseline ejection fraction that predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy?

Background

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective treatment option for patients with refractory heart failure. However, many patients do not respond to therapy. Although it has been thought that there was no relation between response to CRT and baseline ejection fraction (EF), the response rate of patients with different baseline LVEF to CRT has not been evaluated in severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction. We aimed to investigate any difference in response to CRT between the severe heart failure patients with different baseline LVEF.

Material/Methods

In this study, 141 consecutive patients (mean age 59±13 years; 89 men) with severe heart failure and complete LBBB were included. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to their baseline LVEF: 5–15%, Group 1; 15–25%, Group 2, and 25–35%, Group 3. NYHA functional class, LVEF, LV volumes, and diameters were assessed at baseline and after 6 months of CRT. A response to CRT was defined as a decrease in LVSVi (left ventricular end-systolic volume index) ≥10% on echocardiography at 6 months.

Results

After 6 months, a significant increase of EF and a significant decrease of LVESVi and LVEDVi after 6 months of CRT were observed in all groups. Although the magnitude of improvement in EF was biggest in the first group, the percentage of decrease in LVESVi and LVEDVi was similar between the groups. The improvement in NYHA functional class was similar in all EF subgroups. At 6-month follow-up, 100 (71%) patients showed a reduction of >10% in LVESVi (mean reduction: −15.5±26.1 ml/m²) and were therefore classified as responders to CRT. Response rate to CRT was similar in all groups. It was 67%, 75%, and 70% in Group 1, 2, and 3, respectively, at 6-month follow-up (p>0.05). There was no statistically significant relation between the response rate to CRT and baseline LVEF, showing that the CRT has beneficial effects even in patients with very low LVEF.

Conclusions

It seems there is no lower limit for baseline LVEF to predict non-response to CRT in eligible patients according to current guidelines.