Development of a Novel Adult Congenital Heart Disease-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Metric

Placing patient-reported outcomes at the centre of cardiovascular clinical practice: implications for quality of care and management

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide important insights into patients' own perspectives about their health and medical condition, and there is evidence that their use can lead to improvements in the quality of care and to better-informed clinical decisions. Their application in cardiovascular populations has grown over the past decades. This statement describes what PROs are, and it provides an inventory of disease-specific and domain-specific PROs that have been developed for cardiovascular populations. International standards and quality indices have been published, which can guide the selection of PROs for clinical practice and in clinical trials and research; patients as well as experts in psychometrics should be involved in choosing which are most appropriate. Collaborations are needed to define criteria for using PROs to guide regulatory decisions, and the utility of PROs for comparing and monitoring the quality of care and for allocating resources should be evaluated. New sources for recording PROs include wearable digital health devices, medical registries, and electronic health record. Advice is given for the optimal use of PROs in shared clinical decision-making in cardiovascular medicine, and concerning future directions for their wider application.

China Health Related Outcomes Measures (CHROME): development of a descriptive system to support cardiovascular disease specific preference-based measure for the Chinese population

PURPOSE

Preference-based measures have been increasingly recommended to measure health outcomes for economic evaluation. However, none of existing cardiovascular disease (CVD)-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments are preference-based. This study aimed to develop the descriptive system of preference-based HRQoL instrument for Chinese patients with CVDs under the Initiative of China Health Related Outcomes Measures (CHROME).

METHODS

Qualitative face-to-face interviews were conducted with Chinese patients with CVDs. Content analysis was employed to generate candidate items for the instrument. Then expert consultation and cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted to guide further selection and revision of the items.

RESULTS

We interviewed 127 CVD patients with 67.7% being male and 63.8% living in the urban area. A hierarchical code book comprised of four themes, 20 categories, 62 sub-categories, and 207 codes, was developed. Candidate items were selected based on the criteria set by the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) methodology and ISPOR PRO guidance. An online survey and meeting with an expert advisory panel (n = 15) followed by cognitive debriefing interviews with 20 patients and 13 physicians were conducted to further select and revise the candidate items. The descriptive system of CHROME-CVD consists of 14 items, namely frequency and severity of chest pain, chest tightness, palpitation, shortness of breath, dizziness, fatigue, appetite, sleeping, mobility, daily activities, depression, worry, and social relationship. Four or five level responses were selected based on cognitive debriefing results to each item.

CONCLUSION

The current study developed the descriptive system (items and response options) of CHROME-CVD, the future CVD-specific preference-based HRQoL instrument for Chinese CVD patients.

Patient-reported outcome measures in cardiovascular disease

In today's medical ecosystem, it is vital to measure the outcomes that are most important to the patients. As such, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) can be an essential metric to deliver high-quality cardiovascular care, particularly in the subset of patients who remain disappointed with their outcomes. PROMS should be a reproducible and reflective report of what is fundamental to a patient over time and across treatments with proper standards in the analysis, interpretation, and reporting of the collected data. These reports can also be sensitive to changes, whether improvements or deteriorations in the quality of care and medical attitude, but a lack of standardization makes it difficult to draw robust conclusions and compare findings across treatments. As a research tool, PROMS can have a significant prognostic prominence, offering a powerful instrument of comparison between different treatment modalities. With the information technology (IT) abilities of today, we can leverage mobile tools and powerful computer systems to perform sophisticated data analysis using patient-derived data and randomization. This may eliminate guesswork and generate impactful metrics to better inform the decision-making process. PROMS analysed by proper standardized algorithms can avoid physician bias and be integrated into the hospital teamwork. Therefore, there is a strong need for integration of PROMS into the evaluation of cardiovascular interventions and procedures, and establishment of international standards in the analyses of patient-reported outcomes and quality of life data to address this need and develop therapeutic recommendations.

Rationale, design and methodology of APPROACH-IS II: International study of patient-reported outcomes and frailty phenotyping in adults with congenital heart disease

BACKGROUND

In recent years, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have received increasing prominence in cardiovascular research and clinical care. An understanding of the variability and global experience of PROs in adults with congenital heart disease (CHD), however, is still lacking. Moreover, information on epidemiological characteristics and the frailty phenotype of older adults with CHD is minimal. The APPROACH-IS II study was established to address these knowledge gaps. This paper presents the design and methodology of APPROACH-IS II.

METHODS/DESIGN

APPROACH-IS II is a cross-sectional global multicentric study that includes Part 1 (assessing PROs) and Part 2 (investigating the frailty phenotype of older adults). With 53 participating centers, located in 32 countries across six continents, the aim is to enroll 8000 patients with CHD. In Part 1, self-report surveys are used to collect data on PROs (e.g., quality of life, perceived health, depressive symptoms, autonomy support), and explanatory variables (e.g., social support, stigma, illness identity, empowerment). In Part 2, the cognitive functioning and frailty phenotype of older adults are measured using validated assessments.

DISCUSSION

APPROACH-IS II will generate a rich dataset representing the international experience of individuals in adult CHD care. The results of this project will provide a global view of PROs and the frailty phenotype of adults with CHD and will thereby address important knowledge gaps. Undoubtedly, the project will contribute to the overarching aim of improving optimal living and care provision for adults with CHD.

Quality of life and other patient-reported outcomes across the lifespan among people with Fontan palliation

Traditional congenital heart disease (CHD) outcomes include mortality (survival to adulthood and life expectancy) as well as cardiac and non-cardiac morbidity. Strategies to identify and manage sequelae have primarily focused on objective data obtained though invasive and non-invasive diagnostic approaches. In contrast, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide subjective information, using standardized measures, about patients' health and wellbeing as reported directly by patients, without interpretation, interference, or assumptions made by clinicians or others. Selection of PRO measures entails thoughtful consideration of who the individuals being surveyed are, why assessment is occurring (e.g., what are the domains of interest; clinical vs. research), and what processes are in place for acquisition, administration, interpretation, and response. In this review, we focus on three domains of PROs for pediatric and adult patients with Fontan physiology: physical health status, psychological functioning, and quality of life (QOL). Infants, children, adolescents, and adults with CHD face a spectrum of challenges that may influence PROs across the lifespan. In general, patients with Fontan palliation tend to have lower physical health status, experience more psychological distress, and have equivalent or reduced QOL compared to healthy peers. Herein, we provide an overview of PROs among people with Fontan circulation as a group, yet simultaneously emphasize that the optimal way to understand the experiences of any individual patient is to ask and listen. We also offer clinical and research initiatives to improve the adoption and utility of PROs in CHD settings, which demonstrate commitment to capturing, understanding, and responding to the patient voice.

Factors associated with a lower chance of having gaps in care in adult congenital heart disease

BACKGROUND

To promote good health in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD), prevention of gaps in care is essential, as adverse prognosis is associated with care gaps. A well-organised, formal transition programme may help prevent loss to follow up after leaving paediatric care. To inform the development of a transition programme, we investigated factors associated with care gaps in adults with CHD.

METHODS

Between 15 October 2018 and 15 November 2019 data on patient characteristics and patient experiences with transition-related education, difficulties, and gaps in care were collected and assessed in 87 adults with CHD. Two groups (with gaps in care versus without gaps) were compared to identify informative differences using chi-squared, Fisher's exact tests, or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. To assess the relationship between care gaps and identified variables, factors with significant difference (p < 0.05) in bivariate analyses were employed as covariates in multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

About half of the study cohort reported having gaps in care. In a multivariate model, patients having thorough discussion about the importance of receiving adult care in paediatric care were 70% less likely to experience gaps (odds ratio 0.303, 95% CI 0.14, 0.66). Forty-seven percent of patient-perceived barriers to transitioning originated from negative feelings associated with transfer.

CONCLUSION

Gaps in care are highly prevalent in adults with CHD. For a transition programme to be most effective, curriculum development may need to consider the differential impact of various factors and target areas to mitigate the psychological stress associated with transfer.

Metabolomic Profiling of Adults with Congenital Heart Disease

Metabolomic analysis may provide an integrated assessment in genetically and pathologically heterogeneous populations. We used metabolomic analysis to gain mechanistic insight into the small and diverse population of adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD). Consecutive ACHD patients seen at a single institution were enrolled. Clinical variables and whole blood were collected at regular clinical visits. Stored plasma samples were analyzed for the concentrations of 674 metabolites and metabolic markers using mass spectrometry with internal standards. These samples were compared to 28 simultaneously assessed healthy non-ACHD controls. Principal component analysis and multivariable regression modeling were used to identify metabolites associated with clinical outcomes in ACHD. Plasma from ACHD and healthy control patients differed in the concentrations of multiple metabolites. Differences between control and ACHD were greater in number and in degree than those between ACHD anatomic groups. A metabolite cluster containing amino acids and metabolites of amino acids correlated with negative clinical outcomes across all anatomic groups. Metabolites in the arginine metabolic pathway, betaine, dehydroepiandrosterone, cystine, 1-methylhistidine, serotonin and bile acids were associated with specific clinical outcomes. Metabolic markers of disease may both be useful as biomarkers for disease activity and suggest etiologically related pathways as possible targets for disease-modifying intervention.

Development of an international standard set of clinical and patient-reported outcomes for children and adults with congenital heart disease: a report from the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement Congenital Heart Disease Working Group

AIMS

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common congenital malformation. Despite the worldwide burden to patient wellbeing and health system resource utilization, tracking of long-term outcomes is lacking, limiting the delivery and measurement of high-value care. To begin transitioning to value-based healthcare in CHD, the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement aligned an international collaborative of CHD experts, patient representatives, and other stakeholders to construct a standard set of outcomes and risk-adjustment variables that are meaningful to patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The primary aim was to identify a minimum standard set of outcomes to be used by health systems worldwide. The methodological process included four key steps: (i) develop a working group representative of all CHD stakeholders; (ii) conduct extensive literature reviews to identify scope, outcomes of interest, tools used to measure outcomes, and case-mix adjustment variables; (iii) create the outcome set using a series of multi-round Delphi processes; and (iv) disseminate set worldwide. The Working Group established a 15-item outcome set, incorporating physical, mental, social, and overall health outcomes accompanied by tools for measurement and case-mix adjustment variables. Patients with any CHD diagnoses of all ages are included. Following an open review process, over 80% of patients and providers surveyed agreed with the set in its final form.

CONCLUSION

This is the first international development of a stakeholder-informed standard set of outcomes for CHD. It can serve as a first step for a lifespan outcomes measurement approach to guide benchmarking and improvement among health systems.

Development of a Novel Adult Congenital Heart Disease-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Metric

Background Patient-reported outcome metrics (PROs) quantify important outcomes in clinical trials and can be sensitive measures of patient experience in clinical practice. Currently, there is no validated disease-specific PRO for adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD). Methods and Results We conducted a preliminary psychometric validation of a novel ACHD PRO. ACHD patients were recruited prospectively from 2 institutions and completed a series of questionnaires, a physician health assessment, and a 6-minute walk test. Participants returned to complete the same questionnaires and assessment 3 months±2 weeks later. We tested the internal consistency and test-retest reliability by comparing responses among clinically stable patients at the 2 study visits. We assessed convergent and divergent validity by comparison of ACHD PRO responses to existing validated questionnaires. We assessed responsiveness by comparison with patient-reported clinical change. One hundred three patients completed 1 study visit and 81 completed both. The ACHD PRO demonstrated good internal consistency in each of its 5 domains (Cronbach's α: 0.87; 0.74; 0.74; 0.90; and 0.89, respectively) and in the overall summary score (0.92). Test-retest reliability was good with an intraclass correlation ≥0.73 for all domains and 0.78 for the Summary Score. The ACHD PRO accurately assessed domain concepts based on comparison with validated standards. Preliminary estimates of responsiveness suggest sensitivity to clinical status. Conclusions These studies provide initial support for the validity and reliability of the ACHD PRO. Further studies are needed to assess its sensitivity to changes in clinical status.