Feasibility of Shockwave Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Calcified Coronary Stenoses

The Role of Calcified Nodules in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Diagnosis and Management

Calcified nodules (CNs) are increasingly recognized as critical contributors to the pathophysiology of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of the recent literature, focusing on the prevalence of CNs, their underlying mechanisms, and their implications for the clinical management of coronary artery disease (CAD). CNs are characterized by unique pathophysiological processes, and the diagnosis and treatment of CNs during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) underscore the importance of advanced intravascular imaging techniques, such as optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), for precise identification and prognostic evaluation. Current therapeutic strategies aim to modulate CN characteristics, enhance arterial wall stability, and reduce the risk of ACS and sudden cardiac death. This review highlights the impact of CNs in ACS, the role of intravascular imaging in diagnosis, and the importance of targeted interventions to improve clinical outcomes, as by bridging diagnostic insights with emerging atherectomy modalities, this review also seeks to advance the understanding and management of CNs in PCI, fostering improved patient outcomes.

'RotaShock' - A Revolution in Calcium Modification: Long-term Follow-up from a Single High-volume Centre

Background

Rotational atherectomy (RA) and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) are well-established technologies for modification of coronary calcification. Given their contrasting mechanisms of action, there has been interest in whether the use of these devices in conjunction could potentially be synergistic and offer improved procedural results. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the efficacy, procedural safety and long-term outcomes of combining RA and IVL, termed 'RotaShock' (RSK), for the treatment of severe coronary calcification.

Methods

A single- centre retrospective analysis was carried out of consecutive patients treated with an RSK strategy for coronary calcification from January 2019 until September 2022. Baseline demographics, comorbidity details, details of the percutaneous coronary intervention procedure, angiographic and/or intracoronary imaging (ICI) results and presence of target vessel revascularisation or mortality were recorded.

Results

A total of 36 patients were treated with RSK; the majority of patients were male (n=29; 80.6%) and the median age was 75 years (IQR 70-79 years). The majority of cases involved treating the left anterior descending artery (63.4%) but one-third involved percutaneous coronary intervention to the left main coronary artery. The vast majority of cases were guided by ICI (88.9%) and were performed through radial access (80.6%). In patients with ICI available for analysis, the median minimum stent area was 7.7 mm2 (IQR 6.2-10.0 mm2). There were two access site complications but no other periprocedural complications. The median follow-up was 942 days (IQR 645-1,306 days). Despite the high complexity of lesions treated, follow-up identified only two cases of target vessel revascularisation. There were five cases of non-adjudicated all-cause mortality.

Conclusion

RSK is an effective and safe strategy for modification of severe coronary calcification, with long-term results suggesting a highly durable result. Further and randomised data are now mandated to evaluate the relative merits of RSK compared with RA or IVL alone.

Advances in intravascular lithotripsy: mechanisms, devices, and clinical applications

INTRODUCTION

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) complicates endovascular interventions due to vascular calcifications, which compromise procedural success and long-term outcomes. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) represents a promising innovation to modify calcified lesions with shockwaves, addressing unmet clinical needs.

AREAS COVERED

This review explores the mechanisms, devices, and clinical applications of IVL in PAD treatment. It highlights the limitations of conventional approaches (high-pressure balloons, specialty balloons, atherectomy), which often result in suboptimal lesion preparation and procedural complications. Particular emphasis is placed on the combination of atherectomy and IVL, as well as the various IVL devices available and in development, beyond those from Shockwave Medical. Additionally, we discuss future perspectives, including drug penetration enhancement and the issue of post-IVL recoil. Additionally, the literature review methodology, encompassing searches in PubMed and Embase, from January 2008 to December 2023, is briefly outlined.

EXPERT OPINION

IVL offers a safe, effective, and innovative approach to treating calcified lesions while preserving surrounding tissues. However, the current evidence, mainly derived from industry-funded studies, is limited by heterogeneous calcification classifications and a lack of long-term outcome data. Independent research is essential to define IVL's role in PAD treatment algorithms, especially regarding its cost-effectiveness and long-term primary patency outcomes.

From Mechanisms to Management: Tackling In-Stent Restenosis in the Drug-Eluting Stent Era

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Drug-eluting stent (DES) technology has greatly enhanced the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The aim of the present paper is to provide a comprehensive review of in-stent restenosis (ISR), focusing on the contemporary DES era, including its incidence, mechanisms, and imaging characterization.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite the widespread use of DES and numerous improvements, recent clinical data indicate that ISR still occurs in 5-10% of PCI procedures, posing a considerable public health issue. The incidence, morphology, and clinical implications of ISR are determined by a complex interplay of several factors: the patient, stent, procedure, and vessel and lesion-related factors. Advancements in intracoronary imaging have provided greater insight into its patterns and underlying causes. Over time, treatment strategies have evolved, and current guidelines recommend an individualized approach using intracoronary imaging to characterize ISR's underlying substrate.

The Safety and Efficacy of Intravascular Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Severe Coronary Artery Calcification in 261 Cases: A Retrospective Study

Background

Coronary artery calcification is strongly linked to factors such as advanced age, dyslipidemia, and chronic kidney disease. Severe coronary artery calcification significantly elevates the complexity and risk of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), potentially giving rise to complications such as incomplete stent expansion, restenosis, and thrombosis. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL), a novel approach, can break up calcified plaques and facilitate stent delivery and expansion. Nevertheless, its comprehensive safety and efficacy in pretreating severe coronary artery calcification lesions remain uncertain, and research data is relatively scarce compared to traditional techniques, especially in the large hospital setting of Henan with a considerable population base.

Aims

To retrospectively analyze the safety and efficacy of IVL in the treatment of severe coronary artery calcification in 261 cases.

Methods

From January 2022 to March 2024, 261 patients with at least one coronary artery lesion diagnosed as severe calcification and undergoing PCI based on IVL in Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital and Henan Provincial People's Hospital were selected for the study. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 272 diseased vessels treated with IVL for PCI. The primary endpoint was procedural success, while the main safety endpoints were no cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization within 30 days.

Results

Among the 261 patients, 234 (89.7%) had acute coronary syndrome (ACS), including 195 (74.7%) with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Various techniques like noncompliant balloon, cutting balloon, and orbital grinding were employed for IVL preparation, and the proportion of direct IVL treatment was 8.8% (24 cases). The minimum lumen area significantly increased from (1.5 ± 0.6) mm² before treatment to (7.2 ± 1.8) mm² after treatment, with an acute gain rate of (243 ± 105)%, (p < 0.001), indicating a statistically significant difference. The primary efficacy endpoint was achieved 100%, and the primary safety endpoint was 2.6%. Perioperative complications were infrequent and were managed successfully.

Conclusions

As a new technology for modifying calcified plaques, the IVL system proves to be safe, effective, and straightforward to operate, offering a new and preferred option for patients with severe coronary calcified lesions, particularly those with ACS.

Impact of lesion preparation-induced calcified plaque defects in vascular intervention for atherosclerotic disease: in silico assessment

Percutaneous coronary interventions in highly calcified atherosclerotic lesions are challenging due to the high mechanical stiffness that significantly restricts stent expansion. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel vessel preparation technique with the potential to improve interventional outcomes by inducing microscopic and macroscopic cracks to enhance stent expansion. However, the exact mechanism of action for IVL is poorly understood, and it remains unclear whether the improvement in-stent expansion is caused by either the macro-cracks allowing the vessel to open or the micro-cracks altering the bulk material properties. In silico models offer a robust means to examine (a) diverse lesion morphologies, (b) a range of lesion modifications to address these deficiencies, and (c) the correlation between calcium morphology alteration and improved stenting outcomes. These models also help identify which lesions would benefit the most from IVL. In this study, we develop an in silico model of stent expansion to study the effect of macro-crack morphology on interventional outcomes in clinically inspired geometries. Larger IVL-induced defects promote more post-stent lumen gain. IVL seems to induce better stenting outcomes for large calcified lesions. IVL defects that split calcified plaque in two parts are the most beneficial for stenting angioplasty, regardless of the calcified plaque size. Location of the IVL defect does not seem to matter with respect to lumen gain. These findings underscore the potential of IVL to enhance lesion compliance and improve clinical outcomes in PCI. The macroscopic defects induced by IVL seem to have a substantial impact on post-stent outcomes.

Intravascular Lithotripsy for Coronary Artery Calcification: An Expert Review

Coronary artery calcification is an impediment to percutaneous coronary interventions by obstructing the device pathway or stent deployment. To facilitate percutaneous coronary intervention in such complex lesions, high-pressure balloon dilations, atherectomy procedures, and specialty balloons are used but they all come with considerable limitations and periprocedural complications like dissection and perforation. To surpass these disadvantages, intravascular lithotripsy was introduced which acts by delivering high-pressure pulsatile sonic waves circumferentially thereby destroying the calcium deposits. It is a safe and effective treatment modality in treating severe coronary artery calcification and facilitating stent delivery with minimal complications.

Calcified plaque modification during percutaneous coronary revascularization

The presence and severity of calcified coronary plaque negatively impacts angiographic and clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Severe coronary calcification is associated with suboptimal stent delivery, deployment, apposition and expansion which can lead to in-stent restenosis and/or thrombosis. Severe coronary calcification is associated with incremental hazard for adverse clinical events, including death, during 5-10 years following PCI despite the use of new generation drug- eluting stents. Multiple technologies including high-pressure noncompliant and modified (cutting/scoring) balloons, atheroablative technologies (laser, rotational or orbital atherectomy), and more recently, intravascular lithotripsy have been used to modify calcified plaque and facilitate optimal coronary stent implantation. Intravascular imaging is critically important to determine the extent and distribution (superficial or deep) of coronary calcification and to aid selection and sequence for use of calcium modifying technologies. Unfortunately, large scale randomized comparative trials of calcium modifying technologies are limited and the relative safety and effectiveness of these modalities is poorly defined. Recent mechanistic and clinical data supporting the use of plaque modifying technologies are reviewed to provide insights into their optimal use.

Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Vessel Preparation Techniques With Plain Balloon Angioplasty, Atherectomy, or Intravascular Lithotripsy Before Application of a Drug Coated Balloon to Treat Atherosclerotic Femoropopliteal Disease

OBJECTIVE

To compare one year outcomes after atherectomy, intravascular lithotripsy vs. plain balloon angioplasty before application of drug coated balloons for treating femoropopliteal atherosclerotic disease.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were screened until May 2023 for randomised controlled trials.

REVIEW METHODS

This was a systematic review and network meta-analysis. The inclusion criteria were patients with claudication and those with critical limb threatening ischaemia with lesion characteristics of all lengths, stenosis, calcification, and occlusions. The primary outcome was freedom from target lesion re-intervention at one year. Secondary outcomes were rate of bailout stenting, major amputation, and all cause mortality at one year. Pooled point estimates were calculated with a standard random effects model. Further sensitivity analyses were completed with a mixed treatment Bayesian model. Risk of bias was assessed by the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2 (RoB2) and certainty of evidence assessed via the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.

RESULTS

Four RCTs comprising 549 patients (two studies evaluating directional atherectomy, one evaluating rotational atherectomy, one evaluating intravascular lithotripsy against plain balloon angioplasty) were included. The weighted mean length of femoropopliteal lesions was 103.4 ± 6.67 mm. Results of the mixed treatment Bayesian analysis were consistent with pooled analysis for all outcomes. There were no significant differences in freedom from target lesion revascularisation (GRADE, high) (RoB2, low), major amputation (GRADE, low), or mortality (GRADE, moderate). Bailout stenting rates were significantly reduced with intravascular lithotripsy and atherectomy compared with plain balloon angioplasty (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 - 0.89) (GRADE, moderate) (RoB2, low).

CONCLUSION

This review found that intravascular lithotripsy or atherectomy did not appear to incur a statistically significant advantage in freedom from target lesion revascularisation, major amputation, or mortality rate at one year. There was moderate certainty of evidence that bailout stenting is significantly reduced after vessel preparation with intravascular lithotripsy and atherectomy.

Intravascular lithotripsy prior to transcarotid arterial revascularization: A technical tale of two cases

calcific carotid stenosis is becoming more common as the advanced-age population grows, requiring new therapeutic approaches. As such, transcarotid arterial revascularization is gaining significant popularity in the management of carotid stenosis due to low rates of perioperative complications and optimal clinical outcomes. In addition, intravascular lithotripsy has shown promise in safely facilitating the success of endovascular procedures in the context of calcified lesions. The combination of neuroprotective technology offered by transcarotid arterial revascularization and circumferential plaque remodeling by intravascular lithotripsy has been utilized for complex lesions. We present two cases of symptomatic calcific carotid stenosis treated with intravascular lithotripsy before transcarotid arterial revascularization. A 4 × 40 mm lithotripsy balloon delivered shockwaves at two and four atmospheres over a 0.014 wire. Transcarotid arterial revascularization was successfully completed without complications, and luminal patency was observed in both patients. Calcific carotid stenosis was effectively treated with intravascular lithotripsy before transcarotid arterial revascularization, resulting in optimal safety and clinical recovery. Thus, when combined with novel shockwave technology, the neuroprotective effect of flow reversal in transcarotid arterial revascularization procedures demonstrates promise in maintaining safety while providing a novel treatment technique for high-risk patients with calcific cervical internal carotid artery stenosis.

Rota-Tripsy or step-up-approach rotational atherectomy for severe coronary artery calcification treatment: a comparative effectiveness study

Step-up-approach rotational atherectomy has been widely recognized in the treatment of severe calcified plaques. As an alternative, the rota-tripsy procedure is a novel strategy for the modification of calcification lesions. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of rota-tripsy and step-up-approach rotational atherectomy, given the limited clinical data available. Clinical data of 3652 patients with coronary calcification were retrospectively collected from February 2021 to February 2024. The cases were divided into two groups based on the technical approach. The primary efficacy endpoint was procedural success (stent expansion rate > 70% and no hospital major adverse cardiac events [MACEs]). The primary safety endpoint was the absence of serious angiographic complications and 30 days MACEs. A total of 37 patients (38 calcified lesions) screened and included in the study, with 18 cases (19 lesions) in group A and 19 cases in group B. The results showed no significant differences in primary efficacy endpoint. However, group A recorded a lower incidence of angiographic complications (P = 0.02) and shorter dose area product and fluoroscopy/interval times compared with group B (P < 0.01). For management of severe coronary calcification, both rota-tripsy and step-up-approach rotational atherectomy had favorable short-term clinical results; however, rota-tripsy provided improved safety and efficiency.

Study on the use of intravascular ultrasound-guided coronary intravascular lithotripsy compared with rotational atherectomy: a single-center, retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided coronary intravascular lithotripsy and rotational atherectomy in treating severe coronary artery calcification.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 60 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention at the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University from October 2022 to August 2023 was conducted. The patients were divided into two groups: 30 received IVUS-guided coronary intravascular lithotripsy and 30 underwent IVUS-guided rotational atherectomy. The primary endpoints comprised angiographic thrombolysis in myocardial infarction III flow and <30% stenosis post-percutaneous coronary intervention, and IVUS metrics, such as >80% stent expansion, avoiding high plaque burden or lipid-rich plaques, minimizing malapposition <0.4 mm/1 mm, and preventing tissue prolapse and dissection. Safety was assessed by complications and 1- and 6-month postoperative major adverse cardiovascular event rates.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint was achieved in both groups. The treatment efficacy was 100% in all cases. At 1 and 6 months post-procedure, there was no significant difference in major adverse cardiovascular events, acute myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

IVUS-guided coronary intravascular lithotripsy is a safe and effective alternative to rotational atherectomy, potentially reducing certain complications.

Equity in Modifying Plaque of Women With Undertreated Calcified Coronary Artery Disease: Design and Rationale of EMPOWER CAD study

Background

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death for women, yet they remain underrepresented in interventional CAD studies. Women have been shown to be at increased risk of mortality and major adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The poorer outcomes are likely because women are typically diagnosed with CAD late, at an older age, with more comorbidities, and with more challenging anatomy including smaller vessels and higher prevalence of coronary artery calcification.

Methods

The EMPOWER CAD study (NCT05755711) is a postmarket, prospective, multicenter, single-arm observational study of the Shockwave Coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) system for the treatment of women with calcified coronary artery disease. The study will enroll 400 female patients referred for PCI with coronary IVL and stenting. The primary safety end point is target lesion failure (TLF) at 30 days, defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. The primary effectiveness end point is procedural success, defined as stent delivery with a residual in-stent stenosis ≤30% in all target lesions and without in-hospital TLF as assessed by an independent core laboratory and clinical events committee. Patients will be followed up for 3 years.

Conclusions

The EMPOWER CAD study will enroll real-world female patients. Adjunctive use of IVL with other calcium modification technologies will be assessed, as well as a subcohort analysis of patients with optical coherence tomography imaging. The EMPOWER CAD study therefore directly addresses the underrepresentation of women in interventional cardiology clinical trials.

A Novel Approach to Calcium Destruction in Coronary and Peripheral Blood Vessels: Intravascular Lithotripsy

Lithotripsy has been used for decades in the treatment of kidney stones and gallstones, in which ultrasound shock waves generated outside of the body are used to physically break up hardened masses. In the past decade, intravascular lithotripsy (IVL), a technology developed by Shockwave Medical Inc. (Santa Clara, CA), has emerged as a novel therapy for the treatment of vascular calcification. In the coronary blood vessels, IVL modifies arterial calcium and enables percutaneous coronary interventions to be performed in a safe and consistent manner, and in the peripheral blood vessels, IVL can be used as a standalone therapy in the treatment of calcified plaque in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Due to the success of the Disrupt CAD and Disrupt PAD clinical trials, IVL is now FDA-approved in the United States for use in both patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and PAD. The widespread adoption of IVL for PAD is likely to mirror the swift uptake seen in CAD. Although questions remain regarding IVL's high cost and performance compared directly to other technologies such as atherectomy, its ease of use, speed, and safety makes its future extremely promising for the treatment of complex, heavily calcified lesions in both peripheral and coronary vessels. Despite this, more studies are certainly needed to determine in what clinical scenarios IVL should be considered as opposed to atherectomy and if there are types of calcified lesions where IVL is best utilized (ie, concentric vs eccentric).

[Coronary calcified and resistant lesions angioplasty in the outpatient, myth or reality?]

Progress in coronary angioplasty has enabled outpatients treatment with rates of immediate complications below 1%. This shows a clear improvement in patient's comfort and it represents an important medical and economic gain. Considering the demographic evolution of the population, there is an increasing number of calcified coronary lesions which represent, according to the series, up to a quarter of angioplasties. However, their care is more delicate with a greater risk of complications and procedural failure. In fact, with the difficulties of crossing and with the vascular intrusions related to pre-dilation or sub-dilation stent deployment, the complication risk increases by almost 10% in these cases of angioplasties. Similarly, the death rate at 30 days goes from 4.7% in angioplasty in general up to 24.4% in calcified lesions. Several devices for atherectomy and plaque preparation have been developed in order to better overcome the lesions and better prepare the stent installation at the cost of a risk of complications between 2 and 10%. The three most frequent complications are dissection (1.8 to 7%), slow/no-flow (0.1 to 3%) and coronary perforation (0.2 to 4%). Nevertheless, despite this procedural increased risk, ambulatory angioplasty of calcified complex lesions can become a reality subject to 4-6 hours monitoring in a specialized unit with dedicated protocols.

Staged strategy of combined rotational atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy for severely calcified lesions: an evaluation using multimodality intracoronary imaging-a case report

Background

Severely calcified lesions are the most significant challenge for percutaneous coronary intervention, exhibiting poor clinical outcomes. Some severely calcified lesions remain untreatable with conventional balloons or even atherectomy devices. Intravascular lithotripsy is a new option for treating severe calcification.

Case summary

Herein, we describe a case of ischaemic cardiomyopathy with a thick, circumferential calcified lesion in the proximal and mid-segments of the left anterior descending coronary artery. In the first session, high-pressure balloons, cutting balloons, and rotational atherectomy failed to disrupt the calcification. In the staged additional treatment that was subsequently planned, eight cycles of intravascular lithotripsy created multiple fractures in the deep calcification, resulting in successful stent deployment. The effect of intravascular lithotripsy was observed mainly in calcified areas with lipid components detected using near-infrared spectroscopy-intravascular ultrasound.

Discussion

Our report suggests the efficacy of employing a combined strategy of rotational atherectomy with small burrs and intravascular lithotripsy in the treatment of severe calcification with a minimal risk of complications. Our study introduces a novel aspect by utilizing near-infrared spectroscopy-intravascular ultrasound to evaluate calcified lesions before performing intravascular lithotripsy. To our knowledge, there have been no similar reports to date. The effect of intravascular lithotripsy on calcified lesions may be related to the distribution of lipid components and/or heterogeneity within the calcification.

Safety, efficacy, and optical coherence tomography insights into intravascular lithotripsy for the modification of non-eruptive calcified nodules: A prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Non-eruptive calcium nodules (CNs) are commonly seen in heavily calcified coronary artery disease. They are the most difficult subset for modification, and may result in stent damage, malapposition and under-expansion. There are only limited options available for non-eruptive CN modification. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is being explored as a potentially safe and effective modality in these lesions.

AIMS

This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of the use of IVL for the modification of non-eruptive CNs. The study also explored the OCT features of calcium nodule modification by IVL.

METHODS

This is a single-center, prospective, observational study in which patients with angiographic heavy calcification and non-eruptive CN on OCT and undergoing PCI were enrolled. The primary safety endpoint was freedom from perforation, no-reflow/slow flow, flow-limiting dissection after IVL therapy, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during hospitalization and at 30 days. MACE was defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). The primary efficacy endpoint was procedural success, defined as residual diameter stenosis of <30% on angiography and stent expansion of more than 80% as assessed by OCT.

RESULTS

A total of 21 patients with 54 non-eruptive CNs undergoing PCI were prospectively enrolled in the study. Before IVL, OCT revealed a mean calcium score of 3.7 ± 0.5 and a mean MLA at CN of 3.9 ± 2.1 mm2. Following IVL, OCT revealed calcium fractures in 40 out of 54 (74.1%) CNs with an average of 1.05 ± 0.72 fractures per CN. Fractures were predominantly observed at the base of the CN (80%). Post IVL, the mean MLA at CN increased to 4.9 ± 2.3 mm2. After PCI, the mean MSA at the CN was 7.9 ± 2.5 mm2. Optimal stent expansion (stent expansion >80%) at the CN was achieved in 85.71% of patients. All patients remained free from MACE during hospitalization and at the 30-day follow-up. At 1-year follow-up, all-cause death had occurred in 3 (14.3%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This single-arm study demonstrated the safety, efficacy, and utility of the IVL in a subset of patients with non-eruptive calcified nodules. In this study, minimal procedural complications, excellent lesion modifications, and favorable 30-day and 1-year outcomes were observed.

Successful calcium modification of a large calcified nodule using shockwave intravascular lithotripsy in the setting of acute coronary syndrome: a case report

Background

Calcified nodules are associated with suboptimal preparation before stenting due to challenging crossing and unsuccessful pre-dilation and calcium cracking with conventional balloons. In this scenario, we report the use of shockwave intravascular lithotripsy for the successful lesion preparation of an undilatable and challenging calcified nodule in a patient presenting with ACS.

Case summary

We report a case of a 79-year-old male patient presented with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. Coronary angiography revealed 90% stenosis in the proximal segment of the right coronary artery, with a hazy area of inhomogeneous contrast. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging identified a large eccentric calcified nodule, with a minimum luminal area (MLA) of 4.18 mm2. Rotablation was done with a ROTAPRO Atherectomy System, post-rotablation IVUS showed no plaque modification. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) was performed with the emission of 50 pulses. Post-IVL, IVUS showed that the calcium nodule was successfully cracked with increased MLA to 6.8 mm2. The lesion was pre-dilated with a cutting balloon and stented using a SYNERGY MEGATRON stent and post-dilated with a non-compliant balloon with good final angiographic result and TIMI Grade 3 flow. Post-stenting IVUS confirmed optimal stent apposition and expansion with an MLA of 11.9 mm2.

Discussion

In severely calcified lesions, like calcified nodules, lesion preparation before stenting is pivotal for optimal long-term outcomes. As demonstrated in this case, IVL can be used safely in the setting of ACS not only to treat superficial and deep calcium layers but also to crack a large, calcified nodule, after failure of rotablation.

Vascular Calcification: Where is the Cure?

With the progress of aging, the incidence of vascular calcification (VC) gradually increases, which is correlated with cardiovascular events and all-cause death, aggravating global clinical burden. Over the past several decades, accumulating approaches targeting the underlying pathogenesis of VC have provided some possibilities for the treatment of VC. Unfortunately, none of the current interventions have achieved clinical effectiveness on reversing or curing VC. The purpose of this review is to make a summary of novel perspectives on the interventions of VC and provide reference for clinical decision-making.

Comparison of intravascular lithotripsy and rotational atherectomy for the treatment of heavily calcified coronary lesions: the STIFF ( S tenoses with calcificaTIon treated with angioplasty e FF ected with dedicated interventional tools) study

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous coronary interventions in heavily calcified coronary lesions are associated with technical difficulties and the worse prognosis. Lesion preparation is important to reduce complications and improve outcomes. The aim of this study is to compare the results of rotational atherectomy (RA) and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) at achieving optimal stent implantation using intravascular ultrasound criteria.

METHODS

Retrospective, single-center study comparing patients with heavily calcified coronary lesions that underwent percutaneous coronary interventions using RA or IVL.

RESULTS IN TOTAL

25 patients (13 in the RA group and 12 in the IVL group) were included. Reference vessel diameter was similar between the groups [2.59 (2.51-3.63) mm in the RA group vs. 2.79 (2.59-3.16) mm in the IVL group; P  = 0.89], as were minimal lumen area [1.02 (0.80-1.23) mm vs. 1.40 (1.01-1.40) mm; P  = 0.43] and diameter stenosis [60.4% (52.3-72.3) vs. 56.1% (47.8-61.3); P  = 0.56). The final minimal lumen area was significantly larger in the IVL group [7.6 mm 2 (5.8-8.6) vs. 5.4 mm 2 (4.5-6.2); P  = 0.01] as were lumen area gain [4.1 mm 2 (2.6-5.9) vs. 2.3 mm 2 (1.4-3.6); P  = 0.01] and final stent volume [491.2 mm 3 (372.2-729.8) vs. 326.2 mm 3 (257.1-435.4); P  = 0.03]. In the RA group, 69.2% of the patients achieved the preestablished intravascular ultrasound-based criteria for successful stent implantation, vs. 100% of the patients in the IVL group ( P  = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Patients in the IVL group achieved the Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Angiography-Guided Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation trial criteria of successful stent implantation more frequently than those treated with RA.

Calcified coronary lesions: Imaging, prognosis, preparation and treatment state of the art review

Calcific coronary artery stenosis is a complex disease associated with adverse outcomes and suboptimal percutaneous treatment. Calcium plaque modification has emerged as a key strategy to tackle the issues that accompany calcific stenosis - namely reduced device deliverability, unpredictable lesion characteristics, and difficult dilatation. Atherectomy has traditionally been the treatment modality of choice for heavily calcified coronary stenoses. Contemporary technologies have emerged to aid with planning, preparation, and treatment of calcified coronary stenosis in an attempt to improve procedural success and long-term outcomes. In this State Of The Art Review, we synthesize the body of data surrounding the diagnosis, imaging, and treatment of calcific coronary disease, with a focus on i) intravascular imaging, ii) calcific lesion preparation, iii) treatment modalities including atherectomy, and iv) updated treatment algorithms for the management of calcified coronary stenosis.

Effectiveness and Safety of a Novel Intravascular Lithotripsy System for Severe Coronary Calcification: The CALCI-CRACK Trial

BACKGROUND

Intravascular lithotripsy is effective and safe for managing coronary calcification; however, available devices are limited, and complex lesions have been excluded in previous studies. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of a novel intravascular lithotripsy system for severe calcification in a population with complex lesions.

METHODS

CALCI-CRACK (treatment of severe calcified coronary lesions with a novel intracoronary shock wave lithotripsy system) (ChiCTR2100052058) was a prospective, single-arm, multicentre study. The primary end point was the procedural success rate. Major safety end points included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and target lesion failure (TLF) at 30 days and 6 months, and severe angiographic complications. Calcification morphology was assessed in the optical coherence tomography (OCT) subgroup.

RESULTS

In total, 242 patients from 15 high-volume Chinese centres were enrolled, including 26.45% of patients with true bifurcation lesions, 3.31% with severely tortuous vessels, and 2.48% with chronic total occlusion, respectively. The procedural success rate was 95.04% (95% confidence interval 91.50%-97.41%), exceeding the prespecified performance goal of 83.4% (P < 0.001). The 30-day and 6-month MACE rates were 4.13% and 4.55%, respectively. TLF rates at those time points were 1.24% and 1.65%, respectively. Severe angiographic complications occurred in 0.42% of patients. In the OCT subgroup (n = 93), 93.55% of calcified lesions were fractured, and minimal lumen area increased from 1.55 ± 0.55 mm2 to 4.91 ± 1.22 mm2 after stent implantation, with acute gain rate of 245 ± 102%.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel intravascular lithotripsy system is effective and safe for managing severely calcified coronary lesions in a cohort that included true bifurcation lesions, severely tortuous vessels, and chronic total occlusion.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR), number ChiCTR2100052058.

Successful use of lithoplasty for re-expansion of covered iliac stents with unilateral occlusion

BACKGROUND

Vessel wall calcification is associated with stent under-expansion and in-stent restenosis. The traditional approaches to treat peripheral artery calcification are percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and atherectomy. Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) uses sonic wave pressure to disrupt calcium of the severely calcified lesions. Published reports of IVL to treat in-stent restenosis are limited to coronary interventions and bare metal platforms.

METHODS

We describe the case of a 55-year-old male with extremely compressed under-expanded covered stents associated with severe wall calcification that resulted in stent occlusion.

RESULTS

The IVL system balloon was deployed uneventfully, in a phased manner. Bilateral bare metal stents were also placed in a kissing fashion to further re-expand the arterial segments. Reintervention with IVL facilitated successful revascularization and the stent remained patent at 24 months.

CONCLUSION

Our case highlights the use of IVL as an effective tool in the management of vessel wall calcification both for primary and secondary interventions.

Intravascular Lithotripsy: Approach to Advanced Calcified Coronary Artery Lesions, Current Understanding, and What Could Possibly Be Studied Next

Calcified and resistant narrowing of arteries poses significant difficulty in performing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), as they increase the risk of subpar outcomes leading to worse clinical outcomes. Despite the existence of dedicated technologies and devices, including various balloons and atherectomy systems, they often do not ensure sufficient plaque modification and ideal vessel preparation for optimal stent deployment. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL), a technology originally developed for urological procedures, has recently been used to safely and selectively disrupt calcified depositions in both peripheral and coronary arteries by sonic waves that seamlessly transfer to nearby tissue, enhancing vessel compliance with minimal impact on soft tissues. In the coronary arteries, the use of IVL plays a role in the process of "vessel preparation" before the placement of stents, which is crucial for restoring blood flow in patients with severe coronary artery disease (CAD), and is considered a minimally invasive technique, reducing the need for open heart surgeries and associated risks and complications. Studies have shown that IVL can lead to improved procedural success rates and favorable long-term outcomes for patients with severely calcified coronary artery disease. With the advent of IVL, the disruption of severe calcification of coronary artery and stenotic lesions before stent implantations can be performed. Despite promising data for treating calcified lesions, IVL is significantly underutilized in clinical practice, long-term clinical data and extensive research are needed to validate its further safety and efficacy. In this article, we reviewed the literature discussing the use of IVL in the coronary arteries as an approach for addressing intravascular atherosclerotic plaques, particularly focusing on heavily calcified plaques that are resistant to standard initial PCI, while also evaluating its safety in comparison to alternative methods.

Dedicated Balloon Techniques for Coronary Calcium Modification

Coronary calcification represents a significant technical challenge in percutaneous coronary intervention and is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Fortunately, a number of balloon-assisted technologies are available to aid in the management of coronary calcification before stenting. Adequate lesion preparation is crucial in the successful management of calcified coronary lesions. Balloon-based techniques can be a safe and effective method of lesion preparation and, as such, are an integral part of an interventionalist's armamentarium. In this mini-review, we focus on the use of non-compliant balloons, super high-pressure non-compliant balloons, cutting balloons, scoring balloons and intravascular lithotripsy.

Contemporary Trends and Outcomes of Intravascular Lithotripsy in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From BMC2

BACKGROUND

With an aging population and an increase in the comorbidity burden of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the management of coronary calcification for optimal PCI is critical in contemporary practice.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to examine the trends and outcomes of coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL), rotational/orbital atherectomy, or both among patients who underwent PCI in Michigan.

METHODS

We included all PCIs between January 1, 2021, and June 30, 2022, performed at 48 Michigan hospitals. Outcomes included in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and procedural success.

RESULTS

IVL was used in 1,090 patients (2.57%), atherectomy was used in 1,743 (4.10%) patients, and both were used in 240 patients (0.57% of all PCIs). IVL use increased from 0.04% of PCI cases in January 2021 to 4.28% of cases in June 2022, ultimately exceeding the rate of atherectomy use. The rate of MACEs (4.3% vs 5.4%; P = 0.23) and procedural success (89.4% vs 89.1%; P = 0.88) were similar among patients treated with IVL compared with atherectomy, respectively. Only 15.6% of patients treated with IVL in contemporary practice were similar to the population enrolled in the pivotal IVL trials. Among such patients (n = 169), the rate of MACEs (0.0%) and procedural success (94.7%) were similar to the outcomes reported in the pivotal IVL trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Since its introduction in February 2021, coronary IVL use has steadily increased, exceeding atherectomy use in Michigan by February 2022. Contemporary use of IVL and atherectomy is generally associated with high rates of procedural success and low rates of complications.

Coronary intravascular lithotripsy for severe coronary artery calcification: The Disrupt CAD I-IV trials

Coronary artery calcification (CAC) severity is associated with increased vessel inflammation, atherosclerosis, stent failure, and risk of percutaneous coronary intervention-related complications. Current modalities for CAC modification include atherectomy techniques (rotational, orbital, and laser) and balloon modification (cutting and scoring). However, these methods are limited by their risk of slow flow/no reflow, coronary dissection, perforation, and myocardial infarction. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) emits high-energy sonic waves that induce calcium fractures within a target lesion to improve vessel compliance for stent placement. Low rates of major cardiac adverse events (MACE) and high rates of procedural and angiographic success were observed with IVL in the Disrupt CAD I-IV trials. Optical coherence tomography sub-studies identified calcium fracture as the likely etiology of improved vessel compliance and increased luminal diameter post-IVL. Rates of MACE, procedural, and angiographic success were consistent across the Disrupt CAD trials, suggesting IVL is less operator-dependent compared to other calcium-modifying techniques. Coronary IVL offers interventional cardiologists a safe and effective method of severe CAC modification, while providing reproducible outcomes.

Current applications, procedural and 1-year outcomes of Rotatripsy for the treatment of calcified coronary lesions

BACKGROUND

Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) combined with rotational atherectomy (RA), known as Rotatripsy, is used to treat severe coronary artery calcification (CAC), though data on efficacy, midterm safety and use sequence is limited. We aimed to identify indicators for Rotatripsy use and to assess its safety and success rates, both acutely and at 1-year follow-up.

METHODS

Patients undergoing Rotatripsy for severe CAC across six centers from May 2019 to December 2023 were included. Demographic, clinical, procedural and follow-up data were collected. Efficacy endpoints included device success (delivery of the RA-burr and IVL-balloon across the target lesion and administration of therapy without related complications), technical success (TIMI 3 flow and residual stenosis <30% by quantitative coronary analysis) and procedural success [composite of technical success with absence of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: cardiac death, myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularization). Safety endpoints comprised Rotatripsy-related complications and MACE at 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 114 patients (75 ± 9 years, 78% male) underwent Rotatripsy for 120 lesions. In the majority of procedures RA was followed by IVL, mostly electively (n = 68, 57%) but also for balloon underexpansion (n = 37, 31%) and stent crossing failure (n = 1, 1%). Diverse and complex target lesions were addressed with an average SYNTAX score of 24.6 ± 13.0. Device, technical and procedural success were 97%, 94% and 93%, respectively. Therapy-related complications included two (2%) coronary perforations, one (1%) coronary dissection and one (1%) burr entrapment. At 1-year follow-up(present in 77(67%) patients), MACE occurred in 7(9%) cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Over a 1-year follow-up period, Rotatripsy was safe and effective, predominantly using RA electively before IVL.

A comparative study of shockwave intravascular lithotripsy and conventional percutaneous coronary intervention in the treatment of severe coronary artery calcification lesions

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) in the treatment of severe coronary artery calcification (CAC) lesions.

METHODS

In this study, we selected patients diagnosed with severe CAC lesions confirmed by coronary angiography (CAG) who were hospitalized in Yulin First People's Hospital between December 2021 and December 2022 and required percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Using a random number table, we divided all patients into the IVL group and the PCI group in the order of interventional therapy. We compared both groups in terms of the surgical success rate, intraoperative manipulation characteristics, procedural complication, and cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).

RESULTS

(1) There were no differences in the surgical success rate, incidence of MACE, and occurrence of procedural complication between the two groups; (2) Compared with the conventional PCI group, patients in the IVL group used fewer predilatation balloons, and the difference was statistically significant (all P < 0.05); (3) Compared with the conventional PCI group, patients in the IVL group had lesser surgery time and lesser radiation time, with lesser proportion of patients who were assisted with stent implantation using coronary artery rotational atherectomy, and this difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05); (4) The mean stent diameter and length in the IVL group was greater than those in the conventional PCI group but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In this study, we found that IVL was a highly safe and effective procedure in the treatment of severe CAC lesions that did not increase the surgery and radiation time, and it could also reduce the use of predilatation balloons, thus improving the management of CAC lesions. Thus, IVL can be a novel choice in treating severe CAC lesions.

Comparison of long-term outcome in patients with in-stent restenosis treated with intravascular lithotripsy or with modified balloon angioplasty

BACKGROUND

Modified balloon angioplasty (MB) using a cutting-/scoring balloon or intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is used in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). However, IVL is an off-label use in this setting. The aim of this subgroup analysis of an all-comers registry was to compare IVL to MB angioplasty in patients with ISR.

METHODS

The subgroup (n = 117) included all patients with an ISR treated by MB or IVL between 2019 and 2021. Primary endpoint was strategy success (< 20% residual stenosis). The secondary endpoint was cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and target lesion failure/revascularization (TVR). Quantitative coronary angiography was performed in all patients.

RESULTS

A total of n = 36 patients were treated by IVL and n = 81 patients by MB. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed between the groups. The primary endpoint was reached in 99 patients (84.6%). Patients in the IVL group had less residual stenosis (2.8% vs. 21.0%; p = 0.012). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that IVL had a significant positive effect on reaching the primary end point (Estimate 2.857; standard error (SE) 1.166; p = 0.014). During the follow-up period (450 days) there were no significant differences in rates of cardiac death (IVL n = 2 (1.7%) vs. MB n = 3 (2.6%); p = 0.643), AMI (IVL n = 2 (1.7%) vs. MB n = 4 (3.4%); p = 0.999) and TVR (IVL n = 5 (4.3%) vs. MB n = 14 (12%); p = 0.851).

CONCLUSION

IVL results in a significantly lower rate of residual stenosis than MB in patients with ISR. During the long-term follow-up, no differences in rates of cardiac death, AMI or TVR were observed.

Use of Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy in Recanalization of Calcified Visceral and Renal Arteries: A Case Report and Update of the Literature

PURPOSE

Calcifications of the visceral and renal arteries lead to chronic mesenteric ischemia and renal artery stenosis, and both open and endovascular treatments can be proposed. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has emerged as a novel technique used in peripheral and coronary interventions.

CASE REPORT

A 73-year-old man presented with chronic postprandial abdominal pain and weight loss. Computed-tomography-angiography (CTA) showed 93% calcified stenosis of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA). The plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) was affected by immediate recoiling. The patient underwent ShockwaveTM IVL of the SMA via brachial access and stent-graft implantation. At 3-months follow-up, the patient showed symptoms resolution.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of Shockwave IVL can be an effective treatment for severely calcified SMA stenosis. A similar approach can be employed in both celiac and renal arteries as reported in 11 cases in literature and herein summarized. Intravascular lithotripsy resulted in high technical success and uneventful follow-up. However, given the small number of patients reported, larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

CLINICAL IMPACT

This article reports a case of recanalization of superior mesenteric artery with heavily calcified lesion treated with intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) with Shockwave™ Intravascular Lithotripsy Balloon (Shockwave Medical Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). Beside, for the first time, we summarize the Literature on the use of IVL in the renal and visceral arteries district, providing indications, applications and useful hints for the endovascular treatment of chronic mesenteric ischemia and renal artery stenosis. This preliminary data show straightforward applicability, high technical success, and uneventful follow-up and IVL can be proposed as an useful tool for challenging revascularization of heavily calcified reno-visceral arteries.

Extension of interval between adjacent pulse delivery cycles to deal with myocardial ischemia by intravascular lithotripsy: case report

BACKGROUND

Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) represents a novel approach in the management of coronary calcification. This technique employs acoustic pressure waves, generated by a shockwave balloon, to effectively fracture both superficial and deep calcification in situ. The efficacy and safety of IVL have been convincingly demonstrated through the Disrupt CAD I-IV studies. While IVL is associated with the occurrence of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, there is no evidence to indicate it causes myocardial ischemia.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 71-year-old man was admitted presenting with chest pain. His previous coronary angiography revealed stenosis and calcification in the left anterior descending branch. An attempt to predilate the lesion using two Lacrosse non-slip element balloons was unsuccessful. Ventricular premature beats and transient ST-segment depression were captured during the utilization of IVL. The operator gradually extended the pulse emission interval across two consecutive cycles to mitigate myocardial ischemia. Notably, when the interval reached 30s, the patient had no chest pain or ST-segment changes. Subsequent images of intravascular ultrasound confirmed calcification ruptures. Therapeutic intervention included the placement of a stent and the application of a drug-coated balloon in the left anterior descending branch. A telephonic follow-up six months later indicated the patient had no discomfort.

CONCLUSIONS

This case underscores the effectiveness of gradually extending the pulse emission interval as a strategic complement to the clinical application of IVL. In certain clinical scenarios, it may become imperative to suspend the pulse delivery to improve myocardial blood supply.

Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy

Coronary artery calcification is strongly associated with adverse cardiac events and can impede the success of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) due to challenges with delivery of equipment and expansion of stents. Current treatment modalities for mitigation of coronary calcification have limitations and inherent risk of complications. Coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel technique to modify coronary artery calcification via acoustic pressure waves. IVL utilizes an easy-to-use device, which does not require a steep learning curve. Prospective studies have shown this technique to be safe and effective and can be used to adequately modify calcified coronary stenoses in preparation for PCI and stent deployment and optimization. IVL has unique features that can be used alone or as an adjunctive therapy to other available calcium modification tools. As compared to the currently established modalities of calcium modification, IVL has the potential to facilitate successful PCI with fewer serious procedural complications. In this review article, we discuss the importance of coronary artery calcification, the role of IVL, its mechanism, the current clinical data behind its use and future directions. Overall, coronary IVL is a promising technology for the treatment of severely calcified coronary stenoses, with a need for, long-term clinical outcome data of IVL-facilitated PCI.

Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy Effectiveness and Safety in a Real-World Cohort

Background: Coronary artery calcification is a predictor of adverse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a promising tool for the treatment of calcified lesions. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of IVL. Methods: A single-center observational study of PCI procedure, with assessment of the outcomes of patients undergoing PCI using IVL, was performed. Angiographic procedural success was used as the primary effectiveness endpoint. The primary safety endpoint was defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization within 30 days. Results: A total of 111 patients were included. Indications for PCI spanned the spectrum of chronic (53.2%) and acute coronary syndromes (43%). Lesion preparation before IVL was performed with non-compliant (42%), cutting or OPN (14.4%) balloons and with atherectomy techniques in 11% of procedures. Intravascular imaging was used in 21.6% of procedures. The primary effectiveness endpoint was achieved in 100% and the primary safety endpoint in 3.6% of procedures. Peri-procedural complications were minimal and successfully resolved. Conclusions: IVL was an effective and safe technique for the treatment of calcified coronary lesions. These findings contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting the use of IVL in the management of these challenging scenarios.

Efficacy of intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) in coronary stenosis with severe calcification: A multicenter systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

With heavily calcified coronary and peripheral artery lesions, lesion preparation is crucial before stent placement to avoid underexpansion, associated with stent thrombosis or restenosis and patency failure in the long-term. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) technology disrupts superficial and deep calcium by using localized pulsative sonic pressure waves, making it to a promising tool for patients with severe calcification in coronary bed.

AIMS

The aim of the study is to systematically review and summarize available data regarding the safety and efficacy of IVL for lesion preparation in severely calcified coronary arteries before stenting.

METHODS

This study was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. We systematically searched PubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases from their inception to February 23, 2023, for studies assessing the characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing IVL before stent implantation. The diameter of the vessel lumen before and after IVL, as well as stent implantation, were analyzed. The occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was assessed using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis comprised 38 studies including 2977 patients with heavily calcified coronary lesions. The mean age was 72.2 ± 9.1 years, with an overall IVL clinical success of 93% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 91%-95%, I2 = 0%) and procedural success rate of 97% (95% CI: 95%-98%, I2 = 73.7%), while the in-hospital and 30-days incidence of MACE, myocardial infarction (MI), and death were 8% (95% CI: 6%-11%, I2 = 84.5%), 5% (95% CI: 2%-8%, I2 = 85.6%), and 2% (95% CI: 1%-3%, I2 = 69.3%), respectively. There was a significant increase in the vessel diameter (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 2.47, 95% CI: 1.77-3.17, I2 = 96%) and a decrease in diameter stenosis (SMD: -3.44, 95% CI: -4.36 to -2.52, I2 = 97.5%) immediately after IVL application, while it was observed further reduction in diameter stenosis (SMD: -6.57, 95% CI: -7.43 to -5.72, I2 = 95.8%) and increase in the vessel diameter (SMD: 4.37, 95% CI: 3.63-5.12, I2 = 96.7%) and the calculated lumen area (SMD: 3.23, 95% CI: 2.10-4.37, I2 = 98%), after stent implantation. The mean acute luminal gain following IVL and stent implantation was estimated to be 1.27 ± 0.6 and 1.94 ± 1.1 mm, respectively. Periprocedural complications were rare, with just a few cases of perforations, dissection, or no-reflow phenomena recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

IVL seems to be a safe and effective strategy for lesion preparation in severely calcified lesions before stent implantation in coronary arteries. Future prospective studies are now warranted to compare IVL to other lesion preparation strategies.

Procedural and clinical impact of intravascular lithotripsy for the treatment of peri-stent calcification

BACKGROUND

Use of intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) for treating peri-stent calcification is increasing. However, this indication remains 'off-label'. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and clinical outcomes of in-stent IVL.

METHODS

Patients from five European centers who underwent in-stent IVL were included between 2019 and 2023. Demographic, clinical, procedural and follow-up data were collected from electronic hospital records. Angiographic and intracoronary imaging (ICI) data were analyzed in a centralized core-laboratory.

RESULTS

Of 101 patients (71.2 ± 9.2 years), 56(55 %) received in-stent IVL for late stent failure (median 109 days post-PCI) due to calcific neoatherosclerosis or extra-stent calcification(late-IVL), while 45(45 %) underwent bail-out IVL due to stent infraexpasion (immediate-IVL). Both late-IVL and immediate-IVL significantly improved angiographic %diameter stenosis (73.7[59.6-89.8]% to 16.4 [10.4-26.9]%;p < 0.0001 and 28.6[22.5-43.3]% to 14.1[10.3-29.4]%;p < 0.0001, and minimum lumen area (MLA) (3.4 ± 1.2 to 8.6 ± 2.5 mm2;p < 0.002 and 5.4 ± 1.9 to 7.3 ± 1.9;p < 0.0001).Device(98 %) and procedural success(80 %) were high. MACE rates in-hospital (2 %), 30-days (3 %),6-months(5 %) and 1-year(7 %) were low and comparable in both groups. Acute diameter gain was lower in immediate-IVL (2.1 ± 0.7 mm vs. 0.5 ± 0.4 mm;p < 0.0001). This, however, was explained by significant differences in pre-IVL angiographic and ICI parameters (%diameter stenosis 73.7[59.6-89.8] vs. 28.6[22.5-43.3]%; p < 0.0001 and MLA (3.4 ± 1.2 vs 5.4 ± 1.9 mm2; p < 0.0001), whereas post-IVL percentage diameter stenosis (16.4(10.4-26.9) vs. 14.1(10.3-29.4);p = 0.914) and MLA (8.6 ± 2.5vs. 7.4 ± 1.9 mm2;p = 0.064) in late- and immediate-IVL were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

IVL in-stent due to peri-stent calcification is an effective strategy, both late and immediately after stent implantation. Overall, MACE rates at short- and mid-term were low and comparable in both groups, although clinical findings should be taken with caution.

ShOckwave ballooN or Atherectomy with Rotablation in calcified coronary artery lesions: Design and rationale of the SONAR trial

BACKGROUND

The percutaneous treatment of calcified coronary lesions remains challenging and is associated with worse clinical outcomes. In addition, coronary artery calcification is associated with more frequent peri-procedural myocardial infarction.

STUDY DESIGN AND OBJECTIVES

The ShOckwave ballooN or Atherectomy with Rotablation in calcified coronary artery lesions (SONAR) study is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, international, multicenter, open label trial (NCT05208749) comparing a lesion preparation strategy with either shockwave intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) or rotational atherectomy (RA) before drug-eluting stent implantation in 170 patients with moderate to severe calcified coronary lesions. The primary endpoint is difference in the rate of peri-procedural myocardial infarction. Key secondary endpoints include rate of peri-procedural microvascular dysfunction, peri-procedural myocardial injury, descriptive study of IMR measurements in calcified lesions, technical and procedural success, interaction between OCT calcium score and primary endpoint, 30-day and 1-year major adverse clinical events.

CONCLUSIONS

The SONAR trial is the first randomized controlled trial comparing the incidence of peri-procedural myocardial infarction between 2 contemporary calcium modification strategies (Shockwave IVL and RA) in patients with calcified coronary artery lesions. Furthermore, for the first time, the incidence of peri-procedural microvascular dysfunction after Shockwave IVL and RA will be evaluated and compared.

A Prospective, Multicenter, Real-World Registry of Coronary Lithotripsy in Calcified Coronary Arteries: The REPLICA-EPIC18 Study

BACKGROUND

Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has demonstrated effectiveness in the treatment of calcified lesions in selected patients with stable coronary disease.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to assess the performance of coronary IVL in calcified coronary lesions in a real-life, all comers, setting.

METHODS

The REPLICA-EPIC18 study prospectively enrolled consecutive patients treated with IVL in 26 centers in Spain. An independent core laboratory performed the angiographic analysis and event adjudication. The primary effectiveness endpoint assessed procedural success (successful IVL delivery, final diameter stenosis <20%, and absence of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE]). The primary safety endpoint measured freedom from MACE at 30 days. A predefined substudy compared outcomes between acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) patients.

RESULTS

426 patients (456 lesions) were included, 63% of the patients presenting with ACS. IVL delivery was successful in 99% of cases. Before IVL, 49% of lesions were considered undilatable. The primary effectiveness endpoint was achieved in 66% of patients, with similar rates among CCS patients (68%) and ACS patients (65%). Likewise, there were no significant differences in angiographic success after IVL between CCS and ACS patients. The rate of MACE at 30 days (primary safety endpoint) was 3% (1% in CCS and 5% in ACS patients [P = 0.073]).

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary IVL proved to be a feasible and safe procedure in a "real-life" setting, effectively facilitating stent implantation in severely calcified lesions. Patients with ACS on admission showed similar angiographic success rates but showed a trend toward higher 30-day MACE compared with patients with CCS. (REPLICA-EPIC18 study [Registry of Coronary Lithotripsy in Spain]; NCT04298307).

Intravascular lithotripsy: A novel option for severe calcification of coronary artery

BACKGROUND

Severe coronary artery calcification is associated with low success rate of interventional operation, perioperative adverse cardiac events, and poor prognosis, which is a major problem faced by operators. The existing therapy methods all have inherent limitations, such as unsatisfactory balloon crossability, inadequate balloon dilation, and so on. The emergence of intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has brought the dawn of the treatment of calcified lesions by using unfocused acoustic pressure waves to fracture calcification in situ. And IVL is the only technology capable of targeting deep calcification.

HYPOTHESIS

IVL may have great clinical application values and potential prospects.

METHOD

Based on the existing clinical evidence of IVL and traditional treatment ways, this review discusses the safety and efficacy of IVL. Combined with clinical practice, the precautions and coping strategies of IVL are analyzed. And the review improves the management algorithm of coronary calcification.

RESULTS

IVL has extremely high safety and effectiveness for severe coronary calcification compared with other ways, and structural improvements of IVL will further expand its value.

CONCLUSIONS

The emergence of IVL could set off a revolution in the treatment of coronary artery calcification.

Coronary intravascular lithotripsy in contemporary practice: challenges and opportunities in coronary intervention

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of calcified coronary arteries is associated with poor outcomes. Poorly modified calcified lesion hinders the stent delivery, disrupts drug-carrying polymer, impairs drug elution kinetics and results in under-expanded stent (UES). UES is the most common cause of acute stent thrombosis and in-stent restenosis after PCI of calcified lesions. Angiography has poor sensitivity for recognition and quantification of coronary calcium, thereby mandating the use of intravascular imaging. Intravascular imaging, like intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography, has the potential to accurately identify and quantify the coronary calcium and to guide appropriate modification device before stent placement. Available options for the modification of calcified plaque include modified balloons (cutting balloon, scoring balloon and high-pressure balloon), atherectomy devices (rotational atherectomy and orbital atherectomy) and laser atherectomy. Coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is the newest addition to the tool box for calcified plaque modification. It produces the acoustic shockwaves, which interact with the coronary calcium to cause multiplanar fractures. These calcium fractures increase the vessel compliance and result in desirable minimum stent areas. Coronary IVL has established its safety and efficacy for calcified lesion in series of Disrupt CAD trials. Its advantages over atherectomy devices include ease of use on workhorse wire, ability to modify deep calcium, no debris embolization causing slow flow or no-flow and minimal thermal injury. It is showing promising results in modification of difficult calcified lesion subsets such as calcified nodule, calcified left main bifurcation lesions and chronic total occlusion. In this review, authors will summarize the mechanism of action for IVL, its role in contemporary practice, evidence available for its use, its advantages over atherectomy devices and its imaging insight in different calcified lesion scenarios.

Intravascular lithotripsy for severe coronary calcification: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Coronary artery calcification remains a challenge in percutaneous coronary interventions, due to the higher risk of suboptimal result with subsequent poor clinical outcomes. Intravascular lithotripsy is a novel way of treating severe coronary calcification as it has the ability to modify calcium both circumferentially as well as transmurally, facilitating stent expansion and apposition. We conducted a systematic overview of the published literature on intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) assessing the efficacy and feasibility of IVL in treating severe coronary calcification.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Of the retrieved publications, 62 met our inclusion criteria and were included. A total of 1389 patients (1414 lesions) with significant coronary calcification or under-expanded stents underwent IVL.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The mean age was 72.03 years (74.7% male). There was a significant improvement in acute and sustained vessel patency, with mean minimal lumen diameter of 2.78±0.46 mm, resulting in acute gain of 1.72±0.51 mm. The acute procedural success rate was 78.2 to 100% with in-hospital complication rate of 5.6 to 7.0%. The majority of the studies reported 30-day MACE, which was between 2.2 to 7.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

The recent studies have highlighted that the use of IVL with adjuvant intracoronary imaging has revolutionized the way of treating heavily calcified, non-dilatable coronary lesions and is likely to succeed the conventional ways of treating these complex lesions. We need further studies to gauge the long-term efficacy and safety of IVL against techniques currently available for calcium modification including conventional balloons, cutting or scoring balloons, rotational atherectomy and laser atherectomy.

Rotational Atherectomy, Orbital Atherectomy, and Intravascular Lithotripsy Comparison for Calcified Coronary Lesions

In order to improve the percutaneous treatment of coronary artery calcifications (CAC) before stent implantation, methods such as rotational atherectomy (RA), orbital atherectomy (OA), and coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) were invented. These techniques use different mechanisms of action and therefore have various short- and long-term outcomes. IVL employs sonic waves to modify CAC, whereas RA and OA use a rapidly rotating burr or crown. These methods have specific advantages and limitations, regarding their cost-efficiency, the movement of the device, their usefulness given the individual anatomy of both the lesion and the vessel, and the risk of specified complications. This study reviews the key findings of peer-reviewed articles available on Google Scholar with the keywords RA, OA, and IVL. Based on the collected data, successful stent delivery was assessed as 97.7% for OA, 92.4% for IVL, and 92.5% for RA, and 30-day prevalence of MACE (Major Adverse Cardiac Events) in OA-10.4%, IVL-7.2%, and RA-5%. There were no significant differences in the 1-year MACE. Compared to RA, OA and IVL are cost-effective approaches, but this is substantially dependent on the reimbursement system of the particular country. There is no standard method of CAC modification; therefore, a tailor-made approach is required.

Clinical outcomes of coronary intravascular lithotripsy in patients with stent failure (COIL registry)

BACKGROUND

Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has been demonstrated to be an effective treatment of calcified de novo coronary lesions. Safety data on the use of IVL within stented segments are lacking. We sought to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and long-term outcomes of IVL in patients with stent failure.

METHODS

This was a retrospective multi-centre registry that included consecutive patients with stent failure who had undergone IVL treatment. The primary efficacy endpoint was procedural success defined as residual stenosis <30% (determined by quantitative coronary angiography analysis) in patients who survived hospital admission without in-hospital adverse events. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were defined as the composite endpoints of cardiovascular death, spontaneous myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularisation at one-year follow up.

RESULTS

102 patients were included in this study. Mean age was 73 ± 9 years and 81% were male. The duration from previous stent implantation and IVL treatment was 24 (interquartile range 7-76) months, of which 10.8% received IVL for acute under-expanded stent. IVL treatment allowed significant improvement in both minimal lumen diameter (1.14 ± 0.60 to 2.53 ± 0.59, P < 0.001) and degree of stenosis (66.8 ± 19.9 to 20.3 ± 11.3%, P < 0.001). The rate of procedural success was 78.4% (80/102 of patients). The one-year MACE was 15.7%. Ostial disease (HR 5.16; 95% CI 1.19 to 22.33; P = 0.028) and lesion length (HR 1.05; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.10; P = 0.010) were independently associated with one-year MACE.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with stent failure, IVL is a safe and feasible treatment for this high-risk group.

Management strategies for heavily calcified coronary stenoses: an EAPCI clinical consensus statement in collaboration with the EURO4C-PCR group

Since the publication of the 2015 EAPCI consensus on rotational atherectomy, the number of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) performed in patients with severely calcified coronary artery disease has grown substantially. This has been prompted on one side by the clinical demand for the continuous increase in life expectancy, the sustained expansion of the primary PCI networks worldwide, and the routine performance of revascularization procedures in elderly patients; on the other side, the availability of new and dedicated technologies such as orbital atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy, as well as the optimization of the rotational atherectomy system, has increased operators' confidence in attempting more challenging PCI. This current EAPCI clinical consensus statement prepared in collaboration with the EURO4C-PCR group describes the comprehensive management of patients with heavily calcified coronary stenoses, starting with how to use non-invasive and invasive imaging to assess calcium burden and inform procedural planning. Objective and practical guidance is provided on the selection of the optimal interventional tool and technique based on the specific calcium morphology and anatomic location. Finally, the specific clinical implications of treating these patients are considered, including the prevention and management of complications and the importance of adequate training and education.

Intravascular lithotripsy compared to rotational atherectomy for the treatment of calcified distal left main coronary artery disease: A single center experience

BACKGROUND

The safety and efficacy of intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) for the treatment of calcified distal left main (LM) disease remains unclear, especially compared to rotational atherectomy (RA).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the baseline clinical, angiographic, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) characteristics and procedural outcomes of 107 patients who underwent distal LM percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with IVL (with or without adjunct atherectomy) versus RA alone for plaque modification before stenting at a single center between 2020 and 2022.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients underwent calcium modification with IVL with or without adjunct atherectomy and 57 with RA only. The mean age was 73 years and with a high prevalence of diabetes (58.9%), chronic kidney disease (42.1%), prior revascularization (coronary artery bypass graft surgery [36.4%] or prior PCI [32.7%]). Acute coronary syndrome was the primary indication for PCI in over 50% of the patients in both groups. Medina 1-1-1 LM bifurcation disease was identified in 64% and 60% of the IVL and RA groups (p = 0.64) respectively. Final minimum stent area in distal LM (>8.2 mm2 ), ostial LAD (>6.3 mm2 ) and ostial LCX (>5.0 mm2 ) were achieved in 96%, 85% and 89% of cases treated with IVL respectively and 93%, 93% and 100% of cases treated with RA respectively (LM p = 1.00; LAD p = 0.62; LCX; p = 1.00 for difference between the two groups). Procedural success (technical success without in-hospital major adverse events) was achieved in 98% of the IVL group and 86% of the RA-only group (p = 0.04). There were eight procedural complications (flow-limiting dissection, perforation, or slow/no-reflow) in the RA group compared to four in the IVL group (NS), and one patient in the RA required salvaged mechanical support compared to none in the IVL group.

CONCLUSION

Plaque modification with coronary IVL appears to be efficacious and safe for the treatment of severely calcified distal LM lesions compared to RA only. Larger randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy for Treatment of Severely Calcified Lesions: Long-Term Sex-Specific Outcomes

Background

Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) for calcified lesion preparation prior to drug-eluting stent placement has high procedural success and safety, especially in women, whereas other atheroablative approaches are associated with increased procedural complications. We sought to investigate long-term sex-based outcomes of IVL-facilitated stenting.

Methods

We performed a patient-level pooled analysis of the single-arm Disrupt CAD III and IV studies. Patient baseline, procedural characteristics, and outcomes were examined according to sex at 30 days and 1 year. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac events (a composite of cardiac death, all myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization). Target lesion failure was defined as cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization.

Results

A total of 448 patients, 106 (24%) women, were included. Women were older and less likely to be smokers. Women had smaller reference vessel diameters (2.8 mm vs 3.1 mm), shorter lesion length (23.6 mm vs 27.1 mm), and shorter total calcified length (44.4 mm vs 49.3 mm) compared with men. Post-IVL angiographic outcomes and complications were similar between women and men. At 1 year, major adverse cardiac event rates (12.3% vs 13.2%, P = .52) were not different between women and men. There were no differences between women and men (10.4% vs 11.2%; P = .43) in target lesion failure at 1 year.

Conclusions

Use of IVL in the treatment of severely calcified lesions is associated with low rates of adverse clinical events and with similar safety and effectiveness in women and men at 1 year.

Coronary intravascular lithotripsy and rotational atherectomy for severely calcified stenosis: Results from the ROTA.shock trial

BACKGROUND

Severely calcified coronary lesions present a particular challenge for percutaneous coronary intervention.

AIMS

The aim of this randomized study was to determine whether coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is non-inferior to rotational atherectomy (RA) regarding minimal stent area (MSA).

METHODS

The randomized, prospective non-inferiority ROTA.shock trial enrolled 70 patients between July 2019 and November 2021. Patients were randomly (1:1) assigned to undergo either IVL or RA before percutaneous coronary intervention of severely calcified coronary lesions. Optical coherence tomography was performed at the end of the procedure for primary endpoint analysis.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint MSA was lower but non-inferior after IVL (mean: 6.10 mm2 , 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 5.32-6.87 mm2 ) versus RA (6.60 mm2 , 95% CI: 5.66-7.54 mm2 ; difference in MSA: -0.50 mm2 , 95% CI: -1.52-0.52 mm2 ; non-inferiority margin: -1.60 mm2 ). Stent expansion was similar (RA: 0.83 ± 0.10 vs. IVL: 0.82 ± 0.11; p = 0.79). There were no significant differences regarding contrast media consumption (RA: 183.1 ± 68.8 vs. IVL: 163.3 ± 55.0 mL; p = 0.47), radiation dose (RA: 7269 ± 11288 vs. IVL: 5010 ± 4140 cGy cm2 ; p = 0.68), and procedure time (RA: 79.5 ± 34.5 vs. IVL: 66.0 ± 19.4 min; p = 0.18).

CONCLUSION

IVL is non-inferior regarding MSA and results in a similar stent expansion in a random comparison with RA. Procedure time, contrast volume, and dose-area product do not differ significantly.

[France LILI (Intracoronary Lithoplasty)]

BACKGROUND

Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel and appealing device for the preparation of coronary calcified lesions before stenting. This technology has received CE mark and FDA approval, according to the data of the CAD studies. However, these clinical trials show numerous limits as the exclusion of a subset of lesions (Left main, CTO, in stent restenosis …) and patients' over-selection. In this view, applications of IVL results in daily practice are debatable according to the lack of evidence in unselected patients.

METHODS

FRANCE-LILI is a prospective national academic registry evaluating the safety and effectiveness of adjunctive intravascular lithotripsy in coronary angioplasty in an all-comers patient population in France. The registry is registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov database (NCT05113407) and managed by the French Coronary Atheroma and Interventional Cardiology Group (GACI) of the French Society of Cardiology (FSC). France LILI will prospectively enroll 500 subjects. The primary endpoint is target vessel failure (TVF) at one year, defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) according to the Academic Research Consortium-2 (ARC-2) definition (except for an MI clearly attributed to a non-target vessel) and revascularization of the target vessel. All endpoints are evaluated and confirmed by an independent adjudication committee.

CONCLUSION

This national prospective academic registry will provide fruitful data on IVL in an unselected population of complex coronary lesions.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Including 354 Patients from 13 Studies of Intravascular Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Underexpanded Coronary Stents

Calcified coronary plaque (CCP) represents a challenging scenario for interventional cardiologists. Stent underexpansion (SU), often associated with CCP, can predispose to stent thrombosis and in-stent restenosis. To date, SU with heavily CCP can be addressed using very high-/high-pressure noncompliant balloons, off-label rotational atherectomy/orbital atherectomy, excimer laser atherectomy, and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL). In this meta-analysis, we investigated the success rate of IVL for the treatment of SU because of CCP. Studies and case-based experiences reporting on the use of IVL strategy for treatment of SU were included. The primary end point was IVL strategy success, defined as the adequate expansion of the underexpanded stent. A metanalysis was performed for the main focuses to calculate the proportions of procedural success rates with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Random-effects models weighted by inverse variance were used because of clinical heterogeneity. This meta-analysis included 13 studies with 354 patients. The mean age was 71.3 years (95% CI 64.9 to 73.1), and 77% (95% CI 71.2% to 82.4%) were male. The mean follow-up time was 2.6 months (95% CI 1 to 15.3). Strategy success was seen in 88.7% (95% CI 82.3 to 95.1) of patients. The mean minimal stent area was reported in 6 studies, the pre-IVL value was 3.4 mm2 (95% CI 3 to 3.8), and the post-IVL value was 6.9 mm2 (95% CI 6.5 to 7.4). The mean diameter stenosis (percentage) was reported in 7 studies, the pre-IVL value was 69.4% (95% CI 60.7 to 78.2), and the post-IVL value was 14.6% (95% CI 11.1 to 18). The rate of intraprocedural complications was 1.6% (95% CI 0.3 to 2.9). In conclusion, the "stent-through" IVL plaque modification technique is a safe tool to treat SU caused by CCP, with a high success rate and a very low incidence of complications.

Early experience of intravascular lithotripsy in unprotected calcified left main coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Treatment of unprotected severely calcified left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease is a complex interventional procedure. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) and rotational atherectomy (RA) are safe and effective methods of treating coronary calcification in the non-LMCA setting. This retrospective analysis assessed the feasibility of IVL versus RA in unprotected LMCA disease.

METHODS

We analyzed IVL and RA procedures performed at a large tertiary hospital in the Northeast of England from January 1, 2019 to April 31, 2022. Major safety and efficacy endpoints were procedural and angiographic success, defined by stent delivery with <50 % residual stenosis and without clinical or angiographic complications, respectively. Another important clinical endpoint was the composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1 year.

RESULTS

From 242 patients, 44 had LMCA IVL, 81 had LMCA RA and 117 had non-LMCA IVL. Patients with LMCA disease were older and more likely to have aortic stenosis. IVL was a second-line or bailout technique in 86.4 % LMCA and 92.2 % non-LMCA cases. Procedural and angiographic success rates were ≥ 84 % across all groups (p > 0.05). In 3 LMCA IVL and 3 LMCA RA cases arrhythmias and cardiac tamponade complicated the procedures respectively. At 1 year, MACE occurred in 10/44 (22.7 %) LMCA IVL, 16/81 (19.8 %) LMCA RA and 25/117 (21.4 %) cases (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In our single center retrospective analysis, IVL is feasible in unprotected calcified LMCA as a second-line and third-line adjuvant calcium modification technique. Its use in unprotected calcified LMCA disease should be formalized with the undertaking of large randomized controlled trials.