1
|
Zhang M, Peng W, Yin S, Zhao Y, Lin Y. Nondual Antiplatelet Therapy Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2024; 83:297-305. [PMID: 38030135 DOI: 10.1097/fjc.0000000000001512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an interventional procedure performed in patients with severe aortic stenosis and often required perioperative antiplatelet therapy. Most previous studies have focused on antiplatelet therapy following TAVR. However, few studies have investigated the prognostic effect of preoperative antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing TAVR. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of nondual antiplatelet therapy (non-DAPT) and DAPT before TAVR. We performed a systematic search of Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science until February 2023. Studies were eligible if they compared non-DAPT (single antiplatelet therapy or no antiplatelet therapy) with DAPT in patients before TAVR. A total of 5 studies, including 2329 patients, met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Preoperative non-DAPT significantly decreased minor bleeding events compared with preoperative DAPT [odds ratio 0.58; 95% confidence interval: 0.44-0.76]. There were no significant differences in the incidence of other bleeding events, transfusions, stroke, myocardial infarction, or all-cause death. Preoperative single antiplatelet therapy significantly decreased the incidence of major bleeding compared with DAPT (odds ratio 0.14; 95% confidence interval: 0.04-0.48). Preoperative non-DAPT significantly reduced minor bleeding events in patients undergoing TAVR, without increasing the risk of stroke and myocardial infarction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengdi Zhang
- Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; and
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Wenxing Peng
- Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; and
| | - Shiqi Yin
- Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; and
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yiru Zhao
- Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; and
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yang Lin
- Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; and
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moey MYY, Udani K, Nifong LW, Carabello BA, Morris DL, Shah NN. Optimal antiplatelet and antithrombotic regimen post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Eur J Clin Invest 2023; 53:e14071. [PMID: 37539630 DOI: 10.1111/eci.14071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are limited data regarding optimal antiplatelet/antithrombotic therapy following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). METHODS In this single-centre retrospective study including TAVR patients from 2012 to 2020, ischemic and bleeding outcomes were compared between antiplatelet (dual antiplatelet [DAPT] vs. single antiplatelet [SAPT]) and oral anticoagulation (OAC) groups using incidence rate, Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS Total 492 patients (mean age 79.7 ± 7.7 years, 53.7% males, 83.5% Caucasian) were included. There was higher incidence of 1-year death or ischemia with DAPT vs. SAPT (23.6 vs. 14.8 per 100 patient-years [PY], incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97-2.68, p = .05), especially in those without coronary artery disease (23.9 vs. 10.7 per 100 PY, IRR 2.24, 95% CI 1.10-4.47, p = .017). There was significantly higher major bleeding in those on OAC vs. no OAC (15 vs. 8 per 100 PY, IRR 1.87, 95% CI 1.10-3.11, p = .016), especially late (>1-year) bleeding (10.2 vs. 3.6 per 100 PY, IRR 2.81, 95% CI 1.33-5.92, p = .004). In multivariate analysis, DAPT was an independent predictor of death or ischemia (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.41, 95% CI 1.01-1.96, p = .041). OAC was an independent predictor of major bleeding (aHR 2.32, 95% CI 1.31-4.13, p = .004). CONCLUSIONS There is signal to harm with routine use of DAPT post-TAVR. There is higher incidence of late bleeding post-TAVR with OAC, suggesting potential role for alternate antithrombotic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Y Y Moey
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, East Carolina University (ECU), Greenville, North Carolina, USA
- St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kunjan Udani
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, East Carolina University (ECU), Greenville, North Carolina, USA
| | - L Wiley Nifong
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - D Lynn Morris
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, East Carolina University (ECU), Greenville, North Carolina, USA
| | - Neeraj N Shah
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, East Carolina University (ECU), Greenville, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dobesh PP, Goldsweig AM. Antithrombotic therapy with Transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Pharmacotherapy 2023; 43:1064-1083. [PMID: 37464970 DOI: 10.1002/phar.2847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
Aortic valve replacement is a necessary management strategy for patients with severe aortic stenosis. The use of transaortic valve replacement (TAVR) has increased significantly over the last decade and now exceeds traditional surgical aortic valve replacement. Since the valve systems used in TAVR consist of bioprosthetic valve tissue encased in a metal stent frame, antithrombotic therapy recommendations cannot be extrapolated from prior data with differently constructed surgical bioprosthetic or mechanical valves. Data on the use of antithrombotic therapy with TAVR are a rapidly developing area of medicine. Choice of agents depends on several patient factors. Patients undergoing TAVR also have a relatively high incidence of subclinical valve thrombosis. The clinical impact of this phenomenon and the implications for antithrombotic therapy continue to evolve. It is critical for clinicians who treat patients undergoing TAVR to have a firm understanding of practice guidelines, the evolving evidence, and its implications for the use of antithrombotic therapy in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul P Dobesh
- Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Andrew M Goldsweig
- Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Cardiovascular Clinical Research, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Virk HUH, Escobar J, Rodriguez M, Bates ER, Khalid U, Jneid H, Birnbaum Y, Levine GN, Smith SC, Krittanawong C. Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Concise Review for Clinicians. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:1580. [PMID: 37511955 PMCID: PMC10381391 DOI: 10.3390/life13071580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) combines two antiplatelet agents to decrease the risk of thrombotic complications associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. Emerging data about the duration of DAPT is being published continuously. New approaches are trying to balance the time, benefits, and risks for patients taking DAPT for established cardiovascular diseases. Short-term dual DAPT of 3-6 months, or even 1 month in high-bleeding risk patients, is equivalent in terms of efficacy and effectiveness compared to long-term DAPT for patients who experienced percutaneous coronary intervention in an acute coronary syndrome setting. Prolonged DAPT beyond 12 months reduces stent thrombosis, major adverse cardiovascular events, and myocardial infarction rates but increases bleeding risk. Extended DAPT does not significantly benefit stable coronary artery disease patients in reducing stroke, myocardial infarction, or cardiovascular death. Ticagrelor and aspirin reduce cardiovascular events in stable coronary artery disease with diabetes but carry a higher bleeding risk. Antiplatelet therapy duration in atrial fibrillation patients after percutaneous coronary intervention depends on individual characteristics and bleeding risk. Antiplatelet therapy is crucial for post-coronary artery bypass graft and transcatheter aortic valve implantation; Aspirin (ASA) monotherapy is preferred. Antiplatelet therapy duration in peripheral artery disease depends on the scenario. Adding vorapaxar and cilostazol may benefit secondary prevention and claudication, respectively. Carotid artery disease patients with transient ischemic attack or stroke benefit from antiplatelet therapy and combining ASA and clopidogrel is more effective than ASA alone. The optimal duration of DAPT after carotid artery stenting is uncertain. Resistance to ASA and clopidogrel poses an incremental risk of deleterious cardiovascular events and stroke. The selection and duration of antiplatelet therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease requires careful consideration of both efficacy and safety outcomes. The use of combination therapies may provide added benefits but should be weighed against the risk of bleeding. Further research and clinical trials are needed to optimize antiplatelet treatment in different patient populations and clinical scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hafeez Ul Hassan Virk
- Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute, Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44101, USA
| | - Johao Escobar
- International Transitional Medical Graduate, American College of Physician, Philadelphia, PA 19106, USA
| | - Mario Rodriguez
- John T Milliken Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Section of Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Eric R Bates
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Umair Khalid
- Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Hani Jneid
- Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Houston, TX 77555, USA
| | - Yochai Birnbaum
- Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Glenn N Levine
- Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sidney C Smith
- Division of Cardiology, McAllister Heart Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Chayakrit Krittanawong
- Cardiology Division, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ten Berg J, Rocca B, Angiolillo DJ, Hayashida K. The search for optimal antithrombotic therapy in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: facts and uncertainties. Eur Heart J 2022; 43:4616-4634. [PMID: 36130256 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Revised: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a minimally invasive procedure, which is used frequently in patients with symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis. Most patients undergoing TAVI are over 80 years of age with a high bleeding as well as thrombotic risk. Despite the increasing safety of the procedure, thromboembolic events [stroke, (subclinical) valve thrombosis] remain prevalent. As a consequence, antithrombotic prophylaxis is routinely used and only recently new data on the efficacy and safety of antithrombotic drugs has become available. On the other hand, these antithrombotic drugs increase bleeding in a population with unique aortic stenosis-related bleeding characteristics (such as acquired von Willebrand factor defect and angiodysplasia). In this review, we discuss the impact of thromboembolic and bleeding events, the current optimal antithrombotic therapy based on registries and recent randomized controlled trials, as well as try to give a practical guide how to treat these high-risk patients. Finally, we discuss knowledge gaps and future research needed to fill these gaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jurrien Ten Berg
- Department of Cardiology and Center for Platelet Function Research, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.,The Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bianca Rocca
- Department of Safety and Bioethics, Section of Pharmacology, Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Dominick J Angiolillo
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Kentaro Hayashida
- Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Srivastava A, Smazil J, Roark L, Shah HA, Balkhy HH, Shah AP. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients undergoing robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass: A case series. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:988029. [PMID: 36172589 PMCID: PMC9510675 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.988029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been utilized to treat patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS). Recent trials suggest comparable efficacy compared to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Robotic off-pump totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass graft surgery (TECAB) had been shown to be a minimally invasive revascularization strategy with clinical results comparable to traditional coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). Traditionally, pre-surgical coronary evaluation is considered necessary to optimize coronary revascularization at the time of AVR. The 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients with Valvular Disease gives a moderate recommendation, based on limited data, for CABG at the time of AVR in patients with significant coronary artery disease (CAD). This paper presents two patients with known significant CAD awaiting robotic TECAB who were treated with TAVR, prior to surgical revascularization. Robotic TECAB is unique in that it offers patients the ability to have complete coronary revascularization without a sternotomy and with early ambulation, discharge, and recovery. The case series demonstrates a hybrid approach that offers complete sternotomy sparing cardiovascular care to treat severe symptomatic AS and CAD. Since patients with severe aortic stenosis are at high risk of developing cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock upon induction of anesthesia, the ability to treat severe symptomatic AS with TAVR under conscious sedation prior to TECAB can be considered as a safe an effective treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankur Srivastava
- Section of Cardiology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
- *Correspondence: Ankur Srivastava
| | - Jennifer Smazil
- Section of Cardiology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Lauren Roark
- Section of Cardiology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Hayla A. Shah
- University of Chicago Laboratory Schools, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Husam H. Balkhy
- Section of Cardiac Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Atman P. Shah
- Section of Cardiology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
van Ginkel DJ, Bor WL, Veenstra L, van 't Hof AWJ, Fabris E. Evolving concepts in the management of antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Eur J Intern Med 2022; 101:14-20. [PMID: 35623935 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2022.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Revised: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Thromboembolic and bleeding complications negatively impact recovery and survival after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Particularly, there is a considerable risk of ischaemic stroke and vascular access related bleeding, as well as spontaneous gastro-intestinal bleeding. Therefore, benefit and harm of antithrombotic therapy should be carefully balanced. This review summarizes current evidence on peri- and post-procedural antithrombotic treatment. Indeed, in recent years, the management of antithrombotic therapy after TAVI has evolved from intensive, expert opinion-based strategies, towards a deescalated, evidence-based approach. Besides per procedural administration of unfractionated heparin, this encompasses single antiplatelet therapy in patients without a concomitant indication for oral anticoagulation (OAC); and OAC monotherapy in patients with such indication, mainly being atrial fibrillation. Combination therapy should generally be avoided to reduce bleeding risk, except after recent coronary stenting where a period of dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus P2Y12-inhibitor) or P2Y12-inhibitor plus OAC (in patients with an independent indication for OAC) is recommended to prevent stent thrombosis. This new paradigm in which reduced antithrombotic intensity leads to improved patient safety, without a loss of efficacy, may be particularly suitable for elderly and fragile patients. Whether this holds in upcoming populations of younger and lower-risk patients and in specific populations as patients with subclinical valve thrombosis, is yet to be proven. Finally, whether less intensive or alternative approaches should be also applied for the periprocedural management of the antithrombotic therapy, has to be determined by ongoing and future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Jan van Ginkel
- Department of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Willem L Bor
- Department of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Leo Veenstra
- Department of Cardiology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, the Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Arnoud W J van 't Hof
- Department of Cardiology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, the Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Enrico Fabris
- Cardiothoracovascular Department, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zahid S, Khan MZ, Bapaye J, Altamimi TS, Elkhapery A, Thakkar S, Nepal M, Rai D, Ullah W, Patel HP, Sattar Y, Khan MU, ur Rahman A, Balla S. Outcomes, Trends, and Predictors of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (from the National Inpatient Sample). Am J Cardiol 2022; 170:83-90. [PMID: 35193764 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2021] [Revised: 01/02/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Major bleeding has been identified as one of the most common complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with some suffering gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). This study aimed at assessing the incidence and predictors of GIB after TAVI in the United States. We performed a retrospective analysis of data from the National Inpatient Sample database from 2011 to 2018. A total of 216,023 hospitalizations for TAVI were included. Of the included patients, 2,188 (1%) patients had GIB, whereas 213,835 (99%) patients did not have GIB. The presence of arteriovenous malformation was associated with the highest odds of having a gastrointestinal bleed (odds ratio (OR) 24.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 17.13 to 35.92). Peptic ulcer disease was associated with an eightfold increased risk of bleeding (OR 8.74, 95% CI, 6.69 to 11.43) followed closely by colorectal cancer (OR 7.89, 95% CI, 5.33 to 11.70). Other comorbidities that were associated with higher propensity-matched rates of GIB were chronic kidney disease (OR 1.27,95% CI, 1.14 to 1.41), congestive heart failure (OR 1.18, 95% CI,1.06 to 1.32), liver disease (OR1.83, 95% CI,1.53 to 2.19), end-stage renal disease (OR 2.08,95% CI, 1.75 to 2.47), atrial fibrillation (OR1.63,95% CI, 1.49 to 1.78), and lung cancer (OR 2.80, 95% CI,1.77 to 4.41). Patients with GIB had higher propensity-matched rates of mortality than those without GIB, (12.1% vs 3.2%, p <0.01). Patients with GIB had a higher median cost of stay ($68,779 vs $46,995, p <0.01) and a longer length of hospital stay (11 vs 3 days, p <0.01). In conclusion, health care use and mortality are higher in hospitalizations of TAVI with a GIB. Baseline comorbidities like peptic ulcer disease, chronic kidney disease, liver disease, atrial fibrillation and, colorectal cancer are significant predictors of this adverse event.
Collapse
|
9
|
de Azevedo Filho AF, Accorsi TA, Ribeiro HB. Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Aortic Stenosis and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Implications for Management. Eur Cardiol 2021; 16:e49. [PMID: 34950245 PMCID: PMC8674631 DOI: 10.15420/ecr.2021.27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Aortic valve stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular heart disease among elderly patients. Since the pathophysiology of degenerative AS shares common pathways with atherosclerotic disease, the severity of AS in the elderly population is often concurrent to the presence of coronary artery disease (CAD). Although surgical aortic valve replacement has been the standard treatment for severe AS, the high operative morbidity and mortality in complex and fragile patients was the trigger to develop less invasive techniques. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been posed as the standard of care for elderly patients with severe AS with various risk profiles, which has meant that the concomitant management of CAD has become a crucial issue in such patients. Given the lack of randomised controlled trials evaluating the management of CAD in TAVI patients, most of the recommendations are based on retrospective cohort studies so that the Heart Team approach – together with an assessment of multiple parameters including symptoms and clinical characteristics, invasive and non-invasive ischaemic burden and anatomy – are crucial for the proper management of these patients. This article provides a review of current knowledge about assessment and therapeutic approaches for CAD and severe AS in patients undergoing TAVI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tarso Ad Accorsi
- Department of Valvular Heart Disease, Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo São Paulo, Brazil.,Samaritano Paulista Hospital São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Henrique B Ribeiro
- Samaritano Paulista Hospital São Paulo, Brazil.,Interventional Cardiology Department, Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kuno T, Yokoyama Y, Briasoulis A, Mori M, Iwagami M, Ando T, Takagi H, Bangalore S. Duration of Antiplatelet Therapy Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2021; 10:e019490. [PMID: 33870703 PMCID: PMC8200731 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.120.019490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Background Although current guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 3 to 6 months following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), there are no studies directly comparing outcomes of different durations of DAPT following TAVR. Methods and Results PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database were searched through November 2020 to identify clinical studies that investigated single antiplatelet therapy versus DAPT use following TAVR. Studies using oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet therapy concomitantly were excluded. The DAPT group was subdivided by the duration of DAPT. We extracted the risk ratios (RRs) of major or life‐threatening bleeding, stroke, and all‐cause mortality. Four randomized controlled trials, 2 propensity‐score matched studies, and 1 observational study were identified, yielding a total of 2498 patients who underwent TAVR assigned to the single antiplatelet therapy group (n=1249), 3‐month DAPT group (n=485), or 6‐month DAPT group (n=764). Pooled analyses demonstrated that when compared with the single antiplatelet therapy group, the rates of major or life‐threatening bleeding were significantly higher in the 3‐ and 6‐month DAPT groups (RR [95% CI]=2.13 [1.33–3.40], P=0.016; RR [95% CI]=2.54 [1.49–4.33], P=0.007, respectively) with no difference between the 3‐month DAPT versus 6‐month DAPT groups. The rates of stroke and all‐cause mortality were similar among the 3 groups. Conclusions In this network meta‐analysis of antiplatelet therapy following TAVR, single antiplatelet therapy with aspirin had lower bleeding without increasing stroke or death when compared with either 3‐ or 6‐month DAPT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshiki Kuno
- Department of Medicine Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiMount Sinai Beth Israel New York NY
| | - Yujiro Yokoyama
- Department of Surgery St. Luke's University Health Network Bethlehem PA
| | - Alexandros Briasoulis
- Division of Cardiology, Heart Failure and Transplantation University of Iowa Iowa City IA
| | - Makoto Mori
- Division of Cardiac Surgery Yale School of Medicine New Haven CT
| | - Masao Iwagami
- Department of Health Services Research University of Tsukuba Japan
| | - Tomo Ando
- Department of Cardiology Kawasaki Saiwai Hospital Kawasaki Japan
| | - Hisato Takagi
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery Shizuoka Medical Center Shizuoka Japan
| | - Sripal Bangalore
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine New York University School of Medicine New York NY
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ko E, Park DW. Optimal Antithrombotic Strategy After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Is the "Less Is More" Concept Always Better? J Am Heart Assoc 2021; 10:e021241. [PMID: 33870701 PMCID: PMC8200736 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.121.021241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Euihong Ko
- Division of Cardiology Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine Seoul Korea
| | - Duk-Woo Park
- Division of Cardiology Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine Seoul Korea
| |
Collapse
|