Screening for Fabry Disease in Male Patients With Arrhythmia Requiring a Pacemaker or an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator

Rare Genetic Variants in Young Adults Requiring Pacemaker Implantation

BACKGROUND

Genetic disease has recently emerged as a cause of cardiac conduction disorders (CCDs), but the diagnostic yield of genetic testing and the contribution of the different genes to CCD is still unsettled.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the diagnostic yield of genetic testing in young adults with CCD of unknown etiology requiring pacemaker implantation. We also studied the prevalence of rare protein-altering variants across individual genes and functional gene groups.

METHODS

We performed whole exome sequencing in 150 patients with CCD of unknown etiology who had permanent pacemaker implanted at age ≤60 years at 14 Spanish hospitals. Prevalence of rare protein-altering variants in patients with CCD was compared with a reference population of 115,522 individuals from gnomAD database (control subjects).

RESULTS

Among 39 prioritized genes, patients with CCD had more rare protein-altering variants than control subjects (OR: 2.39; 95% CI: 1.75-3.33). Significant enrichment of rare variants in patients with CCD was observed in all functional gene groups except in the desmosomal genes group. Rare variants in the nuclear envelope genes group exhibited the strongest association with CCD (OR: 6.77; 95% CI: 3.71-13.87). Of note, rare variants in sarcomeric genes were also enriched (OR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.05-3.10). An actionable genetic variant was detected in 21 patients (14%), with LMNA being the most frequently involved gene (4.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Unrecognized rare genetic variants increase the risk of CCD in young adults with CCD of unknown etiology. Genetic testing should be performed in patients age ≤60 years with CCD of unknown etiology. The role of genetic variants in sarcomeric genes as a cause of CCD should be further investigated.

Left ventricular hypertrophy: do not forget Fabry disease. Diagnostic work-up and differential diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy is a common clinical finding. Differential diagnosis includes Fabry disease, a rare and progressive, but treatable storage disease caused by deficiency of α-galactosidase A. However, diagnosis of Fabry is often hampered by its clinical heterogeneity, LV hypertrophy phenocopies and unawareness of the clinician.

METHODS

This review summarises clinical data, family history, electrocardiogram (ECG) and imaging (echocardiogram and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)) characteristics to differentiate aetiologies of LV hypertrophy including clues for the diagnosis of Fabry.

RESULTS

LV hypertrophy is a consequence of pressure overload mostly, but differential diagnosis includes hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and infiltrative diseases. Clinical data, ECG, type and degree of LV hypertrophy, functional and tissue characteristics differ among aetiologies. LV hypertrophy in Fabry is progressive and mostly concentric but may copy any hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Dependent on residual alfa-galactosidase A enzyme activity, degree of LV hypertrophy in Fabry may vary. Initially, low myocardial CMR T1-map values are calculated. At a later stage, midwall late gadolinium enhancement of the inferolateral LV wall may occur. Global longitudinal strain may be depressed in the inferolateral wall. Voltage criteria for LV hypertrophy and short PQ interval are common. Right ventricular (RV) hypertrophy is frequent. In addition, multisystemic symptoms including neuropathic pain, hypohidrosis, proteinuria, renal insufficiency and familial young stroke are pointing to Fabry.

CONCLUSIONS

LV hypertrophy should raise suspicion of Fabry disease, especially if LV hypertrophy is unexplained and/or associated with RV hypertrophy. In Fabry, LV hypertrophy may be heterogeneous and mimic any hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. ECG, multisystemic symptoms and imaging may provide clues for Fabry.

Asn215Ser, Ala143Thr, and Arg112Cys variants in α-galactosidase A protein confer stability loss in Fabry's disease

Alpha galactosidase A (α-GalA) gene contains nine exons localized at the q-arm of the X chromosome. Generally, an α-GalA enzyme is involved in the removal of galactosyl moieties from the glycoproteins and glycolipids. Dysregulation results in the accumulation of glycoproteins as well as glycolipids in various organs leading to Fabry disease (FD). In this study, we examine the impact of Asn215Ser, Ala143Thr and Arg112Cys variants on the α-GalA protein structure contributing to functional dynamic changes in FD. The seven computational pathogenicity prediction methods were used to predict the effects of these variants on the α-GalA protein. The three-dimensional structure of α-GalA variants was modeled with the Swiss Model and Robetta server and validated using a variety of tools. Then, molecular dynamics (MD) simulation was performed to understand the stability and dynamic behavior of the wild-type and variants structures. Most of our analyzed pathogenicity prediction tools showed that Asn215Ser, Ala143Thr and Arg112Cys variants cause a deleterious effect on the α-GalA protein. Further, MD trajectory analysis showed the destabilizing effect of variants on α-GalA structure based on the root mean square deviation, root mean square fluctuation, solvent accessible surface area, the radius of gyration, hydrogen bond, cluster analysis and PCA analysis. This concludes that the presence of these variants could potentially affect the protein functional process of galactosyl moieties removal which might lead to Fabry disease.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

Screening of Fabry disease in patients with an implanted permanent pacemaker

BACKGROUND

Anderson-Fabry disease (AFD) is an X-linked inherited lysosomal disease caused by a defect in the gene encoding lysosomal enzyme α-galactosidase A (GLA). Atrio-ventricular (AV) nodal conduction defects and sinus node dysfunction are common complications of the disease. It is not fully elucidated how frequently AFD is responsible for acquired AV block or sinus node dysfunction and if some AFD patients could manifest primarily with spontaneous bradycardia in general population. The purpose of study was to evaluate the prevalence of AFD in male patients with implanted permanent pacemaker (PM).

METHODS

The prospective multicentric screening in consecutive male patients between 35 and 65 years with implanted PM for acquired third- or second- degree type 2 AV block or symptomatic second- degree type 1 AV block or sinus node dysfunction was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 484 patients (mean age 54 ± 12 years at time of PM implantation) were enrolled to the screening in 12 local sites in Czech Republic. Out of all patients, negative result was found in 481 (99%) subjects. In 3 cases, a GLA variant was found, classified as benign: p.Asp313Tyr, p.D313Y). Pathogenic GLA variants (classical or non-classical form) or variants of unclear significance were not detected.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of pathogenic variants causing AFD in a general population sample with implanted permanent PM for AV conduction defects or sinus node dysfunction seems to be low. Our findings do not advocate a routine screening for AFD in all adult males with clinically significant bradycardia.

Prevalence and predictors of bradyarrhythmias requiring Permanent Pacing in patients with Anderson-Fabry disease

Bradyarrhythmias are an established red flag for storage cardiac conditions including Anderson-Fabry disease (AFD). The prevalence of bradyarrhythmias requiring a pacemaker (PM) and their timing in AFD is unresolved. We evaluated prevalence and predictors of PM requirement in a large AFD cohort, investigating the occurrence of bradyarrhythmias as initial versus late manifestation. We retrospectively evaluated 82 consecutive AFD patients referred to our multidisciplinary referral centre from 1994 to 2020 with a median follow up of 6.9 years, identifying those requiring pacing. Univariable analysis was performed to identify cardiac features associated with PM implantantion. Five of 82 (6%) AFD patients required PM implantation (5/39, i.e. 13% of those with cardiac involvement), always in the context of advanced cardiomyopathy. In none, bradyarrhythmias were the presenting feature. Indications included sick sinus syndrome in 3 patients, advanced atrio-ventricular block in 2 patients. QRS prolongation during follow up strongly correlated with the onset of bradyarrhythmias. Severe bradyarrhythmias are relatively frequent in patients with AFD cardiomyopathy, but do not represent a mode of presentation, occurring late in the disease course and always in the context of advanced cardiac involvement. Monitoring QRS variations over time may help to identify patients requiring pacing. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.