Post-Intracranial Hemorrhage Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Risk of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage associated with NOACs compared with aspirin and warfarin: A long-term single hospital follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are currently the mainstay treatment for preventing thrombosis-induced ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), or previous infarction. However, such management may potentially induce antithrombotic-associated intracranial hemorrhage, leading to significantly adverse clinical outcomes. To investigate the risk of spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) in patients under therapeutic anticoagulation.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used a database established by Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital to estimate the risk of first onset sICH in patients with AF, DVT or previous stroke who were 18 years old or older, and who had been on at least three months continuous long-term treatment with the oral anticoagulants aspirin, warfarin, or NOACs. In addition, we used propensity-score matching to minimize bias and Cox proportional hazards ratio to compare the risk of sICH among patients prescribed these anticoagulants.

RESULTS

We analyzed the data of 546 patients (182 aspirin users, 182 warfarin users, and 182 NOAC users). 180 (20 taking aspirin, 74 warfarin, and 86 NOACs) developed new onset sICH before seven years. No new onset cases were found after 7 years. Importantly, those taking NOACs were found to be at a higher risk of early onset hemorrhage (47.80 %) compared to the groups taking aspirin (11.10 %) and warfarin (47.80 %) with a median time-to-occurrence being 2.50, 4.00, and 4.40 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Though NOACs prevented ischemic stroke, they were used with a higher risk of early onset spontaneous ICH at our large medical center.

Anticoagulation therapy in non-valvular atrial fibrillation after intracerebral hemorrhage: A propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND

The effect of antithrombotic therapy on patients with atrial fibrillation who sustained previous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remains uncertain. Data regarding antithrombotic therapy use in these patients are limited. This study aims to compare the clinical and overall outcomes of antithrombotic therapy and usual care in patients with atrial fibrillation who sustained ICH.

METHODS

We assembled consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation sustaining an ICH from our institution. Multivariable regression analysis and propensity-matched analysis were applied to assess associations of different antithrombotic therapies and outcomes. The primary outcome was mortality within the longest follow-up. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests of the time-to-event data were used to assess differences in survival.

RESULTS

In total, 296 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation who survived an ICH were included in this study. Our analysis demonstrated that antithrombotic therapy was associated with reduced mortality up to a 4-year duration of follow-up (OR, 0.49, 95 % CI 0.30-0.81). Similar results were obtained from the propensity-matched analysis (OR, 0.58, 95 % CI 0.34-0.98). Subgroup analysis showed that compared with usual care, direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) with or without antiplatelet was associated with a lower risk of long-term mortality (OR, 0.34, 95 % CI 0.17-0.69). In addition, our analysis observed a significant interaction between cardiac insufficiency and treatment effect (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with atrial fibrillation who have a history of ICH, administration of antithrombotic therapy, especially DOAC, was associated with lower mortality. Future randomized trials are warranted to test the positive net clinical benefit of DOAC therapy.

Evaluating thromboprophylaxis in the sickle cell disease population: Navigating the evidence gap

Sickle cell disease (SCD) arises from beta-globin gene mutations, with global estimates indicating around 500 000 affected neonates in 2021. In the United States, it is considered rare, impacting fewer than 200 000 individuals. The key pathogenic flaw lies in mutant haemoglobin S, prone to polymerization under low oxygen conditions, causing erythrocytes to adopt a sickled shape. This leads to complications like vascular occlusion, haemolytic anaemia, inflammation and organ damage. Beyond erythrocyte abnormalities however, there is a body of literature highlighting the hypercoagulable state that is likely a contributor to many of the complications we see in SCD. The persistent activation of the coagulation cascade results in thromboembolic events, notably venous thromboembolism (VTE) which is independently associated with increased mortality in both adults and children with SCD. While the increased risk of VTE in the SCD population seems well established, there is a lack of guidelines for thromboprophylaxis in this population. This Wider Perspective will describe the hypercoagulable state and increased thrombosis risk in the SCD population, as well as advocate for the development of evidence-based guidelines to aid in the prevention of VTE in SCD.

Reversal and resumption of anticoagulants in patients with anticoagulant-associated intracerebral hemorrhage

The use of anticoagulants has become more frequent due to the progressive aging population and increased thromboembolic events. Consequently, the proportion of anticoagulant-associated intracerebral hemorrhage (AAICH) in stroke patients is gradually increasing. Compared with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients without coagulopathy, patients with AAICH may have larger hematomas, worse prognoses, and higher mortality. Given the need for anticoagulant reversal and resumption, the management of AAICH differs from that of conventional medical or surgical treatments for ICH, and it is more specific. Understanding the pharmacology of anticoagulants and identifying agents that can reverse their effects in the early stages are crucial for treating life-threatening AAICH. When patients transition beyond the acute phase and their vital signs stabilize, it is important to consider resuming anticoagulants at the right time to prevent the occurrence of further thromboembolism. However, the timing and strategy for reversing and resuming anticoagulants are still in a dilemma. Herein, we summarize the important clinical studies, reviews, and related guidelines published in the past few years that focus on the reversal and resumption of anticoagulants in AAICH patients to help implement decisive diagnosis and treatment strategies in the clinical setting.

Impact of cerebral small vessel disease burden and drug level at admission on direct oral anticoagulant associated intracerebral hemorrhage

INTRODUCTION

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)-associated intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a catastrophic complication. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between computed tomography (CT)-based cerebrovascular small vessel disease (SVD) burden and DOAC-ICH as well as the DOAC concentration upon hospital admission and ICH outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included two cohorts: (1) DOAC-ICH: patients who suffered from DOAC-ICH and underwent drug level measurements upon admission; (2) DOAC-non-ICH: stable DOAC users who underwent head CT without ICH during treatment. We categorized the DOAC levels of the DOAC-ICH patients as low (<50 ng/mL), medium (50-300 ng/mL), and high (>300 ng/mL). The CT-based SVD burden (including white matter lesions [WML], lacunes, and cerebral atrophy) was evaluated, and SVD scores (range, 0-3) were used to evaluate SVD severity.

RESULTS

A total of 43 DOAC-ICH patients and 177 DOAC-non-ICH patients were enrolled. DOAC-ICH patients were more likely to have WML, lacunes, or cerebral atrophy compared to DOAC-non-ICH patients. After adjustment, the SVD burden was associated with DOAC-ICH, with a higher risk of more severe SVD (SVD score of 2; odds ratio [OR], 10.3 [3.17, 33.3]; score of 3; OR, 16.8 [4.50, 62.6]). The proportions of patients with high, medium, and low drug levels in the DOAC-ICH group were 16.3%, 55.8%, and 27.9%, respectively. Additionally, the high-level group displayed a larger hematoma size and had worse functional outcomes at 3 months than the other two groups.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The severity of SVD burden was associated with DOAC-ICH. Furthermore, high DOAC levels in ICH were associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes. To address the potential selection bias from these two cohorts, a prospective study to investigate the co-contribution of drug levels and SVD to DOAC-ICH is essential.

Effectiveness and Safety of Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Previous Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Current evidence regarding the clinical outcomes of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and previous stroke is inconclusive, especially in patients with previous intracranial haemorrhage (ICrH). We aim to undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the effectiveness and safety of NOACs versus warfarin in AF patients with a history of stroke.

METHODS

We searched studies published up to December 10, 2022, on PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies on adults with AF and previous ischaemic stroke (IS) or IrCH receiving either NOACs or warfarin and capturing outcome events (thromboembolic events, ICrH, and all-cause mortality) were eligible for inclusion.

RESULTS

Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (including 19,489 patients with previous IS) and fifteen observational studies (including 132,575 patients with previous IS and 13,068 patients with previous ICrH) were included. RCT data showed that compared with warfarin, NOACs were associated with a significant reduction in thromboembolic events (odds ratio [OR]: 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75-0.96), ICrH (OR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.36-0.90), and all-cause mortality (OR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.80-0.98). In analysing observational studies, similar results were retrieved. Moreover, patients with previous ICrH had a lower OR on thromboembolic events than those with IS (OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.46-0.95 vs. OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.70-0.93) in the comparison between NOACs and warfarin.

CONCLUSIONS

Observational data showed that in AF patients with previous stroke, NOACs showed better clinical performance compared to warfarin and the benefits of NOACs were more pronounced in patients with previous IrCH versus those with IS. RCT data also showed NOACs are superior to warfarin. However, current RCTs only included AF patients who survived an IS, and further large RCTs focused on patients with previous ICrH are warranted.

Multiple cerebral septic emboli sourcing from a ventricular assist device: a case report

Background

Patients carrying portable cardiac devices are at high risk of serious infections, such as endocarditis and sepsis. The event of a neurological complication should be taken into account, despite the fact that this group of patients is as a rule, strictly anticoagulated and monitored duly.

Case Description

We present the case of a patient of middle age with heart failure awaiting for organ transplantation, and meanwhile having a ventricular assist device (VAD) implanted. The suspicion of an infection was raised following a purulent drainage from the external lead of the device, as well as the clinical picture of malaise, fever and sweating. A right hemiparesis complicated the condition and the brain computerized tomography (CT) scan demonstrated the presence of several hemorrhagic lesions. The suspicion of septic emboli was proven following the result of hemoculture yielding Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Conclusions

The patient was treated with antibiotics, anti-seizure drugs and with supportive therapy, with good recovery of the clinical picture. He was transferred to a cardiac surgery facility for a revision, or eventually for a replacement of the VAD. There is clearly a need for an increased awareness of probable neurological events among patients holding external heart devices. Available guidelines for their follow-up and monitoring should be strictly respected, in order to avoid complications, and eventually install a prompt and adequate treatment.

Management of oral anticoagulant therapy after intracranial hemorrhage in patients with atrial fibrillation

Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is considered a potentially severe complication of oral anticoagulants (OACs) and antiplatelet therapy (APT). Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who survived ICH present both an increased ischemic and bleeding risk. Due to its lethality, initiating or reinitiating OACs in ICH survivors with AF is challenging. Since ICH recurrence may be life-threatening, patients who experience an ICH are often not treated with OACs, and thus remain at a higher risk of thromboembolic events. It is worthy of mention that subjects with a recent ICH and AF have been scarcely enrolled in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on ischemic stroke risk management in AF. Nevertheless, in observational studies, stroke incidence and mortality of patients with AF who survived ICH had been shown to be significantly reduced among those treated with OACs. However, the risk of hemorrhagic events, including recurrent ICH, was not necessarily increased, especially in patients with post-traumatic ICH. The optimal timing of anticoagulation initiation or restarting after an ICH in AF patients is also largely debated. Finally, the left atrial appendage occlusion option should be evaluated in AF patients with a very high risk of recurrent ICH. Overall, an interdisciplinary unit consisting of cardiologists, neurologists, neuroradiologists, neurosurgeons, patients, and their families should be involved in management decisions. According to available evidence, this review outlines the most appropriate anticoagulation strategies after an ICH that should be adopted to treat this neglected subset of patients.

Effect of antiplatelet therapy on the incidence, prognosis, and rebleeding of intracerebral hemorrhage

OBJECTIVE

Antiplatelet medications are increasingly being used for primary and secondary prevention of ischemic attacks owing to the increasing prevalence of ischemic stroke occurrences. Currently, many patients receive antiplatelet therapy (APT) to prevent thromboembolic events. However, long-term use of APT might also lead to an increased occurrence of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and affect the prognosis of patients with ICH. Furthermore, some research suggest that restarting APT for patients who have previously experienced ICH may result in rebleeding events. The precise relationship between APT and ICH remains unknown.

METHODS

We searched PubMed for the most recent related literature and summarized the findings from various studies. The search terms included "antiplatelet," "intracerebral hemorrhage," "cerebral microbleeds," "hematoma expansion," "recurrent," and "reinitiate." Clinical studies involving human subjects were ultimately included and interpreted in this review, and animal studies were not discussed.

RESULTS

When individuals are administered APT, the risk of thrombotic events should be weighted against the risk of bleeding. In general, for some patients' concomitant with risk factors of thrombotic events, the advantages of antiplatelet medication may outweigh the inherent risk of rebleeding. However, the use of antiplatelet medications for other patients with a higher risk of bleeding should be carefully evaluated and closely monitored. In the future, a quantifiable system for assessing thrombotic risk and bleeding risk will be necessary. After evaluation, the appropriate time to restart APT for ICH patients should be determined to prevent underlying ischemic stroke events. According to the present study results and expert experience, most patients now restart APT at around 1 week following the onset of ICH. Nevertheless, the precise time to restart APT should be chosen on a case-by-case basis as per the patient's risk of embolic events and recurrent bleeding. More compelling evidence-based medicine evidence is needed in the future.

CONCLUSION

This review thoroughly discusses the relationship between APT and the development of ICH, the impact of APT on the course and prognosis of ICH patients, and the factors influencing the decision to restart APT after ICH. However, different studies' conclusions are inconsistent due to the differences in quality control. To support future clinical decisions, more large-scale randomized controlled trials are required.

Efficacy and safety of anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation patients with intracranial hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: The benefits and risks of starting anticoagulation therapy, such as direct oral anticoagulations (DOACs) or warfarin, in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with a history of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) remain controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of starting oral anticoagulation (OAC) and non-oral anticoagulation in these patients.

Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched from inception to 01 May 2022 for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies, reporting effectiveness and safety outcomes for anticoagulation therapy in atrial fibrillation patients with intracranial hemorrhage. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the Cochrane Collaboration tool were used to evaluate bias risks for all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies. An effects model was applied to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies.

Results: We analyzed data from two randomized controlled trials (304 patients) and seven Cohort studies (17,477 patients). Compared to non-oral anticoagulation, starting oral anticoagulation therapy reduced the risk of Ischemic Stroke/Systemic Embolism (SE) (aHR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.55–0.57) and all-cause death (aHR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.35–0.80) in atrial fibrillation patients and a prior history intracranial hemorrhage. Starting oral anticoagulation therapy did not increase the risk of recurrent intracranial hemorrhage (aHR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.66–1.74), but increased the risk of major bleeding (aHR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.00–1.91) than no oral anticoagulation therapy. The DOACs had a lower risk of Ischemic Stroke/SE (aHR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.70–1.00), recurrent intracranial hemorrhage (aHR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.49–0.82), and all-cause death (aHR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.48–0.88) compared to warfarin. According to subgroup analyses, starting oral anticoagulation therapy have a higher risk of recurrent intracranial hemorrhage than non-oral anticoagulation therapy (aHR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.36–1.81) for Asians.

Conclusion: After intracranial hemorrhage in atrial fibrillation patients, restarting or initiating oral anticoagulation therapy decreased the risk of Ischemic Stroke/SE and all-cause death but did not increase the risk for recurrent intracranial hemorrhage. Direct oral anticoagulations have better efficacy and safety than warfarin if oral anticoagulation therapy is started. However, starting oral anticoagulation increases the risk for recurrent intracranial hemorrhage in the Asian region.

Survival benefits of oral anticoagulation therapy in acute kidney injury patients with atrial fibrillation: a retrospective study from the MIMIC-IV database

OBJECTIVE

To find out the effect of different oral anticoagulation therapies (OAC) on mortality rate in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) and atrial fibrillation (AF).DesignA retrospective study.

SETTING

This study was conducted in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 19 672 patients diagnosed with AKI.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients were categorised into three groups: (1) AF; (2) AKI and AF, OAC-; (3) AKI and AF, OAC+. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints were the length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital. Propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox proportional hazards model adjusted confounding factors. Linear regression was applied to assess the associations between OAC treatment and LOS.

RESULTS

After PSM, 2042 pairs of AKI and AF patients were matched between the patients who received OAC and those without anticoagulant treatment. Cox regression analysis showed that, OAC significantly reduce 30-day mortality compared with non-OAC (HR 0.30; 95% CI 0.25 to 0.35; p<0.001). Linear regression analysis revealed that OAC prolong LOS in hospital (11.3 days vs 10.0 days; p=0.013) and ICU (4.9 days vs 4.4 days; p<0.001). OAC did not improve survival in patients with haemorrhage (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.34 to 1.29; p=0.23). Novel OAC did not reduce mortality in acute-on-chronic renal injury (HR 2.03; 95% CI 1.09 to 3.78; p=0.025) patients compared with warfarin.

CONCLUSION

OAC administration was associated with improved short-term survival in AKI patients concomitant with AF.

Meta-Analysis of Oral Anticoagulants and Adverse Outcomes in Atrial Fibrillation Patients After Intracranial Hemorrhage

Background

Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is excluded in most anticoagulation randomized clinical trials (RCTs), so oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy is still the conventional treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) after ICH. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to determine the effectiveness and safety outcomes of OAC for these patients.

Methods

We systematically searched the PubMed and Embase databases up to March 2022 for RCTs and observational studies exploring the effect of OAC in patients with AF after ICH. The effectiveness outcomes included stroke or systemic embolism, ischemic stroke, and all-cause death, whereas the safety outcomes were major bleeding and recurrent ICH. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from each study were pooled using a random-effects model.

Results

A total of 14 studies were included. The OAC therapy that was performed reduced the risks of stroke or systemic embolism (HR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.53-0.81), ischemic stroke (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.60-0.82), and all-cause death (HR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.27-0.70) but had a higher risk of major bleeding (HR = 1.50, 95% CI 0.94-2.40) and showed no difference in recurrent ICH (HR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.53-1.55) compared to the no OAC therapy. With the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) therapy, a lower risk of stroke or systemic embolism (HR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.98), all-cause death (HR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.53-0.84), and recurrent ICH (HR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.54-0.86) was observed against the use of vitamin K antagonists (VKA) therapy.

Conclusion

The OAC therapy (especially VKA) revealed superior effectiveness in patients with AF after ICH, and the superiority of NOAC was also found, but some related evidence was limited.