Evidence-to-Practice Gap for Preventing Procedure-Related Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Safety, feasibility, and incremental value of ultralow and zero contrast PCI in an all-comers registry

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic kidney disease and CAD have been denied revascularization because of fear of precipitating acute renal failure from contrast exposure. Skepticism on whether Ultra-Low contrast percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or Zero contrast PCI (ULC/ZC PCI) can be safely performed has limited its adoption.

METHODS

This observational registry enrolled 200 consecutive patients referred for elective PCI at a single center from June 2021 to December 2022. The study investigated whether the clinical outcomes of PCI performed with UL/ZC-PCI (n-48) were comparable to outcomes following standard PCI (n-152).

RESULTS

Both groups were well matched in baseline and procedural characteristics. The groups had a highly statistical difference in the use of CV. Mean CV was 19.17 ± 7.29 cc in the ULC/ZC-group and 147.14 ± 73.55 cc in the control arm. The principal findings of the study were that the incidence of ontrast-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) was eightfold lower in patients receiving UL/ZC compared to the control group that received standard PCI. The incidence of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction and major bleeding were similar in both groups. At 6 months, the decrement in renal function was lower in the group that received lower volumes of contrast.

CONCLUSIONS

This single center observational registry demonstrated that UL-C/ZC-PCI is safe and effective in a broad spectrum of complex lesions. The skillsets needed to perform this are teachable, widely applicable and do not require a large upgrade of capital equipment. AKI rates and decrement in renal function at 6 months were both significantly lower in the UL-ZC group.

CHA2DS2-VASc, a Simple Clinical Score Expanding Its Boundaries to Predict Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

Objective

Promising results of CHA₂DS₂-VASc score have been reported for the prediction of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, data of its predictive strength in the context of primary PCI are not available. Therefore, in this study, we have assessed predictive value of CHA₂DS₂-VASc score for CI-AKI after primary PCI.

Methods

This analytical cross-sectional study was conducted between January 2021 and June 2021 at the National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Karachi, Pakistan. Inclusion criteria of the study was consecutive adult patients who had undergone primary PCI. Baseline CHA₂DS₂-VASc score was calculated, and either a 25% or 0.5 mg/dL increase in post-procedure serum creatinine level as compared to baseline level was categorized as CI-AKI.

Results

A total of 691 patients were included, of which 82.1% (567) were male. CI-AKI after primary PCI was observed in 63 (9.1%) patients, out of which 66.7% (42) of patients had CHA₂DS₂-VASc score of ≥2. The area under the curve (AUC) for the score was 0.725 [0.662 to 0.788] with a sensitivity and specificity of 66.7% [63.1% to 70.2%] and 66.7% [53.7% to 78.1%], respectively, at a cut-off value of ≥2. In multivariable analysis, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤30% and CHA₂DS₂-VASc ≥2 were found to be independent predictors with adjusted odds ratios of 2.19 [1.06–4.5] and 2.13 [1.13–4.01], respectively.

Conclusion

CHA₂DS₂-VASc score has a good predictive value for the prediction of CI-AKI after primary PCI. Criteria of CHA₂DS₂-VASc ≥2 can be used for the risk stratification of CI-AKI after primary PCI.