Treatment of severe, disabling spasticity with continuous intrathecal baclofen therapy following acquired brain injury: the experience of a tertiary institution in Singapore

Real-world impact of intrathecal baclofen therapy: the benefits of neteka on patient outcomes, caregiver burden, and cost efficiency

BACKGROUND

Intrathecal baclofen therapy (ITB) is a well-established treatment modality for severe spasticity, but it is burdened by the need for periodic pump refills. The introduction of a new formulation of baclofen with an extended stability of 180 days (Neteka, Nordic Group BV) could decrease the frequency of refills. We aimed at analyzing the clinical and economic impact of Neteka introduction in our outpatient facility.

METHODS

Forty-eight patients with an implanted device for intrathecal baclofen infusion, who shifted from standard baclofen to Neteka, were included in the present study. We collected clinical and refilling data both from pre-Neteka and Neteka timeframes.

RESULTS

In patients treated with baclofen 2 mg/ml (45/48, 93.8%), the introduction of Neteka led to a significant decrease of median number of refills per year (2.7 vs. 4 in pre-Neteka timeframe, p < 0.0001). This resulted in an improved quality of life, as shown by the reduction of Oberst Caregiving Burden Scale score both for time and difficulty of caregiving (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0003, respectively). Furthermore, a median saving of 302.40 euro per year per patient, as compared to pre-Neteka timeframe, was registered. Similar results were obtained in the smaller cohort treated with baclofen 0.5 mg/ml (3/48, 6.3%). Neteka appreciation rate was high. As expected, no changes in clinical effectiveness of ITB therapy were observed by comparing pre-Neteka and Neteka timeframes.

CONCLUSIONS

The extended half-life provided by Neteka, by reducing the number of refills, could improve patient quality of life, enhance caregiver satisfaction, and decrease the financial burden on healthcare system.

Intrathecal Baclofen Therapy for Refractory Spasticity: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Management of refractory spasticity symptoms remains a challenging task for clinicians. Intrathecal baclofen (ITB) therapy has emerged as a promising option for treating this condition. This study evaluates the effectiveness of ITB therapy in managing refractory spasticity symptoms.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted on 34 patients with refractory spasticity symptoms who underwent ITB therapy at a single institution. The patients' demographics, clinical characteristics, and dosages were recorded. The primary outcome measures were the reduction in pain, improvement in mobility, decrease in spasm frequency, and alleviation of spasticity.

RESULTS

ITB therapy successfully reduced pain, improved mobility, decreased spasm frequency, and alleviated spasticity. The mean daily administered dose was 245 μg (range: 88-510 μg, standard deviation:104). However, it was observed that the appropriate dosage of ITB therapy was patient-specific and time-sensitive. Moreover, side effects were observed when an incorrect dose was administered.

CONCLUSIONS

ITB therapy is an effective and safe option for managing refractory spasticity symptoms. However, the appropriate dosage should be individualized and monitored closely to avoid side effects. This study highlights the importance of carefully considering the potential risks and benefits of ITB therapy for each patient.

Safety and efficiency of Wharton's Jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cell administration in patients with traumatic brain injury: First results of a phase I study

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is characterized by a disruption in the normal function of the brain due to an injury following a trauma, which can potentially cause severe physical, cognitive, and emotional impairment. Stem cell transplantation has evolved as a novel treatment modality in the management of TBI, as it has the potential to arrest the degeneration and promote regeneration of new cells in the brain. Wharton's Jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells (WJ-MSCs) have recently shown beneficial effects in the functional recovery of neurological deficits.

AIM

To evaluate the safety and efficiency of MSC therapy in TBI.

METHODS

We present 6 patients, 4 male and 2 female aged between 21 and 27 years who suffered a TBI. These 6 patients underwent 6 doses of intrathecal, intramuscular (i.m.) and intravenous transplantation of WJ-MSCs at a target dose of 1 × 106/kg for each application route. Spasticity was assessed using the Modified Ashworth scale (MAS), motor function according to the Medical Research Council Muscle Strength Scale, quality of life was assessed by the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scale and Karnofsky Performance Status scale.

RESULTS

Our patients showed only early, transient complications, such as subfebrile fever, mild headache, and muscle pain due to i.m. injection, which resolved within 24 h. During the one year follow-up, no other safety issues or adverse events were reported. These 6 patients showed improvements in their cognitive abilities, muscle spasticity, muscle strength, performance scores and fine motor skills when compared before and after the intervention. MAS values, which we used to assess spasticity, were observed to statistically significantly decrease for both left and right sides (P < 0.001). The FIM scale includes both motor scores (P < 0.05) and cognitive scores (P < 0.001) and showed a significant increase in pretest posttest analyses. The difference observed in the participants' Karnofsky Performance Scale values pre and post the intervention was statistically significant (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that cell transplantation has a safe, effective and promising future in the management of TBI.

Safety and efficiency of Wharton’s Jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cell administration in patients with traumatic brain injury: First results of a phase I study

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is characterized by a disruption in the normal function of the brain due to an injury following a trauma, which can potentially cause severe physical, cognitive, and emotional impairment. Stem cell transplantation has evolved as a novel treatment modality in the management of TBI, as it has the potential to arrest the degeneration and promote regeneration of new cells in the brain. Wharton’s Jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells (WJ-MSCs) have recently shown beneficial effects in the functional recovery of neurological deficits.

AIM

To evaluate the safety and efficiency of MSC therapy in TBI.

METHODS

We present 6 patients, 4 male and 2 female aged between 21 and 27 years who suffered a TBI. These 6 patients underwent 6 doses of intrathecal, intramuscular (i.m.) and intravenous transplantation of WJ-MSCs at a target dose of 1 × 10⁶/kg for each application route. Spasticity was assessed using the Modified Ashworth scale (MAS), motor function according to the Medical Research Council Muscle Strength Scale, quality of life was assessed by the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scale and Karnofsky Performance Status scale.

RESULTS

Our patients showed only early, transient complications, such as subfebrile fever, mild headache, and muscle pain due to i.m. injection, which resolved within 24 h. During the one year follow-up, no other safety issues or adverse events were reported. These 6 patients showed improvements in their cognitive abilities, muscle spasticity, muscle strength, performance scores and fine motor skills when compared before and after the intervention. MAS values, which we used to assess spasticity, were observed to statistically significantly decrease for both left and right sides (P < 0.001). The FIM scale includes both motor scores (P < 0.05) and cognitive scores (P < 0.001) and showed a significant increase in pretest posttest analyses. The difference observed in the participants’ Karnofsky Performance Scale values pre and post the intervention was statistically significant (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that cell transplantation has a safe, effective and promising future in the management of TBI.

Evaluation of the Effect of Intranasal Lidocaine in the Treatment of Spasticity in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury

Background

Spasticity following traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the most significant barriers of returning patients to their normal life. Spasticity caused by TBI does not have a specific or definitive treatment, and the clinical effect of pharmacologic treatments has not been significant.

Methods

In this single-arm study, we evaluated 15 patients. For each patient with spasticity, treatment with oral baclofen 25 mg was started three times a day as a part of standard therapy. After 48 hours, if the spasticity did not decrease by at least one score in the Modified Tardieu or Ashworth scales, lidocaine 0.5% was administered as a continuous intranasal infusion. The initial dose of lidocaine was 1 mg/min, which was gradually increased to 2 mg/min. Spasticity and the frequency of spasms were assessed by Ashworth and modified tardieu scales (MTS) and Spasm Frequency Score (SFS), respectively. Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and arterial oxygen saturation (SP_o2) of patients were recorded during nine days of treatment. All data were analyzed by SPSS version 21. P-value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

Out of 15 participants in this study, 13 (86.7%) were male, and 2 (13.3%) were female (mean age: 29.26 ± 12.5 years). There were no significant differences in Ashworth Scale, Modified Tradieu Scale, RASS Score, GCS Score, MAP, SP_o2 percentage, HR, RR, and the number of spasms per day between the time of initiation of treatment and the second day of baclofen treatment (P > 0.05). Evaluation of spasticity using Ashworth scale on the first and last days of lidocaine treatment showed a significant decrease in the mean spasticity (3.46 ± 0.51 and 1.46 ± 0.91, respectively; P < 0.001). Spasticity assessment using the MTS showed a significant reduction in the mean of the last day of treatment compared to the mean of the first day of treatment (3.6 ± 0.5 and 1.26 ± 0.51, respectively; P < 0.001). This decrease was also seen in the mean of the last day of treatment compared to the first day in SFS (13.3 ± 3.88 and 3.8 ± 0.51, respectively; P < 0.001). Comparison of HR, RR, MAP, RASS, GCS, and SP_o2 on the first and last days of treatment did not show any statistical differences.

Conclusions

Although continuous intranasal treatment with lidocaine can be effective in spasm reduction of patients with TBI, further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are required.