Interpretation of Plasma Renin Concentration in Patients Receiving Aliskiren Therapy

Effects of direct renin inhibition versus angiotensin II receptor blockade on angiotensin profiles in non-diabetic chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Direct renin inhibition (DRI) is clinically inferior to other blockers of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). Thus far, the underlying molecular causes of this finding remain unknown.

METHODS

Twenty four patients with non-diabetic chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages III-IV and albuminuria were randomized to DRI or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). Employing a novel mass-spectrometry method, the concentrations of renin, aldosterone and plasma angiotensin peptides [Ang I, Ang II, Ang-(1-7), Ang-(1-5), Ang-(2-8), Ang-(3-8)] were quantified before and after an 8-week treatment.

RESULTS

While blood pressure, renal function and albuminuria decreased comparably in both groups, profound RAS component differences were observed: DRI led to a massive renin increase, while suppressing both vasoconstrictive (Ang I and Ang II) and vasodilatory RAS metabolites (Ang-(1-7) and Ang-(1-5)). In contrast, ARB led to a four-fold increase of Ang I and Ang II, while Ang-(1-7) and Ang-(1-5) increased moderately but significantly. With ARB treatment, a decreased aldosterone-to-Ang II ratio suggested efficacy in blocking AT1 receptor.

CONCLUSIONS

DRI therapy abolishes all RAS effector peptides. ARB increases both vasoconstrictive and vasodilative angiotensins, while this is accompanied by efficient blockade of vasoconstrictive effects. These differential molecular regulations should be considered when selecting optimal antihypertensive and disease-modifying therapy in CKD patients. Key messages Direct renin inhibition leads to a complete and lasting abolition of both classical and alternative RAS components. Angiotensin receptor blockade leads to effective receptor blockade and up-regulation of alternative RAS components. Differential molecular regulations of the RAS should be considered when selecting optimal antihypertensive and disease-modifying therapy in CKD patients.

Aliskiren and the Kidney: Beyond Hypertension

Aliskiren is a novel drug with the ability to lower plasma renin activity, reducing proteinuria in hypertension and in diabetic nephropathy. In primary and secondary glomerular diseases, important causes of endstage kidney disease, proteinuria is a hallmark. Moreover, urinary protein is a marker of renal disease progression. The renin angiotensin-aldosterone system is generally activated in these patients. A complete blockade with the use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers with or without aldosterone receptor blockers is not easy to achieve, and side effects are not uncommon. Plasma renin activity is even increased in patients with this approach. Aliskiren should be considered as a new therapeutic option to be assessed in glomerular diseases, as plasma renin activity can be reduced and a better control of the renin-angiotensin system could be achieved with the consequent reduction in the amount of urinary protein excretion.

The role of direct renin inhibitors in the treatment of the hypertensive diabetic patient

Hypertensive patients with diabetes exhibit an increased risk for cardiovascular complications, such as acute coronary syndrome, stroke, heart failure and chronic kidney disease (CKD). These two chronic diseases are linked to a high rate of morbidity and mortality and for this reason it is important for the clinician to recognize the need for effective treatment of hypertension, which can require combination therapy to achieve blood pressure (BP) goals. Direct renin inhibitors (DRIs) may be useful in combination with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) as they provide a more complete blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), effectively suppressing residual angiotensin II production and the counter-regulatory increase in plasma renin activity observed in patients receiving monotherapy with ACEIs or ARBs. Some questions regarding the action of aliskiren in cardiovascular and renal disorders are open. In particular, the combination therapy of aliskiren and a RAAS blocker in diabetic hypertensive patients with CKD is controversial. Several published studies demonstrated that aliskiren is suitable for once-daily administration and its antihypertensive effect is comparable or superior to that of other antihypertensive agents at recommended doses, with a good tolerability profile. At the moment the association with ACEIs and ARBs is not recommended in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and renal impairment even if a recent published open-label study of low-dose aliskiren (150 mg/daily) in association with ACEIs or ARBs has demonstrated a good tolerability profile without the adverse events found in other studies. This review provides a brief overview of RAAS blocking, in particular the rationale and clinical evidence supporting the use of the DRI aliskiren, in high-risk patients with T2DM.

A comparison of the antihypertensive and anti-inflammatory effects of aliskiren and ramipril add-on therapy in peritoneal dialysis patients--a pilot open label study

Most hypertensive dialysis patients are currently treated with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB). Aliskiren, the direct renin inhibitor, has not been specifically studied in peritoneal dialysis patients. The aim of the study was to compare hypotensive effects of aliskiren and ramipril and their influence on serum potassium and inflammatory parameters in hypertensive peritoneal dialysis patients. Eighteen hypertensive patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis were enrolled in an open-label comparative fixed-order study. The patients had been off RAAS blocking drugs for ≥4 weeks prior to an inclusion. At each of 3 study visits (baseline and after each of the treatment periods) blood pressure, serum lipids, potassium, renin, aldosterone, C-reactive protein (CRP) and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) were measured. After the baseline visit aliskiren was started (150 mg/d) and after 12 weeks replaced with ramipril (5 mg/d) for the next 12 weeks. Blood pressure was 142/88±15/11 mmHg at baseline, 137/84±10/8 mmHg after aliskiren (ns) and 126/81±11/7 mmHg after ramipril (p<0.05 vs baseline and aliskiren). No incidents of hyperkalemia were observed. Plasma renin concentration increased significantly during aliskiren treatment compared to ramipril (227,6±844 vs. 58,3±765 pg/mL). CRP was similar after both therapies (8,8±34 vs. 8,4±32 µg/mL) but MCP-1 concentration was significantly lower after aliskiren than after ramipril (294,0±172,6 vs. 358,9±183,3 pg/mL). Aliskiren 150 mg/day decreases blood pressure less effectively than ramipril 5 mg/day in peritoneal dialysis patients. It does not influence serum potassium. The decrease of MCP-1 concentration after aliskiren treatment may provide an indirect evidence for its blood pressure independent cardioprotective and anti-inflammatory effects.

Aliskiren penetrates adipose and skeletal muscle tissue and reduces renin-angiotensin system activity in obese hypertensive patients

OBJECTIVE

In animals, the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren showed extensive tissue binding in the kidney and long-lasting renal effects. Aliskiren provides prolonged blood pressure-lowering effects following treatment discontinuation in patients. Therefore, we investigated whether aliskiren attains tissue concentrations sufficient to inhibit local renin-angiotensin system (RAS) activity in patients.

METHODS

We included 10 hypertensive patients with abdominal adiposity in an open-label study. Following 1-2 weeks washout, patients received 2 weeks placebo, then 4 weeks aliskiren 300 mg once daily, followed by 4 weeks washout, and then 4 weeks amlodipine 5 mg once daily. Drug concentrations and RAS biomarkers were measured in interstitial fluid using microdialysis and in biopsies from abdominal subcutaneous adipose and skeletal muscle.

RESULTS

We detected aliskiren in all compartments. After 4 weeks of treatment, microdialysate aliskiren concentrations (ng/ml) were 2.4 ± 2.1 (adipose) and 7.1 ± 4.2 (skeletal muscle), similar to plasma concentrations (8.4 ± 4.4); tissue concentrations (ng/g) were 29.0 ± 16.7 (adipose) and 107.3 ± 68.6 (skeletal muscle). Eight weeks after discontinuation, aliskiren was measurable in tissue biopsies but not in plasma or in interstitial fluid. Pooled microdialysate samples from two sets of four patients suggested reduction in tissue angiotensin II with aliskiren but not with amlodipine.

CONCLUSION

In obese hypertensive patients, aliskiren penetrates adipose and skeletal muscle tissue at levels that are apparently sufficient to reduce tissue RAS activity. Furthermore, tissue binding may contribute to aliskiren's prolonged blood pressure-lowering effect following discontinuation.

Aliskiren increases bradykinin and tissue kallikrein mRNA levels in the heart

1. Aliskiren is a renin inhibitor with an IC(50) of 0.6 nmol/L for human renin, 4.5 nmol/L for mouse renin and 80 nmol/L for rat renin. 2. In the present study, we compared the effects of aliskiren (10 mg/kg per day), the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor perindopril (0.2 mg/kg per day) and their combination on angiotensin and bradykinin peptides in female heterozygous (mRen-2)27 rats, transgenic for the mouse renin gene. 3. All three treatments produced similar reductions in systolic blood pressure, heart weight and plasma aldosterone levels and reduced angiotensin II levels in lung, but only perindopril and the combination reduced angiotensin II levels in kidney of (mRen-2)27 rats. In contrast, aliskiren and the combination, but not perindopril alone, increased cardiac bradykinin levels. Aliskiren increased immunostaining for tissue kallikrein in the heart and reduced cardiac fibrosis. 4. We investigated the mechanism underlying the increase in bradykinin levels following aliskiren treatment in Sprague-Dawley rats, in which aliskiren has a lower potency for renin inhibition. Aliskiren (10 mg/kg per day) reduced renal angiotensin levels within 24 h, but treatment for > 24 h was required to increase cardiac bradykinin levels. Moreover, 3 mg/kg per day aliskiren increased cardiac bradykinin levels, but did not reduce renal angiotensin levels. Aliskiren did not potentiate the hypotensive effects of bradykinin; however, it increased tissue kallikrein, but not plasma kallikrein, mRNA levels in the heart. 5. These data demonstrate that the aliskiren-induced increase in cardiac bradykinin levels is independent of renin inhibition and changes in bradykinin metabolism, but is associated with increased tissue kallikrein gene expression.

Aliskiren as a novel therapeutic agent for hypertension and cardio-renal diseases

Objectives

High blood pressure (BP) is a major risk factor for cardiovascular and renal complications. A majority of treated hypertensive patients still complain of high BP. The renin-angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) has been a centre-stage target for all the cardiovascular and cardio-renal complications. Aliskiren, is the first direct renin inhibitor (DRI) to be approved by the US FDA. Renin controls the rate-limiting step in the RAAS cascade and hence is the most favorable target for RAAS suppression.

Key findings

This review article strives to summarize the pharmacokinetic, preclinical and clinical studies done so far pertaining to the efficacy of aliskiren. Further, the pharmacology of aliskiren has been comprehensively dealt with to enhance understanding so as to further research in this unfathomed area in the multitude of cardiovascular disorders and renal diseases.

Summary

Aliskiren has been shown to have comparable BP-lowering effects to other RAAS inhibitors. Recent clinical trials have indicated that it might contribute significantly in combination with other agents for the protection of end-organ diseases.

Aliskiren reduces vascular pathology in diabetic retinopathy and oxygen-induced retinopathy in the transgenic (mRen-2)27 rat

AIM/HYPOTHESIS

We examined whether the renin inhibitor, aliskiren, provides similar or greater protection than ACE inhibition from non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy and from the proliferative neoangiogenesis of oxygen-induced retinopathy.

METHODS

Transgenic (mRen-2)27 rats, which overexpress mouse renin and angiotensin in extra-renal tissues, were studied. For diabetic studies, non-diabetic, diabetic (streptozotocin, 55 mg/kg), diabetic + aliskiren (10 mg kg(-1) day(-1), pump), or diabetic + lisinopril (10 mg kg(-1) day(-1), drinking water) rats were evaluated over 16 weeks. For oxygen-induced retinopathy studies, rats were exposed to 80% oxygen (22 h/day) from postnatal days 0 to 11, and then room air from postnatal days 12 to 18. Aliskiren (10 or 30 mg kg(-1) day(-1), pump) or lisinopril (10 mg kg(-1) day(-1), drinking water) was administered during retinopathy development between postnatal days 12 and 18.

RESULTS

Systolic BP in diabetic (mRen-2)27 rats was reduced with 10 mg kg(-1) day(-1) aliskiren, but only lisinopril normalised systolic blood pressure. In diabetic (mRen-2)27 rats, 10 mg kg(-1) day(-1) aliskiren and lisinopril reduced retinal acellular capillaries and leucostasis to non-diabetic levels. In oxygen-induced retinopathy, neoangiogenesis and retinal inflammation (leucostasis, ED-1 immunolabelling) were partially reduced by 10 mg kg(-1) day(-1) aliskiren and normalised by 30 mg kg(-1) day(-1) aliskiren, whereas lisinopril normalised neoangiogenesis and reduced leucostasis and ED-1 immunolabelling. Aliskiren and lisinopril normalised retinal vascular endothelial growth factor expression; however, only aliskiren reduced intercellular adhesion molecule-1 to control levels.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Aliskiren provided similar or greater retinal protection than ACE inhibition and may be a potential treatment for diabetic retinopathy.

Role of aliskiren in blood pressure control and renoprotection

Patients with chronic renal disease are at increased risk for the development of cardiovascular disease, which is the main cause of death in this growing population. Among the risk factors involved, hypertension and proteinuria are major contributors to kidney damage and, if not controlled, may eventually lead to the progression of renal failure and end-stage renal disease. Both proteinuria and hypertension can be primary pathologic events or can appear as complications of other disease processes. Initially, these two factors may operate separately but, as progression ensues, both processes generally combine, potentiating their effects and hastening renal damage. Therefore, strategies to reduce blood pressure and proteinuria are essential in order to slow the worsening of many nephropathies. Therapies that target the renin-angiotensin system offer particular benefit, as hypertension and proteinuria can be precisely reduced with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and/or angiotensin receptor blockers. However, with this intervention, plasma renin activity remains high, and although primary endpoints may be controlled, elevated renin concentration can contribute to cardiovascular damage. Aliskiren, a direct renin inhibitor, is the first example of a novel class of antihypertensive drugs with potent antiproteinuric effects, which, alone or combined, can contribute to delaying the progression of kidney disease.

The renin inhibitor aliskiren upregulates pro-angiogenic cells and reduces atherogenesis in mice

Sca-1 and VEGFR-2 positive pro-angiogenic cells (PAC) predict outcome of patients with vascular disease. Activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system impairs PAC function. The effects of the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren on PAC numbers and function are not known. Treatment of C57Bl/6 mice and Apo E(-/-) mice on high-cholesterol diet with aliskiren, 25 mg/kg/day s.c. for 3-6 weeks, reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure by -11.5 and -13.7% compared to vehicle. Aliskiren increased Sca-1/VEGFR-2 positive PAC in the blood (159 ± 14%) and spleen-derived DiLDL/lectin positive PAC (180 ± 21%). Migratory capacity of PAC was increased to 165 ± 16%. In cultured human PAC, aliskiren dose-dependently increased the number of colony forming units to 152 ± 9% (1 μmol/l) and 187 ± 7% (10 μmol/l), which was prevented by the eNOS inhibitor LNMA. H₂O₂-induced apoptosis of cultured human PAC was reduced to 77 ± 23%. In Apo E(-/-) mice, aliskiren reduced atherosclerotic plaque area in the aortic sinus by 58 ± 4%. Circulating Sca-1/VEGFR-2 positive PAC were upregulated to 180 ± 25% and migratory capacity of PAC was increased to 127 ± 7%. Aliskiren reduced vascular NADPH oxidase activity to 41.6 ± 6.7%. Despite similar blood pressure lowering, treatment with hydralazine (25 mg/kg/day) did not significantly influence atherogenesis or PAC. Treatment of C57Bl/6 mice with a lower dose of aliskiren (15 mg/kg/day) did not affect blood pressure but increased cultured DiLDL/lectin positive PAC to 229 ± 30% and their migratory capacity to 214 ± 24%. Aliskiren increased number and function of PAC in mice and prevented atherosclerotic lesion formation. The effects were observed independent of blood pressure lowering.

A comparative study on inter and intralaboratory reproducibility of renin measurement with a conventional enzymatic method and a new chemiluminescent assay of immunoreactive renin

BACKGROUND

The activity of the renin-angiotensin system is usually evaluated as plasma renin activity (PRA, ngAI/ml per h) but the reproducibility of this enzymatic assay is notoriously scarce. We compared the inter and intralaboratory reproducibilities of PRA with those of a new automated chemiluminescent assay, which allows the direct quantification of immunoreactive renin [chemiluminescent immunoreactive renin (CLIR), microU/ml].

METHODS

Aliquots from six pool plasmas of patients with very low to very high PRA levels were measured in 12 centres with both the enzymatic and the direct assays. The same methods were applied to three control plasma preparations with known renin content.

RESULTS

In pool plasmas, mean PRA values ranged from 0.14 +/- 0.08 to 18.9 +/- 4.1 ngAI/ml per h, whereas those of CLIR ranged from 4.2 +/- 1.7 to 436 +/- 47 microU/ml. In control plasmas, mean values of PRA and of CLIR were always within the expected range. Overall, there was a significant correlation between the two methods (r = 0.73, P < 0.01). Similar correlations were found in plasmas subdivided in those with low, intermediate and high PRA. However, the coefficients of variation among laboratories found for PRA were always higher than those of CLIR, ranging from 59.4 to 17.1% for PRA, and from 41.0 to 10.7% for CLIR (P < 0.01). Also, the mean intralaboratory variability was higher for PRA than for CLIR, being respectively, 8.5 and 4.5% (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The measurement of renin with the chemiluminescent method is a reliable alternative to PRA, having the advantage of a superior inter and intralaboratory reproducibility.

Blocking the RAAS at different levels: an update on the use of the direct renin inhibitors alone and in combination

The renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS), an important regulator of blood pressure and mediator of hypertension-related complications, is a prime target for cardiovascular drug therapy. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) were the first drugs to be used to block the RAAS. Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) have also been shown to be equally effective for treatment. Although these drugs are highly effective and are widely used in the management of hypertension, current treatment regimens with ACEIs and ARBs are unable to completely suppress the RAAS. Combinations of ACEIs and ARBs have been shown to be superior than to either agent alone for some, but certainly not all, composite cardiovascular and kidney outcomes, but dual RAAS blockade with the combination of an ACEI and an ARB is sometimes associated with an increase in the risk for adverse events, primarily hyperkalemia and worsening renal function. The recent introduction of the direct renin inhibitor, aliskiren, has made available new combination strategies to obtain a more complete blockade of the RAAS with fewer adverse events. Renin system blockade with aliskiren and another RAAS agent has been, and still is, the subject of many large-scale clinical trials and furthermore, is already available in some countries as a fixed combination.

Unmet needs in managing hypertension: potential role of direct renin inhibition

Hypertension is the most prevalent and important risk factor for cardiovascular and renal disease worldwide. Despite the large armamentarium of available blood pressure-lowering agents, the need remains for safer and more effective antihypertensive treatment. Based on current target levels of < 140/90 mm Hg, only one-third of hypertensive Americans have achieved goal blood pressure. Several strategies can help address these challenges, including increasing public awareness, and improving physician awareness of evidence-based therapeutic guidelines. There also remains a need for new therapeutic options. This review examines new developments among those agents having inhibitory activity on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS). All currently available RAAS blockers cause a reactive increase in plasma renin concentration. However, the direct renin inhibitors are the only class that diminishes plasma renin activity, an effect that may provide additional cardiovascular and/or renoprotective benefit. Aliskiren is the first clinically available direct renin inhibitor that has been shown to be effective and well tolerated both as monotherapy and in combination with other established agents in hypertensive patients. Randomized clinical trials are underway to explore the extent to which direct renin inhibition provides additive protection against cardiovascular and renal disease events.

Signal transduction of the (pro)renin receptor as a novel therapeutic target for preventing end-organ damage

The (pro)renin receptor ((P)RR) not only represents a novel component of the renin-angiotensin system but is also a promising novel drug target because of its crucial involvement in the pathogenesis of renal and cardiac end-organ damage. This review discusses the signal transduction of the (P)RR with its adapter protein promyelocytic zinc-finger protein, the impact of this receptor, especially on cardiovascular disease, and its putative interaction with renin inhibitors such as aliskiren. Furthermore, the increasing complexity regarding the cellular function of the (P)RR is addressed, which arises by the intimate link with proton pumps and the phosphatase PRL-1, as well as by the presence of different subcellular localizations and of a soluble isoform of the (P)RR. Finally, the rationale and strategy for the development of small-molecule antagonists of the (P)RR, called renin/prorenin receptor blockers, are presented.

Activity Assays and Immunoassays for Plasma Renin and Prorenin: Information Provided and Precautions Necessary for Accurate Measurement

Background: Measurement of plasma renin is important for the clinical assessment of hypertensive patients. The most common methods for measuring plasma renin are the plasma renin activity (PRA) assay and the renin immunoassay. The clinical application of renin inhibitor therapy has thrown into focus the differences in information provided by activity assays and immunoassays for renin and prorenin measurement and has drawn attention to the need for precautions to ensure their accurate measurement.

Content: Renin activity assays and immunoassays provide related but different information. Whereas activity assays measure only active renin, immunoassays measure both active and inhibited renin. Particular care must be taken in the collection and processing of blood samples and in the performance of these assays to avoid errors in renin measurement. Both activity assays and immunoassays are susceptible to renin overestimation due to prorenin activation. In addition, activity assays performed with peptidase inhibitors may overestimate the degree of inhibition of PRA by renin inhibitor therapy. Moreover, immunoassays may overestimate the reactive increase in plasma renin concentration in response to renin inhibitor therapy, owing to the inhibitor promoting conversion of prorenin to an open conformation that is recognized by renin immunoassays.

Conclusions: The successful application of renin assays to patient care requires that the clinician and the clinical chemist understand the information provided by these assays and of the precautions necessary to ensure their accuracy.

Aliskiren fails to lower blood pressure in patients who have either low PRA levels or whose PRA falls insufficiently or reactively rises

BACKGROUND

Suppressed baseline plasma renin activity (PRA) levels or large reactive increases in renin secretion are two possible reasons for treatment failure with antirenin system drugs.

METHODS

To investigate their prevalence we reanalyzed data from three published clinical trials of the renin inhibitor aliskiren.

RESULTS

Aliskiren failed to lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) by at least 10 mm Hg in half of all patients. It was very effective in two-thirds of medium- to high-renin patients (-19 mm Hg). But BP did not fall in most low-renin patients, or in 30% of medium- to high-renin patients. BP actually rose by >10 mm Hg in 5% of patients taking aliskiren and in >10% of patients when aliskiren was added to an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI). PRA changed in parallel with BP. Although PRA fell in most patients, it actually rose in 5% and in up to 30% when aliskiren was added to an ARB or ACEI.

CONCLUSIONS

There are two reasons for treatment failure with aliskiren. Many hypertensive patients have large BP falls. But, BP does not fall in most low-renin patients or in medium- to high-renin patients whose PRA levels do not fall sufficiently. If the concept of that treatment resistance is caused by excessive reactive increases in renin secretion is confirmed, then a PRA determination during treatment could be used to guide subsequent addition or subtraction of either natriuretic or antirenin drug types, to thereby correct BP and reduce cardiovascular risk.

Prorenin engages the (pro)renin receptor like renin and both ligand activities are unopposed by aliskiren

OBJECTIVES

Inhibition of (pro)renin receptor activation was demonstrated to inhibit or even abolish the development of end-organ damage in animal models. The new renin inhibitor, aliskiren, markedly increases the plasma concentration of the (pro)renin receptor ligands prorenin and renin in patients. The effects of prorenin and of renin inhibitors on the signal transduction cascade of the (pro)renin receptor are currently unknown.

RESULTS

Our results indicate that renin and prorenin were equally potent in (pro)renin receptor activation by decreasing (pro)renin receptor mRNA, increasing phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase p85alpha mRNA and augmenting viable cell number, respectively. These effects of renin and prorenin are both abolished using small-interfering RNA against the (pro)renin receptor or its adaptor promyelocytic zinc finger protein. The renin inhibitor aliskiren did not inhibit the renin-induced or prorenin-induced activation of the (pro)renin receptor.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report demonstrating equal ligand activities of both, renin and prorenin, on the (pro)renin receptor - promyelocytic zinc finger protein-phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase-p85alpha pathway. The failure of aliskiren to inhibit the noncatalytic effects of renin and prorenin may be of clinical relevance considering the increase in plasma concentrations of (pro)renin under aliskiren treatment.

Aliskiren

Aliskiren is the first orally active inhibitor of renin to be approved for clinical use as an antihypertensive agent. The development program has established that at the licensed doses of 150 mg and 300 mg, there are dose-related falls in blood pressure comparable to those seen with other major classes of antihypertensive drugs and that these falls are associated with a placebo level of side effects. Aliskiren was found to be effective either as monotherapy or in combination with drugs from the other major classes. As expected, there was a greater benefit from adding aliskiren to natriuretic drugs than to other blockers of the renin system. However, there was also some consistent benefit from dual renin blockade. Aliskiren is likely to be of most value in patients uncontrolled by, or intolerant of, other classes. Rational understanding of the renin system will maximize its value, for instance, by encouraging greater use of natriuretic agents in patients with resistant hypertension to render their hypertension renin dependent. Whether there are cardiovascular benefits other than blood pressure control in blocking the renin system remains to be demonstrated. It is hoped that long-term outcome studies with aliskiren will finally allow this question to be answered.