Comparison of Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents With Sirolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents

Longitudinal Neointimal Distribution Pattern After Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: Insights From Optical Coherence Tomography Study

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Everolimus-eluting stents (EES) are established as latest generation drug eluting stents. However, optical coherence tomography (OCT) assessment of neointimal distribution after EES implantation is lacking. We aimed to assess the longitudinal neointimal distribution pattern after EES implantation using OCT.

METHODS

Data from 3 prospective studies (HEAL-EES, REVER and RESERVOIR), including patients with EES implantation and OCT follow-up study, were merged. Analyzed stents were divided into 3 segments of equal length (distal, medial, proximal). Longitudinal neointimal distribution patterns were compared between the 3 segments using generalized estimating equation. Neointimal thickness (NIT), neointimal area obstruction, and uncovered or malapposed struts were analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 86 patients (92 lesions) were analyzed. Time of OCT follow-up was 9.0 ± 1.5 months. NIT was 101.7 ± 65.4 μm and neointimal obstruction area was 12.2 ± 7.6%. The number of assessed struts was the same in all three segments. NIT tended to be higher at the medial segment (108.8 ± 71.1 μm) compared to distal (103.0 ± 63.4 μm) and proximal (93.3 ± 61.1 μm) (p = 0.076). Neointimal area obstruction was significantly different between the 3 segments (12.4 ± 7.5% [distal], 13.1 ± 7.7% [medial], 11.1 ± 7.5% [proximal]; p = 0.037). In the proximal segment, there was a significantly higher frequency of uncovered struts compared to medial and distal segments (3.9% vs. 2.1% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.009). The distribution of malapposed struts was not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

Distribution of neointimal hyperplasia seems to be different between stent segments, being higher in the medial segment as compared to proximal and distal. Whether this may reflect a response to local pre-interventional plaque burden centrally covered by the stent should be confirmed in a future study.

MANUSCRIPT SUMMARY

As optical coherence tomography based assessment of neointimal distribution after everolimus-eluting stent implantation is lacking, we analyzed data of 86 patients (92 lesions) from 3 prospective trials to evaluate neointimal distribution in distal, medial and proximal stent segments. Neointimal hyperplasia seemed to be different between the three segments, with a higher burden in the medial stent segment. Whether this reflects a response to local pre-interventional plaque burden centrally covered by the stent should be confirmed in a future study.

Safety and efficacy of zotarolimus-eluting stents in the treatment of diabetic coronary lesions in Chinese patients: The RESOLUTE-DIABETES CHINA Study

BACKGROUND

The RESOLUTE-DIABETES CHINA study was specifically designed to investigate the safety and efficacy of Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES; Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) in the treatment of diabetic coronary lesions in the Chinese population.

METHODS

In all, 945 patients with de novo native coronary lesions and type 2 diabetes mellitus were recruited at 32 cardiac centers across the Chinese mainland and were implanted with Resolute ZES. The primary endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF); secondary endpoints were clinical outcomes, namely all-cause death, stroke, bleeding, target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), non-TVR, and stent thrombosis (ST). The follow-up period for all endpoints was 12 months after the procedure.

RESULTS

In all, 933 patients (98.73%) had clinical follow-up at 12 months. The rate of TVF was 11.60%, whereas the rate of occurrence of secondary endpoints was 5.47%, with four patients (0.43%) having subacute or late ST. There were no significant differences in TVF rates comparing patients with different HbA1c levels or receiving different glucose control treatments (all P > 0.05). Patients with multivessel lesions had higher TVF rates (95% confidence intervals) than those with single-vessel lesions (16.76% [12.10%-22.97%) vs 9.72% [7.79%-12.11%], respectively; P = 0.006). There were no significant differences in TVF rates in patients with or without small vessels, bifurcated lesions, or chronic total occlusions (all P > 0.05). [Correction added on 17 January 2019, after first online publication: in the second sentence of Results section, "TLF" was changed to "TVF".].

CONCLUSIONS

Resolute ZES may perform well in the Chinese diabetic population, especially in those with poor glucose control, complex lesions, and certain unfavorable clinical features. Further studies are needed to determine why ZES perform well in this population.

Drug-coated balloons for the treatment of in-stent restenosis in diabetic patients: A review of currently available scientific data

After the introduction of drug eluting stent (DES) the rate of in-stent restenosis (ISR) has decreased if compared to the BMS era; however, treatment of patients with ISR remained a major issue for the interventional cardiologist. DES has been largely used with good results also as second layer for the treatment of ISR, but the overall percentage of patients suffering from restenosis still remains high, especially in some subgroups of patients as ones with diabetes mellitus (DM). In this clinical scenario, drug coated balloon (DCB) has been gaining an important role for the treatment of ISR. In fact, it allows to release an antiproliferative drug, namely paclitaxel, without the addition of a second metallic strut, which can lead to a persistent inflammatory stimulus and further narrow the vessel. This could be an advantage in patients with an already increased systemic inflammatory burden and stiffer vessels as those with DM. Despite differences in terms of efficacy and safety between DES and DCB have already been evaluated in different clinical trials, just few of these focused on diabetic patients. The aim of this paper is to review the available data for treatment of ISR both with DES, DCB, and a comparison between these two devices, in patients affected by DM. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Mechanisms and Patterns of Intravascular Ultrasound In-Stent Restenosis Among Bare Metal Stents and First- and Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents

The most common causes of in-stent restenosis (ISR) are intimal hyperplasia and stent under expansion. The purpose of this study was to use intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to compare the ISR mechanisms of bare metal stents (BMS), first-generation drug-eluting stents (DES), and second-generation DES. There were 298 ISR lesions including 52 BMS, 73 sirolimus-eluting stents, 52 paclitaxel-eluting stents, 16 zotarolimus-eluting stents, and 105 everolimus-eluting stent. Mean patient age was 66.6 ± 1.1 years, 74.2% were men, and 48.3% had diabetes mellitus. BMS restenosis presented later (70.0 ± 66.7 months) with more intimal hyperplasia compared with DES (BMS 58.6 ± 15.5%, first-generation DES 52.6 ± 20.9%, second-generation DES 48.2 ± 22.2%, p = 0.02). Although reference lumen areas were similar in BMS and first- and second-generation DES, restenotic DES were longer (BMS 21.8 ± 13.5 mm, first-generation DES 29.4 ± 16.1 mm, second-generation DES 32.1 ± 18.7 mm, p = 0.003), and stent areas were smaller (BMS 7.2 ± 2.4 mm(2), first-generation DES 6.1 ± 2.1 mm(2), second-generation DES 5.7 ± 2.0 mm(2), p <0.001). Stent fracture was seen only in DES (first-generation DES 7 [5.0%], second-generation DES 8 [7.4%], p = 0.13). In conclusion, restenotic first- and second-generation DES were characterized by less neointimal hyperplasia, smaller stent areas, longer stent lengths, and more stent fractures than restenotic BMS.

Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions Editors’ Picks: Most Important Papers in New Drug-Eluting Stents

The following are highlights from the series, Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions Topic Review. This series summarizes the most important articles, as selected by the editors, that have published in the Circulation portfolio. The studies included in this article represent the most noteworthy research in the area of new drug-eluting stents.