Kenton Award Lecture-Stroke Disparities Research: Learning From the Past, Planning for the Future

Understanding gender inequity in brain health outcomes: missed stroke as a case study for intersectionality

Recent attention into sex and gender-based inequities surrounding outcomes for brain health disorders has generated momentum toward addressing what has been called the "brain health gap." Importantly though, "women" are not uniform demographic group. In this perspective piece, we discuss misdiagnosis in stroke as an aspect of access and quality of care within brain health. Drawing on narrative data from a mixed methods study of young stroke survivors we suggest that while missed stroke isn't only an issue of gender, if we are going to understand gender-based gaps in access and navigation through stroke care, we have to understand how intersections of gender with age, ethnoracial identity, nationality, language, (dis)ability, and other aspects of social identity come together to create affordances as well as biases that contribute to stroke outcomes.

Was COVID-19 Associated With Worsening Inequities in Stroke Treatment and Outcomes?

Background COVID-19 stressed hospitals and may have disproportionately affected the stroke outcomes and treatment of Black and Hispanic individuals. Methods and Results This retrospective study used 100% Medicare Provider Analysis and Review file data from between 2016 and 2020. We used interrupted time series analyses to examine whether the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated disparities in stroke outcomes and reperfusion therapy. Among 1 142 560 hospitalizations for acute ischemic strokes, 90 912 (8.0%) were Hispanic individuals; 162 752 (14.2%) were non-Hispanic Black individuals; and 888 896 (77.8%) were non-Hispanic White individuals. The adjusted odds of mortality increased by 51% (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.51 [95% CI, 1.34-1.69]; P<0.001), whereas the rates of nonhome discharges decreased by 11% (aOR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.82-0.96]; P=0.003) for patients hospitalized during weeks when the hospital's proportion of patients with COVID-19 was >30%. The overall rates of motor deficits (P=0.25) did not increase, and the rates of reperfusion therapy did not decrease as the weekly COVID-19 burden increased. Black patients had lower 30-day mortality (aOR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.69-0.72]; P<0.001) but higher rates of motor deficits (aOR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.12-1.16]; P<0.001) than White individuals. Hispanic patients had lower 30-day mortality and similar rates of motor deficits compared with White individuals. There was no differential increase in adverse outcomes or reduction in reperfusion therapy among Black and Hispanic individuals compared with White individuals as the weekly COVID-19 burden increased. Conclusions This national study of Medicare patients found no evidence that the hospital COVID-19 burden exacerbated disparities in treatment and outcomes for Black and Hispanic individuals admitted with an acute ischemic stroke.

Health Equity and Actionable Disparities in Stroke: 2022 Update

There are stark inequities in stroke incidence, prevalence, care, and outcomes. This issue of Stroke features manuscripts from the third annual HEADS-UP (Health Equity and Actionable Disparities in Stroke: Understanding and Problem-Solving) symposium, which took place the day before the International Stroke Conference in February 2022. The 2022 HEADS-UP symposium focused on clinical trials to address stroke inequities. The 2022 Edgar J. Kenton III award was awarded to Moira Kapral. In Kenton Award Lecture-Stroke Disparities Research: Learning from the Past, Planning for the Future, Kapral details 10 key considerations for researchers interested in addressing inequities in stroke. These considerations provide an insightful, evidence-based roadmap for the future of stroke inequities research. In the article, Care Transition Interventions to Improve Stroke Outcomes, Reeves et al highlight barriers faced by historically disenfranchised populations navigating transitions in the stroke continuum of care; summarize clinical trials aimed at enhancing transitions in care, particularly in historically marginalized populations; and stress the importance of co-designing future interventions with patient populations to address inequities. In Telehealth Trials to Enhance Health Equity for Patients With Stroke, Sharrief et al detail how telehealth interventions have the potential to address inequities if they are implemented in a thoughtful manner, addressing the potential factors than can exacerbate a digital divide. Finally, in Polypill Programs to Prevent Stroke and Cut Costs in Low Income Countries: From Clinical Efficacy to Implementation, Sarfo et al review the evidence for polypill strategies in primary and secondary cardiovascular disease prevention in low- and middle-income countries, who bear the majority of the worldwide burden of stroke.