Knowledge of orthopaedic implant costs and healthcare schemes among orthopaedic residents

No longer a blank cheque: a narrative scoping review of physician awareness of cost

OBJECTIVES

Healthcare costs have been steadily rising, and attention to cost containment in healthcare systems is increasingly important. It has been previously established that physicians lack adequate awareness of cost in health care and that by increasing awareness, costs can be reduced. This scoping review examines cost awareness of medications, investigations and procedures and identifies potential interventions that may serve to improve physician awareness.

STUDY DESIGN

A scoping review was performed to evaluate the literature based on established Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

METHODS

A review of electronic databases was performed for studies regarding physician awareness of cost, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar.

RESULTS

An initial 4350 citations were identified, and 76 articles were included for full text analysis. Combined, these studies assessed 18,901 physicians. The overwhelming majority (91%) found cost awareness in physicians was low and demonstrated significant room for cost reduction. Eighteen of the 76 studies assessed an intervention to improve physician awareness of cost and used either a price list (89%) or a teaching session (11%) as the primary intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Research demonstrates that there is still a lack of awareness among physicians of the costs of medications, investigations and procedures/consumables. Initial approaches using price display and teaching sessions have shown promise. Further research into best practices for education around cost, beginning in medical school and continuing into established medical and surgical practices, may lead to increased cost savings in health care.

Implant wastage in orthopaedic trauma: a UK experience

INTRODUCTION

Implant wastage is an under-reported issue in orthopaedics, yet it has been shown to have a significant cost burden on healthcare budgets. In a background of a perilous financial climate in the UK health service, our aim was to define the frequency and costs of implant wastage in orthopaedic trauma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The trauma theatre's implant logbook was retrospectively analysed between April 2017 and April 2018. Wasted implants were identified by the study authors independently. Patient demographics, implant details and costs were among the data collected. Product codes of wasted implants were used to identify implant costs through the manufacturer.

RESULTS

Implant wastage occurred in 25.1% of trauma procedures during the study period. Most wasted implants (91%) were screws. The total cost of implant wastage was £8,377.25 during the 12-month period, accounting for 2% of the total implant budget. Wasted intramedullary nails accounted for almost 50% of the total cost. More than 51% of affected procedures involved a trainee as the primary operator.

DISCUSSION

We report the first study of implant wastage in orthopaedics from the UK. Total implant wastage was higher than reported in most of the published literature, although it represented a small portion of the budget. Implant wastage is attributable to surgeons or operating theatre staff in most cases and is compounded by surgeons' limited understanding of implant costs. Initiatives to reduce implant wastage should include raising awareness of costs and departmental wastage to surgeons and operating theatre staff as well as employing preoperative planning techniques.