Effect of inspiratory flow pattern and inspiratory to expiratory ratio on nonlinear elastic behavior in patients with acute lung injury

Laparoscopic surgery: It is no necessary to change ventilator mode to improve ventilation conditions; a controlled trial

Backgrounds/Aims

The main objective of this study is to compare the ventilatory effects of AFVC and PC modes with the VC mode in laparoscopic surgery of the gall bladder.

Methods

Thirty-five patients programmed for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included. Four times were defined for all patients. The parameters studied were recorded ten minutes after anesthetic induction; and this is the time T1. The time T2 fits to 10 min after induction of pneumoperitoneum. Then, the ventilator mode was changed from VC mode to AFVC mode. Ten minutes later, the variables were scored; it was the time T3. The ventilator mode was then changed to a PC mode. The set pressure was adjusted in order to obtain the same Vt as at the time T2. The time T4 was 10 minutes after switching to PC mode.

Results

The Vte were increased, compared to time T2, during the AFVC and PC modes. The induction of pneumoperitoneum with CO₂ induced a rise of P_ETCO₂ between T1 and T2. These had been accompanied by a significant rise in airway pressures. The change from VC mode to AFVC mode resulted in lower Prpeak and Prtray elevation without impacting dynamic compliance.

Conclusions

AFVC mode appears safe for patients in laparoscopic surgery. Its use, compared with VC, is associated with a decrease in Prpeak without effects on the Cdyn, oxygenation, capnia and hemodynamic parameters. We conclude that is no necessary to change ventlatory modes to improve ventilation conditions in non-obese patients.

The Effects of Volume-Controlled and Pressure-Controlled Ventilation on Lung Mechanics, Oxidative Stress, and Recovery in Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare ventilation variables, changes in oxidative stress, and the quality of recovery in 2 different ventilation strategies (volume-controlled ventilation [VCV] and pressure-controlled ventilation [PCV]) during gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.

DESIGN

A prospective randomized controlled trial (Canadian Task Force classification I).

SETTING

One university teaching hospital in Taiwan.

PATIENTS

Women scheduled for laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Women were randomly assigned to receive either VCV or PCV during surgery.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Ventilation variables were recorded 1 minute before and 1 hour after pneumoperitoneum. Blood samples were collected for malondialdehyde measurement at 7 points: 1 minute before and 1 hour after pneumoperitoneum; 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after deflation; and 24 hours after surgery. Postoperative recovery was assessed by using a 9-item quality of recovery score at 24 hours after surgery. A total of 52 women randomly allocated to the VCV (n = 27) or PCV (n = 25) group completed the study. We found that after 1 hour of insufflation the PCV group had lower peak airway pressure (22.0 ± 3.4 vs 26.6 ± 4.1 cm H2O, p < .0001) and higher compliance (28.4 ± 3.7 vs 24.1 ± 3.3 mL/cm H2O, p < .0001) than the VCV group. In plasma levels of malondialdehyde, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups at 7 time points. The levels significantly increased in both groups after 1 hour of pneumoperitoneum and peaked at 2 hours after deflation. During postoperative recovery, lower scores were obtained at 24 hours after surgery compared with preoperative scores, but there were no significant differences between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

PCV is an alternative ventilation mode in gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. However, PCV offered lower peak airway pressure and higher compliance than VCV but no advantages over VCV in oxidative stress or quality of recovery.

A dynamic perfusion bioreactor approach for engineering respiratory tissues in-vitro

In vitro culture of respiratory tissues poses many challenges due to the intrinsic complexity of the respiratory system. Multiple cellular phenotypes comprise the respiratory epithelium and operate under dynamic, gas-interchanging conditions that should be replicated for near-physiologic cultivation of functional tissues in vitro. A novel biomimetic perfusion bioreactor system has been proposed to reconstitute key functional conditions of the human lung. This portable system consists of several biologically-inspired components: (i) a 3-dimensional (3-D) elastomeric soft tissue scaffold construct, (ii) a mechanical actuator, (iii) a perfusion system and (iv) gaseous exchange capabilities. These integrated components operate synergistically to create a unique, dynamic air-liquid interface (ALI) environment that allows controlled application of physiological and pathological strain while complementing standard cell culture techniques. This system holds potential for engineering 3-D tissues to meet growing demand for a range of applications, from more ethical and efficient pharmaceutical screening to clinical graft transplants.

Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation for acute respiratory failure due to acute lung injury (ALI) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)

BACKGROUND

Acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) account for one-quarter of cases of acute respiratory failure in intensive care units (ICUs). A third to half of patients will die in the ICU, in hospital or during follow-up. Mechanical ventilation of people with ALI/ARDS allows time for the lungs to heal, but ventilation is invasive and can result in lung injury. It is uncertain whether ventilator-related injury would be reduced if pressure delivered by the ventilator with each breath is controlled, or whether the volume of air delivered by each breath is limited.

OBJECTIVES

To compare pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) versus volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) in adults with ALI/ARDS to determine whether PCV reduces in-hospital mortality and morbidity in intubated and ventilated adults.

SEARCH METHODS

In October 2014, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2014, Isssue 9), MEDLINE (1950 to 1 October 2014), EMBASE (1980 to 1 October 2014), the Latin American Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) (1994 to 1 October 2014) and Science Citation Index-Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) at the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) Web of Science (1990 to 1 October 2014), as well as regional databases, clinical trials registries, conference proceedings and reference lists.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs (irrespective of language or publication status) of adults with a diagnosis of acute respiratory failure or acute on chronic respiratory failure and fulfilling the criteria for ALI/ARDS as defined by the American-European Consensus Conference who were admitted to an ICU for invasive mechanical ventilation, comparing pressure-controlled or pressure-controlled inverse-ratio ventilation, or an equivalent pressure-controlled mode (PCV), versus volume-controlled ventilation, or an equivalent volume-controlled mode (VCV).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened and selected trials, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. We sought clarification from trial authors when needed. We pooled risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous data and mean differences (MDs) for continuous data with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model. We assessed overall evidence quality using the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included three RCTs that randomly assigned a total of 1089 participants recruited from 43 ICUs in Australia, Canada, Saudi Arabia, Spain and the USA. Risk of bias of the included studies was low. Only data for mortality and barotrauma could be combined in the meta-analysis. We downgraded the quality of evidence for the three mortality outcomes on the basis of serious imprecision around the effect estimates. For mortality in hospital, the RR with PCV compared with VCV was 0.83 (95% CI 0.67 to 1.02; three trials, 1089 participants; moderate-quality evidence), and for mortality in the ICU, the RR with PCV compared with VCV was 0.84 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.99; two trials, 1062 participants; moderate-quality evidence). One study provided no evidence of clear benefit with the ventilatory mode for mortality at 28 days (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.06; 983 participants; moderate-quality evidence). The difference in effect on barotrauma between PCV and VCV was uncertain as the result of imprecision and different co-interventions used in the studies (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.77; two trials, 1062 participants; low-quality evidence). Data from one trial with 983 participants for the mean duration of ventilation, and from another trial with 78 participants for the mean number of extrapulmonary organ failures that developed with PCV or VCV, were skewed. None of the trials reported on infection during ventilation or quality of life after discharge.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Currently available data from RCTs are insufficient to confirm or refute whether pressure-controlled or volume-controlled ventilation offers any advantage for people with acute respiratory failure due to acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome. More studies including a larger number of people given PCV and VCV may provide reliable evidence on which more firm conclusions can be based.

Effects of different flow patterns and end-inspiratory pause on oxygenation and ventilation in newborn piglets: an experimental study

BACKGROUND

Historically, the elective ventilatory flow pattern for neonates has been decelerating flow (DF). Decelerating flow waveform has been suggested to improve gas exchange in the neonate when compared with square flow (SF) waveform by improving the ventilation perfusion. However, the superiority of DF compared with SF has not yet been demonstrated during ventilation in small infants. The aim of this study was to compare SF vs. DF, with or without end-inspiratory pause (EIP), in terms of oxygenation and ventilation in an experimental model of newborn piglets.

METHODS

The lungs of 12 newborn Landrace/LargeWhite crossbred piglets were ventilated with SF, DF, SF-EIP and DF-EIP. Tidal volume (VT), inspiratory to expiratory ratio (I/E), respiratory rate (RR), and FiO2 were keep constant during the study. In order to assure an open lung during the study while preventing alveolar collapse, a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 6 cmH2O was applied after a single recruitment maneuver. Gas exchange, lung mechanics and hemodynamics were measured.

RESULTS

The inspiratory flow waveform had no effect on arterial oxygenation pressure (PaO2) (276 vs. 278 mmHg, p = 0.77), alveolar dead space to alveolar tidal volume (VDalv/VTalv) (0.21 vs. 0.19 ml, p = 0.33), mean airway pressure (Pawm) (13.1 vs. 14.0 cmH2O, p = 0.69) and compliance (Crs) (3.5 vs. 3.5 ml cmH2O(-1), p = 0.73) when comparing SF and DF. A short EIP (10%) did not produce changes in the results.

CONCLUSION

The present study showed that there are no differences between SF, DF, SF-EIP and DF-EIP in oxygenation, ventilation, lung mechanics, or hemodynamics in this experimental model of newborn piglets with healthy lungs.

Detection of tidal recruitment/overdistension in lung-healthy mechanically ventilated patients under general anesthesia

BACKGROUND

The volume-dependent single compartment model (VDSCM) has been applied for identification of overdistension in mechanically ventilated patients with acute lung injury. In this observational study we evaluated the use of the VDSCM to identify tidal recruitment/overdistension induced by tidal volume (Vt) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in lung-healthy anesthetized subjects.

METHODS

Fifteen patients (ASA physical status I-II) undergoing general anesthesia for elective plastic breast reconstruction surgery were mechanically ventilated in volume-controlled ventilation (VCV), with Vt of 8 mL•kg(-1) and PEEP of 0 cm H(2)O. With these settings, ventilatory mode was randomly adjusted in VCV or pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) and PEEP was sequentially increased from 0 to 5 and 10 cm H(2)O, 5 min per step. Thereafter, PEEP was decreased to 0 cm H(2)O, Vt increased to 10 mL•kg(-1) and, keeping minute ventilation constant, PEEP was similarly increased to 5 and 10 cm H(2)O. Airway pressure and flow were continuously recorded and fitted to the VDSCM with or without considering flow-dependencies. A "distension index" (%E(2)) derived from the VDSCM was used to assess Vt and PEEP-induced recruitment/overdistension. Positive and negative values of %E(2) suggest tidal overdistension or tidal recruitment, respectively. In addition, the linear respiratory system elastance was calculated. Comparisons among variables at each PEEP value, Vt setting, ventilatory mode, and regression model considering or not considering flow-dependencies were performed with the Wilcoxon-sign rank test for paired samples (P < 0.05). Multiple comparisons were corrected with the Bonferroni method. The relative change in the estimated noisy variance was used as an index of the goodness of fit of the models.

RESULTS

VDSCM including the flow-dependent parameter significantly improved estimated noisy variance in almost all experimental conditions (11.2 to 71.4, smallest of the lower and highest of the upper 95% confidence intervals). No differences in %E(2) were observed between VCV and PCV, at comparable Vt and PEEP levels, when flow-dependencies were included in the regression model. The negligence of the flow-dependent parameter systematically led to an underestimation of %E(2) in PCV compared to VCV mode (all P < 0.02). At a given Vt, %E(2) was negative at a PEEP of 0 cm H(2)O and significantly increased with PEEP, being almost 0 at a PEEP of 5 cm H(2)O. At a given level of PEEP, %E(2) significantly increased with Vt.

CONCLUSIONS

The distension index %E(2), derived from the VDSCM considering flow-dependencies, seems able to identify tidal recruitment/overdistension induced by Vt and PEEP independent of flow waveform in healthy lung-anesthetized patients.

Lung regional stress and strain as a function of posture and ventilatory mode

During positive-pressure ventilation parenchymal deformation can be assessed as strain (volume increase above functional residual capacity) in response to stress (transpulmonary pressure). The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between stress and strain on the regional level using computed tomography in anesthetized healthy pigs in two postures and two patterns of breathing. Airway opening and esophageal pressures were used to calculate stress; change of gas content as assessed from computed tomography was used to calculate strain. Static stress-strain curves and dynamic strain-time curves were constructed, the latter during the inspiratory phase of volume and pressure-controlled ventilation, both in supine and prone position. The lung was divided into nondependent, intermediate, dependent, and central regions: their curves were modeled by exponential regression and examined for statistically significant differences. In all the examined regions, there were strong but different exponential relations between stress and strain. During mechanical ventilation, the end-inspiratory strain was higher in the dependent than in the nondependent regions. No differences between volume- and pressure-controlled ventilation were found. However, during volume control ventilation, prone positioning decreased the end-inspiratory strain of dependent regions and increased it in nondependent regions, resulting in reduced strain gradient. Strain is inhomogeneously distributed within the healthy lung. Prone positioning attenuates differences between dependent and nondependent regions. The regional effects of ventilatory mode and body positioning should be further explored in patients with acute lung injury.

A comparison of pressure-controlled and volume-controlled ventilation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

The potential advantages of pressure-controlled over volume-controlled ventilation during laparoscopic surgery have yet to be proven. We randomly assigned 42 patients with BMI <30 kg.m(-2) scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy to receive either pressure- or volume-controlled ventilation. Compared with volume-controlled ventilation, pressure-controlled ventilation resulted in a significant decrease in mean (SD) peak airway pressure at 10 min (20.4 (2.7) vs 24.0 (4.7)cmH₂O, p=0.004) and 30 min (20.7 (3.0) vs 23.9 (4.9)cmH₂O, p=0.015) and an increase in mean airway pressure at 10 min (10.5 (0.9) vs 9.6 (1.1)cmH₂O, p=0.007) and 30 min (10.5 (1.1) vs 9.6 (1.2)cmH₂O, p=0.016) after the start of surgery. Gas exchange and haemodynamic stability were similar. We conclude that pressure-controlled ventilation is a safe alternative and offers some advantages to volume-controlled ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in non-obese patients.

A long-term clinical evaluation of autoflow during assist-controlled ventilation: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Many new mechanical ventilation modes are proposed without any clinical evaluation. "Dual-controlled" modes, such as AutoFlow™, are supposed to improve patient- ventilator interfacing and could lead to fewer alarms. We performed a long-term clinical evaluation of the efficacy and safety of AutoFlow during assist-controlled ventilation, focusing on ventilator alarms.

METHODS

Forty-two adult patients, receiving mechanical ventilation for more than 2 days with a Dräger Evita 4 ventilator were randomized to conventional (n = 21) or AutoFlow (n = 21) assist-controlled ventilation. Sedation was given using a nurse-driven protocol. Ventilator-generated alarms were exhaustively recorded from the ventilator logbook with a computer. Daily blood gases and ventilation outcome were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 403 days of mechanical ventilation were studied and 45,022 alarms were recorded over a period of 8074 hours. The course of respiratory rate, minute ventilation, Fio(2), positive end-expiratory pressure, Pao(2)/Fio(2), Paco(2), and pH and doses and duration of sedation did not differ between the 2 groups. Outcome (duration of mechanical ventilation, ventilator-associated pneumonia, course of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, or death) was not different between the 2 groups. The number of alarms per hour was lower with AutoFlow assist-controlled ventilation: 3.3 [1.5 to 17] versus 9.1 [5 to 19], P < 0.0001 (median [quartile range]). In multivariate analysis, a low alarm rate was associated with activation of AutoFlow and a higher midazolam dose.

CONCLUSIONS

This first long-term clinical evaluation of the AutoFlow mode demonstrated its safety with regard to gas exchange and patient outcome. AutoFlow also allowed a very marked reduction in the number of ventilator alarms.

Pressure-dependent stress relaxation in acute respiratory distress syndrome and healthy lungs: an investigation based on a viscoelastic model

Introduction

Limiting the energy transfer between ventilator and lung is crucial for ventilatory strategy in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Part of the energy is transmitted to the viscoelastic tissue components where it is stored or dissipates. In mechanically ventilated patients, viscoelasticity can be investigated by analyzing pulmonary stress relaxation. While stress relaxation processes of the lung have been intensively investigated, non-linear interrelations have not been systematically analyzed, and such analyses have been limited to small volume or pressure ranges. In this study, stress relaxation of mechanically ventilated lungs was investigated, focusing on non-linear dependence on pressure. The range of inspiratory capacity was analyzed up to a plateau pressure of 45 cmH₂O.

Methods

Twenty ARDS patients and eleven patients with normal lungs under mechanical ventilation were included. Rapid flow interruptions were repetitively applied using an automated super-syringe maneuver. Viscoelastic resistance, compliance and time constant were determined by multiple regression analysis using a lumped parameter model. This same viscoelastic model was used to investigate the frequency dependence of the respiratory system's impedance.

Results

The viscoelastic time constant was independent of pressure, and it did not differ between normal and ARDS lungs. In contrast, viscoelastic resistance increased non-linearly with pressure (normal: 8.4 (7.4-11.9) [median (lower - upper quartile)] to 35.2 (25.6-39.5) cmH₂O·sec/L; ARDS: 11.9 (9.2-22.1) to 73.5 (56.8-98.7)cmH₂O·sec/L), and viscoelastic compliance decreased non-linearly with pressure (normal: 130.1(116.9-151.3) to 37.4(34.7-46.3) mL/cmH₂O; ARDS: 125.8(80.0-211.0) to 17.1(13.8-24.7)mL/cmH₂O). The pulmonary impedance increased with pressure and decreased with respiratory frequency.

Conclusions

Viscoelastic compliance and resistance are highly non-linear with respect to pressure and differ considerably between ARDS and normal lungs. None of these characteristics can be observed for the viscoelastic time constant. From our analysis of viscoelastic properties we cautiously conclude that the energy transfer from the respirator to the lung can be reduced by application of low inspiratory plateau pressures and high respiratory frequencies. This we consider to be potentially lung protective.

Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation during one-lung ventilation in the prone position for robot-assisted esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

The prone position during robotic esophageal mobilization for minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) provides several advantages with regards to operative times, surgeon ergonomics, and surgical view; however, this technique requires one-lung ventilation (OLV). There are no guidelines about ventilatory modes during OLV in the prone position. We investigated the effects of volume-controlled (VCV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) on oxygenation and intrapulmonary shunt during OLV in the prone position in patients who underwent robot-assisted esophagectomy.

METHODS

Eighteen patients, no major obstructive or restrictive pulmonary disease, were allocated randomly to one of two groups. In the first group (n = 9), OLV was started by VCV and the ventilator was switched to PCV after 30 minutes. In the second group (n = 9), the modes of ventilation were performed in the opposite order in the prone position. Hemodynamic and respiratory variables were obtained during OLV at the end of each ventilatory mode.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in arterial oxygen tension (PaO(2)), airway pressures, dynamic lung compliance, or physiologic dead space (Vd/Vt) during OLV between PCV and VCV in the prone position. Intrapulmonary shunt (Qs/Qt) was significantly lower with VCV than with PCV during OLV in the prone position (p = 0.044).

CONCLUSION

PCV provides no advantages compared with VCV with regard to respiratory and hemodynamic variables during OLV in the prone position. Either ventilatory mode can be safely used for patients who undergo robot-assisted esophagectomy and who have normal body mass index and preserved pulmonary function.

Ability of dynamic airway pressure curve profile and elastance for positive end-expiratory pressure titration

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the ability of three indices derived from the airway pressure curve for titrating positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to minimize mechanical stress while improving lung aeration assessed by computed tomography (CT).

DESIGN

Prospective, experimental study.

SETTING

University research facilities.

SUBJECTS

Twelve pigs.

INTERVENTIONS

Animals were anesthetized and mechanically ventilated with tidal volume of 7 ml kg(-1). In non-injured lungs (n = 6), PEEP was set at 16 cmH(2)O and stepwise decreased until zero. Acute lung injury was then induced either with oleic acid (n = 6) or surfactant depletion (n = 6). A recruitment maneuver was performed, the PEEP set at 26 cmH(2)O and decreased stepwise until zero. CT scans were obtained at end-expiratory and end-inspiratory pauses. The elastance of the respiratory system (Ers), the stress index and the percentage of volume-dependent elastance (%E (2)) were estimated.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

In non-injured and injured lungs, the PEEP at which Ers was lowest (8-4 and 16-12 cmH(2)O, respectively) corresponded to the best compromise between recruitment/hyperinflation. In non-injured lungs, stress index and %E (2) correlated with tidal recruitment and hyperinflation. In injured lungs, stress index and %E (2) suggested overdistension at all PEEP levels, whereas the CT scans evidenced tidal recruitment and hyperinflation simultaneously.

CONCLUSION

During ventilation with low tidal volumes, Ers seems to be useful for guiding PEEP titration in non-injured and injured lungs, while stress index and %E (2) are useful in non-injured lungs only. Our results suggest that Ers can be superior to the stress index and %E (2) to guide PEEP titration in focal loss of lung aeration.

Respiratory and haemodynamic effects of volume-controlled vs pressure-controlled ventilation during laparoscopy: a cross-over study with echocardiographic assessment

BACKGROUND

The effects of pressure-controlled (PC) ventilation on the ventilatory and haemodynamic parameters during laparoscopy procedures had not been carefully assessed. This prospective cross-over study was undertaken to compare how volume-controlled (VC) and PC modes could affect pulmonary mechanics, gas exchange, and cardiac function in patients undergoing laparoscopy.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients undergoing laparoscopic urological procedures had their lungs ventilated at the beginning with VC ventilation. PC ventilation was instituted at the end of the VC sequence. Ventilator settings were adjusted to keep tidal volume, respiratory rate, and Fi(o(2)) constant in every mode. A complete set of ventilatory, haemodynamic, and gas exchange parameters was obtained under VC after 40 min of pneumoperitoneum and 20 min after switching for PC. Transoesophageal echocardiography was performed in order to evaluate systolic and diastolic function of the heart.

RESULTS

When VC was switched to PC, peak airway pressure decreased [mean (sd) 32 (6) vs 27 (6) cm H(2)O; P < 0.0001], peak inspiratory flow increased [17 (3) vs 48 (8) litre min(-1); P < 0.0001), and dynamic compliance improved [+15 (8)%]. No difference was noted for static airway pressure, static compliance, and arterial oxygenation. No significant change could be demonstrated in the systolic [left ventricular end-systolic wall stress 66 (16) vs 63 (14) x 10(3) dyn cm(-2) m(-2)] or diastolic function [early diastolic velocity 10.3 (2.5) vs 10.5 (2.7) cm s(-1)].

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, no short-term beneficial effect of PC ventilation could be demonstrated over conventional VC ventilation in patients with pneumoperitoneum.

Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation during one-lung ventilation for thoracic surgery

BACKGROUND

Pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) has been suggested as a tool to improve oxygenation during one-lung ventilation (OLV) for patients undergoing thoracic surgery. In this study we investigated whether PCV results in improved arterial oxygenation compared with volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) during OLV.

METHODS

Fifty-eight patients with good preoperative pulmonary function scheduled for thoracic surgery were prospectively randomized into two groups. Those in group A underwent OLV initially with VCV for 30 min followed by PCV for a similar period of time. Those in group B underwent OLV initially with PCV for 30 min followed by VCV for a similar duration. Airway pressures and arterial blood gases were obtained during OLV at the end of each ventilatory mode.

RESULTS

There were no differences during OLV in arterial oxygenation between VCV (Pao2, 206.1 +/- 62.4 mm Hg) and PCV (Pao2, 202.1 +/- 56.4 mm Hg; P = 0.534). Peak airway pressure was lower with PCV than with VCV (24.43 +/- 3.42 cm H2O vs. 34.16 +/- 5.21 cm H2O; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of PCV during OLV does not lead to improved oxygenation during OLV compared with VCV for patients with good preoperative pulmonary function, but PCV did lead to lower peak airway pressures. Further study is needed for patients with severe obstructive or restrictive pulmonary disease.

Pressure control ventilation

As mechanical ventilators become increasingly sophisticated, clinicians are faced with a variety of ventilatory modes that use volume, pressure, and time in combination to achieve the overall goal of assisted ventilation. Although much has been written about the advantages and disadvantages of these increasingly complex modalities, currently there is no convincing evidence of the superiority of one mode of ventilation over another. Pressure control ventilation may offer particular advantages in certain circumstances in which variable flow rates are preferred or when pressure and volume limitation is required. The goal of this article is to provide clinicians with a fundamental understanding of the dependent and independent variables active in pressure control ventilation and describe features of the mode that may contribute to improved gas exchange and patient-ventilator synchronization.

Mode of Mechanical Ventilation: Volume Controlled Mode

The primary goal of ventilator support is the maintenance of adequate, but not necessarily normal, gas exchange, which must be achieved with minimal lung injury and the lowest possible degree of hemodynamic impairment, while avoiding injury to distant organs such as the brain. Modes of MV are described by the relationships between the various types of breaths and by the variables that can occur during the inspiratory phase of ventilation. There are two basic modes of ventilation: ventilation limited by a pressure target and ventilation limited to the delivery of a specified volume.

Linear Model and Algorithm to Automatically Estimate the Pressure Limit of Pressure Controlled Ventilation for Delivering a Target Tidal Volume

OBJECTIVE

To theoretically assess the viability of an automatic procedure to support the anesthesiologist in properly setting mechanical ventilators when the operating conditions are switched from volume controlled to pressure controlled ventilation whilst maintaining the preset tidal volume. The procedure is based on a simple linear model of the ventilator breathing system with constant parameters and utilizes the signals gathered by the ventilator without the need to add further equipment. After a short period of stable volume controlled ventilation with the desired tidal volume, the herewith described algorithm allows the calculation of the value of pressure limit to set in pressure controlled mode which assures the previously settled tidal volume with the same breathing frequency and inspiratory-expiratory time ratio.

METHODS

The algorithm allows the online identification of the four parameters necessary for the mathematical model that are obtained by means of a direct comparison between the pressure, flow and volume waveforms generated by the model and the analog signals provided by the ventilator. The theoretical approach was validated by two different ventilators, various settings, two breathing circuits, endotracheal tubes of various sizes and two mechanical simulators of the respiratory system operating in various conditions.

RESULTS

Errors usually less than 5% (p < 0.05) on the target tidal volume were obtained for various settings typically used for adult ventilation in less than 10 s. The theoretical approach shows its limitations (errors of 10+/- 5%, p < 0.05) at high breathing frequencies (30-40 bpm) and low tidal volumes (200-300 ml).

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed theoretical approach shows the viability, for adult settings, of one of the simplest mathematical model for mechanical ventilation in order to quickly and safely switch from volume controlled to pressure controlled ventilation. The algorithm could easily be in perspective implemented in the software of the ventilator providing the anesthesiologist with an indication on the value of pressure limit to set in order to safely switch ventilation mode.

Effects of filtering and delays on the estimates of a nonlinear respiratory mechanics model

Estimation of mechanical properties of the respiratory system may be disturbed by instrumentation and physical set-up. The effects of lowpass filtering, filter mismatch and inter-channel delay in the digital converter are assessed on numerically simulated signals from a nonlinear model of the respiratory system. Large biases in model parameter estimates (up to about -300% for some parameters) were caused by these instrumental interferences and were reduced by including an inertance in the retrieved model. The results reinforce the importance of a careful evaluation of the instrumental set-up used in physiological measurements.

Pulmonary gas distribution during ventilation with different inspiratory flow patterns in experimental lung injury -- a computed tomography study

BACKGROUND

There is still controversy about the optimal inspiratory flow pattern for ventilation of patients with acute lung injury. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) with a decelerating inspiratory flow with volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) with constant inspiratory flow on pulmonary gas distribution (PGD) in experimentally induced ARDS.

METHODS

Sixteen adult sheep were randomized to be ventilated with PCV or VCV after surfactant depletion by repeated bronchoalveolar lavage. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) was increased in a stepwise manner from zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) to 7, 14 and 21 cm H(2)O in hourly intervals. Respiratory rate, inspiration-to-expiration ratio and tidal volume were kept constant. Central hemodynamics, gas exchange and airway pressures were measured. Electron beam computed tomographic (EBCT) scans of the entire lungs were performed at baseline (preinjury) and each level of end-expiratory pressure during an inspiratory and expiratory hold maneuver. The lungs were three-dimensionally reconstructed and volumetric assessments were made separating the lungs into four subvolumes classified as overinflated, normally aerated, poorly aerated and nonaerated.

RESULTS

Pressure-controlled ventilation led to a decrease in peak airway pressure and an increase in mean airway pressure. No differences between groups were found regarding plateau pressures, hemodynamics and gas exchange. Recruitment, defined as a decrease in expiratory lung volume classified as nonaerated, was similar in both groups and predominantly associated with PEEP. Overinflated lung volumes were increased with PCV.

CONCLUSIONS

In this model of acute lung injury, ventilation with decelerating inspiratory flow had no beneficial effects on PGD when compared with ventilation with constant inspiratory flow, while the increase in overinflated lung volumes may raise concerns regarding potential ventilator-associated lung injury.

Alveolar recruitment in combination with sufficient positive end-expiratory pressure increases oxygenation and lung aeration in patients with severe chest trauma

OBJECTIVE

Investigation of oxygenation and lung aeration during mechanical ventilation according to the open lung concept in patients with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

SETTING

Surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital.

PATIENTS

We retrospectively identified 17 patients with acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome due to pulmonary contusion who had thoracic helical computed tomography scans before and after ventilation with the open lung concept.

INTERVENTIONS

Baseline ventilation consisted of low tidal volumes (< or =6 mL/kg) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP; 5-17 cm H2O). We briefly applied high inspiratory pressures for opening up collapsed alveoli. External PEEP and intrinsic PEEP were combined to keep recruited lung units open. We generated intrinsic PEEP by pressure-cycled high-frequency inverse ratio ventilation (80 min, inspiratory/expiratory ratio 2:1) and maintained our ventilatory strategy for 24 hrs. Then, after reducing total PEEP by decreasing respiratory rate, Pao2/Fio2 ratio was reevaluated. If it remained >300 mm Hg, weaning was started. If not, previous ventilator settings were resumed for another 24 hrs after recruiting the lungs once again.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Physiologic variables and ventilator settings were obtained from routine charts. Data from computed tomography before and after the open lung concept were analyzed for volumetric quantification of lung aeration and collapse. All results are presented as median and range. During baseline ventilation, PEEP was 10 (range, 5-17) cm H2O and after recruitment 21 (range, 18-26) cm H2O. Opening pressures were 65 (range, 50-80) cm H2O. After recruitment, Pao2/Fio2 ratio was higher in all patients. Total lung volume increased from 2915 (range, 1952-4941) to 4247 (range, 2285-6355) mL and normally aerated volume from 1742 (range, 774-2941) to 2971 (range, 1270-5232) mL. Atelectasis decreased significantly from 604 (range, 147-1538) to 106 (range, 0-736) mL. Hyperinflation increased significantly from 5 (range, 0-188) to 62 (range, 1-424) mL, whereas poor aeration did not change substantially from 649 (range, 302-1292) to 757 (range, 350-1613) mL. No hemodynamic problems occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung recruitment increased arterial oxygenation, normally aerated lung volume, and total lung volume while decreasing the amount of collapsed tissue. These results indicate that the open lung concept is a reasonable mode of ventilation for patients with severe chest trauma.

Airway pressure-time curve profile (stress index) detects tidal recruitment/hyperinflation in experimental acute lung injury

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the shape of the airway pressure-time (Paw-t) curve during constant flow inflation corresponds to radiologic evidence of tidal recruitment or tidal hyperinflation in an experimental model of acute lung injury.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized laboratory animal investigation.

SETTING

Department of Clinical Physiology, University of Uppsala, Sweden.

SUBJECTS

Anesthetized, paralyzed, and mechanically ventilated pigs.

INTERVENTIONS

Acute lung injury was induced by lung lavage. During constant inspiratory flow, the Paw-t curve was fitted to a power equation: airway pressure =a x time + c, where coefficient b (stress index) describes the shape of the curve:b = 1, straight curve; b < 1, progressive increase in slope; and b > 1, progressive decrease in slope. Tidal volume (Vt) was 6 mL/kg, and positive end-expiratory pressure was set to obtain a b value between 0.9 and 1.1 before (b = 1) and after (b = 1 after recruiting maneuver) application of a recruiting maneuver. Positive end-expiratory pressure was decreased and Vt increased to obtain 0.9 >b > 0.8 and 0.8 >b > 0.6, whereas positive end-expiratory pressure and Vt were both increased to obtain 1.3 >b > 1.1 and 1.5 >b > 1.3. Experimental conditions sequence was random.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Pulmonary computed tomography was obtained during end-expiratory and end-inspiratory occlusions. Tidal recruitment was quantified as nonaerated (between -100 and +100 Hounsfield units) lung area at end-expiration minus end-inspiration. Tidal hyperinflation was quantified as hyperinflated (between -900 and -1000 Hounsfield units) lung area at end-inspiration minus end-expiration. Computed tomography images showed that tidal recruitment and tidal hyperinflation corresponded to b < 1 and b > 1, respectively. Stress index values and tidal recruitment and tidal hyperinflation values were significantly correlated (R =.917 and R =.911, p <.0001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Shape of the Paw-t curve detects tidal recruitment and tidal hyperinflation.

Ventilation-Perfusion Distribution Related to Different Inspiratory Flow Patterns in Experimental Lung Injury

In acute lung injury (ALI), controlled mechanical ventilation with decelerating inspiratory flow (.V(dec)) has been suggested to improve oxygenation when compared with constant flow (.V(con)) by improving the distribution of ventilation and perfusion (.V(A)/.Q). We performed the present study to test this hypothesis in an animal model of ALI. Furthermore, the effects of combined decelerating and constant flow (Vdot;(deco)) were evaluated. Thus, 18 pigs with experimental ALI were randomized to receive mechanical ventilation with either .V(con), .V(dec) or a fixed combination of both flow wave forms (.V(deco)) at the same tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure level for 6 h. Hemodynamics, gas exchange, and .V(A)/.Q distribution were determined. The results revealed an improvement of oxygenation resulting from a decrease of pulmonary shunt within each group (P < 0.05). However, blood flow to lung areas with a normal .V(A)/.Q distribution increased only during ventilation with .V(con) (P < 0.05). Accordingly, PaO(2) was higher with .V(con) than with .V(dec) and .V(deco) (P < 0.05). We conclude that contrary to the hypothesis, .V(con)provides a more favorable .V(A)/.Q distribution, and hence better oxygenation, when compared with .V(dec) and .V(deco) in this model of ALI.

IMPLICATIONS

In acute lung injury, mechanical ventilation with decelerating flow has been suggested to improve ventilation-perfusion distribution when compared with constant flow. We tested this hypothesis in an animal model. Contrary to the hypothesis, we found a more favorable ventilation-perfusion distribution during constant flow when compared with decelerating flow.