1
|
Nuthalapati U, Bathinapattla MR, Cardoso RP, Jesi NJ, Singh K, Moradi I, Gostomczyk K, Afzal M, Omer MB, Mian ZR, Patel S, Sachdeva P, Malik MN, Abbas M, Singh J, Shafique MA. Mitral valve repair and replacement in infectious endocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcome. Egypt Heart J 2024; 76:134. [PMID: 39365370 PMCID: PMC11452577 DOI: 10.1186/s43044-024-00564-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 09/19/2024] [Indexed: 10/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infective endocarditis (IE) poses significant clinical challenges, often necessitating surgical intervention for improved patient outcomes. The choice between mitral valve repair (MVP) and mitral valve replacement (MVR) is crucial in managing IE. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the effectiveness of MVP and MVR in treating IE, focusing on outcomes such as postoperative bleeding, mortality, recurrent endocarditis, and stroke. MAIN TEXT A comprehensive literature search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Studies directly comparing MVP and MVR in IE patients were included. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed, and meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan software. Thirty-two studies involving 82,123 patients were included. MVP was associated with significantly lower rates of postoperative bleeding (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.40-0.84) and reduced long-term mortality (OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.32-0.51) compared to MVR. However, MVR showed lower rates of recurrent endocarditis. MVP was also associated with a decreased likelihood of postoperative stroke (OR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.40-0.68).2, 4 CONCLUSIONS: MVP demonstrates advantages over MVR in reducing postoperative bleeding, long-term mortality, and stroke risk in IE patients. However, individual patient factors and surgical expertise must be considered in treatment decisions. Further research, including randomized controlled trials, is needed to validate these findings and refine treatment algorithms for IE management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umesh Nuthalapati
- Ivano Frankivsk National Medical University, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
| | | | | | - Nusrat Jahan Jesi
- Shaheed Syed Nazrul Islam Medical College and Hospital, Kishoregonj, Bangladesh
| | | | - Iman Moradi
- School of Medicine, St. Georges' University, St. George's, Grenada
| | - Karol Gostomczyk
- Collegium Medicum Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Maham Afzal
- Fatima Jinnah Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan
| | | | | | - Soham Patel
- Teaching University Geomedi, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | | | | | | | - Jugraj Singh
- Verde Valley Medical Center, Cottonwood, AZ, 86326, USA
| | - Muhammad Ashir Shafique
- Department of Medicine, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Rafiqi H J Shaheed Road, Karachi, 75510, Pakistan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Albacker T, Tash A, Alamri H, Alasnag M, Alkashkari W, Almutairi F, Alqoofi F, Alsaileek A, Aluthman U, Alzahrani G, Balghith M, Makhdom F. Saudi Heart Association/National Heart Center/Saudi Arabian Cardiac Interventional Society/Saudi Society for Cardiac Surgeons/Saudi Cardiac Imaging Group 2023 TAVI Guidelines. J Saudi Heart Assoc 2024; 36:184-231. [PMID: 39234557 PMCID: PMC11373420 DOI: 10.37616/2212-5043.1379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2024] [Revised: 05/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 09/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Saudi Arabia has seen a significant improvement in its healthcare system over the past four decades resulting in an increase in life-expectancy. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has spread widely in Saudi Arabia and has become a routine procedure in many centers. The expanding clinical indications and the availability of the technology have made it possible for many large and intermediate centers all over the country to commence their own TAVI programs. So, the aim of this document is to standardize TAVI practices in different Saudi Arabian centers through reasonable guidelines based on the evaluation and summarization of the best available evidence. The review committee, composed of different experts in several aspects of the management of patient undergoing TAVI, based their recommendations on the reviewed and analyzed evidence and the class and level of recommendations were discussed until a consensus was reached by the panel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Turki Albacker
- Cardiac Sciences Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- King Fahad Cardiac Center, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Adel Tash
- National Heart Center, Saudi Health Council, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Mirvat Alasnag
- Cardiac Center, King Fahd Armed Forces Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Wail Alkashkari
- King Abdulaziz Medical City - Jeddah and King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fawaz Almutairi
- King Abdulaziz Medical City - Riyadh and King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Ahmed Alsaileek
- King Abdulaziz Medical City - Riyadh and King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Saudi Arabia
| | - Uthman Aluthman
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Mohammed Balghith
- King Abdulaziz Medical City - Riyadh and King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fahd Makhdom
- Imam Abdul Rahman Bin Faisal University, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hatab T, Zaid S, Thakkar SJ, Bou Chaaya RG, Goel SS, Reardon MJ. Infection of Transcatheter Valvular Devices. Curr Cardiol Rep 2024; 26:767-775. [PMID: 38806975 DOI: 10.1007/s11886-024-02076-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review explores the epidemiology, clinical traits, and diagnosis of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement-Associated Infective Endocarditis (TAVR-IE) and mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair infective endocarditis (TEER-IE), focusing on a multimodal imaging approach. It addresses the rising prevalence of TAVR and TEER, emphasizing the need to understand long-term complications and clinical consequences, which poses significant challenges despite advancements in valve technology. RECENT FINDINGS Studies report a variable incidence of TAVR-IE and TEER-IE influenced by diverse patient risk profiles and procedural factors. Younger age, male gender, and certain comorbidities emerge as patient-related risk factors. Procedure-related factors include intervention location, valve type, and technical aspects. Microbiologically, Staphylococcus aureus, Viridans Group Streptococcus, and Enterococcus are frequently encountered pathogens. TAVR-IE and TEER-IE diagnosis involves a multimodal imaging approach due to limitations in echocardiography. Blood cultures and imaging aid identification, with Fluorescence in situ hybridization is showing promise. Treatment encompasses medical management with antibiotics and, when necessary, surgical intervention. The management approach requires a multidisciplinary "Endocarditis Team." This review underscores the need for continued research to refine risk prediction, enhance diagnostic accuracy, and optimize management strategies for TAVR-IE, considering the evolving landscape of transcatheter interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taha Hatab
- Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Allison Family Distinguished Chair of Cardiovascular Research, 6550 Fannin Street, Office 1401, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Syed Zaid
- Baylor School of Medicine and the Michael E DeBakey VAMC, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Samarthkumar J Thakkar
- Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Allison Family Distinguished Chair of Cardiovascular Research, 6550 Fannin Street, Office 1401, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Rody G Bou Chaaya
- Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Allison Family Distinguished Chair of Cardiovascular Research, 6550 Fannin Street, Office 1401, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Sachin S Goel
- Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Allison Family Distinguished Chair of Cardiovascular Research, 6550 Fannin Street, Office 1401, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Michael J Reardon
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Allison Family Distinguished Chair of Cardiovascular Research, 6550 Fannin Street, Office 1401, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Galeone A, Perrone F, Pesarini G, Ribichini FL, Di Gaetano R, Luciani GB, Onorati F. Ten-Year Experience with a Transapical Approach for Transcatheter Aortic and Mitral Valve Implantation. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 2024; 11:201. [PMID: 39057621 PMCID: PMC11277261 DOI: 10.3390/jcdd11070201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2024] [Revised: 06/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The transfemoral approach represents the optimal access for TAVI due to its low invasiveness; however, up to 10-15% of TAVI candidates are considered unsuitable for femoral access because of significant peripheral vascular disease and need alternative access. METHODS This is a single-center retrospective observational study including all consecutive adult patients undergoing transcatheter procedures through a TA approach from March 2015 to April 2024. RESULTS 213 patients underwent transcatheter aortic or mitral valve implantation through a TA approach and were enrolled in this study. The mean age of the patients was 79.5 ± 5.7 years, and 54% of the patients were males. The mean Euroscore II was 7.9 ± 6.4%. One-third of the patients had previous cardiac surgery. The overall mean survival time was 5.3 ± 0.3 years. Nine (4%) patients developed infective endocarditis (IE) during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The transapical approach for transcatheter procedures is a safe and effective procedure for patients unsuitable for TF access with low periprocedural mortality and a low rate of post-procedural complications when performed by experienced surgeons and cardiologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonella Galeone
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics and Gynecology, Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Fabiola Perrone
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics and Gynecology, Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Gabriele Pesarini
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | | | - Renato Di Gaetano
- Department of Cardiology, Azienda Sanitaria dell’Alto Adige, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
| | - Giovanni Battista Luciani
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics and Gynecology, Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Onorati
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics and Gynecology, Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Prinzing A, Boehm J, Burri M, Schreyer J, Lange R, Krane M. Midterm results after aortic valve neocuspidization. JTCVS Tech 2024; 25:35-42. [PMID: 38899113 PMCID: PMC11184442 DOI: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2024.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 01/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives Aortic valve neocuspidization with autologous pericardium is gaining increasing attention as a surgical treatment option for aortic valve disease. However, little is known about midterm durability and valve-related events. Methods Patients undergoing aortic valve neocuspidization between 2016 and 2021 were included. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed before the operation, at discharge, and annually thereafter. Data were analyzed for incidences of structural valve deterioration, bioprosthetic valve failure, survival, freedom from reoperation, and hemodynamic performance. Results A total of 162 patients underwent aortic valve neocuspidization (mean age, 52.6 ± 16.6 years; range, 13-78 years); 114 (70.4%) were male. A total of 132 patients presented with a bicuspid aortic valve (81.5%) and 126 patients presented with aortic valve stenosis (77.8%). Concomitant procedures were performed in 63 patients (38.9%). Mean follow-up was 3.5 ± 1.2 years. At discharge, peak and mean pressure gradients were 15.6 ± 7.2 mm Hg and 8.4 ± 3.7 mm Hg, respectively, with a mean effective orifice area of 2.4 ± 0.8 cm2. After 5 years, peak and mean pressure gradients were 14.5 ± 4.6 mm Hg and 7.5 ± 2.2 mm Hg, respectively, with a mean effective orifice area of 2.3 ± 0.8 cm2. At 5 years, cumulative incidences of moderate and severe structural valve deterioration and bioprosthetic valve failure were 9.82% ± 3.87%, 6.96% ± 3.71%, and 12.1% ± 4.12%, respectively. Survival was 97.3% ± 1.4%, and freedom from reoperation was 91.3% ± 2.4%. Conclusions Aortic valve neocuspidization accomplishes low pressure gradients early after initial surgery and during follow-up. Survival in this young patient population is excellent. The main reason for reoperation is endocarditis, and rates for structural valve degeneration are low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anatol Prinzing
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Institute Insure, German Heart Center Munich, School of Medicine & Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Johannes Boehm
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Institute Insure, German Heart Center Munich, School of Medicine & Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Melchior Burri
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Institute Insure, German Heart Center Munich, School of Medicine & Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Julia Schreyer
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Institute Insure, German Heart Center Munich, School of Medicine & Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Lange
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Institute Insure, German Heart Center Munich, School of Medicine & Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Markus Krane
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Institute Insure, German Heart Center Munich, School of Medicine & Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn
- DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Monaci C, Nair AN, Gilukara SS, Tummala T, J S, Fatima S, Gupta R, Sabu N, Nagra HM, Colca Herrera AV, Al-Tawil M. Clinical Profiles and Outcomes of Prosthesis-Specific Infective Endocarditis Subsequent to Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus 2024; 16:e59398. [PMID: 38817491 PMCID: PMC11139492 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) is a rare but serious complication following aortic valve replacement using either a transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). This study aims to review the profiles and outcomes of PVE after surgical versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Electronic searches were performed on Scopus, EMBASE, and PubMed to retrieve related articles. To be included, study designs had to be randomized controlled trials (RCT) or observational cohort studies (in English) with PVE patients that compared differences based on TAVI or SAVR. This review included data for 13,221 patients with PVE diagnoses. Of those, 2,109 patients had an initial SAVR, and 11,112 patients had an initial TAVI. There was no difference in the incidence of PVE in patients who had initial TAVI versus SAVR (1.05% versus 1.01% per person-year, p=0.98). However, the onset of early PVE was more frequently observed in the TAVI group (risk ratio (RR): 1.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.14, 2.08], p=0.005). Patients in the TAVI group had a lower indication for surgery to treat PVE when compared to SAVR (RR: 0.55, 95%CI [0.44, 0.69], p<0.001). Staphylococcus aureus was more likely to be the source of PVE in patients who had previous TAVI (RR: 1.34, 95%CI [1.17, 1.54], p<0.001). Also, Enterococcus faecalis was more frequently observed as a cause of PVE in the TAVI group (RR: 1.49, 95%CI [1.21, 1.82], p<0.001). Patients who underwent SAVR and TAVI had similar incidences of PVE. However, patients who underwent SAVR had a greater indication for surgery to treat PVE, while those who underwent TAVI had higher comorbidities, a higher likelihood of early PVE, and a trend towards higher one-year mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Shreenithi J
- Internal Medicine, Stanley Medical College, Chennai, IND
| | | | - Riya Gupta
- Medicine and Surgery, Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, IND
| | - Nagma Sabu
- Surgery, Jonelta Foundation School of Medicine University of Perpetual Help System Dalta, Las Pinas, PHL
| | - Hira M Nagra
- Internal Medicine, Shaikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al-Nahyan Medical and Dental College, Lahore, PAK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ried ID, Omran H, Potratz M, Rudolph TK, Scholtz S, Bleiziffer S, Piper C. Infective endocarditis after isolated aortic valve replacement: comparison between catheter-interventional and surgical valve replacement. Clin Res Cardiol 2024; 113:336-352. [PMID: 38170247 PMCID: PMC10850222 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-023-02356-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) is the prognostically most unfavourable complication after aortic valve replacement. This study aims to contribute to a better understanding of the different pathological and therapeutical aspects between PVE following surgical (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI). METHODS All patients who had undergone primary isolated SAVR (n = 3447) or TAVI (n = 2269) at our Centre between 01/2012 and 12/2018 were analysed. Diagnosis of PVE was based on Duke criteria modified in 2015. Incidence, risk factors, pathogens, impact of complications or therapy on mortality were analysed and compared between SAVR- and TAVI-PVE. RESULTS PVE incidence did not differ significantly after SAVR with 4.9/100 patient-years and TAVI with 2.4/100 patient-years (p = 0.49), although TAVI patients were older (mean 80 vs. 67 years) and had more comorbidities (STS score mean 5.9 vs. 1.6) (p < 0.001). TAVI prostheses with polymer showed a 4.3-fold higher risk to develop PVE than without polymer (HR 4.3; p = 0.004). Most common pathogens were staphylococci and enterococci (p > 0.05). Propensity-score matching analysis showed that the type of aortic valve replacement had no effect on the development of post-procedural PVE (p = 0.997). One-year survival was higher in TAVI-PVE patients treated with antibiotics only compared to additional surgical therapy (90.9% vs. 33.3%; p = 0.005). In SAVR-PVE patients, both therapies were comparable in terms of survival (p = 0.861). However, SAVR-PVE patients who were not operated, despite ESC-guideline recommendation, had significantly poorer one-year survival (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION TAVI patients did not have a significantly higher risk to develop PVE. Our data suggest that TAVI-PVE patients in contrast to SAVR-PVE patients can more often be treated with antibiotics only, presumably due to the lack of a polymeric suture ring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle D Ried
- Clinic for General and Interventional Cardiology/Angiology, Herz- Und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Georgstr. 11, 32545, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| | - Hazem Omran
- Clinic for General and Interventional Cardiology/Angiology, Herz- Und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Georgstr. 11, 32545, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| | - Max Potratz
- Clinic for General and Interventional Cardiology/Angiology, Herz- Und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Georgstr. 11, 32545, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| | - Tanja K Rudolph
- Clinic for General and Interventional Cardiology/Angiology, Herz- Und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Georgstr. 11, 32545, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| | - Smita Scholtz
- Clinic for General and Interventional Cardiology/Angiology, Herz- Und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Georgstr. 11, 32545, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| | - Sabine Bleiziffer
- Clinic for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Herz- Und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| | - Cornelia Piper
- Clinic for General and Interventional Cardiology/Angiology, Herz- Und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Georgstr. 11, 32545, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Magyari B, Kittka B, Goják I, Kasza G, Schönfeld K, Szapáry LB, Simon M, Kiss R, Bertalan A, Várady E, Gyimesi A, Szokodi I, Horváth I. Single center experience with the balloon-expandable Myval transcatheter aortic valve system with the first 100 patients: 30-day and 1-year follow-up. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2023; 102:1317-1330. [PMID: 37870123 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.30868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To report our single-center data, regarding the first 100 patients who underwent TAVR procedure with the new balloon-expandable MYVAL system. We report 30-day and 1-year outcomes in low to high-risk TAVR patient population. METHODS From November 2019 to July 2021, 100 consecutive patients underwent TAVR procedure. Patient outcome was classified according to the VARC-2 definitions. The device performance was assessed using transthoracic echocardiography. Data collection was allowed by the Local Ethical Committee. RESULTS The mean age was 74.7 years, 63 (63%) were male. The mean Euroscore II and STS score were 4.8 ± 4.9 and 5.6 ± 3.9, respectively. Transfemoral access was the most frequent (surgical vs. percutaneous 2% vs. 97%) and in one patient surgical subclavian access was used. VARC-2 outcomes were as follows: device success 99%, STROKE 1%, major and minor vascular complication was 1% and 11%, respectively, the rate of new permanent pacemaker implantation was 30.7%. At discharge, the incidence of grade I, grade II aortic regurgitation was 39% and 1%, respectively, without relevant PVL. In-hospital mortality was only 1%. These results included a high proportion (17%) of patients with bicuspid aortic valves. At 1 year, the all-cause mortality rate was 7% (only two due to cardiac event) and only a single patient had valve-related dysfunction requiring surgical aortic replacement. CONCLUSIONS TAVR procedure with MYVAL transcatheter heart valve system shows excellent 30-day and 1-year outcomes regarding patient survival, technical success, and valve-related adverse events. The limitations of our study comprise a single-center study with retrospective data collection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Balázs Magyari
- Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
- Szentágothai Research Centre, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Bálint Kittka
- Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
- Szentágothai Research Centre, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Ilona Goják
- Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Gábor Kasza
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Kristóf Schönfeld
- Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
- Szentágothai Research Centre, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - László Botond Szapáry
- Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
- Szentágothai Research Centre, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Mihály Simon
- Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
- Szentágothai Research Centre, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Rudolf Kiss
- Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Andrea Bertalan
- Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Edit Várady
- Department of Medical Imaging, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - András Gyimesi
- EconNet Research Group, Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - István Szokodi
- Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
- Szentágothai Research Centre, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Iván Horváth
- Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
- Szentágothai Research Centre, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Slouha E, Rood C, Burle VS, Al-Geizi H, Clunes LA, Kollias TF. Infective Endocarditis Following Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2023; 15:e49048. [PMID: 38116334 PMCID: PMC10728577 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.49048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Aortic valve replacement (AVR) successfully treats aortic valve stenosis and aortic regurgitation from aging or bicuspid aortic valves. The procedure intends to restore the obstructed left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT). AVR can be performed surgically (surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR); open heart) or via transcatheter (transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)), typically done through a femoral approach as a minimally invasive procedure, allowing for quicker recovery and reduced hospital stays. AVR has many complications, including life-threatening ones, such as infective endocarditis (IE), retarding the recovery process and increasing mortality following surgery. IE is an uncommon and deadly condition that involves multiple organ systems and is caused by bacteremia stemming from a microorganism that enters the bloodstream. Many manifestations are involved in the development of IE, such as fevers, flu-like symptoms, splinter hemorrhages, Osler nodes, abscesses, and vegetations found on the valves at the leaflets. Vegetations and abscesses tend to create further complications, such as stroke and acute kidney injury, as emboli block blood flow, leading to ischemia and damage. This paper aims to evaluate the difference in SAVR- and TAVR-associated IE, as the goal is to elucidate a danger that diminishes the positive effects of either procedure despite its rarity. Studies have been inconclusive in determining whether or not there is a trend, let alone a difference in incident rates. Both procedures share similar risk factors, but SAVR-associated IE is usually caused by Staphylococcus aureus, and studies indicate possibly Enterococcus spp. in TAVR-associated IE. Incident rates of IE are much higher than they should be, whether or not they differ between procedures, and future research needs to consider the pathways and risk factors that can be used to reduce the occurrence of AVR-associated IE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan Slouha
- Anatomical Sciences, St. George's University School of Medicine, St. George's, GRD
| | - Catherine Rood
- Pharmacology, St. George's University School of Medicine, St. George's, GRD
| | - Venkata Sathya Burle
- Anatomical Sciences, St. George's University School of Medicine, St. George's, GRD
| | - Hanin Al-Geizi
- Pharmacology, St. George's University School of Medicine, St. George's, GRD
| | - Lucy A Clunes
- Pharmacology, St George's University, St. George's, GRD
| | - Theofanis F Kollias
- Microbiology, Immunology and Pharmacology, St. George's University School of Medicine, St. George's, GRD
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Brankovic M, Hashemi A, Ansari J, Sharma A. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Valve Infective Endocarditis: A Systematic Review and Call for Action. Cardiol Ther 2023; 12:297-306. [PMID: 37079182 DOI: 10.1007/s40119-023-00314-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023] Open
Abstract
We aimed to systematically analyze the literature on the use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) to treat active aortic valve infective endocarditis (AV-IE). Surgery is declined in one-third of patients with IE who meet indications because of prohibitive surgical risk. TAVR might be an alternative for selected patients with AV-IE as a bridge-to-surgery or stand-alone therapy. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched (2002-2022) for studies on TAVR use in active AV-IE. Of 450 identified reports, six met inclusion criteria (all men, mean age 71 ± 12 years, median Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score 27, EuroSCORE 56). All patients were prohibitive surgical risk candidates. Five out of six patients had severe, and one patient had moderate aortic regurgitation on presentation. Five out of six patients had prosthetic valve endocarditis after surgical valve replacement 13 years before (median), and one patient had TAVR a year before hospitalization. All patients had cardiogenic shock as the indication for TAVR. Four patients received balloon-expanding, and two patients received self-expanding TAVR after a median of 19 (IQR 9-25) days from diagnosis of IE. No death or myocardial infarction occurred, but one patient had a stroke within the first 30 days. The median event-free time was 9 (IQR 6-14) months including no death, reinfection, relapse IE, or valve-related rehospitalization. Our review suggests that TAVR can be considered as an adjuvant therapy to medical treatment for selected patients in whom surgery is indicated for treatment of acute heart failure due to aortic valve destruction and incompetence caused by infective endocarditis, but who have a prohibitive surgical risk. Nonetheless, a well-designed prospective registry is urgently needed to investigate the outcomes of TAVR for this off-label indication. No evidence exists for using the TAVR to treat infection-related surgical indications such as uncontrolled infection or control of septic embolization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milos Brankovic
- Department of Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
- Transatlantic Cardiovascular Study Group, Bloomfield, NJ, USA
| | - Ashkan Hashemi
- Department of Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Julia Ansari
- Department of Cardiology, Newark Beth Israel Medical Center, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Abhishek Sharma
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jena N, Patel K, Desai R, Siddiqui N, Ahluwalia G, Halabi AR, Schwartz C, Krishnan S. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement to Treat Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis After Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. Cureus 2023; 15:e38021. [PMID: 37228546 PMCID: PMC10205151 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.38021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) is an uncommon complication after heart valve replacement surgery that can result in increased morbidity and mortality. Current guidelines for management of PVE recommend antibiotic therapy followed by surgical valve replacement. The number of aortic valve replacements is expected to rise in the coming years with the expanded indications for use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with low, intermediate, and high surgical risk, as well as in patients with a failed aortic bioprosthetic valve. Current guidelines do not address the use of valve-in-valve (ViV) TAVR for management of PVE in patients who are at high risk for surgical intervention. The authors present a case of a patient with aortic valve PVE after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR); he was treated with valve-in-valve (ViV) TAVR due to the high surgical risk. The patient was discharged, but he returned to the hospital with PVE and valve dehiscence 14 months after ViV TAVR, after which he successfully underwent re-operative SAVR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nihar Jena
- Cardiovascular Medicine, St. Joseph Mercy Oakland Hospital, Pontiac, USA
| | - Kinjal Patel
- Anesthesiology, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, USA
| | - Ronak Desai
- Anesthesiology, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, USA
| | | | - Guneet Ahluwalia
- Cardiovascular Medicine, St. Joseph Mercy Oakland Hospital, Pontiac, USA
| | - Abdul R Halabi
- Cardiovascular Medicine, St. Joseph Mercy Oakland Hospital, Pontiac, USA
| | - Charles Schwartz
- Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Joseph Mercy Oakland Hospital, Pontiac, USA
| | - Sandeep Krishnan
- Anesthesiology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jain A, Subramani S, Gebhardt B, Hauser J, Bailey C, Ramakrishna H. Infective Endocarditis-Update for the Perioperative Clinician. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2023; 37:637-649. [PMID: 36725476 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2022.12.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Infective endocarditis is a common pathology routinely encountered by perioperative physicians. There has been a need for a comprehensive review of this important topic. In this expert review, the authors discuss in detail the incidence, etiology, definition, microbiology, and trends of infective endocarditis. The authors discuss the clinical and imaging criteria for diagnosing infective endocarditis and the perioperative considerations for the same. Other imaging modalities to evaluate infective endocarditis also are discussed. Furthermore, the authors describe in detail the clinical risk scores that are used for determining clinical prognostic criteria and how they are tied to the current societal guidelines. Knowledge about native and prosthetic valve endocarditis, with emphasis on the timing of surgical intervention-focused surgical approaches and analysis of current outcomes, are critical to managing such patients, especially high-risk patients like those with heart failure, patients with intravenous drug abuse, and with internal pacemakers and defibrillators in situ. And lastly, with the advancement of percutaneous transcatheter valves becoming a norm for the management of various valvular pathologies, the authors discuss an in-depth review of transcatheter valve endocarditis with a focus on its incidence, the timing of surgical interventions, outcome data, and management of high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankit Jain
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Medical College of Georgia & Augusta University, Augusta, GA
| | - Sudhakar Subramani
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Brian Gebhardt
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, MA
| | - Joshua Hauser
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Caryl Bailey
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Medical College of Georgia & Augusta University, Augusta, GA
| | - Harish Ramakrishna
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Risk of Infective Endocarditis Associated with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Propensity Score-Based Analysis. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12020586. [PMID: 36675515 PMCID: PMC9864366 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12020586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Revised: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Infective endocarditis (IE) is a feared complication after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR)/transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). It is not certain which procedure carries a higher risk. Our aim was to assess the risk of IE after SAVR/TAVI. Methods: We conducted an observational study of a prospective cohort, including patients with TAVI/SAVR, from March 2015 to December 2020. IE was defined according to the modified Duke’s criteria. IE occurring during the first 12 months of the procedure was considered early IE, and an episode occurring after 12 months was considered late IE. The propensity score was designed to include variables previously associated with TAVI/SAVR and IE. An inverse probability of treatment weight was generated. Results: In total, 355 SAVR and 278 TAVI were included. Median follow-up, 38 vs. 41 months, p = 0.550. IE occurred in 5 SAVR (1.41%, 95% CI 0.2−2.6) vs. 13 TAVI (4.65%, 95% CI 2.2−7.2), p = 0.016. TAVI patients had more frequent early IE (3.2% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.006). In the PS analyses, IE risk did not differ: OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.32−1.32. Factors associated with TAVI IE included younger age (74y vs. 83y, p = 0.030), complicated diabetes mellitus (38.5% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.002), COPD (46.2% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.015), advanced heart failure (100% vs. 52.9%, p < 0.001), and peripheral arteriopathy (61.5% vs. 26.7%, p = 0.011). Conclusions: Early IE was higher with TAVI, but in the PS analyses, the risk attributable to each procedure was similar. Studies are needed to identify and optimize the risk factors of IE prior to TAVI.
Collapse
|
14
|
Kouijzer JJP, Noordermeer DJ, van Leeuwen WJ, Verkaik NJ, Lattwein KR. Native valve, prosthetic valve, and cardiac device-related infective endocarditis: A review and update on current innovative diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Front Cell Dev Biol 2022; 10:995508. [PMID: 36263017 PMCID: PMC9574252 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.995508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Infective endocarditis (IE) is a life-threatening microbial infection of native and prosthetic heart valves, endocardial surface, and/or indwelling cardiac device. Prevalence of IE is increasing and mortality has not significantly improved despite technological advances. This review provides an updated overview using recent literature on the clinical presentation, diagnosis, imaging, causative pathogens, treatment, and outcomes in native valve, prosthetic valve, and cardiac device-related IE. In addition, the experimental approaches used in IE research to improve the understanding of disease mechanisms and the current diagnostic pipelines are discussed, as well as potential innovative diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. This will ultimately help towards deriving better diagnostic tools and treatments to improve IE patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joop J. P. Kouijzer
- Thoraxcenter, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Daniëlle J. Noordermeer
- Thoraxcenter, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Wouter J. van Leeuwen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Nelianne J. Verkaik
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Kirby R. Lattwein
- Thoraxcenter, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Costa G, Reddavid C, Dipietro E, Barbanti M. Managing complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Expert Rev Med Devices 2022; 19:599-612. [PMID: 36150162 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2022.2129009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become a streamlined and standardized procedure, different complications still remain and need the operators to be properly trained about their management. AREAS COVERED This review article aims at offering a practical overview of the most impactful TAVI complications, analyzing, and discussing the potential risk factors, and focusing on the available strategies for their management. EXPERT OPINION Complications following TAVI have been decreasing thanks to technical advancements and operators experience. The thorough knowledge of potential complications and their prevention played a key role in the decreasing of complications rates. Pre-procedural, computed tomography angiography assessment of patient's anatomical characteristics, allows to properly choose and tailor the best strategy for managing complications in most of cases. Nevertheless, further research is required to shed lights about the optimal strategies to adopt for managing TAVI complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuliano Costa
- Division of Cardiology, C.A.S.T., Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico "G. Rodolico - San Marco", University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Claudia Reddavid
- Division of Cardiology, C.A.S.T., Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico "G. Rodolico - San Marco", University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Elena Dipietro
- Division of Cardiology, C.A.S.T., Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico "G. Rodolico - San Marco", University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Marco Barbanti
- Division of Cardiology, C.A.S.T., Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico "G. Rodolico - San Marco", University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Affiliation(s)
- Zahra Raisi-Estabragh
- Centre for Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Rodrigo Bagur
- Division of Cardiology, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mamas A Mamas
- Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Keele University, Keele, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cahill TJ, Raby J, Jewell PD, Brennan PF, Banning AP, Byrne J, Kharbanda RK, MacCarthy PA, Thornhill MH, Sandoe JAT, Spence MS, Ludman P, Hildick-Smith DJR, Redwood SR, Prendergast BD. Risk of infective endocarditis after surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Heart 2022; 108:639-647. [DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-320080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
ObjectiveTo define the incidence and risk factors for infective endocarditis (IE) following surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).MethodsAll patients who underwent first SAVR or TAVI in England between 2007 and 2016 were identified from the NICOR databases. Hospital admissions with a primary diagnosis of IE were identified by linkage with the NHS Hospital Episode Statistics database. Approval was obtained from the NHS Research Ethics Committee.Results2057 of 91 962 patients undergoing SAVR developed IE over a median follow-up of 53.9 months—an overall incidence of 4.81 [95% CI 4.61 to 5.03] per 1000 person-years. Correspondingly, 140 of 14 195 patients undergoing TAVI developed IE over a median follow-up of 24.5 months—an overall incidence of 3.57 [95% CI 3.00 to 4.21] per 1000 person-years. The cumulative incidence of IE at 60 months was higher after SAVR than after TAVI (2.4% [95% CI 2.3 to 2.5] vs 1.5% [95% CI 1.3 to 1.8], HR 1.60, p<0.001). Across the entire cohort, SAVR remained an independent predictor of IE after multivariable adjustment. Risk factors for IE included younger age, male sex, atrial fibrillation, and dialysis.ConclusionsIE is a rare complication of SAVR and TAVI. In our population, the incidence of IE was higher after SAVR than after TAVI.
Collapse
|
18
|
Del Val D, Abdel-Wahab M, Mangner N, Durand E, Ihlemann N, Urena M, Pellegrini C, Giannini F, Gasior T, Wojakowski W, Landt M, Auffret V, Sinning JM, Cheema AN, Nombela-Franco L, Chamandi C, Campelo-Parada F, Munoz-Garcia E, Herrmann HC, Testa L, Won-Keun K, Castillo JC, Alperi A, Tchetche D, Bartorelli AL, Kapadia S, Stortecky S, Amat-Santos I, Wijeysundera HC, Lisko J, Gutiérrez-Ibanes E, Serra V, Salido L, Alkhodair A, Vendramin I, Chakravarty T, Lerakis S, Vilalta V, Regueiro A, Romaguera R, Kappert U, Barbanti M, Masson JB, Maes F, Fiorina C, Miceli A, Kodali S, Ribeiro HB, Mangione JA, Sandoli de Brito F, Actis Dato GM, Rosato F, Ferreira MC, Corriea de Lima V, Colafranceschi AS, Abizaid A, Marino MA, Esteves V, Andrea J, Godinho RR, Alfonso F, Eltchaninoff H, Søndergaard L, Himbert D, Husser O, Latib A, Le Breton H, Servoz C, Pascual I, Siddiqui S, Olivares P, Hernandez-Antolin R, Webb JG, Sponga S, Makkar R, Kini AS, Boukhris M, Gervais P, Linke A, Crusius L, Holzhey D, Rodés-Cabau J. Infective Endocarditis Caused by Staphylococcus aureus After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. Can J Cardiol 2022; 38:102-112. [PMID: 34688853 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2021.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Revised: 10/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Staphylococcus aureus (SA) has been extensively studied as causative microorganism of surgical prosthetic-valve infective endocarditis (IE). However, scarce evidence exists on SA IE after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). METHODS Data were obtained from the Infectious Endocarditis After TAVR International Registry, including patients with definite IE after TAVR from 59 centres in 11 countries. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to microbiologic etiology: non-SA IE vs SA IE. RESULTS SA IE was identified in 141 patients out of 573 (24.6%), methicillin-sensitive SA in most cases (115/141, 81.6%). Self-expanding valves were more common than balloon-expandable valves in patients presenting with early SA IE. Major bleeding and sepsis complicating TAVR, neurologic symptoms or systemic embolism at admission, and IE with cardiac device involvement (other than the TAVR prosthesis) were associated with SA IE (P < 0.05 for all). Among patients with IE after TAVR, the likelihood of SA IE increased from 19% in the absence of those risk factors to 84.6% if ≥ 3 risk factors were present. In-hospital (47.8% vs 26.9%; P < 0.001) and 2-year (71.5% vs 49.6%; P < 0.001) mortality rates were higher among patients with SA IE vs non-SA IE. Surgery at the time of index SA IE episode was associated with lower mortality at follow-up compared with medical therapy alone (adjusted hazard ratio 0.46, 95% CI 0.22-0.96; P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS SA IE represented approximately 25% of IE cases after TAVR and was associated with very high in-hospital and late mortality. The presence of some features determined a higher likelihood of SA IE and could help to orientate early antibiotic regimen selection. Surgery at index SA IE was associated with improved outcomes, and its role should be evaluated in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Del Val
- Québec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Québec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Mohamed Abdel-Wahab
- Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Heart Centre, Segeberger Kliniken, Bad Segeberg, Germany
| | - Norman Mangner
- Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Herzzentrum Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Eric Durand
- Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, U1096, CHU Rouen, Department of Cardiology, FHU CARNAVAL, F-76000 Rouen, France
| | | | | | | | - Francesco Giannini
- Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care and Research, Cotignola RA, Italy
| | - Tomasz Gasior
- Herzzentrum Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Martin Landt
- Heart Centre, Segeberger Kliniken, Bad Segeberg, Germany
| | - Vincent Auffret
- Univ Rennes, CHU Rennes, Inserm, LTSI - UMR1099, F 35000 Rennes, France
| | | | - Asim N Cheema
- St Michaels Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Southlake Hospital, Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
| | - Luis Nombela-Franco
- Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Howard C Herrmann
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Luca Testa
- IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Kim Won-Keun
- Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Centre, Bad Nauheim, Germany
| | | | - Alberto Alperi
- Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | | | - Antonio L Bartorelli
- Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "Luigi Sacco," University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Stefan Stortecky
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland (on behalf of Swiss TAVI)
| | | | | | - John Lisko
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Enrique Gutiérrez-Ibanes
- Instituto de Investigación Universitaria Gregorio Marañon, Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Luisa Salido
- Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Stamatios Lerakis
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | - Utz Kappert
- Herzzentrum Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Marco Barbanti
- AOU Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | | | - Frédéric Maes
- Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Antonio Miceli
- Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy; University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Susheel Kodali
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Henrique B Ribeiro
- InCor, Heart Institute, University of São Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil; Hospital Samaritano Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Alexandre Abizaid
- InCor, Heart Institute, University of São Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Helene Eltchaninoff
- Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, U1096, CHU Rouen, Department of Cardiology, FHU CARNAVAL, F-76000 Rouen, France
| | | | | | - Oliver Husser
- Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Munich, Germany; St-Johannes-Hospital, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Azeem Latib
- Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Montefiore Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Hervé Le Breton
- Univ Rennes, CHU Rennes, Inserm, LTSI - UMR1099, F 35000 Rennes, France
| | | | - Isaac Pascual
- Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | | | - Paolo Olivares
- Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "Luigi Sacco," University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - John G Webb
- St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Raj Makkar
- Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Marouane Boukhris
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Philippe Gervais
- Québec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Québec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Axel Linke
- Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Herzzentrum Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Lisa Crusius
- Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Herzzentrum Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - David Holzhey
- Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Josep Rodés-Cabau
- Québec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Québec City, Québec, Canada; Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|