Impact of drug-eluting stents and diabetes mellitus in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions: a survey from the Italian Society of Invasive Cardiology

Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Bifurcation Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights from the Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Bifurcation Lesion Interventions Registry

The impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on the outcomes of bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has received limited study. We compared the procedural characteristics and outcomes of patients with and without DM in 1,302 bifurcation PCIs (1,147 patients) performed at 5 centers between 2013 and 2024. The prevalence of DM was 33.8% (n = 388). Patients with diabetes were younger and had more cardiovascular risk factors and greater angiographic complexity, including more main vessel calcification and more frequent stenoses in the left main, proximal left anterior descending, and right coronary artery. There was no difference in technical (95.5% vs 94.9%, p = 0.613) or procedural success (90.2% vs 91.3%, p = 0.540); provisional stenting was used less frequently in patients with diabetes (64.5% vs 71.1%, p = 0.015). Patients with diabetes had higher rates of repeat in-hospital PCI and acute kidney injury. Other in-hospital outcomes were similar after adjusting for confounders. During a median follow-up of 1,095 days, diabetes was independently associated with greater incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (hazard ratio [HR] 2.04, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.52 to 2.72, p <0.001), myocardial infarction (HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.25, p = 0.033), death (HR 2.26, 95% CI 1.46 to 3.51, p <0.001), and target (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.66, p = 0.045) and nontarget (HR 2.00, CI 1.06 to 3.78, p = 0.032) vessel revascularization. Patients with DM who underwent bifurcation PCI had greater risk of in-hospital repeat-PCI and major adverse cardiac events during follow-up than did those without diabetes.

Comparison of clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation in diabetic versus nondiabetic patients in China: A retrospective study

Diabetes mellitus (DM) has been proved to be a predictor of adverse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Drug-eluting stents (DESs) could reduce the adverse events in DM patients. In this study, we aimed to analyze the clinical outcome after DES implantation in diabetic versus nondiabetic patients in China. Totally, 200 Chinese DM patients and 400 Chinese non-DM patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. Compared with non-DM patients, DM patients were more likely to have a higher incidence of cardiac death (3.5% vs. 1.0%, P = .048), stent thrombosis (2.5% vs. 0.5%, P = .044), target lesion revascularization (6.0% vs. 1.8%, P = .005), target vessel failure (15.5% vs. 8.0%, P < .001), target lesion failure (14.0% vs. 4.3%, P < .001), myocardial infarction (4.5% vs. 1.5%, P = .030), and major adverse cardiac events (12.5% vs. 5.0%, P = .001) at 2-year follow-up. However, the incidence of target vessel revascularization (7.5% vs. 5.5%, P = .340) was similar between DB and non-DB patients. Patients with DB (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.54, P = .001), older than 80 years (HR = 1.33, P = .027) with hypercholesterolemia (HR = 1.03, P < .001), serum creatinine >177 μmol/L (HR = 3.04, P = .011), a history of cerebral vascular accident (HR = 4.29, P = .010), or a history of myocardial infarction (HR = 31.4, P < .001) were more likely to experience adverse events. In China, DM could also be served as an independent predictor of adverse outcomes after DES implantation. These patients should be reexamined more frequently.

Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Provisional Stenting in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions J-REVERSE Sub-Study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on provisional coronary bifurcation stenting under the complete guidance of intravascular-ultrasound (IVUS).

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of such intervention has not yet been fully elucidated in the DM patients.

METHODS

A total of 100 DM and 139 non-DM patients in a prospective multi-center registry of IVUS-guided bifurcation stenting were compared in angiographic results at 9 months. Vessel and luminal changes during the intervention were analyzed using the IVUS. Vascular healing at the follow-up was also investigated in 23 lesions in each group using optical coherence tomography (OCT).

RESULTS

No difference was detected regarding baseline reference vessel diameter and minimum lumen diameter in proximal main vessel (MV), distal MV, and side branch (SB). The rate of everolimus-eluting stent use (78.4% vs. 78.3%), final kissing inflation (60.1% vs. 49.0%), and conversion to 2-stent strategy (2.9% vs. 2.8%) were also similar. In the DM group, late loss was greater in proximal MV (DM 0.23 ± 0.29 vs. non-DM 0.16 ± 0.24 mm, P < 0.05) and SB (0.04 ± 0.49 vs. -0.08 ± 0.35 mm, P < 0.05). Smaller vessel area restricted stent expansion in the proximal MV (6.18 ± 1.67 vs. 6.72 ± 2.07 mm² , P < 0.05). More inhomogeneous neointimal coverage (unevenness score, 1.90 ± 0.33 vs. 1.72 ± 0.29, P < 0.05) and more frequent thrombus attachment (26% vs. 4%, P < 0.05) were documented in the proximal MV at 9-month follow-up OCT.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite IVUS optimization for coronary bifurcation, DM is potentially associated with smaller luminal gain, higher late-loss, and inhomogeneous vascular healing with frequent thrombus attachment in the proximal MV.

Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions Editors’ Picks

The following are highlights from the series, Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions Topic Review. This series summarizes the most important articles, as selected by the editors, which have been published in the Circulation portfolio . The studies included in this article represent the most noteworthy research in the area of bifurcation disease.