1
|
Han Y, Qi W, Wang S, Cao W, Chen J, Cai G. Identification of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer eligible for neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone: Results of a retrospective study. Cancer Med 2023; 12:13309-13318. [PMID: 37148548 PMCID: PMC10315751 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) appears in a few clinical studies as an alternative to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) in selected patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of nCT with or without nCRT in patients with LARC and to identify patients who may be suitable for nCT alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 155 patients with LARC who received neoadjuvant treatment (NT) were retrospectively analysed from January 2016 to June 2021. The patients were divided into two groups: nCRT (n = 101) and nCT (n = 54). More patients with locally advanced disease (cT4, cN+ and magnetic resonance imaging-detected mesorectal fascia [mrMRF] positive [+]) were found in the nCRT group. Patients in the nCRT group received a dose of 50 Gy/25 Fx irradiation with concurrent capecitabine, and the median number of nCT cycles was two. In the nCT group, the median number of cycles was four. RESULTS The median follow-up duration was 30 months. The pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in the nCRT group was significantly higher than that in the nCT group (17.5% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.047). A significant difference was observed in the locoregional recurrence rate (LRR); 6.9% in the nCRT group and 16.7% in the nCT group (p = 0.011). Among patients with initial mrMRF (+) status, the LRR in the nCRT group was significantly lower than that in the nCT group (6.1% vs. 20%, p = 0.007), but not in patients with initial mrMRF negative (-) (10.5% in each group, p = 0.647). Compared with the nCT group, a lower LRR was observed in patients in the nCRT group with initial mrMRF (+) converted to mrMRF (-) after NT (5.3% vs. 23%, p = 0.009). No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding acute toxicity and overall and progression-free survivals. Multivariate analysis showed that nCRT and ypN stage were independent prognostic factors for the development of LRR. CONCLUSION Patients with initial mrMRF (-) may be suitable for nCT alone. However, patients with initial mrMRF (+) converted to mrMRF (-) after nCT are still at high risk of LRR, and radiotherapy is recommended. Prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi‐min Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin HospitalShanghai Jiaotong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Wei‐xiang Qi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin HospitalShanghai Jiaotong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Shu‐bei Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin HospitalShanghai Jiaotong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Wei‐guo Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin HospitalShanghai Jiaotong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Jia‐yi Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin HospitalShanghai Jiaotong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Gang Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin HospitalShanghai Jiaotong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ulusoy C, Kamalı GH, Nikolovski A. Analysis of Survival in Complete Pathological Response after Long-Course Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Advanced Rectal Cancer. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:1054-1064. [PMID: 36661730 PMCID: PMC9857960 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30010081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy prior to surgery is the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. This consists in the patient's complete pathological response being achieved with no residual tumor presence in the resected specimen, which results in survival improvement. METHODS This retrospective study aimed to examine the rate of complete pathological response in patients with advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiotherapy and to examine the survival differences between the different tumor regression grade (TRG) scores. RESULTS A total of 154 patients were operated prior to long-course chemoradiotherapy with a total of 50 Gy plus FOLFOX protocol. Complete pathologic response was achieved in 29 (18.8%) patients. There was no statistical difference for the different pathologic responses according to gender, type of surgery, and number of harvested lymph nodes. Mean survival for all the groups was 37.2 months. Survival within a different TRG score exhibited statistical significance (p = 0.006). Overall, the survival rate during the follow-up period was of 81.8%. CONCLUSIONS The complete pathological response rate in this study was of 18.8%. High tumor regression grade scores (TRG0 and TRG1) had a survival rate of over 90% during follow-up. Multivariate analysis identified perineural invasion and tumor regression grade as independent factors that affect survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cemal Ulusoy
- Department of General Surgery, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşçıoğlu Şehir Hastanesi, Istanbul 34384, Turkey
| | - Gülçin Harman Kamalı
- Department of Pathology, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşçıoğlu Şehir Hastanesi, Istanbul 34384, Turkey
| | - Andrej Nikolovski
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Surgical Clinic “Sv. Naum Ohridski”, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, 1000 Skopje, North Macedonia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li JY, Huang XZ, Gao P, Song YX, Chen XW, Lv XE, Fu Y, Xiao Q, Ye SY, Wang ZN. Survival landscape of different tumor regression grades and pathologic complete response in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy based on reconstructed individual patient data. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:1214. [PMID: 34773999 PMCID: PMC8590217 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08922-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant therapy can lead to different tumor regression grades (TRG) in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. The purposes of this study are to investigate the relationships among TRG, pathologic complete response (pCR) and long-term survival, on the basis of reconstructed individual patient data (IPD). METHODS The PubMed, Embase, Ovid and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the survival landscape of different TRGs after neoadjuvant therapy and the secondary endpoint was to evaluate the associations between pCR and survival. IPD were reconstructed with Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS The 10-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) were clearly higher in the pCR group than in the non-pCR (npCR) group (80.5% vs. 48.3, 90.1% vs. 69.8%). Furthermore, the OS and DFS increased with improvement in tumor regression after neoadjuvant therapy. According to the IPD, the pCR group had longer OS (HR = 0.240, 95% CI = 0.177-0.325, p < 0.001) and DFS (HR = 0.274, 95% CI = 0.205-0.367, p < 0.001) than the npCR group. Better tumor regression was associated with better survival outcomes (p < 0.005). Direct calculation of published HR values yielded similar results. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate a positive relationship between better tumor regressions and improved survival benefits among the npCR group and patients with rectal cancer achieving pCR had much longer OS and DFS than patients achieving npCR, presenting a survival landscape of different TRGs and pCR in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia-Yi Li
- Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Heping District, Shenyang City, 110001, China
| | - Xuan-Zhang Huang
- Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Heping District, Shenyang City, 110001, China
| | - Peng Gao
- Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Heping District, Shenyang City, 110001, China
| | - Yong-Xi Song
- Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Heping District, Shenyang City, 110001, China
| | - Xiao-Wan Chen
- Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Heping District, Shenyang City, 110001, China
| | - Xing-Er Lv
- Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Heping District, Shenyang City, 110001, China
| | - Yv Fu
- Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Heping District, Shenyang City, 110001, China
| | - Qiong Xiao
- Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Heping District, Shenyang City, 110001, China
| | - Shi-Yv Ye
- Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Heping District, Shenyang City, 110001, China
| | - Zhen-Ning Wang
- Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Heping District, Shenyang City, 110001, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lancellotti F, Solinas L, Sagnotta A, Mancini S, Cosentino LPM, Belardi A, Battaglia B, Mirri MA, Ciabattoni A, Salerno F, Loponte M. Short course radiotherapy and delayed surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer in frail patients: is it a valid option? Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:2046-2052. [PMID: 33757649 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.03.230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Revised: 11/28/2020] [Accepted: 03/06/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The endpoint of the present study was to evaluate the outcomes of short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) and SCRT with delayed surgery (SCRT-DS) on a selected subgroup of frail patients with locally advanced middle/low rectal adenocarcinoma. METHODS From January 2008 to December 2018, a total of 128 frail patients with locally advanced middle-low rectal adenocarcinoma underwent SCRT and subsequent restaging for eventual delayed surgery. Rates of complete pathological response, down-staging, disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. RESULTS 128 patients completed 5 × 5 Gy pelvic radiotherapy. 69 of these were unfit for surgery; 59 underwent surgery 8 weeks (average time: 61 days) after radiotherapy. Downstaging of T occurred in 64% and down-staging of N in 50%. The median overall survival (OS) of SCRT alone was 19.5 months. The 1-year, 2-year, 3-year and 5-year OS was 48%, 22%, 14% and 0% respectively. In the surgical group, the median disease-free survival (DFS) and median OS were, respectively, 67 months (95% CI 49.8-83.1 months) and 72.1 months (95% CI 57.5-86.7 months). The 1, 2, 3, 5-year OS was 88%, 75%, 51%, 46%, respectively. Post-operative morbidity was 22%, mortality was 3.4%. CONCLUSIONS Frail patients with advanced rectal cancer are often "unfit" for long-term neoadjuvant chemoradiation. A SCRT may be considered a valid option for this group of patients. Once radiotherapy is completed, patients can be re-evaluated for surgery. If feasible, SCRT and delayed surgery is the best option for frail patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Luigi Solinas
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy.
| | - Andrea Sagnotta
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy.
| | - Stefano Mancini
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy.
| | | | - Augusto Belardi
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy.
| | - Benedetto Battaglia
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy.
| | | | | | | | - Margherita Loponte
- Department of Emergency Surgery, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Late gastrointestinal toxicity after radiotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic review. Int J Colorectal Dis 2020; 35:977-983. [PMID: 32296933 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03595-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although the multimodal cancer treatment techniques have greatly improved over the years, irradiation-induced late gastrointestinal toxicity remains a great concern as it may highly affect the quality of life of a patient. The aim of this study was to define the prevalence of late gastrointestinal toxicities. METHODS Electronic databases of Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL and PubMed were searched until September 2019. We used the following keywords: radiotherapy, radiation therapy, irradiation, rectal cancer, gastrointestinal toxicity, adverse effects, late effects, pelvic radiation and pelvic radiation disease. RESULTS Nine studies were included into this review out of 4785 that were preidentified as potentially relevant. Overall prevalence of severe (Grade 3 or higher) late irradiation-induced gastrointestinal toxicities was up to 19%. Most frequent toxicities of any grade were reported to be diarrhoea (up to 35%), faecal incontinence (22%), incontinence to gas (71%), rectal bleeding (9%), rectal pain (13%) and obstruction (7.4%). Preoperative treatment approaches and more advance radiotherapy techniques such as intensity-modulated and image-guided radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) turn out to result in lower late gastrointestinal toxicity rates. CONCLUSION After great improvements in rectal cancer treatment, late gastrointestinal toxicity after radiotherapy is experienced less frequent and less severe; however, it remains a great concern associated with worse quality of life.
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) has remained an important pillar in the multi-modality management of rectal cancer. Adjuvant RT with concurrent chemotherapy (chemo-RT) was once the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer, but with time, that has now changed and neoadjuvant chemo-RT followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery is the new standard. Alternatively, neoadjuvant RT alone remains an option and clinicians are tasked to choose between the two. In an era of personalised oncological management, it is unsurprising that the treatment for rectal cancer is following suit and upcoming trials are studying ways to improve outcomes and minimise toxicity for patients while tailoring treatments specific to each patient's tumour. We review the evolution of the role of RT in rectal cancer and look forward to what the future holds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore (NCIS), National University Health Systems (NUHS), Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yu Yang Soon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore (NCIS), National University Health Systems (NUHS), Singapore, Singapore
| | - Balamurugan Vellayappan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore (NCIS), National University Health Systems (NUHS), Singapore, Singapore
| | - Francis Ho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore (NCIS), National University Health Systems (NUHS), Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jeremy Tey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore (NCIS), National University Health Systems (NUHS), Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rivero M, Peinado-Serrano J, Muñoz-Galvan S, Espinosa-Sánchez A, Suarez-Martinez E, Felipe-Abrio B, Fernández-Fernández MC, Ortiz MJ, Carnero A. MAP17 (PDZK1IP1) and pH2AX are potential predictive biomarkers for rectal cancer treatment efficacy. Oncotarget 2018; 9:32958-32971. [PMID: 30250642 PMCID: PMC6152481 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.26010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2018] [Accepted: 07/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Rectal cancer represents approximately 10% of cancers worldwide. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy increases complete pathologic response and local control, although it offers a poor advantage in survivorship and sphincter saving compared with that of radiotherapy alone. After preoperative chemoradiotherapy, approximately 20% of patients with rectal cancer achieve a pathologic complete response to the removed surgical specimen; this response may be related to a better prognosis and an improvement in disease-free survival. However, better biomarkers to predict response and new targets are needed to stratify patients and obtain better response rates. MAP17 (PDZK1IP1) is a small, 17 kDa non-glycosylated membrane protein located in the plasma membrane and Golgi apparatus and is overexpressed in a wide variety of human carcinomas. MAP17 has been proposed as a predictive biomarker for reactive oxygen species, ROS, inducing treatments in cervical tumors or laryngeal carcinoma. Due to the increase in ROS, MAP17 is also associated with the marker of DNA damage, phosphoH2AX (pH2AX). In the present manuscript, we examined the values of MAP17 and pH2AX as surrogate biomarkers of the response in rectal tumors. MAP17 expression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy is able to predict the response to chemoradiotherapy, similar to the increase in pH2AX. Furthermore, we explored whether we can identify molecular targeted therapies that could help improve the response of these tumors to radiotherapy. In this sense, we found that the inhibition of DNA damage with olaparib increased the response to radio- and chemotherapy, specifically in tumors with high levels of pH2AX and MAP17.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Rivero
- Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, HUVR, CSIC, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.,Department of Radiation Oncology, HUVR, Seville, Spain.,Department of Pathology, HUVR, Seville, Spain
| | - Javier Peinado-Serrano
- Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, HUVR, CSIC, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.,Department of Radiation Oncology, HUVR, Seville, Spain.,CIBER de Cáncer, ISCIII, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sandra Muñoz-Galvan
- Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, HUVR, CSIC, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.,CIBER de Cáncer, ISCIII, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Elisa Suarez-Martinez
- Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, HUVR, CSIC, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain
| | - Blanca Felipe-Abrio
- Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, HUVR, CSIC, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.,CIBER de Cáncer, ISCIII, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria Carmen Fernández-Fernández
- Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, HUVR, CSIC, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.,Department of Pathology, HUVR, Seville, Spain
| | - Maria Jose Ortiz
- Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, HUVR, CSIC, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.,Department of Radiation Oncology, HUVR, Seville, Spain
| | - Amancio Carnero
- Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, HUVR, CSIC, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.,CIBER de Cáncer, ISCIII, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|