Blood Pressure Control Targets and Risk of Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events After Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Acute care bundles should be used for patients with intracerebral haemorrhage: An expert consensus statement

PURPOSE

Intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is the most devastating form of stroke and a major cause of disability. Clinical trials of individual therapies have failed to definitively establish a specific beneficial treatment. However, clinical trials of introducing care bundles, with multiple therapies provided in parallel, appear to clearly reduce morbidity and mortality. Currently, not enough patients receive these interventions in the acute phase.

METHODS

We convened an expert group to discuss best practices in ICH and to develop recommendations for bundled care that can be delivered in all settings that treat acute ICH, with a focus on European healthcare systems.

FINDINGS

In this consensus paper, we argue for widespread implementation of formalised care bundles in ICH, including specific metrics for time to treatment and criteria for the consideration of neurosurgical therapy.

DISCUSSION

There is an extraordinary opportunity to improve clinical care and clinical outcomes in this devastating disease. Substantial evidence already exists for a range of therapies that can and should be implemented now.

Relationship between resting heart rate and long-term outcomes in stabilized patients with myocardial infarction: A prospective community-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Resting heart rate (RHR) during hospitalization has been shown to be associated with adverse outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction (MI). This study aimed to evaluate the long-term prognostic effect of RHR during the stable phase after MI in post-MI patients.

METHODS

Patients who had prior or new-onset MI and RHR measurements during the stable period after MI between 2006 and 2018 in the community-based Kailuan Study were enrolled. RHR was divided into four groups based on quartiles. Cox regression analysis was used to analyze the association of RHR with primary composite outcome of all-cause death, hospitalization for heart failure (HF), stroke, and recurrent MI and its components.

RESULTS

A total of 4447 post-MI patients were included. During a median follow-up of 7.5 years, 1813 patients (40.8%) developed primary outcomes. Compared to RHR ≤67 bpm, patients with 72 < RHR ≤80 bpm and RHR >80 bpm had increased risks of primary outcome, with adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 1.23 (1.08-1.40) and 1.35 (1.18-1.55), respectively. The risk of primary outcome increased by 12% (1.07-1.17) for each 10-bpm increase in RHR. Similar results were observed in all-cause death and hospitalization for HF. Restricted cubic splines revealed a linear relationship between RHR and primary outcome, all-cause death, and hospitalization for HF (P for nonlinearity >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

RHR during the stable phase after MI was an independent predictor for primary outcome and all-cause death in post-MI patients, and RHR >72 bpm was associated with increased risk for primary outcome and all-cause death.

Association of LDL-cholesterol <1.8 mmol/L and statin use with the recurrence of intracerebral hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Recent intensive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering trials, including FOURIER, ODYSSEY OUTCOMES, and Treat Stroke to Target (TST) trials, have mostly refuted the concern surrounding statin use, LDL-C lowering, and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) risk. However, the results from these trials may not be fully applied to ICH survivors, as the populations studied were mainly patients without prior ICH, in whom the inherent ICH risk is more than 10 times lower than that of ICH survivors. Although available literature on statin use after ICH has demonstrated no excess risk of recurrent ICH, other potential factors that may modify ICH risk, especially hypertension control and ICH etiology, have not generally been considered. Notably, data on LDL-C levels following ICH are lacking.

AIMS

We aim to investigate the association between LDL-C levels and statin use with ICH risk among ICH survivors, and to determine whether the risk differed with patients' characteristics, especially ICH etiology.

METHODS

Follow-up data of consecutive spontaneous ICH survivors enrolled in the University of Hong Kong prospective stroke registry from 2011 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. ICH etiology was classified as cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) using the modified Boston criteria or hypertensive arteriopathy, while the mean follow-up LDL-C value was categorized as <1.8 or ⩾1.8 mmol/L. The primary endpoint was recurrent ICH. The association of LDL-C level and statin use with recurrent ICH was determined using multivariable Cox regression. Pre-specified subgroup analyses were performed, including based on ICH etiology and statin prescription. Follow-up blood pressure was included in all the regression models.

RESULTS

In 502 ICH survivors (mean age = 64.2 ± 13.5 years, mean follow-up LDL-C = 2.2 ± 0.6 mmol/L, 28% with LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L), 44 had ICH recurrence during a mean follow-up of 5.9 ± 2.8 years. Statin use after ICH was not associated with recurrent ICH (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) = 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.57-2.00). The risk of ICH recurrence was increased for follow-up LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L (AHR = 1.99, 95% CI = 1.06-3.73). This association was predominantly observed in ICH attributable to CAA (AHR = 2.52, 95% CI = 1.06-5.99) and non-statin users (AHR = 2.91, 95% CI = 1.08-7.86).

CONCLUSION

The association between post-ICH LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L and recurrent ICH was predominantly observed in CAA patients and those with intrinsically low LDL-C (non-statin users). While statins can be safely prescribed in ICH survivors, LDL-C targets should be individualized and caution must be exercised in CAA patients.

Association of Statin Use With Risk of Stroke Recurrence After Intracerebral Hemorrhage

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Survivors of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) may have indications for statin therapy. The effect of statins on the risk of subsequent hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke (IS) in this setting is uncertain. We sought to determine the risk of any stroke (ischemic stroke, IS or recurrent ICH), IS, and recurrent ICH associated with statin use among ICH survivors.

METHODS

Using the Danish Stroke Registry, we identified all patients admitted to a hospital in Denmark (population 5.8 million) with a first-ever ICH between January 2003 and December 2021 who were aged 50 years or older and survived >30 days. Patients were followed up until August 2022. Within this cohort, we conducted 3 nested case-control analyses for any stroke, IS, and recurrent ICH. We matched controls for age, sex, time since first-ever ICH, and history of prior IS. The primary exposure was statin use before or on the date of subsequent stroke or the equivalent date in matched controls. Using conditional logistic regression, we calculated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for any stroke, IS, and recurrent ICH associated with statin exposure.

RESULTS

We identified 1,959 patients with any stroke (women 45.3%; mean [SD] age, 72.6 [9.7] years) who were matched to 7,400 controls; 1,073 patients with IS (women 42.0%; mean [SD] age, 72.4 [10.0] years) who were matched to 4,035 controls and 984 patients with recurrent ICH (women 48.7%; mean [SD] age, 72.7 [9.2] years) who were matched to 3,755 controls. Statin exposure was associated with a lower risk of both any stroke (cases 38.6%, controls 41.1%; aOR 0.88; 95% CI 0.78-0.99) and IS (cases 39.8%, controls 41.8%, aOR 0.79; 95% CI 0.67-0.92), but was not associated with recurrent ICH risk (cases 39.1%, controls 40.8%, aOR 1.05; 95% CI 0.88-1.24).

DISCUSSION

Exposure to statins was not associated with an increased risk of recurrent ICH but was associated with a lower risk of any stroke, largely due to a lower risk of IS. Confirmation of these findings in randomized trials is needed.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class III evidence that statin use in patients with ICH is associated with a lower risk of any stroke and IS and not with increased risk of recurrent ICH.

Secondary prevention after intracerebral haemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) has high mortality in the acute phase and poor functional outcome in the majority of survivors. ICH recurrence is a major determinant of long-term prognosis and is the most feared complication of antithrombotic treatment. On the other hand, ICH patients are at high risk of future ischaemic vascular events.

METHODS

This narrative review provides a critical analysis of the current knowledge on the topic. We performed a Pubmed search with the following terms 'intracerebral haemorrhage', 'stroke', 'outcome', 'secondary prevention', 'anticoagulation' and 'atrial fibrillation', including only English written studies with no time restrictions.

RESULTS

Blood pressure management is the cornerstone of secondary ICH prevention, regardless of ICH location or underlying cerebral small vessel disease. Resumption of antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy is often challenging, with limited evidence from randomized trials. Clinical and imaging predictors can inform the stratification of ICH recurrence risk and might identify patients at very high probability of future haemorrhagic events. This narrative review provides a summary of the main diagnostic tools and therapeutic strategies available for secondary prevention in ICH survivors.

CONCLUSION

Appropriate recognition and treatment of modifiable risk factors for ICH recurrence might improve outcomes in ICH survivors. Ongoing randomized trials might provide novel insights and improve long-term management.