Effect of leukotriene and thromboxane antagonist on propranolol-induced bronchoconstriction

Airway responsiveness to indirect challenges in COPD

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) demonstrate airway hyperresponsiveness to a number of indirect stimuli. Hyperresponsiveness to cold air hyperventilation, exercise, and drugs like propranalol and methoxamine seem to be able to distinguish patients with COPD from those with asthma, whereas hyperresponsiveness to stimuli like adenosine 5-monophosphate (AMP) and hypertonic saline seem unable to do so. The relationship of airway responsiveness to indirect stimuli and airway inflammation has received little study. The clinical relevance of hyperresponsiveness to an indirect challenge, including the impact on the natural history, relation to types of bronchitis, baseline airway calibre, and response to treatment need to be studied.

Absence of respiratory effects with ivabradine in patients with asthma

AIM

beta-Blockers are commonly prescribed for stable angina and are recommended as initial therapy. However, beta-blockers are contraindicated in patients with obstructive airway disease because of a risk of bronchoconstriction. Ivabradine is a specific heart rate-lowering agent that acts via I(f) pacemaker channels in the sinoatrial node with no beta-adrenoreceptor activity. Ivabradine has been recently approved for the treatment of stable angina. This study assessed the effects of repeated administration of ivabradine on lung function in patients with asthma.

METHODS

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, 20 subjects with asthma received either oral ivabradine 10 mg b.i.d. or placebo for 4.5 days. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) were designated as the main outcome variable. Diary cards were used to monitor asthma symptoms on a five-point scale, rescue medication usage, and adverse events.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in mean variation of FEV(1) (ivabradine P = 0.664; placebo P = 0.652) or PEFR (ivabradine P = 0.153; placebo P = 0.356) from baseline following administration of ivabradine. There was also no significant difference in maximum percent variation in FEV(1) or PEF between treatment groups (P = 0.994; FEV(1) and P = 0.704; PEF). On a similar note, there was no significant difference in asthma symptoms or rescue medication usage reported between the two groups. Adverse events were generally mild-to-moderate in intensity and no cardiovascular or serious adverse events were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that ivabradine does not affect respiratory function or symptoms in patients with asthma and therefore represents a valuable therapeutic alternative to beta-blockers for treating patients with stable angina and asthma.

Getting to the heart of asthma: can "beta blockers" be useful to treat asthma?

beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists are the mainstay for the acute symptomatic treatment of asthma and provide effective bronchoprotection to a wide range of bronchoconstrictor agents. However, over the past 4 decades there has been a continuing debate concerning whether regular chronic treatment with these drugs may be doing more harm than good. The FDA's recent decision to add black box warnings concerning the regular use of salmeterol- and formoterol-containing compounds, as well as their decision not to recommend agents containing long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists as first-line therapy, seems to confirm the concerns regarding the regular use of the long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists. A similar debate arose in the late 1980s concerning the use of beta-adrenoceptor agonists in the treatment of heart failure. In this disease, short-term use of beta agonists is associated with increased cardiac index and stroke volume, yet their long-term use is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Moreover, certain beta blockers that are initially detrimental when used short term are now considered beneficial in the treatment of this disease when used chronically. Here, there is a parallel, as beta blockers are contraindicated in patients with asthma but the use of beta blockers chronically has never been evaluated. This begs the question of whether a similar paradigm shift is applicable in the treatment of asthma and whether under certain circumstances the long-term use of certain beta blockers may be useful in the treatment of this disease.

Medications as asthma triggers

Certain medications can generate asthma symptoms, with the potential to cause considerable morbidity. This article focuses on the common drugs that have the potential to cause distinct respiratory reactions in asthmatics: aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, beta-blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. The means by which these medications can trigger asthma vary in terms of acuity of onset, severity, and the mechanisms involved. The general and most practical approach is avoidance and cautious use of these drugs in asthmatics. However, these classes of medications can exert a major role in the management of common and serious diseases. Fortunately, controller therapy for asthma and alternative or more selective medications for the treatment of these conditions are now available.

Pranlukast: a review of its use in the management of asthma

Pranlukast (Onon, Azlaire), is an orally administered, selective, competitive antagonist of the cysteinyl leukotrienes (LT) C(4), LTD(4) and LTE(4). It is indicated for the prophylactic treatment of chronic bronchial asthma in paediatric and adult patients. The efficacy of pranlukast 225mg twice daily in adults with mild to moderate asthma was demonstrated in double-blind, placebo- or azelastine-controlled studies of 4 or 8 weeks' duration. The drug at this dosage was superior to both comparators in improving mean attack scores and morning and/or evening peak expiratory flow rates, and decreasing the use of rescue bronchodilators (p < 0.05). In limited clinical studies, pranlukast 225mg twice daily appeared to be as effective as montelukast 10mg once daily and zafirlukast 40mg twice daily in adults with mild to moderate asthma. Tachyphylaxis was absent when the drug was administered for up to 4 years. In patients requiring high-dose inhaled corticosteroid therapy, pranlukast 225 mg twice daily plus a halved dosage of inhaled corticosteroid was as effective as the original dosage of inhaled corticosteroid. Pranlukast was also effective in patients with mild to severe asthma in a clinical practice setting. In a double-blind trial, greater improvements in most outcome measures were observed with pranlukast than with oxatomide in children and adolescents with asthma. In clinical trials, pranlukast was well tolerated in adult and paediatric patients with asthma, with an adverse event profile similar to that of placebo. Gastrointestinal events and hepatic function abnormalities were the most commonly reported adverse events. No clinically significant differences in adverse event profiles between pranlukast, zafirlukast or montelukast were shown in limited comparisons. Although Churg-Strauss syndrome has been noted in pranlukast recipients, a direct causal relationship is unlikely.

CONCLUSIONS

Pranlukast is a well tolerated and effective preventative treatment in adult and paediatric patients with persistent asthma of all severities. In some patients, pranlukast may be beneficial when added to low-dose inhaled corticosteroids; it may also be a viable alternative to increasing inhaled corticosteroid dosages. The efficacy of pranlukast relative to placebo has been confirmed; its efficacy relative to other therapy awaits further investigation. Nonetheless, pranlukast is a useful therapeutic option (with as-required short-acting beta(2)-agonists), either as preventative monotherapy for the treatment of mild persistent asthma or in conjunction with inhaled corticosteroids in the management of moderate or severe persistent asthma.

An unusual death in an asthmatic patient

A 35-year-old black woman with a history of bronchial asthma collapsed and died after ingestion of three 20-mg tablets of propranolol. She was recently treated in the emergency department at a local hospital for an acute asthma exacerbation and was given a written prescription for prednisone. The prescription was filled and the medication was taken as prescribed. Within minutes after ingestion of the medication, she became acutely short of breath and was witnessed to collapse. Paramedics responded to the scene and initiated resuscitative efforts while en route to the local emergency department. The decedent was unable to be resuscitated and was pronounced dead shortly after reaching the hospital. It was later discovered that the medication she was given by the pharmacy was 20-mg propranolol tablets instead of 20-mg prednisone tablets.

The effect of seratrodast on eosinophil cationic protein and symptoms in asthmatics

Thromboxane A2 (TXA2), an arachidonate derivative, is a potent bronchoconstrictor; therefore, blocking TXA2 should attenuate airway narrowing. Seratrodast, a TXA2 receptor antagonist, is expected to be a potent antiasthmatic. It was reported that seratrodast reduced bronchial hyperresponsiveness. However, it is controversial whether it reduces airway inflammation. We studied some additional effects of oral seratrodast to inhaled corticosteroids on 10 adult asthmatics in an open-label, crossover design study. Eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels in serum and sputum, peak expiratory flow rate (PEF), clinical symptoms, and airway responsiveness were evaluated. Clinical symptom scores were improved by administration of seratrodast (p < 0.05). The addition of seratrodast to asthmatic patients significantly improved mean PEF (p < 0.05). In addition, withdrawal of seratrodast resulted in deterioration of PEF. Airway hyperresponsiveness to acetylcholine measured by Astograph was improved by administration of seratrodast (p < 0.01), and returned to the level of "run-in period" after withdrawal. Administration of seratrodast decreased the concentration of ECP in sputum significantly (p < 0.05), and sputum ECP significantly increased again after withdrawal of (p < 0.05). These results suggest that seratrodast improves clinical symptoms andairway hyperresponsiveness by reducing airway inflammation. Seratrodast may be useful as an anti-inflammatory agent and beneficial when added to inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of bronchial asthma.