Size dependent antipredator responses in a fish-shrimp mutualism

For prey, taking refuge from predators has obvious fitness benefits but may also be costly by impinging on time and effort available for feeding or attracting mates. The antipredator responses of refuge-seeking animals are therefore predicted to vary strategically depending on how threatening they perceive the risk. To test this, we studied the impacts of a simulated predatory threat on the antipredator responses of wild sandy prawn-gobies (Ctenogobiops feroculus) that co-inhabit burrows with Alpheus shrimp (family Alpheidae) in a mutualistic relationship. We exposed goby-shrimp pairs, repeatedly on three separate occasions, to an approaching threat and measured the antipredator behaviours of both partners. We found that re-emerging from the burrow took longer in large compared to small fish. Moreover, quicker re-emergence by small-but not medium or large-sized gobies-was associated with an earlier flight from the approaching threat (i.e. when the threat was still further away). Finally, the goby and shrimp sharing a burrow were matched in body size and their risk-taking behaviour was highly dependent on one another. The findings contribute to our understanding of how an individual's phenotype and perception of danger relates to its risk-taking strategy, and how mutualistic partners can have similar risk sensitivities.

Directional escape strategy by the striped plateau lizard (Sceloporus virgatus): turning to direct escape away from predators at variable escape angles

A prey’s orientation to a predator’s approach path affects risk of fleeing straight ahead. By turning to flee closer to straight away from the predator before fleeing, prey can reduce risk. Laboratory studies suggest that escape angles should lead away from predators and be unpredictable. I studied orientation, turn, and escape angles and in a study of striped plateau lizards,Sceloporus virgatus. Lizards fled away from a predator, but often not straight away. Escape angles were variable and bimodally distributed: one mode was straight away for distancing prey from predator and one was near 90°, which maintains ability to monitor the predator or requires turning by the predator. Turn angles increased as orientation shifted toward the predator. Escape angle was closer to straight away when turn angle was larger, but turning did not fully compensate for degree of orientation toward the predator. Directional escape strategies of diverse prey are compared.