Significance of Microvascular Function in Visual-Functional Mismatch Between Invasive Coronary Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve

Determinants and Prognoses of Visual-Functional Mismatches After Mechanical Reperfusion in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Background

Discordance between the anatomy and physiology of the coronary has important implications for managing patients with stable coronary disease, but its significance in ST-elevation myocardial infarction has not been fully elucidated.

Methods

The retrospective study involved patients diagnosed with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), along with quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and quantitative flow ratio (QFR) assessments. Patients were stratified into four groups regarding the severity of the culprit vessel, both visually and functionally: concordantly negative (QCA-diameter stenosis [DS] ≤ 50% and QFR > 0.80), mismatch (QCA-DS > 50% and QFR > 0.80), reverse mismatch (QCA-DS ≤ 50% and QFR ≤ 0.80), and concordantly positive (QCA-DS > 50% and QFR ≤ 0.80). Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the clinical factors linked to visual-functional mismatches. Kaplan‒Meier analysis was conducted to estimate the 18-month adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)-free survival between the four groups.

Results

The study involved 310 patients, with 68 presenting visual-functional mismatch, and 51 exhibiting reverse mismatch. The mismatch was associated with higher angiography-derived microcirculatory resistance (AMR) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=1.016, 95% CI: 1.010-1.022, P<0.001). Reverse mismatch was associated with larger area stenosis (aOR=1.044, 95% CI: 1.004-1.086, P=0.032), lower coronary flow velocity (aOR=0.690, 95% CI: 0.567-0.970, P<0.001) and lower AMR (aOR=0.947, 95% CI: 0.924-0.970, P<0.001). Additionally, the mismatch group showed the worst 18-month MACE-free survival among the four groups (Log rank test p = 0.013).

Conclusion

AMR plays a significant role in the occurrence of visual-functional mismatches between QCA-DS and QFR, and the mismatch group showed the worst prognosis.

Long-term prognostic value of quantitative-flow-ratio-concordant revascularization in stable coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVES

Confirming the prognostic value of global QFR and evaluating the long-term prognosis of QFR-concordant therapy in stable coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND

Wire-based functional evaluation of coronary disease is linked to patient's prognosis. Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) is a newer index of computational physiology, linked to clinical outcomes and prognosis at 1 year follow-up. Long-term prognosis of QFR-concordant revascularization in stable coronary artery disease is however unknown hitherto.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with stable coronary disease undergoing coronary angiography were included. Centralized and blinded QFR analysis of three coronary territories was performed. Three vessel QFR (3vQFR) was defined as the sum of the basal QFR of each coronary territory. QFR-concordant revascularization was met if all significant lesions (QFR ≤ 0.80) were revascularized and all non-significant lesions (QFR > 0.80) were not; otherwise, the case was defined as QFR-discordant revascularization. Patient-oriented composite end-point (POCE) of cardiac death, myocardial infarction and unscheduled revascularization was the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

A total of 803 patients from six high-volume centers were included. Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class II angina was the most frequent (48.9%) clinical presentation. Median of follow-up was 68.8 months. 3vQFR was an independent predictor of POCE (HR 1.79 CI95% 1.01-3.18), with 2.75 as optimal cut-off value, irrespective of the therapy received. QFR-discordant revascularization (QFR+/Revascularization- or QFR-/Revascularization+) was an independent predictor of POCE in multivariate analysis (HR 1.65, CI 95% 1.03-2.64).

CONCLUSION

Global burden of epicardial coronary atherosclerosis, as evaluated by 3vQFR, as well as QFR-discordant therapy are independent predictors of adverse clinical outcome at long-term follow-up in stable coronary artery disease.

Anatomical and Functional Discrepancy in Diabetic Patients With Intermediate Coronary Lesions - An Intravascular Ultrasound and Quantitative Flow Ratio Study

BACKGROUND

Data regarding the performance of computational fractional flow reserve in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) remain scarce. This study sought to explore the impact of DM on quantitative flow ratio (QFR) and its association with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-derived anatomical references.Methods and Results: IVUS and QFR were retrospectively analyzed in 237 non-diabetic and 93 diabetic patients with 250 and 102 intermediate lesions, respectively. Diabetics were further categorized based on adequate (HbA1c <7.0%: 47 patients with 53 lesions) or poor (HbA1c ≥7.0%: 46 patients with 49 lesions) glycemic control. Lesions with QFR ≤0.8 or minimum lumen area (MLA) ≤4.0 mm²and plaque burden (PB, %) ≥70 were considered functionally or anatomically significant, respectively. PB increased, and MLA decreased stepwise across non-diabetics, diabetics with adequate glycemic control and those with poor glycemic control. In contrast, QFR was similar among the 3 groups. PB correlated significantly with the QFR for lesions in non-diabetics, but not for lesions in diabetics. DM was independently correlated with the functionally non-significant lesions (QFR >0.8) with high-risk IVUS features (MLA ≤4.0 mm²and PB ≥70; OR 2.053, 95% CI: 1.137-3.707, P=0.017). When considering the effect of glycemic control, HbA1c was an independent predictor of anatomical-functional discordance (OR 1.347, 95% CI: 1.089-1.667, P=0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomical-functional discordance of intermediate coronary lesions assessed by IVUS and QFR is exacerbated in patients with diabetes, especially when glycemia is poorly controlled.

The Role of Certain Polymorphic Variants in Genes, Previously Associated with Blood Pressure Values, with Reference to the Risk of Development of Coronary Artery Disease

The aim of the study was to analyze the effect of polymorphic variants previously associated with arterial hypertension (AH) in Genome Wide Association Studies (GWASs) in/next to genes and locuses CYP7A1 and PLEKHA7 on the development of coronary artery disease (CAD) in Bulgarian patients. A hundred and nine consecutive patients with angiographically documented CAD were studied. The genotyping was done with 7900 HT Fast Real-Time PCR (Applied Biosystems) with TaqMan® method. The control group consisted of 192 healthy population controls, selected from the bio- bank of the Molecular Medicine Center. SPSS and PLINK were used for the statistical analysis with level of significance < 0.05 and confidence interval 95%. The mean age of the studied patients was 63.71 ± 9.35 years; 35 (35%) females. Previous myocardial infarction (MI) had 38(38%); one-vessel – 39 (39%); two-vessel – 28 (28%); three-vessel disease – 34 (34%); 43 (43%) were with diabetes mellitus; 92 (92%) – with arterial hypertension (AH); 77 (77%) – with dyslipidemia; 42 (42%) were smokers; 25 (25%) were obese. We did not find any significant association between CAD and poly- morphism rs11191548 near CYP17A1 and only a tendency for genotype of rs381815 in PLEKHA7 (p = 0.06; OR 0.64; CI 0.40-1.02 for CAD) under dominant model. This is of practical importance both for studying the genetic aspects of CAD in the future and for enlargement of the current database.

Impact of overestimation of fractional flow reserve by adenosine on anatomical-functional mismatch

Adenosine occasionally results in overestimation of fractional flow reserve (FFR) values, compared with other hyperemic stimuli. We aimed to elucidate the association of overestimation of FFR by adenosine with anatomically significant but functionally non-significant lesions (anatomical-functional mismatch) and its influence on reclassification of functional significance. Distal-to-aortic pressure ratio (Pd/Pa) was measured using adenosine (Pd/PaADN) and papaverine (Pd/PaPAP) in 326 patients (326 vessels). The overestimation of FFR was calculated as Pd/PaADN-Pd/PaPAP. The anatomical-functional mismatch was defined as diameter stenosis > 50% and Pd/PaADN > 0.80. Reclassification was indicated by Pd/PaADN > 0.80 and Pd/PaPAP ≤ 0.80. The mismatch (n = 72) had a greater overestimation of FFR than the non-mismatch (n = 99): median 0.02 (interquartile range 0.01-0.05) versus 0.01 (0.00-0.04), p = 0.014. Multivariable analysis identified the overestimation of FFR (p = 0.003), minimal luminal diameter (p = 0.001), and non-left anterior descending artery (LAD) location (p < 0.001) as determinants of the mismatch. Reclassification was indicated in 29% of the mismatch and was more frequent in the LAD than in the non-LAD (52% vs. 20%, p = 0.005). The overestimation of FFR is an independent determinant of anatomical-functional mismatch. Anatomical-functional mismatch, specifically in the LAD, may suggest a false-negative result.

Three-Dimensional Angiographic Characteristics versus Functional Stenosis Severity in Fractional and Coronary Flow Reserve Discordance: A DEFINE FLOW Sub Study

Background: Coronary angiography alone is insufficient to identify lesions associated with myocardial ischemia that may benefit from revascularization. Coronary physiology parameters may improve clinical decision making in addition to coronary angiography, but the association between 2D and 3D qualitative coronary angiography (QCA) and invasive pressure and flow measurements is yet to be elucidated. Methods: We associated invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR), coronary flow reserve (CFR) and coronary flow capacity (CFC) with 2D- and 3D-QCA in 430 intermediate lesions of 366 patients. Results: Overall, 2D-QCA analysis resulted in less severe stenosis severity compared with 3D-QCA analysis. FFR+/CFR− lesions had similar 3D-QCA characteristics as FFR+/CFR+ lesions. In contrast, vessels with FFR−/CFR+ discordance had 3D-QCA characteristics similar to those of vessels with concordant FFR−/CFR−. Contrarily, FFR+/CFR− lesions had CFC similar to that of as FFR-/CFR- lesions. Conclusions: Non-flow-limiting lesions (FFR+/CFR−) have 3D-QCA characteristics similar to those of FFR+/CFR+, but the majority are not associated with inducible myocardial ischemia as determined by invasive CFC. FFR−/CFR+ lesions have 3D-QCA characteristics similar to those of FFR−/CFR− lesions but are more frequently associated with a moderately to severely reduced CFC, illustrating the angiographic–functional mismatch in discordant lesions.

Determinants of visual-functional mismatches as assessed by coronary angiography and quantitative flow ratio

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the determinants of visual-functional mismatches between quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and the quantitative flow ratio (QFR).

BACKGROUND

The fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been established as a method to estimate the functional stenosis severity of coronary artery disease and to optimize decision-making for revascularization. The QFR is a novel angiography-derived computational index that can estimate the FFR without pharmacologically induced hyperemia or the use of pressure wire.

METHODS

A total of 504 de novo intermediate-to-severe stable lesions that underwent angiographic and physiological assessments were analyzed. All lesions were divided into four groups based on the significance of visual (QCA-diameter stenosis [DS] > 50% and ≤ 50%) and functional (QFR ≤ 0.80 and > 0.80) stenosis severity. Patient characteristics, angiographic findings, and physiological indices were compared.

RESULTS

One-hundred seventy-eight lesions (35.3%) showed discordant visual-functional assessments; mismatch (QCA-DS > 50% and QFR > 0.80) in 75 lesions (14.9%) and reverse mismatch (QCA-DS ≤ 50% and QFR ≤ 0.80) in 103 lesions (20.4%), respectively. Reverse mismatch was associated with non-diabetes, lower ejection fraction, higher Duke jeopardy score, and lower coronary flow reserve (CFR). Mismatch was associated with smaller QCA-DS, larger reference diameter, shorter lesion length, lower Duke jeopardy score, and higher CFR. Lesion location and microcirculatory resistance was not associated with the prevalence of mismatches. Reverse mismatch group had the higher prevalence of discordant decision-makings between QFR and FFR than the other three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The CFR and subtended myocardial mass were predictors of visual-functional mismatches between QCA-DS and the QFR. Caution should be exercised in lesions showing QCA-DS/QFR reverse mismatch.

Comparison of Clinically Adjudicated Versus Flow-Based Adjudication of Revascularization Events in Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

In clinical trials, the optimal method of adjudicating revascularization events as clinically or nonclinically indicated (CI) is to use an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC). However, the Academic Research Consortium-2 currently recommends using physiological assessment. The level of agreement between these methods of adjudication remains unknown.

METHODS

Data for all CEC adjudicated revascularization events among the 3457 patients followed-up for 2-years in the TALENT trial, and 3-years in the DESSOLVE III, PIONEER, and SYNTAX II trial were collected and readjudicated according to a quantitative flow ratio (QFR) analysis of the revascularized vessels, by an independent core lab blinded to the results of the conventional CEC adjudication. The κ statistic was used to assess the level of agreement between the 2 methods.

RESULTS

In total, 351 CEC-adjudicated repeat revascularization events occurred, with retrospective QFR analysis successfully performed in 212 (60.4%). According to QFR analysis, 104 events (QFR ≤0.80) were adjudicated as CI revascularizations and 108 (QFR >0.80) were not. The agreement between CEC and QFR based adjudication was just fair (κ=0.335). Between the 2 methods of adjudication, there was a disagreement of 26.4% and 7.1% in CI and non-CI revascularization, respectively. Overall, the concordance and discordance rates were 66.5% and 33.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this event-level analysis, QFR based adjudication had a relatively low agreement with CEC adjudication with respect to whether revascularization events were CI or not. CEC adjudication appears to overestimate CI revascularization as compared with QFR adjudication. Direct comparison between these 2 strategies in terms of revascularization adjudication is warranted in future trials. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: TALENT trial: NCT02870140, DESSOLVE III trial: NCT02385279, SYNTAX II: NCT02015832, and PIONEER trial: NCT02236975.

Design and rationale of the EVOCATION trial: A prospective, randomized, exploratory study comparing the effect of evolocumab on coronary microvascular function after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with stable coronary artery disease

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a standard treatment in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD); however, periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI) remains a common complication of PCI. Aggressive lipid-lowering therapy with statin has shown to reduce the incidence of PMI by preventing coronary microvascular dysfunction. It is unclear whether evolocumab, a potent lipid-lowering agent, could diminish microvascular damage after PCI. The EVOCATION trial (jRCTs051180022) is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, parallel-group, exploratory, investigator-initiated clinical study to evaluate whether pretreatment with evolocumab could decrease the index of microvascular resistance (IMR) after PCI in patients with stable CAD. This study population consists of 100 patients with stable CAD who will undergo PCI and have high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels despite administration of maximum tolerated dose of statins for at least 2 weeks. Eligible patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either evolocumab 140 mg every 2 weeks in addition to standard of care treatment or standard of care treatment only for 2-6 weeks before PCI. The primary endpoint is IMR after PCI. The EVOCATION trial will evaluate whether pretreatment with evolocumab reduces periprocedural microvascular damage in patients with stable CAD undergoing PCI.

Association of quantitative flow ratio-derived microcirculatory indices with anatomical-functional discordance in intermediate coronary lesions

Discrepancy between coronary lesion severity and functional significance has always been a relevant issue in the management of patients undergoing coronary angiography and/or revascularization. We sought to investigate the relationship between quantitative flow ratio (QFR)-derived microcirculatory indices and anatomical-functional mismatch/reverse mismatch in intermediate coronary lesions. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging and QFR were analyzed in 117 de novo intermediate coronary lesions. Lesions with QFR ≤ 0.8 were considered hemodynamically significant. Anatomical significance of the lesions was defined according to the best cutoff value of combined IVUS parameters for predicting QFR ≤ 0.8. QFR-derived microcirculatory indices including contrast-flow QFR minus fixed-flow QFR (cQFR-fQFR), hyperemic flow velocity and angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR_angio) were calculated. The best cutoff values of IVUS parameters for predicting QFR ≤ 0.8 were minimum lumen area (MLA) 3.1mm² and plaque burden (PB) 70%, with area under the curve of 0.635 and 0.703, respectively. The total discordance rate of lesion functional significance between IVUS and QFR assessments was 26.5%, with 21 lesions (17.9%) being classified as mismatch (MLA ≤ 3.1mm² and PB ≥ 70% and QFR > 0.8) and 10 lesions (8.5%) as reverse-mismatch (MLA > 3.1 mm² or PB < 70% and QFR ≤ 0.8). At multivariate analysis, IMR_angio was identified as an independent predictor of mismatch (OR1.675, 95%CI:1.176-2.386, P = 0.004), whereas hyperemic flow velocity was identified as an independent predictor of reverse-mismatch (OR 1.233, 95%CI:1.073-1.416, P = 0.003). In intermediate coronary lesions, although MLA 3.1mm² and PB 70% determined by IVUS are predictive of QFR-defined functional significance, the discordance rate remains substantial. QFR-derived microcirculatory indices are independently associated with anatomical-functional discordance between IVUS and QFR assessments.

Anatomical-functional discordance between quantitative coronary angiography and diastolic pressure ratio during wave-free period

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the predictors of anatomical-functional discordance between quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) derived diameter stenosis (QCA-DS) and diastolic pressure ratio during wave-free period (dPR_WFP ).

BACKGROUND

The discrepancy between angiographical stenosis and physiological significance is frequently experienced in clinical practice. Although the anatomical-functional discordance between angiography and fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been intensively investigated, that of resting index including dPR_WFP remains to be elucidated.

METHODS

In a total of 647 angiographically intermediate lesions with QCA-DS between 30 and 70% in 502 patients, predictors of having QCA-DS >50% and dPR_WFP > 0.89 (QCA-dPR_WFP mismatch), and those of having QCA-DS ≤50% and dPR_WFP ≤ 0.89 (QCA-dPR_WFP reverse mismatch) were determined. FFR ≤0.80 was defined as positive FFR and the predictors of QCA-FFR discordance were determined as well.

RESULTS

QCA-dPR_WFP mismatch and reverse mismatch were observed in 27.5 and 17.6% of cases, respectively. The predictors of mismatch were non-left anterior descending artery (LAD) lesion, large minimal lumen diameter, low baseline heart rate, and high coronary flow reserve (CFR), while those of reverse mismatch were LAD lesion, non-culprit lesion of acute coronary syndrome, long lesion length, low left ventricular ejection fraction, and low CFR and index of microcirculatory resistance. Age, sex, and the culprit vessel of prior myocardial infarction were not significant determinants of QCA-dPR_WFP discordance unlike QCA-FFR discordance derived from the same cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomical-functional discordance between angiography and dPR_WFP was not uncommon. Predictors differed between QCA-dPR_WFP discordance and QCA-FFR discordance.

Resting distal to aortic pressure ratio and fractional flow reserve discordance affects the diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio: Results from an individual patient data meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio (QFR) related to fractional flow reserve (FFR) and resting distal-to-aortic pressure ratio (resting Pd/Pa) concordance.

BACKGROUND

QFR is a method for computation of FFR based on standard coronary angiography. It is unclear how QFR is performed in patients with discordance between FFR and resting pressure ratios (distal-to-aortic pressure ratio [Pd/Pa]).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The main comparison was the diagnostic performance of QFR with FFR as reference stratified by correspondence between FFR and resting Pd/Pa. Secondary outcome measures included distribution of clinical or procedural characteristics stratified by FFR and resting Pd/Pa correspondence.

RESULTS

Four prospective studies matched the inclusion criteria. Analysis was performed on patient level data reaching a total of 759 patients and 887 vessels with paired FFR, QFR, and resting Pd/Pa. Median FFR was 0.85 (IQR: 0.77-0.90). Diagnostic accuracy of QFR with FFR as reference was higher if FFR corresponded to resting Pd/Pa: accuracy 90% (95% CI: 88-92) versus 72% (95% CI: 64-80), p < .001, and sAUC 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92-0.96) versus 0.73 (95% CI: 0.69-0.77), p < .001. Resting Pd/Pa and FFR discordance were related to age, sex, hypertension, and lesion severity.

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic performance of QFR with FFR as reference is reduced for lesions with discordant FFR (≤0.80) and resting Pd/Pa (≤0.92) measurements.

Determinants and prognostic implications of instantaneous wave-free ratio in patients with mild to intermediate coronary stenosis: Comparison with those of fractional flow reserve

The instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) is used for assessing the hemodynamic severity of a lesion, as an alternative to the fractional flow reserve (FFR). We evaluated the relationship between iFR and FFR in detail and the clinical significance of iFR in patients with mild to intermediate coronary artery stenosis. We recruited consecutive 323 patients (421 lesions) with lesions exhibiting 30% to 80% diameter stenosis on angiography in whom FFR and iFR were measured. In the total lesions, mean diameter stenosis was 48.6% ± 9.0%, and physiological significance, defined by FFR of 0.80 or less or by iFR of 0.92 or less, was observed in 32.5% or 33.5%, respectively. Mismatch between iFR and FFR was observed in 18.1% of the lesions. Clinical factors did not predict FFR value; however, gender, diabetes mellitus, aortic stenosis, anemia, high-sensitivity CRP value, and renal function predicted iFR value. In multivariate logistic analysis after adjustment for FFR value, gender (p < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.005), aortic stenosis (p = 0.016), high-sensitivity CRP (p < 0.001), and renal function (p = 0.003) were all independent predictors of iFR value. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, the baseline iFR predicted the subsequent major cardiovascular events (MACE) (hazard ratio, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.16–4.93; p = 0.018) and the results of the iFR-guided strategy for predicting rates of MACE and myocardial infarction/revascularization were superior to those of the FFR-guided strategy. In conclusion, significant clinical factors predicted iFR value, which affected the prognostic capacity. The iFR-guided strategy may be superior in patients with mild to intermediate stenosis.

Abnormal Fractional Flow Reserve in Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Background The basis of discordance between invasive coronary angiographic (ICA) anatomic stenosis and fractional flow reserve (FFR) is not fully understood. We analyzed coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) characteristics of ICA-verified nonobstructive lesions in the proximal or midleft anterior descending artery with FFR ≤0.8, that is, anatomy-physiology mismatch. Methods and Results CTA and ICA were performed in 108 patients. FFR was measured during intravenous ATP (180 μg/[kg·min]) infusion. CTA-verified plaque characteristics between 53 consecutive ICA-FFR mismatch (ICA-quantitative coronary angiography <50%, FFR≤0.8) and 55 ICA-FFR match (ICA-quantitative coronary angiography<50%, FFR>0.8) vessels were compared. CTA-verified vessel area (20.7±6.7 versus 16.9±4.8 mm²; P=0.0007), positive area remodeling index (ARI; 1.38±0.23 versus 1.06±0.11; P<0.0001), %plaque area (64.7±12.7 versus 57.4±8.5%; P<0.0007), jeopardized myocardial mass (46.2±18.5 versus 37.1±14.3 g; P= 0.006), and the prevalence of low attenuation plaque (45.3% versus 9.1%; P<0.0001) at the minimum lumen area were significantly higher in the ICA-FFR mismatch than the match group. By receiver operation curve analysis, the areas under the curve for positive area remodeling index, %plaque area and jeopardized myocardial mass were 0.921, 0.681, and 0.641, respectively, for the diagnosis of mismatch (cutoff values 1.13, 66% and 58.7 g, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity of area remodeling index >1.13 for predicting ICA-FFR mismatch were 88.7% and 78.2%, respectively. Conclusions In the absence of anatomically significant stenosis, abnormal FFR is more frequently encountered in patients with CTA-derived positive remodeling, larger plaque burden, and low attenuation plaque. These findings contribute to a better understanding of how FFR-based decision-making might translate into demonstrated superior clinical outcomes.

Impact of hydrostatic pressure on fractional flow reserve: in vivo experimental study of anatomical height difference of coronary arteries

BACKGROUND

Although pressure equalization of the sensor-tipped guidewire and systemic pressure is mandatory in measuring fractional flow reserve (FFR), pressure in the distal artery (Pd) with wire advancement can be influenced by hydrostatic pressure related to the height difference between the catheter tip and the distal pressure sensor. We therefore analyzed the impact of hydrostatic pressure on FFR in vivo by modification of the height difference.

METHODS

To reveal the anatomical height difference in human coronary arteries, measurement was performed during computed tomography angiography (CTA) of five consecutive patients. Utilizing the healthy coronary arteries of female swine, height difference diversity was reproduced by body rotation and vertical inclination. FFR measurements were performed during maximum hyperemia with adenosine. The height difference was calculated fluoroscopically with a contrast medium-filled balloon for reference.

RESULTS

In human coronary CTA, height averages from the ostium in the left anterior descending artery (34.6 mm) were significantly higher than in the left circumflex (-15.5 mm, p = 0.008) and right coronary arteries (-2.3 mm, p = 0.008). In our swine model, reproduced height variation ranged from -7.2 cm to +6.5 cm. Mean FFR was significantly lower in positive sensor height and higher in negative sensor height compared to the reference height. Linear regression analyses revealed significant correlations between height difference and FFR, observed among all coronary arteries, as well as between the height difference and Pd-aortic pressure mismatch. Subtracting 0.622 mmHg/cm height difference from Pd could correct the expected hydrostatic pressure influence.

CONCLUSION

Hydrostatic pressure variation resulting from sensor height influenced FFR values might affect interpretation during FFR assessment.

Functional classification discordance in intermediate coronary stenoses between fractional flow reserve and angiography-based quantitative flow ratio

Background

Measurement of the contrast-flow quantitative flow ratio (cQFR) is a novel method for rapid computational estimation of fractional flow reserve (FFR). Discordance between FFR and cQFR has not been completely characterised.

Methods

We performed a post-hoc analysis of 504 vessels with angiographically intermediate stenosis in 504 patients who underwent measurement of FFR, coronary flow reserve (CFR), the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) and Duke jeopardy score.

Results

In total, 396 (78.6%) and 108 (21.4%) lesions showed concordant and discordant FFR and cQFR functional classifications, respectively. Among lesions with a reduced FFR (FFR+), those with a preserved cQFR (cQFR-) showed significantly lower IMR, shorter mean transit time (Tmn), shorter lesion length (all, p<0.01) and similar CFR and Duke jeopardy scores compared with lesions showing a reduced cQFR (cQFR+). Furthermore, lesions with FFR+ and cQFR- had significantly lower IMR and shorter Tmn compared with lesions showing a preserved FFR (FFR-) and cQFR+. Of note, in cQFR+ lesions, higher IMR lesions were associated with decreased diagnostic accuracy (high-IMR; 63.0% and low-IMR; 75.8%, p<0.01). In contrast, in cQFR- lesions, lower IMR lesions was associated with decreased diagnostic accuracy (high-IMR group; 96.8% and low-IMR group; 80.0%, p<0.01). Notably, in total, 31 territories (6.2%; 'jump out' group) had an FFR above the upper limit of the grey zone (>0.80) and a cQFR below the lower limit (≤0.75). In contrast, five territories (1.0%; 'jump in' group) exhibited opposite results (FFR of ≤0.75 and cQFR of >0.80). The 'jump out' territories showed significantly higher IMR values than 'jump in' territories (p<0.01).

Conclusions

FFR- with cQFR+ is associated with increased microvascular resistance, and FFR+ with cQFR- showed preservation of microvascular function with high coronary flow. Microvascular function affected diagnostic performance of cQFR in relation to functional stenosis significance.

Clinical and angiographic factors predicting fractional flow reserve and explaining the visual-functional mismatch in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis

BACKGROUND

Visual-functional mismatch between coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been reported, and the underlying reason remains poorly understood. Therefore, the relationship between angiographic measurements and FFR was evaluated, and predictors for FFR in intermediate coronary artery stenosis were determined.

METHODS

Consecutive 314 patients (405 lesions) with a lesion of 30-80% angiographic diameter stenosis who underwent invasive FFR were recruited. The myocardial area supplied by the coronary artery distal to the stenosis was evaluated using a modified version of the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) score. Participants underwent follow-up, and major cardiovascular events (MACE), including all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and unplanned revascularization were recorded.

RESULTS

Although % diameter stenosis was correlated with FFR (R = 0.279, P < 0.001), diameter stenosis-FFR mismatch was observed in 37.8% of the lesions. Although FFR values were not associated with clinical factors, such as age, sex, and comorbidities, it was correlated with minimal lumen diameter (MLD), diffuse lesion, presence of proximal lesion, and BARI score. In addition, the lesions in left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery showed low FFR values compared with those in the left circumflex coronary artery or right coronary artery. In multivariate logistic analysis, MLD (β coefficient = 0.330), diffuse lesion (β coefficient = -0.266), proximal lesion (β coefficient = -0.144), BARI score (β coefficient = -0.219), and LAD lesion (β coefficient = -0.293) were all independent predictors for FFR value. The estimated FFR value based on these factors showed smaller mismatch and higher sensitivity. No difference was observed in the event rates for MACE and MI or revascularization between the FFR-guided and estimated FFR-guided strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

MLD, diffuse lesion, proximal lesion, BARI score, and lesion vessel were independent predictors for FFR in intermediate coronary stenosis. Not only the extent of local lesion stenosis but also the amount of myocardial supply and the lesion location may determine the physiological significance and explain the visual-functional mismatch. The estimation of FFR by these factors may be useful in clinical practice.

Impact of Hydrostatic Pressure Variations Caused by Height Differences in Supine and Prone Positions on Fractional Flow Reserve Values in the Coronary Circulation

Objectives

To examine the influence of hydrostatic pressure on fractional flow reserve (FFR) in vivo.

Background

Systematic differences in FFR values have been observed previously in the left anterior descending artery (LAD), left circumflex artery (LCX), and right coronary artery (RCA). It has been suggested that as the hydrostatic pressure variations caused by the height differences between the catheter tip (mean aortic pressure (Pa)) and pressure-wire sensor (mean distal intracoronary pressure (Pd)) are small, intracoronary pressure need not be corrected.

Methods

Resting Pd/Pa and FFR values in 23 patients (27 lesions) were measured and compared in supine and prone positions. These values were corrected by hydrostatic pressure influenced by height levels and compared. Height differences between Pa and Pd were calculated using coronary computed tomography angiographies.

Results

In LAD, resting Pd/Pa and FFR values were significantly higher in the prone position than in the supine position (0.97 ± 0.05 vs 0.89 ± 0.04, P < 0.001 (resting Pd/Pa); 0.81 ± 0.09 vs 0.72 ± 0.07, P < 0.001 (FFR)). Conversely, in LCX and RCA, these values were significantly lower in the prone position (LCX: 0.93 ± 0.03 vs 0.98 ± 0.03, P < 0.001 (resting Pd/Pa); 0.84 ± 0.05 vs 0.89 ± 0.04, P < 0.001 (FFR); RCA: 0.91 ± 0.04 vs 0.98 ± 0.03, P=0.005 (resting Pd/Pa); 0.78 ± 0.07 vs 0.84 ± 0.07, P=0.019 (FFR)). FFR values corrected by hydrostatic pressure showed good correlations in the supine and prone positions (R² = 0.948 in LAD; R² = 0.942 in LCX; R² = 0.928 in RCA).

Conclusions

Hydrostatic pressure variations due to height levels influence intracoronary pressure measurements and largely affect resting Pd/Pa and FFR, which might have caused systematic differences in FFR values between the anterior and posterior coronary territories.

Improved diagnosis of the number of stenosed coronary artery vessels by segmentation with scatter and photo-peak window data for attenuation correction in myocardial perfusion SPECT

BACKGROUND

Attenuation correction using segmentation of scatter and photo-peak window data (SSPAC) enables an evaluation of the attenuation map in a patient-specific manner without additional radiation exposure. We compared the accuracy of SSPAC and non-corrected myocardial perfusion scintigraphy methods for diagnosing the number of stenosed coronary artery vessels.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively reviewed the data from 183 consecutive patients who underwent 99mTc-tetrofosmin stress/rest SPECT examination and a coronary angiography within 3 months. The MPS images were reconstructed with and without SSPAC attenuation correction. We examined the accuracy of the quantitative interpretation using summed differential score in the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD). The attenuation maps were successfully determined in 179 of 183 patients (98%). In terms of the vessel-based diagnostic ability, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values of the SSPAC and non-correction methods for diagnosing CAD in individual coronary territories were 77%*, 89%, 74%*, and 90%* vs 51%, 87%, 62%, and 82%, respectively (*P < .05). In 35 patients with multi-vessel CAD, those values were 78%*, 81%, 93%, and 55%* vs 49%, 81%, 89%, and 34%, respectively (*P < .05; AUC: 0.82 vs 0.62, P < .05).

CONCLUSION

SSPAC-corrected SPECT myocardial perfusion images exhibit improved accuracy in the detection of the number of stenosed coronary artery vessels, even in patients with multi-vessel CAD.

Sex Differences in Adenosine-Free Coronary Pressure Indexes: A CONTRAST Substudy

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to investigate sex differences in adenosine-free coronary pressure indexes.

BACKGROUND

Several adenosine-free coronary pressure wire indexes have been proposed to assess the functional significance of coronary artery lesions; however, there is a theoretical concern that sex differences may affect diagnostic performance because of differences in resting flow and distal myocardial mass.

METHODS

In this CONTRAST (Can Contrast Injection Better Approximate FFR Compared to Pure Resting Physiology?) substudy, contrast fractional flow reserve (cFFR), obtained during contrast-induced submaximal hyperemia, the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), and distal/proximal coronary pressure ratio (Pd/Pa) were compared with fractional flow reserve (FFR) in 547 men and 216 women. Using FFR ≤0.8 as a reference, the diagnostic performance of each index was compared.

RESULTS

Men and women had similar diameter stenosis (p = 0.78), but women were less likely to have FFR ≤0.80 than men (42.5% vs. 51.5%, p = 0.04). Sensitivity was similar among cFFR, iFR, and Pd/Pa when comparing women and men, respectively (cFFR, 77.5% vs. 75.3%; p = 0.69; iFR, 84.9% vs. 79.4%; p = 0.30; Pd/Pa, 78.8% vs. 77.3%; p = 0.78). cFFR was more specific than iFR or Pd/Pa regardless of sex (cFFR, 94.3% vs. 95.8%; p = 0.56; iFR, 75.6% vs. 80.1%; p = 0.38; Pd/Pa, 80.6% vs. 78.7%; p = 0.69). By receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, cFFR provided better diagnostic accuracy than resting indexes irrespective of sex (p ≤ 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the theoretical concern, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of cFFR, iFR, and Pd/Pa did not differ between the sexes. Irrespective of sex, cFFR provides the best diagnostic performance.