Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy Remains the Basis and Mainstay of Revascularizing Therapy!

Nursing Process Design of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Elderly Patients with Acute Cerebral Infarction

The economy of contemporary society is developing rapidly and the society is making continuous progress. The population is aging and diet structure is also adjusted. Acute cerebral infarction(ACI) in the elderly has become a common disease that seriously threatens the health of the elderly. Therefore, research on nursing of senile ACI is of great significance. Nursing is essential in the thrombolytic therapy of cerebral infarction. This article aims to study the process design of intravenous thrombolytic nursing for elderly patients with ACI and the conclusions are as follows: the nursing process has a good nursing effect. This increased the Barthel index of elderly patients with ACI after intravenous thrombolysis care by 15.8 compared with that before care. Compared with the traditional nursing mode, the nursing course and cost are significantly reduced.

Intravenous Thrombolysis by Telestroke in the 3- to 4.5-h Time Window

Background: While intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in ischemic stroke can be safely applied in telestroke networks within 3 h from symptom onset, there is a lack of evidence for safety in the expanded 3- to 4. 5-h time window. We assessed the safety and short-term efficacy of IVT in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in the expanded time window delivered through a hub-and-spoke telestroke network. Methods: Observational study of patients with AIS who received IVT at the Stroke Eastern Saxony Telemedical Network between 01/2014 and 12/2015. We compared safety data including symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH; according to European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study II definition) and any intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) between patients admitted to telestroke spoke sites and patients directly admitted to a tertiary stroke center representing the hub of the network. We also assessed short-term efficacy data including favorable functional outcome (i.e., modified Rankin Scale ≤ 2) and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at discharge, hospital discharge disposition, and in-hospital mortality. Results: In total, 152 patients with AIS were treated with IVT in the expanded time window [spoke sites, n = 104 (26.9%); hub site, n = 48 (25.9%)]. Patients treated at spoke sites had less frequently a large vessel occlusion [8/104 (7.7) vs. 20/48 (41.7%); p < 0.0001], a determined stroke etiology (p < 0.0001) and had slightly shorter onset-to-treatment times [210 (45) vs. 228 (58) min; p = 0.02] than patients who presented to the hub site. Both cohorts did not display any further differences in demographics, vascular risk factors, median baseline NIHSS scores, or median baseline Alberta stroke program early CT score (p > 0.05). There was no difference in the frequency of sICH (4.9 vs. 6.3%; p = 0.71) or any ICH (8.7 vs. 16.7%; p = 0.15). Neither there was a difference regarding favorable functional outcome (44.1 vs. 39.6%; p = 0.6) nor median NIHSS [3 (5.5) vs. 2.5 (5.75); p = 0.92] at discharge, hospital discharge disposition (p = 0.28), or in-hospital mortality (9.6 vs. 8.3%; p = 1.0). Multivariable modeling did not reveal an association between telestroke and sICH or favorable functional outcome (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Delivery of IVT in the expanded 3- to 4.5-h time window through a telestroke network appears to be safe with equivalent short-term functional outcomes for spoke-and-hub center admissions.

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Recombinant Human Prourokinase and Alteplase in the Treatment of STEMI and Analysis of Influencing Factors of Efficacy

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of recombinant human prourokinase (rhPro-UK) and alteplase for thrombolytic therapy in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and to analyze the related factors affecting efficacy.

METHODS

From January 2017 to December 2019, 100 patients diagnosed with STEMI were selected and randomly divided into the control group (n = 50) and the observation group (n = 50). Based on conventional treatments, the control group was treated with alteplase, and the observation group was treated with rhPro-UK, and both were treated for 7 days. After treatment, the vascular recanalization, left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were compared. The bleeding and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were recorded in both groups. According to the patient's vascular recanalization, it was divided into two subgroups: recanalization group and occlusion group. Multiple logistic regression models were used to analyze the related factors that affect the efficacy.

RESULTS

The recanalization rate of the observation group (96.00%) was higher than that of the control group (84.00%) (P < 0.05). After treatment, LVDs and LVEDD in both groups were lower than those before treatment, and LVEF was higher than that before treatment. The LVDs and LVEDD in the observation group were lower than those in the control group, and the LVEF was higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of bleeding in the observation group (2.00%) was lower than that in the control group (12.00%), and the incidence of MACE (4.00%) was lower than that in the control group (16.00%) (P < 0.05). Univariate analysis showed that age, smoking history, diabetes history, myocardial infarction history, infarct location, and intravenous thrombolysis time were related to the efficacy after treatment (P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic analysis showed that age, history of diabetes, vascular infarction site, and venous thrombolysis time were independent influencing factors after treatment (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both rhPro-UK and alteplase thrombolytic therapy can effectively recanalize blood vessels and improve the cardiac function of patients with STEMI. However, rhPro-UK has better effect than alteplase and is safer and worth promoting. The curative effect is related to age, diabetes history, vascular infarction site, and venous thrombolysis time.

Thrombus-targeted nanoparticles for thrombin-triggered thrombolysis and local inflammatory microenvironment regulation

Thrombus related diseases seriously threaten human's health and life. The drawbacks of thrombolytic drugs, such as poor targeting ability and unexpected bleeding complications limit their clinical application. Thus, targeted delivery and controlled release of drugs at local thrombus sites to achieve efficient thrombolysis is an urgent event to be resolved. Herein, we developed an intelligent system MnO₂/uPA@pep-Fuco for precise thrombolysis and thrombus inflammatory microenvironment remodeling. MnO₂/uPA@pep-Fuco exhibited an excellent thrombus targeting ability via the high affinity of fucoidan (Fuco) for P-selectin overexpressed by activated platelets. And then pep-Fuco modified onto the surface of mesopore could be removed to release urokinase (uPA) locally under the high level of thrombin microenvironment in thrombus site. Meanwhile, due to the catalase-like activity of MnO₂ nanoplatform, MnO₂/uPA@pep-Fuco could regulate the inflammatory thrombus microenvironment by eliminating hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), so as to achieve a collaborative thrombolysis therapy. In ferric chloride (FeCl₃)-induced carotid thrombus models, MnO₂/uPA@pep-Fuco specifically targeted to the obstructive artery (3.43 times that of the normal artery) and significantly decreased the percentage of thrombus closure (5.99 ± 5.07%), demonstrating the superior thrombolysis ability. In addition, the significantly reduced tail bleeding time suggested MnO₂/uPA@pep-Fuco might possess a low risk of bleeding complications.

Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke After Recent Myocardial Infarction: Case Series and Systematic Review

Background and Purpose- The safety of IV r-tPA (intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treatment after recent myocardial infarction (MI) is still a matter of debate. We studied the safety of delivering IV r-tPA to AIS patients with a MI within the preceding 3 months. Methods- Retrospective review of consecutive AIS admitted to 2 tertiary university hospitals' and systematic literature review for AIS patients with history of MI in the previous 3 months. Patients were divided into 2 groups: treated or not treated with standard IV r-tPA dose for AIS. Cardiac complications (cardiac rupture/tamponade, intracardiac thrombus embolization, or life-threatening arrhythmias) were compared between groups and assessed by type of MI (non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI], or STEMI) and time elapsed between vascular events. Results- One hundred and two patients were included; 46 (45.1%) were derived from literature review. Median age (interquartile range) was 64 (53-75) years old, and 69 (67.6%) were men. Forty-seven (46.1%) received IV r-tPA. In the treated group, 25 (53.2%) and 23 (48.9%) patients had, respectively, concurrent AIS and MI and STEMI, in comparison with 12 (21.8%; P=0.002) and 36 (65.5%; P=0.110) patients in the nontreated. Four (8.5%) IV r-tPA-treated patients died from confirmed or presumed cardiac rupture/ tamponade, all with a STEMI in the week preceding stroke. This complication occurred in 1 (1.8%) patients in the nontreated group (P=0.178). There were no differences in thrombus embolization (1 [2.1%) versus 2 [3.6]; P=1.000) and life-threatening arrhythmias (3 [6.4%) versus 7 [12.7]; P=0.335). No non-STEMI patients receiving IV r-tPA had cardiac complications. Conclusions- In patients with AIS and recent or concurrent MI, MI type and the time elapsed between the 2 events should be taken into consideration when deciding to deliver IV r-tPA. Although recent non-STEMI or concurrent events seem safe, STEMI in the week preceding stroke should prompt caution. The low number of events and publication bias may have influenced our conclusions.