Cerebral Microembolism During Coronary Angiography

Clinical and subclinical microemboli following neuroangiography in children

BACKGROUND

To assess the frequency, imaging appearances, and risk factors of brain microemboli following pediatric neuroangiography, as assessed by early diffusion-weighted MRI imaging (DWI).

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective analysis investigated early DWI post-pediatric neuroangiography. Patients aged 0-18 years who had diagnostic neuroangiography and DWI within a week postprocedure were included. Data on clinical and procedural parameters and MRI findings were recorded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on the following risk factors: age, weight, vasculopathy, antiplatelet drug use, access type, intraprocedural heparin, procedure duration, neck arteries catheterized, and angiographic runs. A p-value<0.05 indicated statistical significance.

RESULTS

Eighty-two children were included (40.2% female), mean age 10.1±4.5 years (range: 7 months-17 years). There were no intraprocedural thromboembolic complications recognized. DWI positivity was seen following 3.6% (3/82) procedures: two with transient symptoms, and one instance of silent microemboli. There were no territorial infarcts or clinical stroke. Children with underlying vasculopathy had a higher risk of microemboli from angiography than children without vasculopathy (OR 31.6, p=0.02), and the OR of microemboli following transradial angiography was 79.1 (p=0.005) as compared with transfemoral angiography. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed a significant association between microemboli and number of angiographic runs (p=0.004). Follow-up MRI in all three patients showed no residual abnormal signal.

CONCLUSIONS

Cerebral microemboli are unusual following uncomplicated neuroangiography in children. However, in the presence of underlying vasculopathy and with transradial technique, the incidence approaches that reported in the adult literature. An increased association with the number of angiographic runs is an important and controllable factor.

Internuclear ophthalmoplegia following radial artery cardiac catheterization approach: An unusual presentation

Internuclear ophthalmoplegia (INO) may happen following percutaneous coronary intervention and angiography. However, no reports of INO during radial artery angioplasty were reported yet. We report a rare case in a 47-year-old man presenting with diplopia after radial artery angioplasty. Although the symptoms were resolved after 60 days, diagnosing this obstacle is necessary to reduce the patient and physician's anxiety.

Prognostic Significance of Asymptomatic Cerebral Infarction in Patients After Cardiac Catheterization

Recent studies have showed that asymptomatic cerebral infarction (ACI) developed in a reasonable number of patients after cardiac catheterization. However, no study has investigated the long-term prognostic impact of ACI after cardiac catheterization. We investigated whether ACI after cardiac catheterization affects long-term mortality and subsequent cardiovascular events.We retrospectively enrolled patients who underwent cardiac catheterization before cardiac surgery and cerebral diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI). The incidence and clinical features of ACI were investigated. The long-term prognosis, including all-cause mortality and subsequent major cardiovascular events (MACE; all-cause mortality, stroke, acute myocardial infarction, fatal arrhythmia, and hospitalized heart failure), was also assessed.A total of 203 patients were enrolled. Of these, 10.3% had ACI diagnosed by DWI. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between patients with and without ACI, except more frequent history of symptomatic stroke in patients with ACI. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis during a median follow-up of 1009 days, the patients with ACI showed worse mortality and a slightly higher occurrence of MACE compared with those without ACI (P = 0.01 and P = 0.08, respectively). In addition, ACI was a prognostic marker independent of age, surgery type, and history of stroke.ACI after cardiac catheterization frequently developed and was also associated with long-term prognosis. It may be an independent prognostic marker in high-risk patients who underwent subsequent cardiac surgery.

Transradial Versus Transfemoral Intraoperative Cerebral Angiography for Open Cerebrovascular Surgery: Effectiveness, Safety, and Learning Curve

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative cerebral angiography (IOA) is a valuable adjunct in open and hybrid cerebrovascular surgery. Commonly, transfemoral access (TFA) is used. Lately, transradial access (TRA) has gained popularity for neurointervention. However, the TRA has not yet been compared with the TFA for IOA.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness and safety of the TRA and TFA for IOA. In addition, the learning curve for implementing the TRA for IOA was evaluated.

METHODS

Between July 2020 and 2022, 92/1787 diagnostic cerebral angiographies met inclusion criteria for IOA. Sheath run time to primary target vessel run time (STT), amount of contrast dye (CD), fluoroscopy time (FT), and dose-area products (DAPs) were compared between TRA and TFA, different aortic arch types, and both study years.

RESULTS

One case required transitioning from TRA to TFA (1/26, 3.8%) because of a minute proximal radial vasculature. The STT, CD, FT, and DAP were similar for the TRA (n = 25) and the TFA groups (n = 67) (p = ns). One groin hematoma (1.5%) was observed in the TFA group. No other complications or any change in modified Rankin Scale were observed. Aortic arch type II/III was associated with longer STT ( P = .032) but not CD, FT, or DAP. There was a nonsignificant decline of STTs among the TRA cases ( P = .104) but stable STTs among TFA cases ( P = .775).

CONCLUSION

The TRA and TFA represent equally effective and safe routes for IOA. In addition, expertise with the TRA can rapidly be gained and facilitates tailoring the access for IOA to patient's individual anatomy and surgeon's needs.

Adverse Impact of Peri-Procedural Stroke in Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Peri-procedural stroke (PPS) is an important complication in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The extent to which PPS impacts mortality and outcomes remains to be defined. Consecutive patients who underwent PCI enrolled in the Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry (2014 to 2018) were categorized into PPS and no PPS groups. The primary outcome was 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (composite of mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and unplanned revascularization). Of 50,300 patients, PPS occurred in 0.26% patients (n = 133) (71% ischemic, and 29% hemorrhagic etiology). Patients who developed PPS were older (69 vs 66 years) compared with patients with no PPS, and more likely to have pre-existing heart failure (59% vs 29%), chronic kidney disease (33% vs 20%), and previous cerebrovascular disease (13% vs 3.6%), p <0.01. Among those with PPS, there was a higher frequency of presentation with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (49% vs 18%) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (14% vs 2.2%), PCI by way of femoral access (59% vs 46%), and adjunctive thrombus aspiration (12% vs 3.6%), all p = <0.001. PPS was associated with incident 30-day MACE (odds ratio [OR] 2.97, 95% confidence intervals [CIs] 1.86 to 4.74, p <0.001) after multivariable adjustment. Utilizing inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis, PPS remained predictive of 30-day MACE (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.31 to 2.80, p = 0.001) driven by higher 30-day mortality (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.35 to 2.96, p = 0.001). In conclusion, in this large, multi-center registry, the incidence of PPS was low; however, its clinical sequelae were significant, with a twofold increased risk of 30-day MACE and all-cause death.

Characteristics of headache during and/or after coronary intervention: A prospective observational study

INTRODUCTION

Headache during and/or after coronary intervention is common but has received little attention from cardiologists and neurologists. The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence, risk factors, and possible mechanism of coronary intervention-related headache.

METHODS

Using a prospective observational design, we identified consecutive patients with coronary intervention from May 2020 to August 2020. Patients were followed up with questionnaires immediately after coronary intervention and 24 h, 72 h, 1 week and 2 weeks after the intervention.

RESULTS

In total, 94 patients were enrolled, and 71 patients ultimately completed the 2-week follow-up. Among 71 patients, headache developed during and/or after coronary intervention in 18 (25.4%) patients. Two different types of headache related to coronary intervention were observed: One during and another after coronary intervention. Headache characteristics are described in detail. A history of previous headache was an independent risk factor for coronary intervention-related headache (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary intervention-related headache has an incidence of 25.4%, and previous headache history was an independent risk factor. Moreover, considering that there are no relevant diagnostic criteria, it is suggested that the definition of coronary intervention-related headache should be established in the International Classification of Headache Disorders.

Long-Term Outcomes of Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack after Non-Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

OBJECTIVES

Non-emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has lower risk of stroke than emergency PCI. With increasing elective PCI and increasing risk of stroke after PCI, risk factors for stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) in non-emergency PCI and long-term outcomes needs to be better characterised. We aim to identify risk factors for cerebrovascular accidents in patients undergoing non-emergency PCI and long-term outcomes after stroke or TIA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed on 1724 consecutive patients who underwent non-emergency PCI for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), unstable and stable angina. The primary outcomes measured were stroke or TIA, myocardial infarction (MI) and all-cause death.

RESULTS

Upon mean follow-up of 3.71 (SD 0.97) years, 70 (4.1%) had subsequent ischaemic stroke or TIA, and they were more likely to present with NSTEMI (50 [71.4%] vs 892 [54.0%], OR 2.13 [1.26-3.62], p = 0.004) and not stable angina (19 [27.1%] vs 648 [39.2%], OR 0.58 [0.34-0.99]). Femoral access was associated with subsequent stroke or TIA compared to radial access (OR 2.10 [1.30-3.39], p < 0.002). Previous stroke/TIA was associated with subsequent stroke/TIA (p < 0.001), death (p < 0.001) and MI (p = 0.002). Furthermore, subsequent stroke/TIA was significantly associated with subsequent MI (p = 0.006), congestive cardiac failure (CCF) (p = 0.008) and death (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing non-emergency PCI, previous stroke/TIA predicted post-PCI ischaemic stroke/TIA, which was associated with death, MI, CCF.

Periprocedural Stroke After Coronary Revascularization (from the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-3)

There is a scarcity of data on incidence, risk factors, especially clinical severity, and long-term prognostic impact of periprocedural stroke after coronary revascularization in contemporary real-world practice. Among 14,867 consecutive patients undergoing first coronary revascularization between January 2011 and December 2013 (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]: N = 13258, and coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG]: N = 1609) in the Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto PCI/CABG registry Cohort-3, we evaluated the details on periprocedural stroke. Periprocedural stroke was defined as stroke within 30 days after the index procedure. Incidence of periprocedural stroke was 0.96% after PCI and 2.13% after CABG (log-rank p <0.001). Proportions of major stroke defined by modified Rankin Scale ≥2 at hospital discharge were 68% after PCI, and 77% after CABG. Independent risk factors of periprocedural stroke were acute coronary syndrome (ACS), carotid artery disease, advanced age, heart failure, and end-stage renal disease after PCI, whereas they were ACS, carotid artery disease, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, malignancy, and frailty after CABG. There was excess long-term mortality risk of patients with periprocedural stroke relative to those without after both PCI and CABG (hazard ratio 1.71 [1.25 to 2.33], and hazard ratio 4.55 [2.79 to 7.43]). In conclusion, incidence of periprocedural stroke was not negligible not only after CABG, but also after PCI in contemporary real-world practice. Majority of patients with periprocedural stroke had at least mild disability at hospital discharge. ACS and carotid artery disease were independent strong risk factors of periprocedural stroke after both PCI and CABG. Periprocedural stroke was associated with significant long-term mortality risk after both PCI and CABG.

Transradial artery access for percutaneous cardiovascular procedures: state of the art and future directions

The transradial access (TRA) for cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been widely adopted in the last decades since its first description in the late 40s. The transradial approach has been associated with favorable outcomes as compared with transfemoral access (TFA) in several registries and randomized clinical trials, mainly due to the lower incidence of access-site bleedings, vascular complications and improved patient comfort. This review aimed to summarize the body of evidence supporting the use of TRA, to discuss clinical implications, possible technical limitations and future directions, such as the implementation of TRA as the primary access for complex procedures and structural interventions.

Predictors and Clinical Outcomes of Crossover From Radial to Femoral Access During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Access site complications are more common with femoral access (FA) than radial access (RA). However, due to the higher rate of failure and crossover, door-to-balloon time (DBT) is prolonged by RA. Records of 3600 patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) between January 2016 and June 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 130 patients with crossover from RA to FA were identified and compared with the data of 501 patients who underwent pPCI with successful RA during 2018. Regression analysis was performed to determine the predictors of crossover. Crossover to the femoral approach occurred in 5.9% of our cases. Mean DBT was 17 minutes longer in the crossover group (61 ± 72 minutes vs 78 ± 79 minutes, P = .026). Female sex (odds ratio [OR]: 1.8; 95% CI, 0.99-3.46, P = .046) and anterior myocardial infarction (AntMI; OR: 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33-0.88, P = .007) were independent predictors of crossover. In-hospital mortality rates were significantly higher in the crossover group than in the radial success group (5.4% vs 1.8%, P = .020). Crossover to FA due to radial failure is associated with delayed DBT and increased rate of in-hospital mortality. Female sex and AntMI were primary predictors of crossover.

Cerebral Infarcts After Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Prospective Propensity-Score-Adjusted Comparison of Right Radial, Left Radial, and Femoral Approaches

BACKGROUND

New cerebral infarcts (CIs) detected at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are reported after cardiac procedures. Clinical and procedural aspects are implicated as potential causal factors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of new CIs after coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention according to the arterial access site.

METHODS

180 patients undergoing elective coronary angiography were studied with cerebral MRI the day before and the day after the procedure. Unadjusted and propensity score (PS) analyses were performed comparing the occurrence of CIs in right radial (RR), left radial (LR) and transfemoral (TF) access groups.

RESULTS

New CIs were observed in 14 patients (7.8% of the total sample, one with neurological sequelae). CIs were detected in 15.5% vs 4.9% vs 3.3% of RR, LR and TF groups, respectively (p = .026). In PS adjusted analyses, the RR approach was associated with more CIs compared with the TF approach (odds ratio [OR] estimate from logistic regression adjusted by PS quartiles: 0.158; 95% confidence interval: 0.031 to 0.814; p = .027) and the LR approach (OR: 0.266; 95% confidence interval: 0.066 to 1.080; p = .064). In a secondary analysis, a comparison of RR vs non-RR approach (TF + LR) was performed, showing that post-procedural CIs were more frequent in the RR group (OR: 0.170; 95% confidence interval: 0.050 to 0.574; p = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that the RR approach may be associated with a higher rate of new CIs after coronary angiography compared with LR and TF approaches.

Stroke After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Era of Transradial Intervention

BACKGROUND

Periprocedural stroke is a rare but life-threatening complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Transradial intervention (TRI) is more beneficial than transfemoral intervention for periprocedural bleeding and acute kidney injuries, but its effect on periprocedural stroke has not been fully investigated. Our study aimed to assess risk predictors of periprocedural stroke according to PCI access site.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between 2008 and 2016, 17 966 patients undergoing PCI were registered in a prospective multicenter database. Periprocedural stroke was defined as loss of neurological function caused by an ischemic or hemorrhagic event with residual symptoms lasting at least 24 hours after onset. Periprocedural stroke was observed in 42 patients (0.3%). Stroke patients were older and had a higher incidence of chronic kidney disease, peripheral artery disease, and acute coronary syndrome but were less likely to undergo TRI. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed TRI (odds ratio; 0.33; 95% CI, 0.16-0.71; P=0.004) was significantly associated with a lower occurrence of periprocedural stroke. Finally, propensity score-matching analysis showed that TRI was associated with a reduced risk of periprocedural stroke compared with transfemoral intervention (0.1% versus 0.4%; P=0.014). According to our sensitivity analysis, this finding was robust to the presence of an unmeasured confounder in almost all plausible scenarios.

CONCLUSIONS

TRI was associated with a reduced risk of periprocedural stroke compared with transfemoral intervention. Increased TRI use may reduce overall PCI complications and should be recommended as the optimal access site for both urgent/emergent and elective PCIs.

An Update on Radial Artery Access and Best Practices for Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Transradial artery access for percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with lower bleeding and vascular complications than transfemoral artery access, especially in patients with acute coronary syndromes. A growing body of evidence supports adoption of transradial artery access to improve acute coronary syndrome-related outcomes, to improve healthcare quality, and to reduce cost. The purpose of this scientific statement is to propose and support a "radial-first" strategy in the United States for patients with acute coronary syndromes. This document also provides an update to previously published statements on transradial artery access technique and best practices, particularly as they relate to the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Contemporary trends in stroke complicating cardiac catheterisation

BACKGROUND

Stroke remains an important complication of diagnostic cardiac catheterisation and percutaneous coronary intervention and is associated with high rates of in-hospital mortality.

AIMS

To evaluate the incidence of stroke over a 10-year period and assess the long-term influence of stroke following cardiac catheterisation and PCI on functional outcomes, based on modified Rankin score and mortality.

METHODS

The study was performed using a case-control design in a single tertiary referral centre. Patients were identified by correlating those patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation between October 2006 and December 2016 with patients who underwent neuroimaging within 7 days to identify possible cases of suspected stroke or transient ischaemic attack.

RESULTS

A total of 21 510 patients underwent cardiac catheterisation during the study period. Sixty (0.28%) patients experienced stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Compared to control patients, those who did experience cerebral ischaemic events were older (70.5 vs 64 years; P < 0.001), with higher rates of atrial fibrillation, hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Stroke complicating cardiac catheterisation was associated with an increased risk of readmission, with a significantly higher hazard of readmission for stroke noted. Despite minimal functional impairment based on modified Rankin score, stroke was associated with a significant risk of early and cumulative mortality. Stroke incidence remained stable over the study period despite changes in procedural practice.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence and functional severity of stroke remains low despite evolving procedural practice with a stable incidence over time despite changes in procedural practice; however, post-procedural stroke confirms an increased mortality hazard.

Comparison of Frequency of Silent Cerebral Infarction After Coronary Angiography and Stenting With Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approaches

Silent cerebral infarction (SCI) can be seen after coronary procedures. We investigated whether vascular access sites have an impact on the risk of SCI. A total of 255 consecutive patients who underwent diagnostic or interventional coronary procedures through transfemoral (n = 126 patients) or transradial (n = 129 patients) approach were evaluated. Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) levels were studied before and 12 hours after the procedure. Elevation of greater than 12 ng/ml was considered as SCI. Patients were mainly men (60%) with a mean age of 62 years. SCI was observed in 74 of 255 patients (29%). It was significantly more prevalent among transradial group. Elevation of NSE was observed in 36% of transradial group (n = 47) and 21% of the transfemoral group (n = 27) (p = 0.008). Patients with SCI were more likely to have male sexuality, hyperlipidemia, history of smoking, and previous myocardial infarction. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that patients who underwent coronary procedures through transradial approach were 2.1 times more likely to have an SCI than patients with transfemoral approach (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.205 to 3.666; p = 0.008). Other independent predictors of NSE elevation were previous myocardial infarction (odds ratio 8.6; 95% CI 4.209 to 17.572; p <0.001) and smoking history (odds ratio 7.251; 95% CI 3.855 to 13.639; p <0.001). The present study suggests that transradial coronary procedures carry higher risk of SCI when compared with transfemoral route.

Feasibility of Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention via Left Snuffbox Approach

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Feasibility of coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) via left snuffbox approach is still concerned. We aimed to investigate efficacy and safety of the left snuffbox approach for CAG and PCI.

METHODS

Left snuffbox approach was tried in 150 patients who planned to perform CAG or PCI for suspected myocardial ischemia between 1 November 2017 and 31 March 2018.

RESULTS

Success rate of radial artery (RA) cannulation via snuffbox approach was 88.0% (n=132). Among 132 individuals, 58 (43.9%) acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients were included. The diameter of snuffbox RA was significantly smaller than conventional RA (2.57 mm vs. 2.72 mm, p<0.001) from quantitative computed angiography of 101 patients. However, CAG via snuffbox approach by 6 French sheath was successfully performed in all 132 patients. In addition, there was significant correlation between the snuffbox and conventional RA diameter (r=0.856, p<0.001). In 42 PCI cases, including 25 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the success rate of PCI via snuffbox approach was 97.6% (n=41). Intravascular imaging-guided PCI was performed in 8 (19.5%) patients and multi-vessel PCI in 4 (9.8%) cases. Regarding vascular complication, forearm swelling with bruising, not requiring surgery or transfusion, occurred in 2 (4.9%) PCI cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Left snuffbox approach is suitable for CAG and PCI compared with the conventional radial approach.

Invention of the Guide Catheter Irrigation Monitoring Device for Neuroendovascular Therapy

Objective

The thromboembolic events during neuroendovascular therapy (NET) are the major complications of concern that can be occasionally fatal. The thrombotic occlusion of the guide catheter for NET is thought to be the risk of the thromboembolic events. We have developed an idea for inventing the monitoring system of the continuous irrigation through the guide catheter. We herein present a unique invention of the guide catheter irrigation monitoring device.

Methods

We have developed ideas for preventing the thrombotic occlusion of the guide catheter. In order to design a convenient device working in the practical use, we have consulted and shared the ideas with the electrical engineers about putting the invention.

Results

The guide catheter irrigation monitoring device (GCIMD) consisted of three parts of optical sensor, main body and electric adapter. In brief, the basic principles of working of the GCIMD are as follows. The optical sensor is attached to the dripping chamber of the line to irrigation solution. The main body had the small light and speaker to make an alarm sounds. The sensor monitors the dripping of flush solution. If the dripping stops more than three seconds, a warning alarm has been activated. So, the operating physicians can concentrate and check the guide catheter irrigation. After the use of the GCIMD, there was no major thromboembolic complication in conjunction with the thrombotic occlusion of the guide catheter in our institute.

Conclusion

We have developed a brilliant invention of the GCIMD for NET.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between the Right and Left Radial Artery Approaches from the Korean Transradial Coronary Intervention Registry

PURPOSE

Transradial intervention (TRI) shows anatomical and technical differences between the right radial approach (RRA) and left radial approach (LRA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety using LRA, compared with RRA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 1653 consecutive patients who underwent TRI from November 2004 to October 2010 were enrolled in the Korean multicenter TRI registry. The patients were divided into two groups: the RRA group (n=792 patients) and the LRA group (n=861 patients). To adjust for any potential confounders, propensity score matched (PSM) analysis was performed (C-statistic: 0.726). After PSM, a total of 1100 patients were enrolled for analysis.

RESULTS

After PSM, the RRA group exhibited a larger contrast volume (259.3±119.6 mL vs. 227.0±90.7 mL, p<0.001), a longer fluoroscopic time (22.5±28.0 minutes vs. 17.1±12.6 minutes) and higher access site change (12.3% vs. 1.0%, p<0.001) than the LRA group. Meanwhile, the LRA group showed a shorter procedure time (49.2±30.4 minutes vs. 55.4±28.7 minutes, p=0.003) than the RRA group. After PSM, in-hospital complications and 12-month cumulative clinical outcomes were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Of the two TRI methods, LRA was associated with better procedural efficacy, including shorter procedural time, smaller contrast volume, and less access site change than RRA. However, both methods showed similar 12-month cumulative clinical outcomes. Therefore, LRA was deemed superior to RRA in terms of procedural feasibility without a significant difference in clinical outcomes.

Does Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Affect Cognitive Function?

Cerebral microemboli are frequently observed during coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and their numbers have been related to the vascular access site used. Although cerebral microemboli can cause silent cerebral lesions, their clinical impact is debated. To study this, 93 patients referred for CA or PCI underwent serial cognitive testing using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test to detect postprocedural cognitive impairment. Patients were randomized to radial or femoral access. In a subgroup of 35 patients, the number of cerebral microemboli was monitored with transcranial Doppler technique. We found the median precatheterization result of the MoCA test to be 27, and it did not change significantly 4 and 31 days, respectively, after the procedure. There was no significant correlation between the number of cerebral microemboli and the difference between preprocedural and postprocedural MoCA tests. The test results did not differ between vascular access sites. One-third of the patients had a precatheterization median MoCA test result <26 corresponding to mild cognitive impairment. In conclusion, using the MoCA test, we could not detect any cognitive impairment after CA or PCI, and no significant correlations were found between the results of the MoCA test and cerebral microemboli or vascular access site, respectively. In patients with suspected coronary heart disease, mild cognitive impairment was common.

Influence of access site choice for cardiac catheterization on risk of adverse neurological events: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Stroke is a rare but potentially catastrophic complication of cardiac catheterization. Although some procedural aspects are known to influence stroke risk, the impact of radial versus femoral access site use is unclear. Early observational studies and limited randomized trial data suggested more frequent embolic events with radial access. Subsequently, larger pooled analyses have shown no clear differences in stroke risk but were limited by low event rates. Recent publication of relevant new data prompted our reevaluation of this concern. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate stroke complicating cardiac catheterization with use of transradial versus transfemoral access.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was undertaken using OVID SP with appropriate search terms. RevMan 5.3.5 was used to conduct a random-effects meta-analysis using the inverse variance method for pooling risk ratios (RRs) or the Mantel-Haenszel method for pooling dichotomous data. Pooled data from >24,000 patients in randomized controlled trials and >475,000 patients from observational studies were used. The risk ratio (RR) for (any) stroke, using randomized controlled trial data, was not significant (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.58-1.29). Using observational data, a significant difference favoring radial access was seen (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.52-0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

Radial access site utilization for cardiac catheterization is not associated with an increased risk of stroke events. These data provide reassurance and should remove another potential barrier to conversion to a "default" radial practice among those who are currently predominantly femoral operators.

Insufficient platelet inhibition and thromboembolic complications in patients with intracranial aneurysms after stent placement

OBJECT

Insufficient platelet inhibition has been associated with an increased incidence of thromboembolic complications in cardiology patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Data regarding the relationship between insufficient platelet inhibition and thromboembolic complications in patients undergoing neurovascular procedures remain controversial. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship of insufficient platelet inhibition and thromboembolic complications in patients with intracranial aneurysm undergoing stent treatment.

METHODS

The authors prospectively recruited patients with intracranial aneurysms undergoing stent treatment and maintained the data in a database. MRI with diffusion-weighted sequences was performed within 24 hours of stent insertion to identify acute ischemic lesions. The authors used thromboelastography to assess the degree of platelet inhibition in response to clopidogrel and aspirin. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify potential risk factors of thromboembolic complications.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-eight patients with 193 aneurysms were enrolled in this study. Ninety-one of 168 (54.2%) patients with acute cerebral ischemic lesions were identified by diffusion-weighted MRI. In 9 (5.4%) patients with ischemic lesions, transient ischemic attack or stroke was found at discharge, and these complications were found in 11 (6.5%) patients during the follow-up period. The incidence of periprocedural thromboembolic complications increased with resistance to antiplatelet agents, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, complete occlusion, and aneurysm of the anterior circulation. The multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that the anterior circulation and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) inhibition percentage were independent risk factors of perioperative thromboembolic complications. The maximum amplitude and ADP inhibition percentage were independent risk factors for thromboembolic complications during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

The ADP inhibition percentage is related to thromboembolic complications after stent placement for intracranial aneurysms. The increase of the ADP inhibition may decrease the risk of thromboembolic complications.

From Femoral to Radial Approach in Coronary Intervention

Since the first cardiac catheterization in 1929, this procedure has evolved considerably. Historically performed via the transfemoral access, in the last years, the transradial access has been spreading gradually due to its many advantages. We have conducted a review of published literature concerning efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness, and we analyzed our patients' data, including the results of the recently published Minimizing Adverse hemorrhagic events by TRansradial access site and systemic implementation of angioX (MATRIX) study. This review confirmed the superiority of the transradial access compared to the femoral access, especially regarding complications related to the access site, duration of hospitalization, and comfort for the patient. The transradial approach is an excellent option for coronary angiography, and the procedure's risks are reduced by increased operator experience.

Safety and Feasibility of Transradial Access for Visceral Interventions in Patients with Thrombocytopenia

PURPOSE

Transradial access (TRA) has shown lower morbidity and decreased bleeding complications compared to transfemoral access. This study evaluates the safety and feasibility of TRA in thrombocytopenic patients undergoing visceral interventions.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients who underwent visceral interventions via the radial artery with platelet count less than or equal to 50,000/µL were included in the study. Outcome variables included technical success, access site, bleeding, transfusion, and neurological complications.

RESULTS

From July 1, 2012, to May 31, 2015, a total of 1353 peripheral interventions via TRA were performed, of which 85 procedures were performed in 64 patients (mean age 62.2 years) with a platelet count <50,000/µL (median 39,000/µL). Interventions included chemoembolization (n = 46), selective internal radiation therapy (n = 30), and visceral embolization (n = 9). Technical success was 97.6% with two cases of severe vessel spasm requiring ipsilateral femoral crossover. There was no major access site, bleeding, or neurological adverse events at 30 days. Minor access site hematomas occurred in five cases (5.9%) and were treated conservatively in all cases. Pre-procedural platelet transfusions were administered in 23 (27.1%) cases. There was no statistically significant difference in access site or bleeding complications between the transfused and nontransfused groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Transradial visceral interventions in patients with thrombocytopenia are both feasible and safe, possibly without the need for platelet transfusions.

Radial access during percutaneous interventions in patients with acute coronary syndromes: should we routinely monitor radial artery patency by ultrasonography promptly after the procedure and in long-term observation?

Access-site vascular complications in patients undergoing transradial coronary procedures are rare but may have relevant clinical consequences. The aim of the study was to evaluate: (1) radial artery's (RA) patency immediately after the procedure and in long-term observation, (2) factors influencing the frequency of radial artery's occlusion (RAO) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures performed via transradial access in the group of 220 patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). RA ultrasound was performed 48-72 h after the procedure and in those who were diagnosed with RAO-again after 6-12 months. According to the ultrasonographic findings, the patients were divided into two sub-groups: 187 pts (85 %) with patent RA after PCI and 33 pts (15 %) with RAO. Both sub-groups significantly statistically differed with regard to the frequency of local hematomas-15 versus 27.3 % (p = 0.02), the frequency of applying IIbIIIa inhibitors in PCI-6.4 versus 15.1 % (p = 0.015) and procedure duration-0.59 ± 0.37 versus 0.77 ± 0.38 (p = 0.014), respectively. In a multifactorial analysis the only factor influencing RA patency promptly after the procedure was PCI duration (p < 0.05, r = -0.22). In the follow-up, right RA remained still obstructed in 28 patients (12.7 %) whereas in five patients (2.3 %) the regular flow in RA was resumed. The chronic RAO was clinically silent. Due to insignificant frequency of the occurrence of RAO after PCI procedure in patients with ACS as well as practically lack of clinical consequences of this artery's occlusion in long-term observation, we do not see any implications to routine ultrasound periprocedural RA evaluation.

Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the safety and efficacy of radial access compared with femoral access for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

BACKGROUND

Numerous randomized controlled trials, including several new studies, have compared outcomes of these approaches in the context of primary PCI for STEMI patients with inconclusive results.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare outcomes in STEMI patients undergoing radial versus femoral access for primary PCI. Primary outcomes were death and major bleeding evaluated at the longest available follow-up. Secondary outcomes included access site bleeding, stroke, and procedure time. Twelve studies (N = 5,055) were included. All trials were conducted in centers experienced with both approaches.

RESULTS

Compared with femoral approach, radial approach was associated with decreased risk of mortality (2.7% vs. 4.7%; odds ratio [OR]: 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40 to 0.76; p < 0.001) and decreased risk of major bleeding (1.4% vs. 2.9%; OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.85; p = 0.01). Radial access was also associated with reduction in relative risk of access site bleeding (2.1% vs. 5.6%; OR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.50; p < 0.001). Stroke risk was similar between both approaches (0.5% vs. 0.5%; OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.45 to 2.54; p = 0.87). The procedure time was slightly longer in the radial group than in the femoral group (mean difference: 1.52 min; 95% CI: 0.33 to 2.70, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, the radial approach is associated with favorable outcomes and should be the preferred approach for experienced radial operators.

Silent Cerebral Events after Atrial Fibrillation Ablation - Overview and Current Data

Silent cerebral lesions (SCL) have been identified on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in apparently asymptomatic patients after cardiovascular procedures. After atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation incidences range from 1 to over 40% depending upon different factors. MRI definition should include diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) to detect hyperintensities (bright spots) due to acute brain ischemia correlated with a hypointensity in the apparent diffusion coefficient mapping (ADC-map) to rule out artifacts. The genesis of SCL appears to be multifactorial and appears to be a result of embolic events either from gaseous or solid particles. The MRI pattern appears to be comparable not hinting towards a specific mechanism. One may distinguish two different MRI definition: one, more sensitive, for silent ischemic events (SCE) not proven to be related to cell death (DWI positive but FLAIR negative); and one for SCL that are due to edema caused by cell death which will lead to glial cell scar formation (DWI positive and FLAIR positive). For ease of data interpretation, future studies should ensure both definitions, and that DWI and FLAIR data is acquired using identical slice thickness and orientation. Risk factors associated with increased SCL-incidences involve patient-specific, technology-associated and procedural determinants. When using a high-sensitive MRI definition differences in SCE-rates in between technologies appear to be less prominent. Further studies on the effects of different periprocedural anticoagulation regimen, different steps of the ablation procedure and new technologies are needed. For now, SCL incidence may determine the thrombogenic potential of an ablation technology and further studies to reduce or avoid SCL generation are desirable. It appears reasonable, that any SCE should be avoided.

Influence of access site choice on incidence of neurologic complications after percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Neurologic complications (NCs) are a rare but potentially devastating complication that may follow percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In recent years, there has been an increase in use of transradial access, driven by a developing body of evidence that favors its use over femoral access. Concerns have been raised, however, that transradial access may increase the risk of NC compared with transfemoral access. We aimed to investigate the influence of access site selection on the occurrence of NCs through a period of transition during which transradial access became the dominant route for PCI procedures performed in the United Kingdom.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society database between January 2006 and December 2010. The data were split into 2 cohorts based on access site. An NC was defined as a periprocedural ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, or transient ischemic attack occurring before hospital discharge. Binary logistic multivariate analysis was used to investigate the influence of access site utilization on NCs and adjust for measured confounding factors.

RESULTS

Between 2006 and 2010, the use of radial access increased from 17.2% to 50.8% of all PCI procedures. A total of 124,616 radial procedures and 223,476 femoral procedures were studied with a NC rate of 0.11% in each cohort. In univariate (odds ratio 1.01, 95% CI 0.82-1.24, P = .93) and multivariate analysis (odds ratio 0.99, 95% CI 0.79-1.23, P = .91), there was no significant association between the use of radial access and the occurrence of NCs.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that radial access is not associated with an increased risk of clinically detected NCs, even during a period when there was a rapid evolution in the preferred access site for PCI in the United Kingdom. These are reassuring results, particularly for operators embarking on a change to radial access for PCI.

Dodecafluoropentane emulsion decreases infarct volume in a rabbit ischemic stroke model

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy of dodecafluoropentane emulsion (DDFPe), a nanodroplet emulsion with significant oxygen transport potential, in decreasing infarct volume in an insoluble-emboli rabbit stroke model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

New Zealand White rabbits (N = 64; weight, 5.1 ± 0.50 kg) underwent angiography and received embolic spheres in occluded internal carotid artery branches. Rabbits were randomly assigned to groups in 4-hour and 7-hour studies. Four-hour groups included control (n = 7, embolized without treatment) and DDFPe treatment 30 minutes before stroke (n = 7), at stroke onset (n = 8), and 30 minutes (n = 5), 1 hour (n = 7), 2 hours (n = 5), or 3 hours after stroke (n = 6). Seven-hour groups included control (n = 6) and DDFPe at 1 hour (n = 8) and 6 hours after stroke (n = 5). DDFPe dose was a 2% weight/volume intravenous injection (0.6 mL/kg) repeated every 90 minutes as time allowed. After euthanasia, infarct volume was determined by vital stains on brain sections.

RESULTS

At 4 hours, median infarct volume decreased for all DDFPe treatment times (pretreatment, 0.30% [P = .004]; onset, 0.20% [P = .004]; 30 min, 0.35% [P = .009]; 1 h, 0.30% [P = .01]; 2 h, 0.40% [P = .009]; and 3 h, 0.25% [P = .003]) compared with controls (3.20%). At 7 hours, median infarct volume decreased with treatment at 1 hour (0.25%; P = .007) but not at 6 hours (1.4%; P = .49) compared with controls (2.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous DDFPe in an animal model decreases infarct volumes and protects brain tissue from ischemia, justifying further investigation.