Clinical Significance of Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Vascular Hyperintensities in Borderzone Infarcts

FLAIR vascular hyperintensity combined with asymmetrical prominent veins in acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke: prediction of collateral circulation and clinical outcome

BACKGROUND

To investigate the value of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity (FVH) within asymmetrical prominent veins sign (APVS) on susceptibility-weighted imaging predicting collateral circulation and prognosis in patients with acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke.

METHOD

Patients with severe stenosis or occlusion of ICA or MCA M1, who underwent MRI within 72 h from stroke onset were reviewed. The Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score was used to evaluate the volume of infarction on DWI, the degree of FVH and APVS. Spearman correlation analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between FVH and APVS. All patients were divided into the good prognosis group and the poor prognosis group according to the score of the modified ranking scale (mRS) 90 days after the stroke. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the relationship between FVH and APVS and functional prognosis, while receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to assess the value of FVH and APVS in predicting prognosis.

RESULTS

Spearman correlation analysis revealed moderate positive correlations between FVH and APVS (r = 0.586, P < 0.001). The poor prognosis group had a higher rate of a history of atrial fibrillation, a larger cerebral infarction volume, a higher NIHSS score at admission, and a higher FVH and APVS score compared with the good prognosis group (all P < 0.05). A further logistic regression indicated that the NIHSS score, cerebral infarction volume, FVH and APVS were independent risk factors for a poor functional prognosis. In terms of FVH, APVS, alone and their combination for the diagnosis of poor prognosis, the sensitivity, specificity, area under the ROC curve (AUC), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were 86.8%, 83.3%, 0.899 (95% CI 0.830-0.968); 60.5%, 93.7%, 0.818 (95% CI 0.723-0.912); 86.8%, 89.6%, 0.921 (95% CI 0.860-0.981), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The presence of FVH and APVS can provide a comprehensive assessment of collateral circulation from the perspective of veins and arteries, and the correlation between the two is positively correlated. Both of them were independent risk factors for poor prognosis, their combination is complementary and can improve the predictive value.

Individualized interpretation for the clinical significance of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vessel hyperintensity in ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack: A systematic narrative review

Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) vessel hyperintensity（FVH）refers to the hyperintensity corresponding to the arteries in the subarachnoid space. It is caused by critically slowed blood flow and is commonly encountered in patients with large artery steno-occlusions. Quite a few studies have focused on the clinical significance of FLAIR vessel hyperintensity in terms of its relationship to the prognosis of transient ischemic attack (TIA), baseline severity or infarction volume, early neurological deterioration or infarction growth, and functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, inconsistent or conflicting findings were common in these studies and caused confusion in the clinical decision-making process guided by this imaging marker. Through reviewing the available studies on the etiologic mechanism of FVH and investigating findings on its clinical significance in AIS and TIA, this review aims to elucidate the key factors for interpreting the clinical significance of FVH individually.

Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Vascular Hyperintensity in Cerebrovascular Disease: A Review for Radiologists and Clinicians

Neuroradiological methods play important roles in neurology, especially in cerebrovascular diseases. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) vascular hyperintensity (FVH) is frequently encountered in patients with acute ischemic stroke and significant intracranial arterial stenosis or occlusion. The mechanisms underlying this phenomenon and the clinical implications of FVH have been a matter of debate. FVH is associated with large-vessel occlusion or severe stenosis, as well as impaired hemodynamics. Possible explanations suggested for its appearance include stationary blood and slow antegrade or retrograde filling of the leptomeningeal collateral circulation. However, the prognostic value of the presence of FVH has been controversial. FVH can also be observed in patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA), which may have different pathomechanisms. Its presence can help clinicians to identify patients who have a higher risk of stroke after TIA. In this review article, we aim to describe the mechanism and influencing factors of FVH, as well as its clinical significance in patients with cerebrovascular disease.

Hyperintense Vessel Sign in Large-Vessel Occlusion Stroke of Mild-to-Moderate Severity Ineligible for Recanalization

Background and Purpose

The impact of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery hyperintense vessels (FHVs) on outcomes in patients ineligible for recanalization therapy with large-vessel occlusion (LVO) is unclear. We investigated the impact of FHVs determined using the FHV–Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) on clinical outcomes in patients with LVO stroke of mild-to-moderate severity ineligible for recanalization therapy.

Methods

Sixty-eight consecutive patients with M1-middle cerebral artery occlusion who underwent magnetic resonance imaging within 24 hours of symptom onset and were ineligible for recanalization were included. Patients were dichotomized into a severe-FHV group (FHV-ASPECTS ≤4; n=33) and a mild-FHV group (FHV-ASPECTS >4; n=35), and multiple logistic regression analysis was used to examine the relationships of FHV scores with early neurological deterioration (END) and an unfavorable 3-month outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≥3).

Results

Mean age was 66.2±13.5 years (mean±SD), and 30 (44%) were female. The severe-FHV group had a larger infarct volume (median, 5.5 mL vs. 3 mL) and more frequently exhibited the susceptibility vessel sign (30% vs. 3%) than the mild-FHV group. Ipsilateral old nonlacunar infarct was more frequent in the mild-FHV group than in the severe-FHV group (37% vs. 15%). The severe-FHV group had a fivefold higher risk of END (odds ratio [OR] 5.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36–18.45) and unfavorable outcome (OR 5.97, 95% CI 1.18–33.31, p=0.03) compared with the mild-FHV group.

Conclusions

Greater FHV extent was associated with higher risk of END and unfavorable outcome in patients with LVO stroke of mild-to-moderate severity.

Association of FLAIR vascular hyperintensity and acute MCA stroke outcome changes with the severity of leukoaraiosis

PURPOSE

The clinical significance of FLAIR vascular hyperintensity (FVH), a marker of collateral circulation in ischaemic stroke, remains controversial. We hypothesised that the association between FVH and outcomes varies with the severity of leukoaraiosis (LA), another marker of collaterals, and that their combined significance may vary with time.

METHODS

We included 459 consecutive patients with middle cerebral artery (MCA) stroke. Proximal and distal FVHs were distinguished based on location. LA was divided into two grades, according to Fazekas scores of 0-2 and 3-6. Symptom-to-MRI time was divided into two categories: ≤ 14 days and ≥ 15 days.

RESULTS

We found no difference in FVH proportion according to LA grade. Multivariate analysis revealed that LA and FVH status were independently associated with unfavourable outcomes (modified Rankin scale ≥ 2) in patients with symptom-to-MRI times ≤ 14 days (P = 0.008), but not in those with symptom-to-MRI times ≥15 days (P = 0.61). In the group with symptom-to-MRI times ≤14 days, patients with LA 3-6 and FVH(+) (OR, 3.044; 95% CI, 1.116-8.305) were more likely to have unfavourable clinical outcomes compared with patients with LA 0-2 and FVH(+) but not compared with those with LA 0-2 and FVH(-) or LA 3-6 and FVH(-). In addition, FVH location did not influence the relationship between FVH and outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The association between FVH and outcomes was influenced by the degree of LA in the acute but not in the subacute and chronic stages of MCA infarction. FVH predicts clinical outcomes independently only in those with more extensive LA.

Clinical prognosis of FLAIR hyperintense arteries in ischaemic stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the association of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) hyperintense arteries (FLAIR-HAs) on brain MRI and prognosis after acute ischaemic stroke (AIS).

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies reporting clinical or imaging outcomes with presence of FLAIR-HAs after AIS. Two researchers independently assessed eligibility of retrieved studies and extracted data, including from the Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study (ENCHANTED). Outcomes were unfavourable functional outcome (primary, modified Rankin scale scores 3-6 or 2-6), death, intermediate clinical and imaging outcomes. We performed subgroup analyses by treatment or types of FLAIR-HAs defined by location (at proximal/distal middle cerebral artery (MCA), within/beyond diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) lesion) or extent.

RESULTS

We included 36 cohort studies (33 prospectively collected) involving 3577 patients. FLAIR-HAs were not associated with functional outcome overall (pooled risk ratio 0.87, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.06), but were significantly associated with better outcome in those receiving endovascular therapy (0.56, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.75). Contrary to FLAIR-HAs at proximal MCA or within DWI lesions, FLAIR-HAs beyond DWI lesions were associated with better outcome (0.67, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.79). FLAIR-HAs favoured recanalisation (1.21, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.38) with increased risk of intracerebral haemorrhage (2.07, 95% CI 1.37 to 3.13) and early neurological deterioration (1.93, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.85).

CONCLUSIONS

FLAIR-HAs were not associated with functional outcome overall but were associated with outcome after endovascular therapy for AIS. FLAIR-HAs were also associated with early recanalisation or haemorrhagic complications, and early neurologic deterioration.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019131168.

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) ischemic volume is related to FLAIR hyperintensity-DWI mismatch and functional outcome after endovascular therapy

BACKGROUND

We assessed whether diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) volume was associated with fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensities (FVH)-DWI mismatch and functional outcome in patients with acute stroke who received endovascular therapy (EVT).

METHODS

Fifty-three acute stroke patients who received EVT were enrolled. FVH-DWI mismatch, DWI volume on admission, DWI volume on follow-up, DWI volume growth, the functional outcome at 3 months (mRS) and other clinical data were collected. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate the value of DWI volume in predicting functional outcome after stroke.

RESULTS

The FVH-DWI mismatch group had a smaller DWI volume on admission (13.86±19.58 vs. 65.07±52.21; t=-4.301, P=0.000), a smaller DWI volume on follow-up (29.88±33.52 vs. 112.43±87.19; t=-4.143, P=0.000), and a lower DWI volume growth (16.02±19.90 vs. 47.36±40.06; t=-3.326, P=0.003) than those of the no FVH-DWI mismatch group. The good functional outcome group had a smaller DWI volume on admission (13.30±13.26 vs. 68.56±54.28; t=-5.611, P=0.000), a smaller DWI volume on follow-up (27.65±18.80 vs. 120.25±90.37; t=-5.720, P=0.000), lower DWI volume growth (14.35±15.06 vs. 51.69±41.17; t=-4.737, P=0.001) and a higher FVH-DWI mismatch ratio (75.76% vs. 35%; t=8.647; P=0.004) than those of the poor functional outcome group. ROC analysis showed that the sensitivity and specificity of DWI volume on admission for predicting functional outcome were 65% and 96.97%, respectively (the optimal cut-off value: 33.50 mL); DWI volume on follow-up was 48.6 mL, with a sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 87.88%, respectively; DWI volume growth was 22.25 mL, with a sensitivity and specificity of 70% and 87.88%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

DWI volume and DWI volume growth can provide the prognostic information of acute stroke patients after thrombectomy.

Application of FLAIR Vascular Hyperintensity-DWI Mismatch in Ischemic Stroke Depending on Semi-Quantitative DWI-Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score

Objective: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) is a simple, widely used method to estimate the size of the infarct. Our aim is to determine whether there is a relationship between DWI-ASPECTS and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) vascular hyperintensity (FVH)-DWI mismatch and to better quantify FVH-DWI mismatch to assess the prognosis of cerebral infarction.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 109 patients with MCA stenosis or occlusion with cerebral infarction was performed by dividing this cohort into FVH-DWI match group and FVH-DWI mismatch group based on FVH and DWI results. The clinical and imaging data of these two groups of patients were reviewed and analyzed to identify associations between FVH-DWI mismatch and prognosis of patients for preservation of neurological function. Correlation between DWI-ASPECTS and FVH-DWI mismatch was also performed.

Results: FVH-DWI mismatch was present in 66/109 (60.55%) patients, and FVH-DWI match was present in 43/109 (39.45%). Patients with FVH-DWI mismatch had higher DWI-ASPECTS (7.0 vs. 4.0, P < 0.001) and lower mRS at 3 months (3.0 vs. 4.0, P < 0.001) than patients without FVH-DWI mismatch. Multiple regression analysis suggested that DWI-ASPECTS (OR = 4.7, 95% CI = 2.5–9.2, P < 0.001) remained significantly associated with FVH-DWI mismatch. Two threshold points for DWI-ASPECTS of 3 and 8 can be used to distinguish whether there is a mismatch in FVH-DWI by smooth curve fitting.

Conclusions: The DWI-ASPECTS score was an independent predictor of FVH-DWI mismatch. At DWI-ASPECTS ≤ 3, the FVH-DWI mismatch offers no prognostic value; whereas, at DWI-ASPECTS ≥ 8, the FVH-DWI mismatch had the highest prognostic value. DWI-ASPECTS can roughly determine whether there is a FVH-DWI mismatch in order to select optimal clinical treatment and accurately assess prognosis.

Diffusion-weighted imaging volume and diffusion-weighted imaging volume growth in acute stroke: associations with fluid-attenuated inversion recovery hyperintensities-diffusion-weighted imaging mismatch and functional outcome

PURPOSE

This study assessed the association between diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) volume and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity (FVH)-DWI mismatch, functional outcome in patients with acute stroke patients receiving endovascular therapy, as well as the value of DWI volume in predicting functional outcome with stroke patients.

METHODS

In 38 stroke patients who received endovascular therapy, FVH-DWI mismatch, DWI volume on admission, DWI volume on follow-up, DWI volume growth, the functional outcome at 3 months [modified Rankin scale (mRS)], and other clinical data were collected. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the associations with the above variables and predict functional outcome after stroke.

RESULTS

Compared with no FVH-DWI mismatch group (n = 15), FVH-DWI mismatch group (n = 23) had a smaller DWI volume on admission (t = -2.980; P = 0.008), smaller DWI volume on follow-up (t = -2.911; P = 0.009), lower DWI volume growth (t = -2.328; P = 0.031). The 3-month outcome (1.87 ± 0.92) in patients with FVH-DWI mismatch was better than that (2.93 ± 1.62) of patients with no FVH-DWI mismatch (t = -2.307; P = 0.032). Spearman's rank correlation analysis revealed that FVH-DWI mismatch (r = 0.327; P = 0.045), DWI volume on admission (r = 0.414; P = 0.010), DWI volume on follow-up (r = 0.486; P = 0.002), and DWI volume growth (r = 0.467; P = 0.003) were positively correlated with mRS at 3 months. ROC analysis showed when the optimal cutoff value of DWI volume on admission was 33.50, the sensitivity and specificity for predicting functional outcome was 60 and 95.65%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluating DWI volume on admission, DWI volume on follow-up as well as DWI volume growth comprehensively may be useful in predicting the functional outcome of acute stroke patients after thrombectomy.

The Association between FLAIR Vascular Hyperintensity and Stroke Outcome Varies with Time from Onset

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

FLAIR vascular hyperintensity has been recognized as a marker of collaterals in ischemic stroke, but the impact on outcome is still controversial. We hypothesized that the association between FLAIR vascular hyperintensity and outcome varies with time.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 459 consecutive patients with middle cerebral artery stroke and divided them into 3 groups by symptom-to-MR imaging time (group 1, ≤7 days; group 2, 8-14 days; group 3, ≥15 days). The FLAIR vascular hyperintensity score, ranging from 0 to 3 points, was based on territory distributions of different MCA segments. The associations between FLAIR vascular hyperintensity and outcome with time were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively.

RESULTS

No patients underwent MR imaging within 6 hours of onset. The proportion of FLAIR vascular hyperintensity (+) and severe stenosis or occlusion of MCA was not significantly dependent on time. In groups 1 and 2, FLAIR vascular hyperintensity (+) was significantly associated with larger lesions, the prevalence of flow injury, and unfavorable outcome (mRS ≥ 2). There were no such associations in group 3. Multiple logistic regressions demonstrated that FLAIR vascular hyperintensity (+) was an independent risk factor for unfavorable outcome in group 2. Infarction volume tended to increase with the increase of the distal FLAIR vascular hyperintensity score in groups 1 and 2, while declining in group 3.

CONCLUSIONS

FLAIR vascular hyperintensity is associated with unfavorable outcome within 6 hours to 14 days of onset, while the wider distribution of distal FLAIR vascular hyperintensity may be favorable beyond 14 days of onset in MCA infarction. Symptom-to-MR imaging time should be considered when assessing the prognostic value of FLAIR vascular hyperintensity.

Predictors of short-term outcome in patients with acute middle cerebral artery occlusion: unsuitability of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity scores

Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) vascular hyperintensity (FVH) is used to assess leptomeningeal collateral circulation, but clinical outcomes of patients with FVH can be very different. The aim of the present study was to assess a FVH score and explore its relationship with clinical outcomes. Patients with acute ischemic stroke due to middle cerebral artery M1 occlusion underwent magnetic resonance imaging and were followed up at 10 days (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) and 90 days (modified Rankin Scale) to determine short-term clinical outcomes. Effective collateral circulation indirectly improved recovery of neurological function and short-term clinical outcome by extending the size of the pial penumbra and reducing infarct lesions. FVH score showed no correlation with 90-day functional clinical outcome and was not sufficient as an independent predictor of short-term clinical outcome.

Infarct morphology assessment in patients with carotid artery/middle cerebral artery occlusion using fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) vascular hyperintensity (FVH)

We aim to evaluate the value of fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) vascular hyperintensity (FVH) in assessing infarct morphology in patients with symptomatic internal carotid artery (ICA) or middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusions. Magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) FLAIR sequences, and carotid/cerebral magnetic resonance angiography of 102 patients with symptomatic ICA or MCA occlusions were evaluated. The location and score of FVH were determined using Olindo’s method; patients were classified as having Low or High FVHs based on FVH score, and either Distal or Proximal FVH based on FVH location. The differences between infarct morphologies were analyzed. FVH were detectable in 62 patients with High FVH and in 40 patients with Low FVHs based on the Olindo’s scale. There were no statistically significant differences in age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, smoking history, and vascular occlusive site between High and Low FVHs patients, except for infarct morphology (P<0.01). Patients with Distal FVH presented with significant (P<0.01) perforating artery and border zone infarcts, whereas those with Proximal FVH had significant (P<0.01) large territorial infarcts. The scores and locations of FVH could be a predictive imaging marker for infarct morphology in patients with symptomatic ICA or MCA occlusion.

Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensities in predicting cerebral hyperperfusion after intracranial arterial stenting

PURPOSE

No reliable imaging sign predicting cerebral hyperperfusion after intracranial arterial stenting (IAS) had been described in the literature. This study evaluated the effect of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensities (FVHs), also called hyperintense vessel sign on T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T2-FLAIR) MR images, in predicting significant increase in cerebral blood flow (CBF) defined by arterial spin labeling (ASL) after IAS.

METHODS

We reviewed ASL CBF images and T2-FLAIR MR images before (D0), 1 day after (D1), and 3 days after (D3) IAS of 16 patients. T1-weighted MR images were used as cerebral maps for calculating CBF. The changes in CBF values after IAS were calculated in and compared among stenting and nonstenting vascular territories. An increase more than 50% of CBF was considered as hyperperfusion. The effect of FVHs in predicting hyperperfusion was calculated.

RESULTS

The D1 CBF value was significantly higher than the D0 CBF value in stenting vascular, contralateral anterior cerebral artery, contralateral middle cerebral artery, and contralateral posterior cerebral artery (PCA) territories (all P < .05). The D1 and D3 CBF values were significantly higher than the D0 CBF value in overall vascular (P < .001), overall nonstenting vascular (P < .001), and ipsilateral PCA (P < .05) territories. The rate of more than 50% increases in CBF was significantly higher in patients who exhibited asymmetric FVHs than in those who did not exhibit these findings.

CONCLUSION

FVHs could be a critical predictor of a significant increase in CBF after IAS.