Secondary Medium Vessel Occlusions: When Clots Move North

Endovascular thrombectomy for distal medium vessel occlusions: A literature review

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of substantial evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of endovascular thrombectomy in treating distal medium vessel occlusions (DMVOs).

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the current evidence regarding endovascular thrombectomy for DMVOs.

METHODS

We conducted a narrative review of key articles related to the diagnosis and management of DMVOs. We manually searched PubMed and Google Scholar from January 2010 to July 2023, and only included articles published in the English language.

RESULTS

While diagnosing and treating DMVOs is tricky due to access limitations and potential limited benefit from mechanical clot removal, recent improvements in catheter and retrieval technology suggest that endovascular thrombectomy might be a potential treatment option. However, more high-quality research is needed to confirm its effectiveness for DMVOs.

CONCLUSION

Experts disagree on how to classify DMVOs and what the best mode of endovascular treatment is.

Finding MeVO: Identifying Intracranial Medium-Vessel Occlusions at CT Angiography

The development of methods to detect and treat intracranial large-vessel occlusions (LVOs) has revolutionized the management of acute ischemic stroke. CT angiography (CTA) of the head and neck is effective in depicting LVOs and widely used in the evaluation of patients who have had a stroke. Ongoing efforts are now focused on the potential to detect and treat intracranial medium-vessel occlusions (MeVOs), which by definition are smaller than LVOs and thus more difficult to detect with CTA. The authors review common and variant anatomies of medium-sized cerebral arteries and the appearance of a variety of MeVOs on CT angiograms. Possible pitfalls in MeVO detection include rare anatomic variants, calcified thrombi, and stump occlusions. Current recommendations for performing CTA and ancillary methods that might aid in MeVO detection are discussed. Understanding the relevant anatomy and the variety of appearances of MeVOs aids radiologists in identifying these occlusions, particularly in the setting of urgent stroke. ©RSNA, 2024 See the invited commentary by Ospel and Nguyen in this issue.

Flow restoration during mechanical thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion is associated with an immediate reduction of systemic blood pressure

INTRODUCTION

Managing blood pressure in patients with large vessel occlusion affects infarct size and clinical outcomes. We examined how restoring blood flow impacts systemic blood pressure during mechanical thrombectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation undergoing mechanical thrombectomy between June 2016 and January 2018 were screened. We included those treated under local anesthesia or conscious sedation and analyzed standardized anesthesia protocols to assess systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels throughout the procedure. The primary outcome was the change of blood pressure, compared 5 min before versus 5 min after the last recanalization attempt. Successful reperfusion was defined as Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score ⩾ 2b.

RESULTS

Of 134 patients, 117 (87%) achieved successful angiographic reperfusion, showing a notable systolic blood pressure drop 5 min after flow restoration (10.2 ± 14.6 vs 3.24 ± 8.65 mm Hg, p = 0.009). Successful angiographic reperfusion was a significant predictor for this decrease in multivariable logistic regression: OR = 1.34 (95% CI: 1.03-1.73, p = 0.0299). Among 66 patients not given circulation-affecting meds, a significant systolic pressure reduction was also observed (155 ± 17 mm Hg to 148 ± 17 mm Hg ; p < 0.001). No diastolic pressure changes were significant.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Flow restoration was associated with an immediate reduction of systolic blood pressure values in patients undergoing mechanical recanalization under local anesthesia or conscious sedation. This suggests a complex interplay between endovascular stroke therapy and cardiovascular hemodynamics.

Medium vessel occlusion thrombectomy: Single center experience using the 3 MAX catheter

INTRODUCTION

Thrombectomy for medium vessel occlusion is a topic of great interest. We describe a single-center experience with the Penumbra 3-MAX aspiration catheter in stroke thrombectomy of medium vessel occlusion(MeVO). We investigated the use of 3-MAX as a de-novo first pass catheter and as a rescue aspiration device following attempted thrombectomy with other devices. This is the first description of the first pass effect and successful recanalization rate of the 3-MAX catheter in de-novo vs. rescue use of this catheter.

METHODS

From January 2017 to January 2023, 84 patients underwent mechanical thrombectomy with use of a Penumbra 3MAX aspiration catheter at our comprehensive stroke center. Patient charts were retrospectively reviewed. Primary efficacy outcome was successful recanalization following mechanical thrombectomy. Primary safety outcome was intracerebral hemorrhage.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients underwent MT with the 3MAX device. It was used as a de novo catheter in 27(32.1%) and as a rescue catheter in 57(67.9%) patients. 35(41.6%) patients achieved angiographic TICI grade ≥ 2c. De novo 3MAX use led to 68.18% successful recanalization and rescue use led to 72.22% recanalization (p = 0.67) as measured by TICI score of 2c or better. Parenchymal intracerebral hemorrhages (PH) were present in 8 patients (9.5%).

CONCLUSION

The Penumbra 3MAX catheter is safe and effective when used as a first pass or a rescue device in mechanical thrombectomy. We found similar rates of successful recanalization and minimal hemorrhagic risk when comparing the 3MAX as a rescue or de novo aspiration catheter.

Effect of incomplete reperfusion patterns on clinical outcome: insights from the ESCAPE-NA1 trial

BACKGROUND

Incomplete reperfusion (IR) after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) can be a consequence of residual occlusion, no-reflow phenomenon, or collateral counterpressure. Data on the impact of these phenomena on clinical outcome are limited.

METHODS

Patients from the ESCAPE-NA1 trial with IR (expanded Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) 2b) were compared with those with complete or near-complete reperfusion (eTICI 2c-3) on the final angiography run. Final runs were assessed for (a) an MT-accessible occlusion, or (b) a non-MT-accessible occlusion pattern. The primary clinical outcome was modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2 at 90 days. Our imaging outcome was infarction in IR territory on follow-up imaging. Unadjusted and adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were obtained.

RESULTS

Of 1105 patients, 443 (40.1%) with IR and 506 (46.1%) with complete or near-complete reperfusion were included. An MT-accessible occlusion was identified in 147/443 patients (33.2%) and a non-MT-accessible occlusion in 296/443 (66.8%). As compared with patients with near-complete/complete reperfusion, patients with IR had significantly lower chances of achieving mRS 0-2 at 90 days (aIRR 0.82, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.91). Rates of mRS 0-2 were lower in the MT-accessible occlusion group as compared with the non-MT-accessible occlusion pattern group (aIRR 0.71, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.83, and aIRR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.98, respectively). More patients with MT-accessible occlusion patterns developed infarcts in the non-reperfused territory as compared with patients with non-MT occlusion patterns (68.7% vs 46.3%).

CONCLUSION

IR was associated with worse clinical outcomes than near-complete/complete reperfusion. Two-thirds of our patients with IR had non-MT-accessible occlusion patterns which were associated with better clinical and imaging outcomes compared with those with MT-accessible occlusion patterns.

Mechanical thrombectomy in medium vessel occlusions using the novel aspiration Q catheters: an international multicenter experience

BACKGROUND

Medium vessel occlusions (MeVOs) comprise a large proportion of all stroke events. We performed a multicenter study of MIVI Q catheters, a novel design that optimizes suction forces without an increase in lumen diameter, for the treatment of MeVOs, aiming to evaluate its efficacy and safety.

METHODS

Databases of two US and two UK centers were retrospectively reviewed for MeVO patients (M2-M3, anterior cerebral artery (ACA), or posterior cerebral artery (PCA)) treated with Q catheters. Outcomes were assessed as successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score ≥2b), first pass effect (FPE), and modified FPE (mFPE) as single pass achieving mTICI ≥2c and mTICI≥2b, respectively, and 90 day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score.

RESULTS

69 patients were included (median age 71 years, IQR 56-82.5; 52.2% men). Median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at admission was 14, and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) was 9. Primary (without large vessel occlusion (LVO)) and secondary (with LVO) MeVOs represented 47.8% and 52.2% of cases, respectively. Q catheters used were Q3 (47.8%), Q4 (33.3%), Q5 (10.1%), and Q6 (8.7%). mTICI≥2b was achieved in 92.8% of patients, with FPE in 47.8%, and mFPE in 68.1%. Two (2.9%) intraprocedural complications (symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage) occurred. 50% (27/54) achieved an mRS score of ≤2 at the 90 day follow-up. The median NIHSS at admission was significantly higher in secondary than in primary MeVOs (19.5 vs 12, P=0.009). The rate of mRS ≤2 at 90 days was significantly higher in primary than in secondary MeVOs (77.3% vs 31.3%, P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of MeVO patients with Q catheters resulted in optimal angiographic and clinical outcomes. Although angiographic results were similar between primary and secondary MeVOs, the former had less severe presenting NIHSS and better outcomes at 90 days than the latter.

A deep learning method to identify and localize large-vessel occlusions from cerebral digital subtraction angiography

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

An essential step during endovascular thrombectomy is identifying the occluded arterial vessel on a cerebral digital subtraction angiogram (DSA). We developed an algorithm that can detect and localize the position of occlusions in cerebral DSA.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected cerebral DSAs from a single institution between 2018 and 2020 from 188 patients, 86 of whom suffered occlusions of the M1 and proximal M2 segments. We trained an ensemble of deep-learning models on fewer than 60 large-vessel occlusion (LVO)-positive patients. We evaluated the model on an independent test set and evaluated the truth of its predicted localizations using Intersection over Union and expert review.

RESULTS

On an independent test set of 166 cerebral DSA frames with an LVO prevalence of 0.19, the model achieved a specificity of 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90, 0.99), a precision of 0.7450 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.88), and a sensitivity of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.66, 0.91). The model correctly localized the LVO in at least one frame in 13 of the 14 LVO-positive patients in the test set. The model achieved a precision of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.52, 0.79), recall of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.46, 0.81), and a mean average precision of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.56, 0.91).

CONCLUSION

This work demonstrates that a deep learning strategy using a limited dataset can generate effective representations used to identify LVOs. Generating an expanded and more complete dataset of LVOs with obstructed LVOs is likely the best way to improve the model's ability to localize LVOs.

Prognostic value of recanalization attempts in endovascular therapy for M2 segment middle cerebral artery occlusions

BACKGROUND

There is growing evidence suggesting efficacy of endovascular therapy for M2 occlusions of the middle cerebral artery. More than one recanalization attempt is often required to achieve successful reperfusion in M2 occlusions, associated with general concerns about the safety of multiple maneuvers in these medium vessel occlusions.

AIM

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the number of recanalization attempts and functional outcomes in M2 occlusions in comparison with large vessel occlusions (LVO).

METHODS

Retrospective multicenter cohort study of patients who underwent endovascular therapy for primary M2 occlusions. Patients were enrolled in the German Stroke Registry at 1 of 25 comprehensive stroke centers between 2015 and 2021. The study cohort was subdivided into patients with unsuccessful reperfusion (mTICI 0-2a) and successful reperfusion (mTICI 2b-3) at first, second, third, fourth, or ⩾fifth recanalization attempt. Primary outcome was 90-day functional independence defined as modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2. Safety outcome was the occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Internal carotid artery or M1 occlusions were defined as LVO and served as comparison group.

RESULTS

A total of 1078 patients with M2 occlusion were included. Successful reperfusion was observed in 87.1% and 90-day functional independence in 51.9%. The rate of functional independence decreased gradually with increasing number of recanalization attempts (p < 0.001). In both M2 occlusions and LVO, successful reperfusion within three attempts was associated with greater odds of functional independence, while success at ⩾fourth attempt was not. Patients with ⩾4 attempts exhibited higher rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in M2 occlusions (6.5% vs 2.7%, p = 0.02) and LVO (7.2% vs 3.5%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests a clinical benefit of successful reperfusion within three recanalization attempts in endovascular therapy for M2 occlusions, which was similar in LVO. Our findings reduce concerns about the risk-benefit ratio of multiple attempts in M2 medium vessel occlusions.

DATA ACCESS STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available on reasonable request after approval of the German Stroke Registry (GSR) steering committee.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03356392.

Benefit of endovascular treatment for primary versus secondary medium vessel occlusion: A multi-center experience

AIMS

This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and safety of endovascular treatment (EVT) in patients with primary versus secondary medium vessel occlusion (MeVO).

METHODS

From the endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke in the China registry, we collected consecutive patients with MeVO who received EVT. The primary endpoint was a good outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0 to 2 at 90 days.

RESULTS

154 patients were enrolled in the final analysis, including 74 primary MeVO and 80 secondary MeVO. A good outcome at 90 days was achieved in 42 (56.8%) patients with primary MeVO and 33 (41.3%) patients with secondary MeVO. There was a higher probability of good outcomes in patients with the primary vs secondary MeVO (adjusted odds ratio, 2.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 4.46; p = 0.04). There were no significant differences in secondary and safety outcomes between MeVO groups. In the multivariable analysis, baseline ASPECTS (p = 0.001), final modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score (p = 0.01), and any ICH (p = 0.03) were significantly associated with good outcomes in primary MeVO patients, while baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (p = 0.002), groin puncture to recanalization time (p = 0.02), and early neurological improvement (p < 0.001) were factors associated with good outcome in secondary MeVO patients.

CONCLUSION

In MeVO patients who received EVT, there was a higher likelihood of poor outcomes in patients with secondary versus primary MeVO.

Endovascular Treatment of Medium Vessel Occlusion Stroke

Approximately one-third of acute ischemic strokes with an identifiable vessel occlusion are caused by medium vessel occlusion (MeVO), that is, nonlarge vessel occlusions that are potentially amenable to endovascular treatment (EVT). Management of patients with MeVO is challenging in many ways: detecting MeVOs can be challenging, particularly for inexperienced physicians, and in busy clinical routine, MeVOs, therefore, remain sometimes undiagnosed. While the clinical course of MeVO stroke with medical management, including intravenous thrombolysis, is by no means, benign, it is more favorable compared with large vessel occlusion. At the same time, EVT complication rates are higher, and thus, the marginal benefit of EVT beyond best medical management is expected to be smaller and more challenging to detect if it were present. Several randomized controlled trials are currently underway to investigate whether and to what degree patients with MeVO may benefit from EVT and will soon provide robust data for evidence-based MeVO EVT decision-making. In this review, we discuss different ways of defining MeVOs, strategies to optimize MeVO detection on imaging, and considerations for EVT decision-making in the setting of MeVO stroke. We discuss the technical challenges related to MeVO EVT and conclude with an overview of currently ongoing MeVO EVT trials.

Safety and efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy for primary and secondary MeVO

BACKGROUND

Medium-vessel occlusions (MeVO) are emerging as a new target for endovascular treatment (EVT). Primary MeVO occur de novo, while secondary MeVO arise from large vessel occlusion (LVO) through clot migration or fragmentation - spontaneously, following intravenous thrombolysis or EVT. We aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of EVT in primary and EVT-induced secondary MeVO.

METHODS

Retrospective single-center study on consecutive EVT-treated acute ischemic stroke, from 2019-to-2021. We considered: (1) exclusive-LVO, patients with LVO and - in case of residual distal occlusion - no rescue endovascular procedure; (2) primary MeVO: initial A2, A3, M2 non-dominant, M3, P2, P3 occlusions; (3) EVT-induced secondary MeVO, presenting LVO with subsequent (treated) EVT-induced MeVO. We compared (univariable/multivariable logistic regression) EVT efficacy (eTICI≥2b, 3-month modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2) and safety (EVT-complications [vessel dissection, perforation, persistent-SAH], symptomatic ICH) in all MeVO versus exclusive-LVO, primary MeVO versus exclusive-LVO, EVT-induced secondary MeVO versus exclusive-LVO and EVT-induced secondary MeVO versus primary MeVO.

RESULTS

We included 335 patients: 221 (66.0 %) exclusive-LVO and 114 (34.0 %) MeVO (55 [48.2 %] primary, 59 [51.8 %] secondary). Compared to exclusive-LVO, primary MeVO had higher rates of EVT complications (aOR 3.77 [95%CI 1.58-9.00],p=0.003), lower rates of eTICI≥2b (aOR 0.32 [95%CI 0.12-0.88],p=0.027) and mRS 0-2 (aOR 0.28 [95%CI 0.13-0.63],p=0.002). EVT-induced secondary MeVO had no major differences in efficacy and safety outcomes compared to exclusive-LVO, but a better mRS 0-2 (aOR 8.00 [95%CI 2.12-30.17],p=0.002) compared to primary MeVO.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary and EVT-induced secondary MeVO showed different safety/efficacy EVT-related profiles. Dedicated randomized data are needed to identify the best acute reperfusion strategy in the two categories.

Current and future trends in acute ischemic stroke treatment: direct-to-angiography suite, middle vessel occlusion, large core, and minor strokes

Since the publication of the landmark thrombectomy trials in 2015, the field of endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke has been rapidly growing. The very low number needed to treat to provide functional benefits shown by the initial randomized trials has led clinicians and investigators to seek to translate the benefits of endovascular therapy to other patient subgroups. Even if the treatment effect is diminished, currently available data has provided sufficient information to extend endovascular therapy to large infarct core patients. Recently, published data have also shown that sophisticated imaging is not necessary for late time- window patients. As a result, further research into patient selection and the stroke pathway now focuses on dramatically reducing door-to-groin times and improving outcomes by circumventing classical imaging paradigms altogether and employing a direct-to-angio suite approach for selected large vessel occlusion patients in the early time window. While the results of this approach mainly concern patients with severe deficits, there are further struggles to provide evidence of the efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment in minor stroke and large vessel occlusion, as well as in patients with middle vessel occlusions. The current lack of good quality data regarding these patients provides significant challenges for accurately selecting potential candidates for endovascular treatment. However, current and future randomized trials will probably elucidate the efficacy of endovascular treatment in these patient populations.

Contemporary Methods for Detection and Intervention of Distal Medium and Small Vessel Occlusions

The efficacy of using mechanical thrombectomy for proximal large vessel occlusions has been demonstrated in multiple large-scale trials and has further raised the question of its potential utility for distal medium and small vessel occlusions (DMSVOs). Their longer, more tortuous course and smaller corresponding vascular territories render a significant challenge for detection and intervention. The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive overview of the current imaging and endovascular intervention options for DMSVOs and review the current works in the literature. Compared with traditional computed tomography angiography (CTA) and CT perfusion, recent advances such as multiphase CTA and maps derived from the time-to-maximum parameter coupled with artificial intelligence have demonstrated increased sensitivity for the detection of DMSVOs. Furthermore, newer generations of mini stent retrievers and thromboaspiration devices have allowed for the access and navigation of smaller and more fragile distal arteries. Preliminary studies have suggested that mechanical thrombectomy using this newer generation of devices is both safe and feasible in distal medium-sized vessels, such as M2. However, endovascular intervention utilizing such contemporary methods and devices must be balanced at the discretion of operator experience and favorable vascular anatomy. Further large-scale multicenter clinical trials are warranted to elucidate the indications for as well as to strengthen the safety and efficacy of this approach.

A review of acute ischemic stroke caused by distal, medium vessel occlusions

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to distal, medium vessel occlusion (DMVO) is increasingly recognized as the next frontier for mechanical thrombectomy. Distal, medium vessel occlusions are typically defined as an occlusion in the following arteries: anterior cerebral artery, M2-M4 segments of the middle cerebral artery, posterior cerebral artery, posterior inferior cerebellar artery, anterior inferior cerebellar artery, and superior cerebellar artery. It is estimated that 25-40% of all AIS is due to DMVO. Because of the large burden of DMVO, the frequency of literature published regarding these occlusions has greatly increased in recent years. Furthermore, treatment modalities have been created specifically for DMVOs. Due to the rapidly evolving literature on this topic, remaining up to date on DMVO definitions, anatomy, management, imaging, and clinical course is difficult. In this review article, we synthesized existing literature regarding the aforementioned topics and discussed future directions.

Thrombectomy versus Medical Management for Isolated Anterior Cerebral Artery Stroke: An International Multicenter Registry Study

Background Evidence supporting a potential benefit of thrombectomy for distal medium vessel occlusions (DMVOs) of the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) is, to the knowledge of the authors, unknown. Purpose To compare the clinical and safety outcomes between mechanical thrombectomy (MT) and best medical treatment (BMT) with or without intravenous thrombolysis for primary isolated ACA DMVOs. Materials and Methods Treatment for Primary Medium Vessel Occlusion Stroke, or TOPMOST, is an international, retrospective, multicenter, observational registry of patients treated for DMVO in daily practice. Patients treated with thrombectomy or BMT alone for primary ACA DMVO distal to the A1 segment between January 2013 and October 2021 were analyzed and compared by one-to-one propensity score matching (PSM). Early outcome was measured by the median improvement of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores at 24 hours. Favorable functional outcome was defined as modified Rankin scale scores of 0-2 at 90 days. Safety was assessed by the occurrence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and mortality. Results Of 154 patients (median age, 77 years; quartile 1 [Q1] to quartile 3 [Q3], 66-84 years; 80 men; 94 patients with MT; 60 patients with BMT) who met the inclusion criteria, 110 patients (median age, 76 years; Q1-Q3, 67-83 years; 50 men; 55 patients with MT; 55 patients with BMT) were matched. DMVOs were in A2 (82 patients; 53%), A3 (69 patients; 45%), and A3 (three patients; 2%). After PSM, the median 24-hour NIHSS point decrease was -2 (Q1-Q3, -4 to 0) in the thrombectomy and -1 (Q1-Q3, -4 to 1.25) in the BMT cohort (P = .52). Favorable functional outcome (MT vs BMT, 18 of 37 [49%] vs 19 of 39 [49%], respectively; P = .99) and mortality (MT vs BMT, eight of 37 [22%] vs 12 of 39 [31%], respectively; P = .36) were similar in both groups. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in three (2%) of 154 patients. Conclusion Thrombectomy appears to be a safe and technically feasible treatment option for primary isolated anterior cerebral artery occlusions in the A2 and A3 segment with clinical outcomes similar to best medical treatment with and without intravenous thrombolysis. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Zhu and Wang in this issue.

The Benefit of a Complete over a Successful Reperfusion Decreases with Time

OBJECTIVE

Time from stroke onset to reperfusion (TSOR) is strongly associated with outcomes after endovascular treatment. A near-to-complete or complete reperfusion (modified Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia [mTICI] 2c-3) is associated with improved outcomes compared with a successful reperfusion (mTICI 2b). However, it is unknown whether this association remains stable as TSOR increases. Therefore, we sought to investigate the association between TSOR and outcomes according to the reperfusion status.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke registry, a prospective, observational, multicentric study of acute ischemic stroke patients treated with endovascular treatment in 21 centers in France. We included patients with anterior occlusions (M1, internal carotid artery, tandem), with a known time of symptom onset. Outcomes were early neurological improvement at 24 hours and favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale between 0 and 2) at 90 days.

RESULTS

Overall, 4,444 patients were analyzed. Compared with a mTICI 2b, a mTICI 2c-3 at 1 hour was associated with higher mean marginal probabilities of early neurological improvement (25.6%, 95% CI 11.7-39.5, p = 0.0003) and favorable outcome (15.2%, 95% CI 3.0-27.4, p = 0.0143), and progressively declined with TSOR. The benefit of a mTICI 2c-3 over a mTICI 2b was no longer significant regarding the rates of early neurological improvement and favorable outcome after a TSOR of 414 and 344 minutes, respectively.

INTERPRETATION

The prognostic value of a complete over a successful reperfusion progressively declined with time, and no difference regarding the rates of favorable outcome was observed between a complete and successful reperfusion beyond 5.7 hours. ANN NEUROL 2023.

Worldwide anaesthesia use during endovascular treatment for medium vessel occlusion stroke

INTRODUCTION

The optimal anaesthesia approach for endovascular treatment (EVT) in acute ischaemic stroke is currently unknown. In stroke due to medium vessel occlusions (MeVO), the occluded vessels are particularly small and more difficult to access, especially in restless or uncooperative patients. In these patients, general anaesthesia (GA) may be preferred by physicians to prevent complications due to patient movement. We investigated physicians' approaches to anaesthesia during EVT for MeVO stroke.

METHODS

In a worldwide, case-based, online survey, physicians' preferred anaesthesia approach during EVT for MeVO stroke was categorized as "initial GA", "initial GA if necessary" (depending on patient cooperation), "no initial GA, but conversion if necessary" (start with local anaesthesia or conscious sedation), and "no GA". Preferred anaesthesia approaches were reported overall and stratified by physician and patient characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 366 survey participants provided 1464 responses to 4 primary MeVO EVT case-scenarios. One-third of responses (489/1464 [33%]) favoured no initial GA, but conversion if necessary. Both initial GA and initial GA if necessary were preferred in 368/1464 (25%) of responses respectively. No GA was favoured in 244/1464 (17%). Occlusion location, respondent specialization (interventional neuroradiology), higher age, and female respondent sex were significantly associated with GA preference. GA was more often used in Europe than in other parts of the world (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Anaesthesia approaches in MeVO EVT vary across world regions and patient and physician factors. Most physicians in this survey preferred to start with local anaesthesia or conscious sedation and convert to GA if necessary.

Perceived Limits of Endovascular Treatment for Secondary Medium-Vessel-Occlusion Stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Thrombus embolization during mechanical thrombectomy occurs in up to 9% of cases, making secondary medium vessel occlusions of particular interest to neurointerventionalists. We sought to gain insight into the current endovascular treatment approaches for secondary medium vessel occlusion stroke in an international case-based survey because there are currently no clear recommendations for endovascular treatment in these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Survey participants were presented with 3 cases involving secondary medium vessel occlusions, each consisting of 3 case vignettes with changes in the patient's neurologic status (improvement, no change, unable to assess). Multivariable logistic regression analyses clustered by the respondent's identity were used to assess factors influencing the decision to treat.

RESULTS

In total, 366 physicians (56 women, 308 men, 2 undisclosed) from 44 countries provided 3294 responses to 9 scenarios. Most (54.1%, 1782/3294) were in favor of endovascular treatment. Participants were more likely to treat occlusions in the anterior M2/3 (74.3%; risk ratio = 2.62; 95% CI, 2.27-3.03) or A3 (59.7%; risk ratio = 2.11; 95% CI, 1.83-2.42) segment compared with the M3/4 segment (28.3%; reference). Physicians were less likely to pursue endovascular treatment in patients who showed neurologic improvement than in patients with an unchanged neurologic deficit (49.9% versus 57.0% responses in favor of endovascular treatment, respectively; risk ratio = 0.88, 95% CI, 0.83-0.92). Interventionalists and more experienced physicians were more likely to treat secondary medium vessel occlusions.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians' willingness to treat secondary medium vessel occlusions endovascularly is limited and varies per occlusion location and change in neurologic status. More evidence on the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment for secondary medium vessel occlusion stroke is needed.

Patient-Relevant Deficits Dictate Endovascular Thrombectomy Decision-Making in Patients with Low NIHSS Scores with Medium-Vessel Occlusion Stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There is a paucity of evidence regarding the safety of endovascular treatment for patients with acute ischemic stroke due to primary medium-vessel occlusion. The aim of this study was to examine the willingness among stroke physicians to perform endovascular treatment in patients with mild-yet-disabling deficits due to medium-vessel occlusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In an international cross-sectional survey consisting of 7 primary medium-vessel occlusion case scenarios, participants were asked whether the presence of personally disabling deficits would influence their decision-making for endovascular treatment despite the patients having low NIHSS scores (<6). Decision rates were calculated on the basis of physician characteristics. Univariable logistic regression clustered by respondent and scenario identity was performed.

RESULTS

Three hundred sixty-six participants from 44 countries provided 2562 answers to the 7 medium-vessel occlusion scenarios included in this study. In scenarios in which the deficit was relevant to the patient's profession, 56.9% of respondents opted to perform immediate endovascular treatment compared with 41.0% when no information regarding the patient's profession was provided (risk ratio = 1.39, P < .001). The largest effect sizes were seen for female participants (risk ratio = 1.68; 95% CI, 1.35-2.09), participants older than 60 years of age (risk ratio = 1.61; 95% CI, 1.23-2.10), those with more experience in neurointervention (risk ratio = 1.60; 95% CI, 1.24-2.06), and those who personally performed >100 endovascular treatments per year (risk ratio = 1.63; 95% CI, 1.22-2.17).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of a patient-relevant deficit in low-NIHSS acute ischemic stroke due to medium-vessel occlusion is an important factor for endovascular treatment decision-making. This may have relevance for the conduct and interpretation of low-NIHSS endovascular treatment in randomized trials.

Willingness to randomize primary medium vessel occlusions for endovascular treatment

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Patients with acute ischemic stroke due to medium vessel occlusion (MeVO) make up a substantial part of the acute stroke population, though guidelines currently do not recommend endovascular treatment (EVT) for them. A growing body of evidence suggests that EVT is effective in MeVOs, including observational data but no randomized studies. We aimed to explore willingness of physicians worldwide to randomize MeVO stroke patients into a hypothetical trial comparing EVT in addition to best medical management versus best medical management only.

METHODS

In an international cross-sectional survey among stroke physicians, participants were presented with 4 cases of primary MeVOs (6 scenarios each). Each subsequent scenario changed one key patient characteristic compared to the previous one, and asked survey participants whether they would be willing to randomize the described patient. Overall, physician- and scenario-specific decision rates were calculated. Multivariable logistic regression with clustering by respondent was performed to assess factors influencing the decision to randomize.

RESULTS

Overall, 366 participants (56 women) from 44 countries provided 8784 answers to 24 MeVO case scenarios. The majority of responses (78.3%) were in favor of randomizing. Most physicians were willing to accept patients transferred for EVT from a primary center (82%) and the majority of these (76.5%) were willing to randomize these patients after transfer. Patient age > 65 years, A3 occlusion, small core volume, and patient intravenous alteplase eligibility significantly influenced the physician's decision to randomize (adjOR 1.24, 95%CI 1.13-1.36; adjOR 1.17, 95%CI 1.01-1.34; adjOR 0.98, 95%CI 0.97-0.99 and adjOR 1.38, 95%CI 1.21-1.57, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Most physicians in this survey were willing to randomize acute MeVO stroke patients irrespective of patient characteristics into a trial comparing EVT in addition to best medical management versus best medical management only, suggesting there is clinical equipoise.

Distinct intra-arterial clot localization affects tissue-level collaterals and venous outflow profiles

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Arterial clot localization affects collateral flow to ischemic brain in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO). We determined the association between vessel occlusion locations, tissue-level collaterals (TLC), and venous outflow (VO) profiles and their impact on good functional outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of consecutive AIS-LVO patients who underwent thrombectomy triage. Baseline computed tomographic angiography (CTA) was used to localize vessel occlusion, which was dichotomized into proximal vessel occlusion (PVO; internal carotid artery and proximal first segment of the middle cerebral artery [M1]) and distal vessel occlusion (DVO; distal M1 and M2), and to assess collateral scores. TLC were assessed on computed tomographic perfusion data using the hypoperfusion intensity ratio. VO was determined on baseline CTA by the cortical vein opacification score. Primary outcomes were favorable VO and TLC; secondary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale after 90 days.

RESULTS

A total of 649 patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 376 patients (58%) had a PVO and 273 patients (42%) had a DVO. Multivariate ordinal logistic regression showed that DVO predicted favorable TLC (odds ratio [OR] = 1.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.24-2.52, p = 0.002) and favorable VO (OR = 7.2, 95% CI = 5.2-11.9, p < 0.001). DVO (OR = 3.4, 95% CI = 2.1-5.6, p < 0.001), favorable VO (OR = 6.4, 95% CI = 3.8-10.6, p < 0.001), and favorable TLC (OR = 3.2, 95% CI = 2-5.3, p < 0.001), but not CTA collaterals (OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.60-1.91, p = 0.813), were predictors of good functional outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

DVO in AIS-LVO patients correlates with favorable TLC and VO profiles, which are associated with good functional outcome.

Thrombectomy for secondary distal, medium vessel occlusions of the posterior circulation: seeking complete reperfusion

BACKGROUND

Whether to approach distal occlusions endovascularly or not in medium-sized vessels secondary to proximal large vessel occlusion stroke remains unanswered.

OBJECTIVE

To investigates the technical feasibility and safety of thrombectomy for secondary posterior circulation distal, medium vessel occlusions (DMVO).

METHODS

TOPMOST (Treatment fOr Primary Medium vessel Occlusion STroke) is an international, retrospective, multicenter, observational registry of patients treated for distal cerebral artery occlusions. This study subanalysis endovascularly treated occlusions of the posterior cerebral artery in the P2 and P3 segment secondary preprocedural or periprocedural thrombus migration between January 2014 and June 2020. Technical feasibility was evaluated with the modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) scale. Procedural safety was assessed by the occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and intervention-related serious adverse events.

RESULTS

Among 71 patients with secondary posterior circulation DMVO who met the inclusion criteria, occlusions were present in 80.3% (57/71) located in the P2 segment and in 19.7% (14/71) in the P3 segment. Periprocedural migration occurred in 54.9% (39/71) and preprocedural migration in 45.1% (32/71) of cases. The first reperfusion attempt led in 38% (27/71) of all cases to mTICI 3. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, increased numbers of reperfusion attempts (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=0.39, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.88, p=0.009) and preprocedural migration (aOR=4.70, 95% CI,1.35 to 16.35, p=0.015) were significantly associated with mTICI 3. sICH occurred in 2.8% (2/71).

CONCLUSION

Thrombectomy for secondary posterior circulation DMVO seems to be safe and technically feasible. Even though thrombi that have migrated preprocedurally may be easier to retract, successful reperfusion can be achieved in the majority of patients with secondary DMVO of the P2 and P3 segment.

Thrombolytic strategies for ischemic stroke in the thrombectomy era

Twenty-five years ago, intravenous thrombolysis has revolutionized the care of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Since 2015, randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that mechanical thrombectomy improves functional outcome in stroke patients over intravenous thrombolysis alone. More recently, three randomized clinical trials have suggested that mechanical thrombectomy alone is noninferior to a combined strategy with both intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy. In the present review, we will present the last clinical and preclinical studies on the use of thrombolysis in stroke patients in the modern thrombectomy era. At the cost of a potential increased risk of hemorrhagic transformation, thrombolysis may promote arterial recanalization before thrombectomy, improve the rate of successful recanalization after thrombectomy, and restore microcirculation patency downstream of the main thrombus. Besides, new thrombolytic strategies targeting tissue-type plasminogen activator resistant thrombi are being developed, which could strengthen the beneficial effects of thrombolysis without carrying additional pro-hemorrhagic effects. For instance, tenecteplase has shown improved rate of recanalization compared with tissue-type plasminogen activator (alteplase). Beyond fibrinolysis, DNA- and von Willebrand factor-targeted thrombolytic strategies have shown promising results in experimental models of ischemic stroke. New combined strategies, improved thrombolytics, and dedicated clinical trials in selected patients are eagerly awaited to further improve functional outcome in stroke.

Factors associated with early reperfusion improvement after intra-arterial fibrinolytics as rescue for mechanical thrombectomy

Objective:

To identify factors associated with early angiographic reperfusion improvement (EARI) following intra-arterial fibrinolytics (IAF) after failed or incomplete mechanical thrombectomy (MT).

Methods:

A subset of patients treated with MT and IAF rescue after incomplete reperfusion included in the INFINITY (INtra-arterial FIbriNolytics In ThrombectomY) multicenter observational registry was analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with EARI. Heterogeneity of the clinical effect of EARI on functional independence (defined as modified Rankin Score ≤2) was tested with interaction terms.

Results:

A total of 228 patients (median age: 72 years, 44.1% female) received IAF as rescue for failed or incomplete MT and had a post-fibrinolytic angiographic control run available (50.9% EARI). A cardioembolic stroke origin (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.39–10.0) and shorter groin puncture to IAF intervals (aOR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71–0.95 per 15-min delay) were associated with EARI, while pre-interventional thrombolysis showed no association (aOR 1.15, 95% CI 0.59–2.26). The clinical benefit of EARI after IAF seemed more pronounced in patients without or only minor early ischemic changes (Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) ≥9, aOR 4.00, 95% CI 1.37–11.61) and was absent in patients with moderate to severe ischemic changes (ASPECTS ≤8, aOR 0.94, 95% CI 0.27–3.27, p for interaction: 0.095).

Conclusion:

Early rescue and a cardioembolic stroke origin were associated with more frequent EARI after IAF. The clinical effect of EARI seemed reduced in patients with already established infarcts. If confirmed, these findings can help to inform patient selection and inclusion criteria for randomized-controlled trials evaluating IAF as rescue after MT.

Factors influencing thrombectomy decision making for primary medium vessel occlusion stroke

BACKGROUND

We aimed to explore the preference of stroke physicians to treat patients with primary medium vessel occlusion (MeVO) stroke with immediate endovascular treatment (EVT) in an international cross-sectional survey, as there is no clear guideline recommendation for EVT in these patients.

METHODS

In the survey MeVO-Finding Rationales and Objectifying New Targets for IntervEntional Revascularization in Stroke (MeVO-FRONTIERS), participants were shown four cases of primary MeVOs (six scenarios per case) and asked whether they would treat those patients with EVT. Multivariable logistic regression with clustering by respondent was performed to assess factors influencing the decision to treat. Dominance analysis was performed to assess the influence of factors within the scenarios on decision making.

RESULTS

Overall, 366 participants (56 women; 15%) from 44 countries provided 8784 answers to 24 scenarios. Most physicians (59.2%) would treat patients immediately with EVT. Younger patient age (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.24, 99% CI 1.19 to 1.30), higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (IRR 1.69, 99% CI 1.57 to 1.82), and small core volume (IRR 1.35, 99% CI 1.24 to 1.46) were positively associated with the decision to treat with EVT. Interventionalists (IRR 1.26, 99% CI 1.01 to 1.56) were more likely to treat patients with MeVO immediately with EVT. In the dominance analysis, factors influencing the decision in favor of EVT were (in order of importance): baseline NIHSS, core volume, alteplase use, patients' age, and occlusion site.

CONCLUSIONS

Most physicians in this survey were interventionalists and would treat patients with MeVO stroke immediately with EVT. This finding supports the need for robust clinical evidence.

A review of endovascular treatment for medium vessel occlusion stroke

Medium-vessel occlusions (MeVOs), that is, occlusions of the M2/3 middle cerebral artery, A2/3 anterior cerebral artery, and P2/3 posterior cerebral artery segments, account for 25%-40% of all acute ischemic stroke cases. Clinical outcomes of MeVO stroke with intravenous thrombolysis, which is the current standard of care, are moderate at best. With improving imaging technologies and a growing literature, MeVOs are increasingly recognized as a target for endovascular treatment (EVT). For the time being, there is limited but promising evidence for the safety and efficacy of MeVO EVT, and many neurointerventionists are already routinely offering EVT for MeVO stroke, despite the lack of clear guideline recommendations. In this article, we review the evidence on endovascular treatment for MeVO stroke and summarize the available literature on current imaging strategies, commonly used EVT selection criteria, EVT techniques, and outcome assessment for MeVO stroke.