Severe Acute Stent Malapposition After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: Effects on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes

Safety and efficacy of systematic lesion preparation with a novel generation scoring balloon in complex percutaneous interventions: results from a prospective registry

BACKGROUND

Coronary lesions predilatation with semicompliant (SC) or non-compliant balloons (NC) may be insufficient to obtain an optimal stent expansion, which can lead to in-stent restenosis or thrombosis. Moreover, increasing evidence supporting an optimal lesion preparation is mandatory when drug coated balloons (DCB) are used. To this extent, more "aggressive tools" such as cutting/scoring balloons, atherectomy or lithotripsy may play an important role and improve outcomes.

METHODS

We enrolled 78 consecutive patients from March 2020 to October 2020 with calcific/fibrotic or ostially-located lesions, which were prepared using scoring balloons, in addition to SC/NC balloons and other plaque modification strategies. The final treatment consisted in either stent or DCB usage. The primary endpoint was the rate of clinically-driven target lesion revascularization. Secondary endpoints entailed the procedural success and the individual rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 12 months.

RESULTS

Most of the patients had left main (LM) or ostial lesions, 65% of them being moderate/severely calcified, with further debulking strategies being required in 15 (19.2%) patients (rotational atherectomy, 3.8% or coronary intravascular lithotripsy, 15.3%). A high-rate of DCB usage was reported. Angiographic and procedural success was obtained in 77 and 76 patients, respectively. We encountered one vessel perforation, which was sealed with a covered stent, without consequence. During follo- up, we observed only 6 MACE, 6 target lesion revascularizations (TLR) and 2 cardiovascular deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with high complexity and calcific lesions, an optimal lesion preparation using a dedicated scoring balloon was associated with low clinical events at mid-term follow-up and may be considered to improve immediate procedural success rate.

Malapposed Struts with Cre8, Biomatrix, and Xience Stents Assessed with OCT Immediately after Implantation and at 6-Month Follow-Up: Can the Different Biomechanical Characteristics of the Three Stents Impact on Struts Malapposition?

Background. Although the clinical effects of stent malapposition remain controversial, several analyses of stent registries consistently have found that malapposed struts were frequently identified in patients who experienced stent thrombosis. In this study, which is a subanalysis of the previously published CREBX-OCT study, we compared optical coherence tomography (OCT) analysis at the index percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and at six-month follow-up in 37 patients randomly assigned to receive, by a single operator, three different second-generation drug-eluting stents (Cre8, Biomatrix, and Xience) aiming to clarify if the malapposition observed at six-month follow-up was persistent or late-acquired. Moreover, we investigated if there were some differences in the behavior of the three different kinds of stents in relation to the struts malapposition. Material and Methods. We analyzed 614 and 599 cross sections and 5514 and 5377 struts at the index PCI and at six-month follow-up, respectively. The qualitative analysis of the plaque composition among the three groups did not show significant differences. Results. The lumen area did not significantly change from the index procedure to the six-month follow-up in the three groups; on the contrary, the number of malapposed struts increased significantly in the Cre8 and Biomatrix groups but not in the Xience group: 0.58 ± 1.51 and 3.29 ± 5.33 ( $p<0.023$ ) in the Cre8 group, 0.55 ± 1.81 and 1.73 ± 2.28 ( $p<0.024$ ) in the Biomatrix group, and 0.55 ± 1.5 and 0.25 ± 0.87 ( $p<0.166$ ) in the Xience group, respectively. Conclusions. Therefore, the malapposition observed at six-month follow-up in our study population could be mainly considered as acquired and attributable to biomechanical reasons due to the structural differences among the three stents. This trial is registered with Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT02850497.

Micro Optical Coherence Tomography for Coronary Imaging

Intravascular optical coherence tomography (IVOCT) that produces images with 10 μm resolution has emerged as a significant technology for evaluating coronary architectural morphology. Yet, many features that are relevant to coronary plaque pathogenesis can only be seen at the cellular level. This issue has motivated the development of a next-generation form of OCT imaging that offers higher resolution. One such technology that we review here is termed micro-OCT (μOCT) that enables the assessment of the cellular and subcellular morphology of human coronary atherosclerotic plaques. This chapter reviews recent advances and ongoing works regarding μOCT in the field of cardiology. This new technology has the potential to provide researchers and clinicians with a tool to better understand the natural history of coronary atherosclerosis, increase plaque progression prediction capabilities, and better assess the vessel healing process after revascularization therapy.

Long-term Clinical Outcomes of Drug-Eluting Stent Malapposition

Previous pathologic, intravascular imaging, and clinical studies have investigated the association between adverse cardiac events and stent malapposition, including acute stent malapposition (ASM, that is detected at index procedure) and late stent malapposition (LSM, that is detected during follow-up) that can be further classified into late-persistent stent malapposition (LPSM, ASM that remains at follow-up) or late-acquired stent malapposition (LASM, newly developed stent malapposition at follow-up that was not present immediately after index stent implantation). ASM has not been associated with adverse cardiac events compared with non-ASM, even in lesions with large-sized malapposition. The clinical outcomes of LSM may depend on its subtype. The recent intravascular ultrasound studies with long-term follow-up have consistently demonstrated that LASM steadily increased the risk of thrombotic events in patients with first-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs). This association has not yet been identified in LPSM. Accordingly, it is reasonable that approaches to stent malapposition should be based on its relationship with clinical outcomes. ASM may be tolerable after successful stent implantation, whereas prolonged anti-thrombotic medications and/or percutaneous interventions to modify LASM may be considered in selected patients with first-generation DESs. However, these treatments are still questionable due to lack of firm evidences.

Vulnerable struts with CRE8, Biomatrix and Xience stents assessed with OCT and their correlation with clinical variables at 6-month follow-up: the CREBX-OCT study

First-generation drug eluting stents (DES) reduced the incidence of restenosis and need for repeated target lesion revascularization but, in autoptic studies, frequently resulted in incomplete endothelial coverage, which is an important predictor of late adverse events and increased mortality after stent implantation. More recently, not only uncovered, but also malapposed or protruding struts have been considered vulnerable structures, as they are deemed to perturb blood flow, whereas only struts well embedded into the vessel wall are considered stable. We compared the number of uncovered and of other vulnerable (protruding or malapposed) struts among three different second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) (Cre8, Biomatrix, Xience), using optical coherence tomography (OCT) 6 months after implantation. Moreover, we analyzed the relationship between the percentage of vulnerable struts and the clinical characteristics of patients. 60 patients with stable angina or non-ST-Elevation acute coronary syndrome and indication to percutaneous angioplasty were randomly assigned to receive one of the three DES. After 6 months, OCT images were obtained. After 6 months, OCT images were obtained (1289 cross sections; 10,728 struts). None of the three DES showed non-coated struts or areas of stent thrombosis. Significant differences in the average number of protruding struts (Cre8: 33.9 ± 12.6; Biomatrix: 26.2 ± 18.1; Xience: 13.2 ± 8.5; p < 0.001) and in the proportion of malapposed struts (Cre8: 0.7%; Biomatrix: 0.9%; Xience: 0.0%; p = 0.040) and of incomplete stent apposition area (Cre8: 10.4%; Biomatrix: 4.7%; Xience: 0.7%; p < 0.001) were observed. No significant difference was found in neointimal hyperplasia area with a not significant tendency toward greater minimal and maximal struts thickness for Biomatrix. In comparison with Cre8 and Biomatrix, Xience showed a significantly lower proportion of vulnerable struts in all clinical sub-groups considered. In the group of 60 patients a significant relation was found between age and number of vulnerable struts (p = 0.014). The three second-generation DES were similarly effective in permitting neo-intimal formation and complete struts coating 6 months after implantation, but Cre8 and Biomatrix showed a greater proportion of protruding and malapposed struts.Trail Registry: Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT02850497.

Severe Acute Stent Malapposition After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: Effects on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes

Background

The effects of severe acute stent malapposition (ASM) after drug‐eluting stent implantation on long‐term clinical outcomes are not clearly understood. We evaluated long‐term clinical outcomes of severe ASM using optical coherence tomography.

Methods and Results

We pooled patient‐ and lesion‐level data from 6 randomized studies. Five studies investigated follow‐up drug‐eluting stent strut coverage and one investigated ASM. In this data set, a total of 436 patients with 444 lesions underwent postintervention optical coherence tomography examination and these data were included in the analysis. Severe ASM was defined as lesions with ≥400 μm of maximum malapposed distance or ≥1 mm of maximum malapposed length. Composite events (cardiac death, target lesion–related myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and stent thrombosis) were compared between patients with and without severe ASM. The postintervention optical coherence tomography findings indicated that 62 (14.2%) patients had lesions with ≥400 μm of maximum malapposed distance and 186 (42.7%) patients had lesions with ≥1 mm of maximum malapposed length. The 5‐year clinical follow‐up was completed in 371 (86.1%) of the eligible 431 patients. The cumulative rate of composite events was similar among the patients in each group during 5‐year follow‐up: 3.3% in patients with ASM ≥400 μm of maximum malapposed distance versus 3.1% in those with no ASM or ASM <400 μm of maximum malapposed distance (P=0.89), and 1.2% in patients with ASM ≥1 mm of maximum malapposed length versus 4.6% in those with no ASM or ASM <1 mm of maximum malapposed length (P=0.06).

Conclusions

During the 5‐year follow‐up, ASM severity was not associated with long‐term clinical outcomes in patients treated with drug‐eluting stents.