Selective proximal renal denervation guided by autonomic responses evoked via high-frequency stimulation in a preclinical canine model

Effects of bilateral renal denervation on open-loop baroreflex function and urine excretion in spontaneously hypertensive rats

Bilateral renal denervation (RDN) decreases arterial pressure (AP) or delays the development of hypertension in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), but whether bilateral RDN significantly modifies urine output function during baroreflex-mediated acute AP changes remains unknown. We quantified the relationship between AP and normalized urine flow (nUF) in SHR that underwent bilateral RDN (n = 9) and compared the results with those in sham-operated SHR (n = 9). Moreover, we examined the acute effect of an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker telmisartan (2.5 mg/kg) on the AP-nUF relationship. Bilateral RDN significantly decreased AP by narrowing the response range of the total arc of the carotid sinus baroreflex. The slopes of nUF versus the mean AP (in μL·min-1·kg-1·mmHg-1) in the sham and RDN groups under baseline conditions were 0.076 ± 0.045 and 0.188 ± 0.039, respectively; and those after telmisartan administration were 0.285 ± 0.034 and 0.416 ± 0.078, respectively. The effect of RDN on the nUF slope was marginally significant (P = 0.059), which may have improved the controllability of urine output in the RDN group. The effect of telmisartan on the nUF slope was significant (P < 0.001) in the sham and RDN groups, signifying the contribution of circulating or locally produced angiotensin II to determining urine output function regardless of ongoing renal sympathetic nerve activity.

Efficacy and safety of sympathetic mapping and ablation of renal nerves for the treatment of hypertension (SMART): 6-month follow-up of a randomised, controlled trial

Background

Previous trials of renal denervation (RDN) have been designed to investigate reduction of blood pressure (BP) as the primary efficacy endpoint using non-selective RDN without intraoperatively verified RDN success. It is an unmet clinical need to map renal nerves, selectively denervate renal sympathetic nerves, provide readouts for the interventionalists and avoid futile RDN. We aimed to examine the safety and efficacy of renal nerve mapping/selective renal denervation (msRDN) in patients with uncontrolled hypertension (HTN) and determine whether antihypertensive drug burden is reduced while office systolic BP (OSBP) is controlled to target level (＜140 mmHg).

Methods

We conducted a randomized, prospective, multicenter, single-blinded, sham-controlled trial. The study combined two efficacy endpoints at 6 months as primary outcomes: The control rate of patients with OSBP ＜140 mmHg (non-inferior outcome) and change in the composite index of antihypertensive drugs (Drug Index) in the treatment versus Sham group (superior outcome). This design avoids confounding from excess drug-taking in the Sham group. Antihypertensive drug burden was assessed by a composite index constructed as: Class N (number of classes of antihypertensive drugs) × (sum of doses). 15 hospitals in China participated in the study and 220 patients were enrolled in a 1:1 ratio (msRDN vs Sham). The key inclusion criteria included: age (18-65 years old), history of essential HTN (at least 6 months), heart rate (≥70 bpm), OSBP (≥150 mmHg and ≤180 mmHg), ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM, 24-h SBP ≥130 mmHg or daytime SBP ≥135 mmHg or nighttime SBP ≥120 mmHg), renal artery stenosis (＜50%) and renal function (eGFR ＞45 mL/min/1.73 m2). The catheter with both stimulation and ablation functions was inserted in the distal renal main artery. The RDN site (hot spot) was selected if SBP increased (≥5 mmHg) by intra-renal artery (RA) electrical stimulation; an adequate RDN was confirmed by repeated electronic stimulation if no increase in BP otherwise, a 2nd ablation was performed at the same site. At sites where there was decreased SBP (≥5 mmHg, cold spot) or no BP response (neutral spot) to stimulation, no ablation was performed. The mapping, ablation and confirmation procedure was repeated until the entire renal main artery had been tested then either treated or avoided. After msRDN, patients had to follow a predefined, vigorous drug titration regimen in order to achieve target OSBP (＜140 mmHg). Drug adherence was monitored by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis using urine. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02761811) and 5-year follow-up is ongoing.

Findings

Between July 8, 2016 and February 23, 2022, 611 patients were consented, 220 patients were enrolled in the study who received standardized antihypertensive drug treatments (at least two drugs) for at least 28 days, presented OSBP ≥150 mmHg and ≤180 mmHg and met all inclusion and exclusion criteria. In left RA and right RA, mapped sites were 8.2 (3.0) and 8.0 (2.7), hot/ablated sites were 3.7 (1.4) and 4.0 (1.6), cold spots were 2.4 (2.6) and 2.0 (2.2), neutral spots were 2.0 (2.1) and 2.0 (2.1), respectively. Hot, cold and neutral spots was 48.0%, 27.5% and 24.4% of total mapped sites, respectively. At 6 M, the Control Rate of OSBP was comparable between msRDN and Sham group (95.4% vs 92.8%, p = 0.429), achieved non-inferiority margin -10% (2.69%; 95% CI -4.11%, 9.83%, p ＜ 0.001 for non-inferiority); the change in Drug Index was significantly lower in msRDN group compared to Sham group (4.37 (6.65) vs 7.61 (10.31), p = 0.010) and superior to Sham group (-3.25; 95% CI -5.56, -0.94, p = 0.003), indicating msRDN patients need significantly fewer drugs to control OSBP ＜140 mmHg. 24-hour ambulatory SBP decreased from 146.8 (13.9) mmHg by 10.8 (14.1) mmHg, and from 149.8 (12.8) mmHg by 10.0 (14.0) mmHg in msRDN and Sham groups, respectively (p < 0.001 from Baseline; p > 0.05 between groups). Safety profiles were comparable between msRDN and Sham groups, demonstrating the safety and efficacy of renal mapping/selective RDN to treat uncontrolled HTN.

Interpretation

The msRDN therapy achieved the goals of reducing the drug burden of HTN patients and controlling OSBP <140 mmHg, with only approximately four targeted ablations per renal main artery, much lower than in previous trials.

Funding

SyMap Medical (Suzhou), LTD, Suzhou, China.

Rationale and Design of Sympathetic Mapping/Ablation of Renal Nerves Trial (SMART) for the Treatment of Hypertension: a Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Blind, Randomized and Sham Procedure-Controlled Study

Renal denervation (RDN) is proposed as a durable and patient compliance independent treatment for hypertension. However, 20-30% non-responder after RDN treatment weakened the therapeutic effect, which may be due to blind ablation. The renal nerve mapping/selective ablation system developed by SyMap Medical Ltd (Suzhou), China, has the function of mapping renal sympathetic/parasympathetic nerve sites and selectively removing renal sympathetic nerves and is expected to meet the urgent unmet clinical need of targeted RDN. The "Sympathetic Mapping/Ablation of Renal Nerves Trial" (SMART) is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, single-blinded, sham procedure-controlled trial, to evaluate the safety and efficacy of targeted renal sympathetic denervation in patients with essential and uncontrolled hypertension. The study is the first clinical registry trial using a targeted RDN for the treatment of uncontrolled hypertension; the dual-endpoint design can answer the question of how many antihypertensive drugs can be reduced in patients after RDN. The trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov NCT02761811.

Renal nerve stimulation identifies renal innervation and optimizes the strategy for renal denervation in canine

BACKGROUND

Renal denervation (RDN) was still performed without any intra-procedural method for nerve mapping. Whether renal nerve stimulation (RNS) is an efficient way to identify renal autonomic innervation and optimize the strategy for RDN remain to be worthy for further exploration.

METHODS

The characteristics of renal autonomic innervation at the sites with different blood pressure (BP) responses to RNS were explored. Then, dogs anatomically eligible for RDN were randomly assigned into elevated BP response ablation group, reduced BP response ablation group, and RNS-control group. The postoperative outcomes were measured at baseline and after 4 weeks follow-up.

RESULTS

The proportion of afferent sensory nerve was higher at elevated BP response sites (ERS) than reduced BP response sites (RRS) and non-response sites (NRS) (P = 0.012 and P = 0.004). Conversely, the proportion of parasympathetic nerve at RRS was the highest (RRS vs. ERS, P = 0.017; RRS vs. NRS, P = 0.023). More importantly, there was a significant correlation between systolic blood pressure changes and the area ratios of afferent sensory and parasympathetic nerve (R = 0.859; P < 0.001). In addition, ablation at BP-elevation sites can result in a significant decrease in BP and plasma norepinephrine (NE) after 4 weeks (P = 0.002; P = 0.008), while ablation at BP-reduction sites can lead to significant increases in BP and plasma NE (P = 0.016; P = 0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

RNS is an effective method to identify renal autonomic innervation. It could not only help to identify optimal target sites, but also avoid ablation of sympathetic-inhibitory areas during RDN.

The intrarenal blood pressure modulation system is differentially altered after renal denervation guided by different intensities of blood pressure responses

The aim of this study was to investigate alterations in the intrarenal blood pressure (BP) regulation system after renal denervation (RDN) guided by renal nerve stimulation (RNS). Twenty-one dogs were randomized to receive RDN at strong (SRA group, n = 7) or weak (WRA group, n = 7) BP-elevation response sites identified by RNS or underwent RNS only (RNS-control, RSC, n = 7). After 4 weeks of follow-up, renal sympathetic components, the main components of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and the major transporters involved in sodium and water reabsorption were assessed by immunohistochemical analysis. Compared with RSC treatment, RDN therapy significantly reduced renal norepinephrine and tyrosine hydroxylase levels, decreased the renin content and inhibited the onsite generation of angiotensinogen. Moreover, the expression of exciting axis components, including angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), angiotensin II and angiotensin II type-1 receptor, was downregulated, while protective axis components for the cardiovascular system, including ACE2 and Mas receptors, were upregulated in both WRA and SRA groups. Moreover, RDN reduced the abundance of aquaporin-1 and aquaporin-2 in kidneys. Although RDN had a minimal effect on overall NKCC2 expression, its activation (p-NKCC2) and directional enrichment in the apical membrane (mNKCC2) were dramatically blunted. All these changes were more obvious in the SRA group than WRA group. Selective RDN guided by RNS effectively reduced systemic BP by affecting the renal neurohormone system, as well as the sodium and water transporter system, and these effects at sites with a strong BP response were more superior.

The role of renal nerve stimulation in percutaneous renal denervation for hypertension: A mini-review

Recent trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of percutaneous renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) for blood pressure (BP)-lowering in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Nevertheless, major challenges exist, such as the wide variation of BP-lowering responses following RDN (from strong response to no response) and lack of feasible and reproducible peri-procedural predictors for patient response. Both animal and human studies have demonstrated different patterns of BP responses following renal nerve stimulation (RNS), possibly related to varied regional proportions of sympathetic and parasympathetic nerve tissues along the renal arteries. Animal studies of RNS have shown that rapid electrical stimulation of the renal arteries caused renal artery vasoconstriction and increased norepinephrine secretion with a concomitant increase in BP, and the responses were attenuated after RDN. Moreover, selective RDN at sites with strong RNS-induced BP increases led to a more efficient BP-lowering effect. In human, when RNS was performed before and after RDN, blunted changes in RNS-induced BP responses were noted after RDN. The systolic BP response induced by RNS before RDN and blunted systolic BP response to RNS after RDN, at the site with maximal RNS-induced systolic BP response before RDN, both correlated with the 24-h ambulatory BP reductions 3-12 months following RDN. In summary, RNS-induced BP changes, before and after RDN, could be used to assess the immediate effect of RDN and predict BP reductions months following RDN. More comprehensive, large-scale and long term trials are needed to verify these findings.

Present Evidence of Determinants to Predict the Efficacy of Renal Denervation

Sympathetic overactivation is one of the main contributors to development and progress of hypertension. Renal denervation (RDN) has been evidenced by series of clinical trials for its efficacy and safety to treat overactivated sympathetic nervous system induced diseases. However, the results were inconsistent and not all patients benefited from RDN. Appropriate patient selection and intraoperative factors to improve the efficacy of RDN need to be solved urgently. Over the decade, research studies on the correlations between indicators and the antihypertensive effects have been conducted and made a fairly well progress. Herein, we comprehensively reviewed the research studies on how to make RDN more predictable or improve the efficacy of RDN and summarized these potential indicators or devices which might be applied in clinical settings.

Effectiveness of renal denervation in the treatment of hypertension: a literature review

BACKGROUND

Catheter-based renal denervation has been studied as a potential therapeutic option to reduce high blood pressure (BP). Preclinical studies in some experimental models have demonstrated an antihypertensive effect of renal denervation but reports from clinical trials have been mixed METHODS: We performed a literature search using combinations of the key terms 'Cardiovascular diseases, Clinical trial, Pre-clinical trials, Resistant hypertension, Renal denervation, Ablation technique, Radiofrequency ablation, Ultrasound ablation, RADIANCE SOLO, SYMPLICITY HTN, SYPRAL HTN'. The databases searched were PubMed and OVID Medline.

RESULTS

The initial SYMPLICITY HTN-1 AND HTN-2 clinical trials reported significant decreases in office BP but results from the more robustly designed SYMPLICITY HTN-3 trial, which included sham controls and ambulatory BP monitoring, showed no significant antihypertensive effect. Interest in the use of renal denervation in hypertension was once again sparked by favourable results from the SPYRAL HTN-OFF Med trial CONCLUSION: We provide a thorough, critical analysis of key preclinical and clinical studies investigating the efficacy of catheter-based renal denervation as a treatment for hypertension and highlight future areas for research to allow better translation into clinical practice.

Mapping Renal Innervations by Renal Nerve Stimulation and Characterizations of Blood Pressure Response Patterns

Increased sympathetic nervous activity is one of main contributors to pathogenesis and progression of hypertension. Renal denervation (RDN) has been demonstrated as a potential therapy for treatment of hypertension; however, lack of indicators of intra-/post-procedure results in inconsistent clinical outcomes. Renal nerve stimulation (RNS), a simple and promising method, could evoke elevated blood pressure as an intraoperative indicator for RDN. But related researches on patterns of blood pressure responses to RNS are still incomplete. To investigate and categorize the phenotypes of blood pressure response to RNS and heart rate alteration before and after RNS, 24 Chinese Kunming dogs were used to perform RNS from bifurcation to ostium of renal arteries after angiography, and a total of 483 stimulated sites were complete. We identified five different patterns of blood pressure response to RNS in 483 stimulated sites, (1) continuous ascending and finally keeping steady above baseline (26.9%), (2) declining and then rising over baseline (11.8%), (3) declining and then rising but below baseline (14.5%), (4) fluctuating in the vicinity of baseline (39.5%), and (5) continuous declining and finally keeping steady below baseline (7.2%), and found no difference in RR intervals among five blood pressure responses before and after renal nerve stimulation. Renal nerve stimulation could elicit different patterns of blood pressure response, which could potentially assist in distinguishing sympathetic-excitatory sites and sympathetic-inhibitory sites from mixed nerve components, which might help to improve the efficacy of RDN.

Resistant Hypertension: Where are We Now and Where Do We Go from Here?

Resistant hypertension is an important subtype of hypertension that leads to an increased risk of cerebrovascular, cardiovascular, and kidney disease. The revised guidelines from the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association now define resistant hypertension as blood pressure that remains above goal despite use of three maximally titrated anti-hypertensive medications including a diuretic or as a hypertensive patient who requires 4 or more agents for adequate BP control. These agents typically include a calcium-channel blocker, a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor, and a diuretic at maximal or maximally tolerated doses. As recognition of resistant hypertension increases, it is important to distinguish pseudo-resistant or apparent hypertension from true resistant hypertension. Etiologies of apparent resistant hypertension include measurement error and medication non-adherence. The prevalence of true resistant hypertension is likely much lower than reported in the literature when accounting for patients with apparent resistant hypertension. Evaluation of patients with true resistant hypertension includes screening for causes of secondary hypertension and interfering medications. Successful management of resistant hypertension includes lifestyle modification and optimization of medical therapy, often including the use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. Looking ahead at developments in hypertension management, a slew of new device-based therapies are under active development. Of these, renal denervation is the closest to routine clinical application. Further study is needed before these devices can be recommended in the routine treatment of resistant hypertension.

Renal denervation as a synergistic tool for the treatment of polymorphic ventricular ectopic beats: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Ventricular ectopic beats (VEBs) are very common and often occur in hypertensive or obese individuals, as well as in patients presenting with either sleep apnea or structural cardiac disease. Sympathetic overactivity plays a crucial role in the development, continuation, and exacerbation of ventricular arrhythmias. Recent studies have reported the relevance of sympathetic activation in patients with ventricular arrhythmias and suggested a potential role for catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) in reducing the arrhythmic burden.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We describe a 38-year-old female symptomatic patient that at the time of presentation was complaining of fatigue in response to minor and medium efforts and not tolerating any physical activity, and episodes of tachycardia associated with dyspnoea, pre-syncope, and syncope.

DIAGNOSIS

She had a high incidence of polymorphic VEBs on 24-hour-Holter monitoring who also presented with left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy for which she was treated with bisoprolol 10 mg/d. The 24-hour-Holter on bisoprolol at baseline showed sinus rhythm with an average heart rate of 92 bpm. There were 44,743 isolated VEBs. A total of 2538 nonsustained ventricular tachycardia events were registered. Her cardiac magnetic resonance imaging showed an increase in LV diastolic diameter and impairment of the right ventricle.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient underwent endocardial ablation of the right ventricular outflow tract and the LV free lateral wall, and concomitantly underwent bilateral RDN.

OUTCOMES

Three months post-procedure, her 24-hour-Holter off medication demonstrated an average heart rate 72 bpm and a substantially reduced number of 2823 isolated monomorphic VEBs. Thus far, 18-months follow-up, she has been asymptomatic and doing physical exercises.

CONCLUSION

In our current patient, we used RDN as a synergistic method to attenuate the sympathetic overactivity, which is narrowly linked to VEBs appearance. Our case report highlighted that RDN may become a potential adjuvant treatment for VEBs in the future.

Laparoscopic based renal denervation in a canine neurogenic hypertension model

BACKGROUND

Previous renal denervation (RDN) studies showed controversial results in reducing blood pressure. The aim of this study was to provide evidence supporting the effectiveness of laparoscopic-based renal denervation (L-RDN) in treating hypertension.

METHODS

Sixteen Beagle dogs were randomly divided into RDN group (n = 12) and sham group (n = 4). Neurogenic hypertension was generated in all dogs via carotid artery route. L-RDN was performed in the RDN group, with sham operation performed as a control. Blood pressure (BP) changes were recorded at 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks after the procedure. Changes in serum creatinine (sCr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and level of norepinephrine (NE) were analyzed. Histological changes of kidney and renal arteries were also evaluated.

RESULTS

BP and NE levels were significantly elevated after hypertension induction (p < 0.01). Systolic and diastolic BP of RDN group were decreased by 15.5 mmHg and 7.3 mmHg (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0021, respectively) at the eighth week after L-RDN. Invasive systolic and diastolic BP of RDN group were significantly decreased by 14.5 mmHg and 15.3 mmHg (p < 0.0001). In contrast, there was no significant decrease in blood pressure in the sham group. In addition, RDN group but not the sham group showed a significant decrease in NE levels (p < 0.001), while no significant changes in sCr and BUN were observed in both groups. Pathological examinations showed no discernible damage, tear, or dissection to the renal arteries in RND group.

CONCLUSIONS

L-RDN lowered BP and NE levels in hypertensive dogs without affecting renal artery morphology and kidney function.

The Impact of Renal Denervation on the Progression of Heart Failure in a Canine Model Induced by Right Ventricular Rapid Pacing

Heart failure (HF) has been proposed as a potential indication of renal denervation (RDN). However, the mechanisms enabling RDN to attenuate HF are not well understood, especially the central effects of RDN. The aim of this study was to decipher the mode of operation of RDN in the treatment of HF using a canine model of right ventricular rapid pacing-induced HF. Accordingly, 24 Chinese Kunming dogs were randomly grouped to receive sham procedure (sham-operated group), bilateral RDN (RDN group), rapid pacing to induce HF (HF-control group), and bilateral RDN plus rapid pacing (RDN + HF group). Echocardiography, plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and norepinephrine (NE) concentrations of randomized dogs were measured at baseline and 4 weeks after interventions, followed by histological and molecular analyses. Twenty dogs completed the research successfully and were enrolled for data analyses. Results showed that the average optical density of renal efferent and afferent nerves were significantly lower in the RDN and RDN + HF groups than in the sham-operated group, with a significant reduction of renal NE concentration. Rapid pacing in the RDN + HF and HF-control groups, compared with the sham-operated group, induced a significant increase in left ventricular end-diastolic volume and decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction and correspondingly resulted in cardiac fibrosis and dysfunction. Cardiac fibrosis evaluated by Masson’s trichrome staining and the expression of transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) were significantly higher in the HF-control group than in the sham-operated group, which were remarkably attenuated by the application of the RDN technique in the RDN + HF group. In terms of central renin–angiotensin system (RAS), the expression of angiotensin II (AngII)/angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)/AngII type 1 receptor (AT1R) in the hypothalamus of dogs in the HF-control group, compared with the sham-operated group, was upregulated and that of the angiotensin-(1-7) [Ang-(1-7)]/ACE2 was downregulated. Furthermore, both of them were significantly attenuated by the RDN therapy in the RDN + HF group. In conclusion, the RDN technique could damage renal nerves and suppress the cardiac remodeling procedure in canine with HF while concomitantly attenuating the overactivity of central RAS in the hypothalamus.

Selective Renal Denervation Guided by Renal Nerve Stimulation in Canine

Renal nerve stimulation (RNS) can result in substantial blood pressure (BP) elevation, and the change was significantly blunted when repeated stimulation after ablation. However, whether RNS could provide a meaningful renal nerve mapping for identification of optimal ablation targets in renal denervation (RDN) is not fully clear. Here, we compared the antihypertensive effects of selective RDN guided by two different BP responses to RNS and explored the nerve innervations at these sites in Kunming dogs. Our data indicated that ablation at strong-response sites showed a more systolic BP-lowering effect than at weak-response sites ( P =0.002), as well as lower levels of tyrosine hydroxylase and norepinephrine in kidney and a greater reduction in plasma norepinephrine ( P =0.004 for tyrosine hydroxylase, P =0.002 for both renal and plasma norepinephrine). Strong-response sites showed a greater total area and mean number of renal nerves than weak-response sites ( P =0.012 for total area and P <0.001 for mean number). Systolic BP-elevation response to RNS before RDN and blunted systolic BP-elevation to RNS after RDN were correlated with systolic BP changes at 4 weeks follow-up ( R =0.649; P =0.012 and R =0.643; P =0.013). Changes of plasma norepinephrine and renal norepinephrine levels at 4 weeks were also correlated with systolic BP changes at 4 weeks ( R =0.837, P <0.001 and R =0.927, P <0.001). These data suggest that selective RDN at sites with strong BP-elevation response to RNS could lead to a more efficient RDN. RNS is an effective method to identify the nerve-enriched area during RDN procedure and improve the efficacy of RDN.

Neuromodulation for the Treatment of Heart Rhythm Disorders

•

Derangement of autonomic nervous signaling is an important contributor to cardiac arrhythmogenesis.

•

Modulation of autonomic nervous signaling holds significant promise for the prevention and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias.

•

Further clinical investigation is necessary to establish the efficacy and safety of autonomic modulatory therapies in reducing cardiac arrhythmias.

There is an increasing recognition of the importance of interactions between the heart and the autonomic nervous system in the pathophysiology of arrhythmias. These interactions play a role in both the initiation and maintenance of arrhythmias and are important in both atrial and ventricular arrhythmia. Given the importance of the autonomic nervous system in the pathophysiology of arrhythmias, there has been notable effort in the field to improve existing therapies and pioneer additional interventions directed at cardiac-autonomic targets. The interventions are targeted to multiple and different anatomic targets across the neurocardiac axis. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the rationale for neuromodulation in the treatment of arrhythmias and to review the specific treatments under evaluation and development for the treatment of both atrial fibrillation and ventricular arrhythmias.

Synergy of pulmonary vein isolation and catheter renal denervation in atrial fibrillation complicated with uncontrolled hypertension: Mapping the renal sympathetic nerve and pulmonary vein (the pulmonary vein isolation plus renal denervation strategy)?

INTRODUCTION

Disturbance of sympathetic and vagal nervous system participates in the pathogenesis of hypertension and atrial fibrillation (AF). Renal denervation (RDN) can modulate autonomic nervous activity and reduce blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive patients. We aimed to evaluate the effect of RDN combined with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with AF and hypertension.

METHODS

Clinical trials including randomized data comparing PVI plus RDN vs PVI alone were enrolled. Primary outcome was incidence of AF recurrence after procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 387 patients, of them 252 were randomized and were enrolled. Mean age was 57 ± 10 years, 71% were male, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 57.4% ± 6.9%. Follow-up for randomized data was 12 months. Overall comparison for primary outcome showed that PVI + RDN was associated with significantly lower AF recurrence as compared with PVI alone (35.8% vs 55.4%, P < 0.0001). This advantageous effect was consistently maintained among randomized patients (37.3% vs 61.9%, odds ratio = 0.37, P = 0.0001), and among patients with implanted devices for detection of AF recurrence (38.9% vs 61.6%, P = 0.007). Post-hoc sensitivity and regression analysis demonstrated very good stability of this primary result. Pooled Kaplan-Meier analysis further showed that PVI + RDN was associated with significantly higher freedom from AF recurrence as compared with PVI alone (log-rank test, P = 0.001). Besides, RDN resulted in significant BP reduction without additionally increasing the risk of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

RDN may provide synergetic effects with PVI to reduce the burden of AF and improve BP control in patients with AF and uncontrolled hypertension.

Anatomy and neural remodeling of the renal sympathetic nerve in a canine model and patients with hypertension

BACKGROUND

The role of renal sympathetic nerve (RSN) in hypertension should be better understood. We aimed to three-dimensionally reconstruct the renal nerves, and explore its anatomical and histochemical characteristics in hypertensive canine model and patients.

METHODS

Renal arteries with surrounding tissue were collected from canines and cadavers with or without hypertension. Serial renal artery hematoxylin-eosin sections were used for three-dimensional reconstruction, and morphological parameters were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

In hypertensive canines, the mean renal nerve number was 26.71 ± 5.68 versus 19.84 ± 5.68 in controls (P = 0.02), and the middle renal nerve volume was 5.31 ± 2.13 versus 2.60 ± 1.00 μl in controls (P = 0.01). Renal tissue norepinephrine concentrations, tyrosine hydroxylase and substance P immunoreactivity in RSN, and growth-associated protein 43 immunoreactivity in renal ganglion were significantly increased in hypertensive canines. In humans, the renal nerve was evenly distributed along the renal artery in a network pattern. The renal ganglion volume was 72.75 ± 33.43 in hypertensive patients versus 37.04 ± 23.95 μl in controls (P = 0.029) and the mean neuronal size in renal ganglion was 1187.3 ± 219.9 μm in patients versus 714.8 ± 142.7 μm in controls (P = 0.002). Tyrosine hydroxylase immunoreactivity in the RSN was 0.153 ± 0.014 in patients versus 0.104 ± 0.019 in controls (P = 0.013). Growth-associated protein 43 immunoreactivity in the renal ganglion was 86 612.8 ± 14 642.0 in patients versus 33 469.8 ± 15 666.8 μm/mm in controls (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that RSN and renal ganglion histological remodeling occurs in individuals with hypertension and the distal segment or branches of renal artery might be a promising therapeutic target for RSN modulation therapy.

Selective vs. Global Renal Denervation: a Case for Less Is More

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Review the renal nerve anatomy and physiology basics and explore the concept of global vs. selective renal denervation (RDN) to uncover some of the fundamental limitations of non-targeted renal nerve ablation and the potential superiority of selective RDN.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent trials testing the efficacy of RDN showed mixed results. Initial investigations targeted global RDN as a therapeutic goal. The repeat observation of heterogeneous response to RDN including non-responders with lack of a BP reduction, or even more unsettling, BP elevations after RDN has raised concern for the detrimental effects of unselective global RDN. Subsequent studies have suggested the presence of a heterogeneous fiber population and the potential utility of renal nerve stimulation to identify sympatho-stimulatory fibers or "hot spots." The recognition that RDN can produce heterogeneous afferent sympathetic effects both change therapeutic goals and revitalize the potential of therapeutic RDN to provide significant clinical benefits. Renal nerve stimulation has emerged as potential tool to identify sympatho-stimulatory fibers, avoid sympatho-inhibitory fibers, and thus guide selective RDN.

Renal Nerve Stimulation as Procedural End Point for Renal Sympathetic Denervation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) as treatment option for hypertension has a strong rationale; however, variable effects on blood pressure (BP) have been reported ranging from non-response to marked reductions in BP. The absence of a procedural end point for RDN is one of the potential factors associated with the variable response. Studies have suggested the use of renal nerve stimulation (RNS) to adequately address this issue. This review aims to provide an overview of the clinical and experimental data available regarding the effects of RNS in the setting of RDN.

RECENT FINDINGS

Animal studies have shown that high-frequency electrical stimulation of the sympathetic nerves in the adventitia of the renal arteries elicits an increase in BP and leads to an increased norepinephrine spillover as a marker of increased sympathetic activity and these effects of stimulation were attenuated or blunted after RDN. In a human feasibility study using RNS both before and after RDN, similar BP responses were observed. Moreover, in patients with resistant hypertension, RNS-induced changes in BP appeared to be correlated with 24-h BP response after RDN. These data suggest that RNS is a useful tool to identify renal sympathetic nerve fibers in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension undergoing RDN, and to predict the likely effectiveness of RDN treatments. In acute procedural settings both in animal and human models, RNS elicits increase in BP and HR before RDN and these effects are blunted after RDN. Up to now, there is preliminary evidence that the RNS-induced BP changes predict 24-h ABPM outcome at follow-up in patients with resistant hypertension. Of note, studies are small sized and results of large trials comparing conventional RDN to RNS-guided RDN are warranted.

Renal Artery Vasodilation May Be An Indicator of Successful Sympathetic Nerve Damage During Renal Denervation Procedure

Autonomic nervous system plays a crucial role in maintaining and regulating vessel tension. Renal denervation (RDN) may induce renal artery vasodilation by damaging renal sympathetic fibers. We conducted this animal study to evaluate whether renal artery vasodilation could be a direct indicator of successful RDN. Twenty-eight Chinese Kunming dogs were randomly assigned into three groups and underwent RDN utilizing temperature-controlled catheter (group A, n = 11) or saline-irrigated catheter (group B, n = 11) or sham procedure (group C, n = 6). Renal angiography, blood pressure (BP) and renal artery vasodilation measurements were performed at baseline, 30-minute, 1-month, and 3-month after interventions. Plasma norepinephrine concentrations were tested at baseline and 3-month after intervention. Results showed that, in addition to significant BP reduction, RDN induced significant renal artery vasodilation. Correlation analyses showed that the induced renal artery vasodilation positively correlated with SBP reduction and plasma norepinephrine reduction over 3 months after ablation. Post hoc analyses showed that saline-irrigated catheter was superior to TC catheter in renal artery vasodilation, especially for the acute dilatation of renal artery at 30-minute after RDN. In conclusion, renal artery vasodilation, induced by RDN, may be a possible indicator of successful renal nerve damage and a predictor of blood pressure response to RDN.

The effect of two different renal denervation strategies on blood pressure in resistant hypertension: Comparison of full-length versus proximal renal artery ablation

BACKGROUND

Renal denervation (RDN) is used to manage blood pressure (BP) in patients with resistant hypertension (rHT), but effectiveness is still a concern, and key arterial portion for successful RDN is not clear.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of proximal versus full-length renal artery ablation in patients with resistant hypertension (rHT).

METHODS

Forty-seven patients with rHT were randomly assigned to receive full-length ablation (n = 23) or proximal ablation (n = 24) of the renal arteries. All lesions were treated with radiofrequency energy via a saline-irrigated catheter. Office BP was measured during 12 months of follow-up and ambulatory BP at baseline and 6 months (n = 15 in each group).

RESULTS

Compared with full-length ablation, proximal ablation reduced the number of ablation points in both the right (6.1 ± 0.7 vs. 3.3 ± 0.6, P < 0.001) and the left renal arteries (6.2 ± 0.7 vs. 3.3 ± 0.8, P < 0.001), with significantly shorter RF delivery time (P < 0.001), but higher RF power (P = 0.011). Baseline office BPs was 179.4 ± 13.7/102.8 ± 9.4 mm Hg in the full-length group and 181.9 ± 12.8/103.5 ± 8.9 mm Hg in the proximal group (P > 0.5). Similar office BPs was reduced by -39.4 ± 11.5/-20.9 ± 7.1 mm Hg at 6 months and -38.2 ± 10.3/-21.5 ± 5.8 mm Hg at 12 months in the full-length group (P < 0.001), -42.0 ± 11.6/-21.4 ± 7.9 mm Hg at 6 months and -40.9 ± 10.3/-22.1 ± 5.6 mm Hg at 12 months in the proximal group (P < 0.001), and progressive BP reductions were observed over the 6 months (P < 0.001) in both groups. The drop in ambulatory 24-hr SBP and DBP were significantly less than the drop in office BP (P < 0.001). No renovascular or other adverse complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that proximal RDN has a similar efficacy and safety profile compared with full-length RDN, and propose the proximal artery as the key portion for RDN. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Comparison of miRNA expression profiles in pituitary-adrenal axis between Beagle and Chinese Field dogs after chronic stress exposure

MicoRNAs (miRNAs), usually as gene regulators, participate in various biological processes, including stress responses. The hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal axis (HPA axis) is an important pathway in regulating stress response. Although the mechanism that HPA axis regulates stress response has been basically revealed, the knowledge that miRNAs regulate stress response within HPA axis, still remains poor. The object of this study was to investigate the miRNAs in the pituitary and adrenal cortex that regulate chronic stress response with high-throughput sequencing. The pituitary and adrenal cortex of beagles and Chinese Field dogs (CFD) from a stress exposure group (including beagle pituitary 1 (BP1), CFD pituitary 1 (CFDP1), beagle adrenal cortex 1 (BAC1), CFD adrenal cortex 1 (CFDAC1)) and a control group (including beagle pituitary 2 (BP2), CFD pituitary 2 (CFDP2), beagle adrenal cortex 2 (BAC2), CFD adrenal cortex 2 (CFDAC2)), were selected for miRNA-seq comparisons. Comparisons, that were made in pituitary (including BP1 vs. BP2, CFDP1 vs. CFDP2, BP1 vs. CFDP1 and BP2 vs. CFDP2) and adrenal cortex (including BAC1 vs. BAC2, CFDAC1 vs. CFDAC2, BAC1 vs. CFDAC1 and BAC2 vs. CFDAC2), showed that a total of 39 and 18 common differentially expressed miRNAs (DE-miRNAs) (Total read counts > 1,000, Fold change > 2 & p-value < 0.001), that shared in at least two pituitary comparisons and at least two adrenal cortex comparisons, were detected separately. These identified DE-miRNAs were predicted for target genes, thus resulting in 3,959 and 4,010 target genes in pituitary and adrenal cortex, respectively. Further, 105 and 10 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (Fold change > 2 & p-value < 0.05) from those target genes in pituitary and adrenal cortex were obtained separately, in combination with our previous corresponding transcriptome study. Meanwhile, in line with that miRNAs usually negatively regulated their target genes and the dual luciferase reporter assay, we finally identified cfa-miR-205 might play an important role by upregulating MMD in pituitary and hippocampus, thus enhancing the immune response, under chronic stress exposure. Our results shed light on the miRNA expression profiles in the pituitary and adrenal cortex with and without chronic stress exposure, and provide a new insight into miR-205 with its feasible role in regulating chronic stress in the pituitary and hippocampus through targeting MMD.