1
|
Kleiman NS, Van Mieghem NM, Reardon MJ, Gada H, Mumtaz M, Olsen PS, Heiser J, Merhi W, Chetcuti S, Deeb GM, Chawla A, Kiaii B, Teefy P, Chu MWA, Yakubov SJ, Windecker S, Althouse AD, Baron SJ. Quality of Life 5 Years Following Transfemoral TAVR or SAVR in Intermediate Risk Patients. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2024; 17:979-988. [PMID: 38658126 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) at high risk for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) sustain comparable improvements in health status over 5 years after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or SAVR. Whether a similar long-term benefit is observed among intermediate-risk AS patients is unknown. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to assess health status outcomes through 5 years in intermediate risk patients treated with a self-expanding TAVR prosthesis or SAVR using data from the SURTAVI (Surgical Replacement and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) trial. METHODS Intermediate-risk patients randomized to transfemoral TAVR or SAVR in the SURTAVI trial had disease-specific health status assessed at baseline, 30 days, and annually to 5 years using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). Health status was compared between groups using fixed effects repeated measures modelling. RESULTS Of the 1,584 patients (TAVR, n = 805; SAVR, n = 779) included in the analysis, health status improved more rapidly after TAVR compared with SAVR. However, by 1 year, both groups experienced large health status benefits (mean change in KCCQ-Overall Summary Score (KCCQ-OS) from baseline: TAVR: 20.5 ± 22.4; SAVR: 20.5 ± 22.2). This benefit was sustained, albeit modestly attenuated, at 5 years (mean change in KCCQ-OS from baseline: TAVR: 15.4 ± 25.1; SAVR: 14.3 ± 24.2). There were no significant differences in health status between the cohorts at 1 year or beyond. Similar findings were observed in the KCCQ subscales, although a substantial attenuation of benefit was noted in the physical limitation subscale over time in both groups. CONCLUSIONS In intermediate-risk AS patients, both transfemoral TAVR and SAVR resulted in comparable and durable health status benefits to 5 years. Further research is necessary to elucidate the mechanisms for the small decline in health status noted at 5 years compared with 1 year in both groups. (Safety and Efficacy Study of the Medtronic CoreValve® System in the Treatment of Severe, Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis in Intermediate Risk Subjects Who Need Aortic Valve Replacement [SURTAVI]; NCT01586910).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neal S Kleiman
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
| | | | - Michael J Reardon
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Hemal Gada
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle, Wormleysburg, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mubashir Mumtaz
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle Health, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Peter Skov Olsen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - John Heiser
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Corewell Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
| | - William Merhi
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Corewell Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
| | - Stanley Chetcuti
- Interventional Cardiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - G Michael Deeb
- Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Atul Chawla
- Department of Cardiology, Iowa Heart Center, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
| | - Bob Kiaii
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of California-Davis Health, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Patrick Teefy
- Divisions of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael W A Chu
- Divisions of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven J Yakubov
- Interventional Cardiology, OhioHealth Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Stephan Windecker
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Suzanne J Baron
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Baim Institute for Clinical Research, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Thyregod HGH, Jørgensen TH, Ihlemann N, Steinbrüchel DA, Nissen H, Kjeldsen BJ, Petursson P, De Backer O, Olsen PS, Søndergaard L. Transcatheter or surgical aortic valve implantation: 10-year outcomes of the NOTION trial. Eur Heart J 2024; 45:1116-1124. [PMID: 38321820 PMCID: PMC10984572 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Revised: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become a viable treatment option for patients with severe aortic valve stenosis across a broad range of surgical risk. The Nordic Aortic Valve Intervention (NOTION) trial was the first to randomize patients at lower surgical risk to TAVI or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). The aim of the present study was to report clinical and bioprosthesis outcomes after 10 years. METHODS The NOTION trial randomized 280 patients to TAVI with the self-expanding CoreValve (Medtronic Inc.) bioprosthesis (n = 145) or SAVR with a bioprosthesis (n = 135). The primary composite outcome was the risk of all-cause mortality, stroke, or myocardial infarction. Bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (BVD) was classified as structural valve deterioration (SVD), non-structural valve dysfunction (NSVD), clinical valve thrombosis, or endocarditis according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 criteria. Severe SVD was defined as (i) a transprosthetic gradient of 30 mmHg or more and an increase in transprosthetic gradient of 20 mmHg or more or (ii) severe new intraprosthetic regurgitation. Bioprosthetic valve failure (BVF) was defined as the composite rate of death from a valve-related cause or an unexplained death following the diagnosis of BVD, aortic valve re-intervention, or severe SVD. RESULTS Baseline characteristics were similar between TAVI and SAVR: age 79.2 ± 4.9 years and 79.0 ± 4.7 years (P = .7), male 52.6% and 53.8% (P = .8), and Society of Thoracic Surgeons score < 4% of 83.4% and 80.0% (P = .5), respectively. After 10 years, the risk of the composite outcome all-cause mortality, stroke, or myocardial infarction was 65.5% after TAVI and 65.5% after SAVR [hazard ratio (HR) 1.0; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.7-1.3; P = .9], with no difference for each individual outcome. Severe SVD had occurred in 1.5% and 10.0% (HR 0.2; 95% CI 0.04-0.7; P = .02) after TAVI and SAVR, respectively. The cumulative incidence for severe NSVD was 20.5% and 43.0% (P < .001) and for endocarditis 7.2% and 7.4% (P = 1.0) after TAVI and SAVR, respectively. No patients had clinical valve thrombosis. Bioprosthetic valve failure occurred in 9.7% of TAVI and 13.8% of SAVR patients (HR 0.7; 95% CI 0.4-1.5; P = .4). CONCLUSIONS In patients with severe AS and lower surgical risk randomized to TAVI or SAVR, the risk of major clinical outcomes was not different 10 years after treatment. The risk of severe bioprosthesis SVD was lower after TAVR compared with SAVR, while the risk of BVF was similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Gustav Hørsted Thyregod
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Troels Højsgaard Jørgensen
- Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nikolaj Ihlemann
- Department of Cardiology, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Daniel Andreas Steinbrüchel
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Henrik Nissen
- Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Bo Juel Kjeldsen
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Petur Petursson
- Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Blå Stråket 5, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ole De Backer
- Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Peter Skov Olsen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lars Søndergaard
- Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ikenaga H, Takahashi S, Nakano Y. Contemporary Survival Trends After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. Circ J 2024; 88:472-474. [PMID: 38092411 DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-23-0866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroki Ikenaga
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences
| | - Shinya Takahashi
- Department of Surgery, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences
| | - Yukiko Nakano
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Frank D, Kennon S, Bonaros N, Romano M, Di Mario C, van Ginkel DJ, Bor W, Kasel M, De Backer O, Hachaturyan V, Lüske CM, Kurucova J, Bramlage P, Styra R. Quality of Life Measures in Aortic Stenosis Research: A Narrative Review. Cardiology 2023; 148:556-570. [PMID: 37442111 PMCID: PMC10733944 DOI: 10.1159/000531465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Elderly patients with aortic stenosis (AS) not only have a reduced life expectancy but also a reduced quality of life (QoL). The benefits of an AS intervention may be considered a balance between a good QoL and a reasonably extended life. However, the different questionnaires being used to determine the QoL were generally not developed for the specific situation of patients with AS and come with strengths and considerable weaknesses. The objective of this article was to provide an overview of the available QoL instruments in AS research, describe their strengths and weaknesses, and provide our assessment of the utility of the available scoring instruments for QoL measurements in AS. SUMMARY We identified and reviewed the following instruments that are used in AS research: Short Form Health Survey (SF-36/SF-12), EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), the Illness Intrusiveness Rating Scale (IIRS), the HeartQoL, the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHF), the MacNew Questionnaire, and the Toronto Aortic Stenosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (TASQ). KEY MESSAGES There is no standardized assessment of QoL in patients with AS. Many different questionnaires are being used, but they are rarely specific for AS. There is a need for AS-specific research into the QoL of patients as life prolongation may compete for an improved QoL in this elderly patient group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derk Frank
- Department of Internal Medicine III (Cardiology, Angiology and Critical Care), UKSH University Clinical Center Schleswig-Holstein and DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Kiel, Germany
| | - Simon Kennon
- Department of Cardiology, Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, UK
| | - Nikolaos Bonaros
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Mauro Romano
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Interventional Cardiology, Hôpital Privé Jacques Cartier, Massy, France
| | - Carlo Di Mario
- Structural Interventional Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Dirk-Jan van Ginkel
- Department of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Wilbert Bor
- Department of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Markus Kasel
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ole De Backer
- Interventional Cardiology, The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Claudia M. Lüske
- Institute for Pharmacology and Preventive Medicine, Cloppenburg, Germany
| | | | - Peter Bramlage
- Institute for Pharmacology and Preventive Medicine, Cloppenburg, Germany
| | - Rima Styra
- Department of Psychiatry, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
de Terwangne C, Maes F, Gilard I, Kefer J, Cornette P, Boland B. OLD-TAVR score to predict 2-year mortality in patients aged 75 years and more undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Eur Geriatr Med 2023:10.1007/s41999-023-00794-x. [PMID: 37165292 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-023-00794-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Decision-making on transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients aged 75 years and older is complex. It could be facilitated by the identification of predictors of long-term mortality. This study aimed to identify predictors of 2-year mortality to develop a 2-year mortality risk score. METHODS Cohort study of consecutive patients aged ≥ 75 years who underwent TAVR after a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) at our university hospital between 2012 and 2019. Predictors of 2-year mortality were determined using multivariable Cox regression. A point-based predictive model was developed based on risk factors and subsequently internally validated by fivefold cross-validation. RESULTS The 345 patients (median age 87 years, 54% women) were fit/vulnerable (32%), mildly frail (37%), or moderately/severely frail (31%). The overall 2-year mortality rate was 26%, predicted by atrial fibrillation, hemoglobin ≤ 10 g/dL, age ≥ 87 years, BMI ≤ 24, eGFR ≤ 50 ml/min, and moderate/severe frailty. The risk score (range 0-12), named OLD-TAVR score, for 2-year mortality showed good discriminative power (AUC 0.70) and remained consistent after fivefold cross-validation (cvAUC 0.69). A risk score ≥ 8 (prevalence 20%) predicted a 45% (95%CI: 34-58%) two-year mortality, with high specificity (86%) and good positive predictive power (+ LR 2.43). CONCLUSION A 2-year mortality risk score (OLD-TAVR score) for very old patients undergoing TAVR was developed based on six bio-clinical items. A score ≥ 8 identified patients in whom 2-year mortality was very high and thereby the TAVR futile. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE OF REGISTRATION Study protocol B403, 26/09/2022, retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christophe de Terwangne
- Geriatric Medicine, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc - Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Frédéric Maes
- Division of Cardiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium
- Pôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Gilard
- Geriatric Medicine, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc - Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Joëlle Kefer
- Division of Cardiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium
- Pôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Pascale Cornette
- Geriatric Medicine, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc - Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
- Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Benoit Boland
- Geriatric Medicine, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc - Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
- Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
O'Hair D, Yakubov SJ, Grubb KJ, Oh JK, Ito S, Deeb GM, Van Mieghem NM, Adams DH, Bajwa T, Kleiman NS, Chetcuti S, Søndergaard L, Gada H, Mumtaz M, Heiser J, Merhi WM, Petrossian G, Robinson N, Tang GHL, Rovin JD, Little SH, Jain R, Verdoliva S, Hanson T, Li S, Popma JJ, Reardon MJ. Structural Valve Deterioration After Self-Expanding Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients at Intermediate or High Risk. JAMA Cardiol 2023; 8:111-119. [PMID: 36515976 PMCID: PMC9857153 DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.4627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Importance The frequency and clinical importance of structural valve deterioration (SVD) in patients undergoing self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) or surgery is poorly understood. Objective To evaluate the 5-year incidence, clinical outcomes, and predictors of hemodynamic SVD in patients undergoing self-expanding TAVI or surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants This post hoc analysis pooled data from the CoreValve US High Risk Pivotal (n = 615) and SURTAVI (n = 1484) randomized clinical trials (RCTs); it was supplemented by the CoreValve Extreme Risk Pivotal trial (n = 485) and CoreValve Continued Access Study (n = 2178). Patients with severe aortic valve stenosis deemed to be at intermediate or increased risk of 30-day surgical mortality were included. Data were collected from December 2010 to June 2016, and data were analyzed from December 2021 to October 2022. Interventions Patients were randomized to self-expanding TAVI or surgery in the RCTs or underwent self-expanding TAVI for clinical indications in the nonrandomized studies. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was the incidence of SVD through 5 years (from the RCTs). Factors associated with SVD and its association with clinical outcomes were evaluated for the pooled RCT and non-RCT population. SVD was defined as (1) an increase in mean gradient of 10 mm Hg or greater from discharge or at 30 days to last echocardiography with a final mean gradient of 20 mm Hg or greater or (2) new-onset moderate or severe intraprosthetic aortic regurgitation or an increase of 1 grade or more. Results Of 4762 included patients, 2605 (54.7%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 82.1 (7.4) years. A total of 2099 RCT patients, including 1128 who received TAVI and 971 who received surgery, and 2663 non-RCT patients who received TAVI were included. The cumulative incidence of SVD treating death as a competing risk was lower in patients undergoing TAVI than surgery (TAVI, 2.20%; surgery, 4.38%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.27-0.78; P = .004). This lower risk was most pronounced in patients with smaller annuli (23 mm diameter or smaller; TAVI, 1.32%; surgery, 5.84%; HR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06-0.73; P = .02). SVD was associated with increased 5-year all-cause mortality (HR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.46-2.82; P < .001), cardiovascular mortality (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.20-2.90; P = .006), and valve disease or worsening heart failure hospitalizations (HR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.23-3.84; P = .008). Predictors of SVD were developed from multivariate analysis. Conclusions and Relevance This study found a lower rate of SVD in patients undergoing self-expanding TAVI vs surgery at 5 years. Doppler echocardiography was a valuable tool to detect SVD, which was associated with worse clinical outcomes. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT01240902, NCT01586910, and NCT01531374.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel O'Hair
- Cardiovascular Service Line, Boulder Community Health, Boulder, Colorado
| | - Steven J Yakubov
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Ohio Health Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus
| | - Kendra J Grubb
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jae K Oh
- Echocardiography Core Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Saki Ito
- Echocardiography Core Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - G Michael Deeb
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor.,Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor
| | - Nicolas M Van Mieghem
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - David H Adams
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York
| | - Tanvir Bajwa
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Neal S Kleiman
- Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Stanley Chetcuti
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor.,Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor
| | - Lars Søndergaard
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hemal Gada
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle Health, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle Health, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
| | - Mubashir Mumtaz
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle Health, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle Health, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
| | - John Heiser
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan.,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan
| | - William M Merhi
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan.,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan
| | - George Petrossian
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Saint Francis Hospital, Roslyn, New York
| | - Newell Robinson
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Saint Francis Hospital, Roslyn, New York
| | - Gilbert H L Tang
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York
| | - Joshua D Rovin
- Center for Advanced Valve and Structural Heart Care, Morton Plant Hospital, Clearwater, Florida
| | - Stephen H Little
- Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Renuka Jain
- Aurora Cardiovascular Services, Aurora-St. Luke's Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Sarah Verdoliva
- Structural Heart and Aortic, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Tim Hanson
- Structural Heart and Aortic, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Shuzhen Li
- Structural Heart and Aortic, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Jeffrey J Popma
- Structural Heart and Aortic, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Michael J Reardon
- Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Forrest JK, Deeb GM, Yakubov SJ, Rovin JD, Mumtaz M, Gada H, O'Hair D, Bajwa T, Sorajja P, Heiser JC, Merhi W, Mangi A, Spriggs DJ, Kleiman NS, Chetcuti SJ, Teirstein PS, Zorn GL, Tadros P, Tchétché D, Resar JR, Walton A, Gleason TG, Ramlawi B, Iskander A, Caputo R, Oh JK, Huang J, Reardon MJ. 2-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022; 79:882-896. [PMID: 35241222 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.11.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Evolut Low Risk Trial (Medtronic Evolut Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low Risk Patients) showed that transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a supra-annular, self-expanding valve was noninferior to surgery for the primary endpoint of all-cause mortality or disabling stroke at 2 years. This finding was based on a Bayesian analysis performed after 850 patients had reached 1 year of follow-up. OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to report the full 2-year clinical and echocardiographic outcomes for patients enrolled in the Evolut Low Risk Trial. METHODS A total of 1,414 low-surgical risk patients with severe aortic stenosis were randomized to receive TAVR or surgical AVR. An independent clinical events committee adjudicated adverse events, and a central echocardiographic core laboratory assessed hemodynamic endpoints. RESULTS An attempted implant was performed in 730 TAVR and 684 surgical patients from March 2016 to May 2019. The Kaplan-Meier rates for the complete 2-year primary endpoint of death or disabling stroke were 4.3% in the TAVR group and 6.3% in the surgery group (P = 0.084). These rates were comparable to the interim Bayesian rates of 5.3% with TAVR and 6.7% with surgery (difference: -1.4%; 95% Bayesian credible interval: -4.9% to 2.1%). All-cause mortality rates were 3.5% vs 4.4% (P = 0.366), and disabling stroke rates were 1.5% vs 2.7% (P = 0.119), respectively. Between years 1 and 2, there was no convergence of the primary outcome curves. CONCLUSIONS The complete 2-year follow-up from the Evolut Low Risk Trial found that TAVR is noninferior to surgery for the primary endpoint of all-cause mortality or disabling stroke, with event rates that were slightly better than those predicted by using the Bayesian analysis. (Medtronic Evolut Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low Risk Patients [Evolut Low Risk Trial]; NCT02701283).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John K Forrest
- Department of Internal Medicine (Cardiology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; Department of Surgery (Cardiac Surgery), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
| | - G Michael Deeb
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Steven J Yakubov
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Riverside Methodist-OhioHealth, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Joshua D Rovin
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Morton Plant Hospital, Clearwater, Florida, USA
| | - Mubashir Mumtaz
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle, Wormleyburg, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle, Wormleyburg, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Hemal Gada
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle, Wormleyburg, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle, Wormleyburg, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Daniel O'Hair
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Tanvir Bajwa
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Paul Sorajja
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Minneapolis Heart Institute-Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - John C Heiser
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
| | - William Merhi
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
| | - Abeel Mangi
- Department of Internal Medicine (Cardiology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; Department of Surgery (Cardiac Surgery), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Douglas J Spriggs
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Morton Plant Hospital, Clearwater, Florida, USA
| | - Neal S Kleiman
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Houston Methodist-DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas, USA; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Houston Methodist-DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Stanley J Chetcuti
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Paul S Teirstein
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - George L Zorn
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, USA; Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Peter Tadros
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, USA; Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Didier Tchétché
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| | - Jon R Resar
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Antony Walton
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Thomas G Gleason
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Basel Ramlawi
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Valley Health System, Winchester, Virginia, USA
| | - Ayman Iskander
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Saint Joseph's Hospital Health Center, Syracuse, New York, USA; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Saint Joseph's Hospital Health Center, Syracuse, New York, USA
| | - Ronald Caputo
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Saint Joseph's Hospital Health Center, Syracuse, New York, USA; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Saint Joseph's Hospital Health Center, Syracuse, New York, USA
| | - Jae K Oh
- Division of Cardiovascular Ultrasound, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jian Huang
- Department of Statistics, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Michael J Reardon
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Houston Methodist-DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas, USA; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Houston Methodist-DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|