Additional Low-Voltage-Area Ablation in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Results of the Randomized Controlled VOLCANO Trial

Low-Voltage Area Ablation in Addition to Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Low-voltage area (LVA) ablation, in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), has been proposed as a new strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but clinical trials have shown conflicting results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of LVA ablation in patient undergoing AF ablation (PROSPERO-registered CRD42024537696). Methods: Randomized clinical trials investigating the role of LVA ablation in addition to PVI in patients with AF were searched on PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to 22 April 2024. Primary outcome was atrial arrhythmia recurrence after the first AF ablation procedure. Secondary endpoints included procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and procedure-related complication rate. Sensitivity analysis including only patients with LVA demonstration at mapping and multiple subgroups analyses were also performed. Results: 1547 patients from 7 studies were included. LVA ablation in addition to PVI reduced atrial arrhythmia recurrence (odds ratio [OR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.81, p < 0.001) with a number needed to treat to prevent recurrence of 10. No difference in procedure time (mean difference [MD] -5.32 min, 95% CI -19.01-8.46 min, p = 0.45), fluoroscopy time (MD -1.10 min, 95% CI -2.48-0.28 min, p = 0.12) and complication rate (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.40-1.61, p = 0.54) was observed. Consistent results were demonstrated when considering only patients with LVA during mapping and in prespecified subgroups for AF type (paroxysmal vs. persistent), multicentric vs. monocentric trial, and ablation strategy in control group. Conclusions: In patients with AF, ablation of LVAs in addition to PVI reduces atrial arrhythmia recurrence without a significant increase in procedure time, fluoroscopy time, or complication rate.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

Elevated liver fibrosis-4 index predicts recurrence after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure

BACKGROUND

The fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index is a noninvasive scoring system that is used to assess the progression of liver fibrosis. This study aimed to assess whether the FIB-4 index is associated with recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation in patients with and without heart failure (HF).

METHODS

We included 1,184 patients who underwent initial AF catheter ablation between 2016 and 2021. The patients were classified into low-risk (< 1.3), intermediate-risk (1.3-2.67), and high-risk (> 2.67) groups based on their FIB-4 indices at baseline. The patients were divided into HF (n = 552) and non-HF groups (n = 632); the HF group was further divided into paroxysmal AF (PAF) and non-PAF groups. AF recurrence after catheter ablation was then compared among the groups.

RESULTS

In the non-HF group, no significant differences in recurrence after ablation were observed between the low-(n = 219), intermediate-(n = 364), and high-risk (n = 49) groups. In contrast, in the HF group, the intermediate-(n = 341) and high-risk (n = 112) groups had significantly higher recurrence rates than the low-risk group (n = 99) (log-rank test, p = 0.005). This association remained significant after multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR]:1.374; p = 0.027). The FIB-4 index increased incrementally as the brain natriuretic peptide levels and severity of tricuspid regurgitation increased. The FIB-4 index was an independent predictor of recurrence in the non-PAF HF group (HR:1.498; p = 0.007) but not in the PAF group.

CONCLUSIONS

The FIB-4 index may be a useful predictor of AF recurrence after catheter ablation in patients with HF, particularly in those with non-PAF.

Sex difference in atrial scar prevalence: What can we learn from the STABLE-SR-III trial?

BACKGROUND

Female sex has long been recognized to present a higher risk of stroke and atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) than in males. However, the underlying mechanisms and benefits of additional low-voltage area (LVA) modification in women remain unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in atrial substrate and efficacy of additive LVA ablation between sex subgroups.

METHODS

Patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) aged 65-80 years were randomly assigned to either CPVI plus LVA modification (STABLE-SR) group or CPVI alone group. The primary outcome was freedom from atrial arrhythmias after a single ablation procedure.

RESULTS

Of 414 patients included in STABLE-SR-III, 204 (49.3%) were women (mean age 70.5 ± 4.7 years). Women demonstrated significantly higher LVA prevalence (51.5% vs 32.9%; P <.001) and LVA burden (6.5% vs 2.9%; P <.001) than men. In the STABLE-SR group, additional LVA ablation was associated with a 63% reduction in recurrence for women compared with the CPVI alone group (10.8% vs 29.4%; adjusted hazard ratio 0.37; 95% confidence interval 0.18-0.75; P for interaction = .040). However, this finding was not observed in men (18.7% vs 18.5%). In the female subgroup, both group 1 (CPVI + LVA modification) and group 3 (CPVI alone in females without LVA) had similar clinical outcomes, which were much better than in Group 2 (CPVI alone in women with LVA) (90% vs 83.8% vs 63.6%; P = .003).

CONCLUSION

In older patients with PAF, women demonstrated more advanced atrial substrate, including higher prevalence and burden of LVA compared with men. Women may receive greater benefit from additional LVA modification than men.

Adjunctive low-voltage area ablation for patients with atrial fibrillation: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of adjunctive low-voltage area (LVA) ablation on outcomes of catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) remains uncertain.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CA with versus without LVA ablation for patients with AF. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled with a random-effects model. Our primary endpoint was recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA), including AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia. We used R version 4.3.1 for all statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis included 10 RCTs encompassing 1780 patients, of whom 890 (50%) were randomized to LVA ablation. Adjunctive LVA ablation significantly reduced recurrence of ATA (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.67-0.88; p < .01) and reduced the number of redo ablation procedures (RR 0.54; 95% CI 0.35-0.85; p < .01), as compared with conventional ablation. Among 691 (43%) patients with documented LVAs on baseline substrate mapping, adjunctive LVA ablation substantially reduced ATA recurrences (RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.38-0.86; p < .01). There was no significant difference between groups in terms of periprocedural adverse events (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.39-1.56; p = .49).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunctive LVA ablation is an effective and safe strategy for reducing recurrences of ATA among patients who undergo CA for AF.

Atrial fibrillation cycle-length (AF-CL) inside the pulmonary veins predicts paroxysmal AF ablation success- the INDUCE-AF study

BACKGROUND

A novel method to measure atrial fibrillation cycle length (AF-CL) was recently described, based on the average of 10 consecutive signals (FARS10). FARS10 accurately identified pulmonary vein isolation (PVI)-responders among patients with persistent AF. Whether this method is applicable to patients with paroxysmal AF is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic value of FARS10 measurements in patients with paroxysmal AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We enrolled paroxysmal AF patients undergoing PVI in a prospective multicenter study. After AF induction with a standardized protocol, the AF-CL was measured using FARS-10 method. The primary endpoint was AF/AT-recurrence. One-hundred and four patients were included (61 ± 14 years, 25% females). After a mean follow-up of 12 ± 4 months, AF/AT recurrence rate was 20%. The fastest PV CL (fPV-CL) was independently associated with the primary endpoint at multivariate analysis (HR 1.02, p < 0.001). Every 10 ms increase in fPV-CL, AF recurrences increased by 20%. The value of 160 ms was found to be the optimal cut-off (specificity 81%, sensitivity 76%). Patients with fPV-CL < 160 ms experienced lower AF recurrences as compared to patients with fPV-CL > 160 ms (8% vs. 32% at 1 year; HR = 0.17, p < 0.001). Progression to persistent AF was observed in 13% of patients with fPV-CL > 160 ms.

CONCLUSION

fPV-CL measured with the FARS-10 method accurately predicts PVI success in paroxysmal AF patients undergoing PVI. Patients with slow PV activity (fPV-CL > 160 ms) experience higher AF recurrence rate after PVI and more frequent progression to persistent AF.

Atrial structural remodeling and atrial fibrillation substrate: A histopathological perspective

Atrial fibrillation (AF) substrate progresses with the advancement of atrial structural remodeling, resulting in AF perpetuation and recurrence. Although fibrosis is considered a hallmark of atrial structural remodeling, the histological background has not been fully elucidated because obtaining atrial specimens is difficult, especially in patients not undergoing open-heart surgery. Bipolar voltage reduction evaluated using electroanatomic mapping during AF ablation is considered a surrogate marker for the progression of structural remodeling; however, histological validation is lacking. We developed an intracardiac echocardiography-guided endomyocardial atrial biopsy technique to evaluate atrial structural remodeling in patients undergoing catheter ablation for nonvalvular AF. The histological factors associated with a decrease in bipolar voltage were interstitial fibrosis, as well as an increase in myocardial intercellular space preceding fibrosis, myofibrillar loss, and a decrease in cardiomyocyte nuclear density, which is a surrogate marker for cardiomyocyte density. Cardiomyocyte hypertrophy is closely associated with a decrease in cardiomyocyte nuclear density, suggesting that hypertrophic changes compensate for cardiomyocyte loss. Electron microscopy also revealed that increased intercellular spaces indicated the leakage of plasma components owing to increased vascular permeability. Additionally, amyloid deposition was observed in 4 % of biopsy cases. Only increased intercellular space and interstitial fibrosis were significantly higher for long-standing persistent AF than for paroxysmal AF and associated with recurrence after AF ablation, suggesting that this interstitial remodeling is the AF substrate. An increase in intercellular space that occurs early in AF formation is a therapeutic target for the AF substrate, which prevents irreversible interstitial degeneration due to collagen accumulation. This endomyocardial atrial biopsy technique will allow the collection of atrial tissue from a wide variety of patients and significantly facilitate the elucidation of the mechanisms of atrial cardiomyopathy, structural remodeling, and AF substrates.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

Repeat catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is an established therapy that reduces AF burden, improves quality of life, and reduces the risks of cardiovascular outcomes. Although there are clear guidelines for the application of de novo catheter ablation, there is less evidence to guide recommendations for repeat catheter ablation in patients who experience recurrent AF. In this review, we examine the rationale for repeat ablation, mechanisms of recurrence, patient selection, optimal timing, and procedural strategies. We discuss additional important considerations, including treatment of comorbidities and risk factors, risk of complications, and effectiveness. Mechanisms of recurrent AF are often due to non-pulmonary vein (non-PV) triggers; however, there is insufficient evidence supporting the routine use of empiric lesion sets during repeat ablation. The emergence of pulsed field ablation may alter the safety and effectiveness of de novo and repeat ablation. Extrapolation of data from randomized trials of de novo ablation does not optimally inform efficacy in cases of redo ablation. Additional large, randomized controlled trials are needed to address important clinical questions regarding procedural strategies and timing of repeat ablation.

Prognostic impact of atrial cardiomyopathy: Long-term follow-up of patients with and without low-voltage areas following atrial fibrillation ablation

BACKGROUND

Atrial cardiomyopathy is known as an underlying pathophysiological factor in the majority of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Left atrial low-voltage areas (LVAs) are reported to coincide with fibrosis and likely represent atrial cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to delineate differences in the long-term prognosis of patients stratified by the size of LVAs.

METHODS

This observational study included 1488 consecutive patients undergoing initial ablation for AF. LVAs were defined as regions with a bipolar peak-to-peak voltage <0.50 mV. The total study population was divided into 3 groups stratified by LVA size: patients with no LVAs (n = 1136); those with small (<20 cm2) LVAs (n = 250) LVAs; and those with extensive (≥20 cm2) LVAs (n = 102). Composite endpoints of death, heart failure, and stroke were followed for up to 5 years.

RESULTS

Composite endpoints developed in 105 of 1488 patients (7.1%), and AF recurrence occurred in 410 (27.6%). Composite endpoints developed more frequently in the order of patients with extensive LVAs (19.1%), small LVAs (10.8%), and no LVAs (5.1%) (P for trend <.0001). Multivariable analysis revealed that LVA presence was independently associated with higher incidence of composite endpoints, irrespective of AF recurrence (modified hazard ratio 1.73; 95% confidence interval 1.13-2.64; P = .011) CONCLUSION: LVA presence and its extent both were associated with poor long-term composite endpoints of death, heart failure, and stroke, irrespective of AF recurrence or other confounders. Underlying atrial cardiomyopathy seems to define a poor prognosis after AF ablation.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Slow conduction velocity predicts atrial fibrillation recurrence after radiofrequency ablation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the progression of electrophysiological phenomena in atrial fibrillation (AF) and elucidate the association between the left atrial conduction velocity (LACV) and AF recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation.

METHODS

A total of 188 AF patients (121 paroxysmal AF and 67 persistent AF) who underwent PVI for the first time were enrolled in this prospective study. The left atrium was mapped using a 20-pole electrode catheter combined with the CARTO3 system. The conduction distances and conduction times of the left atrium from the Bachmann bundle area to the mitral isthmus were calculated. Anterior, posterior, and septal LACV were calculated as conduction distance divided by conduction time.

RESULTS

The anterior, posterior, and septal LACVs in the AF recurrence group were slower than those in the nonrecurrence group (anterior: 0.807 [0.766, 0.848] and 1.048 [1.000, 1.093] m/s, p < .05; posterior: 1.037 [0.991, 1.084] vs. 1.315 [1.249, 1.380] m/s, p < .05; septal: 0.904 [0.862, 0.946] vs. 1.163 [1.107, 1.219] m/s, p < .05). The best cut-off value of anterior LACV for predicting AF recurrence was 0.887 m/s (sensitivity 73.9% and specificity 76.5%). Multivariate analysis showed slow anterior LACV <0.887 m/s was an independent predictor of AF recurrence with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.42 (1.04, 1.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Slowing conduction velocity is a predictor of AF recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation.

Ratio of P-Wave Duration to P-Wave Amplitude and Left Atrial Remodeling: Insights from Electrophysiological Findings and Myocardial Injury After Cryoballoon Ablation

The impact of the P-wave morphology on clinical outcomes postcatheter ablation (post-CA) and recurrent arrhythmia characteristics or electrophysiologic findings in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) remains unclear. Patients with PAF who underwent cryoballoon ablation were enrolled. In 12-lead electrocardiography recorded within 1 month before CA, the P-wave duration (Pd) and P-wave vector magnitude (Pvm) (square root of the sum of the squared P-wave amplitude in leads II, V6, and one-half of the P-wave amplitude in V2) were measured and divided into 2 groups: patients with high and low Pd/Pvm based on a statistically calculated cut-off value. We evaluated the incidence of late recurrence of atrial fibrillation (LRAF), myocardial injury (high-sensitive troponin I), and the electrophysiologic findings in repeat ablation sessions. This study included 269 patients with PAF. The median follow-up duration was 697 days. The cut-off value of the Pd/Pvm for predicting LRAF was 740.7 ms/mV (area under the curve = 0.81, sensitivity = 58.2%, and specificity = 89.6%). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that high Pd/Pvm (>740.7 ms/mV) was significantly associated with LRAF (p <0.001). The high-sensitive troponin I level was significantly lower, and the ratio of DR-FLASH score >3 was significantly higher in those with high than low Pd/Pvm (p = 0.044 and p = 0.002, respectively). In the repeat ablation sessions, the Pd/Pvm in patients with atrial tachycardia-induced or spontaneously occurring during the repeat CA sessions was significantly higher than in those without (p = 0.009). There was a significant difference between the Pd/Pvm and low-voltage area (p <0.001). In conclusion, the Pd/Pvm is significantly associated with LRAF after cryoballoon ablation in patients with PAF and predicts left atrial low-voltage areas and atrial tachycardia inducibility.

Comparison of voltage maps using OCTARAY catheter and PENTARAY catheter

BACKGROUND

Recently, a new OCTARAY® mapping catheter was commercially launched. The catheter is designed to enable high-density mapping and precise signal recording via 48 small electrodes arranged on eight radiating splines. The purpose of this study was to compare bipolar voltage and low-voltage-area size, and mapping efficacy between the OCTARAY catheter and the PENTARAY® catheter METHODS: Twelve consecutive patients who underwent initial and second ablations for persistent atrial fibrillation within 2 years were considered for enrollment. Voltage mapping was performed twice, first during the initial ablation using the PENTARY catheter and second during the second ablation using the OCTARAY Long 3-3-3-3-3 (L3) catheter.

RESULTS

Mean voltage with the OCTARAY-L3 catheter (1.64 ± 0.57 mV) was 32.3% greater than that with the PENTARAY catheter (1.24 ± 0.46 mV, p < .0001) in total left atrium. Low-voltage-area (<0.50 mV) size with the OCTARAY-L3 catheter was smaller than that with the PENTARAY catheter (6.9 ± 9.7 vs. 11.4 ± 13.0 cm2 , p < .0001). The OCTARAY-L3 catheter demonstrated greater efficacy than the PENTARAY catheter in terms of shorter mapping time (606 ± 99 vs. 782 ± 211 s, p = .008) and more mapping points (3,026 ± 838 vs. 781 ± 342 points, p < .0001).

CONCLUSION

The OCTARAY catheter demonstrated higher voltage recordings, narrower low-voltage areas, and a more efficacious mapping procedure than the PENTARAY catheter.

Clinical Impact of Cryoballoon Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Enlarged Left Atrium

The impact of cryoballoon ablation (CBA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with enlarged left atrium (E-LA) has not been sufficiently clarified. A total of 306 patients underwent an initial CBA for paroxysmal AF between February 2017 and March 2022 in our hospital. These patients were categorized into 2 groups according to the preprocedural left atrium (LA) diameter (LAD): E-LA group with LAD ≥40 mm and normal LA (N-LA) group with LAD <40 mm. We compared late recurrence (LR, defined as a recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia more than 3 months after the ablation) between the 2 groups. In addition, we made a further classification of the E-LA group into a severely E-LA (SE-LA) group with LAD ≥50 mm and mildly enlarged LA (ME-LA) group with LAD <50 mm and compared LR in the SE-LA, ME-LA, and N-LA groups. In the patients who experienced a second ablation procedure owing to LR, subsequent recurrences were also evaluated. After initial CBA, there was no significant difference in recurrence-free survival between E-LA and N-LA groups (p = 0.447). In contrast, the SE-LA group showed the lowest incidence of recurrence-free survival in the SE-LA, ME-LA, and N-LA groups (p = 0.012). However, when we analyzed recurrences after the ablation including second ablation procedure, there were no significant differences in recurrence-free survival among these 3 groups (p = 0.103). In conclusion, patients with paroxysmal AF with enlarged LA showed favorable outcomes compared with those with N-LA after CBA.

Left atrial total emptying fraction measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging predicts low-voltage areas detected during electroanatomical mapping

AIMS

Low-voltage areas (LVAs) found during left atrial (LA) electroanatomical mapping are increasingly targeted by radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) on top of pulmonary vein isolation to improve arrhythmia-free survival in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, pre-procedural prediction of LVAs remains challenging. The purpose of the present study was to describe the association between parameters of LA function and dimensions, respectively, derived from pre-procedural cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, and the presence of LVAs on LA voltage mapping.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients who underwent first-time RFCA for paroxysmal or persistent AF and who were in stable sinus rhythm during pre-procedural CMR imaging were included in this study. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance-derived parameters of LA function and dimensions were calculated. Low-voltage areas were defined as areas with bipolar voltage amplitudes of ≤0.5 mV on electroanatomical mapping. In total, 259 consecutive patients were included in this analysis. Low-voltage areas were found in 25 of 259 patients (9.7%). Compared with those without LVAs, patients with LVAs were significantly older, were more likely to be female, had a higher CHA2DS2-VASc score, had larger LA volumes, and had a lower LA total emptying fraction (TEF). In multivariate analysis, only LA TEF [odds ratio (OR) 0.885, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.846-0.926, P < 0.001] and the CHA2DS2-VASc score (OR 1.507, 95% CI 1.115-2.038, P = 0.008) remained independently associated with the presence of LVAs.

CONCLUSION

Left atrial TEF and the CHA2DS2-VASc score were independently associated with the presence of LVAs found during LA electroanatomical mapping. These findings may help to improve pre-procedural prediction of pro-arrhythmogenic LVAs and to improve peri-procedural patient management.

Research Progress of Low-Voltage Areas Associated with Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrosis is an independent predictor of the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation. Low-voltage areas (LVA) measured during catheter ablation for AF are a commonly used surrogate for the presence of atrial fibrosis. LVA are associated with clinical outcomes and comorbidities and have links to triggering sites for AF. Several trials have shown promising data of targeting ablation in LVA, however the results have been mixed. This article will review the role of LVA in the prediction of adverse events in AF patients, including stroke, how to predict the presence of LVA, and the impact of LVA ablation on the recurrence of AF.

Gender Differences in Atrial Fibrosis and Cardiomyopathy Assessed by Left Atrial Low-Voltage Areas During Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial myocardial degeneration predisposes to atrial fibrillation (AF), ischemic stroke, and heart failure. Studies suggest the presence of gender differences in atrial myocardial degeneration. This study aimed to delineate gender differences in the prevalence, predictors, and prognostic impact of left atrial low-voltage areas (LVAs). This observational study included 1,488 consecutive patients who underwent initial ablation for AF. Voltage mapping was performed after pulmonary vein isolation during sinus rhythm. LVAs were defined as regions where bipolar peak-to-peak voltage was <0.50 mV. LVA prevalence was higher in women (38.7%) than in men (16.0%). High age, persistent form of AF, diabetes mellitus, and a large left atrium were shown to be common predictors in both gender categories. Heart failure and history of stroke/thromboembolic events were men-specific predictors of LVA existence. Women experienced more AF recurrence than men (31.1% vs 25.7%, p = 0.027). LVA existence was significantly associated with increased AF recurrence in each gender category, with a respective hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval, and p value of 2.45, 1.87 to 3.22, and <0.0001 in men and 1.82, 1.33 to 2.49, and <0.0001 in women. In conclusion, LVA was more frequent in women than men, and predicted frequent AF recurrence irrespective of gender category.

Efficacy and safety of low voltage area ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein isolation is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. However, the recurrence rate of AF after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) remains high. The efficacy and safety of low voltage area (LVA) ablation in the treatment of AF are uncertain.

METHODS

The studies comparing the efficacy and safety of LVA ablation and LVA non-ablation for AF were systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed. Outcomes of interest included recurrent event, procedure time, and fluoroscopy time. Continuous variables were evaluated with mean deviation (MD) and standard mean difference (SMD). Odds ratio (OR) values and its 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used in meta-analysis of binary variables.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were eligible for inclusion. The AF recurrence was similar between the two groups, with no statistical difference (25.7% (67/346) vs. 28% (63/225), P = 0.49). LVA ablation did not increase the incidence of AT (8.7% (20/231) vs. 14.5% (28/193), P = 0.66). Fluoroscopy time was longer in the LVA ablation group (31.4 ± 8.4 min vs. 26.3 ± 7.8 min, P < 0.05). Complication rates were similar between the two groups (26.6% (17/64) vs. 21.7% (13/60), P = 0.53). Patients with LVA had higher AT/AF recurrence (32.9% (213/647) vs. 24.2% (229/948), P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with left atrial LVA have a poor prognosis after catheter ablation. LVA ablation did not reduce the recurrence of AF nor did it increase the recurrence of atrial tachycardia.

What determines the optimal pharmacological treatment of atrial fibrillation? Insights from in silico trials in 800 virtual atria

The best pharmacological treatment for each atrial fibrillation (AF) patient is unclear. We aim to exploit AF simulations in 800 virtual atria to identify key patient characteristics that guide the optimal selection of anti-arrhythmic drugs. The virtual cohort considered variability in electrophysiology and low voltage areas (LVA) and was developed and validated against experimental and clinical data from ionic currents to ECG. AF sustained in 494 (62%) atria, with large inward rectifier K+ current (IK1 ) and Na+ /K+ pump (INaK ) densities (IK1 0.11 ± 0.03 vs. 0.07 ± 0.03 S mF-1 ; INaK 0.68 ± 0.15 vs. 0.38 ± 26 S mF-1 ; sustained vs. un-sustained AF). In severely remodelled left atrium, with LVA extensions of more than 40% in the posterior wall, higher IK1 (median density 0.12 ± 0.02 S mF-1 ) was required for AF maintenance, and rotors localized in healthy right atrium. For lower LVA extensions, rotors could also anchor to LVA, in atria presenting short refractoriness (median L-type Ca2+ current, ICaL , density 0.08 ± 0.03 S mF-1 ). This atrial refractoriness, modulated by ICaL and fast Na+ current (INa ), determined pharmacological treatment success for both small and large LVA. Vernakalant was effective in atria presenting long refractoriness (median ICaL density 0.13 ± 0.05 S mF-1 ). For short refractoriness, atria with high INa (median density 8.92 ± 2.59 S mF-1 ) responded more favourably to amiodarone than flecainide, and the opposite was found in atria with low INa (median density 5.33 ± 1.41 S mF-1 ). In silico drug trials in 800 human atria identify inward currents as critical for optimal stratification of AF patient to pharmacological treatment and, together with the left atrial LVA extension, for accurately phenotyping AF dynamics. KEY POINTS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) maintenance is facilitated by small L-type Ca2+ current (ICaL ) and large inward rectifier K+ current (IK1 ) and Na+ /K+ pump. In severely remodelled left atrium, with low voltage areas (LVA) covering more than 40% of the posterior wall, sustained AF requires higher IK1 and rotors localize in healthy right atrium. For lower LVA extensions, rotors can also anchor to LVA, if the atria present short refractoriness (low ICaL ) Vernakalant is effective in atria presenting long refractoriness (high ICaL ). For short refractoriness, atria with fast Na+ current (INa ) up-regulation respond more favourably to amiodarone than flecainide, and the opposite is found in atria with low INa . The inward currents (ICaL and INa ) are critical for optimal stratification of AF patient to pharmacological treatment and, together with the left atrial LVA extension, for accurately phenotyping AF dynamics.

Baseline left atrial low-voltage area predicts recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation: WAVE-MAP AF results

AIMS

Electro-anatomical mapping may be critical to identify atrial fibrillation (AF) subjects who require substrate modification beyond pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The objective was to determine correlations between pre-ablation mapping characteristics and 12-month outcomes after a single PVI-only catheter ablation of AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study enrolled paroxysmal AF (PAF), early persistent AF (PsAF; 7 days-3 months), and non-early PsAF (>3-12 months) subjects undergoing de novo PVI-only radiofrequency catheter ablation. Sinus rhythm (SR) and AF voltage maps were created with the Advisor HD Grid™ Mapping Catheter, Sensor Enabled™ for each subject, and the presence of low-voltage area (LVA) (low-voltage cutoffs: 0.1-1.5 mV) was investigated. Follow-up visits were at 3, 6, and 12 months, with a 24-h Holter monitor at 12 months. A Cox proportional hazards model identified associations between mapping data and 12-month recurrence after a single PVI procedure. The study enrolled 300 subjects (113 PAF, 86 early PsAF, and 101 non-early PsAF) at 18 centres. At 12 months, 75.5% of subjects were free from AF/atrial flutter (AFL)/atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence. Univariate analysis found that arrhythmia recurrence did not correlate with AF diagnosis, but LVA was significantly correlated. Low-voltage area (<0.5 mV) >28% of the left atrium in SR [hazard ratio (HR): 4.82, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.08-11.18; P = 0.0003] and >72% in AF (HR: 5.66, 95% CI: 2.34-13.69; P = 0.0001) was associated with a higher risk of AF/AFL/AT recurrence at 12 months.

CONCLUSION

Larger extension of LVA was associated with an increased risk of arrhythmia recurrence. These subjects may benefit from substrate modification beyond PVI.

Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation With vs Without Additional Low-Voltage-Area Ablation in Older Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

The overall success rate of circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) treatment in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) remains suboptimal, especially in older patients.

Objective

To explore the incremental benefit of low-voltage-area ablation after CPVI in older patients with paroxysmal AF.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This randomized clinical trial was an investigator-initiated trial to compare the efficacy of additional low-voltage-area ablation beyond CPVI vs CPVI alone in older patients with paroxysmal AF. Participants were patients aged 65 to 80 years with paroxysmal AF who were referred for catheter ablation. They were enrolled in 14 tertiary hospitals in China from April 1, 2018, to August 3, 2020, and follow-up occurred through August 15, 2021.

Interventions

Patients were randomized (1:1) to undergo CPVI plus low-voltage-area ablation or CPVI alone. Low-voltage areas were defined as areas with amplitude less than 0.5 mV in more than 3 adjacent points. If low-voltage areas existed, additional substrate ablation was performed in the CPVI plus group but not the CPVI alone group.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point of the study was freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia as documented by electrocardiogram during a clinical visit or lasting longer than 30 seconds during Holter recordings occurring after a single ablation procedure.

Results

Among 438 patients who were randomized (mean [SD] age, 70.5 [4.4] years; 219 men [50%]), 24 (5.5%) did not complete the blanking period and were not included for efficacy analysis. After a median follow-up of 23 months, the recurrence rate of atrial tachyarrhythmia was significantly lower in the CPVI plus group (31/209 patients, 15%) compared with the CPVI alone group (49/205, 24%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38-0.95; P = .03). In subgroup analyses, among all patients with low-voltage area, CPVI plus substrate modification was associated with a 51% decreased risk of ATA recurrence compared with CPVI alone (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.25-0.94; P = .03).

Conclusions and Relevance

This study found that additional low-voltage-area ablation beyond CPVI decreased the ATA recurrence in older patients with paroxysmal AF compared with CPVI alone. Our findings merit further replication by larger trials with longer follow-up.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03462628.

3D Atrial Strain for Predicting Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation after Pulmonary Vein Isolation

AIMS

Association of two-(2D) and three-dimensional (3D) left atrial strain (LAS) and low-voltage area (LVA) with recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was assessed.

METHODS AND RESULTS

3D LAS, 2D LAS, and LVA were obtained in 93 consecutive patients undergoing PVI and recurrence of AF was analyzed prospectively. AF recurred in 12 patients (13%). The 3D left atrial reservoir strain (LARS) and pump strain (LAPS) were lower in patients with recurrent AF than without (p = 0.008 and p = 0.009, respectively). In univariable Cox regression, 3D LARS or LAPS were associated with recurrent AF (LARS: HR = 0.89 (0.81-0.99), p = 0.025; LAPS: HR = 1.40 (1.02-1.92), p = 0.040), while other values were not. Association of 3D LARS or LAPS with recurrent AF was independent of age, body mass index, arterial hypertension, left ventricular ejection fraction, and end-diastolic volume index and left atrial volume index in multivariable models. Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that patients with 3D LAPS < -5.9% did not exhibit recurrent AF, while those >-5.9% had a significant risk of recurrent AF.

CONCLUSIONS

3D LARS and LAPS were associated with recurrent AF after PVI. Association of 3D LAS was independent of relevant clinical and echocardiographic parameters and improved their predictive value. Hence, they may be applied for outcome prediction in patients undergoing PVI.

Recurrences of Atrial Fibrillation Despite Durable Pulmonary Vein Isolation: The PARTY-PVI Study

BACKGROUND

Recurrences of atrial fibrillation (AF) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) are mainly due to pulmonary vein reconnection. However, a growing number of patients have AF recurrences despite durable PVI. The optimal ablative strategy for these patients is unknown. We analyzed the impact of current ablation strategies in a large multicenter study.

METHODS

Patients undergoing a redo ablation for AF and presenting durable PVI were included. The freedom from atrial arrhythmia after pulmonary vein-based, linear-based, electrogram-based, and trigger-based ablation strategies were compared.

RESULTS

Between 2010 and 2020, 367 patients (67% men, 63±10 years, 44% paroxysmal) underwent a redo ablation for AF recurrences despite durable PVI at 39 centers. After durable PVI was confirmed, linear-based ablation was performed in 219 (60%) patients, electrogram-based ablation in 168 (45%) patients, trigger-based ablation in 101 (27%) patients, and pulmonary vein-based ablation in 56 (15%) patients. Seven patients (2%) did not undergo any additional ablation during the redo procedure. After 22±19 months of follow-up, 122 (33%) and 159 (43%) patients had a recurrence of atrial arrhythmia at 12 and 24 months, respectively. No significant difference in arrhythmia-free survival was observed between the different ablation strategies. Left atrial dilatation was the only independent factor associated with arrhythmia-free survival (HR, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.13-2.23]; P=0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with recurrent AF despite durable PVI, no ablation strategy used alone or in combination during the redo procedure appears to be superior in improving arrhythmia-free survival. Left atrial size is a significant predictor of ablation outcome in this population.

Randomized evaluation of redo ablation procedures of atrial fibrillation with focal impulse and rotor modulation-guided procedures: the REDO-FIRM study

AIMS

REDO-FIRM evaluated safety and effectiveness of conventional vs. focal impulse and rotor modulation (FIRM)-guided ablation of recurrent persistent or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) after an initial AF ablation procedure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This prospective, multicentre, randomized study included patients with a single prior AF ablation, but with recurrent AF and reconnected pulmonary veins (PVs). Conventional ablation generally included PV re-isolation; however, additional ablation was permitted per physician discretion. In the FIRM arm, beyond PV re-isolation, basket catheter-based FIRM mapping created dynamic animations of putative rotors, which were targeted for ablation. Between May 2016 and July 2019, 269 subjects were randomized, with 243 subjects completing 12-month follow-up. Ablation beyond re-pulmonary vein isolation, the FIRM vs. Conventional arms did not differ significantly: cavo-tricuspid isthmus -9.0% vs. 15.3%, caval vein isolation -1.5% vs. 0.8%, non-PV trigger -2.2% vs. 3.8%, other -11.9% vs. 13.0%. Single procedure 12-month freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia/atrial flutter-recurrence was 63.3% (76/120) vs. 59.0% (72/122) in the FIRM and Conventional arms (P = 0.3503). Efficacy was similar in the paroxysmal and persistent AF subgroups (P = 0.22 and P = 0.48). The 10-day and 12-month safety endpoints were achieved in 93.3% vs. 93.8% (P = 0.89) and 88.4% vs. 93.4% (P = 0.22) in the FIRM and Conventional arms, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In REDO-FIRM, as compared to standard ablation, FIRM-guided ablation did not provide additional efficacy in redo ablation procedures, but FIRM-guided ablation was equally safe. Additional studies are necessary to identify any potential population able to benefit from FIRM-guided ablation.

Anterior mitral line in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and anterior scar: A multicenter matched comparison-The MiLine study

BACKGROUND

The benefit of an anterior mitral line (AML) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and anterior atrial scar undergoing ablation has never been investigated.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of AML in addition to standard treatment compared to standard treatment alone (no AML) in this subset of patients.

METHODS

Patients with persistent AF and anterior low-voltage zone (LVZ) treated with AML in 3 centers were retrospectively enrolled. The patients were matched in 1:1 fashion with patients having persistent AF and anterior LVZ who underwent conventional ablation in the same centers. Matching parameters were age, LVZ burden, and repeated ablation. Primary endpoint was AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence.

RESULTS

One hundred eight-six patients (age 66 ± 9 years; 34% women) were selected and divided into 2 matched groups. Bidirectional conduction block was achieved in 95% of AML. After median follow-up of 2 years, AF/AT recurrence occurred in 29% of the patients in the AML group vs 48% in the no AML group (log-rank P = .024). On Cox regression multivariate analysis, left atrial volume (hazard ratio [HR] 1.03; P = .006) and AML (HR 0.46; P = .003) were significantly associated with the primary endpoint. On univariate logistic regression, lower body mass index, older age, extensive anterior LVZ, and position of the left atrial activation breakthrough away from the AML were associated with first-pass AML block.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective matched analysis of patients with persistent AF and anterior scar, AML in addition to standard treatment was associated with improved AF/AT-free survival compared to standard treatment alone.

Clinical and Structural Factors Affecting Ablation Outcomes in Atrial Fibrillation Patients - A Review

Catheter ablation is an effective and durable treatment option for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Ablation outcomes vary widely, with optimal results in patients with paroxysmal AF and diminishing results in patients with persistent or long-standing persistent AF. A number of clinical factors including obesity, hypertension, diabetes, obstructive sleep apnea, and alcohol use contribute to AF recurrence following ablation, likely through modulation of the atrial electroanatomic substrate. In this article, we review the clinical risk factors and the electro-anatomic features that contribute to AF recurrence in patients undergoing ablation for AF.

Characterization of Atrial Substrate to Predict the Success of Pulmonary Vein Isolation: The Prospective, Multicenter MASH-AF II (Multipolar Atrial Substrate High Density Mapping in Atrial Fibrillation) Study

Background Left atrial substrate may have mechanistic relevance for ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). We sought to analyze the relationship between low-voltage zones (LVZs), transition zones, and AF recurrence in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation. Methods and Results We conducted a prospective multicenter study on consecutive patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation-only approach. LVZs and transition zones (0.5-1 mV) were analyzed offline on high-density electroanatomical maps collected before pulmonary vein isolation. Overall, 262 patients (61±11 years, 31% female) with paroxysmal (130 pts) or persistent (132 pts) AF were included. After 28 months of follow-up, 73 (28%) patients experienced recurrence. An extension of more than 5% LVZ in paroxysmal AF and more than 15% in persistent AF was associated with recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 4.4 [95% CI, 2.0-9.8], P<0.001 and HR, 1.9 [95% CI, 1.1-3.7], P=0.04, respectively). Significant association was found between LVZs and transition zones and between LVZs and left atrial volume index (LAVI) (both P<0.001). Thirty percent of patients had significantly increased LAVI without LVZs. Eight percent of patients had LVZs despite normal LAVI. Older age, female sex, oncological history, and increased AF recurrence characterized the latter subgroup. Conclusions In patients undergoing first pulmonary vein isolation, the impact of LVZs on outcomes occurs with lower burden in paroxysmal than persistent AF, suggesting that not all LVZs have equal prognostic implications. A proportional area of moderately decreased voltages accompanies LVZs, suggesting a continuous substrate instead of the dichotomous division of healthy or diseased tissue. LAVI generally correlates with LVZs, but a small subgroup of patients may present with disproportionate atrial remodeling, despite normal LAVI.

Efficacy of left atrial low-voltage area-guided catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Aims

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of low-voltage area (LVA)-guided substrate modification catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods

Systematic searches of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were performed from inception to July 2022 for all available studies. The effect estimates were combined with the Mantel–Haenszel random-effects model. Subgroup analyses, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression were conducted to explore the sources of statistical heterogeneity.

Results

A total of 16 studies involving 1942 subjects (mean age: 61 ± 10 years, 69% male) were identified. All studies included patients with paroxysmal AF, non-paroxysmal AF, or both. At a mean follow-up of 18.9 months, patients who underwent LVA-guided substrate modification ablation had significantly higher freedom from all-atrial tachycardia recurrence than patients who underwent control ablation [67.7% vs. 48.9%, risk ratios (RR) 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55–0.76, P &lt; 0.001], with 36% relative risk and 18.7% absolute risk reductions in all-atrial tachycardia recurrence. Subgroup analysis based on AF types demonstrated that the decreased risk of all-atrial tachycardia recurrence was present predominantly in non-paroxysmal AF compared with paroxysmal AF (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.52–0.69 vs. RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.81–1.13).

Conclusion

Low-voltage area-guided substrate modification ablation combined with PVI appears to have a significant beneficial effect of improving freedom from all-atrial tachycardia recurrence, especially in patients with non-paroxysmal AF.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of left atrial substrate modification in atrial fibrillation patients with low voltage areas

Background

The left atrial low-voltage areas (LVAs) are associated with atrial fibrosis; however, it is not clear how the left atrial LVAs affect the recurrence of arrhythmias after catheter ablation, and the efficacy and safety of the left atrial substrate modification based on LVAs as a strategy for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) are not evident for AF patients with LVAs.

Methods

We performed a systematic search to compare the arrhythmia recurrence in AF patients with and without LVAs after conventional ablation and arrhythmia recurrence in LVAs patients after conventional ablation with and without substrate modification based on LVAs.

Result

A total of 6 studies were included, involving 1,175 patients. The arrhythmia recurrence was higher in LVA patients after conventional ablation (OR: 5.14, 95% CI: [3.11, 8.49]; P < 0.00001). Additional LVAs substrate modification could improve the freedom of arrhythmia in LVAs patients after the first procedure (OR: 0.30, 95% CI: [0.15, 0.62]; P = 0.0009). However, there was no significant difference after multiple procedures (P = 0.19). The procedure time (MD: 26.61, 95% CI [15.79, 37.42]; P < 0.00001) and fluoroscopy time (MD: 6.90, 95% CI [4.34, 9.47]; P < 0.00001) in LVAs patients with additional LVAs substrate modification were significantly increased compared to LVAs patients’ without substrate modification. Nevertheless, there were no higher LVAs substrate modification-related complications (P = 0.93) between LVAs patients with and without additional LVAs substrate modification. In the subgroup analysis, the additional LVAs substrate modification reduced the risk of arrhythmia recurrence in LVAs patients during the follow-up time, which was 12 months (OR: 0.32, 95% CI (0.17, 0.58); P = 0.002), and box isolation (OR: 0.37, 95% CI (0.20, 0.69); P = 0.002) subgroups, but the type of AF, follow up >12 months and homogenization subgroups were not statistically significant. Trial sequential analysis shows conclusive evidence for the LVAs ablation.

Conclusion

This study has shown that LVAs could improve the risk of arrhythmia recurrence in AF patients after conventional ablation. And additional LVAs substrate modification after conventional ablation could increase the freedom of arrhythmia recurrence in LVAs patients. Interestingly, the box isolation approach appeared more promising.

Systematic review registration

[http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero], identifier [CRD42021239277].

The Atrium in Atrial Fibrillation - A Clinical Review on How to Manage Atrial Fibrotic Substrates

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia in the population and is associated with a significant clinical and economic burden. Rigorous assessment of the presence and degree of an atrial arrhythmic substrate is essential for determining treatment options, predicting long-term success after catheter ablation, and as a substrate critical in the pathophysiology of atrial thrombogenesis. Catheter ablation of AF has developed into an essential rhythm-control strategy. Nowadays is one of the most common cardiac ablation procedures performed worldwide, with its success inversely related to the extent of atrial structural disease. Although atrial substrate evaluation remains complex, several diagnostic resources allow for a more comprehensive assessment and quantification of the extent of left atrial structural remodeling and the presence of atrial fibrosis. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on the pathophysiology, etiology, and electrophysiological aspects of atrial substrates promoting the development of AF. We also describe the risk factors for its development and how to diagnose its presence using imaging, electrocardiograms, and electroanatomic voltage mapping. Finally, we discuss recent data regarding fibrosis biomarkers that could help diagnose atrial fibrotic substrates.

Effect of MRI-Guided Fibrosis Ablation vs Conventional Catheter Ablation on Atrial Arrhythmia Recurrence in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The DECAAF II Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a challenge. Left atrial fibrosis plays an important role in the pathophysiology of AF and has been associated with poor procedural outcomes.

Objective

To investigate the efficacy and adverse events of targeting atrial fibrosis detected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in reducing atrial arrhythmia recurrence in persistent AF.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The Efficacy of Delayed Enhancement-MRI-Guided Fibrosis Ablation vs Conventional Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation trial was an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized clinical trial involving 44 academic and nonacademic centers in 10 countries. A total of 843 patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic persistent AF and undergoing AF ablation were enrolled from July 2016 to January 2020, with follow-up through February 19, 2021.

Interventions

Patients with persistent AF were randomly assigned to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) plus MRI-guided atrial fibrosis ablation (421 patients) or PVI alone (422 patients). Delayed-enhancement MRI was performed in both groups before the ablation procedure to assess baseline atrial fibrosis and at 3 months postablation to assess for ablation scar.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was time to first atrial arrhythmia recurrence after a 90-day blanking period postablation. The primary safety composite outcome was defined by the occurrence of 1 or more of the following events within 30 days postablation: stroke, PV stenosis, bleeding, heart failure, or death.

Results

Among 843 patients who were randomized (mean age 62.7 years; 178 [21.1%] women), 815 (96.9%) completed the 90-day blanking period and contributed to the efficacy analyses. There was no significant difference in atrial arrhythmia recurrence between groups (fibrosis-guided ablation plus PVI patients, 175 [43.0%] vs PVI-only patients, 188 [46.1%]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.77-1.17]; P = .63). Patients in the fibrosis-guided ablation plus PVI group experienced a higher rate of safety outcomes (9 [2.2%] vs 0 in PVI group; P = .001). Six patients (1.5%) in the fibrosis-guided ablation plus PVI group had an ischemic stroke compared with none in PVI-only group. Two deaths occurred in the fibrosis-guided ablation plus PVI group, and the first one was possibly related to the procedure.

Conclusions and Relevance

Among patients with persistent AF, MRI-guided fibrosis ablation plus PVI, compared with PVI catheter ablation only, resulted in no significant difference in atrial arrhythmia recurrence. Findings do not support the use of MRI-guided fibrosis ablation for the treatment of persistent AF.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02529319.

Low-voltage area substrate modification for atrial fibrillation ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials

AIMS

The value of additional ablation beyond pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is unclear, especially for persistent AF. The optimal target for substrate modification to improve outcomes is uncertain. We investigate the utility of low-voltage area (LVA) substrate modification in patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF.

METHODS

This meta-analysis was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Medline, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Only randomized studies were included. AF patients who underwent catheter ablation with voltage-guided substrate modification targeting LVA (LVA group) vs. conventional ablation approaches not targeting LVA (non-LVA group) were compared.

RESULTS

Four studies comprising 539 patients were included (36% female). Freedom from arrhythmia (FFA) in patients with persistent AF was greater in the LVA group [risk ratio (RR) 1.30; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.64]. There was no difference in FFA in patients with paroxysmal AF between groups (RR 1.30; 95% CI 0.89-1.91). There was no difference in total procedural time (mean difference -17.54 min; 95% CI -64.37 to 29.28 min) or total ablation time (mean difference -36.17 min; 95% CI -93.69 to 21.35 min) in all included patients regardless of AF type between groups. There was no difference in periprocedural complications between groups in all included patients regardless of AF type (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.22-3.82).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrates improved FFA in persistent AF patients who underwent voltage-guided substrate modification targeting LVA.

What we have learned: is pulmonary vein isolation still the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation ablation?

Ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is an established treatment option for symptomatic patients. The cornerstone of all ablation strategies is electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins (PVs). Ablation strategies going beyond PV isolation (PVI) might be considered in the setting of recurrent AF despite durably isolated PVs. The lack of persistent PVI, however, limits the opportunities to perceive the real impact of this endpoint on AF suppression and to fully understand the benefit of extended ablation strategies going beyond. To overcome this limitation, novel and innovative ablation systems have been developed to facilitate acute PVI and to increase its durability. These systems include balloon-based ablation devices incorporating different energy sources such as cryo energy, laser, or radiofrequency current, but also new energy sources such as pulsed field ablation as a non-thermal energy source. These technologies could advance catheter ablation of AF to an early stage of the disease and to the primary treatment tool. The current manuscript focuses on the past, the present, and the future value of PVI as the cornerstone for interventional treatment of AF and on how to achieve durable PVI during the first procedure and to further improve the clinical success rates of AF ablation. It also analyses extended ablation strategies going beyond PVI and their impact.

Pulmonary vein isolation alone versus pulmonary vein isolation with additional extensive ablation for paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation

Background

The value of additional ablation beyond pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is unclear, especially for persistent AF. It is uncertain whether substrate modification with additional extensive ablation improves outcomes. We reviewed our experience to determine whether pulmonary vein isolation with additional extensive ablation (PVIEA) improves outcomes compared to pulmonary vein isolation alone (PVIA) for AF ablation.

Methods

Consecutive cases of patients with PVIA versus PVIEA were compared between September 9, 2013 and December 12, 2020. Procedural data collected include radiofrequency ablation delivery time (RADT) and arrhythmia inducibility. Clinical data collected include sinus rhythm maintenance post‐procedure.

Results

A total of 235 patients were studied (67 PVIA and 168 PVIEA). RADT was shorter when comparing ablation with PVIA versus PVIEA (32 vs. 40 min; p = .04). More arrhythmias were inducible with PVIEA (p < .01). There was no difference in sinus rhythm maintenance by Kaplan–Meier survival analysis (log‐rank test p = .75), after 3 or 12 months between groups overall, and when stratified by AF type (paroxysmal and persistent), left atrial volume, CHA₂DS₂‐VASc score, left ventricular ejection fraction, or catheter ablation setting (high‐power short‐duration, standard‐power standard‐duration, temperature‐controlled non‐contact‐force).

Conclusion

AF ablation with PVIA or PVIEA produces similar sinus rhythm maintenance overall and when stratified by catheter setting and AF type. PVIA reduced procedure times and less arrhythmias were inducible post‐ablation.

Pre-procedural predictors of left atrial low-voltage zones in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

Pulmonary vein isolation has become a cornerstone treatment for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Recent reports show that additional ablation targeting low-voltage zones reduces AF recurrence. However, the pre-procedural predictors of low-voltage zones remain elusive. We retrospectively enrolled 359 patients (mean age 63.7 ± 10.8 years; 73 females; and 149 had persistent atrial fibrillation) who underwent catheter ablation for AF and left atrial (LA) voltage mapping during sinus rhythm or atrial pacing. Low-voltage zones were defined as area of > 5 cm2 with a bipolar electrogram amplitude of < 0.50 mV. Overall, 51 (14.2%) patients had low-voltage zones. Patients with low-voltage zones were older (67.9 ± 9.9 vs. 63.0 ± 10.8 years; P = 0.003), predominantly female (33.3% vs. 18.2%; P = 0.013), had higher prevalence of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) (11.8% vs. 1.6%; P = 0.002) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) (9.8% vs. 2.6%; P = 0.025), and had larger LA volumes (153.6 ± 46.4 vs. 117.7 ± 67.8 mL; P < 0.001) than those without low-voltage zones. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age (OR 1.060; 95% CI 1.022–1.101, P = 0.002), female sex (OR 2.978; 95% CI 1.340–6.615, P = 0.007), DCM (OR 8.341; 95% CI 1.381–50.372, P = 0.021), HCM (OR 5.044; 95% CI 1.314–19.363, P = 0.018), persistent AF (OR 4.188; 95% CI 1.928–9.100, P < 0.001), and larger LA volume (OR 3.215; 95% CI 1.378–7.502, P = 0.007) were independently associated with the presence of low-voltage zones. Patient age, female sex, DCM, HCM, persistent AF and larger LA volume may predict the presence of low-voltage zones and could be useful in selecting the appropriate ablation strategy for AF.

Bi‐atrial characterization of the electrical substrate in patients with atrial fibrillation

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Influence of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation on atrial and ventricular functional mitral regurgitation

Aims

The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of catheter ablation on cardiac structural reverse remodelling and atrial (AFMR) and ventricular (VFMR) functional mitral regurgitation (MR), and the long‐term prognosis of patients with AFMR and VFMR.

Methods and results

The retrospective study included persistent AF patients who had AFMR (n = 136, left atrial (LA) volume index >30 mL/m² and left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction ≥40%) or VFMR (n = 31, LV ejection fraction <40% or LV regional asynergy) and had undergone the initial AF ablation from April 2015 to December 2019. Baseline and 6 month follow‐up echocardiography were performed to assess MR, LA, and LV sizes. MR improvement after ablation was comparable in the AFMR (64%) and VFMR groups (52%, P = 0.20). Patients with AFMR improvement showed a greater decrease in left atrial volume after ablation than those without (amount of change: −11.4 ± 15.1 vs. −2.3 ± 21.1 mL/m², P = 0.01). Patients with VFMR improvement showed a greater increase in LV ejection fraction than those without (amount of change: 28.5 ± 13.6% vs. 9.0 ± 14.8%, P = 0.001). The composite endpoint of all‐cause death and heart failure hospitalization during the 2 year follow‐up period was more frequently observed in the VFMR than in the AFMR group (22.6% vs. 3.7%, P < 0.0001). Patients with MR improvement after catheter ablation less frequently demonstrated the composite endpoint than those without (1.9% vs. 15.6%, P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Atrial functional mitral regurgitation and VFMR improvement after ablation were associated with atrial and ventricular reverse remodelling, respectively. It is possible that long‐term prognosis is better in patients with AFMR than with VFMR, and in those with MR improvement than in those without.

Atrial Structural Remodeling in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Is a Diffuse Fibrotic Process: Evidence From High-Density Voltage Mapping and Atrial Biopsy

Background

Low‐voltage areas (LVAs) in the atria of patients with atrial fibrillation are considered local fibrosis. We hypothesized that voltage reduction in the atria is a diffuse process associated with fibrosis and that the presence of LVAs reflects a global voltage reduction.

Methods and Results

We examined 140 patients with atrial fibrillation and 13 patients with a left accessory pathway (controls). High‐density bipolar voltage mapping was performed using a grid‐mapping catheter during high right atrial pacing. Global left atrial (LA) voltage (V_GLA) in the whole LA and regional LA voltage (V_RLA) in 6 anatomic regions were evaluated with the mean of the highest voltage at a sampling density of 1 cm². Patients with atrial fibrillation were categorized into quartiles by V_GLA. LVAs were evaluated at voltage cutoffs of 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mV. Twenty‐eight patients with atrial fibrillation also underwent right atrial septum biopsy, and the fibrosis extent was quantified. Voltage at the biopsy site (V_biopsy) was recorded. V_GLA results by category were Q1 (<4.2 mV), Q2 (4.2–5.6 mV), Q3 (5.7–7.0 mV), and Q4 (≥7.1 mV). V_RLA at any region was reduced as V_GLA decreased. V_GLA and V_RLA did not differ between Q4 and controls. The presence of LVAs increased as V_GLA decreased at any voltage cutoff. Biopsies revealed 11±6% fibrosis, which was inversely correlated with both V_biopsy and V_GLA (r=–0.71 and –0.72, respectively). V_biopsy was correlated with V_GLA (r=0.82).

Conclusions

Voltage reduction in the LA is a diffuse process associated with fibrosis. Presence of LVAs reflects diffuse voltage reduction of the LA.

Strategies for Repeat Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Multicentre Comparison of Non-Pulmonary Vein versus Pulmonary Vein Target Ablation

Introduction

Approximately 18% of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergo a repeat ablation within 12 months after their index ablation. Despite the high prevalence, comparative studies on nonpulmonary vein (PV) target strategies in repeat AF ablation are scarce. Here, we describe 12 months efficacy of non‐PV and PV target ablations as a repeat ablation strategy.

Methods

A multicentre retrospective, descriptive study was conducted with data of 280 patients who underwent repeat AF ablation. The ablation strategy for repeat ablation was at the operators' discretion. Non‐PV target ablation (n = 140) included PV reisolation, posterior wall isolation, mitral line, roofline, and/or complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation. PV target ablation (n = 140), included reisolation and/or wide atrium circumferential ablation. Patients' demographics and rhythm outcomes during 12 months follow‐up were analyzed.

Results

At 12 months, more atrial tachyarrhythmias were observed in the non‐PV target group (48.6%) compared to the PV target group (29.3%, p = .001). Similarly, a significantly higher AF and atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence rate was observed after non‐PV target ablation compared to PV target ablation (36.4% vs. 22.1% and 22.9% vs. 10.7%). After adjustment, a significantly higher risk of AT recurrence remained in the non‐PV target group. Both groups significantly de‐escalated antiarrhythmic drug use; de‐escalation was more profound after PV target ablation. Patients with isolated PVs during non‐PV target ablation had a significantly higher risk for AF recurrence than those with reconnected PVs.

Conclusion

Compared to PV target ablation, non‐PV target repeat ablation did not improve outcomes after 12 months and was independently associated with an increased risk for AT recurrences.

Rhythm Monitoring Strategy and Arrhythmia Recurrence in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Trials: A Systematic Review

Background

: The rhythm-monitoring strategy after catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) impacts the detection of atrial arrhythmia recurrence and is not well characterized. We performed a systematic review and meta-regression analysis to determine whether the duration and mode of rhythm monitoring after CA affects detection of atrial arrhythmia recurrence.

Methods

Databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials of adult patients undergoing first CA for AF from 2007 to 2021. Duration and strategy of rhythm monitoring were extracted. Meta-regression was used to identify any association between duration of monitoring and detection of atrial arrhythmia recurrence. The primary measure of outcome was single-procedure recurrence of atrial arrhythmia.

Results

The search strategy yielded 57 trial arms from 56 randomized controlled trials comprising 5322 patients: 36 arms of patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF), and 21 arms of patients with persistent AF (PeAF) or both PAF/PeAF. Intermittent monitoring was associated with detection of significantly less atrial arrhythmia recurrence than continuous monitoring in PAF arms (31.2% vs 46.9%, P = 0.001), but not in PeAF/PAF-PeAF combined arms (43.3% vs 63.6%, P = 0.12). No significant relationship was seen between the duration of intermittent rhythm monitoring and atrial arrhythmia recurrence detection in either the PAF (P = 0.93) or PeAF/PAF-PeAF combined arms (P = 0.20).

Conclusions

Continuous rhythm monitoring detected higher atrial arrhythmia recurrence rates, compared to intermittent rhythm monitoring, in patients with PAF. The duration of intermittent monitoring did not show a statistically significant relationship to the yield of arrhythmia detection, in near identical cohorts of trial subjects undergoing similar interventions, with clinical and research implications.

Comparison of the empirical linear ablation and low voltage area-guided ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: a propensity score-matched analysis

Background

The efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone is not guaranteed for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF), and it is unclear which type of ablation approach should be applied in addition to PVI. This study aimed to compare outcomes and prognosis between empirical linear ablation and low-voltage area (LVA) ablation after PVI for PeAF.

Methods

We enrolled 128 patients with PeAF who were assigned to the linear ablation group (n = 64) and the LVA ablation group (n = 64) using a propensity score-matched model. After PVI and cardioversion, the patients underwent either empirical linear ablation or LVA ablation during sinus rhythm. All patients in the linear ablation group underwent both roof line and mitral valve isthmus (MVI) ablations. An electrical-guided ablation targeting LVA (< 0.5 mV) was performed in the LVA group. When there was no LVA in the LVA group, only PVI was applied. We compared the procedural outcomes and recurrence after ablation between the two groups.

Results

The baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups. Fifty patients had LVA (22 and 28 patients in the linear and LVA groups). The roof and MVI lines were completed in 100% and 96.9% of the patients. During the mean follow-up of 279.5 ± 161.3 days, the LVA group had significantly lower recurrence than the linear group (15 patients [23%] vs. 29 patients [45%], p = 0.014). Thirty-five patients were prescribed antiarrhythmic drugs during the follow-up period (linear group, n = 17; LVA group, n = 18); amiodarone and bepridil were administered to most of the patients (15 and 17 patients, respectively). The difference in the prognosis was relevant among the patients with LVA, while this trend was not observed in those without LVA. The LVA ablation group demonstrated significantly lower radiofrequency energy and shorter procedural time compared to the linear ablation group. The recurrence of atrial flutter was more likely to occur in the linear group than in the LVA group (14 [22%] vs. 6 [9.4%], p = 0.052).

Conclusion

The electrophysiological-guided LVA ablation is more effective than empirical linear ablation in PeAF patients with LVA. Unnecessary empirical linear ablation might have a risk of iatrogenic gap and atrial flutter recurrence.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-022-02460-9.

Low voltage zones detected by omnipolar Vmax map accurately identifies the potential atrial substrate and predicts the AF ablation outcome after PV isolation

INTRODUCTION

The presence of bipolar low-voltage zone (LVZ) is a predictor of AF recurrence after PV isolation (PVI). However, changes of wavefront and bipole directions may cause different electrogram characteristics. We aimed to investigate whether using omnipolar maximum voltage (Vmax) map derived from high density (HD) Grid mapping catheter could assess LVZ and AF ablation outcome accurately.

METHODS

Fifty paroxysmal AF patients (27 males, 57.8 ± 9.5 years old) who underwent 3D mapping guided PVI were enrolled. Left atrial voltage mapping during sinus rhythm before ablation was performed. The significant LVZ (<0.5 mV with area > 5 cm²) were defined as sites by omnipolar Vmax, bipolar HD wave map, conventional bipolar electrograms acquired from electrode pairs along to and across to the catheter shaft. The primary end point was the first documented recurrence of any AF during follow-ups.

RESULTS

PVI was performed in all patients, and there were 2 patients (4%) who also received additional non-PV triggers ablation. After a follow-up of 11.4 ± 5.4 months, recurrence of AF occurred in 12 patients (24%). The presence of a significant LVZ was less detected by omnipolar Vmax map, compared to HD wave map (24.0% vs. 58.0%, p = 0.001). LVZ detected by omnipolar Vmax map independently predicted the AF recurrence (odds ratio 16.91; 95% CI, 3.17-90.10; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

LVZ detected by omnipolar Vmax map accurately predicts the AF recurrence following ablation in paroxysmal AF, compared to conventional bipolar and HD wave maps, suggesting the omnipolar Vmax map can precisely define the atrial substrate property.

Outcomes of posterior wall isolation with pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Prior studies have shown that addition of posterior wall isolation (PWI) may reduce atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. No data on PWI in paroxysmal AF (pAF) patients with normal left atrial voltage is available, to date.

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to evaluate the efficacy of PWI in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients presenting with pAF and normal left atrial voltage.

METHODS

Consecutive patient registry analysis was performed on all patients with pAF and normal left atrial voltage undergoing initial radiofrequency ablation from November 1, 2018 to November 15, 2019. Primary endpoint was recurrence of atrial arrhythmia including AF, atrial tachycardia (AT), or atrial flutter (AFL).

RESULTS

A total of 321 patients were studied, 214 in the PVI group and 107 in the PWI + PVI group. Recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia occurred in 18.2% of patients in the PVI group and 16.8% in the PVI + PWI cohort (p = 0.58). At 1 year, recurrence was 14.0% in the PVI group and 15.0% in the PWI + PVI group (p = 0.96). There was a lower AT/AFL recurrence in the PVI + PWI group, not reaching significance (3.7% in the PWI + PVI group vs. 7.9% in PVI group, p = 0.31). Need for carina lesions predicted recurrence in the PVI-only group.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of PWI to PVI in pAF patients undergoing their first ablation did not reduce the frequency of atrial arrhythmia recurrence. This warrants further study in a prospective trial.

Clinical Outcomes of low-voltage area-guided left atrial linear ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients

Background

The therapeutic effect of low-voltage area (LVA)-guided left atrial (LA) linear ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (non-PAF) is uncertain. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of LA linear ablation based on the preexisting LVA and its effects on LA reverse remodeling in non-PAF patients.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 145 consecutive patients who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation for drug-refractory non-PAF. CARTO-guided bipolar voltage mapping was performed in atrial fibrillation (AF). LVA was defined as sites with voltage ≤ 0.5 mV. If circumferential pulmonary vein isolation couldn’t convert AF into sinus rhythm, additional LA linear ablation was performed preferentially at sites within LVA.

Results

After a mean follow-up duration of 48 ± 33 months, 29 of 145 patients had drugs-refractory AF/LA tachycardia recurrence. Low LA emptying fraction, large LA size and high extent of LVA were associated with AF recurrence. There were 136 patients undergoing LA linear ablation. The rate of linear block at the mitral isthmus was significantly higher via LVA-guided than non-LVA-guided linear ablation. Patients undergoing LVA-guided linear ablation had larger LA size and higher extent of LVA, but the long-term AF/LA tachycardia-free survival rate was higher than the non-LVA-guided group. The LA reverse remodeling effects by resuming sinus rhythm were noted even in patients with a diseased left atrium undergoing extensive LA linear ablation.

Conclusions

LVA-guided linear ablation through targeting the arrhythmogenic LVA and reducing LA mass provides a better clinical outcome than non-LVA guided linear ablation, and outweighs the harmful effects of iatrogenic scaring in non-PAF patients.