Response to letter regarding article, "Aortic dilation in bicuspid aortic valve disease: flow pattern is a major contributor and differs with valve fusion type"

Risk Stratification in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Aortopathy: Emerging Evidence and Future Perspectives

The current management of aortic dilatation associated with congenital bicuspid aortic valve (bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy) is based on dimensional parameters (diameter of the aneurysm, growth of the diameter over time) and few other criteria. The disease is however heterogeneous in terms of natural and clinical history and risk of acute complications, ie aortic dissection. Dimensional criteria are now admitted to have limited value as predictors of such complications. Thus, novel principles for risk stratification have been recently investigated, including phenotypic criteria, flow-related metrics, and circulating biomarkers. A systematization of the typical anatomoclinical forms that the aortopathy can assume has led to the identification of the more severe root phenotype, associated with higher risk of progression of the aneurysm and possible higher aortic dissection risk. Four-dimensional-flow magnetic resonance imaging studies are searching for potentially clinically significant metrics of flow derangement, based on the recognized association of local abnormal shear stress with wall pathology. Other research initiatives are addressing the question whether circulating molecules could predict the presence or, more importantly, the future development of aortopathy. The present review summarizes the latest progresses in the knowledge on risk stratification of bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy, focusing on critical aspects and debated points.

Association between bicuspid aortic valve morphotype and regional dilatation of the aortic root and trunk

Thoracic aortic disease, including thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA), is frequently seen in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). We hypothesized that BAV morphotype would be associated with aortic aneurysm phenotypes but that other patient variables would significantly modify this relationship. 829 patients between 18 and 90 years with BAV and available raw imaging of the aortic valve and the ascending aorta to its mid-portion prior to aortic valve and aortic surgery were examined. The sinuses of Valsalva and proximal ascending aorta were measured from 2-dimensional co-planar echocardiographic images. We observed strong associations between patient habitus and raw and normalized dimensions of the aortic root and ascending aorta. Patients with R-L morphotype presented at an older age with larger aortic root but similar ascending aortic dimensions. After accounting for patient morphometric characteristics and severity of aortic valve disease, patients with R-L valve morphotype were marginally more likely to have an aortic root aneurysm (86% vs. 78%; P = 0.043), defined as aortic root dimension Z score ≥3. We observed only small differences in aortic dimensions between BAV morphotypes, that are eclipsed by variation in patient habitus. We interpret these findings to mean that BAV patients will not likely benefit from therapies based on aortic valve morphotype. Rather, we propose that all BAV patients should undergo longitudinal follow-up, independent of valve morphotype. Guidelines for aortic surgery based upon dimensions alone may be improved by considering patient characteristics such as age, body size and other characteristics.