Elucidating the Structural and Functional Correlates of Upper-Limb Poststroke Motor Impairment

The relationship between corticospinal excitability and structural integrity in stroke patients

BACKGROUND

Evaluation of the structural integrity and functional excitability of the corticospinal tract (CST) is likely to be important in predicting motor recovery after stroke. Previous reports are inconsistent regarding a possible link between CST structure and CST function in this setting. This study aims to investigate the structure‒function relationship of the CST at the acute phase of stroke (<7 days).

METHODS

We enrolled 70 patients who had an acute ischaemic stroke with unilateral upper extremity (UE) weakness. They underwent a multimodal assessment including clinical severity (UE Fugl Meyer at day 7 and 3 months), MRI to evaluate the CST lesion load and transcranial magnetic stimulation to measure the maximum amplitude of motor evoked potential (MEP).

RESULTS

A cross-sectional lesion load above 87% predicted the absence of MEPs with an accuracy of 80.4%. In MEP-positive patients, the CST structure/function relationship was bimodal with a switch from a linear relationship (rho=-0.600, 95% CI -0.873; -0.039, p<0.03) for small MEP amplitudes (<0.703 mV) to a non-linear relationship for higher MEP amplitudes (p=0.72). In MEP-positive patients, recovery correlated with initial severity. In patients with a positive MEP <0.703 mV but not in patients with an MEP ≥0.703 mV, MEP amplitude was an additional independent predictor of recovery. In MEP-negative patients, we failed to identify any factor predicting recovery.

CONCLUSION

This large multimodal study on the structure/function of the CST and stroke recovery proposes a paradigm change for the MEP-positive patients phenotypes and refines the nature of the link between structural integrity and neurophysiological function, with implications for study design and prognostic information.

The assessment of interhemispheric imbalance using functional near-infrared spectroscopic and transcranial magnetic stimulation for predicting motor outcome after stroke

Objective

To investigate changes in interhemispheric imbalance of cortical excitability during motor recovery after stroke and to clarify the relationship between motor function recovery and alterations in interhemispheric imbalance, with the aim to establish more effective neuromodulation strategies.

Methods

Thirty-one patients underwent assessments of resting motor threshold (RMT) using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS); the cortical activity of the primary motor cortex (M1), premotor cortex (PMC), and supplementary motor area (SMA) using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS); as well as motor function using upper extremity Fugl-Meyer (FMA-UE). The laterality index (LI) of RMT and fNIRS were also calculated. All indicators were measured at baseline(T1) and 1 month later(T2). Correlations between motor function outcome and TMS and fNIRS metrics at baseline were analyzed using bivariate correlation.

Results

All the motor function (FMA-UE1, FMA-UE2, FMA-d2) and LI-RMT (LI-RMT1 and LI-RMT2) had a moderate negative correlation. The higher the corticospinal excitability of the affected hemisphere, the better the motor outcome of the upper extremity, especially in the distal upper extremity (r = -0.366, p = 0.043; r = -0.393, p = 0.029). The greater the activation of the SMA of the unaffected hemisphere, the better the motor outcome, especially in the distal upper extremity (r = -0.356, p = 0.049; r = -0.367, p = 0.042). There was a significant moderate positive correlation observed between LI-RMT2 and LI-SMA1 (r = 0.422, p = 0.018). The improvement in motor function was most significant when both LI-RMT1 and LI-SMA1 were lower. Besides, in patients dominated by unaffected hemisphere corticospinal excitability during motor recovery, LI-(M1 + SMA + PMC)2 exhibited a significant moderate positive association with the proximal upper extremity function 1 month later (r = 0.642, p = 0.007).

Conclusion

The combination of both TMS and fNIRS can infer the prognosis of motor function to some extent. Which can infer the role of both hemispheres in recovery and may contribute to the development of effective individualized neuromodulation strategies.

Efficacy of interactive manual dexterity training after stroke: a pilot single-blinded randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of Dextrain Manipulandum™ training of dexterity components such as force control and independent finger movements, to dose-matched conventional therapy (CT) post-stroke.

METHODS

A prospective, single-blind, pilot randomized clinical trial was conducted. Chronic-phase post-stroke patients with mild-to-moderate dexterity impairment (Box and Block Test (BBT) > 1) received 12 sessions of Dextrain or CT. Blinded measures were obtained before and after training and at 3-months follow-up. Primary outcome was BBT-change (after-before training). Secondary outcomes included changes in motor impairments, activity limitations and dexterity components. Corticospinal excitability and short intracortical inhibition (SICI) were measured using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

RESULTS

BBT-change after training did not differ between the Dextrain (N = 21) vs CT group (N = 21) (median [IQR] = 5[2-7] vs 4[2-7], respectively; P = 0.36). Gains in BBT were maintained at the 3-month post-training follow-up, with a non-significant trend for enhanced BBT-change in the Dextrain group (median [IQR] = 3[- 1-7.0], P = 0.06). Several secondary outcomes showed significantly larger changes in the Dextrain group: finger tracking precision (mean ± SD = 0.3 ± 0.3N vs - 0.1 ± 0.33N; P < 0.0018), independent finger movements (34.7 ± 25.1 ms vs 7.7 ± 18.5 ms, P = 0.02) and maximal finger tapping speed (8.4 ± 7.1 vs 4.5 ± 4.9, P = 0.045). At follow-up, Dextrain group showed significantly greater improvement in Motor Activity Log (median/IQR = 0.7/0.2-0.8 vs 0.2/0.1-0.6, P = 0.05). Across both groups SICI increased in patients with greater BBT-change (Rho = 0.80, P = 0.006). Comparing Dextrain subgroups with maximal grip force higher/lower than median (61.2%), BBT-change was significantly larger in patients with low vs high grip force (7.5 ± 5.6 vs 2.9 ± 2.8; respectively, P = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

Although immediate improvements in gross dexterity post-stroke did not significantly differ between Dextrain training and CT, our findings suggest that Dextrain enhances recovery of several dexterity components and reported hand-use, particularly when motor impairment is moderate (low initial grip force). Findings need to be confirmed in a larger trial. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03934073 (retrospectively registered).

Effects of bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation on motor recovery in subacute stroke patients: a double-blind, randomized sham-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the primary motor cortex (M1) can simultaneously modulate bilateral corticospinal excitability and interhemispheric interaction. However, how tDCS affects subacute stroke recovery remains unclear. We investigated the effects of bihemispheric tDCS on motor recovery in subacute stroke patients.

METHODS

We enrolled subacute inpatients who had first-ever ischemic stroke at subcortical regions and moderate-to-severe baseline Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score 2-56. Participants between 14 and 28 days after stroke were double-blind, randomly assigned (1:1) to receive real (n = 13) or sham (n = 14) bihemispheric tDCS (with ipsilesional M1 anode and contralesional M1 cathode, 20 min, 2 mA) during task practice twice daily for 20 sessions in two weeks. Residual integrity of the ipsilesional corticospinal tract was stratified between groups. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in FMA-UE score from baseline (responder as an increase ≥ 10). The secondary measures included changes in the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), FMA-Lower Extremity (FMA-LE) and explorative resting-state MRI functional connectivity (FC) of target regions after intervention and three months post-stroke.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven participants completed the study without significant adverse effects. Nineteen patients (70%) had no recordable baseline motor-evoked potentials (MEP-negative) from the paretic forearm. Compared with the sham group, the real tDCS group showed enhanced improvement of FMA-UE after intervention (p < 0.01, effect size η² = 0.211; responder rate: 77% vs. 36%, p = 0.031), which sustained three months post-stroke (p < 0.01), but not ARAT. Interestingly, in the MEP-negative subgroup analysis, the FMA-UE improvement remained but delayed. Additionally, the FMA-LE improvement after real tDCS was not significantly greater until three months post-stroke (p < 0.01). We found that the individual FMA-UE improvements after real tDCS were associated with bilateral intrahemispheric, rather than interhemispheric, FC strengths in the targeted cortices, while the improvements after sham tDCS were associated with predominantly ipsilesional FC changes after adjustment for age and sex (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Bihemispheric tDCS during task-oriented training may facilitate motor recovery in subacute stroke patients, even with compromised corticospinal tract integrity. Further studies are warranted for tDCS efficacy and network-specific neuromodulation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: (ID: NCT02731508).

Cerebello-Motor Paired Associative Stimulation and Motor Recovery in Stroke: a Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind Pilot Trial

Cerebellum is a key structure for functional motor recovery after stroke. Enhancing the cerebello-motor pathway by paired associative stimulation (PAS) might improve upper limb function. Here, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled pilot trial investigating the efficacy of a 5-day treatment of cerebello-motor PAS coupled with physiotherapy for promoting upper limb motor function compared to sham stimulation. The secondary objectives were to determine in the active treated group (i) whether improvement of upper limb motor function was associated with changes in corticospinal excitability or changes in functional activity in the primary motor cortex and (ii) whether improvements were correlated to the structural integrity of the input and output pathways. To that purpose, hand dexterity and maximal grip strength were assessed along with TMS recordings and multimodal magnetic resonance imaging, before the first treatment, immediately after the last one and a month later. Twenty-seven patients were analyzed. Cerebello-motor PAS was effective compared to sham in improving hand dexterity (p: 0.04) but not grip strength. This improvement was associated with increased activation in the ipsilesional primary motor cortex (p: 0.04). Moreover, the inter-individual variability in clinical improvement was partly explained by the structural integrity of the afferent (p: 0.06) and efferent pathways (p: 0.02) engaged in this paired associative stimulation (i.e., cortico-spinal and dentato-thalamo-cortical tracts). In conclusion, cerebello-motor-paired associative stimulation combined with physiotherapy might be a promising approach to enhance upper limb motor function after stroke.Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02284087.

Multimodal Assessment of the Motor System in Patients With Chronic Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Despite continuing efforts in the multimodal assessment of the motor system after stroke, conclusive findings on the complementarity of functional and structural metrics of the ipsilesional corticospinal tract integrity and the role of the contralesional hemisphere are still lacking. This research aimed to find the best combination of motor system metrics, allowing the classification of patients into 3 predefined groups of upper limb motor recovery.

METHODS

We enrolled 35 chronic ischemic stroke patients (mean 47 [26-66] years old, 29 [6-58] months poststroke) with a single supratentorial lesion and unilateral upper extremity weakness. Patients were divided into 3 groups, depending on upper limb motor recovery: good, moderate, and bad. Nonparametric statistical tests and regression analysis were used to investigate the relationships among microstructural (fractional anisotropy (FA) ratio of the corticospinal tracts at the internal capsule (IC) level (classic method) and along the length of the tracts (Fréchet distance), and of the corpus callosum) and functional (motor evoked potentials [MEPs] for 2 hand muscles) motor system metrics. Stratification rules were also tested using a decision tree classifier.

RESULTS

IC FA ratio in the IC and MEP absence were both equally discriminative of the bad motor outcome (96% accuracy). For the 3 recovery groups' classification, the best parameter combination was IC FA ratio and the Fréchet distance between the contralesional and ipsilesional corticospinal tract FA profiles (91% accuracy). No other metrics had any additional value for patients' classification. MEP presence differed for 2 investigated muscles.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that better separation between 3 motor recovery groups may be achieved when considering the similarity between corticospinal tract FA profiles along its length in addition to region of interest-based assessment and lesion load calculation. Additionally, IC FA ratio and MEP absence are equally important markers for poor recovery, while for MEP probing it may be important to investigate more than one hand muscle.