A case of IgE myeloma transformed into IgE-producing plasma cell leukaemia

IgE Plasma Cell Leukemia Harboring t(11;14) and 1q Amplification

IgE plasma cell neoplasm is the rarest subtype of plasma cell neoplasms and is known for its poor prognosis and high incidence of t(11;14). However, t(11;14) has been classified as a standard-risk rather than high-risk cytogenetic abnormality in multiple myeloma. We have been unable to explain the discrepancy that the hallmark of IgE plasma cell neoplasm with a poor prognosis is a standard-risk cytogenetic abnormality. Here, we report a case of IgE primary plasma cell leukemia with extramedullary lesions of the liver, stomach, and lymph nodes. Plasma cell infiltration was pathologically confirmed in each organ. Cytogenetic analysis of plasma cells revealed t(11;14) and amplification of 1q21. Chemotherapy, with immunomodulatory imide drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and CD38 antibodies, was unsuccessful. In IgE plasma cell neoplasm, coexistence of other cytogenetic abnormalities with t(11;14) may be important. Investigating the presence of cytogenetic abnormalities coexisting with t(11;14) is not only useful for evaluating prognosis but also important for understanding the pathogenesis of the disease. Recently, venetoclax, an oral BCL2 inhibitor, has demonstrated promising efficacy in plasma cell neoplasm patients harboring t(11;14). Development of an effective venetoclax-based regimen for treating aggressive IgE plasma cell neoplasm with t(11;14) is expected.

Defects and countermeasures in laboratory diagnosis of rare IgE multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

IgE multiple myeloma (MM) is a rare subtype of MM that is easily misdiagnosed. We report a rare case of IgE-MM and investigate the application of the SLiM-CRAB criteria to screen for high-risk smoldering MM (SMM) patients, so as to summarize the causes and methods used to prevent missed diagnosis or misdiagnosis in IgE-MM.

METHODS

The serum monoclonal protein (M-protein) classification and IgE quantification was performed and sent to several individual institutions. The results were collected and the causes of IgE detection defects were analyzed.

RESULTS

Upon admission to our hospital, the patient's serum free kappa light chain was 1,069.9 mg/L, free lambda light chain was 9.2 mg/L, and free kappa/lambda ratio was 115.9, which met the SLiM criteria, but without CRAB features. Immunofixation electrophoresis (IF) showed "M-like protein aggregation bands" in all lanes. After pretreatment with 1% β-mercaptoethanol to depolymerize the aggregation of monoclonal protein, the "M-like protein aggregation bands disappeared. The other five institutions did not provide the correct typing results. The quantification of serum IgE was as high as 2.06×10⁷ IU/mL, whereas 7 other testing institutions reported IgE levels ranging from 1.0 to 1100 IU/mL.

CONCLUSION

High-risk biomarkers in SLiM criteria can achieve good therapeutic effects in rare IgE-MM patients. Serum immunofixation performed without antisera against IgE, insufficient identification of the lytic bands produced by high macromolecule aggregation in IF, and the absence of a prozone effect avoidance procedure during IgE quantitative detection are the primary causes of missed diagnosis or misdiagnosis in patients with IgE-MM.

Putrescence to Quintessence: An Atypical Presentation of Multiple Osteoporotic Spinal Fractures Masquerading as Multiple Myeloma

A 64-year-old male patient presented with multiple osteoporotic spinal fractures of unknown origin. He was provisionally diagnosed with multiple myeloma based on biochemical and radiological findings. The patient presented in a very frail condition with a questionable outcome but showed a remarkable recovery from being frail to relatively fit. His baseline characteristics including magnetic resonance imaging of the dorsolumbar spine, beta 2 microglobulins, and C-reactive protein improved. The diagnosis was later changed to multiple spinal osteoporotic fractures. In this case report, we highlight that, although it is a good practice to have a single working diagnosis, when the diagnosis is challenging, a holistic approach should be followed to prevent medical and diagnostic miscalculations.