Aspirin and urinary 11-dehydrothromboxane B(2) in African American stroke patients

Aspirin Resistance in Vascular Disease: A Review Highlighting the Critical Need for Improved Point-of-Care Testing and Personalized Therapy

Aspirin resistance describes a phenomenon where patients receiving aspirin therapy do not respond favorably to treatment, and is categorized by continued incidence of adverse cardiovascular events and/or the lack of reduced platelet reactivity. Studies demonstrate that one in four patients with vascular disease are resistant to aspirin therapy, placing them at an almost four-fold increased risk of major adverse limb and adverse cardiovascular events. Despite the increased cardiovascular risk incurred by aspirin resistant patients, strategies to diagnose or overcome this resistance are yet to be clinically validated and integrated. Currently, five unique laboratory assays have shown promise for aspirin resistance testing: Light transmission aggregometry, Platelet Function Analyzer-100, Thromboelastography, Verify Now, and Platelet Works. Newer antiplatelet therapies such as Plavix and Ticagrelor have been tested as an alternative to overcome aspirin resistance (used both in combination with aspirin and alone) but have not proven to be superior to aspirin alone. A recent breakthrough discovery has demonstrated that rivaroxaban, an anticoagulant which functions by inhibiting active Factor X when taken in combination with aspirin, improves outcomes in patients with vascular disease. Current studies are determining how this new regime may benefit those who are considered aspirin resistant.

The Impact of Shift Type on Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Platelet Activation

OBJECTIVE

Rotating shift is known to disrupt circadian rhythms. The 12/24 shift system, with frequent day-night rotations and the ergonomic shift system (ESS), with 90% less rotations were compared for their impacts on oxidative stress, inflammation, and platelet activation by using pentraxin 3 (PTX3), urinary 15-isoprostane F2t, and 11-dehydrotromboxane B2 (11-DTB2).

METHODS

All tests were performed by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Unpaired t test and Pearson correlation analysis were employed.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty 12/24 and 198 ESS workers were included. Plasma PTX3 and urinary 15-isoprostane F2t levels were not different between groups. Urinary 11-DTB2 in 12/24 workers were found significantly higher compared with ESS workers (P < 0.0001). A weak but significant correlation was found between urinary 15-isoprostane F2t and urinary 11-DTB2 levels (r = 0.17, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

12/24 rotating shift was found to cause platelet activation disturbances.

Treatment of bipolar depression with minocycline and/or aspirin: an adaptive, 2×2 double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase IIA clinical trial

Given evidence of chronic inflammation in bipolar disorder (BD), we tested the efficacy of aspirin and minocycline as augmentation therapy for bipolar depression. Ninety-nine depressed outpatients with BD were enrolled in a 6 week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, and randomized to one of four groups: active minocycline (100 mg b.i.d.) + active aspirin (81 mg b.i.d.) (M + A); active minocycline + placebo aspirin (M + P); placebo-minocycline + active aspirin (A + P); and placebo-minocycline + placebo aspirin (P + P). A blinded interim analysis mid-way through the study led to the dropping of the M + P and A + P arms from further enrollment giving numbers per group who were included in the final analysis of: 30 (M + A), 18 (M + P), 19 (A + P), and 28 (P + P). When the study started, there were three primary outcome measures. Based on the results of the interim analysis, the primary outcome variable, response to treatment as defined by >50% decrease in Montgomery-Äsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score was maintained. The other two (i.e., the change in mean MADRS score from baseline to end of study and the remission rate, with remission being defined as a score of <11 on the MADRS) were reduced to exploratory outcome measures because the interim analysis indicated that the study was adequately powered to test differences in response rate but not the mean change in MADRS scores or remission rates. CRP and IL-6 were assayed to measure inflammation. Urinary thromboxane B2 (11-D-TXB₂) concentrations, which were significantly increased at baseline in the combined BD sample (n = 90) vs. a healthy control group (n = 27), served as an indirect marker of cyclooxygenase (COX) activity. In a two-group analysis, the M + A group showed a greater response rate than the P + P group (p(one-tailed) = 0.034, OR = 2.93, NNT = 4.7). When all four arms were included in the analysis, there was a main effect of aspirin on treatment response that was driven by both the M + A and the A + P groups (p(two-tailed) = 0.019, OR = 3.67, NNT = 4.0). Additionally, there was a significant 3-way interaction between aspirin, minocycline, and IL-6, indicating that response to minocycline was significantly greater in participants in the M + P group with higher IL-6 concentrations. Further, participants in the M + P group who responded to treatment had significantly greater decreases in IL-6 levels between baseline and visit 7 vs. non-responders. Regarding the exploratory outcomes, there was a main effect for aspirin on the remission rate (χ₁² = 4.14, p(2t) = 0.04, OR = 2.52, NNT = 8.0). There was no significant main effect of aspirin or minocycline on the mean change in MADRS score across visits. Aspirin and minocycline may be efficacious adjunctive treatments for bipolar depression. Given their potential import, additional studies to confirm and extend these findings are warranted.

Aspirin resistance and ischemic heart disease on Iranian experience

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery disease (CAD) and myocardial infarction are the most common causes of mortality and morbidity all over the world. Aspirin resistance is an important part of therapeutic failure in patients who experience several atherosclerotic events despite aspirin therapy. Different studies have reported aspirin resistance between 5% and 45% all over the world. According to different responses to aspirin therapy in countries and lack of adequate studies on aspirin resistance in Iran, this study was designed for evaluation of aspirin resistance in ischemic patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Total 170 patients with documented coronary artery stenosis with were enrolled in this cross-sectional prospective study. Two cc urine samples were obtained from all the subjects. Then a questionnaire including questions about major risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, obesity and smoking) was completed for each patient. Thromboxane B2 level in urine was measured two times for each patient by one kit of via ELISA method. Gensini modified was usedfor assessment of severity of coronary arteries involvement. Data were analyzed via SPSS 16. with general linear model (univariate).

RESULTS

75.3% of studied patients were aspirin resistant. There was significant relationship between angiography score and aspirin resistance (P<0.001).Our results also showed that aspirin resistance is more common in studied women than men (P=0.003).Significant correlation was observed between diabetes and aspirin resistance in studied subjects (P=0.023).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed aspirin resistance in a sample of Iranian ischemic patients is so prevalent which is higher than other studies in another communities and also aspirin resistance is more common in patients with severe CAD.

How biomarkers will change psychiatry. Part II: Biomarker selection and potential inflammatory markers of depression

Part I of this series defined biomarkers and discussed their current use in general medicine and their potential research and clinical utility in psychiatry. In this second column in the series, the authors first discuss the rationale for selecting a biomarker. The second half of the column discusses the potential use of inflammatory biomarkers in depression, with a specific focus on derivatives of the inflammatory biomarker, thromboxane, to illustrate how biomarkers can be developed for use in clinical practice. In the future, biomarkers are likely to become an integral component of psychiatric treatment, providing information about a patient's odds of developing an illness, the severity of illness, and level of response to therapeutic interventions.

Antiplatelet therapy: aspirin resistance and all that jazz!

Platelets play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, thrombosis, and stroke. Aspirin used alone or in combination with other antiplatelet drugs has been shown to offer significant benefit to patients at high risk of vascular events. Resistance to the action of aspirin may decrease this benefit. Aspirin resistance has been defined by clinical and/or laboratory criteria; however, detection by laboratory methods prior to experiencing a clinical event will likely provide the greatest opportunity for intervention. Numerous laboratory methods with different cutoff points have been used to evaluate the resistance. Noncompliance with aspirin treatment has also confounded studies. A single assay is currently insufficient to establish resistance. Combinations of results to confirm compliance and platelet inhibition may identify "at-risk" individuals who truly have aspirin resistance. The most effective strategy for managing patients with aspirin resistance is unknown; however, studies are currently underway to address this issue.

Functional testing methods for the antiplatelet effects of aspirin

At antiplatelet doses of 75–325 mg/day, aspirin irreversibly inhibits the platelet cyclooxygenase (COX)-1-dependent thromboxane A2 (TXA2) formation. This is the pharmacological mode of action of aspirin, and it can be predicted that if aspirin does not inhibit COX-1 sufficiently, patients will not benefit from its antiplatelet effects. A pharmacodynamic failure of aspirin occurs in 1–2% of patients. The vast majority of atherothrombotic events in patients treated with aspirin result from mechanisms that are dependent on residual (non-COX-1-dependent) platelet reactivity. Global tests of platelet activation in vitro may identify patients with high residual platelet reactivity but are not sufficiently specific to test the pharmacological effect of aspirin. A further problem is the absence of standardized normal ranges for many assays and the fact that different equipment measures different signals, which are also influenced by the agonist and the anticoagulant used. Similar considerations apply for the determination of platelet-derived biomarkers such as circulating P-selectin, soluble CD40 ligand and others. The direct measurement of inhibition of thromboxane-forming capacity is the most specific pharmacological assay for aspirin. However, there is no linear correlation between inhibition of TXA2 formation and inhibition of platelet function. Measurement of urinary levels of the TXB2 metabolite, 11-dehydro-thromboxane B2, represents an index of TXA2 biosynthesis in vivo, but is also sensitive to other cellular sources of TXA2. One general problem of all assays is the relationship with clinical outcome, which is still unclear. Monitoring aspirin treatment by testing platelet function or measuring biomarkers in clinical practice should not be recommended until a clear relationship for the predictive value of these assays for clinical outcome has been established.

Aspirin resistance: disparities and clinical implications

Abstract Aspirin is one of the most widely prescribed drugs for the prevention of thrombosis in patients with vascular disease. Yet, aspirin is unable to prevent thrombosis in all patients. The term "aspirin resistance" has been used to broadly define the failure of aspirin to prevent a thrombotic event. Whether this is directly related to aspirin itself through biochemical aspirin resistance or treatment failure, or if it is because of aspirin's inability to overcome the thrombogenic aspects of the disease process itself, has not been elucidated. This can have dramatic clinical implications for a variety of vascular disease subsets and is cause for concern, considering the high prevalence of aspirin use for both primary and secondary prevention. Disparities exist in the rates of aspirin resistance among certain patient populations, such as women, patients with diabetes mellitus, and those with heart failure, and across clinical conditions, such as cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. Clinical trial data from studies observing resistance have revealed that regardless of study size, dose of aspirin, control for drug interactions and adherence, or assay used to measure platelet function, aspirin resistance is associated with an increased risk for adverse events. Although the evidence is mounting, there has yet to be a consensus on the appropriate clinical response to aspirin resistance.

Aspirin resistance in children with heart disease at risk for thromboembolism: prevalence and possible mechanisms

Aspirin is used to prevent thromboembolism in children with heart disease without evidence supporting its efficacy. Studies in adults report a 5%-51% prevalence of aspirin resistance, yet the mechanisms involved are poorly understood. Our aims were to determine its prevalence in these children and to explore its possible mechanisms. One hundred twenty-three cardiac patients routinely receiving aspirin were prospectively enrolled. Platelet function was measured by Platelet Function Analyzer (PFA)-100 using epinephrine and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) agonists. Aspirin resistance was defined as failure to prolong the epinephrine closure time following aspirin administration. Urine levels of 11-dehydro-thromboxane B(2) (11-dTXB(2)) were measured to determine inhibition of the cyclo-oxygenase pathway. The prevalence of aspirin resistance was 26%. Median ADP closure time was shorter for aspirin-resistant (79.60-115 s) than for aspirin-sensitive (100.60-240 s) patients (p < 0.01). 11-dTXB(2) levels did not correlate with aspirin resistance. Aspirin-resistant patients had higher 11-dTXB(2) levels before (7297 vs. 4160 pg/mg creatinine; p < 0.01) and after (2153 vs. 1412 pg/mg; p = 0.03) aspirin, with a similar percentage decrease in thromboxane (70.5% vs. 66.1%; p = 0.43). Our findings suggest that resistance is not entirely due to lack of inhibition of platelet thromboxane production. Alternative sources of thromboxane and thromboxane-independent mechanisms, such as ADP-induced platelet activation, may contribute to aspirin resistance.

Cytochrome P450 is Responsible for Nitric Oxide Generation from NO-Aspirin and Other Organic Nitrates

Nitric oxide (NO) biotransformation from NO-aspirin (NCX-4016) is not clearly understood. We have previously reported that cytochrome P450 (P450) plays important role in NO generation from other organic nitrates such as nitroglycerin (NTG) and isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN). The present study was designed to elucidate the role of human cytochrome P450 isoforms in NO formation from NCX-4016, using lymphoblast microsomes transfected with cDNA of human P450 or yeast-expressed, purified P450 isoforms. CYP1A2 and CYP2J2, among other isoforms, were strongly related to NO production from NCX-4016. In fact, these isoforms were detected in human coronary endothelial cells. These results suggest that NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase and the P450 system participate in NO formation from NCX-4016, as well as other organic nitrates.

Lack of uniform platelet activation in patients after ischemic stroke and choice of antiplatelet therapy

INTRODUCTION

Platelets play an important role in the natural history of ischemic stroke, and are known to be activated in the acute phase. Although aspirin reduces risks of myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death, the extent of platelet action and the effect of aspirin on platelet function in patients recovering from stroke remain unclear.

METHODS

We studied 120 individuals divided into three equal groups: aspirin-free patients after ischemic stroke, post-stroke patients receiving aspirin (81-650 mg/daily), and aspirin-free subjects with multiple risk factors for vascular disease. Conventional platelet aggregation induced by 5 microM ADP and 5 microM epinephrine, cartridge-based analyzers (Ultegra, and PFA-100) readings, and expression of CD31, CD41a, CD42b, GPIIb/IIIa activity, CD51/CD61, CD62p, CD63, CD107a, CD154, CD165, formation of platelet-monocyte aggregates, intact (SPAN12), and cleaved (WEDE15) PAR-1 thrombin receptors by flow cytometry were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were no differences between aspirin-free post-stroke patients and aspirin-free controls. Although aggregation was slightly higher, 12 out of the 14 receptor analyses, were surprisingly lower in the post-stroke cohort. Aspirin-treated patients exhibited highly significant inhibition of epinephrine-induced aggregation (p=0.0001), prolongation of the closure time (p=0.03), and reduction of the aspirin reactive units (p=0.02) measured by the Ultegra device. In addition, surface platelet expression of thrombospondin (p=0.001), GPIIb/IIIa activity (p=0.04), P-selectin (p=0.03), CD40-ligand (p=0.04), CD165 (p=0.02), the formation of the platelet-monocyte aggregates (p=0.01), and intact epitope of PAR-1 thrombin receptor (p=0.03) were significantly lower in the aspirin-treated group.

CONCLUSIONS

Platelets are not activated in aspirin-free patients after ischemic stroke. Platelet function is significantly inhibited in those treated with aspirin when compared with healthy subjects with risk factors for vascular disease. Bleeding complications and hemorrhagic transformations after aggressive antiplatelet regimens could be related to the decreased or normal baseline platelet characteristics in such patients. Further analysis of platelet heterogeneity and its clinical significance remains to be determined in randomized trials.

Aspirin dosage and thromboxane synthesis in patients with vascular disease

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine whether urinary 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (d-TXB2) is a marker of aspirin resistance and define the relationship between aspirin dosage and concentrations of this thromboxane metabolite.

DESIGN

Randomized, crossover study.

SETTING

Two outpatient clinical centers.

PATIENTS

Forty-eight patients (mean age 70 yrs) with vascular disease (52% clinical coronary artery disease, 29% cerebrovascular disease, 46% atrial fibrillation).

INTERVENTION

Levels of serum thromboxane B2 and d-TXB2 were measured after patients were treated initially with aspirin 325 mg/day for 4 weeks, then again after random assignment to receive aspirin 81, 325, or 1300 mg/day for 4 weeks, and then again after resumption of 325 mg/day for 4 weeks.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

During treatment with aspirin 325 mg/day, the mean +/- SD serum thromboxane B2 level was 0.9 +/- 1.2 ng/ml and median (interquartile range) was 0.4 (0.2-0.9) ng/ml. Mean urinary d-TXB2 was 16 +/- 7.9 ng/mmol creatinine, with a median of 15 (9.9-23) ng/mmol creatinine with aspirin 325 mg/day. After 4 weeks of aspirin 81 mg/day, levels of serum thromboxane B2 (p<0.01) and urinary d-TXB2 (p=0.04) were both significantly higher compared with aspirin 325 mg/day; for urinary d-TXB2, the median increase was 3.0 ng/mmol creatinine. After 4 weeks of treatment with aspirin 1300 mg/day, levels of serum thromboxane B2 (p<0.01) and urinary d-TXB2 (p<0.01) were both significantly lower compared with aspirin 325 mg/day; the median decrease in urinary d-TXB2 was 4.4 ng/mmol creatinine.

CONCLUSION

Different aspirin dosages significantly affect serum and urinary markers of thromboxane synthesis.