Short-term outcomes of patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with canagliflozin compared with sitagliptin in a real-world setting

Real-world evaluation of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors for managing type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective multi-ethnic cohort study

Abstract

Purpose

Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors are increasingly used as second-line therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes. The aim of this study was to assess the real-world effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in a multi-ethnic population in Singapore.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study examined patients diagnosed with and treated for diabetes from the Ministry of Health’s administrative database. Differences in outcomes between treatment groups were assessed using Poisson regression. Demographics, clinical characteristics, previous diagnoses and hospitalisations, and diabetes medication history were used for propensity score matching. Subgroup analyses by ethnicity were performed. Effect size was estimated using risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Patients initiating SGLT2 inhibitors were more likely to achieve glycaemic control target than DPP4 inhibitor-treated patients (RR 1.09; 95% CI 1.04, 1.14). This was observed only in patients of Chinese ethnicity. A higher risk of diabetic ketoacidosis in SGLT2 inhibitor initiators was not observed. SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with reduced risk of hypoglycaemia (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.59, 0.82) and urinary tract infection (RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.43, 0.63) but was not statistically significant for hypoglycaemia in Malay patients. Compared to DPP4 inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with 12% and 34% reduction in any-cause hospitalisation and all-cause mortality, respectively, potentially resulting in more than $50 million savings over 10 years.

Conclusion

SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with improvements in glycaemic control, reduced risk of complications, and was well tolerated. Ethnicity also plays a role and should be considered in future studies.

Comparison of cardiovascular outcomes and cardiometabolic risk factors between patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors: a meta-analysis

AIMS 

Prevention of cardiovascular outcomes is a goal of the management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus patients as important as lowering blood glucose levels. Among the various glucose-lowering agents, the effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2Is) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4Is) on cardiovascular outcomes have become the focus of recent researches.

METHODS AND RESULTS 

A systematic search was performed through several online database. All studies that compared the effects of SGLT-2Is and DPP-4Is on cardiovascular outcomes and cardiometabolic risk factors were reviewed. A total of 30 studies were included. Compared with DPP-4Is, SGLT-2Is treatment reduced the risk of stroke [risk ratio (RR) = 0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.76-0.84], myocardial infarction (RR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.81-0.89), heart failure (RR = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.54-0.62), cardiovascular mortality (RR = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.51-0.60), and all-cause mortality (RR = 0.60; 95% CI, 0.57-0.63). In addition, SGLT-2Is presented favourable effects on hemoglobinA1c, fasting plasma glucose, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure. The differences in blood lipids were also compared.

CONCLUSION

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors are superior to DPP-4Is in terms of cardiovascular outcomes. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors bring more benefits with respect to the cardiometabolic risk factors.

Adverse Drug Events Associated with sitagliptin Versus canagliflozin for the Treatment of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Comparison Through a Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

In this meta-analysis, we aimed to systematically compare the adverse drug events associated with sitagliptin (100 mg) versus canagliflozin 100 or 300 mg in patients who were treated for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

Online databases were searched for relevant studies comparing sitagliptin (100 mg) versus canagliflozin. Adverse drug events were considered as the clinical endpoints. The analysis was carried out by RevMan software whereby risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were generated.

RESULTS

Five studies with a total number of 2322 patients were included. When sitagliptin (100 mg) was compared with canagliflozin (100 mg), the endpoints of any adverse events, adverse events leading to drug discontinuation, serious adverse events, urinary tract infections, hypoglycemia, and adverse events related to hypovolemia were not significantly different: (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.00-1.21; P = 0.05), (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.67-2.16; P = 0.54), (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.49-1.66; P = 0.73), (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.77-2.08; P = 0.36), (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.30-3.43; P = 0.99), and (RR 1.76, 95% CI 0.52-5.94; P = 0.36), respectively. However, canagliflozin was associated with increased genital mycotic infection (RR 4.32, 95% CI 2.11-8.83; P = 0.0001). When genital mycotic infections associated with sitagliptin versus canagliflozin were compared in male and female patients separately, the risk was still significantly higher with canagliflozin: (RR 7.00, 95% CI 2.44-20.06; P = 0.003) and (RR 4.02, 95% CI 2.22-7.27; P = 0.00001), respectively. The same results were obtained when sitagliptin (100 mg) was compared to canagliflozin 300 mg.

CONCLUSIONS

Canagliflozin was associated with a significantly higher risk of genital mycotic infections when compared to sitagliptin. However, the other adverse drug events were similarly manifested when sitagliptin 100 mg was compared to either canagliflozin 100 or 300 mg.