The ISCHEMIA Trial Meets the Rashomon Effect: Lessons for Clinical Practice

Precision epigenetics provides a scalable pathway for improving coronary heart disease care globally

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the world's leading cause of death. Up to 90% of all CHD deaths are preventable, but effective prevention of this mortality requires more scalable, precise methods for assessing CHD status and monitoring treatment response. Unfortunately, current diagnostic methods have barriers to implementation, particularly in rural areas and lower-income countries. This gap may be bridged by highly scalable advances in DNA methylation testing methods and artificial intelligence. Herein, we review prior studies of CHD related to methylation alone and in combination with other biovariables. We compare these new methods with established methods for diagnosing CHD. Finally, we outline pathways through which methylation-based testing methods may allow the democratization of improved methods for assessing CHD globally.

Coronary Revascularization and Long-Term Survivorship in Chronic Coronary Syndrome

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) persists as the leading cause of death in the Western world. In recent decades, great headway has been made in reducing mortality due to IHD, based around secondary prevention. The advent of coronary revascularization techniques, first coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery in the 1960s and then percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the 1970s, has represented one of the major breakthroughs in medicine during the last century. The benefit provided by these techniques, especially PCI, has been crucial in lowering mortality rates in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, in the setting where IHD is most prevalent, namely chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), the increase in life expectancy provided by coronary revascularization is controversial. Over more than 40 years, several clinical trials have been carried out comparing optimal medical treatment (OMT) alone with a strategy of routine coronary revascularization on top of OMT. Beyond a certain degree of symptomatic improvement and lower incidence of minor events, routine invasive management has not demonstrated a convincing effect in terms of reducing mortality in CCS. Based on the accumulated evidence more than half a century after the first revascularization procedures were used, invasive management should be considered in those patients with uncontrolled symptoms despite OMT or high-risk features related to left ventricular function, coronary anatomy, or functional assessment, taking into account the patient expectations and preferences.