Upfront dilution of ferritin samples to reduce hook effect, improve turnaround time and reduce costs

Diagnostic pitfalls in assessment of ferritin following CAR-T-cell therapy: Understanding the hook effect

The hook effect is a well-described but clinically underappreciated immunoassay interference, where a falsely lowered result is caused by analyte excess. We describe a situation in which ferritin immunoassay results from a 27-year-old female with immune effector cell-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome were more than 1000 times lower at a reference laboratory than those determined in-house after dilution. This case underscores the importance for clinical care providers to be aware of the impact of the hook effect on ferritin measurements, and to promptly communicate with the laboratory when there are discrepancies between clinical symptoms and test results.

An improved method for rapid identification of hook effect samples in HBsAg quantitative assay

Quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen assay is widely used for diagnosis of hepatitis B virus infection; however, specimens with high levels of the antigen can cause false-negative results (Hook effect), which needs to be resolved. The hook effect samples and non-hook effect samples were detected on the LiCA® 500 instrument using three methods, viz., 1, 2, and 3. Method 1, the currently used procedure, was performed in two steps with a total reaction time of 25 min in a final volume of 250 µL: first incubation was with two reagents for 15 min and then with one other reagent for 10 min. In Method 2, all three reagents were added in one step with a final volume of 250 µL, and the total reaction time was still 25 min. In Method 3, the improved method, all three reagents were added in one step while the final volume was only 130 µL and the total reaction time was only 1 min. Signal values of the non-hook effect samples obtained using Method 2 were significantly lower than those with Method 1, showing competitive inhibition. The hook effect samples tested with Method 2 approximated those obtained using Method 1. Method 3 took 1 min and differentiated hook effect samples successfully, similar to the results with Method 2 which took 25 min. Changing the timing of one reagent addition and incubation time in Method 3 provided a rapid and effective method for the identification of hook effect. The results were more clearly distinguishable due to the phenomenon of competitive inhibition. Method 3 can be considered an improvement on the chemiluminescence platform.

Falsely decreased ferritin concentrations in two patients with haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: A case report

The high-dose hook effect, or prozone effect, can lead to negative or falsely lowered plasma ferritin results. Here, cases of a 16-year-old boy and a 70-year-old woman with haemophagocytic lymphohystiocytosis with extremely high concentrations of plasma ferritin (387,000 μg/L and 138,000 μg/L, respectively) are presented. In both cases, falsely lowered ferritin results were reported without any analyser flag. This article emphasizes the importance of recognition of the high-dose hook effect, since a watertight solution is lacking.

High-dose HOOK effect in urinary DcR2 assay in patients with chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Urinary DcR2 (uDcR2) is a biomarker for the early detection the tubulointerstitial injury (TII) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), but the high-dose hook effect may lead to falsely low or even negative results when using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). This study aimed to investigate if the high-dose hook effect exists with ELISA testing, and to uncover a potential approach for reducing this effect.

METHODS

72 CKD patients were recruited and categorized into four groups based on TII scores. uDcR2 was measured in undiluted and serially diluted (two-, four-, eight- and 16-fold dilutions) urine using an ELISA kit. The results from the assay were normalized to urinary creatinine. We evaluated the correlation between uDcR2/cre levels at different dilutions and renal histological parameters. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to examine the value of uDcR2/cre for predicting TII.

RESULTS

uDcR2/cre levels in the undiluted urine were significantly higher in patients with CKD than those in the control. However, higher TII scores did not yield higher levels of uDcR2/cre in the undiluted urine. After serial dilution, uDcR2/cre levels were highest with the four-fold dilution. A positive correlation was found between uDcR2/cre levels at different dilutions and TII scores, with the highest correlation coefficient and the largest AUC being observed at the four-fold dilution.

CONCLUSIONS

The high-dose hook effect was apparent during ELISA testing of uDcR2 in CKD patients, yet dilution of the urine samples neutralized this effect. However, the use of a four-fold dilution of urine for uDcR2/cre testing may eliminate the high-dose hook effect and make it possible to effectively monitor the severity of TII in CKD patients.