Endovascular Thrombectomy Versus Bridging Thrombolysis: Real-World Efficacy and Safety Analysis Based on a Nationwide Registry Study

Real-world setting comparison of bridging therapy versus direct mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Intravenous Thrombolysis (IVT) prior to Mechanical Thrombectomy (MT) for Acute Ischaemic Stroke (AIS) due to Large-Vessel Occlusion (LVO) remains controversial. Therefore, the authors performed a meta-analysis of the available real-world evidence focusing on the efficacy and safety of Bridging Therapy (BT) compared with direct MT in patients with AIS due to LVO.

METHODS

Four databases were searched until 01 February 2023. Retrospective and prospective studies from nationwide or health organization registry databases that compared the clinical outcomes of BT and direct MT were included. Odds Ratios (ORs) and 95 % Confidence Intervals (CIs) for efficacy and safety outcomes were pooled using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Of the 12 studies, 86,695 patients were included. In patients with AIS due to LVO, BT group was associated with higher odds of achieving excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-1) at 90 days (OR = 1.48, 95 % CI 1.25-1.75), favorable discharge disposition (to the home with or without services) (OR = 1.33, 95 % CI 1.29-1.38), and decreased mortality at 90 days (OR = 0.62, 95 % CI 0.56-0.70), as compared with the direct MT group. In addition, the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage did not increase significantly in the BT group.

CONCLUSION

The present meta-analysis indicates that BT was associated with favorable outcomes in patients with AIS due to LVO. These findings support the current practice in a real-world setting and strengthen their validity. For patients eligible for both IVT and MT, BT remains the standard treatment until more data are available.

Meta-analysis of direct endovascular thrombectomy vs bridging therapy in the management of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion

BACKGROUND

Debates persist when using intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large-vessel occlusion (LVO). This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized evidence on outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO), comparing bridging therapy (BT) with MT alone.

METHOD

We conducted searches of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to July 2023 to identify pertinent clinical trials and observational studies.

RESULT

76 studies, involving 37,658 patients, revealed no significant difference in 90-day functional independence between DEVT and BT. However, a trend favoring BT for achieving functional independence with a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0-1 was observed, having Odds ratio (OR) of 0.75 (95% CI 0.66-0.86; p < 0.001). DEVT was associated with higher postprocedural mortality (OR 1.44;95% CI 1.25-1.65; p < 0.001), but a lower risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage compared to BT (OR 0.855; 95% CI 0.621-1.177; p = 0.327). Successful recanalization rates favored BT, emphasizing the importance of individualized treatment decisions (OR 0.759; 95% CI 0.594-0.969; p = 0.027). Sensitivity analyses were conducted to identify key contributors to heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis underscores the intricate equilibrium between functional efficacy and safety in the evaluation of DEVT and BT for ACS-LVO. Fundamentally, while BT appears more efficacious, concerns about safety arise due to the superior safety profile demonstrated by DEVT. Individualized treatment decisions are imperative, and further trials are warranted to enhance precision in clinical guidance.

Intravenous Thrombolysis or Medical Management for Minor Strokes

OBJECTIVE

 To evaluate the outcomes of acute ischemic stroke patients with minor deficits treated with either intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) or routine medical management (MM).

METHODS

 The study included patients with acute ischemic stroke and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores of 5 or less who were treated with IVT within 4.5 hours from symptom onset and were classified as the IVT group. The MM group consisted of an equal number of patients with minor strokes, matched for sex, age, and severity, who did not receive thrombolysis. Data on patient information were collected for both groups.

RESULTS

 A total of 26,236 patients were included in this study (13,208 in IVT and 13,208 in MM). Of these patients, 67.9% were men, and the mean age was 67.1 years (standard deviation: 10.9). At 3 months, the IVT group had a higher rate of stroke-independent outcome (Rankin Scale score of 0-2) compared with the MM group (IVT vs. MM: 91.6 vs. 88.6%, absolute difference: 2.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6-3.4%, p = 0.008; adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1-1.4, p = 0.003). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in 3-month mortality rates between the IVT and MM groups (IVT vs. MM: 2.1 vs. 2.5%, absolute difference: -0.6%, 95% CI: -1.1 to 0.3%, p = 0.11; adjusted HR: 0.9, 95% CI: 0.8-1.2, p = 0.09).

CONCLUSION

 Compared with MM, IVT does not reduce mortality in minor ischemic stroke but improves functional outcomes in minor stroke with an NIHSS score of 3 to 5.

Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy vs. Bridging Therapy in Stroke Patients in A “Stroke Belt” Region of Southern Europe

The aim of this 4-year observational study is to analyze the outcomes of stroke patients treated with direct mechanical thrombectomy (dMT) compared to bridging therapy (BT) (intravenous thrombolysis [IVT] + BT) based on 3-month outcomes, in real clinical practice in the "Stroke Belt" of Southern Europe. In total, 300 patients were included (41.3% dMT and 58.6% BT). The frequency of direct referral to the stroke center was similar in the dMT and BT group, whereas the time from onset to groin was longer in the BT group (median 210 [IQR 160–303] vs. 399 [IQR 225–675], p = 0.001). Successful recanalization (TICI 2b-3) and hemorrhagic transformation were similar in both groups. The BT group more frequently showed excellent outcomes at 3 months (32.4% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.004). Multivariate analysis showed that BT was independently associated with excellent outcomes (OR 2.7. 95% CI,1.2–5.9, p = 0.02) and lower mortality (OR 0.36. 95% CI 0.16–0.82, p = 015). Conclusions: Compared with dMT, BT was associated with excellent functional outcomes and lower 3-month mortality in this real-world clinical practice study conducted in a region belonging to the “Stroke Belt” of Southern Europe. Given the disparity of results on the benefit of BT in the current evidence, it is of vital importance to analyze the convenience of its use in each health area.

Endovascular thrombectomy or bridging therapy in minor ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion

BACKGROUND

Whether direct endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is non-inferior to bridging therapy (intravenous thrombolysis [IVT] followed by EVT) in minor acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusions (AIS-LVO) is not clear. Therefore, this study aimed to assess whether direct EVT is non-inferior to bridging therapy in minor AIS-LVO.

METHODS

903 patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score <6 receiving EVT treatment were enrolled at Bigdata Observatory Platform for Stroke of China in China from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020, with final follow-up on March 31, 2021. The primary efficacy endpoint was a favorable outcome defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 at three months. In addition, there were three prespecified secondary efficacy endpoints, including symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), in-hospital mortality, and mortality by month 3.

RESULTS

A total of 662 patients treated with direct EVT (age 65.9 ± 10.5 years, 71.5 % male, NIHSS score 2.4 [standard deviation {SD}. 1.8]) were compared to 241 bridging-treated patients (age 65.7 ± 10.8, 75.9 % female, NIHSS score 2.5 [1.8]). The rate of symptomatic ICH in the EVT group was lower than in the bridging group (4.2 % vs. 8.3 %; P = 0.02). The in-hospital mortality was not different between the two groups (EVT vs. bridging group: adjusted hazard ratio {HR}, 0.9 [95 % confidence interval {CI}, 0.5 to 1.9]; P = 0.93). There was no significant difference in 3-month poor functional outcome rate (EVT vs. bridging group: 17.1 % vs. 16.2 % [absolute difference, 0.9 % {95 % CI, -0.8 % to 2.4 %}, P = 0.75; adjusted hazard ratio {HR}, 1.0 {95 % CI, 0.6 to 1.7}, P = 0.83]) and mortality rate (13.0 % vs. 11.2 % [absolute difference, 1.5 % {95 % CI, -3.9 % to 6.8 %}, P = 0.47; adjusted HR, 1.1 {95 % CI, 0.8 to 1.9}, P = 0.55]) between those two groups.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with minor AIS-LVO, direct EVT, compared with bridging therapy, met the prespecified statistical threshold for noninferiority for the 3-month prognosis.

Prediction modelling the impact of onset to treatment time on the modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days for patients with acute ischaemic stroke

Introduction

Shortening the time from stroke onset to treatment increases the effectiveness of endovascular stroke therapies.

Aim

This study aimed to predict the modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days post-stroke (mRS-90d score) in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) with respect to four types of treatment: conservative therapy (CVT), intravenous thrombolysis only (IVT), mechanical thrombectomy only (MT) and pretreatment with IVT before MT (IVT+MT).

Patients and methods

This nationwide observational study included 124 484 confirmed cases of acute stroke in Sweden over 6 years (2012–2017). The associations between onset-to-treatment time (OTT), patient age and hospital admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score with the five-levelled mRS-90d score were retrospectively studied. A generalised linear model (GLM) was fitted to predict the mRS-90d scores for each patient group.

Results

The fitted GLM for CVT patients is a function of age and NIHSS score. For IVT, MT and IVT+MT patients, GLMs additionally employed OTT variables. By reducing the mean OTTs by 15 min, the number needed-to-treat (NNT) for one patient to make a favourable one-step shift in the mRS was 30 for IVT, 48 for MT and 21 for IVT+MT.

Discussion and conclusion

This study demonstrates linear associations of mRS-90d score with OTT for IVT, MT and IVT+MT, and shows in absolute effects measures that OTT reductions for IVT and/or MT produces substantial health gains for patients with AIS. Even moderate OTT reductions led to sharp drops in the NNT.

Endovascular Thrombectomy Versus Bridging Thrombolysis: Real-World Efficacy and Safety Analysis Based on a Nationwide Registry Study

Background

It was uncertain if direct endovascular thrombectomy (ET) was superior to bridging thrombolysis (BT) for patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by large‐vessel occlusions. We aimed to examine real‐world clinical outcomes of ET using nationwide registry data in China and to compare the efficacy and safety between BT and direct ET.

Methods and Results

Patients treated with ET from a nationwide registry study in China were included. Rapid neurological improvement, intracranial hemorrhage, and in‐hospital mortality were compared between the 2 groups using multivariate logistic models and propensity‐score matching analyses. A total of 7674 patients from 592 stroke centers were included. The median onset‐to‐puncture time, onset‐to‐door time, and door to puncture time were 290, 170, and 99 minutes, respectively. A total of 2069 (27.0%) patients received BT treatment. Patients in the BT group had a significantly shorter onset‐to‐puncture time (235 versus 323 minutes; P<0.001) and onset‐to‐door time (90 versus 222 minutes; P<0.001) compared with the direct ET group. The prior use of intravenous thrombolysis was associated with a higher rate of rapid neurological improvement (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71–0.96) and higher risk of intracranial hemorrhage (adjusted OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.18–1.80) in multivariate analyses and propensity‐score matching analyses.

Conclusions

This study reflects the current application of ET in China. More patients received direct ET than BT. Our results suggested that favorable short‐term outcomes could be achieved with BT compared with direct ET. Higher risk of intracranial hemorrhage was observed in the BT group.