Statins After Ischemic Stroke in the Oldest: A Cohort Study Using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Database

Long-term risk of major adverse cardiovascular events following ischemic stroke or TIA

Data are scarce on long-term outcomes after ischemic stroke (IS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA). In this prospective cohort study, we examined the cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after IS and TIA using a competing risk model and factors associated with new events using a Cox-proportional hazard regression model. All patients discharged alive from Östersund Hospital with IS or TIA between 2010 and 2013 (n = 1535) were followed until 31 December 2017. The primary endpoint was a composite of IS, type 1 acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and cardiovascular (CV) death. Secondary endpoints were the individual components of the primary endpoint, in all patients and separated in IS and TIA subgroups. The cumulative incidence of MACE (median follow-up: 4.4 years) was 12.8% (95% CI: 11.2-14.6) within 1 year after discharge and 35.6% (95% CI: 31.8-39.4) by the end of follow-up. The risk of MACE and CV death was significantly increased in IS compared to TIA (p-values < 0.05), but not the risk of IS or type 1 AMI. Age, kidney failure, prior IS, prior AMI, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and impaired functional status, were associated with an increased risk of MACE. The risk of recurring events after IS and TIA is high. IS patients have a higher risk of MACE and CV death than TIA patients.

Pharmacological therapy in the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke in the oldest-old patients: has it improved in recent decades?

INTRODUCTION

Population aging has caused an increase in strokes in very elderly patients (VEP). We assess how secondary prevention of ischemic stroke has changed in VEP in recent decades.

METHOD

Retrospective study of discharges due to ischemic stroke in the Virgen Macarena, Virgen del Rocio and Valme hospitals in Seville (Spain), during the periods 1999-2001, 2014-16 and 2019-2020. VEP were considered those with ≥80 years.

RESULT

We studied 1806 patients, 349 (19.3%) were VEP. Over the years, VEPs have doubled (13.5% vs. 25.9% and 28% p = 0.0001) and age has increased (83.3 ± 3 vs. 84.1 ± 3 vs. 85.2 ± 4 p = 0.001). Comparing the periods, the VEPs have more hypertension (69.9% vs. 84.8% vs. 84.6%; p = 0.0001) and dyslipidemia (12% vs. 41.7% vs. 52.3%; p = 0.0001) and have prescribed more antihypertensives (69.1% vs. 86.7% vs. 92.3%; p = 0.0001), statins (5.3% vs. 78% vs. 81.5%; p = 0.0001) and anticoagulants (16.5% vs. 19.4% vs. 53.1%; p = 0.001), increasing the number of antihypertensives (1 ± 0.9 vs. 1.6 ± 0, 9 vs. 1.9 ± 0.8 drugs p = 0.0001), and high-intensity statins (2.3% vs. 42.7 vs. 69.2% p = 0.0001). Comparing the VEPs with the younger ones, there were no differences in antihypertensive treatment in any period, there were differences in antithrombotic treatment in the first period, and with statins the differences were maintained until the end.

CONCLUSIONS

In the last 20 years the number of VEPs has doubled, exceeding a quarter of the discharges. Although there is improvement in secondary stroke prevention in VEPs, there is room for improvement.