No Evidence of Attentional Modulation of the Neural Response to the Temporal Fine Structure of Continuous Musical Pieces

Cortical linear encoding and decoding of sounds: Similarities and differences between naturalistic speech and music listening

Linear models are becoming increasingly popular to investigate brain activity in response to continuous and naturalistic stimuli. In the context of auditory perception, these predictive models can be 'encoding', when stimulus features are used to reconstruct brain activity, or 'decoding' when neural features are used to reconstruct the audio stimuli. These linear models are a central component of some brain-computer interfaces that can be integrated into hearing assistive devices (e.g., hearing aids). Such advanced neurotechnologies have been widely investigated when listening to speech stimuli but rarely when listening to music. Recent attempts at neural tracking of music show that the reconstruction performances are reduced compared with speech decoding. The present study investigates the performance of stimuli reconstruction and electroencephalogram prediction (decoding and encoding models) based on the cortical entrainment of temporal variations of the audio stimuli for both music and speech listening. Three hypotheses that may explain differences between speech and music stimuli reconstruction were tested to assess the importance of the speech-specific acoustic and linguistic factors. While the results obtained with encoding models suggest different underlying cortical processing between speech and music listening, no differences were found in terms of reconstruction of the stimuli or the cortical data. The results suggest that envelope-based linear modelling can be used to study both speech and music listening, despite the differences in the underlying cortical mechanisms.

Subcortical responses to music and speech are alike while cortical responses diverge

Music and speech are encountered daily and are unique to human beings. Both are transformed by the auditory pathway from an initial acoustical encoding to higher level cognition. Studies of cortex have revealed distinct brain responses to music and speech, but differences may emerge in the cortex or may be inherited from different subcortical encoding. In the first part of this study, we derived the human auditory brainstem response (ABR), a measure of subcortical encoding, to recorded music and speech using two analysis methods. The first method, described previously and acoustically based, yielded very different ABRs between the two sound classes. The second method, however, developed here and based on a physiological model of the auditory periphery, gave highly correlated responses to music and speech. We determined the superiority of the second method through several metrics, suggesting there is no appreciable impact of stimulus class (i.e., music vs speech) on the way stimulus acoustics are encoded subcortically. In this study's second part, we considered the cortex. Our new analysis method resulted in cortical music and speech responses becoming more similar but with remaining differences. The subcortical and cortical results taken together suggest that there is evidence for stimulus-class dependent processing of music and speech at the cortical but not subcortical level.