Art and Science in Registry Studies of Anemia and Myocardial Infarction

Impact of the fibrosis-4 index in patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

The fibrosis-4 (FIB4) index, a simple, noninvasive marker used for hepatic diseases, represents adverse outcomes. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether the FIB4 index can predict adverse outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

METHODS

We investigated patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and were alive at discharge. The cut-off FIB4 index at discharge was investigated using the survival classification and regression tree (CART) model to predict adverse outcomes. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Between January 2006 and December 2018, 1354 patients with STEMI (median age, 68 years; men, 76.1%) were investigated. The median value of the FIB4 index was 1.21 (0.84-1.78). The CART model divided the study population into low (FIB4 index <0.945; n = 435), intermediate (0.945 ≤ FIB4 index < 2.185; n = 692), and high (FIB4 index ≥2.185; n = 227) groups based on the significant predictive values for all-cause death. During a median follow-up period of 4.3 years, all-cause death occurred in 208 patients (15.4%). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significant increase in mortality with higher FIB4 index values (log-rank, P < 0.001). The multivariate Cox regression model revealed that the FIB4 index was an independent risk predictor for all-cause death in patients with STEMI [low group as reference vs. intermediate group, hazard ratio: 1.975; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.166-3.346; P = 0.011 and vs. high group, hazard ratio: 4.633; 95% CI: 2.549-8.418; P < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

The FIB4 index was associated with the risk of all-cause mortality in patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI.

Outcomes of anemic patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome: An analysis of the Cooperative National Registry of Acute Coronary Care, Guideline Adherence and Clinical Events

BACKGROUND

Anemia commonly accompanies acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and is associated with poorer outcomes. This study examines the associations between anemia, management and outcomes in an Australian ACS population.

METHODS

This analysis of the CONCORDANCE database included 8665 ACS patients presenting to 41 Australian hospitals. Baseline characteristics, management, and outcomes were compared between patients with anemia (Hb ≤ 130 for males, Hb ≤ 120 g/L for females) and non-anemia.

RESULTS

A total of 1880 (21.7%) patients presenting with ACS were anemic. These patients were older (72 years vs 63 years, P < .0001), with higher prevalence of comorbidities. STEMI patients with anemia were less likely to be emergently reperfused with either thrombolytic therapy (22% vs 33%, P < .0001) or primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (45% vs 51% P = 0.033). For all ACS, anemic patients less frequently received: coronary angiography (63% vs 86%, P < .0001); drug eluting stents if undergoing PCI (50% vs 58%, P < .0001); dual antiplatelet therapy (80% vs 89%, P < .0001) ;and parenteral anticoagulants (82% vs 88%, P < .0001). In hospital complications of heart failure (20% vs 9%, P < .0001), renal failure (13% vs 4%, P < .0001), and re-infarction (4% vs 2%, P = .0006) were more common among anemic patients. There was a near-linear inverse relationship between admission hemoglobin and in hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Anemic patients with ACS are a high risk group less likely to undergo invasive and antithrombotic therapy. Further investigation is required to determine if more active treatment of anemic patients presenting with ACS will improve their outcomes.