Percutaneous Device Closure of Paravalvular Leak: Combined Experience From the United Kingdom and Ireland

Comprehensive Guide to Paravalvular Leak: Symptoms, Effects, and Treatments

Paravalvular leak (PVL) represents a common complication often encountered following valve replacement surgeries, posing significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges within the field of cardiology. The condition, characterized by an abnormal flow of blood around the edges of a prosthetic valve, can lead to a spectrum of clinical manifestations, from asymptomatic states to severe heart failure or hemolysis. Its relevance is underscored by its contribution to morbidity and mortality among affected individuals, necessitating a deeper understanding of its etiology, diagnosis, and management. The exploration of advanced diagnostic tools, such as echocardiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance, alongside novel treatment approaches, underscores the dynamic and evolving landscape of PVL management. This is a concentrated guide to understand the various aspects related to PVL, starting with defining the condition to determine its short- and long-term effects on the patient. It will further direct the reader through diagnosis, going through the advancements made in cardiac imaging, especially three-dimensional modeling and echocardiography. The discussion of predisposing factors, technical considerations intrinsic to procedural interventions, and clinical implications is therefore an important part of the discourse and helps set a foundation for an in-depth exploration of contemporary and emerging treatment modalities. From the incorporation of various surgical and percutaneous techniques to the tactical uses of devices, in particular, the AMPLATZer Vascular Plug, associated with the technical development of transcatheter closure, the current review tries to present a panoramic view of PVL management, from diagnosis to closure and insight into mitigation of its impact on outcomes.

[How I deal with this unusual paravalvular leak]

Percutaneous treatment of para-prosthetic valve leaks (PVL) is an alternative to redo surgery. Based on the clinical case of an unusual aortic para-prosthetic leak closure (PVLc), are presented successively the diagnostic difficulties of PVL, the modalities of therapeutic choice, the main technical steps of PVLc followed by a review of results and complications.

Paravalvular Leak Closure After Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Using a Steerable Sheath

We present the case of an 82-year-old woman with persistent fatigue, exertional dyspnea, and dizziness related to a paravalvular leak following a self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Successful closure was performed using a steerable sheath to negotiate a vascular plug closure device through the self-expanding valve structure.

Percutaneous versus surgical closure of paravalvular leaks in prosthetic valves: A cross-sectional comparison of clinical outcomes

Background and Aims

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a serious complication of prosthetic valve replacement. Both surgical and percutaneous closure techniques are used for PVL closure, but optimal strategies and comparative outcomes are uncertain. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of percutaneous versus surgical PVL closure by analyzing changes in leak severity, functional status, echocardiographic parameters, and clinical outcomes.

Methods

A total of 72 patients were included in this retrospective cross-sectional single-center study comparing percutaneous (n = 25) and surgical (n = 47) PVL closure from 2015 to 2022. Demographics, medical history, echocardiograms, laboratory data, complications, and mortality data were extracted from the records. Changes in leak severity, NYHA class, echocardiographic parameters, and clinical outcomes were compared between the percutaneous and surgical groups.

Results

Both percutaneous and surgical PVL closure significantly reduced leak severity and improved NYHA class (both p < 0.01), with no difference between the quantity of changes in each group. The 30-day mortality was 4% after percutaneous and 6.4% after surgical closure (p = 0.65). At 90 days, mortality was 24% percutaneous versus 17% surgical (p = 0.48). The length of stay in the hospital and post-procedural decrease in hemoglobin were considerably lower in the percutaneous group. The rate of complication rates was similar between the groups. Echocardiographic changes were also comparable.

Conclusion

Percutaneous and surgical PVL closure had similar efficacy in reducing leaks and improving symptoms, with no significant difference in early outcomes. Both options should be considered viable for PVL repair after heart team evaluation.

Transcatheter mitral paravalvular closure: a single centre experience with techniques and outcomes

BACKGROUND

In patients with symptomatic mitral PVL, successful transcatheter reduction of the PVL to less than mild is associated with significant improvement in short- and midterm survival.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we present our single-centre, same operators' experience on percutaneous paravalvular leak closure with techniques and outcomes.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational designed study, we retrieved hospital records of patients with a surgical history of mechanical or biological prosthetic valve replacement and who subsequently underwent transcatheter mitral paravalvular leak closure (TMPLC). All procedures were performed by the same operators.

RESULTS

A total of 45 patients with 58 PVDs underwent TMPLC using 60 devices. All patients had moderate or severe mitral paravalvular regurgitation associated with symptomatic HF (15.6%), clinically significant haemolytic anaemia (57.8%) or both (26.7%). The technical success rate was 91.4%, with 53 defects successfully occluded. The clinical success rate was 75.6%. Among the clinical success parameters, the preprocedural median ejection fraction increased from 45% (35-55) to 50% (40-55) (p = .04). Mitral gradients decreased from max/mean 18/8 mmHg to max/mean 16/7 mmHg; p = .02). Haemoglobin levels increased from 9.9 (8.5-11.1) to 11.1 (3-13); p = .003. LDH levels decreased from 875 (556-1125) to 435 (314-579); p: <.001. All-cause 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates were the same at 8.9%.

CONCLUSION

This single-centre study with a limited number of patients confirmed that TMPLC is a safe and effective procedure to improve symptoms and severity of PVL.

Impact of a Successful Percutaneous Mitral Paravalvular Leak Closure on Long-term Major Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous mitral paravalvular leak (PVL) closure techniques are an effective and safe alternative to surgical treatment, but data regarding long-term outcomes are scarce. We aim to describe the impact of successful percutaneous mitral PVL closure on long-term outcomes.

METHODS

All consecutive patients in whom a first-attempt percutaneous mitral PVL closure was performed in a single tertiary centre between January 2010 and October 2021 were included. Clinical variables, procedural details, and procedural success were collected. Patients were classified based on procedural success, defined as no more than mild residual leak. All-cause mortality was the primary endpoint. Cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs) were key secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

Ninety patients (median age 72.5 years [66.0-78.4]; median EuroSCORE-II 8.2 [5.3-12.46]) were included. Although reduction of at least 1 degree in PVL severity was achieved in 82 (91.1%), procedural success was achieved in 47 (52.2%). Chronic kidney disease, previous surgery for PVL, and the presence of multiple jets were independently associated with procedural failure. After a median follow-up of 3.2 (1.2-5.2) years, mortality rate was higher in the procedural failure group (27.3 per 100 patients-years) compared with the group with successful closure (8.2 per 100 patient-years). Procedural failure was associated with all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41-4.78), cardiovascular death (aHR, 3.53; 95% CI, 1.67-7.49) and HFH (aHR, 3.27; 95% CI,1.72-6.20).

CONCLUSIONS

A successful reduction in PVL to mild or absent is associated with improved rates of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and HFHs.

Complications in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A comprehensive analysis and management strategies

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) marks a significant advancement in treating aortic stenosis (AS), especially for patients with high surgical risks. This concise review outlines TAVR's development, its broader application to include lower-risk patients, and innovations in the device and procedural technology. Clinical trials, notably the PARTNER series, affirm TAVR's efficacy, showing it matches or surpasses surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in mortality reduction, hemodynamic benefits, and symptom alleviation, including heart failure. However, TAVR entails complications such as paravalvular leakage (PVL), conduction disorders, and increased cerebrovascular event risks. We evaluate these issues, their prevalence, causative factors, and clinical consequences, emphasizing improvements in valve design and technique that have significantly lowered PVL rates. The role of aortic valve anatomy and calcification in PVL and conduction issues is analyzed, underlining the necessity for meticulous patient selection and procedural planning. Further, the review delves into cerebrovascular event risks, their origins, and preventative strategies, including cerebral protection devices and the judicious use of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies. TAVR presents a less invasive, promising alternative to SAVR, but requires careful complication management to optimize patient results. Ongoing innovation and research are vital for advancing TAVR's techniques, improving valve designs, and extending its reach, thereby enhancing AS patients' quality of life.

Transcatheter Paravalvular Leak Closure With Covered Stent Tract and Vascular Plug: Tootsie Roll Technique

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter closure of transcatheter heart valve (THV)-related paravalvular leak (PVL) is associated with a high failure rate with available devices due to the complex interaction of THV and aortic/mitral annulus.

OBJECTIVES

This study reports on novel transcatheter techniques to treat PVL after THV.

METHODS

The authors describe consecutive patients who underwent PVL closure after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR). A covered self-expanding stent (Viabahn) was deployed in the defect to create a seal between the THV and annulus. A vascular plug (Amplatzer Vascular Plug 2 [AVP2] or AVP4) was then deployed inside the covered stent to obliterate PVL.

RESULTS

Eight patients with THV-related PVL were treated using this method (aortic [3 SAPIEN, 1 Evolut], mitral [2 SAPIEN-in-MAC (mitral annular calcification), 2 M3 TMVR). Various combinations of stents and plugs were used (5 mm × 2.5 cm Viabahn + 6 mm AVP4 [n = 2], 8 mm × 2.5 cm Viabahn + 10 mm AVP2 [n = 5], and 10 mm × 5.0 cm Viabahn + 12 mm AVP2 [n = 1]). All had technical success with immediate elimination of target PVL, without in-hospital complications. None had signs of postprocedure hemolysis. All patients were discharged alive (median 3.5 days [Q1-Q3: 1.0-4.8 days]). No residual PVL was seen at discharge, except for 1 patient with mild regurgitation due to another untreated PVL location. One patient died before 30 days due to complication of valve-in-MAC TMVR. In remaining patients, none had recurrence of PVL at 30 days. Symptoms decreased to NYHA functional class I/II in 6 patients. NYHA functional class III symptoms remained in 1 patient with mitral regurgitation awaiting subsequent valve replacement procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

The technique of sequential deployment of a covered stent and vascular plug may effectively treat THV-related PVL.

Utility of Konar-Multifunctional Occluder in Complex Situations: Unconventional Uses in Rare Situations

KONAR-MFO (multifunctional occluder) [Lifetech, Shenzhen, China] was first used in humans in 2013 and received the CE mark in May 2018. As name suggest, it can be use in various(multifunctional) situations in paediatric as well as adults. This is a versatile device with an improved delivery and flexibility which make this device a better option to be use with more comfort and minimum complications. This paper is regarding few rare and complicated lesions, like anomalous origin of coronary artery from pulmonary artery (ALCAPA) device closure, device closure of ventricular septal rupture (VSR) post myocardial infarction in sick elderly and finally device closure of paravalvar leak (PVL)after mitral valve replacement which were treated with this device with excellent results. This study is a retrospective review from a tertiary level dedicated cardiac referral centre in south India. Three cases we are reporting here in which Konar-multifunctional occluders were used in locations other than commoner and regular defects like patent ductus arteriosus, ventricular septal defect etc, over the span of one year between April 2022 and March 2023. Pre-procedure, all patients underwent detailed clinical evaluation followed by transthoracic echocardiography, 12-lead electrocardiogram, and Chest X-ray at the outpatient department. All patients were either symptomatic or had a hemodynamically significant lesion on echocardiography. The decision for transcatheter management was taken after discussing with surgical team in view of either high risk surgery or refusal from patients for surgical options. All patients were followed up post procedure at regular intervals with transthoracic echocardiograms and 12-lead electrocardiograms for a minimum period of 6 months. All these three cases mentioned in our study underwent a complete closure of their respective lesions with no evidence of residual shunt. None of these patients had any major complications, prolonged stay, or any vascular injuries. All patients completed minimum 6-month follow-up and were doing well without any residual flows. First case of ALCAPA, after procedure showed improvement in IVCD, QTc duration and also no significant ischemic changes were noted. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy was done after 6 months of procedure which showed improvement in contractile function and perfusion of left ventricle. Second case of VSR device closure patient showed immediate significant symptomatic improvement. He was transferred to the coronary care unit, and discharged seven days later. As of now the patient is alive and feeling well with no residual shunt detected by transthoracic echocardiography. No procedure -related complications have been recorded during last two years. Third case of PVL device closure had uneventful recovery from anaesthesia. Prosthetic valve functioned normally during the 5 days of post-procedure hospitalization. The transthoracic 2D- echocardiography performed during follow-up at the end of one month showed no mitral PVL.During follow-up after 1 year, the patient improved symptomatically. Normal prosthetic valve function and no leakage documented on transthoracic echocardiography. Konar-MFO emerging as an important occluder with interesting attributes which makes it a very useful asset to have in catheterizations laboratory.

Percutaneous paravalvular leak closure after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the international PLUGinTAVI Registry

BACKGROUND

Data regarding the safety and long-term effectiveness of percutaneous closure of paravalvular leak (PVL) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are scarce.

AIMS

This study aims to present a large multicentre international experience of percutaneous post-TAVI PVL closure.

METHODS

All patients who underwent percutaneous post-TAVI PVL closure in 14 hospitals across Europe and North America between January 2018 and October 2022 were included.

RESULTS

Overall, 45 patients (64% male) were enrolled. The median age was 80 years (75-84). Among them, 67% and 33% had self-expanding and balloon-expandable valve implantations, respectively. Baseline post-TAVI PVL was severe in 67% of cases and moderate in the rest. The time from index TAVI to PVL closure procedure was 16.1 (8.7-34.8) months. Most patients were in NYHA Class III and IV (73%) before the procedure, and 40% had referred hospitalisations for heart failure between TAVI and the PVL closure procedure. Successful PVL closure was achieved in 94%, reducing regurgitation to ≤mild in 91% and moderate in the rest. The Amplatzer Valvular Plug III was the most frequently used device (27 cases), followed by the Amplatzer Valvular Plug 4. The incidence of severe adverse events was 11%. None of the patients died during the index hospitalisation. During long-term follow-up (21.7±16.2 months), the all-cause mortality rate was 14%, and patients presented improvement in functional status and a significant reduction in the rate of hospitalisation for heart failure (from 40% to 6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous PVL closure is a feasible and safe option for treating post-TAVI leaks. Successful PVL reduction to mild or less could be associated with acute and long-lasting improvements in clinical outcomes.

A Treatment Dilemma: Bentall vs Transcatheter Paravalvular Leak Closure with Aortic Aneurysm Repair in a High Surgical Risk Patient

This case presentation involves an 80-year-old male with a history of surgically repaired patent ductus arteriosus and surgical aortic valve replacement due to infective endocarditis, who presented with progressive heart failure symptoms and was found to have a severe aortic paravalvular leak (PVL) and ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm. Due to complex surgical anatomy and multiple chronic comorbidities, he was considered a poor candidate for traditional valve replacement surgery including the Bentall procedure. Instead, a multidisciplinary team opted for transcatheter paravalvular leak closure (TPLC) with an Amplatzer plug followed by planned endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. The patient showed significant improvement in symptoms and reduction in aneurysm size post-procedure leading to avoidance of the open-heart surgery. This case highlights the effectiveness of the percutaneous approach in high-risk surgical patients with PVL and complex anatomical considerations.

Contemporary Review of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Interventions for Mitral Regurgitation

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the most common form of valvular heart disease in the United States, and there are established guidelines for indications for requiring mitral valve surgeries. However, there is an unmet clinical need for a subset of high-risk MR patients, especially those with advanced age, heart failure and/or secondary MR. Following the successes of transcatheter aortic valve replacements, significant advances have occurred over the last decade in transcatheter mitral valve interventions in order to manage these patients in both clinical practice and trials. The three main types of these interventions include a transcatheter edge-to-edge repair, percutaneous mitral annuloplasty (both direct and indirect) and transcatheter mitral valve replacement (including when applied to a prior prosthetic valve, annuloplasty ring and mitral annuloplasty ring). This review aims to discuss the contemporary techniques, evidence, indications, multimodality imaging evaluations and outcomes of the various transcatheter mitral valve interventions.

Correlation of Clinical Outcomes with the Prominent Indication of Transcatheter Paravalvular Leak Closure: A Multicenter Experience

BACKGROUND

A paravalvular leak (PVL) is a complication following valve replacement, which may lead to heart failure and hemolysis. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the clinical outcome after transcatheter PVL closure differs according to the prominent indication of the procedure (symptoms of heart failure or hemolysis).

METHODS

The data of consecutive patients who had transcatheter treatment for PVL between July 2011 and September 2022 in five Greek centers were analyzed. The primary endpoint was the technical, and clinical success rates with regards to the prominent indication of paravalvular leak closure. The secondary endpoints included the evaluation and comparison of the clinical and technical success in relation to the type of valve that was treated (aortic or mitral) as well as the survival analysis in relation to the closure indication and type of valve that was treated.

RESULTS

In total, 60 patients were retrospectively studied (39% men, mean age 69.5 ± 11 years). Regarding the primary outcomes, the technical success in patients mainly suffering from hemolysis was 86.1%, while in those presenting heart failure it was 95.8%, p = 0.387. Furthermore, the clinical success was 72.2% and 87.5% among hemolysis and heart failure patients, respectively, p = 0.210. During the follow-up period, the two-year survival rates were significantly better for patients treated for the aortic valve (78.94%) compared to those in the mitral position (48.78%), p = 0.014. In total, 25 patients died (41.7%) during 24 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Transcatheter paravalvular leak closure can be performed with high technical and clinical success rates without any difference according to the prominent indication of closure.

Surgery for delayed leaflet impingement after transcatheter closure of a paravalvular leak associated with an aortic pseudoaneurysm

Background: Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a recognized and challenging complication after surgical or transcatheter valve replacement. The transcatheter closure of PVL has become the first-line treatment in clinical practice when the procedure is not contraindicated. Transcatheter PVL closure rests on a complex procedure and complications still occur in approximately 9% of patients. Case Report: We describe the case of a delayed mechanical prosthetic leaflet impingement after transcatheter closure of a paravalvular leak associated with a Valsalva pseudoaneurysm that required an urgent surgery. Conclusion: Aorta-left ventricle communication could be a relative contraindication to be assessed on a case-by-case basis, but transcatheter closure does not preclude subsequent attempt for surgical repair and outcome.

Procedural Tools and Technics for Transcatheter Paravalvular Leak Closure: Lessons from a Decade of Experience

Prosthetic paravalvular leaks (PVLs) are associated with congestive heart failure and hemolysis. Surgical PVL closure carries high risks. Transcatheter implantation of occluding devices in PVL is a lower risk but challenging procedure. Of the available devices, only two have been specifically approved in Europe for transcatheter PVL closure (tPVLc): the Occlutech^® Paravalvular Leak Device (PLD) and Amplatzer™ ParaValvular Plug 3 (AVP 3). Here, we review the various tools and devices used for tPVLc, based on three observational registries including 748 tPVLc procedures performed in 2005-2021 at 33 centres in 11 countries. In this case, 12 registry investigators with over 20 tPVLc procedures each described their practical tips and tricks regarding imaging, approaches, delivery systems, and devices. They considered three-dimensional echocardiography to be the cornerstone of PVL assessment and procedure guidance. Anterograde trans-septal mitral valve and retrograde aortic approaches were used in most centres, although some investigators preferred the transapical approach. Hydrophilic-coated low-profile sheaths were used most often for device deployment. The AVP 3 and PLD devices were chosen for 89.0% of procedures. Further advances in design and materials are awaited. These complex procedures require considerable expertise, and experience accumulated over a decade has no doubt contributed to improve practices.

Predictors of Clinical Success After Transcatheter Paravalvular Leak Closure: An International Prospective Multicenter Registry

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter closure of a symptomatic prosthetic paravalvular leak (PVL) is feasible, but there is presently no conclusive evidence to show consistent efficacy. We aimed to identify predictors of clinical success after transcatheter PVL closure.

METHODS

Consecutive patients referred to 24 European centers for transcatheter PVL closure in 2017 to 2019 were included in a prospective registry (Fermeture de Fuite ParaProthétique, FFPP). Clinical success was absence of any of the following within 1 month: re-admission for heart failure, blood transfusion, open-heart valvular surgery, and death.

RESULTS

We included 216 symptomatic patients, who underwent 238 percutaneous PVL closure procedures on the mitral (64.3%), aortic (34.0%), or tricuspid (1.7%) valve. Symptoms were heart failure, hemolytic anemia, or both in 48.9%, 7.8%, and 43.3% of patients, respectively. One, 2, and 3 leaks were treated during the same procedure in 69.6%, 26.6%, and 3.8% of patients, respectively. The PVL was pinpoint or involved 1/8 or 1/4 of the valve circumference in 18.6%, 52.4%, and 28.1% of cases, respectively. The most frequently used devices were the Vascular Plug 3, Ventricular Septal Defect Occluder, Vascular Plug 2, and Paravalvular Leak Device (45.0%, 16.6%, 14.2%, and 13.6% of cases, respectively). Successful device(s) implantation with leak reduction to ≤grade 2 was obtained in 85.0% of mitral and 91.4% of aortic procedures, respectively (P=0.164); with major periprocedural adverse event rates of 3.3% and 1.2%, respectively (P=0.371); and clinical success rates of 70.3% and 88.0%, respectively (P=0.004). By multivariate analysis, technical failure, mechanical valve, and hemolytic anemia were independently associated with absence of clinical success (odds ratios [95% CIs], 7.7 [2.0-25.0]; P=0.002; 3.6 [1.1-11.1]; P=0.036; and 3.7 [1.2-11.9]; P=0.025; respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Transcatheter PVL closure is efficient and safe in symptomatic patients but is associated with a lower clinical success rate in patients with hemolysis and/or a mechanical valve.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique identifiers: NCT05089136.

A Comparison of the Catheter-Based Transapical and Surgical Treatment Modalities for Mitral Paravalvular Leak

Background: There is a lack of studies where the outcomes of mitral paravalvular leak treatment were compared between surgery and catheter-based closure. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of re-do surgery with transapical catheter-based paravalvular leak closure. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study at a single institution; 76 patients were included. According to the treatment, two groups were formed: the “Surgical” group (49 patients after re-do surgery) and the “Catheter” group (27 patients after transapical catheter–based treatment). Results: In-hospital myocardial infarction occurred in 9 (18%) cases in the “Surgical” group and none in the “Catheter” group, p = 0.018. Procedure-related life-threatening bleeding occurred in 9 (18%) patients in the “Surgical” group and none in the “Catheter” group, p = 0.018. Nine (18%) patients died in 30 days in the “Surgical” group, and none died in the “Catheter” group, p = 0.039. A mean follow-up was 3.3 years. No difference was found between the groups by the degree of residual paravalvular regurgitation either at discharge or at follow-up. During the follow-up, 19 (39%) patients died in the “Surgical” group and 2 (7%) among the “Catheter” patients. Conclusions: Transapical catheter-based closure of mitral paravalvular leak seems to be a safer treatment procedure than conventional re-do surgery, and the effectiveness of these procedures does not differ.

Percutaneous Closure of Mitral Paravalvular Leak: Long-Term Results in a Single-Center Experience

Background: Paravalvular leak occurs in 5–17% of patients following surgical valve replacement, more often in mitral position. The prognosis without treatment is poor. Percutaneous device closure represents an alternative to repeat surgery. The objective of this work is to evaluate the medium and long-term results in the percutaneous closure of PVL in mitral prosthesis. Methods: This observational study is based on a retrospective registry including consecutive mitral PVL cases undergoing percutaneous closure at a single tertiary-care center from April 2010 to December 2020. The safety and efficacy results of the procedure, at 90 days and in the long term, were analyzed. Also, predictors of procedure failure and long-term events were identified. Results: A total of 128 consecutive mitral paravalvular leak closure procedures were included. Technical success was achieved in 115 (89.8%) procedures. The presence of multiple PVLs was the sole factor that independently predicted procedural failure. Median follow-up of our sample was 41.8 months (mean 47.7 ± 35.7 months). Underlying hemolytic anemia as the indication for PVL closure, a recent admission for decompensated HF, and lack of improvement in functional class emerged as consistent predictors of MACE and death during long-term follow-up, while lack of procedural success during the first PVL procedure and chronic kidney disease were also associated with MACE during follow-up. Conclusions: Percutaneous mitral PVL closure displayed high technical and procedural success rates, with an acceptable safety profile, in a high-risk population. Percutaneous mitral PVL closure achieved an improvement in short- and long-term functional class and a reduction of hemolysis in the vast majority of patients. In addition, long-term survival in our study was good, in particular for patients undergoing successful PVL closure procedures.

3D-Printing to Plan Complex Transcatheter Paravalvular Leaks Closure

Background: Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leak (PVL) has emerged as an alternative to surgical management in selected cases. Achieving complete PVL occlusion, while respecting prosthesis function remains challenging. A multimodal imaging analysis of PVL morphology before and during the procedure is mandatory to select an appropriate device. We aim to explore the additional value of 3D printing in predicting device related adverse events including mechanical valve leaflet blockade, risk of device embolization and residual shunting. Methods: From the FFPP registries (NCT05089136 and NCT05117359), we included 11 transcatheter PVL closure procedures from three centers for which 3D printed models were produced. Cardiac CT was used for segmentation for 3D printed models (3D-heartmodeling, Caissargues, France). Technology used a laser to fuse very fine powders (TPU Thermoplastic polyurethane) into a final part-laser sintering technology (SLS) with an adapted elasticity. A simulation on 3D printed model was performed using a set of occluders. Results: PVLs were located around aortic prostheses in six cases, mitral prostheses in four cases and tricuspid ring in one case. The device chosen during the simulation on the 3D printed model matched the one implanted in eight cases. In the three other cases, a similar device type was chosen during the procedures but with a different size. A risk of prosthesis leaflet blockade was identified on 3D printed models in four cases. During the procedure, the occluder was removed before release in one case. In another case the device was successfully repositioned and released. In two patients, leaflet impingement was observed post-operatively and surgical device removal had to be performed. Conclusion: In a case-series of complex transcatheter PVL closure procedures, hands-on simulation testing on 3D printed models proved its usefulness to plan and facilitate these challenging procedures.

Percutaneous closure of a paravalvular leak from a prosthetic mitral valve dehiscence in a young high-risk patient: case report

BACKGROUND

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a common, serious complication related with prosthetic valve replacement. Although surgical closure reoperation is the choice of treatment, percutaneous device closure is a good alternative with good results in patients with very high surgical risk.

CASE SUMMARY

In this case report, we present the percutaneous closure of PVL of mitral valve replacement (MVR), in a patient with cardiogenic shock who failed conservative medical treatment and was deemed inoperable due to recurrent operations. Successful closure of the PVL with the use of the four consecutive PVL closure devices was performed under general anaesthesia with guidance of 2D and 3D transoesophageal echocardiography. The procedure was performed with no complications and the patient has remained asymptomatic after 10 months following the PVL closure procedure with marked improvement in her NYHA class and echocardiographic values.

DISCUSSION

Percutaneous PVL closure is a very challenging and high clinical skills requiring procedure, but has a good success and low complication rate in high-risk patients. It is not a standard procedure and the type and size of device should be tailored for each patient with a good 2D and 3D echocardiographic guidance.

Percutaneous Paravalvular Leak Repair

Paravalvular leaks (PVLs) are challenging lesions that require a comprehensive understanding of surgical and transcatheter heart therapies, multimodality imaging, and transcatheter techniques. Approach to a transcatheter heart valve (THV) or surgical prosthesis for PVL differs in terms of options and varies according to the location (aortic or mitral). A suggested framework for transcatheter PVL repair is defect localization, access planning, defect crossing, sheath delivery. and occluder deployment. Careful planning facilitates success, but operators begin the case with a flexible mindset because many initial strategies may not succeed.

The management of paravalvular leaks post aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is uncommon but can lead to severe complications after surgical or transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Conditions associated with PVLs such as heart failure, hemolysis, and infective endocarditis can lead to catastrophic results if not treated promptly; the therapeutic goals differ according to the presentation. It is vital that PVLs are diagnosed early using various imaging modalities. Different approaches have been studied in managing PVLs; there is an increased interest in the transcatheter aortic valve closure procedure as it is minimally invasive and decreases the occurrence of further reinterventions.

AIM

To discuss the classification of PVLs, diagnostic approaches, and available management options.

METHOD

A literature review was performed using 28 studies.

RESULTS

This review evaluated the relationship between the time of diagnosis, management of PVL and the resulting outcomes.

DISCUSSION

Patients with PVL should be assessed through a multidisciplinary team approach and a patient-selective plan should be in place.

CONCLUSION

Open surgical intervention is reserved for complex cases where minimally invasive techniques cannot be utilized.

Safety, Efficacy and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients Treated with the Occlutech Paravalvular Leak Device for Significant Paravalvular Regurgitation

Between December 2014 and March 2021, 144 patients with aortic (Ao) or mitral (Mi) paravalvular leaks (PVLs) were enrolled at 21 sites in 10 countries. Safety data were available for 137 patients, who were included in the safety analysis fraction (SAF), 93 patients with Mi PVLs and 44 patients with Ao PVLs. The full analysis set (FAS) comprised 112 patients with available stratum (aortic/mitral leak) as well as baseline (BL), 180-day or later assessments (2 years). Procedural success (implantation of the device with a proper closure of the PVL, defined as reduction in paravalvular regurgitation of ≥one grade as assessed by echocardiography post implantation) was achieved in 91.3% of FAS patients with Mi PVLs and in 90.0% of those with Ao PVLs. The proportion of patients suffering from significant or severe heart failure (HF), classified as New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV, decreased from 80% at baseline to 14.1% at 2-year follow-up (FAS). The proportion of FAS patients needing hemolysis-related blood transfusion decreased from 35.5% to 3.8% and from 8.1% to 0% in Mi patients and Ao patients, respectively. In total, 35 serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in 27 patients (19.7%) of the SAF population. The SAEs considered possibly or probably related to the device included device embolization (three patients), residual leak (two patients) and vascular complication (one patient). During follow-up, 12/137 (8.8%) patients died, but none of the deaths was considered to be device-related. Patients implanted with the Occlutech Paravalvular Leak Device (PLD) showed long-lasting improvements in clinical parameters, including NYHA class and a reduced dependency on hemolysis-related blood transfusions.

Mitral Paravalvular Leak: Clinical Implications, Diagnosis and Management

Paravalvular leak incidence after mitral surgical replacement ranges from 7% to 17%. Between 1% and 5% of these are clinically significant. Large PVLs can cause important clinical manifestations such as heart failure or haemolysis. Current guidelines consider that surgical reparation is the gold-standard therapy in symptomatic patients with paravalvular leak. However, these recommendations are based in non-randomized observational registries. On the other hand, transcatheter paravalvular leak closure has shown excellent results with a low rate of complications, and nowadays it is considered the first option in selected patients in some experienced centres. In this review, we summarize the clinical manifestations, diagnosis, procedural details, and results of transcatheter mitral PVL closure.

Percutaneous Management of Bioprosthetic Mitral Valve Dehiscence with Combined Valve-in-Valve Replacement and Paravalvular Leak Closure

This case report describes a patient with bioprosthetic mitral valve dehiscence that resulted in severe paravalvular regurgitation and cardiogenic shock. Due to prohibitive surgical risk, valve-in-valve transcatheter mitral valve replacement was attempted but did not reduce the severity of the prosthetic paravalvular leak (PVL) severity. Subsequent percutaneous PVL closure with a ventricular septal defect occluder successfully reduced the PVL severity and led to significant clinical improvement.

Mitral valve paravalvular leaks: Comprehensive review of literature

BACKGROUND

Mitral paravalvular leaks (mPVL) are a recognized complication for patients with mitral valve prostheses. Although clinically insignificant for many patients, it may pose life-threatening haemolysis and regurgitation-induced heart failure, and so clinicians should have a high index of suspicion in the presence of new symptoms.

AIMS

This review discusses the pathogenesis, clinical features, diagnosis, imaging and treatment of mPVLs.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane database, Google Scholar and Ovid. Search terms used included "mitral valve paravalvular leak," "transthoracic echocardiography," "2D transoesophageal echocardiography," "3D transoesophageal echocardiography," "cardiac computed tomography," (CT) "cardiac magnetic resonance imaging," "intracardiac echocardiography," "cinefluoroscopy," "fluoroscopy," and "percutaneous closure."

RESULTS

All patients with mPVLs should undergo regular full evaluation, including patient history, physical examination, laboratory work-up, imaging, and referral, if necessary. Echocardiography is fundamental to the diagnosis, and is augmented with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, cardiac computerized tomography and fluoroscopy for further characterization and procedural planning amongst the structural heart team.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of mPVL is expected to increase proportionally to the growing number of surgical and transcatheter valve replacements conducted in the ageing population. Multimodal imaging is instrumental in guiding diagnostic and therapeutic strategies when managing mPVLs. Advances in imaging and capabilities of transcather devices will prompt growing uptake of percutaneous treatment over conventional, higher-risk surgery for mPVL management.

Percutaneous management of paravalvular leaks

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a challenging complication of valve replacement surgery that can cause heart failure and haemolysis. Surgical repair is the traditional treatment for severe, symptomatic PVL, but many patients with PVL fall into high-risk categories for redo surgery. Percutaneous techniques for closure of PVL have been increasingly refined over the last decade with availability of approved purpose-specific devices for closure. Percutaneous closure requires a heart team approach, with attention paid to appropriate preprocedural and periprocedural imaging to ensure a successful closure with minimal residual leak or complication. There are limited studies addressing the selection of a percutaneous approach to PVL. No randomised trials comparing surgical and percutaneous repair have been conducted. Large national registries from the UK and Ireland and from Spain have demonstrated that high rates of technical success can be achieved, with mortality comparable with surgical repair. Six retrospective studies comparing surgical and percutaneous approaches have been published. These broadly show comparable technical success between the interventions, with reduced short-term mortality among patients treated percutaneously. Long-term outcomes were similar between both treatment options. Percutaneous repair is an attractive treatment option in many patients due to its reduced invasiveness and quicker recovery period. However, more prospective studies are needed to validate its place in the armamentarium of the heart team.

Long-term outcomes of catheter-based intervention for clinically significant paravalvular leak

BACKGROUND

In most centres, clinically significant percutaneous paravalvular leak (PVL) closure following valve replacement surgery is reserved for those considered high-risk for surgery. There is a paucity of data regarding the long-term outcomes of these patients.

AIMS

Our goals were to assess the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous PVL closure.

METHODS

A total of 100 consecutive transcatheter PVL closure procedures (74 mitral, 26 aortic) were performed in 95 patients between February 2005 and August 2019 at our hospital. Data collected included procedural success rates, indication-specific outcomes and mortality.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 5.6±6.1 years, mean age 62.6±15.2 years, and 45.4% were female. The device was successfully implanted in 88 procedures (88.0%). Patients who presented with heart failure (n=57) had a significant improvement in NYHA classification (29.2% Class III/IV versus 100.0%, p<0.001). For patients who presented with haemolytic anaemia (n=38), haemoglobin increased (11.94±1.634 vs 9.72±1.49, p<0.001) and LDH levels were reduced (1,354.90±1,225.55 vs 2,039.40±1,347.20, p<0.001) following the procedure. Rates of mortality were 3.8% at 90 days, 15.6% after 1 year, and 27.2% after 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients who are deemed intermediate- to high-risk for repeat surgery, transcatheter PVL closure shows reasonable clinical success rates, with a significant improvement in symptoms, and a relatively low rate of periprocedural complications.

Update in Paravalvular Leak Closure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Given the low occurrence of clinically important paravalvular leak (PVL), there are no large registries or trials in this space to investigate management strategies. This review integrates newer evidence, particularly in imaging guidance for these complex procedures, novel techniques and approaches that our group has taken, as well as approaches to more complex PVL plugging reported in case reports.

RECENT FINDINGS

Perhaps the largest area of growth in the management of PVL is the use of advanced imaging in both pre-procedure evaluation and intra-procedural guidance with gated cardiac CT, 3D TEE, and fluoroscopy fusion technologies. Outside the USA, a new device, the Occlutech PLD, has become available with early data indicating high success rates. There remains little randomized data to support the efficacy of percutaneous PVL closure. Gated cardiac CT has become key to the pre-procedure evaluation for transcatheter closure as it allows for increased procedural efficiency and more accurate pre-procedure planning, particularly when combined with 3D printing. Intra-procedural TEE-fluoro fusion allows for more rapid crossing of defects by providing a visual target for interventionalists. The advent of purpose-built devices for PVL closure may further increase the efficacy and efficiency of percutaneous closure, but significant barriers remain for approval of these devices in the USA.

EchoNavigator® technology facilitates transapical mitral paravalvular leak closure: a case report

Background

Catheter-based closure has emerged as a less invasive alternative to surgery in high-risk patients with paravalvular leak (PVL) and clinically significant regurgitation with feasibility and efficacy demonstrated in multiple studies.

Case summary

A 72-year-old female with a past history of long-standing rheumatic heart disease underwent mechanical mitral valve replacement in 2008. Ten years later, redo surgery was performed due to a worsening mitral PVL and the leakage was closed by direct pledget-supported sutures, preserving the mechanical valve. She was recently admitted again for haemolytic anaemia and congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association Classes III-IV) due to a recurrent mitral PVL. We report our initial clinical experience using a novel software solution (EchoNavigator^®-system) for intuitive guidance during a catheter-based transapical mitral PVL closure.

Discussion

Transapical mitral PVL closure with a specifically designed device demonstrated in our case to be a better option than redo surgery. Recently introduced fusion imaging modalities enhanced visualization of soft tissue anatomy and device location improving enormously the results of this challenging intervention.

Mechanical Hemolysis Complicating Transcatheter Interventions for Valvular Heart Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Mechanical intravascular hemolysis is frequently observed following procedures on heart valves and uncommonly observed in native valvular disease. In most cases, its severity is mild. Nevertheless, it can be clinically significant and even life threatening, requiring multiple blood transfusions and renal replacement therapy. This paper reviews the current knowledge on mechanical intravascular hemolysis in valvular disease, before and after correction, focusing on pathophysiology, approach to diagnosis, and impact of other hematological conditions on the resultant anemia. The importance of a multidisciplinary management is underscored. Laboratory data are provided about subclinical hemolysis that is commonly observed following the implantation of surgical and transcatheter valve prostheses and devices. Finally, clinical scenarios are reviewed and current medical and surgical treatments are discussed, including alternative options for inoperable patients.

Percutaneous devices for the treatment of complex native valve mitral leaflet and aortomitral continuity defects: Review and case series

Percutaneous closure of paravalvar leaks (PVLs) was once only performed in extreme or non-surgical risk cases not suitable for redo-surgery with tissue or mechanical valves. This technique is now the treatment of choice with long term outcomes that are better than redo operations.¹²³ As interventionalists become more familiar with using PVL devices, more off label device use has been reported in non-surgical cases involving complex native mitral valve regurgitation (NVMR). In this review, we appraise the literature regarding percutaneous treatment of paravalvar leaks and more recently esoteric off label use. We also describe two recent challenging cases where percutaneous devices were used to treat severe leaks that developed as a sequela of previous infective endocarditis. We also provide specific recommendations regarding periprocedural strategy and focus on the importance of device choice to provide an optimal outcome.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe pure aortic regurgitation due to active aortitis

Aortitis is an uncommon systemic inflammatory disease affecting the aorta and its main branches. Severe aortic regurgitation (AR) represents a fearsome complication of aortitis and is associated with an increased mortality rate. Surgical aortic valve replacement represents the only treatment choice for these patients. However, it is associated with a higher risk of medium to long-term complications such as prosthetic valve detachment. This is the first reported case where severe AR secondary to aortitis was managed with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). TAVI was safe and effective in this clinical setting and may be considered a viable alternative to high-risk surgery in these complex patients.

Transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair for annuloplasty ring dehiscence: The peri-ring approach

Recurrent severe primary mitral regurgitation from annuloplasty ring dehiscence is very rare and is associated with adverse outcomes. We present a case where transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral repair with MitraClip was used in high surgical risk patient using a peri-ring approach due to unfavorable anatomy for a conventional intra-ring approach.

Paravalvular leak closure: Still a challenge with unpredictable results

INTRODUCTION

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a common serious complication associated with prosthetic valve implantation.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to report our single-center experience in a retrospective review and to analyze possible predictors of success.

METHODS

We performed 33 percutaneous PVL closures in 26 patients (54% female, mean age 65±13 years). All mitral prostheses were studied previously with 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and aortic prostheses with 2D/3D TEE. 3D TEE and fluoroscopy were used for the assessment, planning, and guidance of the interventions. Twelve patients also underwent computed tomography angiography for better characterization of anatomic details.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients (69.2%) were admitted due to heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] III or IV, seven (26.9%) because of heart failure and hemolysis, and one (3.8%) due to hemolysis only. Regarding the leaks, 46.2% were in aortic and 53.8% in mitral prostheses, 88.5% in mechanical and 7.7% in biological prostheses, and 3.8% in transcatheter aortic valve implants. All the aortic patients had severe aortic regurgitation. Furthermore, all mitral patients but one had moderate to severe or severe mitral regurgitation. Closure was successful in 17 patients (65.4%), partially successful in four (15.4%) and unsuccessful in five (19.2%). After the procedure, 69% were in NYHA I-II. Hemolysis worsened in three patients despite successful closure; all required further valvular surgery and two died. Regarding angiographic and echocardiographic procedural success, we analyzed age, gender, type of prosthesis (mechanical or biological), location (aortic or mitral), clinical data, maximum leak diameter, anatomic regurgitant orifice, leak location (anterior, posterior, inferior and lateral for mitral leaks and left, right and non-coronary sinus for aortic leaks), and number of devices (plugs) used for closure. No parameters presented a significant relationship with success excepting previous hemolysis. There was a relationship between clinical improvement and reduction of PVL (p=0.0001). In follow-up, cardiac-related events (new hospital admissions, cardiac valvular surgery, need for transfusion) were more frequent in patients with partially successful or unsuccessful closure (p=0.012). There was a relationship between cardiac-related events and death (p=0.029).

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous PVL closure has emerged as an alternative treatment for PVL. Predictors of procedural success are difficult to establish. Survival is related to reduction of regurgitation and improvement in NYHA functional class.

Transbrachial Access for Transcatheter Closure of Paravalvular Leak Following Prosthetic Valve Replacement

Background: Transcatheter closure of paravalvular leak (PVL) has evolved into an alternative to surgery in high-risk patients. In this study, we introduce a new access for transcatheter closure of PVL and seek to evaluate the feasibility and safety of this access.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing transbrachial access for transcatheter mitral or aortic PVL closure (August 2017–November 2019) at our hospital. All patients underwent puncture of the brachial artery under local anesthesia.

Results: The study population included 11 patients, with an average age of 55.91 ± 14.82 years. Ten out of 11 patients were successfully implanted with devices via the brachial artery approach, and one patient was converted to the transseptal approach. The technical success rate of transbrachial access was 90.9%. Mean NYHA functional class improved from 3.1 ± 0.5 before the procedure to 1.9 ± 0.5 after PVL closure. Severe paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) in five patients and moderate PVR in six patients prior to the procedure were significantly reduced to mild in four patients and none in seven patients after the procedure. Complications included one case of pseudoaneurysm and one case of moderate hemolysis aggravation after closure. One patient had an unknown cause of sudden death within 24 h after the procedure. The half-year mortality rate during follow-up was 9.1% (1/11).

Conclusions: Transbrachial access for transcatheter closure of PVL may be a feasible and safe treatment and should include well-selected patients. It has several potential advantages of simplifying the procedure process and reducing postprocedural bed rest time.

Transcatheter closure of paravalvular leak: Multicenter experience and follow-up

BACKGROUND

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a common complication following valve replacement, which leads to heart failure and hemolysis. Transcatheter PVL closure has emerged as a reliable alternative with promising results. We quote the combined three-center experience of PVL patients treated percutaneously.

METHODS

Consecutive patients treated percutaneously for PVL were retrospectively studied. Procedural characteristics, inhospital, and long-term clinical outcomes were assessed. Technical (successful deployment) and clinical (NYHA and/or hemolysis improvement) success were evaluated.

RESULTS

In total, 39 patients treated for PVL in either the aortic (12 patients) or the mitral (27 patients) position were studied. Amplatzer Vascular Plug III was the most commonly used device among the 45 devices totally implanted. Postprocedurally, the rates of at least moderate PVL (87.5% preprocedurally vs 10.5% at discharge) and functional status (mean NYHA class 2.8 ± 0.7 on admission vs 1.5 ± 0.8 at follow-up) were statistically significantly improved. Total population technical success rate was 89.7%, being comparable between patients treated for mitral or aortic valve PVLs (92.6% vs 83.3%, respectively). Clinical success was achieved in 82.1% of patient cohort without statistical difference among those with isolated aortic or mitral PVL or among those with PVL closure an indication of heart failure or hemolysis. During a mean follow-up of 33.5 months, five patients died, including one periprocedural death.

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter recorded experience confirms that percutaneous PVL closure can be performed with high technical and clinical success rates and limited complications that lead to significant PVL reduction and functional status improvement.

Closure of a Prosthetic Mitral Valve Paravalvular Leak Using a Ventricular Septal Defect (VSD) Amplatzer Occluder Device

BACKGROUND Paravalvular leaks (PVL) are becoming more commonly experienced in clinical practice due to the increasing number of mitral valve replacements performed. There are about 182 000 valve replacements performed annually, with a 5-15% prevalence rate of paravalvular leaks. Due to increased mortality associated with surgical repair, percutaneous transcatheter closure procedures are increasingly being performed as an alternative to repeat surgery. CASE REPORT We present the case of a 52-year-old woman with past medical history of mitral valve endocarditis who developed worsening acute heart failure 1 month after surgical bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement. Transesophageal echocardiography at the time revealed dehiscence of the bioprosthetic mitral valve and severe mitral regurgitation. She subsequently had emergent surgical bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement and annular reconstruction. The post-operative course was complicated by increasing dyspnea and lower-extremity edema, with recurrent pericardial tamponade requiring placement of a pericardial window. Based on her multiple comorbidities, most notably the concomitant right ventricular failure with severe pulmonary hypertension and prior pericardial patch repair with compromise of her mitral valve annulus, she was deemed inoperable for re-do surgery and eventually underwent a successful percutaneous closure of the mitral paravalvular leak with a ventricular septal defect (VSD) Amplatzer occluder device. The patient made good recovery and was discharged home a few days after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS Although use of the Amplatzer VSD occluder device for this indication currently remains off-label, our report supports the use of the VSD occluder device in this subset of patients considering the high mortality rates associated with repeat surgical procedure.

A comprehensive review of the diagnosis and management of mitral paravalvular leakage

Mitral paravalvular leaks (PVLs) commonly occur in patients with prosthetic valves. Paravalvular defects may be clinically inconsequential and may aggravate hemolysis or cause heart failure through regurgitation. Accordingly, patients may eventually require intervention such as redo surgery or a transcatheter closure of the defects. The introduction of purpose-specific closure devices and new steerable catheters has opened a new frontier for the transcatheter PVL closure. This mode of treatment is an initial therapy in most centers with experienced structural heart team. However, head-to-head data comparing two treatment modalities (surgery and transcatheter closure) are limited, and the world-wide experience is based on nonrandomized studies. Multimodality imaging, including three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography, facilitates the delineation of mitral PVLs and provides essential data that aids the communication between the members of the structural heart team. In the near future, the success of interventional therapies will most probably increase in patients with mitral PVLs with the introduction of hybrid imaging modalities (echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography, and fluoroscopy). In conclusion, this paper summarizes the etiopathogenesis, clinical characteristics, diagnosis, and treatment of mitral PVLs. (Anatol J Cardiol 2020; 24: 350-60)

The utility of 3D printed models in complex percutaneous paravalvular leak interventions

Paravalvular leaks (PVL) are seen in 5–17% of patients after surgical mitral and aortic valve replacement. This is usually well-tolerated in the majority of patients; however, up to 5% will require re-intervention due to either hemodynamically significant regurgitation or hemolysis requiring repeated blood transfusion. Transcatheter closure of PVLs is becoming the treatment of choice in many patients owing to the high risk of redo surgery, high rates of recurrence with the surgical approach, and substantial improvements in device technology and growing expertise in structural heart disease interventions. Careful selection of the appropriate candidates by the Heart Team with in-depth analysis of clinical and multimodality imaging data is critical to ensuring good short- and long-term outcomes¹.

The defect is usually oval/crescentic and often serpiginous in nature, which poses significant challenges in choosing the optimal size and number of devices to implant - especially with large size defects. Generally, defects involving more than 25–30% of the sewing ring are deemed unsuitable for percutaneous closure. While the Amplatzer family of vascular plugs (e.g. AVP3 and AVP2) is commonly used for percutaneous closure of PVLs, there are currently no approved dedicated devices for this indication, except the paravalvular leak device (Occlutech) which is not universally available. Small and relatively circular defects can usually be closed using a single plug, conventionally utilizing a size that is 25–30% larger than the mean diameter of the defect. Larger and crescentic defects on the other hand frequently require more than one plug and can be quite challenging in terms of choosing the appropriate size(s)².

We report two cases with very large defects with irregular shape in which 3D printed modeling was extremely useful for bench testing to optimize the number and sizes of devices to be implanted.