15-Deoxy-Δ12,14-Prostaglandin J 2 Reinforces the Anti-Inflammatory Capacity of Endothelial Cells With a Genetically Determined NO Deficit

Prostaglandin 15d-PGJ2 inhibits proliferation of lung adenocarcinoma cells by inducing ROS production and activation of apoptosis via sirtuin-1

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUADC) belongs to the most prevalent and lethal cancer types. As 15-deoxy-Δ12,14-prostaglandin J2 (15d-PGJ2) displays anti-oxidative, -inflammatory, and -cancer properties, we investigated whether this cyclopentenone PG, a stable degradation end-product of cyclooxygenase-generated PGD2, exerts beneficial effects in three LUADC cell lines (A549, H1299, H23). We here report that 15d-PGJ2 had substantial cytotoxic effects in all three LUADC cell lines by promoting early apoptosis and inhibiting the cell cycle, proliferation, and migration. As indicators of cell malignancy, scratch closure and colony formation were significantly inhibited by 15d-PGJ2. 15d-PGJ2 induced generation of ROS and subsequent activation of MAPKs. Expression of Nrf-2, a well-known tumor driver, was markedly diminished by 15d-PGJ2 treatment. Although PPARγ, DP1, and DP2 are expressed in LUADC cells, blocking these receptors with specific inhibitors (SR16832 and BW245C) did not reverse 15d-PGJ2-mediated cytotoxicity, suggesting receptor-independent effects. 15d-PGJ2 decreased SIRT1 expression in LUADC cells and the knockdown of SIRT1 diminished the cytotoxic effects of 15d-PGJ2. Importantly, 15d-PGJ2 significantly reduced tumor growth using the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay. The structural analog of 15d- PGJ2, 9,10-dihydro-15d-PGJ2 (lacking the α,β-unsaturated ketone structural element), did not show any toxic effects in LUADC cells. Altogether, our findings suggest that 15d-PGJ2 led to significantly reduced tumor growth and cell proliferation in three LUADC cell lines. The CAM assay results suggest that 15d-PGJ2 is a suitable endogenous compound to interfere with LUADC tumor progression. We show that SIRT1 modulates the effects of 15d-PGJ2 and may be used as a therapeutic target for LUADC.

Biochemical and Structural Characteristics, Gene Regulation, Physiological, Pathological and Clinical Features of Lipocalin-Type Prostaglandin D2 Synthase as a Multifunctional Lipocalin

Lipocalin-type prostaglandin (PG) D₂ synthase (L-PGDS) catalyzes the isomerization of PGH₂, a common precursor of the two series of PGs, to produce PGD₂. PGD₂ stimulates three distinct types of G protein-coupled receptors: (1) D type of prostanoid (DP) receptors involved in the regulation of sleep, pain, food intake, and others; (2) chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on T helper type 2 cells (CRTH2) receptors, in myelination of peripheral nervous system, adipocyte differentiation, inhibition of hair follicle neogenesis, and others; and (3) F type of prostanoid (FP) receptors, in dexamethasone-induced cardioprotection. L-PGDS is the same protein as β-trace, a major protein in human cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). L-PGDS exists in the central nervous system and male genital organs of various mammals, and human heart; and is secreted into the CSF, seminal plasma, and plasma, respectively. L-PGDS binds retinoic acids and retinal with high affinities (Kd < 100 nM) and diverse small lipophilic substances, such as thyroids, gangliosides, bilirubin and biliverdin, heme, NAD(P)H, and PGD₂, acting as an extracellular carrier of these substances. L-PGDS also binds amyloid β peptides, prevents their fibril formation, and disaggregates amyloid β fibrils, acting as a major amyloid β chaperone in human CSF. Here, I summarize the recent progress of the research on PGD₂ and L-PGDS, in terms of its “molecular properties,” “cell culture studies,” “animal experiments,” and “clinical studies,” all of which should help to understand the pathophysiological role of L-PGDS and inspire the future research of this multifunctional lipocalin.

Intranasal 15d-PGJ2 ameliorates brain glucose hypometabolism via PPARγ-dependent activation of PGC-1α/GLUT4 signalling in APP/PS1 transgenic mice

Targeting the common molecular mechanism of type 2 diabetes mellitus and Alzheimer's disease (AD), including dysregulation of glucose metabolism, insulin resistance, and neuroinflammation, might be an efficient treatment strategy for AD. Previous studies have shown that 15-deoxy-Δ12,14-prostaglandin J2 (15d-PGJ2), an endogenous PPARγ agonist, has anti-inflammatory, insulin sensitizing and anti-diabetic effects. However, whether 15d-PGJ2 has beneficial effects on AD remains to be elucidated. In the present study, we found that intranasal administration of 15d-PGJ2 (300 ng/30 μL/day) for 3 months significantly inhibited Aβ plaques, suppressed neuroinflammation, and attenuated cognitive deficits in APP/PS1 transgenic mice. Interestingly, 15d-PGJ2 treatment could increase brain glucose uptake, as detected by ¹⁸F-FDG microPET imaging, and co-localization of GLUT4 and NeuN in the hippocampus of APP/PS1 mice. Furthermore, 15d-PGJ2 markedly increased the expression of PPARγ and PGC-1α, upregulated GLUT4, and decreased the phosphorylation of IRS-1 (Ser616) in the hippocampus of APP/PS1 mice. Importantly, co-administration of a PPARγ antagonist GW9662 abrogated these protective effects of 15d-PGJ2. Collectively, intranasal 15d-PGJ2 conferred protective effects against AD by activating PPARγ-dependent PGC-1α/GLUT4 signalling. The PPARγ agonist 15d-PGJ2 might be a potential therapeutic drug for AD.

Role of oxylipins generated from dietary PUFAs in the modulation of endothelial cell function

Oxylipins, which are circulating bioactive lipids generated from polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) by cyclooxygenase, lipooxygenase and cytochrome P450 enzymes, have diverse effects on endothelial cells. Although studies of the effects of oxylipins on endothelial cell function are accumulating, a review that provides a comprehensive compilation of current knowledge and recent advances in the context of vascular homeostasis is lacking. This is the first compilation of the various in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo reports to examine the effects and potential mechanisms of action of oxylipins on endothelial cells. The aggregate data indicate docosahexaenoic acid-derived oxylipins consistently show beneficial effects related to key endothelial cell functions, whereas oxylipins derived from other PUFAs exhibit both positive and negative effects. Furthermore, information is lacking for certain oxylipin classes, such as those derived from α-linolenic acid, which suggests additional studies are required to achieve a full understanding of how oxylipins affect endothelial cells.