1
|
Sadat N, Scharfschwerdt M, Ensminger S, Fujita B. Comparison of Two Generations of Self-Expandable Transcatheter Heart Valves in Nine Surgical Valves: An In Vitro Study. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 2024; 11:244. [PMID: 39195152 DOI: 10.3390/jcdd11080244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2024] [Revised: 07/29/2024] [Accepted: 08/03/2024] [Indexed: 08/29/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: This study aimed to analyse the hydrodynamic performance of two generations of self-expanding transcatheter heart valves (THV) as a valve-in-valve (ViV) in different surgical aortic valve (SAV) models under standardised conditions. The nitinol-based Evolut R valve is frequently used in ViV procedures. It is unclear whether its successor, the Evolut PRO, is superior in ViV procedures, particularly considering the previously implanted SAV model. (2) Methods: EvolutTM R 26 mm and EvolutTM PRO 26 mm prostheses were implanted in nine 21 mm labelled size SAV models (Hancock® II, Mosaic® UltraTM, EpicTM Supra, TrifectaTM GT, Perimount®, Perimount® Magna Ease, AvalusTM, IntuityTM, Freestyle®) to analyse their hydrodynamic performance under defined circulatory conditions in a pulse duplicator. (3) Results: Both THVs presented with the lowest effective orifice area (EOA) and highest mean pressure gradient (MPG) inside Hancock® II, whereas THVs in Intuity showed the highest EOA and lowest MPG. Evolut R and Evolut PRO showed significant hydrodynamic differences depending on the SAV. Both THVs performed similarly in porcine valves. Although the Evolut R performed better than Evolut PRO in stented bovine SAVs, the Evolut PRO was superior inside the Intuity. Further, the SAV model design markedly influenced the TAV's geometric orifice area and pin-wheeling index. (4) Conclusions: These findings show that the Evolut R and Evolut PRO perform differently depending on the previously implanted SAV model. THV selection for treatment of a specific SAV model should consider these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Najla Sadat
- Department of Cardiac and Thoracic Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, 23538 Lubeck, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Luebeck, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michael Scharfschwerdt
- Department of Cardiac and Thoracic Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, 23538 Lubeck, Germany
| | - Stephan Ensminger
- Department of Cardiac and Thoracic Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, 23538 Lubeck, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Luebeck, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Buntaro Fujita
- Department of Cardiac and Thoracic Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, 23538 Lubeck, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Luebeck, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chhatriwalla AK, Allen KB, Hu TX, Saxon JT, Huded CP, Hart AJ, Grier EA, Makkar R, Jilaihawi H, Greenbaum AB, Babaliaros VC, Whisenant BK, Yakubov SJ. A Tale of Two Polymers: Bioprosthetic Valve Remodeling Versus Bioprosthetic Valve Fracture of Mosaic Surgical Valves to Facilitate VIV TAVR. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2024; 17:e014276. [PMID: 38946556 DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.124.014276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Adnan K Chhatriwalla
- Division of Cardiology (A.K.C., T.X.H., C.P.H., A.J.H., E.A.G.), Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute and University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine
| | - Keith B Allen
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery (K.B.A.), Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute and University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine
| | - Tom X Hu
- Division of Cardiology (A.K.C., T.X.H., C.P.H., A.J.H., E.A.G.), Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute and University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine
| | - John T Saxon
- University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville (J.T.S.)
| | - Chetan P Huded
- Division of Cardiology (A.K.C., T.X.H., C.P.H., A.J.H., E.A.G.), Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute and University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine
| | - Anthony J Hart
- Division of Cardiology (A.K.C., T.X.H., C.P.H., A.J.H., E.A.G.), Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute and University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine
| | - Elizabeth A Grier
- Division of Cardiology (A.K.C., T.X.H., C.P.H., A.J.H., E.A.G.), Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute and University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine
| | - Raj Makkar
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (R.M., H.J.)
| | - Hasan Jilaihawi
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (R.M., H.J.)
| | - Adam B Greenbaum
- Structural Heart and Valve Center, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA (A.B.G., V.C.B.)
| | - Vasilis C Babaliaros
- Structural Heart and Valve Center, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA (A.B.G., V.C.B.)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bianchini F, Romagnoli E, Aurigemma C, Lombardi M, Graziani F, Iannaccone G, Locorotondo G, Busco M, Malara S, Nesta M, Bruno P, Girlando N, Corrado M, Natale L, Lombardo A, Burzotta F, Trani C. A multimodal approach to predict prosthesis-patient mismatch in patients undergoing valve-in-valve trans-catheter aortic valve implantation. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE 2024:S1553-8389(24)00542-6. [PMID: 38880697 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Revised: 06/05/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
AIMS The valve-in-valve transcatheter-aortic-valve-implantation (VIV-TAVI) represents an emerging procedure for the treatment of degenerated aortic bio-prostheses, and the occurrence of patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) after VIV-TAVI might affect its clinical efficacy. This study aimed to test a multimodal imaging approach to predict PPM risk during the TAVI planning phase and assess its clinical predictivity in VIV-TAVI procedures. METHODS Consecutive patients undergoing VIV-TAVI procedures at our Institution over 6 years were screened and those treated by self-expandable supra-annular valves were selected. The effective orifice area (EOA) was calculated with a hybrid Gorlin equation combining echocardiographic data with invasive hemodynamic assessment. Severe PPM was defined according to such original multimodality assessment as EOAi≤0.65 cm2/m2 (if BMI < 30 kg/m2) or < 0.55 cm2/m2 (if BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and valve-related re-hospitalization during the clinical follow-up. RESULTS A total of 40 VIV-TAVI was included in the analysis. According to the pre-specified multimodal imaging modality assessment, 18 patients (45.0 %) had severe PPM. Among all baseline clinical and anatomical characteristics, estimated glomerular filtration rate before VIV-TAVI (OR 0.872, 95%CI[0.765-0.994],p = 0.040), the echocardiographic pre-procedural ≥moderate AR (OR 0.023, 95%CI[0.001-0.964],p = 0.048), the MSCT-derived effective internal area (OR 0.958, 95%CI[0.919-0.999],p = 0.046) and the implantation depth (OR 2.050, 95%CI[1.028-4.086],p = 0.041) resulted as independent predictors of severe PPM at multivariable logistic analysis. At a mean follow-up of 630 days, patients with severe PPM showed a higher incidence of the primary endpoint (9.1%vs.44.4 %;p = 0.023). CONCLUSION In VIV-TAVI using self-expandable supra-annular valves, a multimodal imaging approach might improve clinical outcome predicting severe PPM occurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Bianchini
- Department of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Romagnoli
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Cristina Aurigemma
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Lombardi
- Department of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Graziani
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Iannaccone
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriella Locorotondo
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Busco
- Department of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Malara
- Department of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Marialisa Nesta
- Department of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Piergiorgio Bruno
- Department of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Nunzio Girlando
- Department of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Corrado
- Department of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Natale
- Department of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonella Lombardo
- Department of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Burzotta
- Department of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
| | - Carlo Trani
- Department of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hashimoto G, Garcia S, Sato H, Fukui M, Hammadah M, Steffen R, Cavalcante JL, Bapat VN. New Insights and Perspective on Bioprosthetic Valve Fracture From Bench Testing and Computed Tomography Analysis. STRUCTURAL HEART : THE JOURNAL OF THE HEART TEAM 2024; 8:100276. [PMID: 38799806 PMCID: PMC11121748 DOI: 10.1016/j.shj.2023.100276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
Background Bioprosthetic valve fracture (BVF) during valve-in-valve TAVR (transcatheter aortic valve replacement) is a procedural adjunct designed to optimize the expansion of the transcatheter heart valve and reduce patient-prosthesis mismatch by using a high-pressure balloon to intentionally fracture the surgical heart valve (SHV). Methods We performed bench testing on 15 bioprosthetic SHV to examine the optimal balloon size and pressure for BVF. We assessed morphological changes and expansion of SHV by computed tomography angiography. Successful BVF was defined as balloon waist disappearance on fluoroscopy and/or sudden pressure drop during balloon inflation. Results Nine valves met the definition of BVF, 3 of which were confirmed by disruption of the stent frame. We classified surgical valves into 3 subsets: 1) fracturable with metal stent frame (MSF), 2) fracturable with polymer stent frame (PSF) and 3) nonfracturable. In general, valves with MSF were fractured using a balloon size = true internal diameter plus 3-5 mm inflated at high pressure (16-20 ATM) whereas valves with PSF could be fractured with a balloon size = true internal diameter plus 3-5 mm and lower balloon pressure (6-14 ATM). Gains in computed tomography angiography derived inflow area after BVF were 12.3% for MSF and 3.6% for PSF SHV. Conclusions Gains in CT-determined valve area after BVF depend on the physical properties of the SHV, which in turn influences pressure thresholds and balloon sizing strategy for optimal BVF. Elastic recoil of PSF valves limits the gains in inflow area after BVF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Go Hashimoto
- Cardiovascular Imaging Research Center and Core Lab, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Santiago Garcia
- Division of Cardiology, The Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Hirotomo Sato
- Valve Science Center, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Miho Fukui
- Cardiovascular Imaging Research Center and Core Lab, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Muhammad Hammadah
- Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Robert Steffen
- Valve Science Center, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Joao L. Cavalcante
- Cardiovascular Imaging Research Center and Core Lab, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- Valve Science Center, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Vinayak N. Bapat
- Valve Science Center, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chhatriwalla AK, Allen KB, Depta JP, Rodriguez E, Thourani VH, Whisenant BK, Zahr F, Bapat V, Garcia S. Outcomes of Bioprosthetic Valve Fracture in Patients Undergoing Valve-in-Valve TAVR. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2023; 16:530-539. [PMID: 36922038 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.12.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Valve-in-valve (VIV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is increasingly used to treat degenerated surgical bioprostheses. Bioprosthetic valve fracture (BVF) has been shown to improve hemodynamic status in VIV TAVR in case series. However, the safety and efficacy of BVF are unknown. OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of VIV TAVR using SAPIEN 3 and SAPIEN 3 Ultra valves with or without BVF using data from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology TVT (Transcatheter Valve Therapy) Registry. METHODS The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included echocardiography-derived valve gradient and aortic valve area. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for baseline characteristics. RESULTS A total of 2,975 patients underwent VIV TAVR from December 15, 2020, to March 31, 2022. BVF was attempted in 619 patients (21%). In adjusted analyses, attempted BVF was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (OR: 2.51; 95% CI: 1.30-4.84) and life-threatening bleeding (OR: 2.55; 95% CI: 1.44-4.50). At discharge, VIV TAVR with attempted BVF was associated with larger aortic valve area (1.6 cm2 vs 1.4 cm2; P < 0.01) and lower mean gradient (16.3 mm Hg vs 19.2 mm Hg; P < 0.01). When BVF was compared with no BVF according to timing (before vs after transcatheter heart valve implantation), BVF after transcatheter heart valve implantation was associated with improved hemodynamic status and similar mortality. CONCLUSIONS BVF as an adjunct to VIV TAVR with the SAPIEN 3 and SAPIEN 3 Ultra valves is associated with a higher risk for in-hospital mortality and significant bleeding and modest improvements in echocardiography-derived hemodynamic status. The timing of BVF is an important determinant of safety and efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adnan K Chhatriwalla
- St. Luke's Mid America Heart Institute and the University of Missouri, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
| | - Keith B Allen
- St. Luke's Mid America Heart Institute and the University of Missouri, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Jeremiah P Depta
- Sands-Constellation Heart Institute/Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | - Firas Zahr
- Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Vinayak Bapat
- Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Saadi RP, Tagliari AP, Polanczyck CA, Ferreira Leal JC, Saadi EK. Balloon Fracturing Valve-in-Valve: How to Do It and a Case Report of TAVR in a Rapid Deployment Prosthesis. J Interv Cardiol 2022; 2022:4368887. [PMID: 35600211 PMCID: PMC9095411 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4368887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) to treat degeneration of bioprosthetic heart valves (BHVs), called as valve-in-valve (ViV), is becoming a key feature since the number of BHVs requiring intervention is increasing and many patients are at high risk for a redo cardiac surgery. However, a TAVR inside a small previous cardiac valve may lead to prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) and not be as effective as we hoped for. An effective option to decrease the chance of PPM is to fracture the previous heart valve implanted using a high-pressure balloon. By performing a valve fracture, the inner valve ring of small BHVs can be opened up by a single fracture line, allowing subsequent implantation of a properly sized transcatheter heart valve, without increasing substantially the procedure risk. In this article, we provide a step-by-step procedure on how to safely and properly fracture a BHV and report a case of a TAVR in a degenerated rapid deployment valve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo Petersen Saadi
- Post Graduate Program in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul., Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Ana Paula Tagliari
- Post Graduate Program in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul. Cardiovascular Surgeon at Hospital São Lucas da PUC-RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Carisi Anne Polanczyck
- Graduate Program in Cardiology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | | | - Eduardo Keller Saadi
- Cariovascular Surgery, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Buono A, Maffeo D, Troise G, Donatelli F, Tespili M, Ielasi A. Trans-Catheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation for the Treatment of Aortic Bioprosthetic Valve Failure. J Clin Med 2022; 11:344. [PMID: 35054038 PMCID: PMC8778204 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11020344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Aortic valve-in-valve (ViV) procedure is a valid treatment option for patients affected by bioprosthetic heart valve (BHV) degeneration. However, ViV implantation is technically more challenging compared to native trans-catheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). A deep knowledge of the mechanism and features of the failed BHV is pivotal to plan an adequate procedure. Multimodal imaging is fundamental in the diagnostic and pre-procedural phases. The main challenges associated with ViV TAVR consist of a higher risk of coronary obstruction, severe post-procedural patient-prosthesis mismatch, and a difficult coronary re-access. In this review, we describe the principles of ViV TAVR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Buono
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, Fondazione Poliambulanza, 25124 Brescia, Italy; (A.B.); (D.M.)
| | - Diego Maffeo
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, Fondazione Poliambulanza, 25124 Brescia, Italy; (A.B.); (D.M.)
| | - Giovanni Troise
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Cardiovascular Department, Hospital Poliambulanza Foundation, 25124 Brescia, Italy;
| | - Francesco Donatelli
- Department of Cardiothoracic Center, Istituto Clinico Sant’Ambrogio, University of Milan, 20149 Milan, Italy;
| | - Maurizio Tespili
- Clinical and Interventional Cardiology Unit, Istituto Clinico Sant’Ambrogio, 20149 Milan, Italy;
| | - Alfonso Ielasi
- Clinical and Interventional Cardiology Unit, Istituto Clinico Sant’Ambrogio, 20149 Milan, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Allen KB, Chhatriwalla AK, Saxon JT, Huded CP, Sathananthan J, Nguyen TC, Whisenant B, Webb JG. Bioprosthetic valve fracture: a practical guide. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 10:564-570. [PMID: 34733685 DOI: 10.21037/acs-2021-tviv-25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (VIV TAVR) is currently indicated for the treatment of failed surgical tissue valves in patients determined to be at high surgical risk for re-operative surgical valve replacement. VIV TAVR, however, often results in suboptimal expansion of the transcatheter heart valve (THV) and can result in patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM), particularly in small surgical valves. Bioprosthetic valve fracture (BVF) and bioprosthetic valve remodeling (BVR) can facilitate VIV TAVR by optimally expanding the THV and reducing the residual transvalvular gradient by utilizing a high-pressure inflation with a non-compliant balloon to either fracture or stretch the surgical valve ring, respectively. This article, along with the supplemental video, will provide patient selection, procedural planning and technical insights for performing BVF and BVR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith B Allen
- Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute and University of Missouri-Kansas, City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Adnan K Chhatriwalla
- Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute and University of Missouri-Kansas, City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - John T Saxon
- Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute and University of Missouri-Kansas, City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Chetan P Huded
- Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute and University of Missouri-Kansas, City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Janarthanan Sathananthan
- Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation and Centre for Heart Valve Innovation, St. Paul's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | | | - John G Webb
- Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation and Centre for Heart Valve Innovation, St. Paul's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tarantini G, Dvir D, Tang G. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in degenerated surgical aortic valves. EUROINTERVENTION 2021; 17:709-719. [PMID: 34665140 PMCID: PMC9725043 DOI: 10.4244/eij-d-21-00157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) within failed bioprosthetic surgical aortic valves (valve-in-valve TAVI) has become an established procedure, currently approved for patients deemed at high risk for repeat aortic valve intervention. Although less invasive than surgical reoperation, challenges of valve-in-valve treatment include higher rates of malposition, prosthesis-patient mismatch and coronary obstruction. Thus, optimal patient selection and preprocedural planning is of the utmost importance to minimise the risk of these complications. In this review article we provide a fully illustrated overview of the most significant periprocedural operative considerations for valve-in-valve TAVI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Tarantini
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Danny Dvir
- Jesselson Integrated Heart Centre, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Gilbert Tang
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wang DD, Geske JB, Choi AD, Lee JC, Khalique OK, Gafoor S, Atianzar K, Blanke P, Little SH, Sorajja P, O’Neill WW, Cavalcante JL. Interventional Imaging for Structural Heart Disease: Challenges and New Frontiers of an Emerging Multi-disciplinary Field. STRUCTURAL HEART 2019. [DOI: 10.1080/24748706.2019.1595238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|