Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cardiovascular outcomes in women: results from the women's health initiative

Cardio-rheumatology: the cardiovascular, pharmacological, and surgical risks associated with rheumatological diseases in women

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the number one cause of death worldwide. Women are at increased risk of death from CVD, but the mechanisms for how and why this occurs remain elusive. One subset of women who are exceptionally vulnerable to CVD are those with rheumatic diseases (RDs). Indeed, women account for 80% of all RDs, disorders that encompass a broad range of autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases that lead to chronic inflammation and pathology. The clear association of increased CVD risk in women with RD is thought to be mediated by a number of factors, including RD pathology itself, pharmacological induction of CVD, and/or as yet unidentified mechanisms. As such, elucidation of the causes and treatments of these pathologies has given rise to a new subspecialty of cardiology: cardio-rheumatology. Here, we review and discuss the CVD risks in patients with RDs, the associated sex disparities in RD and CVD care, as well as the current therapeutic and interventional options available to specifically help women with RDs. We hope this discussion will provide guidance and support to patients, as well as to cardio-rheumatologists, as these groups are the most uniquely positioned to radically improve CVD care in these individuals. Moreover, we are hopeful this discussion may lead to better, more efficacious approaches to treating these disorders in women in the near future.

Cardio-Oncology Drug Interactions: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

In the cardio-oncology population, drug interactions are of particular importance given the complex pharmacological profile, narrow therapeutic index, and inherent risk of therapies used to manage cardiovascular disease and cancer. Drug interactions may be beneficial or detrimental to the desired therapeutic effect. Clinicians in both cardiology and oncology should be cognizant of these potential drug-drug interactions that may reduce the efficacy or safety of either cardiovascular or cancer therapies. These risks can be mitigated through increased recognition of potential drug-drug interaction, use of alternative medications when possible, and careful monitoring. This scientific statement provides clinicians with an overview of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions in patients with cancer exposed to common cardiovascular and cancer medications.

Efficacy of acetaminophen versus ibuprofen for the management of rotator cuff-related shoulder pain: Randomized open-label study

Background

Shoulder pain related to the rotator cuff (RC) is one of the most common and bothersome musculoskeletal complaints. Pharmacologic treatment most often includes acetaminophen and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as ibuprofen. However, data allowing comparison of the efficacy of these two drugs are very limited. We compared the therapeutic outcomes of acetaminophen and ibuprofen in the management of RC-related pain.

Methods

This was an open-label, two-center, active-control, prospective randomized clinical trial. Participants were assigned randomly to acetaminophen or ibuprofen treatment groups. The acetaminophen dose was 500 mg every 6–8 h, and it was 400–800 mg every 6–8 h for ibuprofen. The impact of the treatment was measured by Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick-DASH) and World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaires at baseline and after 6 weeks of therapy.

Results

Thirty-three patients completed the study; 20 treated with ibuprofen and 13 with acetaminophen. Patients in both groups were comparable at baseline with regard to SPADI, Quick-DASH, and WHOQOL-BREF scores. After 6 weeks of treatment, patients receiving ibuprofen, but not acetaminophen, reported an improvement in pain severity and functional activity (as measured by SPADI and Quick-DASH). Patients taking acetaminophen, but not ibuprofen, reported improvement in the physical and environmental domains of WHOQOL-BREF scores.

Conclusions

Ibuprofen and acetaminophen provide benefits to patients suffering from RC-related pain. However, the type of improvement perceived by patients differed between these two medications.

Cardiovascular Risk of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Classical and Selective Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors: A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies

The purpose of this study was to review the published evidence on the clinical use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and to assess the cardiovascular risk (CVR) of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors (coxibs), excluding aspirin, by means of a meta-analytic procedure. A search was conducted on MEDLINE and EMBASE databases between October 1999 and June 2018. Cohort and case-control studies showing CVR as relative risk (RR), odds ratio, hazard ratio, or incidence rate ratio associated with NSAIDs versus no treatment were selected. We estimated the pooled RR and the 95% confidence interval (CI) for all NSAIDs as a whole and individually. Eighty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall, NSAIDs were found to be associated with a statistically significantly increased CVR (RR, 1.24 [95%CI, 1.19-1.28]). The risk was slightly higher for coxibs (RR, 1.22 [95%CI, 1.17-1.28]) as compared with nonselective NSAIDs (RR, 1.18 [95%CI, 1.12-1.24]). Data analysis by drug disclosed that rofecoxib (RR, 1.39 [95%CI, 1.31-1.47]), followed by diclofenac (RR, 1.34 [95%CI, 1.26-1.42]) and etoricoxib (RR, 1.27 [95%CI, 1.12-1.43]) were the NSAIDs associated with the highest CVR. Analysis by type of event showed that the highest risk corresponded to vascular events for both coxibs (RR, 2.18 [95%CI, 1.72-2.78]) and nonselective NSAIDs (RR, 2.46 [95%CI, 2.00-3.02]). The meta-analysis results suggest that the use of the marketed coxibs celecoxib and etoricoxib would be related to a statistically significant CVR increase. Etoricoxib CVR could be higher than that for celecoxib. This increment would be similar to classical NSAID CVR.

The association between an inflammatory diet and global cognitive function and incident dementia in older women: The Women's Health Initiative Memory Study

INTRODUCTION

The Mediterranean and Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension diets have been associated with lower dementia risk. We evaluated dietary inflammatory potential in relation to mild cognitive impairment (MCI)/dementia risk.

METHODS

Baseline food frequency questionnaires from n = 7085 women (aged 65-79 years) were used to calculate Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) scores that were categorized into four groups. Cognitive function was evaluated annually, and MCI and all-cause dementia cases were adjudicated centrally. Mixed effect models evaluated cognitive decline on over time; Cox models evaluated the risk of MCI or dementia across DII groups.

RESULTS

Over an average of 9.7 years, there were 1081 incident cases of cognitive impairment. Higher DII scores were associated with greater cognitive decline and earlier onset of cognitive impairment. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) comparing lower (anti-inflammatory; group 1 referent) DII scores to the higher scores were group 2-HR: 1.01 (0.86-1.20); group 3-HR: 0.99 (0.82-1.18); and group 4-HR: 1.27 (1.06-1.52).

CONCLUSIONS

Diets with the highest pro-inflammatory potential were associated with higher risk of MCI or dementia.

Interaction between Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Low-fat Dietary Intervention on Colorectal Cancer Incidence; the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Dietary Modification Trial

BACKGROUND

The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Dietary Modification (DM) trial did not show that reductions in dietary fat accompanied by increases in vegetable and fruit consumption decrease the incidence of colorectal cancer. Secondary analyses suggested that aspirin use may modify the intervention effects of DM on colorectal cancer development, although a recent reanalysis including the postintervention period confirmed no main effect of the intervention on reducing colorectal cancer incidence Methods: We analyzed data from 48,834 postmenopausal women who were randomized into the low-fat DM (N = 19,540) or comparison (N = 29,294) group for an average 8.1 years and followed for an additional 9.4 years through August 31, 2014. Exposure to specific class(es) or strength(s) of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) was modeled at baseline and as time-dependent use through the 9-year clinic visit. A Cox proportional hazard model was employed to assess the association of the DM, medication use, and their interaction with colorectal cancer events.

RESULTS

A total of 906 incident cases of colorectal cancer were identified during the intervention and postintervention periods. By both exposure models, we found that colorectal cancer incidence was not different in the DM from the comparison group among any type of NSAID users. None of the interactions with any category of NSAID use was statistically significant; however there was most modest evidence for an interaction (p = 0.07) with aspirin use at baseline (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-1.11 for users; HR = 1.12, 95% CI, 0.97-1.30 for nonusers). Strength and duration of aspirin use at baseline did not alter the associations.

CONCLUSION

Extended follow-up of women in the WHI DM trial did not confirm combined protective effects of aspirin and low-fat diet on colorectal cancer risk among the postmenopausal women.

Effects of Oxidative Stress and Testosterone on Pro-Inflammatory Signaling in a Female Rat Dopaminergic Neuronal Cell Line

Parkinson's disease, a progressive neurodegenerative disorder, is associated with oxidative stress and neuroinflammation. These pathological markers can contribute to the loss of dopamine neurons in the midbrain. Interestingly, men have a 2-fold increased incidence for Parkinson's disease than women. Although the mechanisms underlying this sex difference remain elusive, we propose that the primary male sex hormone, testosterone, is involved. Our previous studies show that testosterone, through a putative membrane androgen receptor, can increase oxidative stress-induced neurotoxicity in dopamine neurons. Based on these results, this study examines the role of nuclear factor κ B (NF-κB), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2), and apoptosis in the deleterious effects of androgens in an oxidative stress environment. We hypothesize, under oxidative stress environment, testosterone via a putative membrane androgen receptor will exacerbate oxidative stress-induced NF-κB/COX2 signaling in N27 dopaminergic neurons, leading to apoptosis. Our data show that testosterone increased the expression of COX2 and apoptosis in dopamine neurons. Inhibiting the NF-κB and COX2 pathway with CAPE and ibuprofen, respectively, blocked testosterone's negative effects on cell viability, indicating that NF-κB/COX2 cascade plays a role in the negative interaction between testosterone and oxidative stress on neuroinflammation. These data further support the role of testosterone mediating the loss of dopamine neurons under oxidative stress conditions, which may be a key mechanism contributing to the increased incidence of Parkinson's disease in men compared with women.

FDA labeling of NSAIDs: Review of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in cardiovascular disease

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been extensively used worldwide for both chronic and acute musculoskeletal and inflammatory conditions. Extensive evidence has linked NSAID use with adverse cardiovascular events. This review article aims to review the existing evidence on the risk of cardiovascular and coronary events in both selective and nonselective NSAIDs, the time course of NSAIDs associated with cardiovascular risk, and specific populations that may be at increased risk.

A Nonselective Cyclooxygenase Inhibitor Enhances the Activity of Vinblastine in a Naturally-Occurring Canine Model of Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma

Background: Chemotherapy is expected to remain an important part of invasive urothelial carcinoma (UC) treatment. Strategies to enhance chemotherapy efficacy are needed.

Objective: To determine the chemotherapy-enhancing effects of a nonselective cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitor on vinblastine in a naturally-occurring canine model of invasive UC.

Methods: With IACUC approval, privately-owned dogs with naturally-occurring histologically-diagnosed invasive UC, expected survival ≥6 weeks, and informed owner consent were randomly allocated to receive vinblastine (2.5 mg/m² intravenously every 2 weeks) plus piroxicam (0.3 mg/kg daily per os) or vinblastine alone (same dose) with the option to receive piroxicam alone when vinblastine failed. Scheduled evaluations included physical exam, standard laboratory analyses, thoracic radiography, abdominal ultrasonography, and standardized measurement of urinary tract tumors.

Results: Dogs receiving vinblastine alone (n = 27) and vinblastine-piroxicam (n = 24) were similar in age, sex, breed, tumor stage, and grade. Remission occurred more frequently (P <  0.02) with vinblastine-piroxicam (58.3%) than with vinblastine alone (22.2%). The median progression free interval was 143 days with vinblastine alone and 199 days with the combination. Interestingly, the overall median survival time was significantly longer (P <  0.03) in dogs receiving vinblastine alone followed by piroxicam alone (n = 20, 531 days) than in dogs receiving the combination (299 days). Treatment was well tolerated in both arms.

Conclusions: Piroxicam significantly enhanced the activity of vinblastine in dogs with UC where the cancer closely mimics the human condition, clearly justifying further study. The study suggest the potential importance of tracking COX inhibitor use in patients in clinical trials as COX inhibitors could affect treatment response.

Elevation of cardiovascular risk by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are one of the most frequently used medications. NSAIDs profoundly modify prostaglandin homeostasis through inhibition of the enzyme, cyclooxygenase (COX), especially COX-2. COX-2 inhibition is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes as demonstrated by recent trials using this type of drug. This review explores the latest available data, including recent, randomized, clinical trials, controversies, and pathophysiology of the adverse effects of COX-inhibition.

One-year safety of ibuprofen/famotidine fixed combination versus ibuprofen alone: pooled analyses of two 24-week randomized, double-blind trials and a follow-on extension

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety of the fixed combination of ibuprofen and famotidine compared with ibuprofen alone from two 24-week, multicenter, double-blind trials designed to evaluate the comparative incidence of endoscopically documented upper gastrointestinal ulcers and a 28-week double-blind extension study.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Safety was analyzed by pooling data from the two double-blind trials and the follow-on study. Safety was assessed by monitoring the incidence, causality, and severity of adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

In the pivotal efficacy and safety trials, discontinuation rates due to any cause and dyspepsia were significantly lower for the ibuprofen/famotidine combination versus ibuprofen alone. Other than dyspepsia, gastrointestinal and cardiovascular AEs of special interest were similar. Events judged to be treatment related were significantly lower with the ibuprofen/famotidine combination (20.6% vs. 25%). In the safety extension population, there were no differences in the discontinuation rates and the reporting of AEs or serious AEs (SAEs) between the two groups. Gastrointestinal-related events were similar between the groups. Incidence of cardiovascular-related AEs of special interest were 11% (ibuprofen/famotidine) and 2% (ibuprofen) (p=0.06), possibly due to a higher number of rheumatoid arthritis patients in the combination group. Of these, 80% were reports of hypertension (8% ibuprofen/famotidine vs. 2% ibuprofen). Three cases of hypertension in the ibuprofen/famotidine group were considered treatment related. The probability of a cardiovascular event decreased during days 112-167 of treatment and remained low with continued treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

One-year safety data from two pivotal trials and a long-term extension study indicate that the ibuprofen/famotidine combination demonstrates a favorable gastrointestinal safety profile and more patients continued on therapy compared to ibuprofen alone. No new safety signals have been identified. These data offer additional evidence supporting a new therapeutic option to improve gastrointestinal safety and adherence for patients who require long-term ibuprofen.

Aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and the risk of Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND

The use of aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may decrease the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma; however, it is unknown where these agents may act in the proposed pathway from normal mucosa to Barrett's esophagus to esophageal adenocarcinoma.

AIM

The aim of the study was to evaluate the association between aspirin and NSAID use and Barrett's esophagus in a case-control study within a large community-based population.

METHODS

We conducted a case-control study of aspirin/NSAID use and Barrett's esophagus within the Kaiser Permanente Northern California population. Cases had a new diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus between October 2002 and September 2005; controls were members without a diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus.

RESULTS

Persons with Barrett's esophagus were less likely to use aspirin than population controls [odds ratio (OR) 0.59, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.39-0.87]; a stronger association was found among cases and controls with reflux symptoms (OR 0.49, 95 % CI 0.32-0.75; p value interaction = 0.004). Similar associations were found with the use of either aspirin and/or non-aspirin NSAIDs (OR 0.53, 95 % CI 0.35-0.81), although NSAID use alone was not significantly associated with Barrett's esophagus (OR 0.74, 95 % CI 0.47-1.16). The strength of the association was highest among persons with at least moderate-to-high total medication intake.

CONCLUSIONS

Regular use of aspirin or NSAIDs was associated with a decreased risk of Barrett's esophagus, particularly among persons with gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms. These findings have implications for chemoprevention, as some of the previously described protective association between aspirin/NSAIDs and esophageal adenocarcinoma may be explained by events that occur prior to the development of Barrett's esophagus.

Myocardial Infarction and Stroke Risk in Young Healthy Men Treated with Injectable Testosterone

This study was conducted to examine the association between testosterone therapy and new myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke events in a series of patients treated at Low T Centers across the United States, consisting of mainly young (mean age = 46), otherwise, healthy men. Electronic medical records were queried between the years 2009 and 2014 to identify patients diagnosed with hypogonadism, MI, and stroke, as indicated by ICD-9 codes. The incidence of MI and stroke events was compared to community-based registries. 39,936 patients recruited from 40 Low T Centers across the United States were treated and 19,968 met eligibility criteria for receiving testosterone treatment. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) for MI in testosterone- (T-) treated versus nontreated patients was 0.14 (C.I. = 0.08 to 0.18, P < 0.0001) whereas the IRR for stroke for T-treated versus nontreated patients was 0.11 (C.I. = 0.02 to 0.13, P < 0.0001). There was no evidence of worsening preexisting MI or stroke in patients treated with testosterone. The experience in Low T Centers shows that, in an injectable testosterone patient registry, testosterone is generally safe for younger men who do not have significant risk factors. Of patients that developed MI with testosterone, there was no association with testosterone or hematocrit levels.