Profiling Hospital Performance on the Basis of Readmission After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Ontario, Canada

The interventional care for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Establishing indicators for optimal interventional care

OBJECTIVE

We evaluate the quality of interventional care for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using a set of quality indicators.

METHODS

We developed an initial list of quality indicators by incorporating current guidelines, observing practice discrepancies, and basing it on the Donabedian "structure, process, and outcome" three-dimensional quality evaluation model as the framework. The Delphi method was utilized in two rounds of consultation involving 31 experts to evaluate and revise indicators at all levels.

RESULTS

The response rate of expert questionnaires was 100% for both rounds, and the expert authority coefficients were 0.913 and 0.940, respectively. The Kendall harmony coefficients were 0.221 and 0.195, respectively, with P < 0.05. Eventually, a quality evaluation system of interventional care for patients undergoing TAVR was constructed, consisting of three structural indicators, nine process indicators, and 42 outcome indicators.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality evaluation system for interventional care of TAVR sought to establish specific, objective, and quantifiable criteria for assessing the quality of care. It is recommended to apply the set of quality indicators across hospitals to enhance the quality of care for TAVR.

Risk Factors for Hospital Readmission Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in the Contemporary Era: A Systematic Review

Background

Despite transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) becoming a widely accepted therapeutic option for the management of aortic stenosis, post-procedure readmission rates remain high. Rehospitalization is associated with negative patient outcomes, as well as increased healthcare costs, and has therefore been identified as an important target for quality improvement. Strategies to reduce the post-TAVI readmission rate are needed but require the identification of patients at high risk for rehospitalization. Our systematic review aims to identify predictors of post-procedure readmission in patients eligible for TAVI.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive search of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases for the time period from 2015 to the present for articles evaluating risk factors for rehospitalization post-TAVI with a follow-up period of at least 30 days in adults age ≥ 70 years with aortic stenosis. The quality of included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We present the results as a qualitative narrative review.

Results

We identified 49 studies involving 828,528 patients. Post-TAVI readmission is frequent, and rates vary (14.9% to 54.3% at 1 year). The most-frequent predictors identified for both 30-day and 1-year post-TAVI readmission are atrial fibrillation, lung disease, renal disease, diabetes mellitus, in-hospital life-threatening bleeding, and non-femoral access.

Conclusions

This systematic review identifies the most-common predictors for 30-day and 1-year readmission post-TAVI, including comorbidities and potentially modifiable procedural approaches and complications. These predictors can be used to identify patients at high-risk for readmission who are most likely to benefit from increased support and follow-up post-TAVI.

Hospital variation of 30-day readmission rate following transcatheter aortic valve implantation

OBJECTIVES

Thirty-day readmission rate is one of the hospital quality metrics. Outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have improved significantly, but it remains unclear whether hospital-level variance in 30-day readmission rate exists in the contemporary TAVI era.

METHODS

From the 2017 US Nationwide Readmission Database, endovascular TAVI were identified. The unadjusted 30-day readmission rate and 30-day risk-standardised readmission rate (RSRR) were calculated and we then conducted model testing to determine the relative contribution of hospital characteristics, patient-level covariates and economic status to the variation in readmission rates observed between the hospitals.

RESULTS

A total of 44 899 TAVI from 338 hospitals were identified. The range of unadjusted 30-day readmission rate and 30-day RSRR was 2.0%-33.3% and 9.4%-15.3%, respectively. Median 30-day RSRR was 11.8% and there was a significant hospital-level variation (median OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.32, p<0.01) and this was similar in both readmissions caused due to major cardiac and non-cardiac conditions. Patient, hospital and economic factors accounted for 9.6%, 1.9% and 3.8% of the variability in hospital readmission rate, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There was significant hospital-level variation in 30-day RSRR following TAVI. Further measures are required to mitigate this variance in the readmission rate.

Profiling Hospital Performance on the Basis of Readmission After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Ontario, Canada

Background

Readmission rates are a widely accepted quality indicator. Our objective was to develop models for calculating case‐mixed adjusted readmission rates after transcatheter aortic valve replacement for the purpose of profiling hospitals.

Methods and Results

In this population‐based study in Ontario, Canada, we identified all transcatheter aortic valve replacement procedures between April 1, 2012, and March 31, 2016. For each hospital, we first calculated 30‐day and 1‐year risk‐standardized (predicted versus expected) readmission rates, using 2‐level hierarchical logistic regression models, including clustering of patients within hospitals. We also calculated the risk‐adjusted (observed versus expected) readmission rates, accounting for the competing risk of death using a Fine‐Gray competing risk model. We categorized hospitals into 3 groups: those performing worse than expected, those performing better than expected, or those performing as expected, on the basis of whether the 95% CI was above, below, or included the provincial average readmission rate respectively. Our cohort consisted of 2129 transcatheter aortic valve replacement procedures performed at 10 hospitals. The observed readmission rate was 15.4% at 30 days and 44.2% at 1 year, with a range of 10.9% to 21.7% and 38.8% to 55.0%, respectively, across hospitals. Incorporating the competing risk of death translated into meaningful different results between models; as such, we concluded that the risk‐adjusted readmission rate was the preferred metric. On the basis of the 30‐day risk‐adjusted readmission rate, all hospitals performed as expected, with a 95% CI that included the provincial average. However, we found that there was significant variation in 1‐year risk‐adjusted readmission rate.

Conclusions

There is significant interhospital variation in 1‐year adjusted readmission rates among hospitals, suggesting that this should be a focus for quality improvement efforts in transcatheter aortic valve replacement.